EASO Country of Origin Information Report Pakistan Security Situation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EASO Country of Origin Information Report Pakistan Security Situation European Asylum Support Office EASO Country of Origin Information Report Pakistan Security Situation October 2018 SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION European Asylum Support Office EASO Country of Origin Information Report Pakistan Security Situation October 2018 More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). ISBN: 978-92-9476-319-8 doi: 10.2847/639900 © European Asylum Support Office 2018 Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, unless otherwise stated. For third-party materials reproduced in this publication, reference is made to the copyrights statements of the respective third parties. Cover photo: FATA Faces FATA Voices, © FATA Reforms, url, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 Neither EASO nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained herein. EASO COI REPORT PAKISTAN: SECURITY SITUATION — 3 Acknowledgements EASO would like to acknowledge the Belgian Center for Documentation and Research (Cedoca) in the Office of the Commissioner General for Refugees and Stateless Persons, as the drafter of this report. Furthermore, the following national asylum and migration departments have contributed by reviewing the report: The Netherlands, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Office for Country Information and Language Analysis Hungary, Office of Immigration and Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Office Documentation Centre Slovakia, Migration Office, Department of Documentation and Foreign Cooperation Sweden, Migration Agency, Lifos – Centre for Country of Origin Information and Analysis Reference is made to the Disclaimer regarding the responsibility of reviewers. 4 — EASO COUNTRY OF ORIGIN REPORT PAKISTAN: SECURITY SITUATION Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... 3 Contents ................................................................................................................................ 4 Disclaimer .............................................................................................................................. 5 Glossary and Abbreviations .................................................................................................. 6 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 11 Map ..................................................................................................................................... 14 1. General description of the security situation in Pakistan ................................................... 15 1.1. Overview of recent conflicts in Pakistan ...................................................................... 15 1.1.1. Militant violence and government response ........................................................ 15 1.1.2. Ethnic and sectarian violence ............................................................................... 17 1.1.3. Recent political developments ............................................................................. 17 1.1.4. International context ............................................................................................ 19 1.2. Actors in the conflict .................................................................................................... 20 1.2.1. State armed forces ................................................................................................ 20 1.2.2. Armed Groups ....................................................................................................... 22 1.3. Recent security trends and armed confrontations ...................................................... 32 1.3.1. Security operations and armed clashes ................................................................ 33 1.3.2. Attacks by militant groups .................................................................................... 35 1.3.3. Sectarian-related violence .................................................................................... 37 1.3.4. Ethnic and political violence ................................................................................. 37 1.3.5. Border attacks ....................................................................................................... 37 1.3.6. Drone strikes ......................................................................................................... 38 1.3.7. Violence in the run-up to the general elections ................................................... 39 1.4. Impact of the violence on the civilian population ....................................................... 