DOCSLIB.ORG

Journal of American Science 2013;9(4S)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Journal of American Science 2013;9(4S) Journal of American Science 2013;9(4s) http://www.jofamericanscience.org Analysis of the role and position of Ibn Alqami in the fall of the Abbasid caliphate Elham Shafiee Alavijeh, Saeed Mohammadkhani (Corresponding Author) M.Sc in Iran History (Islamic Era), Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran Abstract: With strengthening of caliphate in al-Naser Bellah era, Shiites estates was improved as far as four caliph ministers had Shiite religious and even al-Nser was accused that he had accepted Emamie religious. So, on that time, contrast of two large powers, that is, caliph and Sultan Mohammad appeared and Sultan Mohammad Kharazmshahi, that his throne had not been approved by caliph, decided to give the throne to Sadat Alavi and as a result of these situations, Sultan decided to allegiance with Seyed Alaolmolk Tarmazi. Although this action was done only for political reasons but a fact was hidden in it which was strengthening of Shiites and Alavians. In the time of three next Caliphs Caliphate - Zaaher, Mustansir and Musta’sim - the situations changed a bit for the Shiites and there was not the relaxation situation as like as time of Naser caliphate any more, but still Shiites have power in government and Shiite ministers were at head of affairs. The issue of presence of Shiite’s ministers in government of Sunnite’s caliphs is one of the interesting points on that times, as far as this issue has prompted to bring theories and ideas on attempts and actions of Shiites and at head of them, Ibn Alqami-Musta’sims' minister-in accommodation with Mongols in order to fall of caliphate. In this paper, that it study the issue with descriptive - analytical method with using library resources, has being discussed the role and position of the Shiites and in the head of them, Ibn Alqami in the fall of the caliphate of Baghdad. [Elham Shafiee Alavijeh, Saeed Mohammadkhani. Analysis of the role and position of Ibn Alqami in the fall of the Abbasi caliphate. J Am Sci 2013;9(4s):75-82]. (ISSN: 1545-1003). http://www.jofamericanscience.org. 13 Keywords: Abbasid Caliphate, Mongols, Hülegü, Ibn Alqami, Shiite, Musta’sim 1. Introduction At that time, the majority of people in Abbasi caliphs after faring the depressions important and magnificent cities such as Hilla, Kufa, due to Ale Bouye and the seljuks throne, they began Najaf and Karbala Shiite minority also occupied in recovering of political power in Rashed and other cites in separate areas. (Bayani, 1370, vol 1: Mostarshid caliphate’ ages and started actions 311) culminated by them in the Naser al-Din Allah ages. Musta’sim was expressing to trust his In addition to extension military and political actions Shiite minister, Ibn Alqamy, to the end of his in this era, we are witnessing the presence of the caliphate and this issue has frequently been recorded Shiites in Caliphate system and at head of affairs. by historians.Menhaj al-Siraj quotes an incident in Abbasi caliphs had adopting enmity and virulence which the Sultan Mojahed al-Din Ibek seeking to with Shiites, changed their political outline and make caliph to be pessimistic than Ibn Alqami, but approached Shiites; the power being although small the Caliph was refusing and saying: "this was due to but using from governor positions in past eras and Ibek Davaatdar attempt otherwise the minister had placed at head of affairs gradually. In fact, it can wouldn’t do such that."(Menhaj al-seraj, 1343; 193) be told that situations of society had enforced caliphs "Bayani" in his book named "religion and to submit and accept this faction. This growing trend government" writes: "Sunnite, official religious of remained by Shiites to the end of the Abbasid Iran, was only link between the Iranian governments caliphate, and the trend continued after Nasser in and Baghdad. But the Shiites, who had been Zaaher and Mustansir caliphate. Last Abbasi Caliph sustaining the suffer of Abbasid capture over ages, Caliphate, Musta’sim, began under circumstances were considering caliphs usurpers relying on the which Shiites’ society was at the top of scepter. position of the dynasty of Emam Ali, and for this Baghdad circumstances during this period reason they were going to get right to rightful. So were somewhat convulsive. Shiites had been getting they prompt insecurity in government system through to better position Due to the presence of the Shiite penetrating in government gradually and getting minister (Ibn Alqami) had better position in the court, sensible