DOCSLIB.ORG

47021-002: Federally Administered Tribal Areas Water Resources

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
47021-002: Federally Administered Tribal Areas Water Resources Initial Environmental Examination Report ________________________________________ Project Number: 47021-002 Loan Number: 3239 PAK: Federally Administered Tribal Areas Water Resources Development Project Initial Environmental Examination Report for Jay Dam, District Mohmand Prepared by Project Management Unit, Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan For the Asian Development Bank Date received by ADB: April 2018 NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and its agencies ends on 30 June. (ii) In this report “$” refer to US dollars. This initial environmental examination report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Project Management Unit PMU FATA Water Resources Development Project FWRDP FATA Secretariat FEDERALLY ADMINISTERED TRIBAL AREAS WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION (IEE) JAY DAM (MOHMAND AGENCY) 2017 FATA WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CONSULTANTS JOINT VENTURE: House # 3, Street # 1, Near Board Bazar, Tajabad, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Tel: +92 91 5601635 - 6 Fax: +92 91 5840807 E-mail: [email protected] Initial Environmental Examination: FATA Water Resources Development Project Jay Dam Pilot subproject TABLE OF CONTENTS Sr. No. Description Page No. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................... 1 General .................................................................................................................... 1 Project Background ................................................................................................. 1 Project Consultants .................................................................................................. 2 Purpose of This Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) ......................................... 2 IEE Methodology ..................................................................................................... 4 Study Area ............................................................................................................... 4 Baseline Survey Methodology ................................................................................. 6 Impact Assessment Methodology ............................................................................ 6 Committee on Seismic Aspects of Dam Design (ICOLD) ......................................... 7 Report Format ......................................................................................................... 8 Project Categorization ............................................................................................. 9 POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ................................................... 10 General ...................................................................................................................10 National Policy and Legal Framework .....................................................................10 Regulations for Environmental Assessment, Pakistan EPA ....................................10 Regulatory Clearances, EPA ..................................................................................11 Guidelines for Environmental Assessment, Pakistan EPA ......................................11 Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency Review of IEE and EIA Regulations, (2000). ...............................................................................................................................11 National Environmental Quality Standards (NEQS) ................................................11 ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS), 2009 ....................................................12 Project Categorization ............................................................................................13 Other Environment Related Legislations .................................................................14 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................... 17 Project Features .....................................................................................................17 Project Location ......................................................................................................21 Project Objectives ...................................................................................................21 Construction Planning .............................................................................................22 Stage-I ....................................................................................................................22 Stage- II ..................................................................................................................22 Project Implementation ...........................................................................................23 C.6.1 Executing Agency ...................................................................................................23 C.6.2 Design Consultant ..................................................................................................23 C.6.3 FATA Development Working Party .........................................................................23 i | TOC Initial Environmental Examination: FATA Water Resources Development Project Jay Dam Pilot subproject C.6.4 Terms of Partnership ..............................................................................................24 Operation and Maintenance ....................................................................................24 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................... 