DOCSLIB.ORG

CSMUN X Genghis Khan's Cabinet Abdel Hussien

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CSMUN X Genghis Khan's Cabinet Abdel Hussien CSMUN X Genghis Khan’s Cabinet Abdel Hussien Hello Delegates, Welcome to CSMUN X! My name is Abdelrahman Hussien and I will be your chair for Genghis Khan’s Cabinet. I’m currently a Junior and this is my third year in Model UN. My freshman year I attended CIMUN and NUMUN, as well as multiple one-day conferences. I will be moderating debate on the two selected topics for this committee, the siege of Baghdad, and empire stability. Both topics have are instrumental in ensuring a continued dominated globe under our hands. Genghis Khan’s Cabinet is a cabinet created by Genghis Khan and his closest advisors to devise plans. This cabinet aims to increase stability and create war plans to benefit our empire. These discussions allow a centralized empire and is critical to ensure the empire for generations to come. Unlike most cabinets, ours has a large force of power that is on the offensive. We are also able to finish and carry out plans more efficiently because of the common goals we have. The Cabinet does not work closely with any others, as our cabinet is largely feared by our yet to be conquered neighbors. As a chair, I hope to make your learning experience enjoyable and hope to see cooperation among the delegates to reach a successful resolution. That being said, delegates should aim to pass a resolution that is multifaceted and addresses issues faced. I recommend delegates research pre-existing empires, treaties, and organizations that have tried to solve the issue. If you have any questions about how committee will be run, topics, or just MUN in general, feel free to email me. Hope to see you all in October! Best Wishes, Abdel Hussien [email protected] Topic A: Siege of Baghdad History and Situation The Mongol Empire is widely regarded as one of the most powerful and tactical empires the world has ever seen. Founded by Gegnhis Khan in 1206, the empire began with a small group of Mongols from the Steppes of Asia. However, this group of nomads were unlike any other. The war abilities of the Mongols gave them an upper hand regardless of their opponents. The archers, for example, are some of the finest men to have ever practiced the craft. The horsemen are trained as youth to be the most notable horse riders in history. Genghis Khan’s brutal upbringing crafted him into the elite leader that lead with an iron fist. Early in his life, Genghis Khan lost his parents and was left to fend for himself. Ghengis rose to power early in his life, and led without regards to the status quo. For example, he hired his advisors without regards to kin. Although he ruled with an iron fist and spread his power with nonstop onslaughts, Genghis Khan was also a man of knowledge. He granted religious freedom to his subjects, abolished torture, ​ encouraged trade and created the first international postal system. This earned him the name that he is now known by “Genghis Khan” which means the universal ruler. The conquests of the Mongols began with numerous fatalities and bloodshed. This gave Genghis Khan an infamous reputation, striking fear in the hearts of the opposition. Entire cities would kneel before him and surrender before he even got to the country. This allowed Genghis Khan to use fear as leverage in his battle strategies. Any empire or city that resisted his power would be ransacked and burned to ashes. As they expanded into the Middle East, Mongol forces were confronted by the Abbassid Caliphate and showed no mercy to the resistance. The Mongol battle strategies were not only centered around fear and intimidation. As a matter of fact, Genghis Khan and his generals were astounding tacticians. They had a multitude of battle strategies prior to actual battle. For one, Genghis was known for his extensive network of spies that would gather information on local defenses and infrastructure. The information gathered could be reported quickly because of the information delivery systems they implemented throughout the empire. In battle, Genghis Khan was notorious for masking the true intentions and size of his army. Genghis would put straw soldier and light extra campfires to create the illusion of a larger army. Khan was also known for his feigned retreat strategy, in which the army would pretend to run to draw opposition then surround them. Finally, the most important for the topic at hand, the isolation strategy was used to punish those resisting. This brutal strategy lead to the deaths of civilians as well, giving the Mongols a terrible reputation. The Abbasid Caliphate was the successor to the Umayyad Empire. Although it had many capitals such as Cairo, Damascus, and Kufa, the empire