Space, Delphi and the Construction of the Greek Past in Plutarch's Greek Questions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Space, Delphi and the Construction of the Greek Past in Plutarch's Greek Questions Katerina Oikonomopoulou Space, Delphi and the construction of the Greek past in Plutarch’s Greek Questions Abstract: This chapter explores the concept of relative/relational space in Plutarch’s collection of Greek Questions. It argues thatspace, rather than geography, provides a key vantage point from which we can interpret the collection’smain themes, and un- derstand the ways in which it attemptstolink the past with the present.The chapter identifieskey spatial experiences that are described within the Greek Questions’ aeti- ologies (such as land journey,sea voyage,colonisation, migration), and discusses their role in problematising specific aspects of social or political life in the early Greek past (which,within the work, spans mythical times, pre-polis and early polis history). It concludes thatthe Greek Questions aligns itself with attitudes to the Greek past found elsewhere in Plutarch’swritings(especiallyinthe Pythian dia- logues), and which are concernedespeciallywith the negative role civil strife, inter- state conflict and political fragmentation playedinGreek affairs. The chapter con- cludes with adiscussion of how the special role the enquiries assign to the Oracle of Delphi confirms this picture, giventhat Delphi seems to function as asortof hub, but not as apowerful panhellenic centre. The Greek Questions: spaceversus geography Plutarch’scollection of Greek Questions comprises atotal of 59 aetiological enquiries on the traditions of various Greek communities.The format of these enquiriesisstan- dard: almost all are introducedwith the interrogative pronouns τίς/τί…,and as arule they focus on the meaningofspecific terms or titles.¹ The formulation is such (the main verb ἐστί is usuallyimplied)thatitallows us to infer that the terms or titles in question wereinuse in various Greek citiesduring Plutarch’stime.For example, the question ‘Who is the πωλήτης (‘Seller’)among the Epidamnians?’ (Greek Ques- tions 29) implies that the title ‘Seller’ was usedofaperson in the city of Epidamnus duringthe High RomanEmpire.² The answer then explains the meaningofsuch terms or titles by tracing their origins back to local versions of mythical stories,or to events (such as migration and colonisation) that took place in the earlyhistory of the Greek city-states.Itispresumed thatPlutarch, in compilingthe collection, widelydrew on the Peripatetictradition of cities’ Constitutions,although it is also clear that,atleast in part,herelied on personal research into local customs and tra- Payen(1998) 40 –49;Preston (2001) 95–97. Halliday(1928)138–139;Payen (1998) 44;Boulogne(2002)411. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110539479-010 Brought to you by | University of Groningen Authenticated Download Date | 11/30/17 11:58 PM 108 KaterinaOikonomopoulou ditions.³ At anyrate, the lexicalfocus, and the role of aetiologyasameans of con- necting the past with the present (‘present’ understood as the imperial Graeco- Roman world in which Plutarch lived) are the most distinctive markers of the collec- tion as awhole.⁴ Another key feature, whose importance for the interpretation of the Greek Que- stions was first highlighted by Pascal Payen, is geography:indeed, Plutarch’ssample of Greek cities seems to have been deliberatelyselected so as to draw attentionto remoteorprovincial places,and at the same time underline theirgeographicaldif- fusion, across different regions of the Greek peninsula, the Greek islands, the Asia Minor coast,Southern Italy, and Cyprus.⁵ ForPayen, this diffusion is to be contrasted with the focus on the imperial city of Rome in the Roman Questions (a collection which, as he rightlyargues, is closelyrelated to the Greek Questions),⁶ and, among other things, puts the stress on the durability of centuries-old local Greek traditions (surviving mostlyoutside the centres of Hellenism), despite the eventual predomi- nance of imperial power in the wider Mediterranean region. In thischapter Ipropose that we payclose attention to the Greek Questions’ portray- als of space, rather thangeography. This is becausegeographical landmarks (rivers, roads, thecoast), despite thefact that they frequentlyfeatureinthe collection’sexpla- nations,are notpart of objectivedescriptionsofspace. Further,Plutarch does notexploit the geographical theme in order to achievesomesortofcohesivepresentation for the materialthat he has collected: he couldhavegroupedthe aetiologiestogether by region, for example, or employedthe theme of theland journey or seavoyage, along the course of which the different Greek cities or communities could have featuredasstops.