40 1.4.1. Figures on civilian casualties ................................................................................. 40 1.4.2. Children ................................................................................................................. 45 1.4.3. Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) and refugees ................................................ 46 1.5. State ability to secure law and order ........................................................................... 47 1.5.1. State protection, security forces and justice ........................................................ 48 1.5.2. Anti-Terrorism Acts ............................................................................................... 50 1.5.3. Detention and death penalty ................................................................................ 51 2.1. Geographical overview of the violence 2017 – first half of 2018 ................................ 53 2.1.1. Trends in regional violence ................................................................................... 53 2.1.2. Regional comparison of violence-related fatalities .............................................. 55 2.2. Security trends per geographic subdivision ................................................................. 57 2.2.1. Punjab ................................................................................................................... 57 2.2.2. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa ............................................................................................ 61 2.2.3. Balochistan ............................................................................................................ 65 2.2.4. Sindh ..................................................................................................................... 70 2.2.5. Federally Administered Tribal Areas ..................................................................... 74 2.2.6. Islamabad Capital Territory .................................................................................. 84 2.2.7. Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan ......................................................................... 86 Annex I: Bibliography .......................................................................................................... 89 Annex II: Terms of Reference ............................................................................................ 120 EASO COI REPORT PAKISTAN: SECURITY SITUATION — 5 Disclaimer This report was written according to the EASO COI Report Methodology (2012) (1). The report is based on carefully selected sources of information. All sources used are referenced. To the extent possible and unless otherwise stated, all information presented, except for undisputed or obvious facts, has been cross-checked. The information contained in this report has been researched, evaluated and analysed with utmost care. However, this document does not claim to be exhaustive. If a particular event, person or organisation is not mentioned in the report, this does not mean that the event has not taken place or that the person or organisation does not exist. Furthermore, this report is not conclusive as to the determination or merit of any particular application for international protection. Terminology used should not be regarded as indicative of a particular legal position. ‘Refugee’, ‘risk’ and similar terminology are used as a generic terminology and not in the legal sense as applied in the EU Asylum Acquis, the 1951 Refugee Convention and the 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees. Neither EASO nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained in this report. The target users are asylum caseworkers, COI researchers, policymakers, and decision-making authorities. The drafting of this report was finalised in August 2018. Any event taking place after this date is not included in this report. More information on the reference period for this report can be found in the methodology section of the introduction. It must be noted that the review carried out by the mentioned departments, experts or organisations contributes to the overall quality of the report, but does not necessarily imply their formal endorsement of the final report, which is the full responsibility of EASO. (1) The EASO methodology is largely based on the Common EU Guidelines for processing Country of Origin Information (COI), 2008, and can be downloaded from the EASO website: https://www.easo.europa.eu/information-analysis/country-origin-information/coi-methodology-and-guides 6 — EASO COUNTRY OF ORIGIN REPORT PAKISTAN: SECURITY SITUATION Glossary and Abbreviations ACLED Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project Ah-le Sunnat Wal Jama’at Political Sunni Deobandi organisation,
