Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

Home , Christine Mitchell

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180117000032 . .

https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms The International Journal for Healthcare and Ethics Committees

Volume 26, 2017 Volume Contents

, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at at available use, of terms Core Cambridge the to subject ,

02 Oct 2021 at 22:45:58 at 2021 Oct 02

, on on ,

170.106.35.93 . IP address: address: IP .

Cambridge University Press

https://www.cambridge.org/core Downloaded from from Downloaded CLINICAL NEUROETHICS ADVISORY BOARD

EDITOR Thomasine Kushner, University of California, Berkeley [email protected]

ASSOCIATE EDITOR James Giordano, Georgetown University Medical Center

EDITORIAL BOARD Yves Agid, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, France

Jennifer Chandler, University of Ottawa, Canada https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180117000032

. . Markus Christen, University of Zurich, Switzerland Joseph J. Fins, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York Paul J. Ford, Department of Bioethics, Cleveland Clinic Grant Gillett, University of Otago Medical School, New Zealand John Harris, University of Manchester, England Stephen Hauser, University of California, San Francisco Judy Illes, The University of British Columbia, Canada Philipp Kellmeyer, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Germany Catherine Madison, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco Christine Mitchell, Harvard Medical School Erik Parens, The Hastings Center, Garrison, New York John R. Shook, University at Buffalo

Alan Yee, California Pacific Medical Center https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms

The Cambridge Bioethics Education Working Groups: Connecting Bioethics Educators Around the World The purpose of the Cambridge Bioethics Education Working Groups is to encourage people and institutions to work together on developing bioethics education in their countries. These focus groups invite others to share their information and develop mutual projects to further how bioethics is taught in universities, hospitals, and for the general public. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/cambridge-bioethics-education-working-groups

EDITORS Thomasine Kushner, PhD, University of California, Berkeley Steve Heilig, MPH, San Francisco Medical Society

ASSOCIATE EDITORS Matti Häyry, Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland Tuija Takala, University of Helsinki, Finland David C. Thomasma, PhD, Co-Editor, 1992–2002

EDITORIAL BOARD , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at at available use, of terms Core Cambridge the to subject , Akira Akabayashi, Kyoto University, Japan William Andereck, Medicine and Human Values, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco Daniel Callahan, The Hastings Center, Garrison, New York Arthur Caplan, Division of Medical Ethics, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York Andrew Dobson, Keele University, England Denise Dudzinki, Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine Joseph J. Fins, Division of Medical Ethics, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York 02 Oct 2021 at 22:45:58 at 2021 Oct 02 Leonard M. Fleck, Center for Ethics and Humanities, Michigan State University

, on on , Paul J. Ford, Department of Bioethics, Cleveland Clinic James Giordano, Georgetown University Medical Center Amnon Goldworth, Stanford University School of Medicine John Harris, University of Manchester, England

170.106.35.93 Gerrit K. Kimsma, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Eric M. Meslin, Indiana University Center for Bioethics, Indianapolis Christine Mitchell, Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School Jonathan D. Moreno, Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia

. IP address: address: IP . Rosamond Rhodes, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York Pablo Rodriguez del Pozo, Weill Medical College of Cornell University in Qatar Doris Schroeder, Centre for Professional Ethics, University of Central Lancashire, England Robyn Shapiro, Center for the Study of Bioethics, Medical College of Wisconsin Pavel Tichtchenko, Institute of Philosophy, Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia Griffin Trotter, Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University Mark R. Wicclair, University of Pittsburgh & West Virginia University

Neuroethics Network/Cambridge Consortium for Bioethics Education/International Bioethics Retreat

http://www.icmbioethics.com/cambridge-home.html

https://www.cambridge.org/core Downloaded from from Downloaded

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180117000032

. . Volume 26, Number 1, January 2017 CONTENTS

Contributors 1

Special Section: Conscientious Objection in Healthcare: Problems and Perspectives

Guest Editorial: Conscientious Objection in Healthcare: Problems and Perspectives

Alberto Giubilini and Julian Savulescu 3 https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Conscientious Objection in Healthcare and Moral Integrity Mark Wicclair 7 Tolerance, Professional Judgment, and the Discretionary Space of the Physician Daniel P. Sulmasy 18 Conscientious Objection and “Effective Referral” Roger Trigg 32 My Conscience May Be My Guide, but You May Not Need to Honor It Hugh LaFollette 44 The Legal Ethical Backbone of Conscientious Refusal