occupations and creating duplicity and sought to flaunt this headship to Sunnites and for this invoking the minority in Arab Iraq cities and country reason, contentions were been occurred among these especially in Baghdad and holly sepultures and two factions that of their most important was finally Shiites could extirpate the Abbasid caliphate contention between Shiites and Sunnis faction in the by Mongols... "(Bayani, 1370, vol 1: 258) year 654 A.H. Dastgheib have the same opinion with Bayani and says: if leaders of Hanafi and Shafei http://www.jofamericanscience.org 75 [email protected] Journal of American Science 2013;9(4s) http://www.jofamericanscience.org factions considered Changizkhan’ Maori al-Nahr as fell to incredible actions against their same religious divine ire that against him is with divine destiny. Ibn including Rey residents who victimized by religious Alqami and his consulters could assume Hülegü as differences between shafeian and Hanafi an and the his own rescuer but from other type and for the other side,the people of Qom were massacred with overthrowing of the caliphate at that time they could Muslims slander of Mongol army, " they said the exploit of the Mongol dynasty "(the Dastgheib, 1367: massacre of Qom residents is an acceptable action 369) and it is required reward, because they have heretic The presence ministers and Shiite leaders (Shiite ) religious...they guillotined lords of Qom and in the court of Sunnite caliphs have led to form its areas and captured their wife and children. different opinions and ideas about the Shiite effort "(Mirkhand, 1339, vol 5: 55) and actions to overthrowing the caliphate. Some Shiites surrendered in a relatively harmonious writers and researchers have created special for Ibn movement during the Mongol invasions,. many Alqami role, Shiite religious ‘s minister of caliphate – examples from such actions can be seen among the Musta’sim- in overthrowing of Baghdad caliphate Shiites during this period,, for example, in Balkh and his assistance with Mongols and in contrast some province, said a group of the leaders pretended Illian, groups have refused any kind of relevance between "Fifty thousand masters and Elders and leaders who the minister and Mongols. have been living in Balkh and the lord... all In the present study, we have attempted in celebrities and elders of Balkh big city welcomed adition to detail the existing circumstances in caliph's with offering many presents. "(Mirkhand, 1339, vol court and in community,it be expressed Alqami ‘s 5: 108) involvement or non-involvement – Shiite religious Ala'al-Din Sharif, superintendent of minister, Musta’sim – in presence of Mongols in Hamadan, "He went back and obeyed that order" Baghdad and the overthrow of the Mongols in while approaching the Mongols city. (Nasavi, 1344: caliphate system. 97) As mentioned Mongols didn’t believed The circumstances of political Muslims special faiths and this had led to religious peace community: among them as religion and faction didn’t concern for According to the Mongols faith-related them and only important problem for them was principles and conditions existing in their society, coquetting and every assist them in this way, they humanity, and tolerance was futile for them and for were welcoming him. this reason they put behind many killings and The people made not any considerable destructions in many captured lands.these incidents action. They either have been seeking their gains or was not adequate for arousing Muslims society in that trying to eliminate their religious reveals by using time, and they assisted infestants than percept of occurred circumstances and also some people had occurred incident and attempt for opposition whit it been affected by society circumstance hadn’t been to dispossess their spiritual competitors. minding living, were not auctioning. Its authentic method was in which the Shiites and Sunnites and Ismailians decided to Shiite and Sunnite and directed system on them were eliminate each other and solicit assistant from utilizing unity path and they were resisting in Mongols. opposition with this foreign infestant which was only Ibn Athir has expressed his regret about bringing demolition. But they bided the path for entry the directed circumstances on Muslim communities of enemy to their lands by choosing concision path and wanted to help Islam and Muslims. (Alkaml Fi and with their animosities and along with it they Altarikh, vol 12: 361, quoted by Turkamani Azar, ruined their and people lives in this way. 1385: 233) In other side, people help with the unity against Mongols and they concerned