DOCSLIB.ORG

THE GEOGRAPHY of GALATIA Gal 1:2; Act 18:23; 1 Cor 16:1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE GEOGRAPHY of GALATIA Gal 1:2; Act 18:23; 1 Cor 16:1 CHAPTER 38 THE GEOGRAPHY OF GALATIA Gal 1:2; Act 18:23; 1 Cor 16:1 Mark Wilson KEY POINTS • Galatia is both a region and a province in central Asia Minor. • The main cities of north Galatia were settled by the Gauls in the third cen- tury bc. • The main cities of south Galatia were founded by the Greeks starting in the third century bc. • Galatia became a Roman province in 25 bc, and the Romans established colonies in many of its cities. • Pamphylia was part of Galatia in Paul’s day, so Perga and Attalia were cities in south Galatia. GALATIA AS A REGION and their families who migrated from Galatia is located in a basin in north-cen- Thrace in 278 bc. They had been invited tral Asia Minor that is largely flat and by Nicomedes I of Bithynia to serve as treeless. Within it are the headwaters of mercenaries in his army. The Galatians the Sangarius River (mode rn Sakarya) were notorious for their destructive and the middle course of the Halys River forays, and in 241 bc the Pergamenes led (modern Kızılırmak). The capital of the by Attalus I defeated them at the battle Hittite Empire—Hattusha (modern of the Caicus. The statue of the dying Boğazköy)—was in eastern Galatia near Gaul, one of antiquity’s most noted the later site of Tavium. The name Galatia works of art, commemorates that victo- derives from the twenty thousand Gauls ry. 1 The three Galatian tribes settled in 1 . For the motif of dying Gauls, see Brigitte Kahl, Galatians Re-imagined: Reading with the Eyes of the Vanquished (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2010), 77–127. For a Roman copy of the original 483 484 Lexham Geographic Commentary on Acts through Revelation Galatia, Pamphylia, and Lycaonia Juliopolis Via Sebaste (Roman road built ~6 B.C.) ! Hattusha Ancyra ! ! Dorylaeum Midaion ! ! ! Tavium Germa ! Pessinus ! PHRYGIA Amorion ! Dokimeion ! GALATIA Caesarea! !Prymnessos ! CAPPADOCIA S u l t Synnada a n M Philomelium ! Pisidian Antioch o ! ! u Tyraion Colonia n ! Claudiolaodicea t a ! Dabenae R Hadrianoupolis s i n ! Apamea ! u s ! ! Parlais t hi ! An Neopolis Apollonia ! Lake Limnae ! ! Timbriada s ! Pappa LYCAONIA n t a i n Lake Askania PISIDIA Lake Karalis Iconium o u ! s M Lysinoe ! ! ! Cybistra u Malos Lystra ! r a u Sagalassus ! R Mistea ! T n Sidamaria ! ! o Adada d ! Tynna (Dana) e ! Cremna R m Derbe y Podandos Olbasa s ! r Cilician Gates ! o Kodylessos ! r u t s ! Selge E ! Pyrgoi Comama e Isauria ! K ! T a ! Posala ! ! u Ilistra CILICIA PEDIAS PAMPHYLIA r u Laranda Termessos s CILICIA ! ! M ! ! Etenna o u ! Perga n t ! LYCIA Aspendos a i n Attalia s Pompeiopolis Tarsus ! ! Side Ninica ! Phaselis Korakesion Arykanda! ! ! CILICIA TRACHEIA Syedra Korykos Olympus ! ! ! Seleucia! Limyra! Myra! Celenderis ! 0 60 mi ! Anemourion © 2018 Faithlife 0 60 km these cities in Galatia: the Tolistobogii MAIN CITIES IN 3 at Pessinus, the Tectosages at Ancyra, NORTH GALATIA and the Trocmi at Tavium (Livy, History Pessinus (modern Ballıhisar) was sit- 38.16.10–12). The Romans became active uated in western Galatia on the west side in Galatia in the second century bc, and of sacred Mount Dindymus. In the third in 65 bc Pompey defeated the Pontic century bc the Tolistobogii, the west- king Mithradates VI Eupator, thereby ernmost Galatian tribe, made Pessinus removing his hegemony over the region. their capital. The city was famous for its A council and tetrarchs ruled until 63 bc shrine of the Phrygian mother goddess when Deiotarus killed his fellow tribal Cybele. According to Diodorus Siculus kings and assumed the sole