Christian Munthe and Morten Ebbe Juul Nielsen 59 , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at at available use, of terms Core Cambridge the to subject , The Cost of Conscience: Kant on Conscience and Conscientious Objection Jeanette Kennett 69 The Inevitability of Assessing Reasons in Debates about

Conscientious Objection in Medicine 02 Oct 2021 at 22:45:58 at 2021 Oct 02

Robert F. Card 82 , on on , Two Concepts of Conscience and their Implications for Conscience-Based Refusal in Healthcare

Steve Clarke 97 170.106.35.93 Conscientious Objection, Complicity in Wrongdoing, and a Not-So-Moderate Approach

. IP address: address: IP . Francesca Minerva 109 How to Allow Conscientious Objection in Medicine While Protecting Patient Rights Aaron Ancell and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong 120 Conscientious Non-objection in Intensive Care Dominic Wilkinson 132 Refusing to Treat Sexual Dysfunction in Sex Offenders https://www.cambridge.org/core Thomas Douglas 143

III Downloaded from from Downloaded Departments and Columns Responses and Dialogue When the Milk of Human Kindness Becomes a Luxury

(and Untested) Good: A Reply to Harris’s Unconditional https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180117000032

. . Embrace of Mitochondrial Replacement Techniques Inmaculada de Melo-Martin 159 A Response to “Germline Modification and the Burden of Human Existence,” by John Harris (CQ 25(1)) How to Welcome New Technologies: Some Comments on the Article by Inmaculada de Melo-Martin John Harris 166 Perspectives Principles of Ethical Leadership Illustrated by Institutional https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Management of Prion Contamination of Neurosurgical Instruments Tim Lahey, Joseph Pepe, and William Nelson 173 Corrigendum The Effects of Closed-Loop Medical Devices on the Autonomy and Accountability of Persons and Systems—CORRIGENDUM Philipp Kellmeyer, Thomas Cochrane, Oliver Müller, Christine Mitchell, Tonio Ball, Joseph J. Fins, and Nikola Biller-Andorno 180

Best Practices Guidelines for Publishing in the Bioethics Literature , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at at available use, of terms Core Cambridge the to subject , Volume 26, Number 2, April 2017 CONTENTS

Contributors 181

02 Oct 2021 at 22:45:58 at 2021 Oct 02 Special Section: Synthetic Biology: Ethical and Philosophical

, on on , Challenges

Guest Editorial: Yet Another Emerging Technology: Old and New Questions Posed by Synthetic Biology 170.106.35.93 Tuija Takala and Matti Häyry 183 Synthetic Biology and Ethics: Past, Present, and Future

Matti Häyry 186 . IP address: address: IP . Consequentialism and the Synthetic Biology Problem Patrick Heavey 206 The Bioethicist Who Cried “Synthetic Biology”: An Analysis of the Function of Bioterrorism Predictions in Bioethics Søren Holm 230 Finding Hope in Synthetic Biology

https://www.cambridge.org/core Tuija Takala 239

IV Downloaded from from Downloaded Synthetic Biology between Self-Regulation and Public Discourse: Ethical Issues and the Many Roles of the Ethicist Gardar Arnason 246

Synthetic Biology: The Response of the Commission of the https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180117000032

. . (Catholic) Bishops’ Conferences of the European Community Patrick Heavey 257 Sex before the State: Civic Sex, Reproductive Innovations, and Gendered Parental Identity Timothy F. Murphy 267

Departments and Columns Responses and Dialogue https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Resource Allocation, Treatment, Disclosure, and Mitochondrial Replacement Techniques: Some Comments on de Melo-Martin and Harris César Palacios-González 278 A Response to “When the Milk of Human Kindness becomes a Luxury (and untested) Good,” by Inmaculada de Melo-Martin, and “How to Welcome New Technologies: Some Comments on Inmaculada de Melo-Martin,” by John Harris (CQ 26 (1)) From What Kind of Research Can They Dissent? Distinguishing between Biomedical and Behavioral Research in Granting Dissent and Assent to Chimpanzees Used in Experimentation Maria Botero 288

, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at at available use, of terms Core Cambridge the to subject , A Response to “Can a Chimp Say ‘No’” by Andrew Fenton (CQ 23 (2)), and “Is There a Role for Assent or Dissent in Animal Research,” by Holly Kantin and David Wendler (CQ 24 (4)) Neuroethics Now Neuroscience Fiction as Eidolá: Social Reflection and 02 Oct 2021 at 22:45:58 at 2021 Oct 02 Neuroethical Obligations in Depictions of Neuroscience , on on , in Film Rachel Wurzman, David Yaden, and James Giordano 292 Beyond an Open Future: Cognitive Enhancement and the 170.106.35.93 Welfare of Children Jenny I. Krutzinna 313

. IP address: address: IP . Bioethics and Information Technology Introduction: Symposium on Ethical Issues in Data Science and Digital Medicine Kenneth W. Goodman 326 The Electronic Medical Record and the Loss of Narrative Daniel A. Moros 328 The Electronic Health Record and Patient Portals in HIV Medicine: Pushing the Boundaries of Current Ethics https://www.cambridge.org/core and Stigma Demetre C Daskalakis 332

V Downloaded from from Downloaded Safeguarding Confidentiality in Electronic Health Records Akhil Shenoy and Jacob M. Appel 337 Health Information Technology as a Universal Donor to

Bioethics Education https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180117000032

. . Kenneth W. Goodman 342 Bioethics Education Bioethicsing: Medical Students Engaged in Bioethics Thalia Arawi and Diana Mikati 348

Best Practices Guidelines for Publishing in the Bioethics Literature

https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Volume 26, Number 3, July 2017 CONTENTS

Contributors 355

Special Section: Enhancement and Goodness Enhancements: How and Why to Become Better, How and Why to Become Good Guest Editors: Vojin Rakic´ and John Harris* Enhancements: How and Why to Become Better, How and Why to Become Good Vojin Rakic´ 358

Is It Desirable to Be Able to Do the Undesirable? Moral , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at at available use, of terms Core Cambridge the to subject , Bioenhancement and the Little Alex Problem Michael Hauskeller 365 Commentary: What Price Freedom? Sarah Chan 377

02 Oct 2021 at 22:45:58 at 2021 Oct 02 Moral Bioenhancement and Free Will: Continuing the Debate

Vojin Rakic´ 384 , on on , Commentary: Freedom Means Self-Awareness and Self-Control: Bioenhancement Can Help

James Hughes 394 170.106.35.93 Would We Even Know Moral Bioenhancement If We Saw It? Harris Wiseman 398 . IP address: address: IP . Commentary: Moral Bioenhancement Worthy of the Name Robert Sparrow 411 Imagining Moral Bioenhancement Practices: Drawing Inspiration from Moral Education, Public Health Ethics, and Forensic Psychiatry

Jona Specker and Maartje H.N. Schermer 415 https://www.cambridge.org/core

VI Downloaded from from Downloaded Commentary: Reservations about the Lessons Drawn from Moral Education, Public Health Ethics, and Forensic Psychiatry

Bert Gordijn 427 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180117000032

. . Modeling the Social Dynamics of Moral Enhancement: Social Strategies Sold Over the Counter and the Stability of Society Anders Sandberg and Joao Fabiano 431 Commentary: Modeling the Social Dynamics of Moral Enhancement while Illustrating Some Basic Divergences in the Enhancement Debate Søren Holm 446 Human Enhancement and the Story of Job

https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Nicholas Agar and Johnny McDonald 449 Enhancing a Person, Enhancing a Civilization: A Research Program at the Intersection of Bioethics, Future Studies, and Astrobiology Milan M. C´irkovic´ 459

Departments and Columns The Caduceus in Court Expert Testimony by a Bioethicist: Perspectives and Practice John J. Paris 469 Neuroethics Now More Human than Human

, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at at available use, of terms Core Cambridge the to subject , David Lawrence 476 Bioethics Education When Teachable Moments Become Ethically Problematic Elizabeth Dzeng 491 Simulated Mortality—We Can Do More: An Imperative

02 Oct 2021 at 22:45:58 at 2021 Oct 02 for Educators

, on on , Andrew T. Goldberg, Benjamin J. Heller, Jesse Hochkeppel, Adam I. Levine, and Samuel DeMaria 495 Dissecting Bioethics