⁷ Instead, the haphazardorder in which the different Greekcities or communities arediscussed encourages aperception of them as independent microcosms,each one with its own lin- guistic idioms,local culture, history, and religious life.⁸ In thiscontext,geographical landmarks arementioned because they areimportant to peoples’ or communities’ expe- riences of theplaces in which theyliveand act—experiences which encompasspast as well as present events.The explanations’ spatial references thus servetochart arich di- versity of economic,socio-political andreligious activities that shaped individual Greek communities’ cultural identityacrosstime. Contemporary cultural geographers utilise the notions of ‘relative/relational space’ in order to conceptualise this fluid relationship of people to spaces.The con- cept of relative space refers to one’ssubjective experience of space: depending on the type of activities he or she engages in, ahuman agent might perceive space(for ex- ample,distance) in different terms.The concept of relational space, in turn, refers to Giesen (1901); Halliday(1928)13–15. On the Greek Questions’ format,see Preston (2001) 95–97. Payen(1998) 49–54;Boulogne (2002) 183–185. Payen(1998) 39–40;see also Harrison (2000) and Boulogne (2002) 183–185. Cf. Hutton (2005a) 54–126, on Pausanias. Payen(1998) 49–54. Brought to you by | University of Groningen Authenticated Download Date | 11/30/17 11:58 PM Space, Delphi and the construction of the Greek past in Plutarch’s Greek Questions 109 the ways in which relations (what is meant by thatisthe full rangeofsocio-economic and culturalactivities of human agents) help shape the meaning and significance spaces carry on the collective level. Relative/relational space is thus contrasted to ab- solutespace,which is the space thatthe geographer can measure in objectiveterms, calculatingdistances,oridentifying and describingimportant landmarks.⁹ According to this model, an understanding of how,within the Greek Questions,space is per- ceivedand livedcan shed helpful light on the terms in which the collection concep- tualises keyaspectsofthe earlyGreek past (in terms of politics, society,economy, or religion), as well as clarify what kind of historical or cultural assessment of the early Greek world it might have invitedits imperial readers to make, consideringits differ- ences from their own imperial realities. Spatial experiencewithin the Greek Questions In the Tablebelow Ihaveattempted to make adistinction between different ways in which spaceappears to be experienced by theGreek communities which featurein the different aetiologies.Itshould be noted that thedifferent types of spatial experience that Idistinguish arebynomeans watertight, butinfact overlap: for example, as we will see, expulsions or migrations usuallyinvolve some kind of land journey or seavoyage. Preciselybecauseofthis,however,they help us conceptualise the multiple, intersecting ways in which spaceoperates as akey field of human activity within the collection. Types of spatialexperienceChapterswithin the Greek Questions Overland journey , , , , , , Seavoyage , , , , , , , , , , Migration , , , , Exileorexpulsion , , , , , , , , , , , Colonisation , , , , , Interstatewar and militaryexpeditions , , , , , , , , , , , , Privateand public space , Pre-polis formations (settlements κατὰ κώμας) , Religious spaces (shrines, burial grounds) , , , , , , , , , Trade, piracy,plunder,farming , , , , , , Let us consider some characteristic case-studies which will help illuminatesome of the main issues involved. My first example is Greek Question 2(291E–F, transl.F.C. Babbitt,Loeb): See Warf (2010); see also Thalmann (2011) 14– 41,onrelational spaceinApollonius of Rhodes.On other methodological approaches to spaceinancient Greek literature, see also Purves (2010), esp. 1– 23,Gilhulyand Worman (2014). On narratological approaches to spaceinPlutarch’s Lives,see Beck (2012)and in this volume. See also the Introductiontothis volume. Brought to you by | University of Groningen Authenticated Download Date | 11/30/17 11:58 PM 110 Katerina Oikonomopoulou Who is the ‘woman whorides on adonkey at Cumae’?(Τίςἡπαρὰ Κυμαίοις ὀνοβάτις;) Any woman taken in adultery they used to bringinto the agora and set her on acertain stonein plain sight of everyone. In likemanner they then proceeded to mount her upon adonkey, and when she had been led about the circuit of the entirecity,she was required again to take her stand upon the same stone, and for the rest of her life to continue in disgrace,bearing the name ‘donkey-rider’.Afterthis ceremony they believed that the stone was unclean and they used rituallytopurify it. Punishmentsfor adultery committedbywomen (usually death) aresomething of a topos in imperial Graeco-Romanmiscellanisticcompilations.¹⁰ Theparticularpunish- ment that is describedherereveals that,inthe close-knit communitiesthatcomprised theworld of theGreek city-state, privateconduct wasanobjectofintense
