Adaptation Policy and Practice in Nunavik (J
Ouranos’ Northern Environment Program
ROBERT SIRON
In collaboration with STÉPHANIE BLEAU and REBECCA HENNIGS
Kuujjuaq April 19, 2018 OURANOS’ SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMS
VULNERABILITIES, IMPACTS & ADAPTATION CLIMATE SCIENCES PRESENTATION OUTLINE
Northern Environment program Objectives and priorities 2014-2019 Ongoing projects Examples of cross-cutting projects The status of adaptation to climate change CC and science education in high schools Conclusion NORTHERN CHALLENGES IN THE FACE OF CLIMATE CHANGE OURANOS’ NORTHERN ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM (2014 - 2019)
Ecosystem integrity, cultural & natural Foster Identify and heritage knowledge prioritize transfer to insufficiently Sustainable infrastructure stakeholders covered issues
Population health & security Improve Support understanding decision-making of climate processes change and Economic activities adaptation
Climate risks in Food security and authorization processes resource management ONGOING PROJECTS (2017-2018)
ECOSYSTEM INTEGRITY Climate change and the tundra of Nunavik: exposure, sensitivity and vulnerability (D. Berteaux /UQAR) Mapping the impacts of climate change on salmonid habitat in Northern lakes of Quebec (Y. Gratton /INRS) Identifying vulnerable wetland ecosystems and plants of Eeyou Istchee James bay to CC (N. Fenton /UQAT)
POPULATION HEALTH & SECURITY Climate change and traditional food security in northern Quebec (M. Humphries /McGill) Modelling the future of arctic fox rabies dynamics and associated risk management (P. Leighton /UdeM)
SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE Quantitative risk of linear infrastructure on permafrost (ARQULUK Program) (G. Doré /U. Laval
CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES AVATIVUT : Environmental monitoring and science education in Nunavik’s schools (E. Lévesque /UQTR) Adaptation policy and practice in Nunavik (J. Ford /McGill)
Photo: Arquluk homepage Example of a cross-cutting project : ADAPTATION POLICY AND PRACTICE IN NUNAVIK (1) (J. Ford /McGill ; 2016-2017)
Create an adaptation baseline, i.e. reference point to understand the state of CC adaptation in Nunavik
Evaluate adaptation readiness, i.e. engagement, funding, etc.
Allow comparisons (same studies in Nunavut, Nunatsiavut)
Measure and asses adaptation progress and adequacy to inform adaptation strategy and fill the gaps Example of a cross-cutting project : ADAPTATION POLICY AND PRACTICE IN NUNAVIK (2) (J. Ford /McGill ; 2016-2017)
• Systematic review of information publically available on CC adaptation • Sources : scientific literature (articles), grey literature (reports, web sites, professional associations, networks) and interviews with key representatives • 675 discrete adaptation initiatives (2010 – 2017)
Assessment and rating of 7 readiness factors that are necessary for adaptation to occur
Use of interviews and ratings to find key linkages and barriers Example of a cross-cutting project : ADAPTATION POLICY AND PRACTICE IN NUNAVIK (3) (J. Ford /McGill ; 2016-2017)
HOW ? 60 % ground-work • Research & monitoring • Capacity building • Risk assessments
• Resource planning 27% Complete (finished)
Complete (ongoing) 40 % action 39% Indeterminate
• Policy initiatives Partially complete • Information sharing Planned 16% • Practice and behaviour Recommended
9% 3% 6%
Adaptation initiative status
Source: Shah and King (2017). State of Knowledge and Gap Analysis on Climate Change Adaptation in Nunavik, Ouranos Report to INAC. Example of a cross-cutting project : ADAPTATION POLICY AND PRACTICE IN NUNAVIK (4) (J. Ford /McGill ; 2016-2017)
WHERE ?
• Majority of initiatives implemented at national level • A quarter implemented at regional and community levels
Adaptation initiatives by community
Source: Shah and King (2017). State of Knowledge and Gap Analysis on Climate Change Adaptation in Nunavik, Ouranos Report to INAC. Example of a cross-cutting project : ADAPTATION POLICY AND PRACTICE IN NUNAVIK (5) (J. Ford /McGill ; 2016-2017)
160 2012: End of IPY 2007-2008 End of QC CCAP 2006-2012 Start of QC CCAP 2013-2020 WHEN ? 140
120
100 IPY
80
----March 31, 2017
Number Initiatives of Number 60
40
20
0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Gray Peer-reviewed Reporting Year
Number of discrete adaptation initiatives published by year (n=675)
Source: Shah and King (2017). State of Knowledge and Gap Analysis on Climate Change Adaptation in Nunavik, Ouranos Report to INAC. Example of a cross-cutting project : ADAPTATION POLICY AND PRACTICE IN NUNAVIK (6) (J. Ford /McGill ; 2016-2017)
WHO ?
• 60% initiatives involve Business & Economy 8% several stakeholders 3% Culture & Education 26% • 25% included traditional Health & Wellbeing knowledge 17% Hunting & Subsistence Harvesting • 3 most active sectors (63%) Indeterminate
7% Institutional & Resource 16% Management 3% Intersectoral
20% Infrastructure & Transportation
Sectors involved in adaptation initiatives
Source: Shah and King (2017). State of Knowledge and Gap Analysis on Climate Change Adaptation in Nunavik, Ouranos Report to INAC. Example of a cross-cutting project: AVATIVUT: ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND SCIENCE EDUCATION IN NUNAVIK’S SCHOOLS (E. Lévesque /UQTR with Kativik Llisarniliriniq, INRS-ETE and CEN /U. Laval)
To raise interest among students in natural sciences To contribute to building a long-term monitoring database on impacts of CC
1300 high school students in the 14 villages of Nunavik
Integrated into the S&T classes and adapted to Inuit culture and northern environment
Network of permanent plots and monitoring stations
Modules on ice, snow, permafrost and berry production
Bidirectional dialogue between different knowledge systems and generations
Improve awareness among residents of CC impacts
www.cen.ulaval.ca/avativut/ MINE RAGLAN CONCLUSION
What is coming up… 2018-2019: Continue to work on program priorities and less covered topics focussing on solutions rather than problems Program renewal to prepare the next phase (2019-2024), in collaboration with our partners (Ouranos program committees) New syntheses of knowledge on CC in 2019–2020: NRCan and Ouranos (Quebec-focus); with chapters on the North CONCLUSION
What is coming up… 2018-2019: Continue to work on program priorities and less covered topics focussing on solutions rather than problems Program renewal to prepare the next phase (2019-2024), in collaboration with our partners (Ouranos program committees) New syntheses of knowledge on CC in 2019–2020: NRCan and Ouranos (Quebec-focus); with chapters on the North
What we have learned Need for more collaboration between all actors: i.e. working together and for each other i.e., codesign of projects on impacts and adaptation… Making results more accessible to all ! Traditional knowledge (IQ) and Science: We need both systems to get the «big picture» on CC Observations and projections, past/present and future climate, adaptation at individual, local, regional scales Merci ! Nakurmik Thank you
[email protected] www.ouranos.ca www.ouranos.ca/en/program/northern-environment/