Quick viewing(Text Mode)

Oral Pyogenic Granuloma: a Review

Oral Pyogenic Granuloma: a Review

167

Journal of Oral Science, Vol. 48, No. 4, 167-175, 2006 Review Oral pyogenic : a review

Hamid Jafarzadeh1), Majid Sanatkhani2) and Nooshin Mohtasham3)

1)Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mashad University of Medical Sciences, Mashad, Iran 2)Department of , Faculty of Dentistry, Mashad University of Medical Sciences, Mashad, Iran 3)Department of Oral Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Mashad University of Medical Sciences, Mashad, Iran

(Received 29 June and accepted 11 August 2006)

Abstract: is one of the inflammatory seen in the oral cavity. This Introduction term is a misnomer because the lesion is unrelated to Pyogenic granuloma (PG) is a kind of inflammatory infection and in reality arises in response to various . The term “inflammatory hyperplasia” is used stimuli such as low-grade local irritation, traumatic to describe a large range of nodular growths of the oral injury or hormonal factors. It predominantly occurs mucosa that histologically represent inflamed fibrous and in the second decade of life in young females, possibly granulation tissues (1,2). It includes fibrous inflammatory because of the vascular effects of female hormones. hyperplasia (clinical , , and pulp Clinically, oral pyogenic granuloma is a smooth or polyp), palatal papillary hyperplasia, giant cell granuloma, lobulated exophytic lesion manifesting as small, red epulis and PG (2). erythematous papules on a pedunculated or sometimes PG is a common tumor-like growth of the oral cavity sessile base, which is usually hemorrhagic. The surface or skin that is considered to be non-neoplastic in nature ranges from pink to red to purple, depending on the (3,4). Hullihen’s description (5) in 1844 was most likely age of the lesion. Although excisional surgery is the the first PG reported in English literature, but the term treatment of choice for it, some other treatment “pyogenic granuloma” or “granuloma pyogenicum” was protocols such as the use of Nd:YAG laser, flash lamp introduced by Hartzell (6) in 1904. Although it is a common pulsed dye laser, cryosurgery, intralesional injection of disease in the skin, it is extremely rare in the gastrointestinal ethanol or corticosteroid and sodium tetradecyl sulfate tract, except for the oral cavity (7) where it is often found sclerotherapy have been proposed. Because of the high on keratinized tissue (8). There are two kinds of PG namely frequency of pyogenic granuloma in the oral cavity, lobular capillary hemangioma (LCH type) and non-LCH especially during pregnancy, and necessity for proper type, which differ in their histological features (9). diagnosis and treatment, a complete review of published Because of the high incidence of oral PG, especially in information and investigations about this lesion, in pregnant women, and the critical need for its proper addition to knowledge about new approaches for its diagnosis, management and treatment, this review will treatment is presented. (J. Oral Sci. 48, 167-175, 2006) address the etiology, clinical and histopathologic features and its correlation with pregnancy. This paper will also Keywords: inflammatory hyperplasia; oral cavity; review the differential diagnosis as well as new treatment pregnancy; pyogenic granuloma. approaches for PG.

Etiology and Epidemiology Correspondence to Dr. Hamid Jafarzadeh, Mashad Dental School, While some investigators (10) regard PG as a benign P.O. Box: 91735-984, Vakilabad Blv, Mashad, Iran neoplasm, it is usually considered to be a reactive tumor- Tel: +98-511-8829501 Fax: +98-511-7626058 like lesion which arises in response to various stimuli E-mail: [email protected] such as a chronic low-grade local irritation (3,11), traumatic 168 injury, hormonal factors (12) or certain kinds of drugs (13). activity of the tumor cells but also on the rate of cell death. Although it was originally thought to be caused by pyogenic Nakamura (28) suggested that the low apoptotic rate in PG organisms, it is now believed to be unrelated to infection is closely related to its rapid growth and is regulated by (2,3). So the term “pyogenic granuloma” is a misnomer Bcl-2 family proteins. because the lesion does not contain pus and is not strictly Although PG may occur in all ages (29,30), it is speaking a granuloma (1,3,11,14). It should be emphasized predominant in the second decade of life in young adult that as infective organisms such as Bartonella henselaea females, possibly because of the vascular effects of female (peliosis hepatis), B. henselae and B. quintana (bacillary hormones (1,3,11). Studies done in Jordanian (29) and angiomatosis), and human herpes virus type 8 (Kaposi’s Singaporean (31) populations were in agreement with this sarcoma and angiolymphoid hyperplasia) have been finding. In contrast, a recent study reported that the average identified in other vascular tumors, some authors have patient age was 52 years with a peak incidence of postulated that infective agents may play a part in recurrent occurrence in the sixth decade of life (9). Some authors PG. However, there is no evidence confirming the presence believe that patients are mostly males under 18 years of of infectious organisms in larger groups of PGs (15). age, females in the age range 18 to 39, and older patients Approximately one third of the lesions