25 General ...................................................................................................................25 Baseline Survey Methodology ................................................................................25 Study Area ..............................................................................................................27 Physical Environment .............................................................................................29 Topography ............................................................................................................29 Climate ...................................................................................................................30 Hydrology ...............................................................................................................31 Regional Geomorphology .......................................................................................31 Geology of the Project Area ....................................................................................32 Soil .........................................................................................................................32 Seismology .............................................................................................................33 Ambient Air and Noise Quality ................................................................................35 Water Resources ....................................................................................................35 Water Quality ..........................................................................................................38 Land use and Land Cover.......................................................................................40 Biological Environment ...........................................................................................41 Flora .......................................................................................................................41 Fauna .....................................................................................................................45 Avifauna .................................................................................................................45 Fisheries .................................................................................................................48 Protected areas / National sanctuaries ...................................................................48 Socio-Economic Environment .................................................................................49 Administrative Set Up .............................................................................................49 Demographic Profile ...............................................................................................50 Family Size .............................................................................................................51 Dwelling ..................................................................................................................51 Language ...............................................................................................................51 The Family System .................................................................................................51 Livestock ................................................................................................................52
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mohmad Agency Blockwise
    POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD DETAIL FROM BLOCK TO DISTRICT LEVEL FATA (MOHMAND AGENCY) ADMIN UNIT POPULATION NO OF HH MOHMAND AGENCY 466,984 48,118 AMBAR UTMAN KHEL TEHSIL 62,109 6,799 AMBAR UTMAN KHEL TRIBE 62,109 6799 BAZEED KOR SECTION 21,174 2428 BAHADAR KOR 4,794 488 082050106 695 50 082050107 515 54 082050108 256 33 082050109 643 65 082050110 226 35 082050111 326 39 082050112 425 55 082050113 837 64 082050114 192 24 082050115 679 69 BAZID KOR 8,226 943 082050116 689 71 082050117 979 80 082050118 469 45 082050119 1,062 128 082050120 1,107 145 082050121 655 72 082050122 845 123 082050123 1,094 111 082050124 455 60 082050125 871 108 ISA KOR 3,859 490 082050126 753 93 082050127 1,028 104 082050128 947 118 082050129 715 106 082050130 416 69 KOT MAINGAN 673 79 082050105 673 79 WALI BEG 3,622 428 082050101 401 49 082050102 690 71 082050103 1,414 157 082050104 1,117 151 MAIN GAN SECTION 40,935 4371 AKU KOR 5,478 583 082050223 1,304 117 082050224 154 32 082050225 490 41 082050226 413 40 082050227 1,129 106 082050228 1,988 247 BANE KOR 8,626 1012 Page 1 of 12 POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD DETAIL FROM BLOCK TO DISTRICT LEVEL FATA (MOHMAND AGENCY) ADMIN UNIT POPULATION NO OF HH 082050214 1,208 121 082050215 1,363 141 082050216 672 67 082050217 901 99 082050218 1,117 175 082050219 1,507 174 082050220 448 76 082050221 839 79 082050222 571 80 KHORWANDE 1,907 184 082050229 1,714 159 082050230 193 25 MAIN GAN 11,832 1182 082050201 1,209 114 082050202 1,105 124 082050203 1,322 128 082050204 1,387 138 082050205 1,043 75 082050206 774 71 082050207 763 75 082050208
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Belt and the Defence of British India: a Critical Appraisal of British Strategy in the North-West Frontier During the First World War
