DOCSLIB.ORG

6.5 X 11 Threelines.P65

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-19126-5 - Delphi and Olympia: The Spatial Politics of Panhellenism in the Archaic and Classical Periods Michael Scott Index More information Index As in the text, numbers in bold with bold parentheses, e.g., (121), are reference numbers for particular monumental dedications or structures within the sanctuary of Delphi. They are listed in the appendices (A–F). Page numbers in italics refer to illustrations. Acanthians ritual procession around the Altis 163, dedication (180),Delphi 61, 103–5 221 Achaian federation see also athletic-victory statues; temple of dedications, Olympia 194–5, 200 Hera, Olympia; temple of Zeus, Aegina Olympia; tropaia, Olympia dedication (105),Delphi 84–5 Amphictyony dedication, Olympia 162 activities during the Persian wars 81 rivalry with Athens 267 Apollo Sitalcas dedication (166),Delphi Aeschines of Athens 133, 170 100 Aesclepius 142, 237 composition of 35, 36, 82, 125 aire, Apollo sanctuary, Delphi 42 dedication (102) following Persian wars, Alcmaeonids, family of 49, 52, 77 Delphi 82 Alexander I of Macedon 87 disinterest in the Athena sanctuary, Delphi Alexander III of Macedon 111–14, 130 activity at Delphi 134–5, 237–8 interaction with Alexander III of Macedon activity at Isthmia and Nemea 244, 134 247–8 interaction with Roman Emperor Hadrian activity at Olympia 212 261 involvement with articulations of Greek involvement in first Sacred War 52–3 community 269 involvement in post-548 bc rebuild of Altis, Olympia 10, 14, 20, 27, 219–28, 229–33, Apollo sanctuary 56 238–9, 240 involvement in fourth-century rebuild of development and dedications 650–479 bc Apollo sanctuary 120–1 149, 150–1, 153–4, 156, 159–60, 162, public inscription of responsibilities, Delphi 176, 178–80 120–1, 129 black ash layer 148, 148–9 rearrangement by Philip II of Macedon memorialising conflict in 170–2 125 treasuries 164, 163–9, 191, 192, 207, 225: role in management of Delphi sanctuary comparison with Delphic treasuries 35–6, 37, 39, 125, 126, 144, 219–21, 163–9, 225 237–8 wells 150, 151, 154, 171 role in management of Demeter Anthela development and dedications 479–300 bc sanctuary 37, 40, 126 166, 181, 182, 190, 187–91, 206, use of Phocian fine 126 207–8 see also Delphi, polis of; Sacred War construction of temenos walls 189, Amphissa 132–3 208–9 Aphrodite 142, 194 dedication of statue groups 193–5 Apollo multiple role of athletic statues in cult 5, 61, 68, 81–4, 134, 137 198–201 in myth 56–9 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-19126-5 - Delphi and Olympia: The Spatial Politics of Panhellenism in the Archaic and Classical Periods Michael Scott Index More information Index 349 Apollo (cont.) Athena sanctuary, Delphi 19, 26, 219–28, in sculpture at Delphi 66, 71, 83–4, 89, 92, 229–33, 237 95, 96, 103, 107, 127, 129, 138, 139 development and dedications 650–500 bc in sculpture at Olympia 168 41, 42, 58 sanctuaryofApolloPtoion 70 redevelopment post-548 bc 66–8 see also temple of Apollo, Delphi development and dedications 500–400 bc Apollo sanctuary, Delphi 19, 25, 28, 219–28, 95, 95 229–40 development and dedications 400–300 bc development and dedications 650–500 bc 113, 111–14, 116, 130, 131, 129–31, 41, 43, 45, 57, 72–4 237–8 Eastern dedicators 45–7, 69 see also Apollo sanctuary, Delphi; temple of peribolos walls 37–8, 41, 46, 50, 59, 60–2 Athena, Delphi redevelopment post-548 bc 58, 56–9, Athens 77 61–2, 70–1 acanthus column (262),Delphi 135 development and dedications 500–400 bc attempts to act as ‘hearth’ of Greece 267 76, 102, 104, 108, 109 captured shields (98),Delphi 77 absence of mainland dedicators 91 commemoration of the battle of Marathon burial of dedications 108, 111, 225, 226 80–1, 96 dedications during the Persian wars 83, dedications, Olympia 158, 169, 170, 171, 81–8 172–5 importance of the temple terrace 75, 82, domination of Apollo sanctuary, Delphi 82, 86, 93 96–7, 136, 234 development and dedications 400–300 bc Doric treasury (120),Athenasanctuary, 112, 118–20, 123–4, 128, 140, 142–5, Delphi 95 237–8 eponymous heroes dedication (142),Delphi burial of dedications 120 97, 105, 107 construction fever 127–9 first treasury (7),Delphi 49 updating dedications 121–3 interaction with Delphic oracle 237 see also aire, Apollo sanctuary, Delphi; involvement in second Sacred War 100, Athena sanctuary, Delphi; 234 athletic-victory statues; cult of Ge and involvement in third Sacred War 124 the Muses, Delphi; stadium; temple of involvement in fourth Sacred War 132–3 Apollo, Delphi; temple of Athena, palm tree ‘Eurymedon’ dedication (136), Delphi Delphi 96–7, 232 Apollonia return to dedicating at Delphi in fourth dedication (64),Delphi 71 century 135–8 dedication, Olympia 195 second ‘Marathon’ treasury after 490 bc Arcadia (96),Delphi 79, 77–81 confederacy dedication (228),Delphi 116, spatial confrontation against Athens at 117 Delphi 104, 106, 103–8, 116 involvement with Olympia 146, 205 statue-group ‘Marathon’ dedication (97), Archon of Pella 134 Delphi 81 Argos 205 stoa (133),Delphi 95–6 control of Nemean games 245, 247 victory inscription (82),Delphi 77 dedications (167, 168, 178, 182, 227),Delphi athletic-victory statues 101–3, 115–17 at Delphi 111, 125, 132 dedications, Olympia 158, 169 at Olympia 160 interest in Isthmia 243 differentiation of style 161 Artemis 49, 67, 95, 113, 114, 139, 142 early statues 153 Athena 68, 95, 96–7, 101, 113, 131, 137, 139, list of Olympian victors 210 171, 172 mimicked in sculpture of Zeus temple see also Athena sanctuary, Delphi; temple of 185 Athena, Delphi origins of dedicators 162 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-19126-5 - Delphi and Olympia: The Spatial Politics of Panhellenism in the Archaic and Classical Periods Michael Scott Index More information 350 Index athletic-victory statues (cont.) crown games (periodos)sanctuaries 111, at Olympia (cont.) 240–8 placement around the Altis 159–60, competition between 160 189–90, 197–8, 213 involvement in articulations of Greek popularity of 178, 197–201, 203 community 265–72, 273 role(s) in Olympian space 198–201, similarities and differences 247–8, 214–17, 227 257–60 spatial association 162, 199–200, 209–10, see also Hellenic League 213 cult of Ge and the Muses, Delphi 46, 47, 48, see also dedications; Delphi, sanctuary of, 56–9, 121 games; Olympia, games; stadium Cumae, battle of 191, 192 commemoration at Delphi 191–2 Boeotia 72, 107 commemoration at Olympia 191–2 dedications (206, 209),Delphi 108 Cynisca of Sparta 204 treasury (43),Delphi 60–1 Cypselus of Corinth Bouleuterion at Delphi 42–5 at Delphi (13) 48, 221 at Olympia 44, 152 at Olympia 158, 159–60, 187, 190, 221 Cyrene Byzantium 167 statue of Ammon (299),Delphi 127 treasury (260),Delphi 127–9 centauromachy 185 treasury, Olympia 165, 167 ‘Chapel of Ge’ (10),Delphi 48 Chios Damaretus of Heraia 161, 162, 177 altar dedication (72),Delphi 71 Daochus of Thessaly 133–4 Cimon of Argos 199 dedications 2, 10, 34, 224–6 Cirrha, polis of 41, 51, 52 choices in style of 2, 24, 28, 38, 45–6, 47–8, Cleisthenes of Sicyon 54 49, 50–5, 60, 62–4, 70–1, 72–3, 75–7, Cleitorians 173, 174, 177 78, 82, 87, 91–7, 99, 109–10, 111–14, Cleosthenes of Epidamnus 161, 162, 173, 177 115, 138, 139–40, 143, 144–5, 160, 161, Cnidus 163–9, 171–5, 176, 192–6, 198–201, lesche (139),Delphi 94, 119, 127, 230, 210–12, 214–17, 224–7, 243, 252–3, 232 265–72 trapezoidal statue group (140),Delphi epiphanestaton topon 30, 63, 115 95 experience of 24, 28, 28, 36–7, 143, 144–5, treasury (33),Delphi 47–8 171, 172–5, 178, 200–1, 215, 220, 222, Corcyra 221–4, 226–7, 229–33, 236, 255–60, at Delphi 49–50, 123, 194 265–72 at Olympia 162, 175, 176 fate of 41, 44–5, 117–18, 120, 124, 126, 129, Corinth 130–1, 135, 143, 148–9, 155, 168, celebration of Corinthian defeat at Olympia 170–2, 193, 207, 226–7, 232, 243 168 inscriptions on 44, 72, 77, 81, 86, 90, 92, 93, control over Isthmia 242, 243 115, 117, 121–2, 123, 127, 129, 143, statue of Zeus, Olympia 173 167, 170, 173 treasury (2),Delphi 41–5, 52 meaning of 21–2, 41, 44–5, 73–4, 123–4, tropaia, Olympia 152 130–1, 142–3, 168, 169–70, 171, 172–5, see also Cypselus of Corinth; Periander of 177–8, 198–201, 231, 253–4, 265–72 Corinth placement of 29–37, 40, 48–51, 60–2, 75–7, Craterus, son of 134 78–9, 109, 120, 132, 139–40, 141, Croesus of Lydia 155–7, 158, 159–60, 171, 172–5, at Delphi 46, 100, 124 189–90, 193, 197–8, 209–10, 223–4, Cronus, hill of (Olympia) 146, 148, 150, 153, 243 157, 163, 188 previous scholarship on 7, 8, 10–11, 15, Croton 69, 89, 162, 176 16–17, 18–21, 24, 28 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-19126-5 - Delphi and Olympia: The Spatial Politics of Panhellenism in the Archaic and Classical Periods Michael Scott Index More information Index 351 dedications (cont.) de Polignac, Franc¸ois 16 reasons for 2, 7, 16–17, 24, 46, 49, 50–5, 72, Diagoras, family of 199 75, 77, 84–5, 97–101, 108, 117, 139–40, Didyma 258 144–5, 162, 167–8, 204–5, 232, 252–3, Diodorus 31 265–72 Dionysus see also athletic-victory statues; individual in cult 59, 140–2, 145, 237 dedications by name; space; tropaia, in sculpture 119, 138, 194 Olympia Dodona, sanctuary of 237 Delos 47, 51, 77, 107, 134, 257, 258–9 Delphi, polis of Echo stoa, Olympia 149, 150, 207 activity in the Athena sanctuary 114, 131, Eleusis 237, 258, 261, 273 130–1, 237–8 Elis, polis of 31–5 dedication, Olympia 162 athletic-victory statues, Olympia 209 political and religious activity
Recommended publications
  • The Date of the First Pythiad-Again Alden A

