DOCSLIB.ORG

The Eastern Origin of the Celtic Nations Proved by a Comparison of Their

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

-; pi lu n iillnli'l.I n/ 7' y : THE EASTERN ORIGIN CELTIC NATIONS PROVED BY A COMPABISON OF THEIK r>I^4^LECTS WITH TEE SANSKRIT, GREEK, LATIN, AND TEUTONIC LANGUAGES FORMING A SUPPLEMENT TO RESEARCHES INTO THE PHYSICAL HISTORY OF MANKIND. JAMES COWLES PRICHARD, M.D., F.R.S., ETC. EDITED BY R. G. LATHAM, M.A., M.D., F.R.S., LONDON: HOULSTON AT^D WRIGHT, 65, PATERXOSTER ROW AND BERI^ARD QUARITCH, ORIENTAL AND PHILOLOGICAL PUBLISHER, CASTLE STREET, LEICESTER SQUARE. 1857. STEPHEN AUSTIN, -4M PRIKTEH, HERTFOHD. THE REVEREND WILLIAM DANIEL CONYBEARE, A.M., F.R.S., ETC., EECTOE OF SULLY, PROFESSOR JACOB GRIMM, THE UNIVEESITY OF GOETTINGEN, THIS WOEK IS INSCEIBED, IN TESTIMONY OF THE HIGH RESPECT AND REGARD THE AUTHOR. ; EDITOH^S PREFACE. When the publisher of the present edition, after stating the extent to which Dr. Prichard's Eastern Origin of the Celtic Nations was a work which still kept np the interest and importance which it had at the time of its publication, added the request that I would undertake the Editorship of a reprint, the first question I asked was why he had preferred an investigator in general ethnology and philology to a special Keltic scholar, either Welsh or Irish remarking, at the same time, that there were many to be found who were, doubtless, both able and willing to undertake the required editorship ? Even if these were wanting, Sanskrit scholars, familiar with comparative philology, would be fitter editors than myself ; these being, at least, as abundant as the others ; and the Sanskrit language being, in the book itself, of equal prominence and importance with the Keltic. vi editor's preface. His answer was that this had been already con- sidered ; but that the decidedly ethnological cha- racter of the work had convinced him that a minute criticism of its details was less wanted than a broad of its principles, and leading statements view ; and that an investigator, who was neither Kelt nor Sanskiit, but general, was more likely to do justice to the work than a special scholar. I thought then, as I think now, that this view was sound, and undertook the responsibility of editing one of the most important contributions ever made to philological ethnography. A great deal of the Supplementary Chapter (pp. 65—159) was alread}^ written, the criticism of the so-called Keltic migrations having long been a matter upon which I had employed myself ; indeed, the publication of all the notices of ancient writers upon the ancient Kelts, with a body of ethnological notes, after the manner of my edition of the Germania of Tacitus, had, for some years, been contemplated by me. Again, the volume of Prichard is not merely an exposition of the reasons which induced the Author to make the Keltic tongues Indo-European, but a general explanation of the meaning of that term, founded upon a remarkably clear exposition of the ; editor's preface. Vll nature and relations of the languages which consti- tute the group. It is more than this. It is an excellent introduction to ethnology in general; inferior to no work on the same subject except Dr. Prichard's own larger ones. Over these even it has the advantage of brevity and conciseness. But that heavy objections (in the mind, at least, of the editor) lie against the ordinary doctrine suggested by the term Indo-European, may be seen in almost every page of the annotations. They lie, however, less against the work under notice than against current opinion in general. It is possible that this may be correct ; and, if so, my own views are exceptionable. I do not say that they are not so. I only say that, if the current views concerning what is called the Eastern origin of the so-called Indo-Europeans are correct, they are so by accident for they rest upon an amount of assumption flir greater than what the natiu'e of the question either requires or allows. It only remains to be added, that this edition of Dr. Prichard's 'Eastern Origin of the Celtic Nations,' is published with the special sanction of the proprietors of the copyright. ADVERTISEMENT. The treatise now laid before the public forms a Supplement to my Eesearclies into tlie Physical History of Mankind, and was announced in the first edition of that work, which was printed in 1813. Of the motives which induced me so long to withhold it, and of those which have at length determined me to the publication, a sufficient ac- count will be found in the Introduction ; and I have only a few words to premise on the circumstances and designation under which the work now appears. It is termed, a Supplement to Eesearches into the Physical