their benefits as well Ruling circumstances over court: and some groups were going to extirpate the spiritual Musta’sim (640-656 A.H) was the last revals. Some people were secluded due to existing Abbasi Caliph; so his caliphate is important for circumstances and they had become non-sensible Islamic community. than living. In the year 642 A.C. Shiite Ibn Alqami Shiites and Ismailians and Sunnites, each became minister of Musta’sim. Although ministry communicated with Mongols to eliminating rival and was provided by Shiites in this period but dominance invoked Mongols against their opposition faction in of Sunnites was significant and the court was next stage dominated by them and caliphate politics were along They were seeking to poney their religious with them.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Rise and Fall of the Early ʿabbāsid Political and Military Elite
    Hugh Kennedy The Rise and Fall of the Early ʿAbbāsid Political and MilitaryElite Abstract: This paper explores the composition and role of the military and polit- ical elite of the early ʿ Abbāsid caliphate (750 –809) whose support enabled the caliphs to maintain sovereignty over theirfar-flungdomains. It considers the im- portance of different groups,includingmembers of the ʿAbb āsid family, military commanders from Khurāsānand members of powerful and wealthyfamilies like the Muhallabī sand the Shaybāni tribal chiefs.The paper concludes with adis- cussion of the reasons for the disappearance and effective extinction of this elite in the yearsafter the great civil warthat followed Hā rūnal-Rashīd’s death in 809. Keywords: Caliphs; armies; political power;Syria; Khurāsān The governance of the early ʿAbb āsid caliphate was aremarkable political and organizational achievement.For half acentury, between the establishment of the dynasty in 132H/750 CE and the death of Hārūna l-Rashīdin193 H/809 CE, the area from Tunisia in the west to Sind and Central Asia in the east was governedeffectively and largely peacefullyfrom Iraq. From 145H/762 CE, the city of Baghdad served as the administrativecapital, though the distances which separated it from the far-flungprovinces wereenormous: it is over 2,000 kilometres from Baghdad to Merv,the political centre of the great province of Khurāsān, and 1,500 kilometres from the capital to the HolyCity of Mecca. The barīd postal system inherited from the Umayyads and Sasanians was surprisingly effective at communicatingurgent messages over these huge distan- ces.¹ When the caliph al-Rashīdd ied in the year 809 at Ṭūs( near Mashhad in north-east Iran) amessenger broughtthe news to Baghdadintwelvedays, trav- eling 1,900 kilometres at an averagespeed of 150 kilometres per day.
    [Show full text]
  • Longing for the Lost Caliphate
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. Introduction The cosmopolitan, scholarly language of Islamic religious discourse cuts across multiple frontiers, constructing a universe of reciprocal benefit to those who master it. This religious discourse is at once flexible and transferable across time and space. Not only did it span the known world of the fourteenth century, but it also persisted across the vicissitudes of political and economic change that separated the premodern from the modern world system. —Muslim Networks from Hajj to Hip Hop, ed. Miriam Cooke and Bruce Lawrence1 Overall, the best historians of memory are like the ogre who looks for human voices and emotions. They capture the haunted images of the past that hover in a given society, the obsession with certain events, periods, or beliefs, and they attempt to understand how and why they made sense to people in the past. — “History and Memory,” Alon Confino2 Working at the Foreign Office in London, a British diplomat reviewed the stunning news emanating from Turkey on March 3, 1924. D. G. Osbourne had just learned of the legislative acts passed by the nascent Turkish Republic’s Grand National Assembly and updated the confidential file before him: The Caliphate of the house of Osman is abolished and all members of the house are to follow the Caliph—an d the late Sultan—int o exile. Their property is to revert to the state. Justice and education are to be entirely purged of their reli- gious associations.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline Lecture Seven—The Abbasid Dynasty and Sectarian Divides Within Islam
