Outline Business Case
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
South Gloucestershire Council
South Gloucestershire Patchway Town Centre Council Draft Profile Updated to June 2014 Policies, Sites & Places Plan Please send any further suggestions for Draft Town Centre Profiles change to [email protected] This is one of a series of draft town centre profiles which will be used to inform future planning policy. Initial comments were invited to arrive by 31st December 2013. Comments were made by: Patchway Town Council on behalf of the Patchway Town Centre Group which has representatives of several local interest groups. Patchway District Centre 1. Location The original shopping parade of M5 Junction 16 Rodway Road is located north of Highwood Road. A new local centre to serve Charlton Hayes is developing Coniston south of Highwood Road. Parade The intention is to consolidate both areas to become a Rodway Road recognisable town centre. Local Centre Patchway also has local centres at Coniston Road and along the A38. Highwood Road 2. Origin Patchway Roundabout The older area of Rodway local shops Road was developed as a suburban shopping parade in the 1930s. There was some A38 local further expansion in the 1950s shops Proposed Charlton and redevelopment of the Hayes Local Centre library in 2010 to form a new locality hub offering a range of services. The new local centre at Charlton Hayes is, at 2014, still Patchway – Existing and proposed local centres. under development to serve the new neighbourhood of over The aim is to combine the existing and proposed 2,000 dwellings. However there Rodway Road and Charlton Hayes local centres to is a real opportunity to fulfil the form a new town/district centre to serve the vision of Patchway Town established and new communities across Highwood Council for an integrated town Road. -
Adopted Text
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Amendment No. 2017-28 Adopted November 17, 2020 AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (2017 EDITION) The following changes to the Comprehensive Plan have adopted by the Board of Supervisors. To identify changes from the previously adopted Plan, new text is shown with underline and deleted text shown with strikethrough. MODIFY: Fairfax County Comprehensive Plan, 2017 Edition, Area III, Fairfax Center Area, as amended through 7-31-2018, Fairfax Center Area-Wide Recommendations, page 8, to delete strikethrough text: “The core area near the first Metrorail station is planned for a mix of uses at a variety of intensities, some of which are tied to the funding of the Metrorail extension, or in the interim, funding of a Bus Rapid Transit System. Any development or redevelopment occurring prior to the funding of the Metrorail extension should not preclude higher-intensity transit-oriented development that is envisioned in the future. …” MODIFY: Fairfax County Comprehensive Plan, 2017 Edition, Area III, Fairfax Center Area, Amended through 7-31-2018, Land Use Plan Recommendations – Suburban Center Core Area, Land Unit A, Land Use Recommendations, page 37: “Sub-unit A1 Baseline: Mixed use up to .15 FAR Overlay: Mixed use up to .65 FAR; 1.0 FAR Sub-unit A1 consists of approximately 133 acres, including a 109.5-acre portion that and contains the Fair Oaks regional mall Regional Mall at its center (“Mall Property” or “Mall”), as shown on Figure 11. and several Several office buildings, and hotels, and other commercial uses around its the perimeter of the Mall Property occupy the approximately 24-acre remainder of the sub-unit. -
Phase II Highway Corridor Strategy Descriptions Technical
ENTRAL ORK OUNTY ONNECTIONS TUDY CENTRAL YORK COUNTY CONNECTIONS STUDY PHASE II HIGHWAY CORRIDOR STRATEGY DESCRIPTIONS PHASE II TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM SEPTEMBER 2011 Prepared for: Maine Department Maine Turnpike Authority of Transportation Prepared by: In association with: Morris Communications • Kevin Hooper Associates T.Y. Lin • Planning Decisions • Facet Decision Systems Dr. Charles Colgan, University of Southern Maine • Evan Richert Normandeau Associates • Preservation Company This document is formatted for two-sided printing. Document II-4 ENTRAL ORK OUNTY ONNECTIONS TUDY CENTRAL YORK COUNTY CONNECTIONS STUDY 1 INTRODUCTION This