History of Mankind, because it was undertaken with the view of furnishing proofs of a series of facts, of which little more could be intro- duced into that work than general statements, con- taining the results of inquiries which had been sufficient for my own conviction. It forms, how- ever, a distinct treatise, in exclusion of its reference X AD\'^ETISE]MENT. to the history of nations or races of men ; and it may be proper to remark that some of tlie philo- logical researches which it contains have been pur- sued into greater extent than the primary object of the work may seem to have required. If this is in one respect a fault, it may be hoped that contingent advantages in another point of view will be found to atone for it. The examination of cognate lan- guages, while it points out their resemblances, and proves the affinity of the races of men of which they formed the vernacular speech, seldom, fails at the same time to elucidate, in a greater or less degree the structure of the respective idioms them- if selves ; and it will appear, I am not mistaken, that the relation of the Celtic dialects to the other languages brought into comparison with them, fur- nishes the means of throwing some light on the Eiu'cpean idioms in general. I have followed the investigation which thus suggested itself, and have stated the results. If the latter are well established, they will be found both interesting by themselves to the philologist, and will, at the same time, strongly confirm tlie principal inferences obtained in respect to the origin and mutual affinity of the European nations. ADVERTISEMENT. As I have had occasion in several parts of this treatise to allude to the grammatical forms of some languages, with which I am but imperfectly ac- quainted, I have endeavoured to cite correctly the authorities on which I have depended for informa- tion. The names of various grammarians and other writers on philological subjects, with the designa- tions of their works, will be found in the marginal references [foot notes] scattered through the follow- ing pages, and need not be mentioned in this place. But there are four living authors to whom, in a more especial manner, I am indebted, and am anxious to acknowledge my obligation. These are Mr. II. H. Wilson, the learned secretary of the Asiatic Society, author of the Sanskrit dictionary, and Professors Bopp, Eosen, and Grimm, to whose well known works I have made, throughout this essay, frequent references. 3S^ — CONTENTS, INTRODUCTION. PAGE Sect. I. Different opinions respecting the population of the world Autochthones—Hypothesis of the ancients—Modern opinion—Way of investigating the subject—Physical evidence—Comparison of lan- guages—How far this inquiry has tended to elucidate the history of nations—General relations and value of philological inquiries 1 Notes 16 Sect. II. Nations of Europe at the earliest periods of history- Eastern origin of several of them proved by their languages—Indo- European languages—Is the Celtic allied to them ?—Denied by several writers—Motives for the discussion of this question 35 Notes 46 Sect. III. Of the Celtic dialects extant—Modes of orthography—Au- thorities S9 Notes 62 SUPPLEMENTARY CHAPTER. 2'he Keltic Nations of A^itiq^uity. Sect. I. The term Keltic—Galatse and Galli 65 Sect. II. Did any population other than Keltic bear that name, or one like it 69 XIV CONTEXTS. PAGE Sect. III. Ea^steru origin of the Kelts — How far real — How far necessary to the main question of the present treatise 72 Sect. IV. Cixjsar's notice of the Gauls 7S Sect. V. The Keltic area—Savoy and Switzerland—Helvetia 84 Sect. VI. The Keltic area—The Tyrol—Rhoctia 85 Sect. VII. StjTia and Carinthia 90 Sect. VIII. The Kelts of IlljTia 92 Sect. IX. Kelts of Dalmatia—The country of the lapodes 93 Sect. X. Kelts of the Lower Danube—Bastarnse—Galatsc ib. Sect. XI. Two classes of Galatse 98 Sect. XII. The Galatse of the Olbian Inscription 100 Sect. XIII. Kelts of Wurtemburg — Decumates Agri and Vin- delicia ib. Sect. XIV. Kelts of Bavaria—Vindelicia 101 Sect. XV. Kelts of Bohemia 102 Sect. XVI. The Gothini ib. Sect. XVII. Kelts of Thrace, Macedon, and Greece 103 Sect. XVIII. Kelts of Galatia 104 Sect. XIX. Kelts of Belgium, and the Lower and Middle Rhine 110 Sect. XX. The Ligurians 117 Sect. XXL The Kelts of the Spanish Peninsula 119 Sect. XXIL The Kelts of Italy 121 Sect.XXIIL TheBoii 133 Sect. XXIV, The Teutones and Cimbri 136 I. The Ambrones ib. IL The Tigurini 138 in. The Teutones ib. IV. The Cimbri 142 Sect. XXV. The Picts, eo Mo»w'«e 151 Sect. XXVI. On the Cruithneach 155 Sect. XXVII. The Lingua Britannia; Proprior of the Amber Coast 157 Sect.XXVIII.
Recommended publications
  • Map 15 Arelate-Massalia Compiled by S