was mainly ruled from Baghdad. Prior to the Mongols’ arrival, the Abbasid Empire had been standing for over three centuries. The massive empire stretched through the Arabian Peninsula, North Africa, the Levant, Syria, Iraq, Persia and beyond to modern Afghanistan. The Abbasid Caliphate marked the golden age of Muslims in the Middle East. In contrast to the Mongols, the Abbasid Empire was not focused on war strategies or being spread by the sword. Instead, this empire of scholars was the most educationally geared empires of its time. The love for knowledge was evident in Baghdad, where doctors, scholars, and students all gathered in this hub of education to exchange information. In fact, here, many Greek texts were translated in order to allow easier access for the rest of the world. Genghis Khan practiced iconoclasm, and all prints of himself were made after his death. Bigger Issue The resistance of Baghdad is an issue not to be taken lightly. Although the resistance may only cause a small disruption in the onslaught of the Mongols, it is symbolic of what may occur in the future. If other empires see our blood, our intimidation abilities will decrease and we will not be able to take many other cities through fear alone. Furthermore, previously captured armies may attempt to join the Abbasid forces in an effort to overthrow Genghis Khan. We cannot allow this resistance to be a beacon of hope for other empires, and must terminate it as soon as possible. Failure to respond effectively and with great display of power will result in detrimental consequences for our empire. Of those consequences, most are directly due to further resistance. This will not only exhaust our armies, but also limits our capabilities in further conquests. Another consequence stemming from the Baghdad resistance is the spoils within the cities. If force is required, we will not be able to reap the monetary benefits or educational values as effectively as if the Caliphate surrendered to us. The Abbasid Empire’s strategies also threaten many of the strategies of the Mongols. Baghdad is surrounded by a great wall which protects it from simple attacks of calvary and makes it easy to fend of intruders. However, internal forces are not the only ones the Mongols must worry about. The Abbasids have created strong allies that surround them, such as the Caroliginian alliance. These external forces pose as threats to the Mongol forces. Our current goals are to rule the world and leave a lasting name that will be remembered for generations. If the Mongols fail to secure this city, the legacy will die and our opponents will continue through our land. Not only will we lose our land, but we will lose our progress and ultimately the goal of having rule over the world. It is crucial to the future generations of this empire to secure this city and restore its once feared name. Committee Involvement Genghis Khan and his war generals have the fate of the Abbasid Empires at their fingertips. They have the ability to declare war, move troops and implement spies against the Abbasid Empire. The Cabinet has the ability to do anything for the good of the empire, regardless of potential turmoil with surrounding empires. However, as the Abbasid Empire continues preparations for the war, it is important that the committee acts fast to end the resistance. Our strategies must be devised prior to our arrival at the Baghdad gates, and must be brutal enough to silence any further outcries from neighboring cities. While devising this plan, it is important to keep in mind the different interests and outcomes that come with each plan. For example, simply burning the city to its feet will leave nothing of value for the Mongols. However, and attack too light may resemble weakness of the Mongol Empire. The cabinet must discuss and evaluate all possibilities before deciding to follow through with the attack. Recent Updates The Mongol Empire has been very successful in its continued conquests across Afro Eurasia. They have conquered many empires without the use of force, which is why the infrastructure within the empire is so powerful. It has allowed the Mongols to also keep from using resources, so our armies do not become weakened by overuse and exhaustion. However, the mongols have now encountered a new enemy that refuses to stand down. Genghis Khan has sent a messenger to the Khalifa of the Abbasid Empire, however, after a long time of waiting, no response has been returned. Subsequently, Genghis Khan began taking operations into his own hands. He sent his spies into the Abbasid Empire, where they infiltrated Baghdad and recovered valuable information. They have uncovered the true intentions of the Khalifa, who plans to rage war. The Abbassids have already begun war preparations and the standing army has started on its journey to the eastern front.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Great Empires of Asia the Great Empires of Asia
