The Views of Clergy Regarding Ethical Controversies in Care at the End of Life

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Accepted Manuscript The Views of Clergy Regarding Ethical Controversies in Care at the End of Life Michael J. Balboni, Ph.D., Th.M., M.Div., Adam Sullivan, Ph.D., Patrick T. Smith, M.Div., Ph.D., Danish Zaidi, M.T.S., M.B.E., Christine Mitchell, R.N., M.S., M.T.S., James A. Tulsky, M.D., Daniel Sulmasy, M.D., Ph.D., Tyler J. VanderWeele, Ph.D., Tracy A. Balboni, M.D., M.P.H. PII: S0885-3924(17)30366-4 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.05.009 Reference: JPS 9512 To appear in: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management Received Date: 24 February 2017 Revised Date: 19 April 2017 Accepted Date: 9 May 2017 Please cite this article as: Balboni MJ, Sullivan A, Smith PT, Zaidi D, Mitchell C, Tulsky JA, Sulmasy D, VanderWeele TJ, Balboni TA, The Views of Clergy Regarding Ethical Controversies in Care at the End of Life, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.05.009. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT TITLE: The Views of Clergy Regarding Ethical Controversies in Care at the End of Life Corresponding Author: Michael J. Balboni, Ph.D., Th.M., M.Div. Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA Initiative on Health, Religion, and Spirituality within Harvard, Boston, MA [email protected] 339-226-2633 Adam Sullivan, Ph.D. Department of Biostatistics Brown University, Providence, RI [email protected] Patrick T. Smith, M.Div., Ph.D. Harvard Medical School Center for Bioethics, Boston, MA [email protected] MANUSCRIPT Danish Zaidi, M.T.S., M.B.E. Harvard Medical School Center for Bioethics, Boston, MA [email protected] Christine Mitchell, R.N., M.S., M.T.S. Harvard Medical School Center for Bioethics, Boston, MA [email protected] James A. Tulsky, M.D. Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA Division of Palliative Medicine. Department of Medicine Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA [email protected] Daniel Sulmasy, M.D., Ph.D. University of Chicago Medical and Divinity Schools, Chicago, IL [email protected] 1 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

CECA COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES May 17, 2012 PRESENT
CECA COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES May 17, 2012 PRESENT ABSENT Armand Antommaria Jack Gallagher Art Derse Christine Mitchell Bob Baker (Code liaison) Nneka Mokwunye Ken Berkowitz Tia Powell Jeffrey Berger Marty Smith Joseph Carrese Brian Childs Paula Goodman-Crews Ann Heesters Martha Jurchak Kayhan Parsi Kathy Powderly Terry Rosell Wayne Shelton Jeffrey Spike Anita Tarzian (chair) Lucia Wocial Pearls & Pitfalls paper The “HCEC PEARLS AND PITFALLS”: Suggested Do’s And Don’ts for Health Care Ethics Consultants” manuscript has been accepted by JCE. JCE will retain the copyright for the full article, but the Pearls & Pitfalls themselves can be posted on ASBH website and used by others (with appropriate citation). Timing of the publication has not yet been established. Joe mentioned the statement in the current manuscript that readers can provide feedback about the paper on the ASBH website. Kayhan mentioned that ASBH’s website is currently undergoing revision, and will check with Chris Welber at AMC regarding the ability to have visitors post feedback on a specific location of the website. The manuscript will be modified accordingly before publication to match website capacity. Update from Board The Board is asking that CECA submit the Request for Proposals that was previously put on hold pending the Quality Attestation efforts underway. The Board has decided to pursue both activities in parallel. Anita will circulate the current RFP draft to CECA members to identify a process for completing this and submitting to the Board. The Board is developing operating standards for ASBH standing committees, which will impact CECA’s recent discussion about term limits and member rotation.