Recommended publications
  • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa - Daily Flood Report Date (29 09 2011)
    Khyber Pakhtunkhwa - Daily Flood Report Date (29 09 2011) SWAT RIVER Boundary 14000 Out Flow (Cusecs) 12000 International 10000 8000 1 3 5 Provincial/FATA 6000 2 1 0 8 7 0 4000 7 2 4 0 0 2 0 3 6 2000 5 District/Agency 4 4 Chitral 0 Gilgit-Baltistan )" Gauge Location r ive Swat River l R itra Ch Kabul River Indus River KABUL RIVER 12000 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Kurram River 10000 Out Flow (Cusecs) Kohistan 8000 Swat 0 Dir Upper Nelam River 0 0 Afghanistan 6000 r 2 0 e 0 v 0 i 1 9 4000 4 6 0 R # 9 9 5 2 2 3 6 a Dam r 3 1 3 7 0 7 3 2000 o 0 0 4 3 7 3 1 1 1 k j n ") $1 0 a Headworks P r e iv Shangla Dir L")ower R t a ¥ Barrage w Battagram S " Man")sehra Lake ") r $1 Amandara e v Palai i R Malakand # r r i e a n Buner iv h J a R n ") i p n Munda n l a u Disputed Areas a r d i S K i K ") K INDUS RIVER $1 h Mardan ia ") ") 100000 li ") Warsak Adezai ") Tarbela Out Flow (Cusecs) ") 80000 ") C")harsada # ") # Map Doc Name: 0 Naguman ") ") Swabi Abbottabad 60000 0 0 Budni ") Haripur iMMAP_PAK_KP Daily Flood Report_v01_29092011 0 0 ") 2 #Ghazi 1 40000 3 Peshawar Kabal River 9 ") r 5 wa 0 0 7 4 7 Kh 6 7 1 6 a 20000 ar Nowshera ") Khanpur r Creation Date: 29-09-2011 6 4 5 4 5 B e Riv AJK ro Projection/Datum: GCS_WGS_1984/ D_WGS_1984 0 Ghazi 2 ") #Ha # Web Resources: http://www.immap.org Isamabad Nominal Scale at A4 paper size: 1:3,500,000 #") FATA r 0 25 50 100 Kilometers Tanda e iv Kohat Kohat Toi R s Hangu u d ") In K ai Map data source(s): tu Riv ") er Punjab Hydrology Irrigation Division Peshawar Gov: KP Kurram Garhi Karak Flood Cell , UNOCHA RIVER $1") Baran " Disclaimers: KURRAM RIVER G a m ") The designations employed and the presentation of b e ¥ Kalabagh 600 Bannu la material on this map do not imply the expression of any R K Out Flow (Cusecs) iv u e r opinion whatsoever on the part of the NDMA, PDMA or r ra m iMMAP concerning the legal status of any country, R ") iv ") e K territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning 400 r h ") ia the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Of' Intermediate &
    BOARD OF' INTERMEDIATE & SECONDARY EDUCATION PESHAWAR Research & Development/ Academic & Regulatory Authority Ph:091-9218012 Email : [email protected] The Competent Authority, Chairman BISE, Peshawar has been pleased to establish new camp office at Govt. High School Badaber Peshawar to facilitate the students / Private & Public Institutions / Public of followins areas: S.NO AREANAME S.NO AREANAME 1. Badaber 11. Aza Khel Mattani z. Masho Khel 12. Muyamzai 3. Mashogagar lJ. Tela Band A Shiekh Muhammad t4. Nak Band 5. Kaga wala 15. Darwazsai Mattani o" Ahmad Khle Bazid Khel 16. Sherikera 7. ZangalilMer a Masho gagar 17. Jaffar Klan Killi Kala Khel) 8. Adezai 18. Mian Garhi Sherikera o Yousaf Khel Mattani 19. Surizai Bala./Payan F.R Peshawar area i.e Sra Dargai, 10. Pasani Mattani 20. Kandow. Faridi. Bora and Ali Khel. Prof: Dr. Muhammad Shafi Afridi (CHAIRMAN) Endst No.663/DRD,tsISE. Peshawar Dated the. BISEP I 1!' June. 2014 Conv forwarded to the:- l. District Education Officer (Male/Female) Peshawar. 2. Agency Education Officer F.R Peshawar. 3. Principal GHS Badaber with the request to make necessary arrangement for distribution ofCheques, admission forms & other documents related to SSC/HSSC Examination. It is further requested to collect all documents related to Examination, Cheques etc from Principal GHSS No. 2 Peshawar cantt. 4. Principal GHSS No.2 Peshawar cantt is requested to hand over all record mentioned in S.No.3 to Principal GHS Badaber Peshawar. 5. Deputy Controller of Examination BISE, Peshawar. 6. Secrecy Officer SSC/HSSC BISE, Peshawar. 7. Assistant Controller of Examination SSC/HSSC BISE, Peshawar.
    [Show full text]
  • “TELLING the STORY” Sources of Tension in Afghanistan & Pakistan: a Regional Perspective (2011-2016)
    “TELLING THE STORY” Sources of Tension in Afghanistan & Pakistan: A Regional Perspective (2011-2016) Emma Hooper (ed.) This monograph has been produced with the financial assistance of the Norway Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Its contents are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not reflect the position of the Ministry. © 2016 CIDOB This monograph has been produced with the financial assistance of the Norway Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Its contents are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not reflect the position of the Ministry. CIDOB edicions Elisabets, 12 08001 Barcelona Tel.: 933 026 495 www.cidob.org [email protected] D.L.: B 17561 - 2016 Barcelona, September 2016 CONTENTS CONTRIBUTOR BIOGRAPHIES 5 FOREWORD 11 Tine Mørch Smith INTRODUCTION 13 Emma Hooper CHAPTER ONE: MAPPING THE SOURCES OF TENSION WITH REGIONAL DIMENSIONS 17 Sources of Tension in Afghanistan & Pakistan: A Regional Perspective .......... 