    The Great Empires of Asia The Great Empires of Asia EDITED BY JIM MASSELOS FOREWORD BY JONATHAN FENBY WITH 27 ILLUSTRATIONS Note on spellings and transliterations There is no single agreed system for transliterating into the Western CONTENTS alphabet names, titles and terms from the different cultures and languages represented in this book. Each culture has separate traditions FOREWORD 8 for the most ‘correct’ way in which words should be transliterated from The Legacy of Empire Arabic and other scripts. However, to avoid any potential confusion JONATHAN FENBY to the non-specialist reader, in this volume we have adopted a single system of spellings and have generally used the versions of names and titles that will be most familiar to Western readers. INTRODUCTION 14 The Distinctiveness of Asian Empires JIM MASSELOS Elements of Empire Emperors and Empires Maintaining Empire Advancing Empire CHAPTER ONE 27 Central Asia: The Mongols 1206–1405 On the cover: Map of Unidentified Islands off the Southern Anatolian Coast, by Ottoman admiral and geographer Piri Reis (1465–1555). TIMOTHY MAY Photo: The Walters Art Museum, Baltimore. The Rise of Chinggis Khan The Empire after Chinggis Khan First published in the United Kingdom in 2010 by Thames & Hudson Ltd, 181A High Holborn, London WC1V 7QX The Army of the Empire Civil Government This compact paperback edition first published in 2018 The Rule of Law The Great Empires of Asia © 2010 and 2018 Decline and Dissolution Thames & Hudson Ltd, London The Greatness of the Mongol Empire Foreword © 2018 Jonathan Fenby All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced CHAPTER TWO 53 or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, China: The Ming 1368–1644 including photocopy, recording or any other information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Wisdom
    House of Wisdom ,romanized: Bayt al-Ḥikmah), alsoبيت الحكمة :The House of Wisdom (Arabic known as the Grand Library of Baghdad, refers to either a major Abbasid public academy and intellectual center in Baghdad or to a large private library belonging to the Abbasid Caliphs during the Islamic Golden Age.[1][2] The House of Wisdom is the subject of an active dispute over its functions and existence as a formal academy, an issue complicated by a lack of physical evidence following the collapse of the Abbasid Caliphate and a reliance on corroboration of literary sources to construct a narrative. The House of Wisdom was founded either as a library for the collections of the Caliph Harun al-Rashid in the late 8th century (then later turned into a public academy during the reign of Al-Ma'mun) or was a private collection created by Al-Mansur (reign 754–775) to house rare books and collections of poetry in both Arabic and Persian.[1][3] The House of Wisdom and its contents were destroyed in the Siege of Baghdad in 1258, leaving very little in the way of archaeological evidence for the House of Wisdom, such that most knowledge about it is derived from the works of contemporary scholars of the era such as Al-Tabari and Ibn al-Nadim. The House of Wisdom existed as a part of the major Translation Movement taking place during the Abbasid Era, translating works from Greek and Syriac to Arabic, but it is unlikely that the House of Wisdom existed as the sole center of such work, as major translation efforts arose in Cairo and Damascus even earlier than
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Territories and Empires: from Mongol Ulus to Russian Siberia1200-1800 Stephen Kotkin
    Defining Territories and Empires: from Mongol Ulus to Russian Siberia1200-1800 Stephen Kotkin (Princeton University) Copyright (c) 1996 by the Slavic Research Center All rights reserved. The Russian empire's eventual displacement of the thirteenth-century Mongol ulus in Eurasia seems self-evident. The overthrow of the foreign yoke, defeat of various khanates, and conquest of Siberia constitute core aspects of the narratives on the formation of Russia's identity and political institutions. To those who disavow the Mongol influence, the Byzantine tradition serves as a counterweight. But the geopolitical turnabout is not a matter of dispute. Where Chingis Khan and his many descendants once held sway, the Riurikids (succeeded by the Romanovs) moved in. *1 Rather than the shortlived but ramified Mongol hegemony, which was mostly limited to the middle and southern parts of Eurasia, longterm overviews of the lands that became known as Siberia, or of its various subregions, typically begin with a chapter on "pre-history," which extends from the paleolithic to the