4S/EASST Barcelona 2016

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

4S/EASST Barcelona 2016 4S/EASST Barcelona 2016 Science & technology by other means: Exploring collectives, spaces and futures August 31-September 3, CCIB #4sEASST2016 EASST / 4S 2016 Presidents’ Message Us donem la benvinguda a Barcelona! ¡Os damos la bienvenida a Barcelona! It is our great pleasure to open the program for the EASST/4S 2016 conference, exploring the multiple places and possibilities for enacting ‘Science + technology by other means’. Every four years, beginning in 1984 in Ghent, Belgium, the European Association for Science and Technology Studies (EASST) and the Society for Social Studies of Science (4S) have held joint conferences. We see the relationship between EASST and 4S as that of complementary sister societies, and welcome the opportunity to deepen and expand that relationship through these confluences of our membership. This year, thanks to the extraordinary efforts of a collective of colleagues within the Spanish STS network, we come together in Barcelona to enjoy both intellectual and cultural replenishment at the EASST/4S Conference BCN 2016. We are particularly grateful to the sts2016bcn organizing and scientific committees, who have worked with tremendous commitment and care to accommodate as many STS scholars as possible within the limits of even the spacious Centre de Convencions Internacional de Barcelona. As interest in STS continues to grow, this conference saw an overwhelming response to the call, with over 2500 abstracts submitted. While this is a good problem to have, it is a real one as it implies that not all of those who wish to participate can be included, however creatively the organizers approach the challenge of expanding space and time. Thanks to the organizers’ commitment to maximize inclusion, the program for the next four days reflects the depth and range of scholarship and activism within the multiple fields that comprise STS. There will be little here of business as usual in terms of the discourses and practices of science and technology, and much in the way of critical and inventive heterodoxy. Organized under the banner of ‘collectives, spaces, and futures,’ the conference aims to expand the range of associations, locations and possibilities that comprise STS, as well as its modes of engagement. The conference closes on Saturday with the Presidential Awards Plenary (Saturday September 3 from 18:00 – 19:30), in which our two societies have the opportunity to recognize those colleagues who have made significant contributions to the field of STS. As the number of our joint awards is large, we have worked to develop a format for the plenary that is both celebratory and substantive and that invites the recipients not only to enjoy the community’s recognition of their own outstanding work, but also to engage with each other in conversation. This session will also provide us all with an opportunity to express our gratitude to those whose labours have brought this conference into being. The result is what we are confident will be a lively and inspiring session, reminding us of the reasons that participation in the field of science and technology studies matters to us so much. Fred Steward, President, EASST and Lucy Suchman, President, 4S EASST / 4S 2016 Welcome by the Organizing Committee The local committee welcomes you to the joint 2016 4S/EASST conference. We are very happy to see you all in Barcelona. It has been a long and hard path since we decided to accept the kind invitation from 4S and EASST to organize their 2016 joint conference. We knew it was going to be daring, and we would be lying if we said we were not worried about the work that it could imply.Thus, we accepted the invitation as a challenge: to organize the most inclusive big conference possible in the South of Europe in a period of austerity, precarity, and limited institutional support. All the decisions we have made have sought to achieve this aim. First, the very motto of the conference is a desire to be inclusive. We wish to explore collectively the ways in which science and technology are increasingly performed ‘by other means’, in a variety of exploratory activities that include the articulation of collectives that do not fit with the traditional actors in science and technology, or in ways that problematize the established value systems involved in the production of knowledge and technologies. During these days we invite you to meet people producing knowledge outside the mainstream institutions, people doing research in very precarious ways or even having to leave their countries in order to keep their engagement with science and technology. We have tried to make this conference as porous in its boundaries as possible: including invited speakers from other fields and contexts and working to generate workshops and encounters with activists, artists and other scholars beyond the walls of the conference venue. In addition, we implemented all possible measures to accept as many papers as possible