[Show full text]
Position on Bioethics
Position on Bioethics Background Bioethics refers to the application of ethical principles to address potential ethical questions arising from biological research, science and medicine. Bioethics may include ethical dimensions of medical research, clinical trials, use of different forms of technology in healthcare, public policy, prioritization of research and resources, and much more. For any company involved in healthcare, bioethics questions frequently arise and require resolutions based on accepted bioethics principles. The four commonly accepted principles of bioethics1 are: • Autonomy: Requires that the patient have autonomy of thought, intention and action when making decisions regarding healthcare procedures and must give fully informed consent with knowledge of all risks and benefits of the procedure and the likelihood of success. • Justice: Requires that procedures uphold the spirit of existing laws and are fair to all players involved, ensuring that no population be overly burdened or overly valued in research and scientific progress. • Beneficence: Requires that the procedure be provided with the intent of doing good for the patient involved, considers individual circumstances of all patients and strives for net benefit. • Non-maleficence: Requires that a procedure does not harm the patient involved or others in society. Relevance Bioethics plays a critical role in the advancement of human health by ensuring safe, ethical and just applications of new science and technological and therapeutic breakthroughs. As the world’s largest and most broadly based healthcare company, reaching patients and consumers each day with our medicines, consumer care products and medical devices, Johnson & Johnson is a leader in healthcare research and development. We employ significant resources in the development of new medicines and medical devices and their application.
[Show full text]
Top 50 Bioethics Journals and Top 250 Most Cited Bioethics Articles Since 2011, 2016 Edition May 23, 2016 | BRL Blog, Featured
U a Top 50 Bioethics Journals and Top 250 Most Cited Bioethics Articles Since 2011, 2016 Edition May 23, 2016 | BRL Blog, Featured This 2016 edition of the “top bioethics journals and articles” list includes updated rankings for bioethics journals and new citation metrics for articles published in 2015, as well as updates for previous years’ top articles. Links to the publisher pages are included for each article as well as links to their citation page on Google Scholar. The average H5 index for the top fifty-two journals is 13.38, with a tied high of 28 and a minimum of 6. Here are the top top 52 journals and 252 most cited articles from the top bioethics journals published in 2009 through 2015. View the Top Articles by Year: 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011. About this Analysis This is an updated citation analysis for 2011 through 2015 of the top 100 bioethics journals. I’ve included the top 50 journals and the top cited articles per year including the h5 ranking. Just over 20,000 articles were analyzed in this dataset, shared here as a spreadsheet. If you’re interested in using this study in a publication or presentation please let me know so I can share a link to your research on this blog post. I utilized Harzing’s Publish or Perish software over a period of 10 days to gather this new data in May, 2016. The citation metrics are from Google Scholar’s index. Author: Mark Hakkarinen, M.A. Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University.
[Show full text]
Informed Consent and Refusal
CHAPTER 3 Informed Consent and Refusal Evolution of the doctrine of informed consent Elements of informed consent and refusal The nature of informed consent Exceptions to the consent requirement Mrs. Stack is a 67- year- old woman admitted with rectal bleeding, chronic renal in- sufficiency, diabetes, and blindness. On admission, she was alert and capacitated. Two weeks later, she suffered a cardiopulmonary arrest, was resuscitated and intu- bated, and was transferred to the medical intensive care unit (MICU) in an unrespon- sive and unstable state. Consent for emergency dialysis was obtained from her son, who is also her health care agent. Dialysis was repeated two days later. During the past several years, Mrs. Stack has consistently stated to her family and her primary care doctor that she would never want to be on chronic dialysis and she has refused it numerous times when it was recommended. The physician, who has known and treated Mrs. Stack for many years, also treated her daughter who had been on chronic dialysis for some time and had died after suffering a heart attack. According to the physician and the patient’s family, Mrs. Stack’s refusal of dialysis has been based on her conviction that her daughter died as a result of the dialysis treatments. Mrs. Stack’s mental status has cleared considerably and, despite the ventilator, she is able to communicate nonverbally. Although she appears to understand the benefits of dialysis and the consequences of refusing it, including deterioration and eventual death, she has consistently and vehemently refused further treatments. Her capacity to make this decision is not now in question.