moment of Russian arrival in the late sixteenth, early seventeenth centuries. *2 The goal is usually to enable the reader to understand what "human material" the Russians found and what "progress" was then achieved. Inherent in the narratives -- however sympathetic they may or may not be to the native peoples -- are assumptions about the historical advance deriving from the Russian arrival and socio-economic transformation. In short, the narratives are involved in legitimating Russia's conquest without any notion of alternatives. Of course, history can also be used to show that what seems natural did not exist forever but came into being; to reveal that there were other modes of existence, which were either pushed aside or folded into what then came to seem irreversible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jalayirids Dynastic State Formation in the Mongol Middle East
    THE JALAYIRIDS DYNASTIC STATE FORMATION IN THE MONGOL MIDDLE EAST 1 PATRICK WING THE JALAYIRIDS The Royal Asiatic Society was founded in 1823 ‘for the investigation of subjects connected with, and for the encouragement of science, literature and the arts in relation to Asia’. Informed by these goals, the policy of the Society’s Editorial Board is to make available in appropriate formats the results of original research in the humanities and social sciences having to do with Asia, defined in the broadest geographical and cultural sense and up to the present day. The Monograph Board Professor Francis Robinson CBE, Royal Holloway, University of London (Chair) Professor Tim Barrett, SOAS, University of London Dr Evrim Binbas¸, Royal Holloway, University of London Dr Barbara M. C. Brend Professor Anna Contadini, SOAS, University of London Professor Michael Feener, National University of Singapore Dr Gordon Johnson, University of Cambridge Dr Rosie Llewellyn Jones MBE Professor David Morgan, University of Wisconsin- Madison Professor Rosalind O’Hanlon, University of Oxford Dr Alison Ohta, Director, Royal Asiatic Society For a full list of publications by the Royal Asiatic Society see www.royalasiaticsociety.org THE JALAYIRIDS DYNASTIC STATE FORMATION IN THE MONGOL MIDDLE EAST 2 Patrick Wing For E. L., E. L. and E. G. © Patrick Wing, 2016 Edinburgh University Press Ltd The Tun – Holyrood Road 12 (2f) Jackson’s Entry Edinburgh EH8 8PJ www.euppublishing.com Typeset in 11 /13 JaghbUni Regular by Servis Filmsetting Ltd, Stockport, Cheshire and printed and bound in Great Britain by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon CR0 4YY A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 1 4744 0225 5 (hardback) ISBN 978 1 4744 0226 2 (webready PDF) ISBN 978 1 4744 1093 9 (epub) The right of Patrick Wing to be identified as author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 and the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003 (SI No.
    [Show full text]
  • Caliph Al-Mansur and Hulagu Khan an Analysis of Their Political Strategies in the Light of Machiavellianism
    CALIPH AL-MANSUR AND HULAGU KHAN AN ANALYSIS OF THEIR POLITICAL STRATEGIES IN THE LIGHT OF MACHIAVELLIANISM BY SAYMA AAMAL SIDDIQ A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Human Sciences in History and Civilization Kulliyyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences International Islamic University Malaysia SEPTEMBER 2016 ABSTRACT This research discusses life and careers of the Mongol Khan Hulagu and the Abbasid Caliph Mansur in the light of the Machiavellian leadership theory. It aims to explore whether Machiavellianism is a necessary attribute in ensuring an undisputed rule or dominion. Although Machiavelli’s advocacy of ruthlessness and deception promises a successful, unchallenged reign, it largely ignores the psychological aspect as well as the repercussions of suppressing the spiritual self. With reference to al-Mansur, who epitomized the Machiavellian prince, it can be deduced that this eventually leads to psychological trauma, as a result of guilt and fear of retribution, casting a shadow on one’s political success. Thus, this questions the adequacy of The Prince as a practical philosophy, and shifts attention to the all-encompassing nature of Islam which secures political stability and success, without having to sacrifice moral consciousness. Hulagu, whose mission was to restore peace and justice (along with securing Mongol dominion) in the troubled lands of Persia and Iraq, leaned more towards Islamic principles than Machiavellianism in conducting his conquests. Though Hulagu’s career eventually faltered as a result of military defeats, the foundations laid by him contributed to the prosperity of the Ilkhanid Dynasty, which only came to an end due to biological (not political) causes as the last Ilkhan died childless.
