Railway Power Supply System Models for Static Calculations in a Modular Design Implementation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Annual Report | 2018
Annual Report | 2018 A word from the CEO | This is Norconsult | Strategy 2019–2021 | Heads for tomorrow | Selected projects 2018 | Our market areas | Board of Directors’ Report for 2018 | Consolidated financial statements 5 326 Turnover (NOK, millions) Contents 6 000 5 000 4 000 3 000 2 000 A word from the CEO . 4 1 000 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 This is Norconsult Our business . 7 Corporate governance . 10 402 Strategy 2019–2021 . 12 Operating profit (NOK, millions) Heads for tomorrow #headsforrecruitment . 16 400 #headsforcareer . 18 #headsforsustainability . 21 300 #headsforresponsibility . 22 #headsforenvironment . 25 200 The little big differences 100 Selected projects 2018 . 28 Our market areas . 38 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Board of Directors’ Report for 2018 . 46 Consolidated financial statements . 62 3 800 Forretningsidé Employees 2018 3 800 2017 3 200 2016 3 050 2015 2 970 2014 2 900 Front page photos Photo 1: Havøygavlen Wind Power Plant . Photo 2: City Bridge in Flekkefjord . Photo: Southern Region of the Norwegian Public Roads Administration 2 Photo 3: Norconsult’s employees working at the VEAS facility . Photo: Johnny Syversen 3 A word from the CEO | This is Norconsult | Strategy 2019–2021 | Heads for tomorrow | Selected projects 2018 | Our market areas | Board of Directors’ Report for 2018 | Consolidated financial statements As “Norconsultants”, everything we do must contribute to little big differences A word from the CEO that create added value for our clients. Photo: Erik Burås 2018 was a hectic and good year for the acquisition of Arkitekthuset joint Ringerike Railway Line and E16 In addition, we have been selected as main topics for the 2019–2021 strategy must sharpen our ability to be in the Norconsult . -
Bewhuwcii U*& Osilt
BEWHUWCIi U*& OSiLt REPORT NO. FRA/0R&D-76/275.I % „ LOCOMOTIVE CAB DESIGN DEVELOPMENT Volume I: Analysis of Locomotive Cab Environment & Development of Cab Design Alternatives Jl J. Robinson D. Piccione G. Lamers Boeing Vertol Company P.O. Box 16858 Philadelphia PA 19142 ^A .ususa&j S'A1H O* OCTOBER 1976 INTERIM REPORT DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE TO THE U.S. PUBLIC THROUGH THE NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE. SPRiNOFIELO, VIRGINIA 22161 Prepared for U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION J Office of Research and Development Washington DC 20590 A NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Govern ment assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. 'C NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse pro ducts or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are con sidered essential to the object of this report. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient** Cafolog No. FRA/ORSD-76/275.I 4. Title and Subtitle S. Report Dole LOCOMOTIVE CAB DESIGN DEVELOPMENT October 1976 Volume I: Analysis of Locomotive Cab 6. Performing Orgonnotien Code Environment § Development of Cab Design Alternatives 8. Performing Orgonisotton Report No. Author's) Robinson, D. Piccione, G. Lamers DOT-TSC-FRA-76-22,I 9. Performing Orgcniiotion Nome and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Boeing Vertol Company* RR628T/R7341 11. Contract or Grant No. P.O. Box 16858 Philadelphia PA 19142 DOT-TSC-913-1 13. Type of Report ond Period Covered 12. -
Joint Barents Transport Plan Proposals for Development of Transport Corridors for Further Studies
Joint Barents Transport Plan Proposals for development of transport corridors for further studies September 2013 Front page photos: Kjetil Iversen, Rune N. Larsen and Sindre Skrede/NRK Table of Contents Table Summary 7 1 Introduction 12 1.1 Background 12 1.2 Objectives and members of the Expert Group 13 1.3 Mandate and tasks 14 1.4 Scope 14 1.5 Methodology 2 Transport objectives 15 2.1 National objectives 15 2.2 Expert Group’s objective 16 3 Key studies, work and projects of strategic importance 17 3.1 Multilateral agreements and forums for cooperation 17 3.2 Multilateral projects 18 3.4 National plans and studies 21 4 Barents Region – demography, climate and main industries 23 4.1 Area and population 23 4.2 Climate and environment 24 4.3 Overview of resources and key industries 25 4.4 Ores and minerals 25 4.5 Metal industry 27 4.6 Seafood industry 28 4.7 Forest industry 30 4.8 Petroleum industry 32 4.9 Tourism industry 35 4.10 Overall transport flows 37 4.11 Transport hubs 38 5 Main border-crossing corridors in the Barents Region 40 5.1 Corridor: “The Bothnian Corridor”: Oulu – Haparanda/Tornio - Umeå 44 5.2 Corridor: Luleå – Narvik 49 5.3 Corridor: Vorkuta – Syktyvkar – Kotlas – Arkhangelsk - Vartius – Oulu 54 5.4 Corridor: “The Northern Maritime Corridor”: Arkhangelsk – Murmansk – The European Cont. 57 5.5 Corridor: “The Motorway of the Baltic Sea”: Luleå/Kemi/Oulu – The European Continent 65 5.6 Corridor: Petrozavodsk – Murmansk – Kirkenes 68 5.7 Corridor: Kemi – Salla – Kandalaksha 72 5.8 Corridor: Kemi – Rovaniemi – Kirkenes 76 -