Recommended publications
  • The Date of the First Pythiad-Again Alden A
    MOSSHAMMER, ALDEN A., The Date of the First Pythiad - Again , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 23:1 (1982:Spring) p.15 The Date of the First Pythiad-Again Alden A. Mosshammer OST HISTORIANS have long agreed that the first in the regular M series of Pythian festivals celebrated every four years at Del­ phi took place in 58211. Now H. C. Bennett and more re­ cently S. G. Miller have argued that we should instead follow Pausa­ nias in dating the first Pythiad to 586/5, because the Pindaric scho­ liasts, they maintain, reckon Pythiads from that year. 1 The debate is an old one, but it has important implications for our understanding of the sequence of events at the time of the First Sacred War. Bennett and Miller have rightly criticized the excessive claims that have been made for some of the evidence; and Miller, in particular, has offered some important new insights into the problem. The argument in favor of 58211 nevertheless remains the stronger case. It needs to be presented once again, both to take these new objections into account and to elucidate the tradition that has given rise to the debate. I. The Problem According to the Parian Marble, our earliest evidence (264/3), the Amphictyons celebrated a victory against Cirrha by dedicating a por­ tion of the spoils as prizes for a chrematitic festival celebrated in 59110, and again the games became stephani tic in 582/1. 2 Pausanias 1 H. C. BENNETT, "On the Systemization of Scholia Dates for Pindar's Pythian Odes," HSCP 62 (1957) 61-78; STEPHEN G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography
    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
    [Show full text]
  • Download The
    THE CONCEPT OF SACRED WAR IN ANCIENT GREECE By FRANCES ANNE SKOCZYLAS B.A., McGill University, 1985 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Classics) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA August 1987 ® Frances Anne Skoczylas, 1987 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of CLASSICS The University of British Columbia 1956 Main Mall Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Y3 Date AUtt-UST 5r 1Q87 ii ABSTRACT This thesis will trace the origin and development of the term "Sacred War" in the corpus of extant Greek literature. This term has been commonly applied by modern scholars to four wars which took place in ancient Greece between- the sixth and fourth centuries B. C. The modern use of "the attribute "Sacred War" to refer to these four wars in particular raises two questions. First, did the ancient historians give all four of these wars the title "Sacred War?" And second, what justified the use of this title only for certain conflicts? In order to resolve the first of these questions, it is necessary to examine in what terms the ancient historians referred to these wars.
    [Show full text]
  • Pausanias' Description of Greece
    BONN'S CLASSICAL LIBRARY. PAUSANIAS' DESCRIPTION OF GREECE. PAUSANIAS' TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH \VITTI NOTES AXD IXDEX BY ARTHUR RICHARD SHILLETO, M.A., Soiiii'tinie Scholar of Trinity L'olltge, Cambridge. VOLUME IT. " ni <le Fnusnnias cst un homme (jui ne mnnquo ni de bon sens inoins a st-s tlioux." hnniie t'oi. inais i}iii rn>it ou au voudrait croire ( 'HAMTAiiNT. : ftEOROE BELL AND SONS. YOUK STIIKKT. COVKNT (iAKDKX. 188t). CHISWICK PRESS \ C. WHITTINGHAM AND CO., TOOKS COURT, CHANCEKV LANE. fA LC >. iV \Q V.2- CONTEXTS. PAGE Book VII. ACHAIA 1 VIII. ARCADIA .61 IX. BtEOTIA 151 -'19 X. PHOCIS . ERRATA. " " " Volume I. Page 8, line 37, for Atte read Attes." As vii. 17. 2<i. (Catullus' Aft is.) ' " Page 150, line '22, for Auxesias" read Anxesia." A.-> ii. 32. " " Page 165, lines 12, 17, 24, for Philhammon read " Philanimon.'' " " '' Page 191, line 4, for Tamagra read Tanagra." " " Pa ire 215, linu 35, for Ye now enter" read Enter ye now." ' " li I'aijf -J27, line 5, for the Little Iliad read The Little Iliad.'- " " " Page ^S9, line 18, for the Babylonians read Babylon.'' " 7 ' Volume II. Page 61, last line, for earth' read Earth." " Page 1)5, line 9, tor "Can-lira'" read Camirus." ' ; " " v 1'age 1 69, line 1 , for and read for. line 2, for "other kinds of flutes "read "other thites.'' ;< " " Page 201, line 9. for Lacenian read Laeonian." " " " line 10, for Chilon read Cliilo." As iii. 1H. Pago 264, " " ' Page 2G8, Note, for I iad read Iliad." PAUSANIAS. BOOK VII. ACIIAIA.