19 Zahid Hussain Mapping the Sources of Tension and the Interests of Regional Powers in Afghanistan and Pakistan ............................................................................................. 35 Emma Hooper & Juan Garrigues CHAPTER TWO: KEY PHENOMENA: THE TALIBAN, REFUGEES , & THE BRAIN DRAIN, GOVERNANCE 57 THE TALIBAN Preamble: Third Party Roles and Insurgencies in South Asia ............................... 61 Moeed Yusuf The Pakistan Taliban Movement: An Appraisal ......................................................... 65 Michael Semple The Taliban Movement in Afghanistan .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Old Habits, New Consequences Old Habits, New Khalid Homayun Consequences Nadiri Pakistan’S Posture Toward Afghanistan Since 2001
    Old Habits, New Consequences Old Habits, New Khalid Homayun Consequences Nadiri Pakistan’s Posture toward Afghanistan since 2001 Since the terrorist at- tacks of September 11, 2001, Pakistan has pursued a seemingly incongruous course of action in Afghanistan. It has participated in the U.S. and interna- tional intervention in Afghanistan both by allying itself with the military cam- paign against the Afghan Taliban and al-Qaida and by serving as the primary transit route for international military forces and matériel into Afghanistan.1 At the same time, the Pakistani security establishment has permitted much of the Afghan Taliban’s political leadership and many of its military command- ers to visit or reside in Pakistani urban centers. Why has Pakistan adopted this posture of Afghan Taliban accommodation despite its nominal participa- tion in the Afghanistan intervention and its public commitment to peace and stability in Afghanistan?2 This incongruence is all the more puzzling in light of the expansion of insurgent violence directed against Islamabad by the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), a coalition of militant organizations that are independent of the Afghan Taliban but that nonetheless possess social and po- litical links with Afghan cadres of the Taliban movement. With violence against Pakistan growing increasingly indiscriminate and costly, it remains un- clear why Islamabad has opted to accommodate the Afghan Taliban through- out the post-2001 period. Despite a considerable body of academic and journalistic literature on Pakistan’s relationship with Afghanistan since 2001, the subject of Pakistani accommodation of the Afghan Taliban remains largely unaddressed. Much of the existing literature identiªes Pakistan’s security competition with India as the exclusive or predominant driver of Pakistani policy vis-à-vis the Afghan Khalid Homayun Nadiri is a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Conteporarary Counter Terrorim in Pakistan and Its Efficacy
    South Asian Studies A Research Journal of South Asian Studies Vol. 34, No. 1, January – June, 2019, pp. 103 – 123 Conteporarary Counter Terrorim in Pakistan and its Efficacy. Sanwal Hussain Kharl China University of Geosciences, China. Khizar Abbass Bhatti China University of Geosciences, China. Khalid Manzoor Butt Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan. Xiaoqing Xie China University of Geosciences, China. ABSTRACT The study aims to express counter-terrorism situation in Pakistan where terrorism has prevailed in last two decades. There have been more than 100,000 fatalities, the government bears 126 billion US dollars financially, 92 billion US dollars in terms of indirect losses and overall an estimated 10 million people nationally are affected by terrorism. NACTA was formed under National Action Plan to counter terrorism, it was the first step toward concrete anti-terrorism policy. This secondary data based qualitative research highlights efficacy of counter- terrorism policies. The results show the strengths and weaknesses of NACTA framework and its performance. The counter- terrorism strategies minimized security threats demonstrating considerable decrease in numbers of suicide attacks and violent activities. Key Words: Counter-Terrorism, NACTA, SWOT Analysis, Effectiveness Introduction Terrorism has been highly destructive phenomenon for last two decades, especially after 9/11 attacks and Pakistan‟s joining the „War on Terror‟. Approximately 100,000 non-combatant Pakistanis were killed by terrorists in post 9/11 era. According to the government analysis, the direct and indirect economic costs of terrorism up to 2017 have now surpassed $126 billion whereas the other economic loses from the „War on Terror‟ totaled $7543 million between 2016-18 (see Table.1).