Railway Standard
Railway standard Possible extension of the ScanMed Corridor from the Mälardalen Task 5.3 Catching the goods transport from the northern areas to CNCs’ Responsible partner: Region Örebro County Version: Final draft, 2017-12-14 Lead Partner Content List of figures ........................................................................................................................................ 3 List of tables ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 7 2.1 TENTacle ................................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 Present situation .................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Objectives ............................................................................................................................ 10 2.4 Purpose ............................................................................................................................... -
A European Standard for Rail Fastenings for Heavy Axle Loads
A European Standard for Rail Fastenings for Heavy Axle Loads. David Rhodes, Technical Director, Pandrol Ltd., Station Road, Addlestone, KT15 2AR, UK (Convenor of CEN Working Group TC256/WG17) Presented at the International Heavy Haul Association Special Technical Session, Kiruna, Sweden, June 2007 Summary: This paper describes the development of European standard EN13481-8, which sets out the performance requirements for rail fastenings which are to be used on tracks carrying trains with heavy axle loads i.e. axle loads greater than 260kN. The standard takes particular account of proposals to run such trains on track aligned for faster lighter trains. The critical loading case arises when heavy freight trains travel at low speeds on curves for which the super-elevation and rail pad resilience have been selected to suit fast passenger trains. Index terms: Rail fastenings, Heavy Haul tracks, assuming typical axle loads of up to 22.5 tonnes 1. NOTATION AND UNITS and maximum axle loads of 26 tonnes, on the basis of a minimum curve radius of 150 metres (or 400 metres where very resilient rail pads were used). α Angle of applied load (deg) M Moment about centre of rail seat (kNm) 3. THE EUROPEAN HEAVY AXLE LOAD CASE P Maximum Load Applied (kN) PL Lateral component of P (kN) At about the time that the technical work on the rail PV Vertical component of P (kN) fastenings standards was completed, discussions were X Position of load application taking place about the possible introduction of freight below centre of gauge corner trains with heavier axle loads in several European radius (mm) countries, most notably in Great Britain, Finland and Sweden. -
The Need for Freight Rail Electrification in Southern California
The Need for Freight Rail Electrification in Southern California Brian Yanity Californians for Electric Rail [email protected] May 13, 2018 Executive Summary Full electrification of freight trains is the only proven zero-emissions freight railroad technology. Electric rail propulsion can take several different forms, including locomotives powered by overhead catenary wire, on-board batteries, or more advanced concepts such as battery tender cars and linear synchronous motors. This white paper is largely a literature review of previous studies on electric freight rail in the Southern California region, with information compiled about existing electric freight rail locomotives and systems from around the world. The two main benefits of freight rail electrification in the region would be reduced air pollution, and reduced consumption of diesel fuel for transportation. Electrification of freight rail in Southern California would reduce the public health impacts to local communities affected by diesel-powered freight transportation, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions of freight movement. The main challenge for electric freight rail is the high capital costs of electric rail infrastructure, especially the overhead catenary wire over tracks. A variety of options for public and/or private financing of freight rail electrification need to be explored. Electrification of the proposed short-haul rail service between the ports and the Inland Empire, currently under study, is an opportunity for using electric locomotives though the Alameda -