    [Show full text]
  • Parnassus, Delphi, and the Thyiades Mcinerney, Jeremy Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Fall 1997; 38, 3; Proquest Pg
    Parnassus, Delphi, and the Thyiades McInerney, Jeremy Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Fall 1997; 38, 3; ProQuest pg. 263 Parnassus, Delphi, and the Thyiades Jeremy McInerney AN INTERNATIONAL SANCTUARY, Delphi helped bring a­ bout the transition within the emerging poleis of the ~ Archaic period to what Fran~ois de Polignac has called a "more finished, <adult' stage of society and institutions. "1 Delphi's business was international in scope: the sanctuary was involved in colonization, arbitration, and panhellenism.2 Yet one important aspect of Delphi's emergence as a panhellenic sanc­ tuary rarely studied is the impact of this extraordinary status on the community of Delphi and its surrounding region. In this paper I propose that, as the sanctuary of Delphi came to repre­ sent order, conciliation, and mediation to the Greeks, the local topography of the region was made to reflect these same themes. Delphi and Mt Parnassus became, through myth and ritual, a landscape in which tensions between wildness and civilization-a polarity at the heart of the culture of the polis­ could be narrated, enacted, and organized. Delphi and Parnas­ sus stood for the polarities from which the polis was construc­ ted. On the one side was Delphi, representing the triumph of order over chaos, as expressed in the myth of the sanctuary's foundation, when Apollo destroys Pytho and brings culture to the original inhabitants of Parnassus (Strab. 9.3.12). On the other side was Mt Parnassus, the wilderness tamed by Apollo. These 1 F. de Polignac, UMediation, Competition, and Sovereignty: The Evolution of Rural Sanctuaries in Geometric Greece,» in S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Histories of Polybius Book Five Translated by Evelyn S. Shuckburgh
    The Histories of Polybius Book Five translated by Evelyn S. Shuckburgh ©In parentheses Publications Greek Series Cambridge, Ontario 2002 The Histories of Polybius Book Five 1. The year of office as Strategus of the younger Aratus had now come to an end with the rising of the Pleiades; for that was the arrangement of time then observed by the Achaeans.1 Accordingly he laid down his office and was succeeded in the command of the Achaeans by Eperatus; Dorimachus being still Strategus of the Aetolians. It was at the beginning of this summer that Hannibal entered upon open war with Rome; started from New Carthage; and crossing the Iber, definitely began his expedition and march into Italy; while the Romans despatched Tiberius Sempronius to Libya with an army, and Publius Cornelius to Iberia. This year, too, Antiochus and Ptolemy, abandoning diplomacy, and the support of their mutual claims upon Coele-Syria by negotiation, began actual war with each other. As for Philip, being in need of corn and money for his army, he summoned the Achaeans to a general assembly by means of their magistrates. When the assembly had met, according to the federal law, at Aegium,2 the king saw that Aratus and his son were indisposed to act for him, because of the intrigues against them in the matter of the election, which had been carried on by Apelles; and that Eperatus was naturally inefficient, and an object of general contempt. These facts convinced the king of the folly of Apelles and Leontius, and he once more decided to stand by Aratus.