monarchy. the Phrygian king Midas founded the Other leaders followed until Rome took temple in the eighth century bc (3.59.8). direct control of the region in 25 bc after Its priests called Galli were notorious for the death of the Galatian king Amyntas being eunuchs; however, castration for (reigned 36–25 bc).2 Romans was forbidden by the Roman Senate and later outlawed by Domitian (Suetonius, Life of Domitian 7.1).4 Cybele’s statue from Pergamum, see the website of the Musei Capitolini in Rome, “Statue of ‘Capitoline Gaul,’” http://www.museicapitolini.org/en/collezioni/percorsi_per_sale/palazzo_nuovo/ sala_del_gladiatore/statua_del_galata_capitolino. 2 . A detailed discussion of Galatia’s geography and history can be found in Stephen Mitchell, Anatolia: Lands, Men, and Gods in Asia Minor (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), 1:13–58. 3 . For a more detailed discussion of these cities, see chapter 46, “Peter’s Communities in Asia Minor.” 4. This practice has been cited as a background for Paul’s comment that those agitating the Galatians should castrate themselves (Gal 5:12); see Susan M. Elliott, Cutting Too Close The Geography of Galatia 485 cult stone was believed to have fallen northern cities became Roman colonies: from heaven (compare the Ephesian Ancyra—Sebasteni Tectosages Ancyrani; Artemis, Acts 19:35). In 204 bc the Romans Pessinus—Sebasteni Tolistobogii brought the black meteorite stone to Pessinuntii; and Tavium—Sebasteni Rome as a talisman in their fight against Trocmi Taviani. An imperial cult temple Hannibal (Livy, History 29.10.4–29.11.9). In for Augustus was started between 10 bc– 191 bc it was installed in a temple erected ad 10 and completed around ad 19/20 on the Palatine Hill to honor the Great by Tiberius. Perhaps the most famous Mother (Magna Mater). Roman inscription from antiquity— Ancyra (modern Ankara) was founded, called the “Queen of Inscriptions”—is according to one myth, by the Phrygian found on its walls: the bilingual (Greek king Midas. Situated on a rocky acropolis, and Latin) Monumentum Ancyranum, or it was at the junction of seven key routes. Res Gestae Divi Augusti (“Deeds of the Ancyra became the second metropolis of Deified Augustus”). Before his death on Phrygia after Gordium. Around 265 bc August 19, ad 14, Augustus composed the Galatian tribe, Tectosages, made an account of his personal achieve- Ancyra its capital after receiving the site ments during his reign. While the orig- from the Pontic kingdom. inal bronze tablets upon which it was Tavium (modern Büyüknefes) and its engraved in Rome are lost, it is preserved two mounds show continuous occupation almost in its entirety on the Ancyra tem- since prehistoric times. Around 232 bc the Trocmi, the easternmost Galatian tribe, made it their primary settlement. Tavium sat at an important junction of four highways with an orientation toward Cappadocia and the Euphrates River Basin. GALATIA AS A ROMAN PROVINCE In 25 bc a hostile Pisidian tribe killed Rome’s client king Amyntas, and Augustus then annexed the province of Galatia (Dio Cassius 53.26.3). He made Ancyra its capital. The new province included not only geographic Galatia but also Pisidia, eastern Phrygia, Lycaonia, Isauria, and Pamphylia. In 6 bc Paphlagonia and in 3/2 bc Pontus Galaticus were also added. Around 22–21 bc Galatia’s three Portion of the Res Gestae Divi Augusti for Comfort: Paul’s Letter to the Galatians in its Anatolian Cultic Context (London: T&T Clark, 2003), 158–257. 