    [Show full text]
  • CRSS Annual Security Report 2017
    CRSS Annual Security Report 2017 Author: Muhammad Nafees Editor: Zeeshan Salahuddin Table of Contents Table of Contents ___________________________________ 3 Acronyms __________________________________________ 4 Executive Summary __________________________________ 6 Fatalities from Violence in Pakistan _____________________ 8 Victims of Violence in Pakistan________________________ 16 Fatalities of Civilians ................................................................ 16 Fatalities of Security Officials .................................................. 24 Fatalities of Militants, Insurgents and Criminals .................. 26 Nature and Methods of Violence Used _________________ 29 Key militants, criminals, politicians, foreign agents, and others arrested in 2017 ___________________________ 32 Regional Breakdown ________________________________ 33 Balochistan ................................................................................ 33 Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) ......................... 38 Khyber Pukhtunkhwa (KP) ....................................................... 42 Punjab ........................................................................................ 47 Sindh .......................................................................................... 52 Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK), Islamabad, and Gilgit Baltistan (GB) ............................................................................ 59 Sectarian Violence .................................................................... 59 3 © Center
    [Show full text]
  • Baloch Insurgency and Its Impact on CPEC Jaleel, Sabahat and Bibi, Nazia
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Baloch Insurgency and its impact on CPEC jaleel, Sabahat and Bibi, Nazia University of Engineering and technology, Taxila, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad 18 July 2017 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/90135/ MPRA Paper No. 90135, posted 24 Nov 2018 17:28 UTC Baloch Insurgency and its impact on CPEC Sabahat Jaleel (Lecturer UET Taxila) & Nazia Bibi (Assistant Professor PIDE) Abstract CPEC, a significant development project, aims to connect Pakistan and China through highways, oil and gas pipelines, railways and an optical fiber link all the way from Gwadar to Xinjiang. Being the biggest venture in the bilateral ties of China-Pakistan, the project faces certain undermining factors. The research explores the lingering security concerns that surfaced due to the destabilizing and separatist efforts of the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) and Baloch Liberation Front (BLF). It also elaborates the Chinese concerns and Pakistan efforts to address these concerns while assuming the hypothesis that a secure and stable environment is necessary to reap the fruits of this mega project. The work also answers some innovative questions thus helpful for the students of Economics, Pakistan history, politics, Internal Relations, Foreign Policy and for those who intend to read about China-Pakistan and their joint ventures as CPEC. The main objective of the study to empirically analyses the response of Baloch community. Graphical and empirical methods have been adopted to describe and analyze the facts and figures related to the topic. The results clearly indicate that CPEC will face resistance from people of Balochistan, which will negatively affect the prospects of CPEC.
    [Show full text]
  • PAKISTAN: REGIONAL RIVALRIES, LOCAL IMPACTS Edited by Mona Kanwal Sheikh, Farzana Shaikh and Gareth Price DIIS REPORT 2012:12 DIIS REPORT