    The Date of the First Pythiad-Again Alden A

    MOSSHAMMER, ALDEN A., The Date of the First Pythiad - Again , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 23:1 (1982:Spring) p.15 The Date of the First Pythiad-Again Alden A. Mosshammer OST HISTORIANS have long agreed that the first in the regular M series of Pythian festivals celebrated every four years at Del­ phi took place in 58211. Now H. C. Bennett and more re­ cently S. G. Miller have argued that we should instead follow Pausa­ nias in dating the first Pythiad to 586/5, because the Pindaric scho­ liasts, they maintain, reckon Pythiads from that year. 1 The debate is an old one, but it has important implications for our understanding of the sequence of events at the time of the First Sacred War. Bennett and Miller have rightly criticized the excessive claims that have been made for some of the evidence; and Miller, in particular, has offered some important new insights into the problem. The argument in favor of 58211 nevertheless remains the stronger case. It needs to be presented once again, both to take these new objections into account and to elucidate the tradition that has given rise to the debate. I. The Problem According to the Parian Marble, our earliest evidence (264/3), the Amphictyons celebrated a victory against Cirrha by dedicating a por­ tion of the spoils as prizes for a chrematitic festival celebrated in 59110, and again the games became stephani tic in 582/1. 2 Pausanias 1 H. C. BENNETT, "On the Systemization of Scholia Dates for Pindar's Pythian Odes," HSCP 62 (1957) 61-78; STEPHEN G.
  • Oracle of Apollo Near Oroviai (Northern Evia Island, Greece) Viewed in Its Geοlogical and Geomorphological Context, Βull