from the more than 2500 proposals received. After a long and complex process, with the inestimable work of convenors, we have been able to allocate 1746 papers (much more than those initially foreseen) in 109 open tracks and 90 closed sessions (plus sessions off conference, prizes and several presentations). With almost 2000 registered participants, this is the largest EASST/4S joint conference ever. Finally, we have tried to be loyal to an ethics of care in our relation with each and every one of those who have expressed interest in taking part in this conference: from encouraging a caring evaluation of papers to a careful attention to all of the practicalities and requests. We cannot finish this welcome without expressing our warmest thanks for the support received from both the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. Their help has made our work much easier. We hope you will engage in listening to amazing presentations, sharing your research and ideas, creating fruitful networks and, of course, enjoying the city! Organizing Local Committee: Nerea Calvillo, Miquel Domènech, Daniel López, Vincenzo Pavone, Israel Rodríguez‐Giralt, Carmen Romero‐Bachiller, Tomás Sánchez Criado, Francisco Tirado. EASST / 4S 2016 Conference Secretary: Miriam Arenas, Rocío Thovar Scientific Committee: Eduard Aibar, Attila Bruni, Daniel Breslau, Ana Delgado, Ana Delicado, Adolfo Estalella, Pierre‐Benoit Joly, Francesca Musiani, Tani Pérez Bustos, Eulalia Pérez Sedeño, Carmen Romero‐Bachiller, Estrid Sorensen, Lucy Suchman, Francisco Tirado, Manuel Tironi. Science & Technology by other Means: Collectives, Spaces and Futures Some decades ago STS scholars proposed that science and technology could be considered as ‘politics by other means’. Many years have gone by, and STS researchers are turning their attention towards proposals and experiences where science and technology are increasingly performed ‘by other means’ in a variety of exploratory activities. These include the articulation of collectives that do not fit with the traditional actors in science and technology, or who work in ways that problematize the established value systems involved in the production of knowledge and technologies, e.g. fostering the creation of open science, DIY design and commons‐based p2p projects, citizen science and maker communities, feminist and environmentalist technoscience projects, and many other platforms seeking to create alternatives to public/private technoscientific arrangements. Emerging science and technology practices show how public and private actors are being re‐assembled along routes that do not follow once established divides: science and technology are increasingly produced by private not‐for‐profit actors, such as CSOs, patient organizations and new citizens’ collectives. At the same time, traditional public institutions once entrusted with the mission of ‘producing’ science and technology for the common good, like universities and research centers, are being transformed into for‐ profit organizations subjected to productivity bonuses, austerity measures and new public management accounting principles. These emerging and consolidating phenomena destabilise and re‐signify existing public and private spaces, whilst generating new ones. In turn, new technoscientific communities and unexpected political mobilizations are continually opening up, engendering other contested options, as well as forging routes to explore more democratic and hospitable futures in times of care, housing, food, financial and environmental crisis. The joint 2016 4S/EASST conference in Barcelona is an opportunity to share reflections, ideas, findings and projects on a variety of aspects characterizing these alternative ways to do science and technology: (a) such as the fact that all of these transformations usually take place in blurred everyday spaces and not in those enclosed established spaces for science and technology development, such as laboratories or industrial R&D departments; (b) or, in a similar way, the fact that research and innovation processes are EASST / 4S 2016 increasingly organised in networked, horizontal assemblages where the traditional hierarchies in science are put into question and where science and technology are being co‐produced by different actors in different, sometimes antagonistic, ways; (c) and, finally, the fact that traditional boundaries between the public and the private are no longer confined to state and for‐profit actors, care practices taking a preeminent presence in most of these everyday situations. We
Recommended publications
  • Global Reach – Graduate Exchange