occur after with an equal gender distribution (16). Epivatianos et al. trauma (16), so the history of trauma before development (9) reported predominance in women (1:1.5) and the of this lesion is not unusual, especially for extragingival presence of etiological factors in 16% of cases, whereas, PGs (3,17). Poor oral hygiene may be a precipitating non-LCH PG was associated more frequently (86%) with factor in many of these patients (1,3,11). Aguilo (18) etiological factors. reported the formation of PG as a result of an injury to a Oral PG, which in reality is the most common gingival primary tooth and Milano et al. (19) reported a case of PG tumor (32), shows a striking predilection for the gingiva associated with aberrant tooth development. accounting for 75% of all cases, where they are presumably Some factors such as inducible nitric oxide synthase (20), caused by calculus or foreign material within the gingival vascular endothelial growth factor (21), basic fibroblast crevice. The , tongue, and buccal mucosa are the next growth factor (22) or connective tissue growth factor (23) most common sites (1,3,11). Lesions are slightly more are known to be involved in angiogenesis and rapid growth common on the maxillary gingiva than the mandibular of PG. gingiva; anterior areas are more frequently affected than Additionally, some drugs such as cyclosporine have an posterior areas. Also, these lesions are much more common important role in the genesis of PG. Bachmeyer et al. (24) on the facial aspect of the gingiva than the lingual aspect; and Lee et al. (25) reported four cases of oral PG in chronic some extend between the teeth and involve both the facial graft-versus-host disease in patients who were under and lingual gingiva (3). According to Vilmann et al. (4), cyclosporine. Also, some iatrogenic stimulations in dental majority of PGs are found on the marginal gingiva with practice may cause PG. Fowler et al. (8) first reported a only 15% of the tumors on the alveolar part. case in which PG was found associated with guided tissue regeneration. The lesion arose after demineralized freeze Clinical Features dried bone allograft with an expanded polytetra- Clinically, PG is a smooth or lobulated exophytic lesion fluoroethylene membrane were utilized to repair osseous manifesting as small, red erythematous papules on a defects. Oral complications occur after bone marrow pedunculated or sometimes sessile base, which is usually transplantation (BMT) due to regimen-related toxicity of hemorrhagic and compressible (1,3,11) and may develop the preparative regimen, and others by infections. Although as dumb-bell-shaped masses (14). However, Epivatianos oral granulomatous lesions are not common after BMT, et al. (9) reported that the two types of PG were clinically Kanda et al. (26) presented a patient who developed PG different. They found that LCH PG occurred more of the tongue early after allogenic BMT done for multiple frequently (66%) as a sessile lesion, whereas non-LCH PG myeloma. mostly occurred as pedunculated (77%). In 1980, Davies et al. (27) found inclusion bodies in the The size varies in diameter from a few millimeters to fibroblasts suggestive of disordered protein metabolism. several centimeters (3,11). Rarely does PG exceed 2.5 cm They suggested that PG constitutes a lesion produced by in size and it usually reaches its full size within weeks or a primitive tissue organizer resulting from gene de- months, remaining indefinitely thereafter (14). Clinical repression in the papillary fibroblasts, perhaps the result development of the lesion is slow, asymptomatic and of a C-type virus infection. It should be noted that the painless (3, 11) but it may also grow rapidly (33). The growth rate of tumors depends not only on the proliferative surface is characteristically ulcerated and friable (2) which 169 may be covered by a yellow, fibrinous membrane (11) and Factor (bFGF) and Transforming Growth Factor beta1 its color ranges from pink to red to purple, depending on (TGF-β1) production in fibroblasts, leading to granulation the age of the lesion. Young PGs are highly vascular in tissue formation. Estrogen enhances Vascular Endothelial appearance (3) because they are composed predominantly Growth Factor (VEGF) production in macrophages, an of hyperplastic granulation tissue in which capillaries are effect that is antagonized by androgens and which may be prominent. Thus minor trauma to the lesion may cause related to the development of PG during pregnancy. These considerable bleeding, due to its pronounced vascularity regulatory effects of sex steroids may be manipulated as (3,11), whereas older lesions tend to become more therapeutic or prophylactic measures in PG (40). Ojanotko- collagenized and pink (3). Rarely, PG may cause significant Harri et al. (41) suggested that progesterone functions as bone loss, as reported by Goodman-Topper and Bimstein an immunosuppressant in the gingival tissues of pregnant (34). women, preventing a rapid acute inflammatory reaction against plaque, but allowing an increased chronic tissue Correlation with Pregnancy reaction, resulting clinically in an exaggerated appearance PG of the gingiva develops in up to 5% of of inflammation. Yuan et al. (42) proposed that PG (35), hence the terms “pregnancy tumor” and “granuloma expressed significantly more VEGF and bFGF than healthy gravidarum” are often used (3). The hormonal