    [Show full text]
  • Bentleynziegleronmongols10pg.Pdf
    peoples embarked on new campaigns of expansion that eventually brought most of 1055 Tughril Beg named sultan India, much of central Asia, all of Anato- 1071 Battle of Manzikert |: lia, and a good portion of eastern Europe 1206-1227 Reign of Chinggis Khan I under their domination. 1211-1234 Mongol conquest of northern China The military campaigns of nomadic I peoples were sometimes exceedingly de- 1219-1221 Mongol conquest of Persia ! structive. Nomadic warriors demolished 1237-1241 Mongol conquest of Russia cities, slaughtered urban populations, and 1258 Mongol capture of Baghdad ravaged surrounding agricultural lands. 1264-1279 Mongol conquest of southern China Yet those same forces also encouraged systematic peaceful interaction between 1264-1294 Reign of Khubilai Khan peoples of different societies. Between 1279-1368 Yuan dynasty the eleventh and fifteenth centuries, the 1295 Conversion of llkhan Ghazan to Islam imperial campaigns of Turkish and Mon­ gol peoples forged closer links than ever 1336-1405 Life of Tamerlane before between Eurasian lands. By fos- 1453 Ottoman capture of Constantinople i tering cross-cultural communication and exchange on an unprecedented scale, the Chinese dynasty replaced the Mongol state in China, the Mon­ nomadic empires integrated the lives of peoples throughout gols continued to threaten its central Asian frontier. Moreover, much of the eastern hemisphere. from the fourteenth through the seventeenth century, Turkish Jerry H. Bentley, Herbert, F. Ziegler, Heather E. Streets-Salter, Tradition and Encounters: A Brief Global History, Vol. 1 (3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2014). TURKISH MIGRATIONS AND Nomadic Peoples and Their Animals Nomadic peo­ ples drove their herds and flocks to lands with abundant IMPERIAL EXPANSION grass and then moved them along as the animals thinned Turkish peoples never formed a single, homogeneous group the vegetation.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Shamanic Empire of the Early Qing, Its Role in Inner Asian
    THE SHAMANIC EMPIRE AND THE HEAVENLY ASTUTE KHAN: ANALYSIS OF THE SHAMANIC EMPIRE OF THE EARLY QING, ITS ROLE IN INNER ASIAN HEGEMONY, THE NATURE OF SHAMANIC KHANSHIP, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR MANCHU IDENTITY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI’I AT MANOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN HISTORY May 2020 By Stephen Garrett Thesis Committee: Shana Brown, Chairperson Edward Davis Wensheng Wang Keywords: Qing Dynasty, Manchu, Mongol, Inner Asia, Shamanism, Religion and Empire Acknowledgments: I would like to first and foremost show my deepest gratitude to my master’s thesis advisor, Dr. Shana Brown, whose ongoing uplifting support and instrumental advice were central to my academic success, without which I couldn’t have reached the finish line. I would also like to extend deepest thanks to my master’s thesis committee members Dr. Edward Davis and Dr. Wensheng Wang, who freely offered their time, efforts, and expertise to support me during this thesis project. Additionally, I would like to extend thanks to Dr. Mathew Lauzon and Dr. Matthew Romaniello, who both offered a great deal of academic and career advice, for which I am greatly appreciative. Special thanks to my peers: Ryan Fleming, Reed Riggs, Sun Yunhe, Wong Wengpok, and the many other friends and colleagues I have made during my time at the University of Hawaii at Manoa. They have always been a wellspring of academic advice, discussion, and support. While writing my master’s thesis, I have had the pleasure of working with the wonderful professional staff and faculty of the University of Hawaii at Manoa, whose instruction and support were invaluable to my academic success.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of American Science 2013;9(4S)