    Map 15 Arelate-Massalia Compiled by S

    Map 15 Arelate-Massalia Compiled by S. Loseby, 1995 Introduction Map 15 Arelate–Massalia Map 16 Colonia Forum Iulii–Albingaunum All the French départements covered here were treated in the CAGR series, beginning with its first volume, Alpes-Maritimes, in 1931. Its successor CAG is far more comprehensive, although unfortunately both maps were compiled before publication of the relevant volumes. Some references to them are incorporated in the Directories, however. Provence and Languedoc have in recent years been among the most dynamic regions of France in archaeological terms. As well as the periodic entries in Gallia Informations, the archaeology of the region sustains a series of journals, notably the Revue Archéologique de Narbonnaise, Documents d’Archéologie Méridionale, Bulletin d’Archéologie de Provence, Archéologie en Languedoc,andRevue des Etudes Ligures/Rivista di Studi Liguri.A comprehensive, up-to-date overview of the ancient history and archaeology of the region is lacking (Rivet 1988 is the best single work available); Bromwich (1993) at least provides a basic guide to the principal Greek and Roman remains. Of the numerous sites known exclusively from archaeology, only those significant enough to have attracted at least an article-length study are marked. The whole span from early Greek engagement with the region (c. 600 B.C.) is covered, up until c. A.D. 500; locations mentioned only in works associated with Caesarius of Arles are therefore excluded. From Cap Couronne eastwards (see La Couronne, Map 15 E3), the Provençal coastline appears to be little altered since antiquity, while on the western side of Map 15 the evolution of the shores of Languedoc has largely been gradual and minor–involving the shifting and consolidation of the sandbars which now separate the coastal étangs (lagoons) from the sea, but which seem to have been less developed in antiquity.
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography

    The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography

    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
  • La Gaule Indépendante Et La Gaule Romaine

    La Gaule Indépendante Et La Gaule Romaine

    LA GAULE INDÉPENDANTE ET LA GAULE ROMAINE GUSTAVE BLOCH PARIS – 1900 TOME PREMIER DE L'HISTOIRE DE FRANCE DEPUIS LES ORIGINES JUSQU'À LA RÉVOLUTION, D'ERNEST LAVISSE PREMIÈRE PARTIE. — LES ORIGINES. - LA GAULE INDÉPENDANTE. - LA CONQUÊTE ROMAINE LIVRE PREMIER. — LES ORIGINES CHAPITRE PREMIER. — LES SOCIÉTÉS PRIMITIVES I. - L'âge de la pierre taillée — II . - L'âge de la pierre polie — III . - L'âge des métaux CHAPITRE II. — LES PEUPLES HISTORIQUES I. - Les Ibères et les Ligures — II . - Les Phéniciens et Marseille — III . - Les Celtes et leurs migrations — IV . - Les peuples de la Gaule LIVRE II. — LA GAULE INDÉPENDANTE ET LA CONQUÊTE ROMAINE CHAPITRE PREMIER. — LA GAULE INDÉPENDANTE I. - La civilisation — II . - La religion — III . - La religion (suite). Le sacerdoce druidique — IV . - Les institutions sociales et politiques — V. - Les luttes dans les cités et entre les cités CHAPITRE II. — LA CONQUÊTE ROMAINE I. - La conquête et l'organisation de la province transalpine (154-58 av. J.-C.) — II . - Les campagnes de César (58-50 av. J.-C.) — III . - Les caractères et les effets de la conquête — IV . - Les insurrections du premier siècle ap. J.-C. DEUXIÈME PARTIE. — LA GAULE ROMAINE LIVRE PREMIER. — LE GOUVERNEMENT DE LA GAULE AU Ier ET AU IIe SIÈCLES AP. J.-C. CHAPITRE PREMIER. — LE GOUVERNEMENT CENTRAL I. - La monarchie impériale — II . - Les circonscriptions provinciales — III . - Les circonscriptions provinciales (suite). La frontière germanique — IV . - Les gouverneurs des provinces. La justice — V. - L'impôt — VI . - Le service militaire. L'armée gallo- germanique CHAPITRE II. — LE GOUVERNEMENT LOCAL I. - La religion impériale et les assemblées provinciales — II . - Les états ou cités.
  • Was Galatian Really Celtic? Anthony Durham & Michael Goormachtigh First Published November 2011, Updated to October 2016