imbalance gingiva and periodontium. Also, angiostatin was expressed coincident with pregnancy heightens the organism’s significantly less in PG than in healthy gingiva and response to irritation (1), however, bacterial plaque and periodontally involved gingiva. gingival inflammation are necessary for subclinical It should be noted that the molecular mechanism for hormone alterations leading to (36). The regression of pregnancy PG after parturition remains development of this particular kind of gingivitis, typical unclear. It has been proposed that, in the absence of VEGF, in pregnancy, not different from that appearing in non- Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) causes blood vessels to regress. pregnant women, suggests the existence of a relationship Yuan and Lin (43) proposed that Tumor Necrosis Factor- between the gingival lesion and the hormonal condition α (TNF-α) upregulated the expression of Ang-2 in all observed in pregnancy. Sometimes pregnancy gingivitis endothelial cell types tested. The protein level of Ang-2 can show a tendency towards localized hyperplasia, which was highest in the in pregnancy, followed by is called pregnancy granuloma. Generally it appears in the those after parturition and normal gingiva. The amount of 2nd - 3rd month of pregnancy, with a tendency to bleed VEGF was high in the granulomas in pregnancy and and a possible interference with mastication (37). During almost undetectable after parturition. After parturition, the first months of pregnancy, the persistent influence of there are more apoptotic cells and less Ang-2 than in plaque induces catarrhal inflammation of the gingiva that pregnancy, so VEGF alone or in combination with Ang- serves as a base for development of hyperplastic gingivitis 2 could protect microvessels from apoptosis, while Ang- during the last months, modulated by the cumulating 2 alone had no effect. hormonal stimuli. In uncontrolled cases, PG may arise. This Characteristic oral manifestations of hormonal oral lesion is rarely observed in women with poor oral hygiene contraceptive intake are similar to oral changes associated in areas with local irritating factors such as improperly with pregnancy, such as the pronounced vascularity of fitting restorations or dental calculus. During pregnancy, the gingiva, hyperplastic gingivitis, and PG. How oral PG when treated by surgical excision may reappear due contraceptives influence vascular changes in the to incomplete excision or inadequate oral hygiene (38). periodontium is unclear; prostaglandin E2 may be The molecular mechanisms behind the development implicated as a possible mediator of the inflammatory and regression of PG during pregnancy have been process (44). On the other hand, Nichols et al. (45) indicated extensively studied. The profound endocrine upheaval of that despite the PG relationship to pregnancy and oral pregnancy is frequently associated with changes in the contraceptive pills, the periodontium lacks steroid hormone function and structure of the blood and lymph receptors which suggests that estrogen or progesterone are microvasculature of the skin and mucosa. (39) Recent not directly involved in formation of this lesion. studies have revealed that sex hormones manifest a variety of biological and immunological effects. Estrogen Histopathology accelerates wound healing by stimulating Nerve Growth Microscopic examination of PG shows a highly vascular Factor (NGF) production in macrophages, Granulocyte- proliferation that resembles granulation tissue (3). Macrophage-Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) Numerous small and large channels are formed which are production in keratinocytes and basic Fibroblast Growth engorged with red blood cells (1,3) and lined by banal flat 170 or plump endothelial cells that may be mitotically active capillary phase, the lobules become frankly vascular with (16). The blood vessels often show a clustered or medullary abundant intra-luminal red blood cells. One or more central pattern separated by less vascular fibrotic septa, leading vessels develop a large lumen with a thick muscular layer some authorities to consider PG as a polypoid form of resembling a vein. In the involutionary phase, there is a capillary hemangioma or nothing more than an inflamed tendency for intra- and perilobular fibrosis with increased lobular hemangioma; others prefer to use the term venular differentiation (32). granulation tissue-type hemangioma (14). Some There are two histological types of PG. The first type pathologists require these vessels, which are sometimes is characterized by proliferating blood vessels that are organized in lobular aggregates, for diagnosis (lobular organized in lobular aggregates although superficially the capillary hemangioma) (3,11,46). lesion frequently undergoes no specific change, including At low magnification, particularly at the lateral edges, edema, capillary dilation or inflammatory granulation a lobular arrangement is noted wherein groups of capillaries tissue reaction. This histological type of PG was called proliferate but abruptly stop. Each lobule is surrounded by lobular capillary hemangioma (LCH type) (10), whereas a thin collagen layer. This arrangement is disrupted at the the second type (non-LCH type) consists of highly vascular base, where irregularly shaped larger vascular channels proliferation that resembles granulation tissue (3, 14). reside and presumably communicate with the proliferation. The lobular area of the LCH PG contains a greater number It is here that some anastomosing channels (resembling of blood vessels with small luminal diameter than does the angiosarcoma) can occasionally be identified, but they central area of non-LCH PG. In the central area of non- are focal rather than an integral part of the lesion. At LCH PG, a significantly greater number of vessels with higher magnification, another discriminating feature of perivascular mesenchymal cells non-reactive for α-smooth benign vascular lesion is found: the small capillary muscle actin and muscle-specific actin is present than in endothelial-lined spaces are themselves surrounded by a the lobular area of LCH PG. These differences suggest that perithelial or pericytic layer of cells. This double layer of two histological types of PG represent distinct entities cells, also seen in intramuscular angiomatosis, is not seen (9). Toida et al. (49) found that the presence of blood in the clonal angiosarcoma (32). vessels with different luminal diameter in the lobular area Polymorphs, as well as chronic inflammatory cells, are of LCH PG and in the central area of non-LCH PG may consistently present throughout the edematous stroma, be because different pathogenic factors influence their with micro-abscess formation (2). The fibroblasts are development. Epivatianos et al. (9) observed that foci of typically plump and mitotic activity may be noted in the fibrous maturation were present in 15% of non-LCH PG stromal cells. Older lesions demonstrate fewer and more but were totally absent in LCH PG. Although it is possible mature cells, which are fibrocytes. Occasional lesions that PG can undergo fibrous maturation, they showed that demonstrate an extreme predominance of plasma cells, this happened only in non-LCH PG which suggests that prompting some pathologists to call them plasma cell the two types of PG have different pathways of evolution. granuloma, a term that is best avoided because of the potential confusion with mucosal solitary plasmacytoma Differential Diagnosis or multiple myeloma. Rare examples of intravenous PG When a mass is found in the oral cavity, it is important have been reported (47). to formulate a differential diagnosis since this would help Some scarring may be noted in some of these lesions, further evaluation of the condition and management of the suggesting that occasionally there may be maturation of patient (48). Biopsy findings have an important role and the connective tissue repair process (11). The surface of are definitive in establishing the diagnosis. (11) Differential the lesion may undergo secondary, nonspecific changes that diagnosis of PG includes peripheral giant cell granuloma, include stromal edema, capillary dilation, inflammation, peripheral ossifying fibroma, metastatic cancer (1,11), and granulation tissue reaction (48). The surface is usually hemangioma (1,11,16,47,50), pregnancy tumor (37), ulcerated and replaced by a thick fibrin purulent membrane conventional granulation tissue, hyperplastic gingival (3). A mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate of neutrophils is inflammation (47,50), Kaposi’s sarcoma, bacillary mostly prevalent near the ulcerated surface; chronic angiomatosis (16,47,50), angiosarcoma (16), and Non- inflammatory cells are found deeper in the specimen (3, Hodgkin’s (51). 11). Peripheral giant cell granuloma (PGCG) is an exophytic In brief, the natural history of the lesion follows three lesion that is seen exclusively in the gingiva (2) and is distinct phases. In the cellular phase, the lobules are clinically similar to PG (11), but PGCG is often more compact and cellular with little lumen formation. In the bluish-purple compared to the bright red of a typical PG 171

(3). Although PGCG is more likely to cause bone resorption the validity of the clinical term “pregnancy tumor”. On the than a PG, the differences are otherwise minimal. Generally, basis of its clinical presentation and histologic appearance, this lesion is clinically indistinguishable from a PG but the some authors believe that it simply represents a PG, features that set PGCG apart from other reactive whereas others believe that the lesion is unique because hyperplasias are the appearance of multinucleated giant of the apparent influence of female sex hormones (56). cells (11) and lack of infectious source (1). Increased prevalence of pregnancy epulis toward the end Depending on its duration, PG will vary in texture from of pregnancy and the tendency for this lesion to shrink after soft to firm, and can be suggestive of a fibroma (1,11) so delivery indicate a definitive role for hormones in the peripheral odontogenic or ossifying fibroma may be another etiology of the lesion. (2,57) According to Ojanotko-Harri consideration, although these tend to be much lighter in et al. (41), there is no clinical and histological difference color (11). Also, it is usually about 1.5 cm in diameter, between pregnancy tumor and PG that occurs in non- although some have reached 6 cm in diameter (52). Like pregnant patients but some authors believe that unlike PG, it is commonly encountered among pregnant women PG, pregnancy tumor is usually confined to the interdental but unlike PG, this lesion is found exclusively on the papilla (57). Daley et al. (56) indicated that diagnosis of gingiva (2), and has a minimal vascular component (11). pregnancy tumor is valid clinically in describing a PG Although metastatic tumors to the oral region are occurring in pregnancy, because it describes a distinct uncommon, the attached gingiva is the most common lesion not on the basis of histologic features but on etiology, affected soft tissue site followed by the tongue. In nearly biologic behavior, and treatment protocol. 