    Tribal Belt and the Defence of British India: A Critical Appraisal of British Strategy in the North-West Frontier during the First World War Dr. Salman Bangash. “History is certainly being made in this corridor…and I am sure a great deal more history is going to be made there in the near future - perhaps in a rather unpleasant way, but anyway in an important way.” (Arnold J. Toynbee )1 Introduction No region of the British Empire afforded more grandeur, influence, power, status and prestige then India. The British prominence in India was unique and incomparable. For this very reason the security and safety of India became the prime objective of British Imperial foreign policy in India. India was the symbol of appealing, thriving, profitable and advantageous British Imperial greatness. Closely interlinked with the question of the imperial defence of India was the tribal belt2 or tribal areas in the North-West Frontier region inhabitant by Pashtun ethnic groups. The area was defined topographically as a strategic zone of defence, which had substantial geo-political and geo-strategic significance for the British rule in India. Tribal areas posed a complicated and multifaceted defence problem for the British in India during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Peace, stability and effective control in this sensitive area was vital and indispensable for the security and defence of India. Assistant Professor, Department of History, University of Peshawar, Pakistan 1 Arnold J. Toynbee, „Impressions of Afghanistan and Pakistan‟s North-West Frontier: In Relation to the Communist World,‟International Affairs, 37, No. 2 (April 1961), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Afghanistan-Pakistan Wars, 2008–2009: Micro-Geographies, Conflict Diffusion, and Clusters of Violence
    The Afghanistan-Pakistan Wars, 2008–2009: Micro-geographies, Conflict Diffusion, and Clusters of Violence John O’Loughlin, Frank D. W. Witmer, and Andrew M. Linke1 Abstract: A team of political geographers analyzes over 5,000 violent events collected from media reports for the Afghanistan and Pakistan conflicts during 2008 and 2009. The violent events are geocoded to precise locations and the authors employ an exploratory spatial data analysis approach to examine the recent dynamics of the wars. By mapping the violence and examining its temporal dimensions, the authors explain its diffusion from traditional foci along the border between the two countries. While violence is still overwhelmingly concentrated in the Pashtun regions in both countries, recent policy shifts by the American and Pakistani gov- ernments in the conduct of the war are reflected in a sizeable increase in overall violence and its geographic spread to key cities. The authors identify and map the clusters (hotspots) of con- flict where the violence is significantly higher than expected and examine their shifts over the two-year period. Special attention is paid to the targeting strategy of drone missile strikes and the increase in their number and geographic extent by the Obama administration. Journal of Economic Literature, Classification Numbers: H560, H770, O180. 15 figures, 1 table, 113 ref- erences. Key words: Afghanistan, Pakistan, Taliban, ­­Al- Qaeda, insurgency, Islamic terrorism, U.S. military, International Security Assistance Forces, Durand Line, Tribal Areas, Northwest Frontier Province, ACLED, NATO. merica’s “longest war” is now (August 2010) nearing its ninth anniversary. It was Alaunched in October 2001 as a “war of necessity” (Barack Obama, August 17, 2009) to remove the Taliban from power in Afghanistan, and thus remove the support of this regime for Al-Qaeda, the terrorist organization that carried out the September 2001 attacks in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Sense of Daesh in Afghanistan: a Social Movement Perspective
    \ WORKING PAPER 6\ 2017 Making sense of Daesh in Afghanistan: A social movement perspective Katja Mielke \ BICC Nick Miszak \ TLO Joint publication by \ WORKING PAPER 6 \ 2017 MAKING SENSE OF DAESH IN AFGHANISTAN: A SOCIAL MOVEMENT PERSPECTIVE \ K. MIELKE & N. MISZAK SUMMARY So-called Islamic State (IS or Daesh) in Iraq and Syria is widely interpreted as a terrorist phenomenon. The proclamation in late January 2015 of a Wilayat Kho- rasan, which includes Afghanistan and Pakistan, as an IS branch is commonly interpreted as a manifestation of Daesh's global ambition to erect an Islamic caliphate. Its expansion implies hierarchical order, command structures and financial flows as well as a transnational mobility of fighters, arms and recruits between Syria and Iraq, on the one hand, and Afghanistan–Pakistan, on the other. In this Working Paper, we take a (new) social movement perspective to investigate the processes and underlying dynamics of Daesh’s emergence in different parts of the country. By employing social movement concepts, such as opportunity structures, coalition-building, resource mobilization and framing, we disentangle the different types of resource mobilization and long-term conflicts that have merged into the phenomenon of Daesh in Afghanistan. In dialogue with other approaches to terrorism studies as well as peace, civil war and security studies, our analysis focuses on relations and interactions among various actors in the Afghan-Pakistan region and their translocal networks. The insight builds on a ten-month fieldwork-based research project conducted in four regions—east, west, north-east and north Afghanistan—during 2016. We find that Daesh in Afghanistan is a context-specific phenomenon that manifests differently in the various regions across the country and is embedded in a long- term transformation of the religious, cultural and political landscape in the cross-border region of Afghanistan–Pakistan.
    [Show full text]
  • “Poppy Free” Provinces: a Measure Or a Target?
    Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit Case Study Series WATER MANAGEMENT, LIVESTOCK AND THE OPIUM ECONOMY “Poppy Free” Provinces: A Measure or a Target? This report is one of seven multi-site case studies undertaken during the second stage of AREU’s three-year study “Applied Thematic Research into Water Management, Livestock and the Opium Economy” (WOL). David Mansfield Funding for this research was provided by the European Commission. May 2009 Editor: Emily Winterbotham Layout: AREU Publications Team © 2009 Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, recording or otherwise without prior written permission of the publisher, the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. Permission can be obtained by emailing [email protected] or by calling (+93)(0)799 608 548. “Poppy Free” Provinces: A Measure or a Target? About the Author David Mansfield is a specialist on development in drugs-producing environments. He has spent 17 years working in coca- and opium-producing countries, with over ten years experience conducting research into the role of opium in rural livelihood strategies in Afghanistan. About the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit The Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU) is an independent research organisation based in Kabul. AREU’s mission is to conduct high-quality research that informs and influences policy and practice. AREU also actively promotes a culture of research and learning by strengthening analytical capacity in Afghanistan and facilitating reflection and debate. Fundamental to AREU’s vision is that its work should improve Afghan lives.
    [Show full text]
  • AFGHANISTAN South
    AFGHANISTAN Weekly Humanitarian Update (25 – 31 January 2021) KEY FIGURES IDPs IN 2021 (AS OF 31 JANUARY) 3,430 People displaced by conflict (verified) 35,610 Received assistance (including 2020 caseload) NATURAL DISASTERS IN 2020 (AS OF 31 JANUARY) 104,470 Number of people affected by natural disasters Conflict incident UNDOCUMENTED RETURNEES Internal displacement IN 2021 (AS OF 21 JANUARY) 36,496 Disruption of services Returnees from Iran 367 Returnees from Pakistan 0 South: Hundreds of people displaced by ongoing Returnees from other countries fighting in Kandahar province HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE Fighting between Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) and a non-state armed PLAN (HRP) REQUIREMENTS & group (NSAG) continued in Hilmand, Kandahar and Uruzgan provinces. FUNDING In Kandahar, fighting continued mainly in Arghandab, Zheray and Panjwayi 1.28B districts. Ongoing fighting displaced hundreds of people in Kandahar province, but Requirements (US$) – HRP the exact number of internally displaced persons (IDPs) is yet to be confirmed. 2021 Humanitarian actors with coordination of provincial authorities are assessing the needs of IDPs and will provide them with immediate assistance. Farmers and 37.8M agricultural activities continued to be affected by ongoing fighting. All movements 3% funded (US$) in 2021 on the main highway-1 connecting Hilmand to Kandahar provinces reportedly AFGHANISTAN resumed, however improvised explosive devices (IEDs) along the highway HUMANITARIAN FUND (AHF) continue to pose a threat. 2021 In Uruzgan province, clashes between ANSF and an NSAG continued along with the threat of IED attacks in Dehrawud, Gizab and Tirinkot districts. Two civilians 5.72M were reportedly killed and eight others wounded by an IED detonation in Tirinkot Contributions (US$) district.