170.106.35.93 Profound Intellectual Disability and the Bestowment View of Moral Status Simo Vehmas and Benjamin Curtis 505

. IP address: address: IP . CQ Review Where Science and Ethics Meet: Dilemmas at the Frontiers of Medicine and Biology, by Chris Willmott and Salvador Macip Reviewed by Thomas R. Cole 517 Perspectives Medical Companionship

Howard Trachtman 518 https://www.cambridge.org/core

VII Downloaded from from Downloaded Best Practices Guidelines for Publishing in the Bioethics Literature

Volume 26, Number 4, October 2017 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180117000032 . . CONTENTS

Contributors 521

From the Editors Neuroethics: Cashing the Reality Check Thomasine Kushner and James Giordano 524

https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Two Hemispheres Subdural Hematoma: From Inside and Out Grant Gillett 527

Articles

Ethical and Legal Implications of the Methodological Crisis in Neuroimaging Philipp Kellmeyer 530 Locked Out: Ignorance and Responsibility in Brain–Computer Interface Communication in Locked-in Syndrome Veronica Johansson, Surjo R. Soekadar,

and Jens Clausen 555 , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at at available use, of terms Core Cambridge the to subject , Do Chimeras have Minds? The Ethics of Clinical Research on a Human–Animal Brain Model Benjamin Capps 577 Research Domain Criteria as Psychiatric Nosology:

Conceptual, Practical, and Neuroethical Implications 02 Oct 2021 at 22:45:58 at 2021 Oct 02

Faisal Akram and James Giordano 592 , on on , Pesticides: A Case Domain for Environmental Neuroethics Laura Y. Cabrera 602

170.106.35.93 Effaced Enigmata: When Ethics Precedes Neuroscience Grant Gillett 616 Practical Implications of the Minimally Conscious State . IP address: address: IP . Diagnosis in Adults Karola V. Kreitmair and Katherine E. Kruse 628

Continuing the Conversation Deep Brain Stimulation, Authenticity and Value Jonathan Pugh, Hannah Maslen,

and Julian Savulescu 640 https://www.cambridge.org/core

VIII Downloaded from from Downloaded Deep Brain Stimulation, Authenticity and Value: Further Reflections

Sven Nyholm and Elizabeth O’Neill 658 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180117000032 . . Departments and Columns

Pathographies: Voices of Illness Obbligato Mark Osteen 671

CN Reviews Parental Responsibility in the Context of Neuroscience https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms and Genetics, by Kristien Hens, Daniela Cutas, and Dorothee Horstkötter Reviewed by Arianna Manzini, Rose Mortimer, and Ilina Singh 681 Ethics in Child Health: Principles and Cases in Neurodisability, by Peter L. Rosenbaum, Gabriel M. Ronen, Bernard Dan, Jennifer Johannesen, and Eric Racine Reviewed by Michael Shevell 686

Responses and Dialogue Closed-Loop Medical Devices Might Reduce Iatrogenic Loss of Autonomous Action Selection

Omar F.F. Odish and Martijn Beudel 688 , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at at available use, of terms Core Cambridge the to subject , A Reply to “The Effects of Closed-Loop Medical Devices on the Autonomy and Accountability of Persons and Systems,” by Philipp Kellmeyer, Thomas Cochrane, Oliver Müller, Christine Mitchell, Tonio Ball, Joseph J. Fins, and Nikola Biller-Andorno (CQ 25(4))

02 Oct 2021 at 22:45:58 at 2021 Oct 02 A Hauntingly Familiar Scenario

, on on , Catherine Madison 691 A Reply to “Dementia, Advance Directives, and Discontinuity of Personality,” by Joseph P . DeMarco

170.106.35.93 and Samuel H. LiPuma (CQ 25(4))

. IP address: address: IP . What Do I Do Now? The Case: “I Have to Ace These Exams, or I’ll Crater Law School” 693 Commentary: Cognitive Enhancement: Are the Claims of Critics “Good Enough”? Vojin Rakic´ 693 Commentary: Care, Choice, and the Ethical Imagination

Fred B. Ketchum 698 https://www.cambridge.org/core

IX Downloaded from from Downloaded Commentary: Aiding or Abetting? Responding to a Request for Cognitive Enhancement William S. Andereck 700