486 Lexham Geographic Commentary on Acts through Revelation ple.5 At the Roman colony of Pisidian the strategic value of a remote site like Antioch (modern Yalvaç) fragments of Lystra began to decrease. the Latin text were found at the entrance Pisidian Antioch9 (modern Yalvaç) of the Augustus temple built in the early was one of sixteen cities founded by first centuryad , while fragments of the Seleucid ruler Antiochus I. It is sit- the Greek version were discovered in uated on a plateau in the foothills of the Apollonia (modern Uluborlu).6 On the Sultan Mountain range (Sultandağı). temple’s southern wall another Greek The Anthius River (Yalvaç Çay) flows inscription lists twenty high priests of below the acropolis’ eastern face. Called the Galatian assembly (κοινόν, koinon) Colonia Caesarea Antiochia, it was settled who served during the reign of Tiberius. by approximately three thousand veter- Further imperial cult activity is evident ans of Legions V Gallica and VII and their in Pessinus where a Corinthian imperial families, suggesting a total population of cult temple (Sebasteion) was built during around ten thousand. The city was strate- the reign of Tiberius (approximately gically located on the common, or south- ad 25–35). Tavium hosted games related ern, highway that ran from the Cilician to the imperial cult that were sponsored Gates to Ephesus. The Via Sebaste pro- by the provincial assembly (koinon). vided a link to the Mediterranean coast at Pamphylia. BIBLICAL CITIES IN Iconium (modern Konya) was THE PROVINCE founded as a Phrygian settlement on To contain the hostile Homanadenses the western edge of a vast fertile plain. in their strongholds in the Taurus The city became a Roman colony under Mountains, Augustus founded thirteen Augustus; however, the Greek polis was colonies with military veterans after allowed to exist alongside the colony 25 bc including Pisidian Antioch and until the time of Hadrian (approximately Lystra. In 6 bc he built the Via Sebaste ad 135) when the Roman colony absorbed from Perga to connect these colonies. the polis. Around ad 41/42 during Pisidian Antioch was its caput viae Claudius’ reign the city received the hon- (roadhead) because it was the apex of orific title Claudiconium. Iconium was a the Pisidian triangle.7 Pacification of major transportation node in south-cen- southern Galatia was completed by ad 6 tral Galatia with six roads branching in by Quirinius (Tacitus, Annales 3.48),8 and every direction to major cities. 5 . See page XXX for an image of a replica with part of the inscription. Alison E.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Seven Churches of Revelation Turkey
    TRAVEL GUIDE SEVEN CHURCHES OF REVELATION TURKEY TURKEY Pergamum Lesbos Thyatira Sardis Izmir Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Samos Ephesus Laodicea Aegean Sea Patmos ASIA Kos 1 Rhodes ARCHEOLOGICAL MAP OF WESTERN TURKEY BULGARIA Sinanköy Manya Mt. NORTH EDİRNE KIRKLARELİ Selimiye Fatih Iron Foundry Mosque UNESCO B L A C K S E A MACEDONIA Yeni Saray Kırklareli Höyük İSTANBUL Herakleia Skotoussa (Byzantium) Krenides Linos (Constantinople) Sirra Philippi Beikos Palatianon Berge Karaevlialtı Menekşe Çatağı Prusias Tauriana Filippoi THRACE Bathonea Küçükyalı Ad hypium Morylos Dikaia Heraion teikhos Achaeology Edessa Neapolis park KOCAELİ Tragilos Antisara Abdera Perinthos Basilica UNESCO Maroneia TEKİRDAĞ (İZMİT) DÜZCE Europos Kavala Doriskos Nicomedia Pella Amphipolis Stryme Işıklar Mt. ALBANIA Allante Lete Bormiskos Thessalonica Argilos THE SEA OF MARMARA SAKARYA MACEDONIANaoussa Apollonia Thassos Ainos (ADAPAZARI) UNESCO Thermes Aegae YALOVA Ceramic Furnaces Selectum Chalastra Strepsa Berea Iznik Lake Nicea Methone Cyzicus Vergina Petralona Samothrace Parion Roman theater Acanthos Zeytinli Ada Apamela Aisa Ouranopolis Hisardere Dasaki Elimia Pydna Barçın Höyük BTHYNIA Galepsos Yenibademli Höyük BURSA UNESCO Antigonia Thyssus Apollonia (Prusa) ÇANAKKALE Manyas Zeytinlik Höyük Arisbe Lake Ulubat Phylace Dion Akrothooi Lake Sane Parthenopolis GÖKCEADA Aktopraklık O.Gazi Külliyesi BİLECİK Asprokampos Kremaste Daskyleion UNESCO Höyük Pythion Neopolis Astyra Sundiken Mts. Herakleum Paşalar Sarhöyük Mount Athos Achmilleion Troy Pessinus Potamia Mt.Olympos