[Show full text]
How to Think About Wild Animal Suffering
How to Think About Wild Animal Suffering ! m a g e + J i m b o o m b a P o l i c e , T h e T i m e s ( A free lecture by Dale Jamieson, PhD Professor of Environmental Studies and Philosophy, New York University Director, Center for Environmental and Animal Protection Monday, February 3rd, 4:00 – 5:20 p.m. David Strong Building, Rm. # C126 It has been widely reported that more than a billion animals have been killed in Australia in the fires that have been raging since late last year. The Australian grandmother who risked her life to save a Koala from a burning tree is widely seen as a hero. Yet in the normal course of events billions of animals die every day (including about 150 million for food). Are we obliged to do what we can to save them all? The logic of at least some animal protection philosophies seems to say “yes:” We should eliminate suffering whenever and wherever we can, whether it is caused by human action, by the predation of one animal on another, or by the impersonal workings of nature. But to many environmentalists and others, this vision of “policing nature” seems mad or worse. Questions about wild animal suffering not only threaten to disrupt alliances between animal protectionists and environmentalist, but go to the very heart of what it is to be human living in a natural world. While I do not purport to provide the correct answers to the many questions in this area, I do hope to clarify some of the issues and contribute to thinking clearly about them.
[Show full text]
Informed Consent
Christine Grady Department of Bioethics NIH Clinical Center The views expressed here are mine and do not necessarily represent those of the CC, NIH, or Department of Health and Human Services Informed consent is the bedrock principle on which most of modern research ethics rest…This was at the heart of the crucial ethical provision stated in the first words of the Nuremberg Code, and it remains equally compelling a half century later. Menikoff J, Camb Quarterly 2004 p 342 Authorization of an activity based on understanding what the activity entails. A legal, regulatory, and ethical requirement in health care and in most research with human subjects A process of reasoned decision making (not a form or an episode) One aspect of conducting ethical clinical research “Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what will be done with his body… Justice Cardozo, 1914 Respect for autonomy or for an individual’s capacity and right to define own goals and make choices consistent with those goals. Well entrenched in American values, jurisprudence, medical practice, and clinical research. “Informed consent is rooted in the fundamental recognition…that adults are entitled to accept or reject health care interventions on the basis of their own personal values and in furtherance of their own personal goals” Presidents Commission for the study of ethical problems…1982 Informed consent in medical practice …informed consent in clinical practice is frequently inadequate… Physicians receive little training… Misunderstand requirements and legal standards… Time pressures and competing demands… Patient comprehension is often poor… Recent studies have demonstrated improvement in patient understanding of risks after communication interventions Schenker et al 2010; Matiasek et al.
[Show full text]
Tables of Contents
The Journal of Clinical Ethics: Tables of Contents 2020 Winter 2020, Volume 31, Number 4 AT THE BEDSIDE Beyond Shared Decision Making Edmund G. Howe COVID-19 Developing a Triage Protocol for the COVID-19 Pandemic: Allocating Scarce Medical Resources in a Public Health Emergency Benjamin Tolchin, Stephen R. Latham, Lori Bruce, Lauren E. Ferrante, Katherine Kraschel, Karen Jubanyik, Sarah C. Hull, Jennifer L. Herbst, Jennifer Kapo, Ernest D. Moritz, John Hughes, Mark D. Siegel, and Mark R. Mercurio Micro and Macro Ethical Considerations of COVID-19 Amitai Etzioni FEATURES Helping Children Hurt Themselves: Why Pediatricians Ought to Support Adolescent Football Players in Their Athletic Goals Ruth Tallman The Pediatrician’s Moral Obligation to Counsel Directively Against Youth Tackle Football Lainie Friedman Ross The Compromising Interpretive Model as a Harm Reduction Strategy for Families that Have Chosen High School Football Ruth Tallman Living in the Hospital: The Vulnerability of Children with Chronic Critical Illness Alexandra R. Ruth, Renee D. Boss, Pamela K. Donohue, Miriam C. Shapiro, Jessica C. Raisanen, and Carrie M. Hen- derson Psychiatric Advance Directives as an Ethical Communication Tool: An Analysis of Definitions Billy Table, Jaime Thomas, and Virginia A. Brown Moral Distress: A Framework for Offering Relief through Debrief Shilpa Shashidhara and Shaylona Kirk CLINICAL ETHICS TRAINING Do Clinical Ethics Fellowships Prepare Trainees for Their First Jobs? A National Survey of Former Clini- cal Ethics Fellows Robert M. Guerin, Douglas S. Diekema, Sabahat Hizlan, and Kathryn L. Weise The Making of a Clinical Ethicist: A Personal Tribute to Al Jonsen Ruchika Mishra Remembering Al Jonsen Edmund G.