    [Show full text]
  • Aneastervacationingreece 100
    AN EASTER VAC ATIO N G R EEC E WITH LISTS OF BOOKS ON GREEK TRAVEL AN D TOPOGRAPH Y AN D TIM E - TABLES OF GREEK STEAM ERS AN D RAI LWAYS ' BY W AN O H N ED IN S DY S LITT. D . J , ' H LLE E FE LLOW A N D T UTO R OF ST . jo N S CO G , A N D P UBLIC O RATO R I N T HE UN IVERSI TY OF CAM BRIDG E R E ND P O LYM P WITH A M AP O F G E C E, A A LAN O F IA ’ uacum ue in redim ur in ali ua Iz z storia vesti ium an imas Q q g , q g y ' ' ' C IC ERO ae Fz rz z bus v 2 , , 5 5 1, 0 a M A C M I L L A N A N D C O . A N D N E W Y O R K 1 8 8 7 A ll rights reserved vi PRE FA CE and dr th e e e as e e d iving, in mor ily acc ssibl istricts, without re so rting to the inte r ve ntion of a e de dragoman with his cavalcad of beasts of bur n , carrying a comple te canteen with beds and b ed — ding and provisions fo r the way a me thod of e e e w th e e e e e trav lling, how v r, hich , in g n ral abs nc d and th e one e fo r of roa s inns , is still only availabl ee e We e s ing many portions of th e int rior.
    [Show full text]
  • ATLAS of CLASSICAL HISTORY
    ATLAS of CLASSICAL HISTORY EDITED BY RICHARD J.A.TALBERT London and New York First published 1985 by Croom Helm Ltd Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2003. © 1985 Richard J.A.Talbert and contributors All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Atlas of classical history. 1. History, Ancient—Maps I. Talbert, Richard J.A. 911.3 G3201.S2 ISBN 0-203-40535-8 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-71359-1 (Adobe eReader Format) ISBN 0-415-03463-9 (pbk) Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data Also available CONTENTS Preface v Northern Greece, Macedonia and Thrace 32 Contributors vi The Eastern Aegean and the Asia Minor Equivalent Measurements vi Hinterland 33 Attica 34–5, 181 Maps: map and text page reference placed first, Classical Athens 35–6, 181 further reading reference second Roman Athens 35–6, 181 Halicarnassus 36, 181 The Mediterranean World: Physical 1 Miletus 37, 181 The Aegean in the Bronze Age 2–5, 179 Priene 37, 181 Troy 3, 179 Greek Sicily 38–9, 181 Knossos 3, 179 Syracuse 39, 181 Minoan Crete 4–5, 179 Akragas 40, 181 Mycenae 5, 179 Cyrene 40, 182 Mycenaean Greece 4–6, 179 Olympia 41, 182 Mainland Greece in the Homeric Poems 7–8, Greek Dialects c.
    [Show full text]
  • The History and Antiquities of the Doric Race Vol. 1
    The History And Antiquities Of The Doric Race Vol. 1 By Karl Otfried Müller The History And Antiquities Of The Doric Race Book I. History Of The Doric Race, From The Earliest Times To The End Of The Peloponnesian War. Chapter I. § 1. Earliest Settlement of the Dorians in Thessaly. § 2. Description of the Vale of Tempe. § 3. Of the Passes of Olympus. § 4. And of Hestiæotis. § 5. The Perrhæbians. § 6. The Lapithæ. § 7. Limits of the Territory in Thessaly occupied by the Dorians. § 8. Contents of the Epic Poem Ægimius. § 9. Doric Migration from Thessaly to Crete. § 10. Relation of the Dorians to the Macedonians. 1. “From early times the Dorians and Ionians were the chief races of the Grecian nation; the latter of Pelasgic, the former of Hellenic origin; the latter an aboriginal people, the former a people much addicted to wandering. For the former, when under the dominion of Deucalion, dwelt in Phthiotis; and in the time of Dorus, the son of Hellen, they inhabited the country at the foot of Ossa and Olympus, which was called Hestiæotis. Afterwards, however, being driven from Hestiæotis by the Cadmeans, they dwelt under mount Pindus, and were called the Macednian nation. From thence they again migrated to Dryopis; and having passed from Dryopis into Peloponnesus, they were called the Doric race.” This connected account cannot be considered as derived immediately from ancient tradition; but can only be viewed as an attempt of the father of history to arrange and reconcile various legends. Nor indeed is it difficult to discover and examine the steps of the argument which led him to this conclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • The History and Antiquities of the Doric Race, Vol. 1 of 2 by Karl Otfried Müller