document summarizes the potential highway corridor improvements – called strategies – that are being tested and evaluated for Phase II of the Central York County Connections Study (CYCCS). Phase II Highway Strategies are a starting point in the development and consideration of candidate improvements for the study; they are not recommendations, nor are they the only strategies that will be studied. Phase II strategies are conceptual in nature, and not yet detailed, specific proposals. Strategies considered later in the study during Phase III, as well as those ultimately recommended by the study, may differ considerably from the initial strategies currently under evaluation in Phase II. Specific aspects of these initially proposed strategies may be dropped, carried forward or combined in different ways, depending on the results of the analyses conducted during Phase II. The study is guided by a Purpose and Need Statement, which articulates that the study is to identify transportation and related land use strategies that enhance economic development opportunities and preserve and improve the regional transportation system. Additional information on the study, including the full Purpose and Need Statement, is available at the project website: www.connectingyorkcounty.org. -
Area 15 Patchway, Filton and the Stokes
Area 15 South Gloucestershire Landscape Character Assessment Draft Proposed for Adoption 12 November 2014 Patchway, FiltonPatchway, and the Stokes Area 15 Patchway, Filton and the Stokes Contents Sketch map 208 Key characteristics 209 Location 210 Physical influences 210 Land cover 210 Settlement and infrastructure 212 Landscape character 214 The changing landscape 217 Landscape strategy 220 Photographs Landscape character area boundary www.southglos.gov.uk 207 Area 15 South Gloucestershire Landscape Character Assessment Draft Proposed for Adoption 12 November 2014 Patchway, FiltonPatchway, and the Stokes •1 â2 è18 •3 •19 •15 •21•16 å13 á14 •17 •7 å8 æ9 â13 å14 ç15 •10 •11 ã12 Figure 46 Patchway, Filton Key å15 Photograph viewpoints and the Stokes \\\ Core strategy proposed new neighbourhood Sketch Map Scale: not to scale 208 www.southglos.gov.uk Area 15 South Gloucestershire Landscape Character Assessment Draft Proposed for Adoption 12 November 2014 Patchway, FiltonPatchway, and the Stokes Area 15 Patchway, Filton and the Stokes The Patchway, Filton and the Stokes character area is an urban built up area, consisting of a mix of residential, N commercial and retail development and major transport corridors, with open space scattered throughout. Key Characteristics ¡ This area includes the settlements of ¡ Open space is diverse, currently including Patchway and Filton plus Bradley Stoke, areas of Filton Airfield much of which is Stoke Gifford, Harry Stoke and Stoke Park. proposed for development, as well as within the railway junction, the courses ¡ Largely built up area, bounded by of Patchway Brook and Stoke Brook, motorways to the north west and north part of historic Stoke Park and remnant east, with railway lines and roads dividing agricultural land. -
A6120 Outer Ring Road Improvements Roundhay Park Lane
A6120 Outer Ring Road Improvements Roundhay Park Lane Sub-carriageway ducts to be installed off-peak under single lane closures. Wherever possible, where multiple ducts e.g.. Street lighting and UTMC cross adjacent these will be installed under the same closure , in a combined trench where possible or by separate resources when there is sufficient safe ty zone between them. Main drainage crossings also installed – Not shown for clarity Drawing Title Notes UTMC duct crossing Drawing Number E17015/SK/PH-1B/1 Rev 0 Outline Phasing Plan Enabling Works – Off peak Street lighting duct crossing Issue Date 01/10/2018 NPG Diversion duct crossing Drawn By Rob Evans A6120 Outer Ring Road Improvements Roundhay Park Lane Pedestrian route to be maintained Pedestrian route to be maintained by constructing verge half and half. by constructing verge half and half. Pedestrian route diverted into Pedestrian route diverted into carriageway within TM off-peak carriageway within TM off-peak when works dictate access is when works dictate access is required to full width of verge. required to full width of verge. Pedestrian routes to be maintained on existing footway which is to be re-surfaced only. Pedestrian route to be moved on to carriageway within TM off-peak to facilitate surfacing operations. Drawing Title Key Under Construction TM Limit Drawing Number E17015/SK/PH-1B/2 Rev 0 Outline Phasing Plan Stage 1 – – Peak Time Arrangement Completed Traffic Movement Issue Date 01/10/2018 Temporary Surfacing Pedestrian Route Drawn By Rob Evans A6120 Outer Ring Road Improvements Roundhay Park Lane Pedestrian route to be maintained Pedestrian route to be maintained by constructing verge half and half. -