    [Show full text]
  • 19 October 2020 "Generated on Refers to the Date on Which the User Accessed the List and Not the Last Date of Substantive Update to the List
    Res. 1988 (2011) List The List established and maintained pursuant to Security Council res. 1988 (2011) Generated on: 19 October 2020 "Generated on refers to the date on which the user accessed the list and not the last date of substantive update to the list. Information on the substantive list updates are provided on the Council / Committee’s website." Composition of the List The list consists of the two sections specified below: A. Individuals B. Entities and other groups Information about de-listing may be found at: https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/ombudsperson (for res. 1267) https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/sanctions/delisting (for other Committees) https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/content/2231/list (for res. 2231) A. Individuals TAi.155 Name: 1: ABDUL AZIZ 2: ABBASIN 3: na 4: na ﻋﺒﺪ اﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﻋﺒﺎﺳﯿﻦ :(Name (original script Title: na Designation: na DOB: 1969 POB: Sheykhan Village, Pirkowti Area, Orgun District, Paktika Province, Afghanistan Good quality a.k.a.: Abdul Aziz Mahsud Low quality a.k.a.: na Nationality: na Passport no: na National identification no: na Address: na Listed on: 4 Oct. 2011 (amended on 22 Apr. 2013) Other information: Key commander in the Haqqani Network (TAe.012) under Sirajuddin Jallaloudine Haqqani (TAi.144). Taliban Shadow Governor for Orgun District, Paktika Province as of early 2010. Operated a training camp for non- Afghan fighters in Paktika Province. Has been involved in the transport of weapons to Afghanistan. INTERPOL- UN Security Council Special Notice web link: https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we-work/Notices/View-UN-Notices- Individuals click here TAi.121 Name: 1: AZIZIRAHMAN 2: ABDUL AHAD 3: na 4: na ﻋﺰﯾﺰ اﻟﺮﺣﻤﺎن ﻋﺒﺪ اﻻﺣﺪ :(Name (original script Title: Mr Designation: Third Secretary, Taliban Embassy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates DOB: 1972 POB: Shega District, Kandahar Province, Afghanistan Good quality a.k.a.: na Low quality a.k.a.: na Nationality: Afghanistan Passport no: na National identification no: Afghan national identification card (tazkira) number 44323 na Address: na Listed on: 25 Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • EASO Country of Origin Information Report Pakistan Security Situation
    European Asylum Support Office EASO Country of Origin Information Report Pakistan Security Situation October 2018 SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION European Asylum Support Office EASO Country of Origin Information Report Pakistan Security Situation October 2018 More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). ISBN: 978-92-9476-319-8 doi: 10.2847/639900 © European Asylum Support Office 2018 Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, unless otherwise stated. For third-party materials reproduced in this publication, reference is made to the copyrights statements of the respective third parties. Cover photo: FATA Faces FATA Voices, © FATA Reforms, url, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 Neither EASO nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained herein. EASO COI REPORT PAKISTAN: SECURITY SITUATION — 3 Acknowledgements EASO would like to acknowledge the Belgian Center for Documentation and Research (Cedoca) in the Office of the Commissioner General for Refugees and Stateless Persons, as the drafter of this report. Furthermore, the following national asylum and migration departments have contributed by reviewing the report: The Netherlands, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Office for Country Information and Language Analysis Hungary, Office of Immigration and Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Office Documentation Centre Slovakia, Migration Office, Department of Documentation and Foreign Cooperation Sweden, Migration Agency, Lifos
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan Security Situation in Nangarhar Province
    Report Afghanistan: The security situation in Nangarhar province Translation provided by the Office of the Commissioner General for Refugees and Stateless Persons, Belgium. Report Afghanistan: The security situation in Nangarhar province LANDINFO – 13 OCTOBER 2016 1 About Landinfo’s reports The Norwegian Country of Origin Information Centre, Landinfo, is an independent body within the Norwegian Immigration Authorities. Landinfo provides country of origin information to the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration (Utlendingsdirektoratet – UDI), the Immigration Appeals Board (Utlendingsnemnda – UNE) and the Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Public Security. Reports produced by Landinfo are based on information from carefully selected sources. The information is researched and evaluated in accordance with common methodology for processing COI and Landinfo’s internal guidelines on source and information analysis. To ensure balanced reports, efforts are made to obtain information from a wide range of sources. Many of our reports draw on findings and interviews conducted on fact-finding missions. All sources used are referenced. Sources hesitant to provide information to be cited in a public report have retained anonymity. The reports do not provide exhaustive overviews of topics or themes, but cover aspects relevant for the processing of asylum and residency cases. Country of origin information presented in Landinfo’s reports does not contain policy recommendations nor does it reflect official Norwegian views. © Landinfo 2017 The material in this report is covered by copyright law. Any reproduction or publication of this report or any extract thereof other than as permitted by current Norwegian copyright law requires the explicit written consent of Landinfo. For information on all of the reports published by Landinfo, please contact: Landinfo Country of Origin Information Centre Storgata 33A P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghan Opiate Trade 2009.Indb