    Oracle of Apollo Near Oroviai (Northern Evia Island, Greece) Viewed in Its Geοlogical and Geomorphological Context, Βull

    Mariolakos, E., Nicolopoulos, E., Bantekas, I., Palyvos, N., 2010, Oracles on faults: a probable location of a “lost” oracle of Apollo near Oroviai (Northern Evia Island, Greece) viewed in its geοlogical and geomorphological context, Βull. Geol. Soc. of Greece, XLIII (2), 829-844. Δελτίο της Ελληνικής Γεωλογικής Εταιρίας, 2010 Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece, 2010 Πρακτικά 12ου Διεθνούς Συνεδρίου, Πάτρα, Μάιος 2010 Proceedings of the 12th International Congress, Patras, May, 2010 ORACLES ON FAULTS: A PROBABLE LOCATION OF A “LOST” ORACLE OF APOLLO NEAR OROVIAI (NORTHERN EUBOEA ISLAND, GREECE) VIEWED IN ITS GEOLOGICAL AND GEOMORPHOLOGICAL CONTEXT I. Mariolakos1, V. Nikolopoulos2, I. Bantekas1, N. Palyvos3 1 University of Athens, Faculty of Geology, Dynamic, Tectonic and Applied Geology Department, Panepistimioupolis Zografou, 157 84, Athens, Greece, [email protected], [email protected] 2 Ministry of Culture, 2nd Ephorate of Prehistoric and Classical Antiquities, L. Syggrou 98-100, 117 41 Athens, Greece, [email protected] 3 Harokopio university, Department of Geography, El. Venizelou 70 (part-time) / Freelance Geologist, Navarinou 21, 152 32 Halandri, Athens, Greece, [email protected] Abstract At a newly discovered archaeological site at Aghios Taxiarches in Northern Euboea, two vo- tive inscribed stelae were found in 2001 together with hellenistic pottery next to ancient wall ruins on a steep and high rocky slope. Based on the inscriptions and the geographical location of the site we propose the hypothesis that this is quite probably the spot where the oracle of “Apollo Seli- nountios” (mentioned by Strabo) would stand in antiquity. The wall ruins of the site are found on a very steep bedrock escarpment of an active fault zone, next to a hanging valley, a high waterfall and a cave.
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography

    The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography

    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
  • Theopompus's Philippica

    Theopompus's Philippica

    chapter five Theopompus’s Philippica heopompus of Chios (FGrHist 115) was widely renowned in antiq- T uity for the severity with which he condemned the moral faults of the characters peopling his Philippica. Few indeed escaped the scathing vigor of his pen. Despite his family’s exile from Chios, Theopompus seems to have had the necessary funds to carry out thorough research (TT 20 and 28,FF25, 26 and 181) and did not have to work for a living, but was able to devote himself wholly to his writing.1 Because he was in no need of either patronage or an income, he had the freedom to write whatever he pleased without risk of losing his livelihood by causing offense. It is per- haps for this reason that he was known in antiquity as “a lover of the truth” (φιλαληθης )(T28). We must now determine whether or not this epithet was justified in Theopompus’s use of the past in the Philippica. In addition to his numerous epideictic speeches, Theopompus wrote three known historical works: an epitome of Herodotus, a Hellenica, and a Philippica.2 It is likely the epitome of Herodotus was Theopompus’s earliest 1. A recent discussion of the (very vague and contradictory) evidence for Theopompus’s life can be found in Michael Attyah Flower, Theopompus of Chios: History and Rhetoric in the Fourth Century BC (Oxford: Clarendon, 1994), 11–25. 2. Suda, s.v. Θε π µπ ς ι ς ρ ητωρ (ϭ T 1). 143 144 lessons from the past historical work,3 but all that remains of it is an entry in the Suda stating it contained two books (T 1) and four attributed fragments from ancient lexica giving it as the authority for the use of specific words (FF 1–4), although the possibility exists that some other, unattributed fragments may belong to it also.
  • 1 March 2011 CURRICULUM VITAE Elizabeth R. Gebhard Degrees B.A