Autonomic Functions Implemented in Existing ITS
EU EIP SA42 Task 4 Autonomic functions implemented in existing ITS Version: 3.2 Date: 22 December 2016 http://www.its-platform.eu Document Information Authors Name Organisation Mihai Niculescu ITS Romania Florin Nemtanu ITS Romania Jacqueline Barr IBI Group Risto Kulmala Finnish Traffic Agency Jessica Rausch Hessen Mobil Ana Blanco DGT Gema Garcia ICEACSA Merja Penttinen VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Peter McGillion Transport Scotland Distribution Date Version Dissemination 29 June 2016 0.2 Internal 21 September 2016 1.3 Internal 17 November 2016 2.0 Internal 09 December 2016 3.0 Internal 19 December 2016 3.1 Internal 22 December 2016 3.2 Public EU EIP SA42, Deliverable 1 EU EIP EU EIP A42/2016/N°1 2/93 Preface This document is elaborated in the framework of Sub-activity 4.2 – Facilitating Automated Driving of the EU EIP project and represents the first deliverable of Task 4 – Automatic road side ITS systems/Automation of road operator ITS. The Sub-activity 4.2 is divided in several tasks: 0. Task management. 1. Identification of requirements. 2. Impacts and economic feasibility. 3. Road map and action plan. 4. Automation of road operator ITS. 5. Monitoring, liaison, dissemination. Task 4 will identify the requirements of automating the road operators´ ITS systems to facilitate automated vehicle – infrastructure integration. This includes the road side ITS systems with properties like: self-maintenance, self-optimisation, self-management, self- healing fully or partly based on specific needs. Secondly, the task will identify good and avoidable practices in implementing automatic functions on road side and traffic centre systems. -
Roadway &Traffic Operations Strategy
ESTABLISHING MULTI-MODAL STRATEGIES | CHAPTER 4 ROADWAY & TRAFFIC OPERATIONS STRATEGY To serve planned growth, the future transportation system needs multi-modal improvements and strategies to manage the forecasted travel demand. This chapter presents a detailed strategy to improve Moscow’s roadway network and traffic operations over the next 20 years, including network connectivity options, regional circulation enhancements, intersection modifications, and multi-modal street design guidelines. MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN This page intentionally left blank. Moscow on the Move 4 ROADWAY & TRAFFIC OPERATIONS STRATEGY Supporting the guiding principles of Moscow on the Move, the Roadway & This Transportation Traffic Operations Strategy strives to provide a truly multi-modal Commission “check mark” icon signifies transportation system and improve safety, access, and mobility for all street which actions have unanimous users by identifying strategies, policies, and projects that help achieve support from the Commission. Moscow’s vision for mobility and access. This strategy of Moscow on the Move The icon is a way to illustrate the level of support for identifies opportunities to retrofit existing streets in Moscow and develops the implementation. street grid to improve citywide connectivity for motor vehicles, pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users. This strategy specifically provides an overview of the existing traffic conditions and how conditions might change by 2035, a street network plan, various design tools that could be applied throughout the city, and descriptions of recommended street projects. FUTURE DEFICIENCIES AND NEEDS Existing and future roadway and traffic operation conditions were assessed to determine the needs and deficiencies of the system. The key areas projected to require improvement or to present future challenges are summarized below. -
STATEMENT of PERSONS NOMINATED and NOTICE of POLL Date of Election: Thursday 6 May 2021