    Was Galatian Really Celtic? Anthony Durham & Michael Goormachtigh First Published November 2011, Updated to October 2016

    Was Galatian Really Celtic? Anthony Durham & Michael Goormachtigh first published November 2011, updated to October 2016 Summary Saint Jerome’s AD 386 remark that the language of ancient Galatia (around modern Ankara) resembled the language of the Treveri (around modern Trier) has been misinterpreted. The “Celts”, “Gauls” or “Galatians” mentioned by classical authors, including those who invaded Greece and Anatolia around 277 BC, were not Celtic in the modern sense of speaking a Celtic language related to Welsh and Irish, but tall, pale-skinned, hairy, warrior peoples from the north. The 150 or so words and proper names currently known from Galatian speech show little affinity with Celtic but more with Germanic. Introduction In AD 386 Saint Jerome wrote: Apart from the Greek language, which is spoken throughout the entire East, the Galatians have their own language, almost the same as the Treveri. For many people this short remark is the linchpin of a belief that ancient Celtic speech spread far outside its Atlantic-fringe homeland, reaching even into the heart of Anatolia, modern Turkey. However, we wish to challenge the idea that Galatians spoke a language that was Celtic in the modern sense of being closely related to Welsh or Irish. Galatia was the region around ancient Ancyra, modern Ankara, in the middle of Turkey. Anatolia (otherwise known as Asia Minor) has seen many civilisations come and go over the millennia. Around 8000 BC it was a cradle of agriculture and the Neolithic revolution. The whole family of Indo-European languages originated somewhere in that region. We favour the idea that they grew up around the Black Sea all the way from northern Anatolia, past the mouth of the river Danube, to southern Russia and Ukraine.
  • The Gallic War - Book Iii (56 Bc)

    The Gallic War - Book Iii (56 Bc)

    JULIUS CAESAR (GAIUS JULIUS CAESAR, 100-44 BC) THE GALLIC WAR - BOOK III (56 BC) TRANSLATED BY W.A. MCDEVITTE AND W.S. BOHN ________________________________________ DE BELLO GALLICO - LIBER TERTIUS § 3:1. When Caesar was setting out for Italy, he sent Servius Galba with the twelfth legion and part of the cavalry, against the Nantuates, the Veragri, and Seduni, who extend from the territories of the Allobroges, and the lake of Geneva, and the River Rhone to the top of the Alps. The reason for sending him was, that he desired that the pass along the Alps, through which [the Roman] merchants had been accustomed to travel with great danger, and under great imposts, should be opened. He permitted him, if he thought it necessary, to station the legion in these places, for the purpose of wintering. Galba having fought some successful battles and stormed several of their forts, upon embassadors being sent to him from all parts and hostages given and a peace concluded, determined to station two cohorts among the Nantuates, and to winter in person with the other cohorts of that legion in a village of the Veragri, which is called Octodurus; and this village being situated in a valley, with a small plain annexed to it, is bounded on all sides by very high mountains. As this village was divided into two parts by a river, he granted one part of it to the Gauls, and assigned the other, which had been left by them unoccupied, to the cohorts to winter in. He fortified this [latter] part with a rampart and a ditch.
  • THE GEOGRAPHY of GALATIA Gal 1:2; Act 18:23; 1 Cor 16:1