Commentary: Just Say “No” https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180117000032

. . Hervé Chneiweiss 701

In Memoriam From Bench to Bedside in Neuropsychology: Professor Glyn W. Humphreys’ Legacy Nele Demeyere 705

Best Practices Guidelines for Publishing in the Bioethics Literature

https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms

, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at at available use, of terms Core Cambridge the to subject ,

02 Oct 2021 at 22:45:58 at 2021 Oct 02

, on on ,

170.106.35.93

. IP address: address: IP . https://www.cambridge.org/core

X Downloaded from from Downloaded Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

GUIDELINES FOR CONTRIBUTORS

SCOPE OF THE JOURNAL. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics is designed to serve as an international forum for addressing the increasingly complex challenges of biology, medi-

cine, and healthcare. As a journal committed to expanding the community of bioethicists https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180117000032

. . worldwide, CQ welcomes well-argued papers from a variety of methodological and nor- mative viewpoints.

PREPARATION OF MANUSCRIPTS. Papers submitted to CQ should be sent as electronic copy, preferably in MS Word, and should contain in the following order: title page, text, references. Manuscripts typically should not exceed 3,500 words, including endnotes. On a separate page, supply a brief entry listing academic degrees, institutional affiliation, and current projects for a “Contributors” section that appears in each issue of CQ. More detailed guidelines follow.

Title Page: Title of the article, name of each author with institutional affiliation and com- plete mailing address for correspondence, plus phone and fax numbers and e-mail address. https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Include a short title of 45 characters or fewer to be used as a runninghead. Acknowledgments, if any, are to be provided with the submission as an unnumbered footnote. They are not to be added later with proof corrections.

References: Responsibility for accuracy and thoroughness of citations rests with the author(s). References are to be placed as endnotes following the article (not as footnotes on each page) and are to be numbered in the order of the callouts. For multiple callouts of the same reference, each callout is to be given its own superscript arabic number; then in the Notes section a crossreference should be used, styled as in item 4 below. The names of the first six authors of each reference item should be provided, followed by “, et al.” if there are more than six authors. References should follow the format of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, with the CQ modification that titles of journals and books are to be spelled out in full (except JAMA) and italicized. Sample references in the style of the ICMJE Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals can be obtained at http:// www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/uniform_requirements.html. Lawyers may use their own standard style (“The Bluebook”) but avoid abbreviations.

, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at at available use, of terms Core Cambridge the to subject , Examples of the correct CQ format follow. 1. Parker SG, Kassirer JP. Decision analysis. New England Journal of Medicine 1987;316:250–8. or: . . . 1987;316(2):250–8. 2. Beauchamp TL, Walters L, eds. Contemporary Issues in Bioethics, 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; 1994. 3. Weinstein L, Swartz MN. Pathogenic properties of invading microorganisms. In: Sodeman WA Jr, Sodeman WA, eds. Pathologic Physiology: Mechanisms of Disease. Philadelphia: WB

02 Oct 2021 at 22:45:58 at 2021 Oct 02 Saunders; 1974:457–72. 4. See note 2, Beauchamp, Walters 1994:431–512. , on on , 5. Mathewes-Green F. Dignity, always dignity. World Magazine 1995 Feb 18; available at http://www.theologymatters.com/TMIssues/Mayjun97.pdf (last accessed 15 Jul 2007). “Unpublished observations” and “personal communications” should not appear in the

references, but should be inserted in parentheses in the text. 170.106.35.93 Quotations: Extensive quotations should be set off in a separate paragraph with double indentation. Short quotations remain in the running text, enclosed in double quotation marks. When quoting another author, always indicate the specific source page number in . IP address: address: IP . the corresponding endnote.

Abbreviations: Avoid abbreviations in the title. The full term for which an abbreviation stands should precede its first use in the text.

