Melanoma Metastasis Suppression by Chromosome 6: Evidence for a Pathway Regulated by CRSP3 and TXNIP1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
[CANCER RESEARCH 63, 432–440, January 15, 2003] Melanoma Metastasis Suppression by Chromosome 6: Evidence for a Pathway Regulated by CRSP3 and TXNIP1 Steven F. Goldberg,2 Mary E. Miele, Naohito Hatta, Minoru Takata,3 Carrie Paquette-Straub, Leonard P. Freedman,4 and Danny R. Welch5 Jake Gittlen Cancer Research Institute, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033 [S. F. G., D. R. W.]; Department of Medical Technology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716 [M. E. M., C. P-S.]; The Penn State-National Foundation for Cancer Research Center for Metastasis Research, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033 [D. R. W.]; Department of Dermatology, Kanazawa University School of Medicine, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa, 920-8640 Japan [N. H., M. T.]; and Cell Biology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Sloan-Kettering Division, Joan and Sanford I. Weill Graduate School of Medical Sciences of Cornell University, New York, New York 10021 [L. P. F.] ABSTRACT We have shown that the MMCT6 of human chr6 into metastatic human melanoma cell lines C8161 or MelJuSo suppressed metastasis Loss of genetic material on chromosome 6 has been associated with without blocking tumor formation (4, 5). Metastasis-suppressed hy- progression of human melanomas. We showed previously that introducing brids of C8161 (neo6/C8161) were blocked at steps in the metastatic chromosome 6 into metastatic human melanoma cell lines suppresses metastasis without affecting the ability of the hybrids to form progres- cascade affecting the survival and proliferation at secondary sites (6). sively growing tumors. By subtractive hybridization comparing nonmeta- We used subtractive hybridization to identify a metastasis suppressor static chromosome 6-containing (neo6/C8161) versus parental (C8161) gene, KISS1, which mapped to 1q32 (7–10). Tumor cells transfected metastatic cells, the KISS1 metastasis suppressor gene was isolated. How- with KISS1 cDNA were nonmetastatic, but remained tumorigenic. ever, KISS1 mapped to chromosome 1q32. To identify upstream regula- MMCT of chr6 with a deletion (ϳ40 Mb) spanning 6q16.3-q23 tor(s) of (and downstream effectors of) KISS1, microarray hybridization (neo6qdel) did not suppresses metastasis (11). Because KISS1 was comparing C8161 and neo6/C8161 variants was performed. TXNIP/ cloned from C8161 cells, the genetic defect must be at the level of VDUP1, a thioredoxin-binding protein, was expressed more highly in KISS1 regulation, not in KISS1 itself. Also, because neo6qdel hybrids neo6/C8161 and in nonmetastatic melanomas. Increased TXNIP expres- did not express KISS1, the upstream regulator(s) of KISS1 was sion inhibited metastasis and up-regulated KISS1. Surprisingly, TXNIP mapped between 6q16.3-q23 (11). Shirasaki et al. verified this hy- also mapped to chromosome 1q. PCR karyotyping that refined the region on chromosome 6 identified CRSP3/DRIP130, a transcriptional coactiva- pothesis in melanoma clinical samples by showing loss of heterozy- tor, as a metastasis suppressor. CRSP3 transfectant cells had up-regulated gosity of markers in that region correlated with decreased KISS1 KISS1 and TXNIP expression and were suppressed for metastasis. Quan- expression (12). titative real-time reverse-transcription PCR of clinical melanoma samples KISS1 is a precursor for secreted neuropeptide ligands [designated showed that loss of CRSP3 expression correlated with decreased KISS1 Metastin (13) or Kisspeptins (14)] for a G-protein coupled [named expression and increased metastasis. Thus, we implicated a specific gene hOT7T175 (13), AXOR12 (15), or hGPR54 (14)]. Although on chromosome 6 in the etiology of melanoma metastasis and identified hOT7T175-transfected B16/BL6 melanoma-injected mice treated potential up-stream regulators of KISS1 and TXNIP. with Metastin developed fewer lung metastases (13), the mechanism of KISS1 suppression is still unknown. Recent publications suggest INTRODUCTION possible mechanisms for KISS1 metastasis suppression. Metastin induces Ca2ϩ in receptor-transfected CHO cells (13), as well as Metastasis is the culmination of neoplastic progression toward phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and weak phosphorylation of p38/MAPK autonomy from host regulation. Acquiring metastatic potential is but not of SAPK/JNK (14). Metastin inhibits motility, chemotaxis, apparently “driven” by genomic instability with coincident or super- and invasion in vitro (13, 16), possibly by repressing the transcription imposed selection pressures (1). To be metastatic, tumor cells must of MMP-9 [via induction of cytosolic IB␣ (17)]. Metastin also complete a