30% of cases, the metastatic lesion in the oral region is Conventional granulation tissue is another differential the first indication of an undiscovered malignancy at a diagnosis that should be considered. Despite the close distant site (53) so the microscopic appearance should relationship between PG and conventional granulation resemble the tumor of origin (3). Hirshberg et al. (54) tissue, PG shows clinically different behavior, such as analyzing 157 cases, reported that most cases (64%) were rapid growth, multiple occurrence and frequent recurrence, diagnosed in patients in their fifth to seventh decade which from those in granulation tissue (47,50,58,59). is different from PG. The clinical appearance of the Hyperplastic gingival inflammation should also be metastatic oral lesion in most cases resembled hyperplastic considered. The histopathologic differentiation of PG or reactive lesions such as PG. from hyperplastic gingival inflammation is sometimes One important differential diagnosis of PG is impossible, and the pathologist must depend on the hemangioma which is a developmental disorder (1,2), but surgeon’s description of a distinct clinical mass to diagnose small lesions may be clinically indistinguishable from the granuloma (14). Kaposi’s sarcoma of Acquired PG. Diascopy, the technique of applying pressure to a Immuno-Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) shows proliferation suspected vascular lesion to visualize the evacuation of of dysplastic spindle cells, vascular clefts, extravasated coloration, supports the fact that patent blood-filled spaces erythrocytes and intracellular hyaline globules, none of constitute the lesion. Most oral hemangiomas are located which are features of PG (14). The initial diagnosis of on the tongue, where they are multinodular and bluish red Kaposi’s sarcoma requires microscopic evaluation of (2). In comparison with PG, hemangioma has more plump, biopsy material because this disease can mimic a number histiocytoid, endothelial cell proliferation without an acute of intraoral lesions such as PG, bacillary angiomatosis, inflammatory cell infiltrate (47,50). Freitas et al. (55) hemangioma, and lymphoma (60). evaluated the immuno-histochemical expression of VEGF- Bacillary angiomatosis, also AIDS-related, shows dense, C1 and showed that there was no statistically significant extracellular deposits of pale hematoxyphilic granular difference in the angiogenesis index between PG and material representing masses of bacilli that stain positive hemangioma. There was no statistically significant with Warthin-Ostarry stain (14). difference between the lesions in the number of cells PG can be distinguishable from angiosarcoma by its highlighted by staining for VEGF-C1. The VEGF-positive lobular growth pattern, well-formed vessels, and cells in PG were macrophages and fibroblasts. These cytologically bland endothelial cells (16). Another results affirm the role of angiogenic factors in the consideration is Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) of etiopathogenesis of hemangioma and PG, however, it which primary sites in the head and neck are Waldeyer’s showed that microvessel quantification is not useful in the ring, paranasal sinuses, salivary glands, the oral cavity, and differential diagnosis of these lesions. the larynx. Clinical appearance of gingival NHL varies but Another differential diagnosis is pregnancy tumor is usually found to be an asymptomatic gingival (pregnancy epulis) (37). There is some disagreement about enlargement or mass resembling a PG (51). 172

Treatment by both the specific and the nonspecific actions of STS, Although many treatment techniques have been described which specifically causes endothelial cell damage and for PG, when it is large or occurs in a surgically difficult obliterates vessel lumina. Moreover, infiltrations of STS area, choosing an appropriate treatment modality can be into stromal tissues can cause nonspecific necrotic changes. difficult (35). Excisional biopsy is indicated for treatment Also, Parisi et al. (33) used a series of intralesional of PG, except when the procedure would produce marked corticosteroid injections for treatment of PG, particularly deformity; in such a case, incisional biopsy is mandatory for highly recurrent lesions. (2). So, management of PG depends on the severity of Treatment considerations during pregnancy are very symptoms. If the lesion is small, painless and free of important. During this period, careful oral hygiene, removal bleeding, clinical observation and follow up are advised of dental plaque, and use of soft toothbrushes are important (35). Although conservative surgical excision and removal to avoid occurrence of a pregnancy tumor. If uncontrolled of causative irritants (plaque, calculus, foreign materials, bleeding occurs, management should be based on the source of trauma) are the usual treatments (1,3,11,61) for individual condition and should range from supportive