    Journal of American Science 2013;9(4s) http://www.jofamericanscience.org Analysis of the role and position of Ibn Alqami in the fall of the Abbasid caliphate Elham Shafiee Alavijeh, Saeed Mohammadkhani (Corresponding Author) M.Sc in Iran History (Islamic Era), Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran Abstract: With strengthening of caliphate in al-Naser Bellah era, Shiites estates was improved as far as four caliph ministers had Shiite religious and even al-Nser was accused that he had accepted Emamie religious. So, on that time, contrast of two large powers, that is, caliph and Sultan Mohammad appeared and Sultan Mohammad Kharazmshahi, that his throne had not been approved by caliph, decided to give the throne to Sadat Alavi and as a result of these situations, Sultan decided to allegiance with Seyed Alaolmolk Tarmazi. Although this action was done only for political reasons but a fact was hidden in it which was strengthening of Shiites and Alavians. In the time of three next Caliphs Caliphate - Zaaher, Mustansir and Musta’sim - the situations changed a bit for the Shiites and there was not the relaxation situation as like as time of Naser caliphate any more, but still Shiites have power in government and Shiite ministers were at head of affairs. The issue of presence of Shiite’s ministers in government of Sunnite’s caliphs is one of the interesting points on that times, as far as this issue has prompted to bring theories and ideas on attempts and actions of Shiites and at head of them, Ibn Alqami-Musta’sims' minister-in accommodation with Mongols in order to fall of caliphate.
    [Show full text]
  • Transformation of the Tax System During the Middle Ages: the Case of Russia
    European Research Studies Journal Volume XXI, Issue 3, 2018 pp. 242-253 Transformation of the Tax System During the Middle Ages: The Case of Russia A.Z. Nigamaev1, A.R. Gapsalamov2, E.M. Akhmetshin3, A.V. Pavlyuk4, N.A. Prodanova5, D.V. Savchenkova6 Abstract: The reorganization of the world and its globalization, a new turn of migration processes led to the appearance of problems that had not previously disturbed into the modern society. Consequently, nowadays there is a need to study the historical past so that we could understand the modern trends. The origin of modern problems, phenomena, processes and, especially, their appearance can be traced using the example of economic and political systems that have existed before. In this regard, it would be especially interesting to trace the specific aspects of modern taxation, why the Eastern and European tax collection systems occurred to be different, what influenced the formation of the mechanism of tax collection in different countries in the past, and, most importantly, how the interaction of the Asian and European taxation systems created the specifics of tax collection in the "middle" countries of Eastern Europe. The presented article is devoted to the analysis of the development of the taxation system of the feudal states of Eastern Europe such as Volga Bulgaria, Ulus Dzhuchi and the Kazan vilayet in the first half of the 16th century. While comparing them with the fiscal systems of the countries of the Muslim East, using the reports of Arab-Persian travelers, information from the Russian sources and information from Khan yarlyks, the authors analyze the diversity in the evolution of the of tax system and the extortion of a huge part of the population of Eastern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • A Catalog of Names from the Secret History of the Mongols
    A Catalog of Names from the Secret History of the Mongols compiled by Heather Daveno with assistance from Crystal Lin Smithwick, 1988 AugustPhoenixHats.com [email protected] Page Name Male Fem Tribe Notes from the text # Achigh Shirun x 84 Kereyid Leader of the Tubegan clan. Aguchu the Brave x 59 Leader of the Tayichigud clan. Ajai x 70 Tatar Ajinai x 126 Akhutai x 142 Al Alta x 148 "The Golden One" Alagh x 66 Alagh Yid x 82 Ala Khush Digid Khuri x 126 Mohammedan (Persia / Iran) She gave birth to five sons, who each Alan the Fair x 4, 10 Khorilar founded a clan. Alan Ghoa Glossary lists her as Alan Ghoa. Alchi x 126 Alchidai Khachigun x 14 Al Diger