    Schulich School of Business GRADUATE EXCHANGE Global Reach. Megan Kates (IMBA ‘15) ESSEC Business School, France THE SCHULICH GRADUATE Finland EXCHANGE NETWORK Norway Denmark United Netherlands Kingdom Germany France Hungary Austria Yo ur Italy USA Spain Turkey Japan China South Korea Israel Taiwan passport Mexico India Thailand Philippines Venezuela to the Singapore Brazil Peru world. Australia South Africa Chile Argentina “My exchange semester was one of the most incredible and defining experiences of my life. It gave me a chance to broaden my perspectives both academically and personally.” JUDY PATLA (MBA ‘15) PARTNER COUNTRIES 54 SCHOOLS 30 WORLDWIDE ARGENTINA FINLAND • IAE Business School, • Aalto University School of Business, Universidad Austral, Buenos Aires Helsinki AUSTRALIA FRANCE • Melbourne Business School, • ESSEC Business School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne Cergy Pontoise • Australian Graduate School of • EMLYON Business School, Lyon Management (AGSM), University of • HEC Paris, Paris New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney • IAE Aix-Marseille Graduate School of Management, Aix-Marseille AUSTRIA University, Puyricard • Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien – Vienna University of Economics GERMANY and Business (WU), Vienna • WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management, Düsseldorf BRAZIL • University of Mannheim Business • Fundação Getulio Vargas – Escola School, Mannheim de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (FGV-EAESP), São Paulo HUNGARY • CEU Business School, Central CHILE European University, Budapest • Pontificia Universidad Católica
    [Show full text]
  • Manager À L’Heure Des Recompositions Coordination Territoriales Laurent Rieutort
    Manager à l’heure des recompositions Coordination territoriales Laurent Rieutort Qu’ils soient administratifs ou issus de projets, les territoires se recomposent rapidement et l’action publique tente de réduire les disparités en favorisant un développement harmonieux et équilibré. Toutes les formes spatiales (de l’hyper-ruralité aux métropoles) et Manager toutes les échelles (de la commune à l’Union européenne) sont concernées en France. Cet ouvrage fait le point sur le repositionnement des trois fonctions à l’heure des publiques (État, territoriale, hospitalière) face aux transitions terri- toriales. Quels sont les effets en termes de pilotage, de manage- ment territorial et de formation ? Comment agir dans le champ de Laurent Rieutort (coord.) l’ingénierie territoriale en étant facilitateur ou même coordonna- • recompositions teur ? Il s’agit ici d’appréhender les méthodes et savoir-faire qui favorisent l’innovation et la co-construction et permettent l’adap- tation au changement. Les études de cas, éclairages et mises en perspectives abordent des questions aussi variées que les terri- territoriales toires de santé, les fractures sociales et territoriales, la transition écologique, la convergence avec les politiques européennes ou le renforcement de la décentralisation. Des chercheurs et praticiens, issus des différents secteurs de la fonction publique, ouvrent des pistes concrètes aux acteurs publics pour mettre en place de nouvelles stratégies de régénération des territoires. Coordination Ce livre a été conçu et coordonné par Laurent Rieutort, agrégé de Laurent Rieutort géographie, professeur à l’université Clermont-Auvergne et direc- teur de l’Institut d’Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes du développement des serviceprofession cadre public territoires.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. List of Active Partners by Country
    The University of Victoria holds 288 agreements with 224 partnership institutions and organizations based in 54 countries as of September 2020. This document includes: List of active partners by country Partners by region and agreement type 1. List of Active Partners by Country Australia Australian National University Deakin University Griffith University James Cook University Macquarie University Murdoch University Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University of Adelaide University of New South Wales University of Newcastle University of South Australia University of Sydney University of Wollongong Austria FH JOANNEUM - University of Applied Sciences Johannes-Kepler-Universität Linz Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien Belgium L'institut Superieur de Traducteurs et Interpretes de la Haute Ecole de Bruxelles (ISTI), - Université Libre de Bruxelles Louvain School of Management Thomas More Mechelen-Antwerpen Bhutan Jigme Singye Wangchuck School of Law Page 1 Updated Sept 2020 Brazil Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Fundação Getulio Vargas - Escola de Administracão de Empresas de São Paulo Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro Universidade de São Paulo Universidade Estadual Paulista 'Júlio de Mesquita Filho' (UNESP) Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Canada Camosun College IC-IMPACTS Canada-India Research Centre of Excellence Université de Montréal University of Ottawa University of Waterloo Chile Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez Universidad del Desarrollo China Beihang
    [Show full text]
  • Communiqués De Presse