    THE GEOGRAPHY of GALATIA Gal 1:2; Act 18:23; 1 Cor 16:1

    CHAPTER 38 THE GEOGRAPHY OF GALATIA Gal 1:2; Act 18:23; 1 Cor 16:1 Mark Wilson KEY POINTS • Galatia is both a region and a province in central Asia Minor. • The main cities of north Galatia were settled by the Gauls in the third cen- tury bc. • The main cities of south Galatia were founded by the Greeks starting in the third century bc. • Galatia became a Roman province in 25 bc, and the Romans established colonies in many of its cities. • Pamphylia was part of Galatia in Paul’s day, so Perga and Attalia were cities in south Galatia. GALATIA AS A REGION and their families who migrated from Galatia is located in a basin in north-cen- Thrace in 278 bc. They had been invited tral Asia Minor that is largely flat and by Nicomedes I of Bithynia to serve as treeless. Within it are the headwaters of mercenaries in his army. The Galatians the Sangarius River (mode rn Sakarya) were notorious for their destructive and the middle course of the Halys River forays, and in 241 bc the Pergamenes led (modern Kızılırmak). The capital of the by Attalus I defeated them at the battle Hittite Empire—Hattusha (modern of the Caicus. The statue of the dying Boğazköy)—was in eastern Galatia near Gaul, one of antiquity’s most noted the later site of Tavium. The name Galatia works of art, commemorates that victo- derives from the twenty thousand Gauls ry. 1 The three Galatian tribes settled in 1 . For the motif of dying Gauls, see Brigitte Kahl, Galatians Re-imagined: Reading with the Eyes of the Vanquished (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2010), 77–127.
  • Treasure Exhibition Objects

    Treasure Exhibition Objects

    Treasure Exhibition Objects The main focus of the exhibition is the Coin Hoard found in 2012. This is displayed in a conservation laboratory in the middle of the exhibition. There is live conservation ongoing to the Le Catillon Hoard II. Coins are being taken off the main hoard, cleaned, identified and then catalogued and packaged. The rest of the exhibition contains items from Jersey, Guernsey, Sark , Alderney and France from both the Romans and the Celts. l The rest of the exhibition contains items from The ship timbers from Guernsey Jersey, Guernsey, Sark , Alderney and France from l The Orval Chariot Burial from France both the Romans and the Celts. l Coins from Le Catillon Hoard I from Grouville The amount of items from bothe the cultures l Paule Statues from Brittany show their similarities and differences. They l Kings Road burials from Guernsey also demonstrate the variety of objects found archaeologically in these areas. The below list gives you details of every artefact There are a number of artefacts of particular within the exhibition. significance: Orval Chariot Burial Iron ring bolts, possibly elements connected with the chariot shaft. Five copper alloy phalerae decorated with small carved coral plaques, mounted on their support Iron hoops intended to strengthen the hub of each with a birch resin-based glue, occasionally finished of the two wheels. off with a small bronze rivet. (metal disc used to Iron eye bolts and forked rod which were probably adorn the harness) used as shock absorbers between the axel and the Two rein rings. carriage. Two copper alloy harness rings.
  • Cover Page the Handle Holds

    Cover Page the Handle Holds

    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/66262 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Pellegrino, F. Title: The urbanization of the North-Western provinces of the Roman Empire : a juridical and functional approach to town life in Roman Gaul, Germania inferior and Britain Issue Date: 2018-10-17 APPENDIX A: LIST OF CIVITATES IN THE NORTH-WESTERN PROVINCES AND THEIR JURIDICAL STATUS AND DATING (EITHER DATE OR REIGN) A.1 NARBONENSIS INSCRIPTION INSCRIPTION MENTIONING CIVITAS MENTIONING INSCRIPTION MENTIONING ‘COLONIA’ ‘CIVITAS ‘MUNICIPIUM’ ’ Carcassone Tolosa CIL XII 5674 (mil 317-337) C T Narbo CIL XII 4355 (IV AD) civitati CIL XII 4333 (AD 11 ) c(olonia) I(uliae) P(aternae) N(arbonis) M(arti) Baeterrae ILGN 558 (under Augustus); AE 2006, 795=CIL XII, 2930. Luteva: solo un'epigrafe trovata a CIL XII 4247 C CLAUD LUTEVA (Possibly Claudian times) Baeterrae Nimes CIL XII 5624? C(ivitas or colonia) N (293- ILGN 417 (BC 13-12) COL AUG NEM 305AD) Arelate AE 1952, 107 (337-340AD) CIL XII 694 (I AD) Aquae Sextiae CIL XII 408 (second half I AD) Massilia Forum Iulii CIL V 7907 (Commodus) CIL XII 261 (I AD - Hadrian) Antipolis Dinia, Da quando f parte delle alpi AE 1961, 156 (Commodus) AE 1961, 156 (Commodus) CIL XII 6037 (I AD) marittime vedi ILN-Dugn,3 Sogiontii CIL XII 1871 (II AD) Apollinaris Reiorum (Riez) CIL XII 360 (I AD) Apta CIL XII 1116 (I-II AD) Cabellio Avennio CIL XII 1120 (Hadrian – end II AD) Arausio CIL VI 1549 (second half II AD) Piganiol S.
  • Tropaeum Alpium – Trophy of the Alps (7/6 BCE) Published on Judaism and Rome (