x 149 Altan x 11 Altani x 136 Altun Ashugh x 71 Ambaghai x 10 He was the first of the Tayichigud clan. Arkhai Khasar x 50 Arslan x 147 Kharlugh Arasen x 192 Asha Gambu x 172 He was a Tanghut minister. --B-- Badai x 82 He was a herdsman. He was a son of Bodonchar, whose wife was captured from a neighboring tribe. Bagaridai x 10 Bagaridai means "The Captured One." He was the first of the Bagarin clan. Bala x 125 He was a leader of the Jalayir clan. Barghujin x 4 Bartan the Brave x 10 Glossary lists him as Bartan Bagatur. Born of a blue-grey wolf and a fallow deer, Batachikhan x 3 he was the first human of the Mongol race. Batu x 182 Founder of the Golden Horde of Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Bee Final Round
    IHBB 2015-2016 Beta Bee: New Zealand Bee Final Round (1) In 1979, the strongest of these events, Tip, killed 13 Marines in a fire on Guam. In 2013, cities in Palau were completely destroyed and thousands of people were killed when Tacloban City was hit by the eyewall of one of these named Haiyan. The Philippines and West Pacific are struck by, for the point, what tropical cyclonic storm systems, otherwise called hurricanes when they strike in the Atlantic? ANSWER: typhoon (prompt on "cyclones" or "storms"; do not accept "hurricanes") (2) During this man’s visit to the United States, he was prohibited from visiting Disneyland for security reasons and he visited Roswell Garst’s farm in Iowa. This man debated with Richard Nixon in the Kitchen Debate, and banged a shoe on the podium during a UN address, claiming "we will bury you!" This man gave the "Secret Speech" denouncing his predecessor’s policies and purges. For the point, name this Soviet Premier who put authorized placing nuclear missiles on Cuba, igniting the Cuban Missile Crisis. ANSWER: Nikita Sergeyevich Khrushchev (3) The most recent of these events took place at Punggye-ri in 2013. Two of these called Operation Totem took place at Emu Field. Protests against these events at Moruroa were to be joined by the Rainbow Warrior when it was sunk by the French. The first of these events inspired one observer to quote the Bhagavad Gita, and Novaya Zemlya was the site of the largest of these events, which used Tsar Bomba. For the point, name these experiments carried out by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Dietary Decadence and Dynastic Decline in the Mongol Empire” by John Masson Smith, Jr
    Asian Topics in World History | Columbia University http://afe.easia.columbia.edu/mongols THE MONGOLS IN WORLD HISTORY “Dietary Decadence and Dynastic Decline in the Mongol Empire” by John Masson Smith, Jr. Journal of Asian History, vol. 34, no. 1, 2000 Reprinted with permission from the publisher, Harrassowitz Publishing House. Most Mongol rulers lived short lives. Those in the Middle East died, on average, at about age 38, and the successors of Qubilai (Khubilai) in the Far East at 33 (adding in Qubilai raises the average since he lived, atypically, for 78 years; Chinggis lived into his 60s; for the rest, few passed 50). Comparison of the Mongol and Manchu (Qing) dynasties shows the importance of longevity. In each of the Mongol realms of China, the Middle East and the Golden Horde, an average of eleven Mongols ruled for an average of about a century (107 years): Qubilai and nine successors ruled China for 110 years (1260-1370); the Golden Horde had twelve khans in 132 years (1227-1359); and nine Mongols held the Middle East for 80 years (1255-1335). Nine Manchus, with an average reign of 29 years, occupied the throne of China for over two and a half centuries (1644 -1908). The Middle Eastern Mongol dynasty had further problems: high infant mortality and infertility. Ann Lambton considers that “the possibility cannot be ruled out that once the Mongols settled in Persia, they ceased to be good breeders.”1 I suggest that the Mongols’ difficulties stemmed in large part from dietary inadequacies and improprieties. The diet of pre-imperial Mongols was simple, calorically-sufficient -- and poorly balanced.
    [Show full text]