    [Show full text]
  • Concert Choir Tour in TURKEY an Opportunity to Sing in Historic Christian Locations
    Concert Choir Tour in TURKEY An Opportunity to Sing in Historic Christian Locations Choir Tour in rt U R K E T U R K E ce T Y UR T Y n KE U R K E Co Y T Y s A n n CHOIR o CHOIR O i p t p a o c r o GROUPS t L u GROUPS n n i a t i y t s t i o r T S h C T U Si n c T R g U S i r K U i o n Ut O R H s T i T T K U T O U U T R S K U T O U An Opportunity to Sing in Historic Christian Locations alk in the footsteps of Paul and John. Travel to sites connected with Paul’s First, Second and Third Missionary Journeys W(Attalia, Perge, Aspendos, Pisidian Antioch, Loadicea, Hierapolis, Ephesus) and the Seven Churches (Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia, Laodicea) to whom John wrote the Book of Revelation. Added to these magnificent biblical sites is a two-day visit to Istanbul where you can enjoy its rich historical sites and impressive archeological museum, as well as a short cruise on the Bosphorus Sea. BLACK SEA ISTANBUL CANAKKALE ALEXANDER TROAS TURKEY A PERGAMON E S SARDIS PHILADELPHIA PSIDIAN ANTIOCH N IZMIR PAMUKKALE A EPHESUS (HIERAPOLIS) E LAODICEA G E A ANTALYA PERGE DAY 01 FRI DEPART USA EA DAY 02 SAT ARRIVE ISTANBUL MEDITERRANEAN S DAY 03 SUN ISTANBUL DAY 04 MON ISTANBUL - FLY ANTALYA DAY 05 THU PERGA - ASPENDOS - ANTALYA DAY 06 FRI ANTIOCH OF PISIDIA – LAODICEA - PAMUKKALE DAY 07 SAT HIERAPOLIS - PHILADELPHIA - SARDIS - IZMIR DAY 08 SUN PERGAMUM - IZMIR DAY 09 MON EPHESUS - KUSADASI DAY 10 TUE SMYRNA - IZMIR DAY 11 WED IZMIR AIRPORT - FLY BACK HOME PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE: Sun, Day 3 Morning Worship Service followed by a short concert performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Poison King: the Life and Legend of Mithradates the Great, Rome's
    Copyrighted Material Kill em All, and Let the Gods Sort em Out IN SPRING of 88 BC, in dozens of cities across Anatolia (Asia Minor, modern Turkey), sworn enemies of Rome joined a secret plot. On an appointed day in one month’s time, they vowed to kill every Roman man, woman, and child in their territories. e conspiracy was masterminded by King Mithradates the Great, who communicated secretly with numerous local leaders in Rome’s new Province of Asia. (“Asia” at this time referred to lands from the eastern Aegean to India; Rome’s Province of Asia encompassed western Turkey.) How Mithradates kept the plot secret remains one of the great intelli- gence mysteries of antiquity. e conspirators promised to round up and slay all the Romans and Italians living in their towns, including women and children and slaves of Italian descent. ey agreed to confiscate the Romans’ property and throw the bodies out to the dogs and crows. Any- one who tried to warn or protect Romans or bury their bodies was to be harshly punished. Slaves who spoke languages other than Latin would be spared, and those who joined in the killing of their masters would be rewarded. People who murdered Roman moneylenders would have their debts canceled. Bounties were offered to informers and killers of Romans in hiding.1 e deadly plot worked perfectly. According to several ancient histo- rians, at least 80,000—perhaps as many as 150,000—Roman and Italian residents of Anatolia and Aegean islands were massacred on that day. e figures are shocking—perhaps exaggerated—but not unrealistic.