MANUSCRIPT SUBMISSION. Manuscript submissions should be sent to Thomasine Kushner, Ph.D. To facilitate review, manuscripts are to be submitted as electronic copy, preferably in MS Word, and addressed to: [email protected]. Before manuscripts can be considered for review, they must meet the standard requirements of written academic

https://www.cambridge.org/core English. Author(s) should state, in a covering letter, that the material has not been previously published elsewhere nor submitted for publication elsewhere. Authors should also disclose financial or other relationships that might lead to a conflict of interest.

form, transferring copyright of the article to the publisher. Downloaded from from Downloaded Contents continued from back cover

Departments and Columns

Pathographies: Voices of Illness Obbligato

Mark Osteen 671 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180117000032 . . CN Reviews Parental Responsibility in the Context of Neuroscience and Genetics, by Kristien Hens, Daniela Cutas, and Dorothee Horstkötter Reviewed by Arianna Manzini, Rose Mortimer, and Ilina Singh 681 Ethics in Child Health: Principles and Cases in Neurodisability, by Peter L. Rosenbaum, Gabriel M. Ronen, Bernard Dan, Jennifer Johannesen, and Eric Racine

https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Reviewed by Michael Shevell 686 Responses and Dialogue Closed-Loop Medical Devices Might Reduce Iatrogenic Loss of Autonomous Action Selection Omar F.F. Odish and Martijn Beudel 688 A Reply to “The Effects of Closed-Loop Medical Devices on the Autonomy and Accountability of Persons and Systems,” by Philipp Kellmeyer, Thomas Cochrane, Oliver Müller, Christine Mitchell, Tonio Ball, Joseph J. Fins, and Nikola Biller-Andorno (CQ 25(4)) A Hauntingly Familiar Scenario Catherine Madison 691 A Reply to “Dementia, Advance Directives, and

, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at at available use, of terms Core Cambridge the to subject , Discontinuity of Personality,” by Joseph P . DeMarco and Samuel H. LiPuma (CQ 25(4)) What Do I Do Now? The Case: “I Have to Ace These Exams, or I’ll Crater Law School” 693 Commentary: Cognitive Enhancement: Are the Claims 02 Oct 2021 at 22:45:58 at 2021 Oct 02 of Critics “Good Enough”?

, on on , Vojin Rakic´ 693 Commentary: Care, Choice, and the Ethical Imagination

Fred B. Ketchum 698 170.106.35.93 Commentary: Aiding or Abetting? Responding to a Request for Cognitive Enhancement

William S. Andereck 700 . IP address: address: IP . Commentary: Just Say “No” Hervé Chneiweiss 701 In Memoriam From Bench to Bedside in Neuropsychology: Professor Glyn W. Humphreys’ Legacy

Nele Demeyere 705 https://www.cambridge.org/core

Best Practices Guidelines for Publishing in the Bioethics Literature Downloaded from from Downloaded CONTENTS

Contributors 521

From the Editors

Neuroethics: Cashing the Reality Check https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180117000032

. . Thomasine Kushner and James Giordano 524 Two Hemispheres Subdural Hematoma: From Inside and Out Grant Gillett 527 Articles

Ethical and Legal Implications of the Methodological VOLUME 26 Crisis in Neuroimaging NUMBER 4 Philipp Kellmeyer 530 OCTOBER 2017 https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Locked Out: Ignorance and Responsibility in Brain–Computer Interface Communication in Locked-in Syndrome Veronica Johansson, Surjo R. Soekadar, and Jens Clausen 555 Do Chimeras have Minds? The Ethics of Clinical Research on a Human–Animal Brain Model Benjamin Capps 577 Research Domain Criteria as Psychiatric Nosology: Conceptual, Practical, and Neuroethical Implications Faisal Akram and James Giordano 592 Pesticides: A Case Domain for Environmental Neuroethics Laura Y. Cabrera 602 Effaced Enigmata: When Ethics Precedes Neuroscience , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at at available use, of terms Core Cambridge the to subject , Grant Gillett 616 Practical Implications of the Minimally Conscious State Diagnosis in Adults Karola V. Kreitmair and Katherine E. Kruse 628

Continuing the Conversation 02 Oct 2021 at 22:45:58 at 2021 Oct 02 Deep Brain Stimulation, Authenticity and Value , on on , Jonathan Pugh, Hannah Maslen, and Julian Savulescu 640 Deep Brain Stimulation, Authenticity and Value: Further Reflections

170.106.35.93 Sven Nyholm and Elizabeth O’Neill 658 . IP address: address: IP .

Contents continued

https://www.cambridge.org/core Cambridge Core For further information about this journal please go to the journal website at:

cambridge.org/cqh Downloaded from from Downloaded