    DIIS REPORT 2012:12 DIIS REPORT PAKISTAN: REGIONAL RIVALRIES, LOCAL IMPACTS Edited by Mona Kanwal Sheikh, Farzana Shaikh and Gareth Price DIIS REPORT 2012:12 DIIS REPORT This report is published in collaboration with DIIS . DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES 1 DIIS REPORT 2012:12 © Copenhagen 2012, the author and DIIS Danish Institute for International Studies, DIIS Strandgade 56, DK-1401 Copenhagen, Denmark Ph: +45 32 69 87 87 Fax: +45 32 69 87 00 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.diis.dk Cover photo: Protesting Hazara Killings, Press Club, Islamabad, Pakistan, April 2012 © Mahvish Ahmad Layout and maps: Allan Lind Jørgensen, ALJ Design Printed in Denmark by Vesterkopi AS ISBN 978-87-7605-517-2 (pdf ) ISBN 978-87-7605-518-9 (print) Price: DKK 50.00 (VAT included) DIIS publications can be downloaded free of charge from www.diis.dk Hardcopies can be ordered at www.diis.dk Mona Kanwal Sheikh, ph.d., postdoc [email protected] 2 DIIS REPORT 2012:12 Contents Abstract 4 Acknowledgements 5 Pakistan – a stage for regional rivalry 7 The Baloch insurgency and geopolitics 25 Militant groups in FATA and regional rivalries 31 Domestic politics and regional tensions in Pakistan-administered Kashmir 39 Gilgit–Baltistan: sovereignty and territory 47 Punjab and Sindh: expanding frontiers of Jihadism 53 Urban Sindh: region, state and locality 61 3 DIIS REPORT 2012:12 Abstract What connects China to the challenges of separatism in Balochistan? Why is India important when it comes to water shortages in Pakistan? How does jihadism in Punjab and Sindh differ from religious militancy in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA)? Why do Iran and Saudi Arabia matter for the challenges faced by Pakistan in Gilgit–Baltistan? These are some of the questions that are raised and discussed in the analytical contributions of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Extremism Monitor
    Global Extremism Monitor Violent Islamist Extremism in 2017 WITH A FOREWORD BY TONY BLAIR SEPTEMBER 2018 1 2 Contents Foreword 7 Executive Summary 9 Key Findings About the Global Extremism Monitor The Way Forward Introduction 13 A Unifying Ideology Global Extremism Today The Long War Against Extremism A Plethora of Insurgencies Before 9/11 A Proliferation of Terrorism Since 9/11 The Scale of the Problem The Ten Deadliest Countries 23 Syria Iraq Afghanistan Somalia Nigeria Yemen Egypt Pakistan Libya Mali Civilians as Intended Targets 45 Extremist Groups and the Public Space Prominent Victims Breakdown of Public Targets Suicide Bombings 59 Use of Suicide Attacks by Group Female Suicide Bombers Executions 71 Deadliest Groups Accusations Appendices 83 Methodology Glossary About Us Notes 3 Countries Affected by Violent Islamist Extremism, 2017 4 5 6 Foreword Tony Blair One of the core objectives of the Institute is the promotion of co-existence across the boundaries of religious faith and the combating of extremism based on an abuse of faith. Part of this work is research into the phenomenon of extremism derived particularly from the abuse of Islam. This publication is the most comprehensive analysis of such extremism to date and utilises data on terrorism in a new way to show: 1. Violent extremism connected with the perversion of Islam today is global, affecting over 60 countries. 2. Now more than 120 different groups worldwide are actively engaged in this violence. 3. These groups are united by an ideology that shares certain traits and beliefs. 4. The ideology and the violence associated with it have been growing over a period of decades stretching back to the 1980s or further, closely correlated with the development of the Muslim Brotherhood into a global movement, the Iranian Revolution in 1979 and—in the same year—the storming by extremist insurgents of Islam’s holy city of Mecca.
    [Show full text]
  • Extremism and Terrorism
    Pakistan: Extremism and Terrorism On April 21, 2021, a car bomb exploded in the parking lot of the Serena Hotel in Quetta, killing at least five and wounding 11. Chinese ambassador to Pakistan Nong Rong was staying in the hotel but was not present during the attack. Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility. “It was a suicide attack in which our suicide bomber used his explosives-filled car in the hotel,” the TTP said in a text message to Reuters. (Sources: Reuters, Associated Press) On April 12, 2021, police in Lahore arrested Saad Rizvi, leader of the outlawed Islamist political party Tehreek-e-Labaik Pakistan (TLP). The arrest was reportedly to deter TLP supporters from further demanding the expulsion of France’s ambassador over the publication in France of cartoons featuring Islam’s Prophet Muhammad. Rizvi had claimed the government had reached an agreement with his party to expel the ambassador by April 20, while government officials claimed