    [Show full text]
  • Tentative Lists Submitted by States Parties As of 15 April 2021, in Conformity with the Operational Guidelines
    World Heritage 44 COM WHC/21/44.COM/8A Paris, 4 June 2021 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Extended forty-fourth session Fuzhou (China) / Online meeting 16 – 31 July 2021 Item 8 of the Provisional Agenda: Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger 8A. Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 15 April 2021, in conformity with the Operational Guidelines SUMMARY This document presents the Tentative Lists of all States Parties submitted in conformity with the Operational Guidelines as of 15 April 2021. • Annex 1 presents a full list of States Parties indicating the date of the most recent Tentative List submission. • Annex 2 presents new Tentative Lists (or additions to Tentative Lists) submitted by States Parties since 16 April 2019. • Annex 3 presents a list of all sites included in the Tentative Lists of the States Parties to the Convention, in alphabetical order. Draft Decision: 44 COM 8A, see point II I. EXAMINATION OF TENTATIVE LISTS 1. The World Heritage Convention provides that each State Party to the Convention shall submit to the World Heritage Committee an inventory of the cultural and natural sites situated within its territory, which it considers suitable for inscription on the World Heritage List, and which it intends to nominate during the following five to ten years. Over the years, the Committee has repeatedly confirmed the importance of these Lists, also known as Tentative Lists, for planning purposes, comparative analyses of nominations and for facilitating the undertaking of global and thematic studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Cappadocia and Cappadocians in the Hellenistic, Roman and Early
    Dokuz Eylül University – DEU The Research Center for the Archaeology of Western Anatolia – EKVAM Colloquia Anatolica et Aegaea Congressus internationales Smyrnenses X Cappadocia and Cappadocians in the Hellenistic, Roman and Early Byzantine periods An international video conference on the southeastern part of central Anatolia in classical antiquity May 14-15, 2020 / Izmir, Turkey Edited by Ergün Laflı Izmir 2020 Last update: 04/05/2020. 1 Cappadocia and Cappadocians in the Hellenistic, Roman and Early Byzantine periods. Papers presented at the international video conference on the southeastern part of central Anatolia in classical antiquity, May 14-15, 2020 / Izmir, Turkey, Colloquia Anatolica et Aegaea – Acta congressus communis omnium gentium Smyrnae. Copyright © 2020 Ergün Laflı (editor) All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission from the editor. ISBN: 978-605-031-211-9. Page setting: Ergün Laflı (Izmir). Text corrections and revisions: Hugo Thoen (Deinze / Ghent). Papers, presented at the international video conference, entitled “Cappadocia and Cappadocians in the Hellenistic, Roman and Early Byzantine periods. An international video conference on the southeastern part of central Anatolia in classical antiquity” in May 14–15, 2020 in Izmir, Turkey. 36 papers with 61 pages and numerous colourful figures. All papers and key words are in English. 21 x 29,7 cm; paperback; 40 gr. quality paper. Frontispiece. A Roman stele with two portraits in the Museum of Kırşehir; accession nos. A.5.1.95a-b (photograph by E.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek-Anatolian Language Contact and the Settlement of Pamphylia