    Communiqués de presse École Centrale de Lyon Archives année 2016 Communiqué de presse Lyon, le 2 février 2016 Université de Lyon : création de l’Alliance des Écoles d’Ingénieurs de Lyon Saint-Étienne (AEILyS) Ce 2 février 2016, les Écoles d’ingénieurs de l’Université de Lyon se mobilisent La dynamique menée par l’Université de Lyon - Communauté d’Universités et d’établissements (COMUE) et le dépôt le 22 décembre dernier du dossier IDEX, appellent l’ensemble des Écoles d’ingénieurs du site de Lyon-Saint Etienne à se rassembler pour être pleinement acteurs de ces transformations au sein de l’Université de Lyon. Une Alliance aux objectifs fédérateurs Le saviez-vous ? Les 16 Écoles d'ingénieurs de Lyon-Saint Étienne, L’Université de Lyon, grâce à ses écoles d’ingénieurs, habilitées par la commission des titres d’ingénieurs, représente le 1er site français pour la membres, associées ou non de l’UdL - Institut National formation d’ingénieurs. des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (INSA Lyon), École nationale supérieure des Mines de Saint-Etienne, École Centrale de Nombre total d’élèves ingénieurs : 14 870 Nombre total d’alternants : 2158 Lyon, Télécom Saint-Etienne, École Catholique d’Arts et Nombre d’enseignants et d’enseignants-chercheurs : Métiers (ECAM Lyon), École nationale des travaux publics de 1554 l'Etat (ENTPE), École supérieure de chimie physique Nombre de diplômes d’ingénieurs par an (grade de électronique de Lyon (CPE Lyon), Institut supérieur d'agriculture masters) : 3856 et d'agroalimentaire Rhône-Alpes (ISARA Lyon), Vetagro Sup, Nombre
    [Show full text]
  • Raising & Mapping Awareness of the Global Goals
    RAISING & MAPPING AWARENESS OF THE GLOBAL GOALS 2020 UPDATE Report from Sulitest, Tangible implementation of the HESI & Contributor to United Nations virtual edition the review of the 2030 Agenda July 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Call from UN DESA ……………………………….........……..………………………………..... 3 Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………….….……... 4 The Sulitest Initiative How Sulitest Connects to the SDGs and Higher Education..............…... 7 Vision, Mission and Phases of Development..................................……... 9 A Test Session: How Does It Work?...............................................…….... 11 Gamification....................................................................................…...... 17 Reverse Pedagogy Interface ................................................................... 18 Other Tools Available with Premium Access..................................…...... 20 Research, Robustness and Community Engagement....................…...... 22 Complementarity and Interconnectivity with Other Platforms......……... 26 Trends Indicators and Trends: July 2019-June 2020.................................…….... 28 Mapping Sustainability Awareness on the Scope of the 17 SDGs....….... 29 SDG Modules in partnership with UN entities...........................………….. 33 Voluntary Survey.....................….......................................................….... 36 SULITestimonials ...................................................................................……... 42 References ...................................................................................……............
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 GLOBAL MBA RANKINGS He Benefits Attached to an MBA Weighting of Data Points (Full-Time and Part-Time MBA)
    2020 GLOBAL MBA RANKINGS he benefits attached to an MBA Weighting of Data Points (full-time and part-time MBA) are well documented: career Quality of Faculty: 34.95 % progression, networking International Diversity: 9.71% opportunities, personal Tdevelopment, salary... and the list Class Size: 9.71% goes on. However, in an increasingly Accreditation: 8.74% congested market, selecting the right Faculty business school can be difficult, which to Student Ratio: 7.76% is far from ideal given the time and Price: 5.83% investment involved. International Exposure: 4.85% Using a ranking system entirely geared and weighted to fact-based Work Experience: 4.85% *EMBA Weighting: Professional Work experience and criteria, CEO Magazine aims to cut Development: 4.85% international diversity are through the noise and provide potential adjusted accordingly. Gender Parity: 4.85% students with a performance benchmark **Online MBA Weighting: Delivery methods: 3.8% for those schools under review. Delivery mode and class 0 % 5 % 10 % 15 % 20 % 25 % 30 % 35 % size are removed. GLOBAL MBA RANKINGS TIER ONE Business School Country Business School Country AIX Marseille Graduate School of Management Monaco Emlyon Business School France American University: Kogod North America ESADE Business School Spain Appalachian State University* North America EU Business School Germany, Spain Ashland University North America and Switzerland Aston Business School UK Florida International University North America Auburn University: Harbert North America Fordham University North
    [Show full text]
  • Veronika Czellar, Phd Professor – Speciality : Data Science, Financial Econometrics