[Show full text]
Code Gray.Pub
Written by Christine Mitchell, RN, FAAN and Ben Achtenberg with a historical commentary by Susan Reverby, PhD and assistance from Joan Sawyer and Karen Wolf, RN, MS Contents INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 3 Background ............................................................................................3 Synopsis of the Film ..............................................................................3 Suggested Uses .......................................................................................4 Scheduling ..............................................................................................4 FILM AS A TOOL FOR DISCUSSION .......................................................4 WHAT IS NURSING ETHICS? ...................................................................5 GLOSSARY ...................................................................................................5 SOME GENERAL DISCUSSION QUESTIONS ........................................6 CASE 1: BENEFICENCE ............................................................................7 Description of the Case .........................................................................7 The Principle: Beneficence ...................................................................7 Questions for Discussion ......................................................................8 CASE 2: AUTONOMY ................................................................................9 Description
[Show full text]
Bioethics and Informed Consent
Bioethics and Informed Consent Professor Lucy Allais Informed consent is a central notion in bioethics. The emphasis on informed consent in medical practice is relatively recent (20th century). Bioethics is a relatively young field, beginning, in the USA, in the 50s and 60s, maturing in the 80s and 90s. This is different to both medical ethics, and ethics generally. Medical ethics Reflections by doctors and societies on the ethics of medical practice is probably as old as doctoring (Hippocratic oath; the Code of Hammurabi, written in Babylon in 1750 BC). Traditionally focused on the doctor-patient relationship and the virtues possessed by the good doctor. (Kuhse and Singer A Companion to Bioethics 2001:4). Ethics in philosophy: Morality: how should we live? what is right? what is wrong? Ethics: the academic study of morality. Are there objective values? Are there truths about right and wrong? What makes actions wrong? How do we resolve moral disputes? What is the basis of human rights? When (if ever) is euthanasia permissible? Is it morally justifiable to incarcerate MDR TB patients? “in 1972, no American medical school thought medical ethics important enough to be taught to all future physicians.... A decade later, in 1984—after the advent of bioethics—84 percent of medical schools required students to take a course in medical ethics or bioethics during their first two years of instruction.” (Baker 2013) The four core values of autonomy, justice, beneficence and non-maleficence. Autonomy often dominates discussions of bioethics. 6 Informed consent is linked to autonomy. Autonomy means being self-governing. Autonomy is often thought to be at the basis of human rights: human rights protect the capacities of each individual to live their life for themself.
[Show full text]
The Bakhtin Circle and Ancient Narrative, 297–319 298 CHRISTINE MITCHELL in Reading Both the Cyropaedia and 1–2 Chronicles
Bakhtin and the Ideal Ruler in 1–2 Chronicles and the Cyropaedia CHRISTINE MITCHELL St. Andrew’s College Saskatoon, Canada Introduction When we turn to a study of ancient Hebrew narrative, most readers prefer the engaging and artful narratives of Samuel and Kings to the seemingly plod- ding and pedantic narrative of Chronicles. Recently, however, Chronicles has enjoyed a minor surge of interest. As plodding and pedantic as Chroni- cles may be, perhaps as boring as Chronicles may be, it is plodding, pedan- tic, and boring for interesting reasons. It may be instructive to compare the narrative of Chronicles to the narrative of Xenophon’s Cyropaedia, also known as ‘one of the most tedious books to have survived classical antiq- uity’ (Gera 1993, vii). In this essay, I propose to do exactly that. However, both Chronicles and the Cyropaedia are large, sprawling works, composed of a number of themes and topics. In this essay, therefore, I will limit myself to an examination of the intertextual construction of the figure of the ideal ruler in both books. I will do so, using a theory of intertex- tuality based on Bakhtin’s notion of the dialogic. I will also come to certain conclusions about the genre of both works, an understanding of ‘political philosophy’ as a genre, also based on Bakhtin’s ideas about genre. Further- more, in order to fully understand the text of Chronicles, especially, I will be using the work of Yuri Lotman on textuality. Bakhtin, dialogism and genre In this essay, it is not my intention to provide a roadmap of dialogism or genre in Bakhtin’s thought; in any case, there are plenty of others who have taken on that task.