    Outline Lecture Seven—The Abbasid Dynasty and Sectarian Divides within Islam Key Question today: 1. How did the Abbasids’ cosmopolitan ambition as an imperial power reflect the need to accommodate the increasing diversity within the Islam? 2. What were the key sectarian splits in Islam and how did they evolve? 3. How were theological debates expressions of social, ethnic, and class tensions? I) From Arab Kingdom to Islamic Empire a) Legacy of Umayyad Caliphate b) Challenge from the East i) The impact of propaganda and social instigators ii) The insurrection of Abu Muslim c) Who were the Abbasids? i) Founder of the Abbasid line, al-Mansur (1) Claim of descent to Abu al-Abbas (Lineage) (2) Claim to Ali’s authority (Shi’a) ii) Using religion to gain legitimacy—Caesaropapism d) Abbasid Caliphate (750-1258) i) Changes brought about by Abbasids (1) Socially—Ended exclusive dominance of the Arab military aristocracy (2) Culturally—Shift center of gravity to the east, Persian heritage (a) Shift of capital from Damascus to Baghdad (3) Politically— Centralized autocracy (a) Abbasid khalifa with absolute power as “God’s Agent” (b) Al-Farabi on the role of the khalifa: (i) “He is the sovereign over whom no other human being has any sovereignty whatsoever; he is the Imam; he is the first sovereign of the excellent city, he is the sovereign of the excellent nation, and the sovereign of the universal state” (4) Militarily—Supported by professional soldiers (a) Khurusan regiments from Central Asia (b) Later Turkish slave-soldiers known as the Mamluks
    [Show full text]
  • House of Wisdom
    House of Wisdom ,romanized: Bayt al-Ḥikmah), alsoبيت الحكمة :The House of Wisdom (Arabic known as the Grand Library of Baghdad, refers to either a major Abbasid public academy and intellectual center in Baghdad or to a large private library belonging to the Abbasid Caliphs during the Islamic Golden Age.[1][2] The House of Wisdom is the subject of an active dispute over its functions and existence as a formal academy, an issue complicated by a lack of physical evidence following the collapse of the Abbasid Caliphate and a reliance on corroboration of literary sources to construct a narrative. The House of Wisdom was founded either as a library for the collections of the Caliph Harun al-Rashid in the late 8th century (then later turned into a public academy during the reign of Al-Ma'mun) or was a private collection created by Al-Mansur (reign 754–775) to house rare books and collections of poetry in both Arabic and Persian.[1][3] The House of Wisdom and its contents were destroyed in the Siege of Baghdad in 1258, leaving very little in the way of archaeological evidence for the House of Wisdom, such that most knowledge about it is derived from the works of contemporary scholars of the era such as Al-Tabari and Ibn al-Nadim. The House of Wisdom existed as a part of the major Translation Movement taking place during the Abbasid Era, translating works from Greek and Syriac to Arabic, but it is unlikely that the House of Wisdom existed as the sole center of such work, as major translation efforts arose in Cairo and Damascus even earlier than
    [Show full text]
  • The Central Islamic Lands
    77 THEME The Central Islamic 4 Lands AS we enter the twenty-first century, there are over 1 billion Muslims living in all parts of the world. They are citizens of different nations, speak different languages, and dress differently. The processes by which they became Muslims were varied, and so were the circumstances in which they went their separate ways. Yet, the Islamic community has its roots in a more unified past which unfolded roughly 1,400 years ago in the Arabian peninsula. In this chapter we are going to read about the rise of Islam and its expansion over a vast territory extending from Egypt to Afghanistan, the core area of Islamic civilisation from 600 to 1200. In these centuries, Islamic society exhibited multiple political and cultural patterns. The term Islamic is used here not only in its purely religious sense but also for the overall society and culture historically associated with Islam. In this society not everything that was happening originated directly from religion, but it took place in a society where Muslims and their faith were recognised as socially dominant. Non-Muslims always formed an integral, if subordinate, part of this society as did Jews in Christendom. Our understanding of the history of the central Islamic lands between 600 and 1200 is based on chronicles or tawarikh (which narrate events in order of time) and semi-historical works, such as biographies (sira), records of the sayings and doings of the Prophet (hadith) and commentaries on the Quran (tafsir). The material from which these works were produced was a large collection of eyewitness reports (akhbar) transmitted over a period of time either orally or on paper.