    CHRISTINA SKELTON Greek-Anatolian Language Contact and the Settlement of Pamphylia The Ancient Greek dialect of Pamphylia shows extensive influence from the nearby Anatolian languages. Evidence from the linguistics of Greek and Anatolian, sociolinguistics, and the histor- ical and archaeological record suggest that this influence is due to Anatolian speakers learning Greek as a second language as adults in such large numbers that aspects of their L2 Greek became fixed as a part of the main Pamphylian dialect. For this linguistic development to occur and persist, Pamphylia must initially have been settled by a small number of Greeks, and remained isolated from the broader Greek-speaking community while prevailing cultural atti- tudes favored a combined Greek-Anatolian culture. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND The Greek-speaking world of the Archaic and Classical periods (ca. ninth through third centuries BC) was covered by a patchwork of different dialects of Ancient Greek, some of them quite different from the Attic and Ionic familiar to Classicists. Even among these varied dialects, the dialect of Pamphylia, located on the southern coast of Asia Minor, stands out as something unusual. For example, consider the following section from the famous Pamphylian inscription from Sillyon: συ Διϝι̣ α̣ ̣ και hιιαροισι Μανεˉ[ς .]υαν̣ hελε ΣελυW[ι]ιυ̣ ς̣ ̣ [..? hι†ια[ρ]α ϝιλ̣ σιι̣ ọς ̣ υπαρ και ανιιας̣ οσα περ(̣ ι)ι[στα]τυ ̣ Wοικ[. .] The author would like to thank Sally Thomason, Craig Melchert, Leonard Neidorf and the anonymous reviewer for their valuable input, as well as Greg Nagy and everyone at the Center for Hellenic Studies for allowing me to use their library and for their wonderful hospitality during the early stages of pre- paring this manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Achaemenid Persia on Fourth-Century and Early Hellenistic Greek Tyranny
    THE INFLUENCE OF ACHAEMENID PERSIA ON FOURTH-CENTURY AND EARLY HELLENISTIC GREEK TYRANNY Miles Lester-Pearson A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2015 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/11826 This item is protected by original copyright The influence of Achaemenid Persia on fourth-century and early Hellenistic Greek tyranny Miles Lester-Pearson This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of St Andrews Submitted February 2015 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, Miles Lester-Pearson, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 88,000 words in length, has been written by me, and that it is the record of work carried out by me, or principally by myself in collaboration with others as acknowledged, and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September 2010 and as a candidate for the degree of PhD in September 2011; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2010 and 2015. Date: Signature of Candidate: 2. Supervisor’s declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of PhD in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree.
    [Show full text]
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography
    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cultural Creation of Fulvia Flacca Bambula
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-2017 The cultural creation of Fulvia Flacca Bambula. Erin Leigh Wotring University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons, History of Gender Commons, Intellectual History Commons, Political History Commons, Social History Commons, and the Women's History Commons Recommended Citation Wotring, Erin Leigh, "The cultural creation of Fulvia Flacca Bambula." (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2691. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/2691 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CULTURAL CREATION OF FULVIA FLACCA BAMBULA By Erin Leigh Wotring A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts in History Department of History University of Louisville Louisville, KY May, 2017 Copyright 2017 by Erin Leigh Wotring All rights reserved THE CULTURAL CREATION OF FULVIA FLACCA BAMBULA By Erin Leigh Wotring A Thesis Approved on April 14, 2017 by the following Thesis Committee: Dr. Jennifer Westerfeld, Director Dr. Blake Beattie Dr. Carmen Hardin ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology and History of Lydia from the Early Lydian Period to Late Antiquity (8Th Century B.C.-6Th Century A.D.)