sequential, multistep cascade involving complex interac- induces excessive formation of focal adhesions and stress fibers in tions between tumor and host. Cells must navigate a series of obsta- hOT7T175-transfected B16/BL6 and induces the phosphorylation of cles, including immune surveillance, loss of original tissue context, FAK and paxillin (13), possibly through Rho (14). invasion through the basement membrane, lymphatic or hematoge- The primary objective of the current study was to identify the nous circulation, extravasation, and growth at the secondary site. Any upstream regulator(s) of KiSS1 on chr6. Additionally, microarray cell shed from the primary neoplasm that fails to complete all requisite hybridizations using metastatic (C8161) and nonmetastatic (neo6/ steps cannot form metastases (2, 3). C8161) variants of a human melanoma cell line could be useful in identifying some additional downstream regulators of KISS1. Received 8/6/02; accepted 11/14/02. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. MATERIALS AND METHODS 1 Supported by NIH Grants CA66128 (to D. R. W.), CA87728 (to D. R. W.), and CA88876 (to M. E. M.); the National Foundation for Cancer Research (to D. R. W.); a Cell Lines and Culture. C8161 is a human melanoma cell line that metasta- Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C2-12670812) from the Japan Society for the sizes after orthotopic or i.v. injection into athymic mice (18). C8161.9 is a highly Promotion of Science (to N. H. and M. T.); a predoctoral fellowship from the Foreman metastatic subclone of C8161 (7). Nonmetastatic neo6/C8161.1, neo6/C8161.2, Foundation (to S. F. G. and D. R. W.); and the Jake Gittlen Memorial Golf Tournament (to D. R. W.). neo6/C8161.3, and neo6/C8161.6 were derived by MMCT using the 2 Present address: Laboratory of Biosystems and Cancer, National Cancer Institute, MCH262A1.D6 donor cell line (4). Metastatic neo6(del)(q16.3-q23)/C8161 hy- Building 37/Room 5046/MSC 4264, 37 Convent Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892. brids (neo6qdel/C8161.9.1, neo6qdel/C8161.9.2, neo6qdel/C8161.9.7, neo6qdel/ 3 Present address: Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, 2-2-78 Nishinagae, Toyama, 930-8550 Japan. 4 Present address: Department of Bone Biology, Merck Research Laboratories, 6 The abbreviations used are: MMCT, microcell-mediated chromosome transfer; chr, WP26A-1000, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486. chromosome; DME-F12, 1:1 mixture of DMEM and Ham’s F-12 medium; cDME-F12, 5 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Pathology, Uni- mixture of DME-F12 and 5% fetal bovine serum; CMF-DPBS, Ca2ϩ/Mg2ϩ-free Dulbec- versity of Alabama at Birmingham, 1670 University Boulevard, Volker Hall G-038, co’s PBS; TRX, thioredoxin; VGP, vertical growth phase; MTD, mean tumor diameter; Birmingham, AL 35294-0019. E-mail: [email protected]; Phone: (205) 934-2956; RT-PCR, reverse-transcription PCR; RTQ, quantitative real-time RT-PCR; FAM, 6- Fax: (205) 934-1775. carboxyfluorescein; TAMRA, 6-carboxy-tetramethyl-rhodamine. 432 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2003 American Association for Cancer Research. CRSP3/TXNIP/KISS1: METASTASIS SUPPRESSION PATHWAY C8161.9.8) were prepared using a related chr6 microcell donor variant (11). using a hemacytometer. Cell numbers were determined daily for 10 days. Presence and retention of the added chromosome was verified by PCR of single- Morphology was recorded using an inverted microscope (Nikon Diaphot) sequence-length polymorphisms, karyotyping, and/or fluorescence in situ hybrid- equipped with a digital camera (DC Viewer Version 3.2.0.0; Leica Microsys- ization (see corresponding references in 7, 11 and 18). tems, Ltd., Heerbrugg, Germany). C8161-derived cells were cultured in DME-F12 (Invitrogen) supplemented In Vivo Experiments. Female athymic mice 3–4 weeks of age (Harlan with 5% fetal bovine serum (Atlanta Biologicals, Atlanta, GA), 1% nonessen- Sprague Dawley, Madison, WI) were maintained under the NIH and The tial amino acids (Invitrogen), and cDME-F12, but no antibiotics or antimy- Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine guidelines. The Institu- cotics. Neomycin-resistant cells were maintained in cDME-F12 containing 500 tional Animal Care and Use Committee approved all protocols. Food and water g/ml of active G418 (Invitrogen). Cultures were maintained at 37°Cina were provided ad libitum. humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. None of the cultures were infected with For in vivo experiments, C8161.9/pcDNA3 (P6 and 16), neo6/C8161.2 Mycoplasma spp. according to the PCR-based TaKaRa Mycoplasma detection (P20–21), neo6/C8161.6 (P10), C8161.9/TXNIP (P4–5), and C8161.9/CRSP3 kit (Panvera, Madison, WI). Cells were detached using a solution of 2 mM (P4–7) were detached at 70–90% confluence,