    1 March 2011 CURRICULUM VITAE Elizabeth R. Gebhard Degrees B.A

    1 March 2011 CURRICULUM VITAE Elizabeth R. Gebhard Degrees B.A. Wellesley College, 1957 (Honors) M.A. University of Chicago, Department of the History of Art, 1959 Ph.D. University of Chicago, Department of Classical Languages and Literatures, 1963 Doc.Lett. (Hon) Wilson College, 1999 Membership in Learned Societies Corresponding Member, German Archaeological Institute Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries of London Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries (Scot.) University Appointments Edinburgh University, Department of Classics, Honorary Fellow, 2002-present University of Chicago, Department of Classical Languages and Literatures, Research Associate (Professor), 1980-present University of Illinois at Chicago, Classics Department, Ass't Professor -Professor, 1969-1996 (Emerita) Roosevelt University, Language Department, Visiting Assistant Professor, 1963-67 Administrative Positions University of Illinois at Chicago, Classics Department Chair, 1977-79; University Archaeological Studies Committee, Founder and Chair, 1975-80. University of Chicago Excavations at Isthmia Director, 1976-present 2 Visiting Appointments University of Chicago, Department of Classics, Winter 1982, Spring 1986-91, 1993-1999. Wellesley College, Department of Art History, Spring 1985 American School of Classical Studies at Athens, Senior Research Fellow (Annual Professor), 1983-84. Research Grants and Fellowships German Archaeological Institute, Berlin, Research Fellow, February-March, October, 2000 NEH, Archaeology of Cult and Settlement at Isthmia (Greece), 1993-1996, $209,612; Principal Investigator NEH, Excavations in the Sanctuary of Poseidon on the Isthmus of Corinth, 1989-1992, $410,000; Principal Investigator. NEH, Category B Fellowship, $20,000, 1981 NEH, Research Division, Isthmia Materials Analysis Project, 1978-1980, $65,000; Principal Investigator NEH, Education Division, Pilot Program for Archaeological Studies, 1980, $50,000; Principal Investigator E.L.
  • Download The

    Download The

    THE CONCEPT OF SACRED WAR IN ANCIENT GREECE By FRANCES ANNE SKOCZYLAS B.A., McGill University, 1985 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Classics) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA August 1987 ® Frances Anne Skoczylas, 1987 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of CLASSICS The University of British Columbia 1956 Main Mall Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Y3 Date AUtt-UST 5r 1Q87 ii ABSTRACT This thesis will trace the origin and development of the term "Sacred War" in the corpus of extant Greek literature. This term has been commonly applied by modern scholars to four wars which took place in ancient Greece between- the sixth and fourth centuries B. C. The modern use of "the attribute "Sacred War" to refer to these four wars in particular raises two questions. First, did the ancient historians give all four of these wars the title "Sacred War?" And second, what justified the use of this title only for certain conflicts? In order to resolve the first of these questions, it is necessary to examine in what terms the ancient historians referred to these wars.
  • Copyright by Amy Beth Angell 2017

    Copyright by Amy Beth Angell 2017

    Copyright by Amy Beth Angell 2017 The Thesis committee for Amy Beth Angell Certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: Images of Divinities in Functional Objects: A Study of Seventh-Century BCE Perirrhanteria in Greek Sanctuary Contexts APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: __________________________________________ Athanasio (Nassos) Papalexandrou, Supervisor _________________________________________ Penelope Davies Images of Divinities in Functional Objects: A Study of Seventh-Century BCE Perirrhanteria in Greek Sanctuary Contexts by Amy Beth Angell, B.A. Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts The University of Texas at Austin May 2017 Abstract Images of Divinities in Functional Objects: A Study of Seventh-Century BCE Perirrhanteria in Greek Sanctuary Contexts Amy Beth Angell, M.A. The University of Texas at Austin, 2017 Supervisor: Athanasio (Nassos) Papalexandrou Perirrhanteria in Greek sanctuaries are described in general terms as water basins for the purpose of purification. From the mid-seventh century to the early sixth century BCE, the perirrhanteria were made of marble, featured sculptural figures in the place of columnar stands, and found wide distribution among a variety of Greek sanctuaries. Due to the striking motif of the figurative stands, three or four female figures flanked by lions or standing on their backs, scholarship regarding the stone perirrhanteria has been centered on iconography and early monumental sculpture. Although preceding sculptural analyses provide useful information for the history of a motif, the relatively short lifespan of this particular basin type and its appearance in sanctuaries dedicated to an array of deities begs further study of its function in context.
  • University of Groningen Hellenistic Rural Settlement and the City of Thurii, the Survey Evidence (Sibaritide, Southern Italy) A