    Veronika Czellar, PhD Professor – Speciality : Data Science, Financial Econometrics Phone : +33 (0)3 20 15 45 00 Fax : +33 (0)3 20 15 45 01 E-mail : [email protected] EDUCATION 09/2006 PhD in Econometrics and Statistics University of Geneva Title: “Small Sample Properties of Indirect Inference with Applications to Stochastic Differential Equations”. Supervisor: Prof. Elvezio Ronchetti 09/2002 Master’s degree in Econometrics University of Geneva 07/2000 Bachelor’s degree in Mathematics, minor in Economics and Finance University of Geneva 1988-1996 Secondary and highschool education in Russia, Finland and Switzerland ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS AND VISITING POSITIONS 09/2015- Professor, Dept. of Accounting, Law, Finance and Economics EDHEC Business School 04/15-08/15 Associate Professor, Dept. of Economics, Finance and Control EMLYON Business School 09/13-04/15 Assistant Professor, Dept. of Economics, Finance and Control EMLYON Business School 09/07-09/13 Assistant Professor, Dept. of Economics and Decision Sciences HEC Paris 01/08-03/08 Visiting Scholar, Dept. of Economics University of Washington 10/06-09/07 Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Statistics University of Washington 09/03-03/04 Visiting Scholar, Dept. of Finance Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University Veronika Czellar, PhD, Professor of Econometrics, EDHEC Business School 09/00-07/06 Teaching Assistant, Dept. of Econometrics University of Geneva TEACHING 2018-present R for Finance, MSc in Financial Markets, EDHEC 2020-present Data Analytics with R, Master in Management,
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Nominations Et Créations Emlyon Business School Poursuit Le
    Nominations et créations emlyon business school poursuit le renouvellement de son équipe de direction pour accélérer le déploiement de la stratégie du groupe early makers. À partir du 1er décembre, Nicolas Péjout rejoint l’École comme directeur de la stratégie et du développement ; à ce titre, il sera membre du Directoire. Nicolas Péjout exerce des fonctions de direction depuis près de 10 ans dans l’ESR : directeur de la vie universitaire à Sciences Po de 2011 à 2013, il en dirige ensuite l’executive education de 2013 à 2018 ; il rejoint ensuite l’Université Paris Dauphine – PSL en qualité de directeur général des services. Florence Dufour, directrice générale de l’EBI et Jean-Christophe Hauguel, directeur général d’ISC Paris ont été élus membres du Bureau de l’UGEI lors du CA tenu le 15 octobre 2020. Leur mandat prendra effet au 16 octobre 2020 pour une durée de 15 mois et demi. Le CA de l’Institut Agro, s’est prononcé le 15 octobre 2020 sur les deux candidatures au poste de directrice du nouvel établissement, issu de la fusion d’AgroCampus Ouest et de Montpellier SupAgro. Anne-Lucie Wack, l’actuelle administratrice provisoire, a recueilli 18 votes favorables, 13 défavorables et 1 abstention. Valérie Baduel, en charge de l’ESR à la DGER du ministère de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation, a recueilli quant à elle 16 votes favorables, 14 défavorables et 2 abstentions. Ces avis seront transmis au ministère de l’Agriculture pour nomination par décret pour un mandat de 5 ans renouvelable une fois. Aurélie Heuga reprend la direction des relations institutionnelles et média de Kedge BS en remplacement de Julien Ravier devenu député des Bouches-du-Rhône le 7 octobre et bénéficiant du congé pour mandat parlementaire.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Rapport Annuel 2019 De L'école Est Disponible
    TITRE DESSUS RAPPORT ANNUEL 2019 1 2 l’organigramme de l’École a été revu et stabilisé. Enfin, la mise en place d’un Plan annuel de perfor- mance permet de décliner, de façon beaucoup plus transparente, la stratégie de l’école dans chacune de ses directions, et de mesurer l’évolution de sa performance. Dans ce contexte, l’École a également ÉDITO consolidé une situation financière que la fusion Centrale-Supélec avait fragilisée. En ce qui concerne la formation d’ingénieurs, la ROMAIN deuxième année du cursus unifié a été finalisée et SOUBEYRAN mise en place à la rentrée de septembre. En pre- Directeur Général mière année, l’effectif de la promotion a crû de plus de CentraleSupélec de 10% pour atteindre 915 élèves. Tout en gardant un niveau d’exigence constant sur la qualité des élèves, la majorité des places créées a été pourvue hors des viviers traditionnels de recrutement de l’École dans une volonté de diversification des pro- motions. Offrant un cadre d’étude particulièrement adapté, les campus de Rennes et de Metz accueillent ainsi chacun une classe de formation en apprentissage. Cette ouverture, marque de l’École, sera encore accentuée dans les années qui viennent. Historiquement très importante, l’ouverture de l’École à l’international s’est traduite en 2019 notamment par l’organisation, simultanée pour la 2019 restera comme une année charnière majeure première fois, des assemblées générales des dans la vie de l’École, en premier lieu en concréti- réseaux T.I.M.E. et CESAER. Provenant de 33 pays, sant l’Université Paris-Saclay.