    [Show full text]
  • The Abbasid Dynasty: the Golden Age of Islamic Civilization The
    The Abbasid Dynasty: The Golden Age of Islamic Civilization The Abbasid Caliphate, which ruled the Islamic world, oversaw the golden age of Islamic culture. The dynasty ruled the Islamic Caliphate from 750 to 1258 AD, making it one of the longest and most influential Islamic dynasties. For most of its early history, it was the largest empire in the world, and this meant that it had contact with distant neighbors such as the Chinese and Indians in the East, and the Byzantines in the West, allowing it to adopt and synthesize ideas from these cultures. The Abbasid Revolution The Abbasid Dynasty overthrew the preceding Umayyad Dynasty, which was based in Damascus, Syria. The Umayyads had become increasingly unpopular, especially in the eastern territories of the caliphate. The Umayyads favored Syrian Arabs over other Muslims and treated mawali, newly converted Muslims, as second- class citizens. The most numerous group of mawali were the Persians, who lived side- by-side with Arabs in the east who were angry at the favor shown to Syrian Arabs. Together, they were ripe for rebellion. Other Muslims were angry with the Umayyads for turning the caliphate into a hereditary dynasty. Some believed that a single family should not hold power, while Shiites believed that true authority belonged to the family of the Prophet Muhammad through his son-in-law Ali, and the Umayyads were not part of Muhammad’s family. All these various groups who were angry with the Umayyads united under the Abbasids, who began a rebellion against the Umayyads in Persia. The Abbasids built a coalition of Persian mawali, Eastern Arabs, and Shiites.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline Lecture Seven—The Abbasid Empire and Sectarian Divides Within Islam
    Outline Lecture Seven—The Abbasid Empire and Sectarian Divides within Islam Key Question today: 1. How did the Abbasids’ cosmopolitan ambition as an imperial power reflect the need to accommodate the increasing diversity within the Islam? 2. What were the key sectarian splits in Islam and how did they evolve? 3. How were theological debates expressions of social, ethnic, and class tensions? I) From Arab Kingdom to Islamic Empire a) Features of the Umayyad Caliphate b) Challenge from the East i) The impact of propaganda and social instigators (1) E.g. Abu Muslim, a Persian convert c) Who were the Abbasids? i) Founder of the Abbasid line, al-Mansur ii) Presented Abbasid line as a movement to restore the integrity of Islam iii) Using religion to gain legitimacy—Caesaropapism d) Abbasid Caliphate (750-1258) i) Changes brought about by Abbasids (1) Socially—Ended exclusive dominance of the Arab military aristocracy (2) Culturally—Shift center of gravity to the east, Persian heritage (a) Shift of capital from Damascus to Baghdad “Madinat al-Salam” (3) Politically— Centralized autocracy (a) Adoption of the Persian tradition of the “benevolent despot” (i) Al-Farabi on the role of the khalifa: (4) Militarily—Supported by professional soldiers ii) Overall, still relied on the foundations of Arabization and Islamization II) The Many “Traditions” of Islam a) Speaking of Islam in the plural—i.e. diverse “currents” in the faith i) Class disparities, ethnic conflicts, and regional differences often found expression in religious terms b) The Kharijite Movement—“Egalitarian anarchists” i) Emphasis that leadership should be based on merit and piety, not lineage ii) An ideal khalifa’s ultimate responsibility was towards the umma iii) E.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jalayirids Dynastic State Formation in the Mongol Middle East
    THE JALAYIRIDS DYNASTIC STATE FORMATION IN THE MONGOL MIDDLE EAST 1 PATRICK WING THE JALAYIRIDS The Royal Asiatic Society was founded in 1823 ‘for the investigation of subjects connected with, and for the encouragement of science, literature and the arts in relation to Asia’. Informed by these goals, the policy of the Society’s Editorial Board is to make available in appropriate formats the results of original research in the humanities and social sciences having to do with Asia, defined in the broadest geographical and cultural sense and up to the present day. The Monograph Board Professor Francis Robinson CBE, Royal Holloway, University of London (Chair) Professor Tim Barrett, SOAS, University of London Dr Evrim Binbas¸, Royal Holloway, University of London Dr Barbara M. C. Brend Professor Anna Contadini, SOAS, University of London Professor Michael Feener, National University of Singapore Dr Gordon Johnson, University of Cambridge Dr Rosie Llewellyn Jones MBE Professor David Morgan, University of Wisconsin- Madison Professor Rosalind O’Hanlon, University of Oxford Dr Alison Ohta, Director, Royal Asiatic Society For a full list of publications by the Royal Asiatic Society see www.royalasiaticsociety.org THE JALAYIRIDS DYNASTIC STATE FORMATION IN THE MONGOL MIDDLE EAST 2 Patrick Wing For E. L., E. L. and E. G. © Patrick Wing, 2016 Edinburgh University Press Ltd The Tun – Holyrood Road 12 (2f) Jackson’s Entry Edinburgh EH8 8PJ www.euppublishing.com Typeset in 11 /13 JaghbUni Regular by Servis Filmsetting Ltd, Stockport, Cheshire and printed and bound in Great Britain by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon CR0 4YY A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 1 4744 0225 5 (hardback) ISBN 978 1 4744 0226 2 (webready PDF) ISBN 978 1 4744 1093 9 (epub) The right of Patrick Wing to be identified as author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 and the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003 (SI No.