Locomotives and Powerheads
REFERENCE LIST LOCOMOTIVES AND POWERHEADS Selection from 1998 to 2017 • The newest generation of TRAXX locomotives is Bombardier Transportation can refer to more based on a modular platform for the worldwide than 100 years of excellence, expertise and application and configuration. experience, to the benefit of our customers, in building locomotives and powerheads. • The development of this new platform is derived on the experiences with proven class 185 and class 186 locomotives for the European market. It shows The BOMBARDIER* TRAXX* locomotive platform is highest productivity because of high traction comprised of locomotives with four different propulsion performance and energy efficiency, high availability systems – AC, DC, MS and DE locomotives. because of top quality, standardized building blocks and experience, high maintenance efficiency and *Trademark(s)of Bombardier Inc. or its subsidiaries. Bombardier © 2017, Inc. or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved. 11839/11-2017/en • More than 2000 TRAXX locomotives have been sold highest commonality in spare parts. for operation throughout Europe to nearly 100 railway operators today. Many of them operate on cross- • BOMBARDIER TRAXX locomotives: proven, innovative border services on all main corridors throughout and ideal for all applications. Europe. LOCOMOTIVES N° of Customer Operation First Customer Country BT Product locos Type corridors commisioning Angel Trains Cargo Germany 12 BR 186 TRAXX F140 MS D-A-B-NL 2006 Angel Trains Cargo Italy 10 E 483 TRAXX F140 DC I 2006 Ferrovie -
Railway Technology Review
ISSN 0013-2845 September 2015 Railway Technology ETR Review INTERNATIONAL EDITION Planning ETCS Innovation in track components Inspection and maintenance Hybrid Drive Economic The next step - Ecologic Ergonomic The Hybrid Machine Sylomer® under-sleeper pads Use of Sylomer® under-sleeper pads to reduce ballast wear on a Scandi- navian heavy-haul railway line The heavy-haul railway line between Luleå and Narvik can conveniently be considered in two parts: the Swedish section (Malmbanan) and the Norwegian section (Ofotbanen). This line has been carrying continuously increasing loads, and so the infrastructure manager decided in 2014 to insert under-sleep- er pads as a means of improving the quality of the track geometry. This decision was influenced by the positive experience that the Austrian Federal Railways (ÖBB) had had with the use of pads under con- crete sleepers and also by projects such as Innotrack and RIVAS. This article contains a brief description of the Iron Ore Line in Scandinavia and the challenges due to heavy train loads. It also explains how under-sleeper pads work and describes the approaches tried out for switches and crossings. 1. OVERVIEW AND FACTS irunavaara Aktiebolag), the Swedish opera- Mag.(FH) Harald Steger Product management tor of the iron mines. These last-mentioned Getzner Werkstoffe GmbH Malmbanan is a railway line providing a trains can have up to 68 wagons with an axle [email protected] route for heavy freight trains in the north of load of 30 t and they run over Malmbanan Scandinavia, linking the sea ports of Luleå at 60 km/h in a laden state and at 70 km/h if (Sweden) and Narvik (Norway). -
Taskload Report Outline
U.S. Department of Transportation Safety Evaluation of High-Speed Rail Bogie Federal Railroad Concepts Administration Office of Research and Development Washington, DC 20590 DOT/FRA/ORD-13/42 Final Report October 2013 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the United States Government, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the United States Government. The United States Government assumes no liability for the content or use of the material contained in this document. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. -
Independent Reporter a Halcrow Group Limited