    [Show full text]
  • Lafrancecraintunepénuried’Ingénieurs Seulement4%Desdiplôméssontauchômage.Laformationd’Untiersdeprofessionnelsenplusestendébat
    8 universités & grandes écoles 0123 Jeudi 28 novembre 2013 LaFrancecraintunepénuried’ingénieurs Seulement4%desdiplôméssontauchômage.Laformationd’untiersdeprofessionnelsenplusestendébat a Conférence des directeurs «les plus fortes difficultés de recru- des écoles françaises d’ingé- tement». L nieurs (CDEFI) joue les Cas- La France manque donc bien sandre: le pays devrait former d’ingénieurs? «Tout dépend de environ10000 ingénieursde plus quelle période on parle», précise par an s’il ne veut pas hypothé- Philippe Massé, président de la quer son avenir économique. «Ce Commission des titres d’ingé- constat découle d’une observation nieur (CTI). Selon lui, il n’y a pas de terrain», explique le président aujourd’hui de pénurie générali- de la CDEFI, Christian Lerminiaux. sée. «Dansuncontextedecriseéco- «Nous devrions en former 40000 nomique , l’adéquation est remar- par an , dit-il, contre33000 aujour- quable entre le nombre de diplô- d’hui. Certes, ils n’étaient que més et le nombre de postes offerts. 18000ilyadouzeans.Lacohortea Les 33000néo-ingénieurs de 2013 bien augmenté. Mais, aujourd’hui, elle stagne.» Médecine, Ce discours rencontre un accueil compréhensif auprès des cinéma,assurances… ministres de droite ou de gauche Partoutlatechnique qui se succèdent Rue Descartes. Geneviève Fioraso en est convain- s’insinue cue: «Ingénieur est le deuxième métier de cadre en tension derrière ont trouvé du travail en moins de médecin», dit-elle. trois mois, un délai incompressi- Laurent Wauquiez, qui a occu- ble.» Il en résulte un taux de chô- pé la place à la fin du gouverne- magestupéfiant:4%,voire2,8%si ment Fillon, déclarait aux écoles: l’on retranche les jeunes en quête «Ce pays a besoin d’ingénieurs, et de leur premier emploi.
    [Show full text]
  • Oulu Business School Erasmus Destinations for Academic Year
    Oulu Business School Erasmus Destinations for Academic Year 2020-21 ERASMUS Exchange institutional Country PLEASE NOTE! Places Accreditations program code Host institution A GRAZ01 University of Graz AT - Austria Erasmus+ 2 B LIEGE01 University of Liege BE - Belgium Erasmus+ 4 AACSB B LOUVAIN01 Louvain School of Management BE - Belgium Erasmus+ 1 CH BRUGG02 University of Applied Sciences NWS CH - Switzerland * *Switzerland pays the grant 2 CZ BRNO05 Masaryk University CZ - Czech Republic Erasmus+ 3 University of Economics, Prague CZ PRAHA09 (VSE) CZ - Czech Republic Erasmus+ 6 D AACHEN01 RWTH Aachen DE - Germany Erasmus+ 4 D FRANKFU01 Goethe University Frankfurt DE - Germany Erasmus+ 3 AACSB D KAISERS01 University of Kaiserslautern DE - Germany Erasmus+ 3 D KOBLENZ02 University of Koblenz DE - Germany Erasmus+ 1 D MUNCHEN02 Technical University of Munich DE - Germany Erasmus+ 5 D MUNSTER01 University of Münster DE - Germany Erasmus+ 4 D PASSAU01 The University of Passau DE - Germany Erasmus+ 4 D PFORZHE01 Pforzheim University DE - Germany Erasmus+ 3 AACSB D STUTTGA01 University of Stuttgart DE - Germany Erasmus+ 3 D TUBINGE01 University of Tübingen DE - Germany Erasmus+ 2 University of Southern Denmark, DK ODENSE01 Odense DK - Denmark Erasmus+ 2 E BARCELO16 The Ramon Llull University ES - Spain Erasmus+ 1 Comillas Pontifical University, Faculty of Economics and Business E MADRID02 Administration ES - Spain Erasmus+ New destination in Madrid! 3 E MADRID04 Autonomous University of Madrid ES - Spain Erasmus+ 2 E MADRID26 King Juan Carlos
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016
    Le Contrôleur général des lieux de privation de liberté Annual report 2016 1 2 Contents GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................................................. 9 CHAPTER 1 ................................................................................................................................................................ 15 PLACES OF DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY IN 2016 ........................................................................................................................... 15 CHAPTER 2 ................................................................................................................................................................ 37 THE REPORTS, OPINIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PUBLISHED IN 2016 ........................................................................................ 37 CHAPTER 3 ................................................................................................................................................................ 49 ACTIONS TAKEN IN 2016 IN RESPONSE TO GENERAL INSPECTION REPORTS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND OPINIONS .................................... 49 CHAPTER 4 ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]