    [Show full text]
  • Caliph Al-Mansur and Hulagu Khan an Analysis of Their Political Strategies in the Light of Machiavellianism
    CALIPH AL-MANSUR AND HULAGU KHAN AN ANALYSIS OF THEIR POLITICAL STRATEGIES IN THE LIGHT OF MACHIAVELLIANISM BY SAYMA AAMAL SIDDIQ A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Human Sciences in History and Civilization Kulliyyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences International Islamic University Malaysia SEPTEMBER 2016 ABSTRACT This research discusses life and careers of the Mongol Khan Hulagu and the Abbasid Caliph Mansur in the light of the Machiavellian leadership theory. It aims to explore whether Machiavellianism is a necessary attribute in ensuring an undisputed rule or dominion. Although Machiavelli’s advocacy of ruthlessness and deception promises a successful, unchallenged reign, it largely ignores the psychological aspect as well as the repercussions of suppressing the spiritual self. With reference to al-Mansur, who epitomized the Machiavellian prince, it can be deduced that this eventually leads to psychological trauma, as a result of guilt and fear of retribution, casting a shadow on one’s political success. Thus, this questions the adequacy of The Prince as a practical philosophy, and shifts attention to the all-encompassing nature of Islam which secures political stability and success, without having to sacrifice moral consciousness. Hulagu, whose mission was to restore peace and justice (along with securing Mongol dominion) in the troubled lands of Persia and Iraq, leaned more towards Islamic principles than Machiavellianism in conducting his conquests. Though Hulagu’s career eventually faltered as a result of military defeats, the foundations laid by him contributed to the prosperity of the Ilkhanid Dynasty, which only came to an end due to biological (not political) causes as the last Ilkhan died childless.
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution of Persians to Islam During the Abbasid Period (750 - 1258 A.D.) : a Critical Study
    ■ I CONTRIBUTION OF PERSIANS TO ISLAM DURING THE ABBASID PERIOD (750 - 1258 A.D.) : A CRITICAL STUDY , • X ! THESIS SUBMITTED TO GAUHATI UNIVERSITY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY SUPERVISOR DR.MAZHAR ASIF BY ABDUL KHALIQUE LASKAR 2009 CONTRIBUTION OF PERSIANS TO ISI A vi DURING THE ABBASID PERIOD (750 - 1258 \ I : A CRITICAL STUDY THESIS SUBMITTED TO GAUHATI UNIVERSITY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE FACULTY OF ARTS SUPERVISOR DR.MAZHAR ASIF BY ABDUL KHALIQUE LASKAR 2009 ProQuest Number: 10105759 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ProQuest 10105759 Published by ProQuest LLC (2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346 DEPARTMENT OF PERSIAN GAUHATI UNIVERSITY i v-° -' Gopinath Bardoloi Nagar, Guwahati - 781 014 Assam Residence : Qr. No. 72-B )r. Mazhar Asif. M.A.<jNU),Ph.D.(jNui Gauhati University Campus leader. G uw ahati -781 014 )eptt. of Persian « : 0 3 6 1 - 2 6 7 2 6 8 3 94351-18077 e f . N o . Date 3 1 . 0 8 . 0 9 CERTIFICATE C ertified that this thesis entitled C ontribution o f P ersians to Islam during the A bbasid P eriod (750-1258 A .D ): A C ritical Study subm itted by A bdul K halique Laskar, Lecturer in Persian , M adhab Chandra D as College, Sonaim ukh, Sonai, C achar, A ssam , em bodies the results o f his original w ork and personal investigation, carried out under m y direct supervision and guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Bentleynziegleronmongols10pg.Pdf