gingival lesions, the excision should extend down to the therapy such as desiccation of bleeders; local, firm periosteum and the adjacent teeth should be thoroughly compression and oral hygiene to blood transfusion, as scaled to remove the source of continuing irritation (3). well as medication to accelerate fetal lung maturity or even Recently, some other treatment protocols, instead of termination of pregnancy to save the patient's life, as with excisional surgery, have been proposed. Powell et al. (62) treatment of uncontrollable eclampsia (68). Steelman and reported the use of Nd:YAG laser for excision of this Holmes (69) believed that maintenance of oral hygiene and lesion because of the lower risk of bleeding compared to regular follow up appointments should be recommended other surgical techniques. They chose the Nd:YAG laser while pregnant. Surgical and periodontal treatment should over the CO2 laser, because of its superior coagulation be completed, when possible, during the second trimester, characteristics. White et al. (63) proposed that laser excision with continued surveillance of home care until after delivery is well tolerated by patients with no adverse effects. They (2) but some authors believe that in the gravid patient, also stated that CO2 and Nd:YAG laser irradiation is recurrence is likely and treatment, to be successful, should successful in surgical treatment. await parturition (1). In pregnant women, lesional shrinkage Meffert et al. (64) used the flash lamp pulsed dye laser after the birth may make surgery unnecessary (14). on a mass of granulation tissue which did not respond to After excision, recurrence occurs in up to 16% of the the usual treatment methods and concluded that previously lesions (70) so in some cases re-excision is necessary resolute tissue responded well to a series of treatments with (1,3,11). Recurrence is believed to result from incomplete the pulsed dye laser. Ishida and Ramos-e-Silva (65) believed excision, failure to remove etiologic factors, or re-injury that cryosurgery is a very useful technique for treatment of the area (11). Some recurrences manifest as multiple of PG. They stated that , because of its humidity deep satellite nodules that surround the site of the original and smoothness is an ideal site for this technique. It shows lesion (Warner-Wilson Jones syndrome) (70). It should be a very good esthetic result and it may be either the first emphasized that gingival cases show a much higher choice or an alternative option to conventional surgery. recurrence rate than lesions from other oral mucosal sites Although conservative treatment by techniques such as (4). cryosurgery, laser surgery, and electrodessication are usually adequate, excisional treatment can often result in Conclusion scars, so Ichimiya et al. (66) attempted a different approach Although pyogenic granuloma is a non-neoplastic growth using an injection of absolute “ethanol” in patients with in the oral cavity, proper diagnosis, prevention, management recurrence due to inadequate cryosurgery and concluded and treatment of the lesion are very important. Pyogenic that this therapy was less invasive than surgical excision granuloma arises in response to various stimuli such as low- and appeared to be an alternative therapy for PG. grade local irritation, traumatic injury, sex hormones or Moon et al. (67) reported that sodium tetradecyl sulfate certain kinds of drugs, so removal of causative irritants (STS) sclerotherapy successfully cleared the lesions in most (plaque, calculus, foreign materials, and source of trauma) patients, without major complications. They believe that is the major line of treatment. Excisional surgery is the this technique offers a better alternative than excision treatment of choice for pyogenic granuloma, but some new because of its simplicity and lack of scarring, even though approaches for treatment such as cryosurgery, excision by multiple treatment sessions are required. The mechanism Nd:YAG laser, flash lamp pulsed dye laser, injection of of the therapeutic effects of their technique may be mediated ethanol or corticosteroid and sodium tetradecyl sulfate 173 sclerotherapy have been reported as alternative therapies. pyogenic granuloma as a complication of pregnancy In spite of these treatments, recurrence is not infrequent and the use of hormonal contraceptives. Int J so in some cases re-excision may be necessary. It should Gynaecol Obstet 14, 187-191 be emphasized that one important point about pyogenic 13. Miller RA, Ross JB, Martin J (1985) Multiple granuloma is the effect of sex hormonal imbalances during granulation tissue lesions occurring in isotretinoin pregnancy which is one of the most common causes of treatment of acne vulgaris – successful response to pyogenic granuloma. During pregnancy, careful oral topical corticosteroid therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol hygiene, removal of dental plaque, and use of soft 12, 888-889 toothbrushes are important to avoid occurrence of pyogenic 14. Bouquot JE, Nikai H (2001) Lesions of the oral granuloma. cavity. In Diagnostic surgical pathology of the head and neck, Gnepp DR ed, WB Saunders, Philadelphia, References 141-233 1. Eversole LR (2002) Clinical outline of oral 15. Janier M (1999) Infection and angiomatous pathology: diagnosis and treatment. 