South Gloucestershire Council STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED AND NOTICE OF POLL Date of Election: Thursday 6 May 2021 1. Polling will take place between the hours of 7:00 am to 10:00 pm on Thursday 6 May 2021, for the election of Town Councillors for each of the undermentioned town wards, there remaining in each case more validly nominated candidates than seats. 2. The name, description (if any) and address of each candidates, together with the names of proposer, seconder and assentors are shown below for each electoral area. 3. Any candidate who an entry in the last column (invalid), in no longer standing at this election 4. Where contested this poll is taken together with the election of a Police and Crime Commissioner for Avon and Somerset Police Area and the election of a Mayor for the West of England Combined Authority Bradley Stoke Town Council, North Ward (Election for ONE Councillor) Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Name of Proposer Invalid MOREY 156 Dewfalls Drive, Bradley Stoke, BS32 Hanning Katie, Gibson Christine P Angela 9BU NTEKOR 15 Foxfield Avenue, Bradley Stoke, Bristol, Conservative Party Candidate Ntekor Eric B, Markey Gifty Eugenia BS32 0BN OLIVER (address in South Gloucestershire) Labour Party Fazzino Fabrizio, Di Domenico Paola Anthony Babatunde Bradley Stoke Town Council, South Ward (Election for ONE Councillor) Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Name of Proposer Invalid HE 34 The Worthys, Bradley Stoke, Bristol, Conservative Party Candidate Tregarthen Richard C, Tregarthen Elizabeth -
OCTOBER 2013 To: 31 OCTOBER 2013
South Gloucestershire Council MONTHLY LIST OF DECISIONS BY PARISH From: 01 OCTOBER 2013 To: 31 OCTOBER 2013 Monthly List of Decisions - 01/10/2013 - 31/10/2013 APPLICATION NUMBER APPLICATION TYPE LOCATION PROPOSAL APPLICANT DATE REGISTERED DECISION DATE DECISION PARISH Almondsbury Parish Council PT13/3301/FFull Planning 1 And 2 The Dinky Main Road Change of use of ground floor Mr Terry 10/09/2013 18/10/2013 Withdrawn Easter Compton South from Retail (Class A1) to 1no. self- Whittingham Gloucestershire BS35 5SJ contained flat (Class C3) as defined in Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 (as amended). PT13/3004/RVCRemoval Var Con Unit 12A Cribbs Retail Park Removal of Condition 2 attached Cribbs Mall 14/08/2013 21/10/2013 Refusal Sec 73 Lysander Road Patchway South to PT13/1156/F re: the removal of Nominees (1) And Gloucestershire BS34 5UQ the need to provide a landscaping Cribbs Mall scheme Nominees (2) Ltd PT13/3821/FFull Planning 9 Florence Park Almondsbury Demolition of existing Mr And Mrs Martin 22/10/2013 Permitted Bristol South Gloucestershire BS32 conservatory to facilitate the Development 4HE erection of a single storey rear extension to provide additional living accommodation PT13/3380/FFull Planning Unit 13A The Venue Cribbs Creation of an external seating Nando's 17/09/2013 23/10/2013 Approve with Causeway Bristol South area with associated works. Chickenland Ltd Conditions Gloucestershire BS10 7SR PT13/3081/FFull Planning DHL International (UK) Ltd Erection of shed for a temporary D H L 28/08/2013 17/10/2013 Withdrawn Lysander Road Westbury On Trym period of two years for the storage International (UK) Bristol South Gloucestershire BS10 of pallets Ltd 7DD PT13/2146/FFull Planning Land At Catbrain Lane Erection of amenity PMH Western Ltd 25/06/2013 31/10/2013 Approved - S106 Almondsbury Bristol South Restaurant/Public House (Class Signed Gloucestershire BS10 7TQ A3/A4) with ancillary first floor staff accommodation and access, parking, landscaping and associated works. -
Study for the Ring Roads