    Dokuz Eylül University – DEU The Research Center for the Archaeology of Western Anatolia – EKVAM Colloquia Anatolica et Aegaea Congressus internationales Smyrnenses IX Archaeology and history of Lydia from the early Lydian period to late antiquity (8th century B.C.-6th century A.D.). An international symposium May 17-18, 2017 / Izmir, Turkey ABSTRACTS Edited by Ergün Laflı Gülseren Kan Şahin Last Update: 21/04/2017. Izmir, May 2017 Websites: https://independent.academia.edu/TheLydiaSymposium https://www.researchgate.net/profile/The_Lydia_Symposium 1 This symposium has been dedicated to Roberto Gusmani (1935-2009) and Peter Herrmann (1927-2002) due to their pioneering works on the archaeology and history of ancient Lydia. Fig. 1: Map of Lydia and neighbouring areas in western Asia Minor (S. Patacı, 2017). 2 Table of contents Ergün Laflı, An introduction to Lydian studies: Editorial remarks to the abstract booklet of the Lydia Symposium....................................................................................................................................................8-9. Nihal Akıllı, Protohistorical excavations at Hastane Höyük in Akhisar………………………………10. Sedat Akkurnaz, New examples of Archaic architectural terracottas from Lydia………………………..11. Gülseren Alkış Yazıcı, Some remarks on the ancient religions of Lydia……………………………….12. Elif Alten, Revolt of Achaeus against Antiochus III the Great and the siege of Sardis, based on classical textual, epigraphic and numismatic evidence………………………………………………………………....13. Gaetano Arena, Heleis: A chief doctor in Roman Lydia…….……………………………………....14. Ilias N. Arnaoutoglou, Κοινὸν, συμβίωσις: Associations in Hellenistic and Roman Lydia……….……..15. Eirini Artemi, The role of Ephesus in the late antiquity from the period of Diocletian to A.D. 449, the “Robber Synod”.……………………………………………………………………….………...16. Natalia S. Astashova, Anatolian pottery from Panticapaeum…………………………………….17-18. Ayşegül Aykurt, Minoan presence in western Anatolia……………………………………………...19.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Handling of Facts and Strategy in Cicero's Speech In
    Nova Tellus ISSN: 0185-3058 [email protected] Centro de Estudios Clásicos México Nótári, Tamás Handling of Facts and Strategy in Cicero’s Speech in Defence of King Deiotarus Nova Tellus, vol. 30, núm. 2, 2012, pp. 99-116 Centro de Estudios Clásicos Distrito Federal, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=59128313004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Handling of Facts and Strategy in Cicero’s Speech in Defence of King Deiotarus Tamás NÓTÁRI Károli Gáspár University, Budapest / Faculty of Law and Political Science [email protected] ABSTRACT : The three orationes Caesarianae, i.e., Pro Marcello and Pro Lig- ario given in 46 and Pro rege Deiotaro delivered in 45 are connected by the fact that the addressee of all of them is Caesar. The speech made in defence of King Deiotarus is the fruit (if possible) of both a legally and rhetorically critical situation: the judge of the case is identical with the injured party of the act brought as a charge: Caesar. Thus, the proceedings, conducted in the absence of the accused, in which eventually no judgment was passed, should be considered a manifestation of Caesar’s arrogance, who made mockery of the lawsuit, rather than a real action-at-law. This speech has outstanding significance both in terms of the lawyer’s/orator’s handling of the facts of the case under circumstances far from usual, and in the development of the relation between Cicero and Caesar.
    [Show full text]
  • Catullus, Memmius, and Bithynia
    Catullus, Memmius, and Bithynia Gaius Memmius was the son-in-law of Sulla, an orator who won backhanded praise from Cicero (Brut. 247), seducer of the wife of Marcus Lucullus (Cic. Att. 1. 18. 3) and a fierce adversary of his brother (Plut. Cat. Mi. 29. 5-8), a poet whose immodesty impressed Ovid (Tr. 2. 433), a praetor (Cic. Q. fr. 1. 2. 16), a candidate for the consulship, a disgraced exile, the probable but imperfect patron of Lucretius, and a perfect villain for Catullus, and a successful military commander, hailed by his troops as “Imperator.” The last is evidenced by a denarius (427 Crawford). The obverse presents the head of Ceres, facing right, with C∙ MEMMI C ∙ F ∙ reading downwards. On the reverse is a trophy and a kneeling captive with hands tied behind his back; reading downwards on the left is the title IMPERATOR and on the right C ∙ MEMMIUS. To my knowledge this remarkable coin is never brought up in discussions of Catullus, despite the fact that Catullus would have been serving in the cohors of Memmius at the time he was acclaimed imperator. Crawford and others date the coin to 56, following the consensus that Memmius was governor of Bithynia in 57. This presents a problem, for it seems unlikely that Memmius could have engaged in any significant military campaign nine years after the province had been pacified (Cic. Agr. 2. 47) and a full five years after Pompey’s settlement of the East. It is much more likely that Memmius’ victory was earlier, at a time when there was still potential unrest in the area of Bithynia following Mithradates’ resurgence in 67.
    [Show full text]