[Show full text]
Social and Ethical Challenges of HBP
Social and Ethical Challenges of HBP ! Abdul H. Mohammed Linnaeus University and Karolinska Institutet Växjö and Stockholm , Sweden 1st HBP School, Alpbach, Austria, September 8 – 14, 2014 SP12 Ethics and Society Jean-Pierre Changeux (dir.) Kathinka Evers (dir) Institut Pasteur, France Uppsala University Nikolas Rose Abdul Mhammed King’s College London, UK Linaneus University, Sweden Bernd Carsten Stahl Yadin Dudai De Montfort University, Leicester, UK Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel Lars Kluve Kevin Grimes Danish Board of Technology, Denmark Karolinska Institute, Sweden Christine Mitchell Barbara Sahakian Harvard Medicla School, USA Cambridge University, UK Richard Walker Benjamin Simmenauer EPFL, Switzerland Institut Pasteur, France Ethics • ”In a civilized life law ﬂoats in a sea of ethics” • Earl Warren, (1891 – 1974) • You can turn away from ethical questions, but they will not go away • Ethical dilemma – morally problematic situation, where you have to pick between two or more acceptable but often opposing alternatives that are important to different groups. (”right-versus-right” decision) Neuroethics • Encompasses a wide array of ethical issues emerging from different branches of clinical neuroscience (neurology, psychiatry, psychopharmacology) and basic neuroscience (cognitive neuroscience, affective neuroscience). • These include ethical problems raised by advances in functional neuroimaging, brain implants and brain- machine interfaces and psychopharmacology as well as by our growing understanding of the neural bases of behavior personality, consciousness …http://neuroethics.upenn.edu/ The goals of the HBP ethics and society pillar: to explore the project’s social, ethical and philosophical implications, to promote engagement with decision-makers and the general public, to promote social and ethical awareness among project participants, and to ensure that the project is governed in a way that ensures full compliance with relevant legal and ethical norms.
[Show full text]
Topics List for Bioethics
Topics List for Bioethics Cells Use of stem cells Use of patient cells for cell lines (who owns the cells and discoveries made with them?) Characteristics of Life/Death Termination of care for anencephalic infants Definitions of death in relation to terminating life Assisted suicide for the terminally ill Artificially sustaining and prolonging life Environmental Ethics Fair allocation/use of resources Intrinsic value of species Genetics Privacy of genetic information Ownership of genetic information (patenting) Genetic modification of bacteria, plants, animals, or humans Genetic modification of food Gene therapy Genetic testing issues Personal responsibility and genetic determinism (how much is your behavior due to your genes?) Human Biology/Organ Systems Use of growth hormone (therapy vs. enhancement) Use of steroids Xenotransplantation (transplantation of animal parts to humans) Organ transplantation Combining humans and computers (what makes us human?) Microbiology Compulsory vaccination Quarantine for infectious individuals Reproduction Eugenics Use of Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis, either to select for or against certain traits Reproductive cloning of humans Cloning of animals and plants Sex selection Having one child to save another Research Ethics Use of humans for clinical trials (testing new treatments, devices, or drugs) Human testing in vulnerable populations or in less developed countries Use of animals in medical research, dissection, or in testing of personal care products Appropriate use of genetic material sampled from indigenous populations Other Health care justice Drugs, children, and behavior control Race (definition, value, use of genetic difference in medical treatment) Gender (definition, value) 138.
[Show full text]