they agreed only to discuss the issue in parliament. In response to Rizvi’s arrest, TLP supporters blocked highways and clash with police across the country over the course of two days, killing at least four people and wounding dozens of others, including at least 60 police officers. On April 18, TLP supporters attacked a police station in Lahore while rallying in the city against Rizvi’s arrest. The protesters took hostage 11 officers. The protesters released the hostages the following day after negotiations with the government. Photos released of the hostages during the negotiations showed they had been tortured. (Sources: Voice of America, Associated Press) Overview Since its independence from British colonial rule in 1947, Pakistan has been divided along ethnic, religious, and sectarian lines, a condition which has been exploited by internal and external organizations to foster extremism and terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • Single Bench List for 01-01-2021(Friday)
    _ 1 _ PESHAWAR HIGH COURT, PESHAWAR DAILY LIST FOR FRIDAY, 01 JANUARY, 2021 BEFORE:- MR. JUSTICE MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM KHAN Court No: 6 MOTION CASES 1. Cr.M/Q 92- Waqar Shakeel Ahmad Khan Hashtnagri P/2020(model V/s (Charsadda) court (criminal)) State Cr Appeal Branch AG Office 2. CM Corr 405- Muhammad Iqbal Hussain Muhammad Riaz P/2020(in BA V/s 2517-P/2020) State & others Cr Appeal Branch AG Office 3. C.R 783-P/2020 Haji Abid Ullah Liaqat Ali Shinwari With CM No. V/s 1282-P/2020() Hayat Muhammad & others 4. CM 2427/2020 In Bakhtiar Ali Dilawar Khan, Mohib Jan Salarzai, W.P 4185-P/2017 V/s Muhammad Irshad Mohmand (Rent)(stay Noman ud Din alias Mehmood granted on Jan etc Marjan Ali Khan, Muhammad 03/11/2017) Daud Jan 5. CM 2431/2020 In Saif ullah Muhib Kakakhel Saifullah Muhib Kakakhel W.P 7516-P/2019() V/s Federation of Pakistan Asad Jan, Deputy Attorney General, Mian Zia ul Islam, Writ Petition Branch AG Office 6. CM 2447/2020 In Muhammad Tayyab Muhammad Farooq Afridi W.P 5294-P/2020() V/s Collector Customs Deputy Attorney General, Muhammad Jamil IT Branch Peshawar High Court Page 1 of 11 Video Link only available in Court # 1,2,3 and 4 _ 2 _ DAILY LIST FOR FRIDAY, 01 JANUARY, 2021 BEFORE:- MR. JUSTICE MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM KHAN Court No: 6 MOTION CASES 7. I/R In W.P 5719- Nawaz Khan Shakeel Ahmad Khan Hashtnagri P/2020() V/s (Charsadda) Mst Yasmeen Writ Petition Branch AG Office 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Daredevil39 Junior Member Thanks: 12 Thanked 48 Times in 19 Posts
    Saturday , Septemb er 20, 2014 05:10 PM (GMT Past CSP +5) Hom Beginner Rule Syllab Paper Membe e 's Guide s us s rs CSS Forums > CSS Compulsory Subjects > Current User Name User Name Remember Me? Affairs > Current Affairs Notes Password Log in Sucide attacks in Pakistan Since 2001 to Nov 2009 Home Register Awards Community Today's Posts Search Share Thread: Facebook Twitter Google+ LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread #1 Monday, December 14, 2009 Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Hyderabad Posts: 22 Daredevil39 Junior Member Thanks: 12 Thanked 48 Times in 19 Posts Sucide attacks in Pakistan Since 2001 to Nov 2009 Fidayeen (Suicide Squad) Attacks in Pakistan 2002 1 (March 17) Five persons were killed and more than 40 injured, including the High Commissioner of Sri Lanka to Pakistan, in a grenade attack on a church in Islamabad. 2 (May 8) Nine French nationals and five Pakistanis, including a suspected suicide bomber, are killed and 34 more injured in a bomb explosion inside a bus opposite Sheraton Hotel, Karachi. 2003 1 (July 4) 53 persons are killed and 57 others injured as three armed terrorists, including a suspected suicide bomber, attack a Shiite Muslim mosque in Quetta, capital of the Southwestern Baluchistan province, during the Friday prayers. 2 (December 25) 14 persons were killed and 46 others injured during a second assassination attempt on President Pervez Musharraf in the Jhanda Chichi area of Rawalpindi. The President narrowly escaped the suicide assassination attempt when his motorcade was hit by two explosive laden vehicles. Both the suicide bombers were also believed to have been killed in the incident.
    [Show full text]