    ADDICTION, CRIME AND INSURGENCY The transnational threat of Afghan opium UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna ADDICTION, CRIME AND INSURGENCY The transnational threat of Afghan opium Copyright © United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), October 2009 Acknowledgements This report was prepared by the UNODC Studies and Threat Analysis Section (STAS), in the framework of the UNODC Trends Monitoring and Analysis Programme/Afghan Opiate Trade sub-Programme, and with the collaboration of the UNODC Country Office in Afghanistan and the UNODC Regional Office for Central Asia. UNODC field offices for East Asia and the Pacific, the Middle East and North Africa, Pakistan, the Russian Federation, Southern Africa, South Asia and South Eastern Europe also provided feedback and support. A number of UNODC colleagues gave valuable inputs and comments, including, in particular, Thomas Pietschmann (Statistics and Surveys Section) who reviewed all the opiate statistics and flow estimates presented in this report. UNODC is grateful to the national and international institutions which shared their knowledge and data with the report team, including, in particular, the Anti Narcotics Force of Pakistan, the Afghan Border Police, the Counter Narcotics Police of Afghanistan and the World Customs Organization. Thanks also go to the staff of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan and of the United Nations Department of Safety and Security, Afghanistan. Report Team Research and report preparation: Hakan Demirbüken (Lead researcher, Afghan
    [Show full text]
  • (FUCP) Structure Planning for Ghalanai (Mohmand Agency) FINAL STRUCTURE PLAN September, 2015
    Tribal Areas Rural-to- Urban Centres Conversion Initiative (TARUCCI) FATA URBAN CENTERS PROJECT (FUCP) Structure Planning For Ghalanai (Mohmand Agency) FINAL STRUCTURE PLAN September, 2015 CREATIVE ENGINEERING IZHAR & ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS CONSULTING 60-Street 3, E1, Phase 1 160-Cavalry Ground, Hayatabad Peshawar Street 4, Lahore Cantt Telephone# 091-5822184 Telephone# 042-36686449 Cell# 03005863060 Cell# 0321-4469322 EMail: [email protected] EMail: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................................................................................................. I LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................... V LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................ V LIST OF MAPS ..................................................................................................................................... VI LIST OF GRAPHS ................................................................................................................................. VI 1. PREFACE........................................................................................................................................... 1 2. METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 DIGITISED BASE MAPS
    [Show full text]
  • Afghan Narcotrafficking Finding an Alternative to Alternative Development Afghan Narcotrafficking Finding an Alternative to Alternative Development
    Afghan Narcotrafficking Finding an Alternative to Alternative Development Afghan Narcotrafficking Finding an Alternative to Alternative Development Joint U.S.-Russia Working Group on Afghan Narcotrafficking July 2016 A young boy helping with the final irrigation of the opium poppy season in Dawlat Yar district, Ghor province. Principal Author: David Mansfield Independent Consultant Contributors: Ilnur Batyrshin Former Head (July 2010 – May 2016), Scientific Research Center, Russian Federal Drug Control Service (FSKN) George Gavrilis Visiting Scholar, Institute for Religion, Culture and Public Life (IRCPL), Columbia University Author of The Dynamics of Interstate Boundaries Vladimir Ivanov Director, Branch in the Russian Federation, EastWest Institute Oleg V. Kulakov Professor of Area Studies, Military University, Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation Marlene Laruelle Research Professor of International Affairs, The George Washington University’s Elliott School of International Affairs Director, Central Asia Program, Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies, The George Washington University’s Elliott School of International Affairs Austin Long Assistant Professor, School of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University Ivan Safranchuk Associate Professor, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO) Editor in Chief, Great Game: Politics, Business, Security in Central Asia Konstantin Sorokin Adviser, Department of Education and Science, International Training and Methodology Centre for Financial Monitoring
    [Show full text]