Intelligent Transportation Systems Study for the Edmonton and Calgary Ring Roads Terms of Reference Highway Policy and Planning Branch 3rd Floor, 4999-98 Avenue Edmonton, AB T6B 2X3 March 1, 2004 Background Alberta Transportation has developed a strategic vision for implementing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) to improve the safety, capacity, and efficiency of the provincial transportation system. The ITS Strategic Plan, dated September 2000, provides a vision for the future of ITS in Alberta’s provincial highway system and outlines strategies for Alberta Transportation to develop and deploy these technologies. The ring roads in the cities of Edmonton and Calgary are top priority projects in Alberta, and they are integral components of the Trans-Canada Highway and the Trans-Canada Highway Yellowhead Route through the province. Deployment of ITS technologies will further enhance the safe and efficient operation of the ring roads in the two cities. Edmonton Ring Road – Anthony Henday Drive A major part of the Edmonton ring road, also known as Anthony Henday Drive (AHD), is located inside the city limits of Edmonton. By agreement with the City, Alberta Transportation is responsible for funding and developing AHD. AHD is part of Alberta Transportation’s initiative to provide a high standard highway trade corridor linking Alberta to the United States and Mexico. In addition, the roadway forms an important part of Edmonton’s overall transportation system and is included in the City’s Transportation Master Plan, which addresses future transportation needs to the year 2020. Growth in the Edmonton metropolitan area will reach a population of 1.17 million by 2020 with significant traffic growth at the same time. -
PR Colas Canada
PRESS RELEASE Boulogne, May 29, 2017 Two Colas Canada companies secure 300 million CAD in contracts for the construction and maintenance of the Southwest Calgary Ring Road in Alberta The Southwest Calgary Ring Road (SWCRR) Project, a PPP awarded to Mountain View Partners (MVP) 1, involves the construction and maintenance of 31 km of 6- to 8-lane highway, 14 interchanges, 47 bridges and a tunnel. Alberta Highway Services Ltd (AHSL), a Colas Canada company and subconsultant to the MVP consortium, has secured the maintenance contract for the section under construction. The contract, which will run up to 2051, amounts to 204 million Canadian dollars². AHSL is renowned for its expertise, boasting 22 years of experience on a number of maintenance and winter maintenance contracts involving roads and highways throughout the province of Alberta. Standard General Calgary, another Colas Canada company that has been a leader in road construction in the city of Calgary for more than 75 years, was contracted by the Design and Build Consortium of KGL Constructors 1 to manufacture and apply all the asphalt concrete required by the project, i.e., some one million tons, for a total of 95 million Canadian dollars. The work has started, with completion scheduled for October 2021. ¹ Mountain View Partners is a consortium comprising: Kiewit Mountain View Partners Investors Inc., Meridiam Infrastructure Mountain View ULC, CC&L MVP Holdings Ltd, LMVP Limited Partnership. KGL Constructors is a consortium comprising: Kiewit Management Co., Graham Infrastructure LP, Ledcor CMI Ltd. Operations Period Maintenance performed by: Alberta Highway Services Ltd., a Colas Canada Inc. -
Traffic Impact and Access Study, Sherwood Plaza South (SPS) – Phased Master Plan Redevelopment, Natick, Massachusetts; VHB; April 2014
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT FRAMINGHAM, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared for: Atlanta, Georgia December 2014 Prepared by: VANASSE & ASSOCIATES, INC. 35 New England Business Center Drive Suite 140 Andover, MA 01810 (978) 474-8800 www.rdva.com Copyright © 2014 by VAI All Rights Reserved CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................. 1 Future Conditions ................................................................................................................ 3 Traffic Operations Analysis ................................................................................................ 6 Parking Demand Analysis ................................................................................................... 6 Drive-Through Window Vehicle Queue Analysis .............................................................. 7 Sight Distance Evaluation ................................................................................................... 8 Recommendations ............................................................................................................... 8 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 10 Project Description ...........................................................................................................