Independent Reporter A Reporter Mandate – Variable Usage Costs Final Report Halcrow Group Limited Halcrow Group Limited Vineyard House 44 Brook Green London W6 7BY Tel +44 (0)20 7602 7282 Fax +44 (0)20 7603 0095 www.halcrow.com Halcrow Group Limited has prepared this report in accordance with the instructions of their clients, ORR and Network Rail, for their sole and specific use. Any other persons who use any information contained herein do so at their own risk. © Halcrow Group Limited 2008 Independent Reporter A Reporter Mandate - Variable Usage Costs Final Report Contents Amendment Record This report has been issued and amended as follows: Issue Revision Description Date Initial 0 1 Draft Report compiled 16/11/07 PRE/RS 0 2 Draft Final Report 20/12/07 PRE/RS/MG 1 0 Final Report for Comment 14/01/08 PRE/RS/MG 1 1 Final Report with ORR 19/01/08 PRE/RS/MG comments incorporated 1 2 Final Report 12/02/08 PRE/RS/MG Independent Reporter: Variable Usage Cost Report Content Content .................................................................................................................... 3 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Details of Review ................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Background.......................................................................................................... 4 2 Network Rail’s approach to variable usage costs ....................................... -
Railway Bridges on the Iron Ore Line in Northern Sweden – from Axle Loads of 14 to 32,5 Ton
IABSE Conference 2018 – Engineering the Past, to Meet the Needs of the Future June 25-27 2018, Copenhagen, Denmark Railway Bridges on the Iron Ore Line in Northern Sweden – From Axle Loads of 14 to 32,5 ton Ibrahim Coric, Trafikverket, Luleå, Sweden Björn Täljsten, Thomas Blanksvärd, Gabriel Sas, Ulf Ohlsson, Lennart Elfgren Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden Contact: [email protected] Abstract The Iron Ore Railway Line was built around 1900 and has more than 100 bridges. It has a length of ca 500 km and runs from Kiruna and Malmberget in northern Sweden to the ice-free harbour in Narvik in Norway on the Atlantic and to Luleå in Sweden on the Baltic. The original axle load was 14 ton. The axle load has gradually been increased to 25 ton in 1955, to 30 ton in 1998 and to 32,5 ton in 2017. The increases in axle loads have been preceded by monitoring and assessment studies of the bridges. The capacity and need for strengthening or replacement of the bridges have been evaluated. Many of the bridges could carry a higher load than what it was designed for. Experiences from studies before the axle load increases in 1998 and 2017 are presented and discussed. Keywords: Railway bridges, foundations, steel, reinforced and prestressed concrete. Assessment, Strengthening, Fatigue about 25 million ton and the southern route 1 Introduction (Kiruna – Luleå) about 10 million ton. The Iron Ore Railway Line was built 1883-1904 The original axle load was 14 ton (140 kN). and has a length of ca 500 km. -
Use of Electro-Dynamic Braking on Locomotives and Its Effect on Rolling Contact Fatigue
Page 1133 Use of electro-dynamic braking on locomotives and its effect on rolling contact fatigue T. Nordmark & S.A. Khan /XOHn8QLYHUVLW\RI7HFKQRORJ\/XOHn6ZHGHQ C. Domay /.$%.LUXQD6ZHGHQ ABSTRACT: The mining company LKAB uses IORE locomotives to haul iron ore trains. When evaluated using life cycle cost (LCC) analysis for reliability, availability, maintainability and safety (RAMS), wheel life is found to be 930,000 km. The IORE locomotives are equipped with electro-dynamic (ED) brakes, but because of the inability of the contact grid to handle the full regenerative energy from the locomotives, the use of the ED-brake was restricted until the contact grid was upgraded in 2010. From around 2011, the wheel life started to decrease because of increased rolling contact fatigue (RCF), dropping to around 350,000 km. LKAB suspected the use of the ED-brake was contributing to the RCF problem. A field test compared one locomotive with ED-braking reduced to a minimum level to a locomotive with full ED-braking capacity. The wheels of the two locomotives were visually inspected at intervals of about 13,000 km. The results showed no difference in RCF performance between the locomotives. 1 INTRODUCTION from 2001 to 2005 showed that the wheel life would reach 930.000 km. This paper looks at the effect of electro-dynamic (ED) A complete locomotive consists of two sections braking on the generation of rolling contact fatigue with a Co-Co wheel arrangement each. The (RCF) on the wheels of IORE locomotives used by continuous power rating is 10,800 kW (14,400 hp), the Swedish mining company LKAB to haul iron ore and the tractive effort is 1,200 kN with the possibility trains.