    peoples embarked on new campaigns of expansion that eventually brought most of 1055 Tughril Beg named sultan India, much of central Asia, all of Anato- 1071 Battle of Manzikert |: lia, and a good portion of eastern Europe 1206-1227 Reign of Chinggis Khan I under their domination. 1211-1234 Mongol conquest of northern China The military campaigns of nomadic I peoples were sometimes exceedingly de- 1219-1221 Mongol conquest of Persia ! structive. Nomadic warriors demolished 1237-1241 Mongol conquest of Russia cities, slaughtered urban populations, and 1258 Mongol capture of Baghdad ravaged surrounding agricultural lands. 1264-1279 Mongol conquest of southern China Yet those same forces also encouraged systematic peaceful interaction between 1264-1294 Reign of Khubilai Khan peoples of different societies. Between 1279-1368 Yuan dynasty the eleventh and fifteenth centuries, the 1295 Conversion of llkhan Ghazan to Islam imperial campaigns of Turkish and Mon­ gol peoples forged closer links than ever 1336-1405 Life of Tamerlane before between Eurasian lands. By fos- 1453 Ottoman capture of Constantinople i tering cross-cultural communication and exchange on an unprecedented scale, the Chinese dynasty replaced the Mongol state in China, the Mon­ nomadic empires integrated the lives of peoples throughout gols continued to threaten its central Asian frontier. Moreover, much of the eastern hemisphere. from the fourteenth through the seventeenth century, Turkish Jerry H. Bentley, Herbert, F. Ziegler, Heather E. Streets-Salter, Tradition and Encounters: A Brief Global History, Vol. 1 (3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2014). TURKISH MIGRATIONS AND Nomadic Peoples and Their Animals Nomadic peo­ ples drove their herds and flocks to lands with abundant IMPERIAL EXPANSION grass and then moved them along as the animals thinned Turkish peoples never formed a single, homogeneous group the vegetation.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences Religious Politics
    Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 8(13) October 2014, Pages: 39-45 AENSI Journals Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences ISSN:1995-0772 EISSN: 1998-1090 Journal home page: www.aensiweb.com/ANAS Religious politics of Sultan Mahmoud Qaznavi Azar Jalilian Lecture, Department of History, Payame Noor Univercity, IR. Iran. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: One of the most important aspects of the reign of Sultan Mahmoud Qaznavi is the Received 10 September 2014 religious politics of him. Religion was one of the most important devices which sultan Received in revised form Mahmoud used and justifies his actions and martial movements. On one hand, sultan 23 October 2014 Mahmoud used religion and maintained his dominance by suppressing the internal Accepted 15 November 2014 oppositions and one the other hand, used it to have relationship with Abbasid reign and Available online 20 November 2014 attracting the satisfaction of Caliphate and obtaining religious and political legitimation. The present study tries to investigate the way of facing of Sultan Mahmoud with Keywords: religious groups and how he used religion to get his goals. Mahmoud Qaznavi, Alghader Caliphate Abbasi, Islamic religion, Sumentat, Taherti, political religion. © 2014 AENSI Publisher All rights reserved. To Cite This Article: Azar Jalilian, Religious politics of Sultan Mahmoud Qaznavi. Adv. in Nat. Appl. Sci., 8(13): 39-45, 2014 INTRODUCTION Religion is one of the most important and basic elements of political affairs of Iran especially in the history of after Islam. Some of the authorities used religion with their wisdom in order to get their goals. Qaznavi and Saljoughis used the religious place of Abbasids authorities for improving the political and martial goals of them.
    [Show full text]