    Tropaeum Alpium – Trophy of the Alps (7/6 BCE) Published on Judaism and Rome (

    Tropaeum Alpium – Trophy of the Alps (7/6 BCE) Published on Judaism and Rome (https://www.judaism-and-rome.org) Tropaeum Alpium – Trophy of the Alps (7/6 BCE) Reconstruction of the Tropaeum Alpium [1] The Tropaeum Alpium [2] [3] Patron/Sponsor: Augustus Original Location/Place: La Turbie (Alpes-Maritimes) Actual Location (Collection/Museum): In loco. Original Inscription/Graffito: Diplomatic Inscription: IMPERATORI · CAESARI · DIVI · FILIO · AVGVSTO PONT · MAX · IMP · XIV · TRIB · POT · XVII SENATVS · POPVLVSQVE · ROMANVS QVOD EIVS DVCTV AVSPICIISQVE GENTES ALPINAE OMNES QVAE A MARI SVPERO AD INFERVM PERTINEBANT SVB IMPERIVM P R SVNT REDACTAE GENTES ALPINAE DEVICTAE TRIUMPILINI CAMVNNI VENOSTES VENNONETES ISARCHI BREVNI GENAVNES FOCVNATES VINDELICORVM GENTES QVATTUOR COSVANETES RVCINATES LICATES CATENATES AMBISONTES RUGUSCI SUANETES CALVCONES BRIXENTES LEPONITI VBERI NANTVATES SEDVNI VARAGRI SALASSI ACITAVONES MEDVLLI VCENNI CATVRIGES BRIGIANI SOBIONTI BRODIONTI NEMALONI EDENATES VESVBIANI VEAMINI GALLITAE TRIVLLATI ECDINI VERGVNNI EGVITURI NEMATVRI ORATELLI NERVSI VELAVNI SVETRI Edition Imperatori Caesari divi filio Augusto Pont(ifici) Max(imo) Imp(erator) XIV tr(ibunicia) pot(estate) XVII senatus populusque R(omanus) Page 1 of 5 Tropaeum Alpium – Trophy of the Alps (7/6 BCE) Published on Judaism and Rome (https://www.judaism-and-rome.org) quod eius ductu auspiciisque gentes alpinae omnes quae a mari supero ad inferum pertinebant sub imperium p(opuli) R(omani) sunt redactae gentes alpinae devictae Triumpilini Camunni Venostes Vennonetes
  • Annibal En Gaule