    University of Groningen Hellenistic Rural Settlement and the City of Thurii, the Survey Evidence (Sibaritide, Southern Italy) A

    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Groningen University of Groningen Hellenistic Rural Settlement and the City of Thurii, the survey evidence (Sibaritide, southern Italy) Attema, Peter; Oome, Neeltje Published in: Palaeohistoria DOI: 10.21827/5beab05419ccd IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2018 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Attema, P., & Oome, N. (2018). Hellenistic Rural Settlement and the City of Thurii, the survey evidence (Sibaritide, southern Italy). Palaeohistoria, 59/60, 135-166. https://doi.org/10.21827/5beab05419ccd Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 13-11-2019 PALAEOHISTORIA ACTA ET COMMUNICATIONES INSTITUTI ARCHAEOLOGICI UNIVERSITATIS GRONINGANAE 59/60 (2017/2018) University of Groningen / Groningen Institute of Archaeology & Barkhuis Groningen 2018 Editorial staff P.A.J.
  • The Ancient People of Italy Before the Rise of Rome, Italy Was a Patchwork

    The Ancient People of Italy Before the Rise of Rome, Italy Was a Patchwork

    The Ancient People of Italy Before the rise of Rome, Italy was a patchwork of different cultures. Eventually they were all subsumed into Roman culture, but the cultural uniformity of Roman Italy erased what had once been a vast array of different peoples, cultures, languages, and civilizations. All these cultures existed before the Roman conquest of the Italian Peninsula, and unfortunately we know little about any of them before they caught the attention of Greek and Roman historians. Aside from a few inscriptions, most of what we know about the native people of Italy comes from Greek and Roman sources. Still, this information, combined with archaeological and linguistic information, gives us some idea about the peoples that once populated the Italian Peninsula. Italy was not isolated from the outside world, and neighboring people had much impact on its population. There were several foreign invasions of Italy during the period leading up to the Roman conquest that had important effects on the people of Italy. First there was the invasion of Alexander I of Epirus in 334 BC, which was followed by that of Pyrrhus of Epirus in 280 BC. Hannibal of Carthage invaded Italy during the Second Punic War (218–203 BC) with the express purpose of convincing Rome’s allies to abandon her. After the war, Rome rearranged its relations with many of the native people of Italy, much influenced by which peoples had remained loyal and which had supported their Carthaginian enemies. The sides different peoples took in these wars had major impacts on their destinies. In 91 BC, many of the peoples of Italy rebelled against Rome in the Social War.
  • Pausanias' Description of Greece

    Pausanias' Description of Greece

    BONN'S CLASSICAL LIBRARY. PAUSANIAS' DESCRIPTION OF GREECE. PAUSANIAS' TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH \VITTI NOTES AXD IXDEX BY ARTHUR RICHARD SHILLETO, M.A., Soiiii'tinie Scholar of Trinity L'olltge, Cambridge. VOLUME IT. " ni <le Fnusnnias cst un homme (jui ne mnnquo ni de bon sens inoins a st-s tlioux." hnniie t'oi. inais i}iii rn>it ou au voudrait croire ( 'HAMTAiiNT. : ftEOROE BELL AND SONS. YOUK STIIKKT. COVKNT (iAKDKX. 188t). CHISWICK PRESS \ C. WHITTINGHAM AND CO., TOOKS COURT, CHANCEKV LANE. fA LC >. iV \Q V.2- CONTEXTS. PAGE Book VII. ACHAIA 1 VIII. ARCADIA .61 IX. BtEOTIA 151 -'19 X. PHOCIS . ERRATA. " " " Volume I. Page 8, line 37, for Atte read Attes." As vii. 17. 2<i. (Catullus' Aft is.) ' " Page 150, line '22, for Auxesias" read Anxesia." A.-> ii. 32. " " Page 165, lines 12, 17, 24, for Philhammon read " Philanimon.'' " " '' Page 191, line 4, for Tamagra read Tanagra." " " Pa ire 215, linu 35, for Ye now enter" read Enter ye now." ' " li I'aijf -J27, line 5, for the Little Iliad read The Little Iliad.'- " " " Page ^S9, line 18, for the Babylonians read Babylon.'' " 7 ' Volume II. Page 61, last line, for earth' read Earth." " Page 1)5, line 9, tor "Can-lira'" read Camirus." ' ; " " v 1'age 1 69, line 1 , for and read for. line 2, for "other kinds of flutes "read "other thites.'' ;< " " Page 201, line 9. for Lacenian read Laeonian." " " " line 10, for Chilon read Cliilo." As iii. 1H. Pago 264, " " ' Page 2G8, Note, for I iad read Iliad." PAUSANIAS. BOOK VII. ACIIAIA.
  • Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period Ryan

    Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period Ryan

    Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period by Ryan Anthony Boehm A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Emily Mackil, Chair Professor Erich Gruen Professor Mark Griffith Spring 2011 Copyright © Ryan Anthony Boehm, 2011 ABSTRACT SYNOIKISM, URBANIZATION, AND EMPIRE IN THE EARLY HELLENISTIC PERIOD by Ryan Anthony Boehm Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology University of California, Berkeley Professor Emily Mackil, Chair This dissertation, entitled “Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period,” seeks to present a new approach to understanding the dynamic interaction between imperial powers and cities following the Macedonian conquest of Greece and Asia Minor. Rather than constructing a political narrative of the period, I focus on the role of reshaping urban centers and regional landscapes in the creation of empire in Greece and western Asia Minor. This period was marked by the rapid creation of new cities, major settlement and demographic shifts, and the reorganization, consolidation, or destruction of existing settlements and the urbanization of previously under- exploited regions. I analyze the complexities of this phenomenon across four frameworks: shifting settlement patterns, the regional and royal economy, civic religion, and the articulation of a new order in architectural and urban space. The introduction poses the central problem of the interrelationship between urbanization and imperial control and sets out the methodology of my dissertation. After briefly reviewing and critiquing previous approaches to this topic, which have focused mainly on creating catalogues, I point to the gains that can be made by shifting the focus to social and economic structures and asking more specific interpretive questions.
  • International Law in Antiquity David J

    International Law in Antiquity David J

    Cambridge University Press 0521791979 - International Law in Antiquity David J. Bederman Index More information Index Achaeans— see also treaties see also Greek city-States agricultural/mercantile interests, 159 leagues and federations, 168 Amyntas/Chalcidians (Chalcis), 161 Peloponnesian War, 161, 163 Athens/Argives, 70, 175, 182 relations— Athens/Chalcidians (Chalcis), 164 Athens, 163 Athens/Egesta, 164 Sparta, 163, 182 Athens/Thebes, 163–64, 181 Trojan War, 228, 245, 256, 257–58 Babylon, 141 Adcock, Frank, 35, 96, 160, 168, 212–13 defensive, 36, 161–63, 172, 176, 177, 180, adjudication, norms, 268–69, 271 214–15 Adkins, A. W. H., 216 Egypt/Hittites, 148–49 Adrastus, 258 Elea/Heraea, 70, 162, 174–75, 182 Aegina, 94, 228 epimachia, see epimachia Aeschines, 69, 131, 254 Greek city-States, 35, 37, 156, 159–65 Aetolians— leagues, see leagues and federations see also Greek city-States military, 36, 161–65 federations, 168 offensive, 36, 159, 161–64, 214–15 relations— Peloponnesian War, 35, 37, 156 Macedon, 36, 198 philia, 125, 159–61, 184, 190 Rome, 118, 190–91, 198, 199, 205 Rome/Carthage, 42, 72–73, 134, 160 Sparta, 181 sanctity, 7 Agamemnon, 57, 250 Sparta/Argives (Argos), 163, 182 Ago, Roberto, 38, 42 Sybaris/Serdaioi, 159, 179 Ahhiyawa, relations, Hittites, 90, 91 symmachia, see symmachia Akkadian Empire— ambassadors— conquest, 22, 23 see also envoys covenants, 65 authority, 102 Elam, 140 credentials, 99–102, 104, 105, 116 oaths, 62 diplomacy, see diplomacy statecraft, 3, 47 embassies, see diplomatic missions Akkadian language, 24, 25, 140, 143, 147 immunities, see diplomatic immunities Alexander of Pherae, 112 Israelite kingdoms, 96, 108 Alexander the Great, 21, 31, 41, 93, 153, 167, liberty restrained, 112 250 Mesopotamia, 100 aliens, see foreigners Near East, 96 alliances— punishment, 91 303 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521791979 - International Law in Antiquity David J.