3rd ed, BC cutaneous lesions. J Mal Vasc 24, 135-138 (in Decker, Hamilton, 113-114 French) 2. Greenberg MS, Glick M (2003) Burket’s oral 16. Pilch BZ (2001) Head and neck surgical pathology. medicine: diagnosis and treatment. 10th ed, BC Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 389- Decker, Hamilton, 141-142 390 3. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot JE 17. Macleod RI, Soames JV (1987) Epulides: a (2002) Oral & maxillofacial pathology. 2nd ed, WB clinicopathological study of a series of 200 Saunders, Philadelphia, 437-495 consecutive lesions. Br Dent J 163, 51-53 4. Vilmann A, Vilmann P, Vilmann H (1986) Pyogenic 18. Aguilo L (2002) Pyogenic granuloma subsequent granuloma: evaluation of oral conditions. Br J Oral to injury of a primary tooth. A case report. Int J Maxillofac Surg 24, 376-382 Paediatr Dent 12, 438-441 5. Hullihen SP (1844) Case of aneurism by anastomosis 19. Milano M, Flaitz CM, Bennett J (2001) Pyogenic of the superior maxillae. Am J Dent Sc 4, 160-162 granuloma associated with aberrant tooth 6. Hartzell MB (1904) Granuloma pyogenicum. J development. Tex Dent J 118, 166-172 Cutan Dis Syph 22, 520-525 20. Shimizu K, Naito S, Urata Y, Sekine I, Kondo T, 7. Yao T, Nagai E, Utsunomiya T, Tsuneyoshi M Katayama I (1998) Inducible nitric oxide synthase (1995) An intestinal counterpart of pyogenic is expressed in granuloma pyogenicum. Br J granuloma of the skin. A newly proposed entity. Am Dermatol 138, 769-773 J Surg Pathol 19, 1054-1060 21. Bragado R, Bello E, Requena L, Renedo G, Texeiro 8. Fowler EB, Cuenin MF, Thompson SH, Kudryk E, Alvarez MV, Castilla MA, Caramelo C (1999) VL, Billman MA (1996) Pyogenic granuloma Increased expression of vascular endothelial growth associated with guided tissue regeneration: a case factor in pyogenic granulomas. Acta Derm Venereol report. J Periodontol 67, 1011-1015 79, 422-425 9. Epivatianos A, Antoniades D, Zaraboukas T, Zairi 22. Hagiwara K, Khaskhely NM, Uezato H, Nonaka S E, Poulopoulos A, Kiziridou A, Iordanidis S (2005) (1999) Mast cell “densities” in vascular Pyogenic granuloma of the oral cavity: comparative proliferations: a preliminary study of pyogenic study of its clinicopathological and granuloma, portwine stain, cavernous hemangioma, immunohistochemical features. Pathol Int 55, 391- cherry angioma, Kaposi’s sarcoma, and malignant 397 hemangioendothelioma. J Dermatol 26, 577-586 10. Mills SE, Cooper PH, Fechner RE (1980) Lobular 23. Igarashi A, Hayashi N, Nashiro K, Takehara K capillary hemangioma: the underlying lesion of (1998) Differential expression of connective tissue pyogenic granuloma. A study of 73 cases from the growth factor gene in cutaneous fibrohistiocytic oral and nasal mucous membranes. Am J Surg and vascular tumors. J Cutan Pathol 25, 143-148 Pathol 4, 470-479 24. Bachmeyer C, Devergie A, Mansouri S, Dubertret 11. Regezi JA, Sciubba JJ, Jordan RCK (2003) Oral L, Aractingi S (1996) Pyogenic granuloma of the pathology: clinical pathologic considerations. 4th ed, tongue in chronic graft versus host disease. Ann WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 115-116 Dermatol Venereol 123, 552-554 (in French) 12. Mussalli NG, Hopps RM, Johnson NW (1976) Oral 25. Lee L, Miller PA, Maxymiw WG, Messner HA, 174

Rotstein LE (1994) Intraoral pyogenic granuloma 38. Boyarova TV, Dryankova MM, Bobeva AI, Genadiev after allogeneic bone marrow transplant. Report of GI (2001) Pregnancy and gingival hyperplasia. Folia three cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 78, 607- Med (Plovdiv) 43, 53-56 610 39. Henry F, Quatresooz P, Valverde-Lopez JC, Pierard 26. Kanda Y, Arai C, Chizuka A, Suguro M, Hamaki GE (2006) Blood vessel changes during pregnancy: T, Yamamoto R, Yamauchi Y, Matsuyama T, a review. Am J Clin Dermatol 7, 65-69 Takezako N, Shirai Y, Miwa A, Iwasaki K, Nasu M, 40. Kanda N, Watanabe S (2005) Regulatory roles of Togawa A (2000) Pyogenic granuloma of the tongue sex hormones in cutaneous biology and immunology. early after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation J Dermatol Sci 38, 1-7 for multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma 37, 445- 41. Ojanotko-Harri AO, Harri MP, Hurttia HM, Sewon 449 LA (1991) Altered tissue metabolism of progesterone 27. Davies MG, Barton SP, Atai F, Marks R (1980) in pregnancy gingivitis and granuloma. J Clin The abnormal dermis in pyogenic granuloma. Periodontol 18, 262-266 Histochemical and ultrastructural observations. J 42. Yuan K, Jin YT, Lin MT (2000) The detection and Am Acad Dermatol 2, 132-142 comparison of angiogenesis-associated factors in 28. Nakamura T (2000) Apoptosis and expression of pyogenic granuloma by immunohistochemistry. J Bax/Bcl-2 proteins in pyogenic granuloma: a Periodontol 71, 701-709 comparative study with granulation tissue and 43. Yuan K, Lin MT (2004) The roles of vascular capillary hemangioma. J Cutan Pathol 27, 400-405 endothelial growth factor and angiopoietin-2 in the 29. Al-Khateeb T, Ababneh K (2003) Oral pyogenic regression of pregnancy pyogenic granuloma. Oral granuloma in Jordanians: a retrospective analysis of Dis 10, 179-185 108 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61, 1285-1288 44. Brooks JK (1980) The effects of hormonal oral 30. Lawoyin JO, Arotiba JT, Dosumu OO (1997) Oral contraceptives on the female human periodontium pyogenic granuloma: a review of 38 cases from and experimental animal models, a review of the Ibadan, Nigeria. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35, 185- literature. J Baltimore Coll Dent Surg 33, 12-16 189 45. Nichols GE, Gaffey MJ, Mills SE, Weiss LM (1992) 31. Zain RB, Khoo SP, Yeo JF (1995) Oral pyogenic Lobular capillary hemangioma. An granuloma (excluding pregnancy tumor) – a clinical immunohistochemical study including steroid analysis of 304 cases. Singapore Dent J 20, 8-10 hormone receptor status. Am J Clin Pathol 97, 770- 32. Sternberg SS, Antonioli DA, Carter D, Mills SE, 775 Oberman H (1999) Diagnostic surgical pathology. 46. Fechner RE, Cooper PH, Mills SE (1981) Pyogenic 3rd ed, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, granuloma of the larynx and trachea. A causal and 69, 174 pathologic misnomer for granulation tissue. Arch 33. Parisi E, Glick PH, Glick M (2006) Recurrent Otolaryngol 107, 30-32 intraoral pyogenic granuloma with satellitosis treated 47. Enzinger FM, Weiss SW (1995) Soft tissue tumors. with corticosteroids. Oral Dis 12, 70-72 3rd ed, Mosby, St Louis, 600 34. Goodman-Topper ED, Bimstein E (1994) Pyogenic 48. Willies-Jacobo LJ, Isaacs H Jr, Stein MT (2000) granuloma as a cause of bone loss in a twelve-year- Pyogenic granuloma presenting as a congenital old child: report of case. ASDC J Dent Child 61, epulis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 154, 603-605 65-67 49. Toida M, Hasegawa T, Watanabe F, Kato K, Makita 35. Sills ES, Zegarelli DJ, Hoschander MM, Strider H, Fujitsuka H, Kato Y, Miyamoto K, Shibata T, WE (1996) Clinical diagnosis and management of Shimokawa K (2003) Lobular capillary hemangioma hormonally responsive oral pregnancy tumor of the oral mucosa: clinicopathological study of 43 (pyogenic granuloma). J Reprod Med 41, 467-470 cases with a special reference to immunohis- 36. Sooriyamoorthy M, Gower DB (1989) Hormonal tochemical characterization of the vascular elements. influences on gingival tissue: relationship to Pathol Int 53, 1-7 . J Clin Periodontol 16, 201-208 50. Calonje E, Wilson-Jones E (1997) Vascular tumors: 37. Tumini V, Di Placido G, D’Archivio D, Del Giglio tumors and tumor-like conditions of blood vessels Matarazzo A (1998) Hyperplastic gingival lesions and lymphatics. In Lever’s histopathology of the skin, in pregnancy. I. Epidemiology, pathology and clinical 8th ed, Elder D, Elenitsas R, Jaworsky C, Johnson aspects. Minerva Stomatol 47, 159-167 (in Italian) B Jr eds, Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, 895 175

51. Raut A, Huryn J, Pollack A, Zlotolow I (2000) 136-138, 140, 142 passim; quiz 148 Unusual gingival presentation of post-transplantation 61. Esmeili T, Lozada-Nur F, Epstein J (2005) Common lymphoproliferative disorder: a case report and benign oral soft tissue masses. Dent Clin North Am review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral 49, 223-240 Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 90, 436-441 62. Powell JL, Bailey CL, Coopland AT, Otis CN, Frank 52. Bodner L, Dayan D (1987) Growth potential of JL, Meyer I (1994) Nd:YAG laser excision of a giant peripheral ossifying fibroma. J Clin Periodontol gingival pyogenic granuloma of pregnancy. Lasers 14, 551-554 Surg Med 14, 178-183 53. Hirshberg A, Buchner A (1995) Metastatic tumors 63. White JM, Chaudhry SI, Kudler JJ, Sekandari N, to the oral region. An overview. Eur J Cancer B Oral Schoelch ML, Silverman S Jr (1998) Nd:YAG and Oncol 31, 355-360 CO2 laser therapy of oral mucosal lesions. J Clin 54. Hirshberg A, Leibovich P, Buchner A (1993) Laser Med Surg 16, 299-304 Metastases to the oral mucosa: analysis of 157 64. Meffert JJ, Cagna DR, Meffert RM (1998) Treatment cases. J Oral Pathol Med 22, 385-390 of oral granulation tissue with the flashlamp pulsed 55. Freitas TM, Miguel MC, Silveira EJ, Freitas RA, dye laser. Dermatol Surg 24, 845-848 Galvão HC (2005) Assessment of angiogenic 65. Ishida CE, Ramos-e-Silva M (1998) Cryosurgery in markers in oral hemangiomas and pyogenic oral lesions. Int J Dermatol 37, 283-285 granulomas. Exp Mol Pathol 79, 79-85 66. Ichimiya M, Yoshikawa Y, Hamamoto Y, Muto M 56. Daley TD, Nartey NO, Wysocki GP (1991) (2004) Successful treatment of pyogenic granuloma Pregnancy tumor: an analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med with injection of absolute ethanol. J Dermatol 31, Oral Pathol 72, 196-199 342-344 57. Sonis ST, Fazio RC, Fang LST (1995) Principles and 67. Moon SE, Hwang EJ, Cho KH (2005) Treatment of practice of oral medicine. 2nd ed, WB Saunders, pyogenic granuloma by sodium tetradecyl sulfate Philadelphia, 416 sclerotherapy. Arch Dermatol 141, 644-646 58. Kapadia SB, Heffner DK (1992) Pitfalls in the 68. Wang PH, Chao HT, Lee WL, Yuan CC, Ng HT histopathologic diagnosis of pyogenic granuloma. (1997) Severe bleeding from a pregnancy tumor. A Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 249, 195-200 case report. J Reprod Med 42, 359-362 59. Requena L, Sangueza OP (1997) Cutaneous vascular 69. Steelman R, Holmes D (1992) Pregnancy tumor in proliferation. Part II. Hyperplasias and benign a 16-year-old: case report and treatment neoplasms. J Am Acad Dermatol 37, 887-919 considerations. J Clin Pediatr Dent 16, 217-218 60. Flaitz CM, Nichols CM, Hicks MJ (1995) An 70. Taira JW, Hill TL, Everett MA (1992) Lobular overview of the oral manifestations of AIDS-related capillary hemangioma (pyogenic granuloma) with Kaposi’s sarcoma. Compend Contin Educ Dent 16, satellitosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 27, 297-300