    Annibal En Gaule

    ANNIBAL EN GAULE PAR JEAN COLIN. CAPITAINE D'ARTILLERIE BREVETÉ PARIS - 1904 AVANT-PROPOS. CHAPITRE PREMIER. — La Région rhodanienne avant la conquête romaine. I. Géographie physique. — II . Géographie politique. CHAPITRE II. — Les textes. I. Polybe et Tite-Live. — II . Les historiens anciens. — III . La méthode de Tite- Live. — IV . Polybe. — V. Les textes perdus. — VI . Vie et travaux de Polybe. — VII . Travaux comparatifs sur Polybe et Tite-Live. — VIII . Comparaison des textes. — IX . Les connaissances géographiques des anciens. CHAPITRE III. — Le passage du Rhône. I. L'Emporium au Rhône. — II . Le point de passage. CHAPITRE IV. — La traversée des Alpes. I. La distance du Rhône aux plaines du Pô. — II . Les bords du Rhône. - L'Île. — III . L'entrée dans les Alpes. — IV . A travers les Alpes. — V. Le col. CONCLUSION. TRADUCTION DES TEXTES. I. Le récit de Polybe. — II . Le récit de Tite-Live. AVANT-PROPOS. Quelle route Annibal a-t-il suivie dans sa marche à travers la Gaule ? Il n'y a guère de problème historique plus captivant que celui-ci ; mais on lui a fait une réputation détestable; les savants le croient insoluble, et il leur paraît aussi fou de le reprendre pour la millième fois que de tenter la quadrature du cercle; encore n'est-ce pas aussi méritoire, car c'est une distraction accessible aux moindres talents. On n'admet pas que les données soient en nombre assez grand, et de nature assez précise : une dissertation sur la marche d'Annibal ne saurait être qu'une œuvre d'imagination, non un travail scientifique basé sur des faits positifs, aboutissant à des conclusions en règle.
  • Map 17 Lugdunum Compiled by E

    Map 17 Lugdunum Compiled by E

    Map 17 Lugdunum Compiled by E. Bertrand, 1997 Introduction From both geographic and economic perspectives, the area covered by the map divides into three zones, west to east. In the west, the economy of the Massif Central (ancient Cebenna Mons) depended upon animal husbandry, forestry and mining. Ancient authors (note Strabo 4.6.9) emphasize how hard life was in the high mountains, and this zone–like the Alps to the east–was resistant to romanization. The Alps (where the economy was similar) formed a natural boundary; securing its passes became a necessity for Roman administration. Both before and after the conquest, these passes were used more than the coast road for traffic between Italy and Gaul, and they remain vital economic arteries for the area. It has always been difficult to identify the minor towns and road stations located in the Alps by the ancient itineraries, in particular because of considerable erosion which has buried many sites beneath alluvium. In the center, the romanization of the R. Rhône (ancient Rhodanus) valley was more rapid and more complete. In the fertile land of the Rhône plains there remain traces of extensive Roman centuriation linked to the colonies there. Archaeological survey has also located numerous villas in this zone, although very few are excavated. The Rhône and the roads along it were a key axis in the economic relationship between Italy, Gaul and Spain. Major changes to the physical landscape since antiquity are few. In the Alps, a number of reservoirs have been constructed; notably, at Serre-Ponçon such development has led to the submersion of several valleys near Vappincum.
  • Barbarians of the Black Sea – the Galatians and Odrysian Thrace

    Barbarians of the Black Sea – the Galatians and Odrysian Thrace

    049: Barbarians of the Black Sea – The Galatians and Odrysian Thrace The term “barbarian” is often played fast and loose in the writings of the Greek and Roman authors, whether to simply designate persons or peoples of non-Greco Roman origin, or with a decidedly negative tilt, indicating inferiority in either a cultural or moral sense. One of the goals of the podcast is to try and expand the horizon in terms of cultures and civilizations that we learn about, versus exclusively focusing on the Greeks or Romans, not only because it gives us a better understanding of the peoples who also lived and died during the Hellenistic period, but also because it allows us to learn more about the Greeks and Romans themselves in the context of their environment, and their interactions within said environment. Please excuse my self-aggrandizement, but I bring this topic up because it has relevancy with today’s episode and our current theme of staying around Asia Minor and the Black Sea Region. Though primarily dominated by Greek, Macedonian and, as we saw in the last episode, Iranian rulers, Hellenistic Asia Minor was also home to two major groups that are almost exclusively labelled as “barbarians” within our sources: the first are a relatively new peoples on the scene known as the Galatians, but better understood as the descendants of Celtic warbands that invaded Asia Minor in the early 3rd century and settled the region known as Galatia in today’s Central Turkey. The second are the Thracians, a mountain people scattered across much of the northeastern Balkans, and of particular note is the Odyrsian Kingdom, which was the most powerful indigenous state to emerge in Thrace during the around the Hellenistic period.