    The Project Gutenberg EBook of The History and Antiquities of the Doric Race, Vol. 1 of 2 by Karl Otfried Müller This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at http://www.gutenberg.org/license Title: The History and Antiquities of the Doric Race, Vol. 1 of 2 Author: Karl Otfried Müller Release Date: September 17, 2010 [Ebook 33743] Language: English ***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE HISTORY AND ANTIQUITIES OF THE DORIC RACE, VOL. 1 OF 2*** The History and Antiquities Of The Doric Race by Karl Otfried Müller Professor in the University of Göttingen Translated From the German by Henry Tufnell, Esq. And George Cornewall Lewis, Esq., A.M. Student of Christ Church. Second Edition, Revised. Vol. I London: John Murray, Albemarle Street. 1839. Contents Extract From The Translators' Preface To The First Edition.2 Advertisement To The Second Edition. .5 Introduction. .6 Book I. History Of The Doric Race, From The Earliest Times To The End Of The Peloponnesian War. 22 Chapter I. 22 Chapter II. 39 Chapter III. 50 Chapter IV. 70 Chapter V. 83 Chapter VI. 105 Chapter VII. 132 Chapter VIII. 163 Chapter IX. 181 Book II. Religion And Mythology Of The Dorians. 202 Chapter I. 202 Chapter II. 216 Chapter III. 244 Chapter IV. 261 Chapter V. 270 Chapter VI. 278 Chapter VII. 292 Chapter VIII. 302 Chapter IX.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chronology of Ancient Kingdoms Amended
    THE CHRONOLOGY OF ANCIENT KINGDOMS AMENDED. To which is Prefix'd, A SHORT CHRONICLE from the First Memory of Things in Europe, to the Conquest of Persia by Alexander the Great. By Sir ISAAC NEWTON. LONDON: Printed for J. TONSON in the Strand, and J. OSBORN and T. LONGMAN in Pater-noster Row. MDCCXXVIII. TO THE QUEEN. MADAM, As I could never hope to write any thing my self, worthy to be laid before YOUR MAJESTY; I think it a very great happiness, that it should be my lot to usher into the world, under Your Sacred Name, the last work of as great a Genius as any Age ever produced: an Offering of such value in its self, as to be in no danger of suffering from the meanness of the hand that presents it. The impartial and universal encouragement which YOUR MAJESTY has always given to Arts and Sciences, entitles You to the best returns the learned world is able to make: And the many extraordinary Honours YOUR MAJESTY vouchsafed the Author of the following sheets, give You a just right to his Productions. These, above the rest, lay the most particular claim to Your Royal Protection; For the Chronology had never appeared in its present Form without YOUR MAJESTY's Influence; and the Short Chronicle, which precedes it, is entirely owing to the Commands with which You were pleased to honour him, out of your singular Care for the education of the Royal Issue, and earnest desire to form their minds betimes, and lead them early into the knowledge of Truth.
    [Show full text]
  • 6.5 X 11 Threelines.P65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-19126-5 - Delphi and Olympia: The Spatial Politics of Panhellenism in the Archaic and Classical Periods Michael Scott Index More information Index As in the text, numbers in bold with bold parentheses, e.g., (121), are reference numbers for particular monumental dedications or structures within the sanctuary of Delphi. They are listed in the appendices (A–F). Page numbers in italics refer to illustrations. Acanthians ritual procession around the Altis 163, dedication (180),Delphi 61, 103–5 221 Achaian federation see also athletic-victory statues; temple of dedications, Olympia 194–5, 200 Hera, Olympia; temple of Zeus, Aegina Olympia; tropaia, Olympia dedication (105),Delphi 84–5 Amphictyony dedication, Olympia 162 activities during the Persian wars 81 rivalry with Athens 267 Apollo Sitalcas dedication (166),Delphi Aeschines of Athens 133, 170 100 Aesclepius 142, 237 composition of 35, 36, 82, 125 aire, Apollo sanctuary, Delphi 42 dedication (102) following Persian wars, Alcmaeonids, family of 49, 52, 77 Delphi 82 Alexander I of Macedon 87 disinterest in the Athena sanctuary, Delphi Alexander III of Macedon 111–14, 130 activity at Delphi 134–5, 237–8 interaction with Alexander III of Macedon activity at Isthmia and Nemea 244, 134 247–8 interaction with Roman Emperor Hadrian activity at Olympia 212 261 involvement with articulations of Greek involvement in first Sacred War 52–3 community 269 involvement in post-548 bc rebuild of Altis, Olympia 10, 14, 20, 27, 219–28, 229–33, Apollo sanctuary 56 238–9,
    [Show full text]