DOCSLIB.ORG

Requirement Analysis and Technologies Evaluation for Train's

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Requirement Analysis and Technologies Evaluation for Train's Ref. Ares(2020)804394 - 07/02/2020 Deliverable D 3.1 Requirement Analysis and Technologies Evaluation for Train’s Wireless Backbone Project acronym: FR8RAIL Starting date: 01/09/2016 Duration (in months): 24 Call (part) identifier: S2R-CFM-IP5-01-2015 Grant agreement no: H2020 - 730617 Due date of deliverable: Month 18 Actual submission date: 10-04-2018 Responsible/Author: Francisco Parrilla Ayuso - Indra Sistemas SA Dissemination level: PU Status: Final Reviewed: YES G A H2020 – 730617 [FR8-WP3-D-ISS-019-02 D3.1] P a g e 1 | 139 Document history Revision Date Description 1 27/11/2018 First draft 2 10/04/2018 First Deliverable for TMT revision Report contributors Name Beneficiary Short Details of contribution Name David Batista Plaza INDRA First Draft Francisco Parrilla Ayuso INDRA First Draft Marina Alonso INDRA First Draft Adrián Alberdi INDRA First Draft Benjamin Baasch DLR First Draft revision and contribution Julio Galipienzo CAF First Draft revision and contribution Anders Ekmark TRV First Draft revision and contribution Roald Lengu ASTS First Draft revision and contribution Jaizki Mendizabal CEIT First Draft revision and contribution Jon Goya CEIT First Draft revision and contribution G A H2020 – 730617 [FR8-WP3-D-ISS-019-02 D3.1] P a g e 2 | 139 Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... 7 2 Abbreviations and acronyms ...................................................................................................... 9 3 Background ............................................................................................................................... 10 4 Objective/Aim ........................................................................................................................... 11 5 Analysis Evaluation of the State of the Art Technologies ......................................................... 12 5.1 State of the Art of Railway Freight Operation .................................................................. 12 5.1.1 Purpose and Scope .................................................................................................... 12 5.1.2 Objectives .................................................................................................................. 12 5.1.3 Characteristics of the subsystem ............................................................................... 12 5.1.4 Characteristics of loading units ................................................................................. 13 5.1.5 Characteristics of the rolling stock ............................................................................ 14 5.1.6 Transhipment methods ............................................................................................. 14 5.1.7 Train Integrity ............................................................................................................ 14 5.1.8 Transports systems in the European Union .............................................................. 15 5.1.9 Interoperability in Sweden and Norway .................................................................... 16 5.2 State of Art of Freight Wagons ......................................................................................... 17 5.2.1 Purpose and scope ..................................................................................................... 17 5.2.2 Objectives .................................................................................................................. 17 5.2.3 Structures and mechanics ......................................................................................... 17 5.2.4 Gauging and track interaction ................................................................................... 18 5.2.5 Brake .......................................................................................................................... 18 5.2.6 Environmental Conditions ......................................................................................... 19 5.2.7 System protection ...................................................................................................... 19 5.2.8 Maintenance practices .............................................................................................. 19 5.3 State of Art of Wireless Communication Technologies .................................................... 22 5.3.1 Purpose and scope ..................................................................................................... 22 5.3.2 Objectives .................................................................................................................. 22 5.3.3 Available terrestrial wireless technologies ................................................................ 22 5.3.4 Non-terrestrial technologies...................................................................................... 39 5.3.5 Long Term Evolution (LTE) ......................................................................................... 39 5.3.6 Successful Implementation Cases in Railway environment ...................................... 40 5.3.7 Technologies Comparison.......................................................................................... 42 G A H2020 – 730617 [FR8-WP3-D-ISS-019-02 D3.1] P a g e 3 | 139 5.3.8 Conclusions ................................................................................................................ 44 5.4 State of Art of Wireless Transponder Solutions ............................................................... 45 6 Reference Scenario ................................................................................................................... 52 6.1 Scenario 1: Hannover-Würzburg....................................................................................... 52 6.1.1 General considerations .............................................................................................. 54 6.2 Scenario 2: Zurich-Brugg ................................................................................................... 56 6.3 Scenario 3: Sundsvall-Gavle .............................................................................................. 57 6.3.1 Description of the line ............................................................................................... 57 6.3.2 Description of the locomotive ................................................................................... 60 6.4 Reference Scenario Description ........................................................................................ 60 7 Requirement Analysis ............................................................................................................... 63 7.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 63 7.2 Proposed Use Cases .......................................................................................................... 64 7.2.1 Use Case 1: Continuous Condition Monitoring On-board Freight Wagons .............. 65 7.2.2 Use Case 2: Automatic Coupler ................................................................................. 65 7.2.3 Use Case 3: Cargo Monitoring System....................................................................... 66 7.2.4 Use Case 4: On-board Positioning ............................................................................. 66 7.2.5 Use Case 5: On-board Train Integrity (OTI) ............................................................... 67 7.2.6 Use case 6: Wayside – On-board monitoring data integration ................................. 67 7.3 Beyond the State of the Art .............................................................................................. 68 7.3.1 UC1: Continuous Condition Monitoring On-Board Freight Wagons ......................... 68 7.3.2 UC2: Automatic Coupler ............................................................................................ 69 7.3.3 Cargo Monitoring System .......................................................................................... 70 7.3.4 UC4: On-board Positioning ........................................................................................ 71 7.3.5 UC5: On-board Train Integrity ................................................................................... 71 7.3.6 UC6: Wayside – On-board monitoring data integration ........................................... 72 7.4 User/Business Needs ........................................................................................................ 72 7.5 Top Level Requirements ................................................................................................... 75 8 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................... 76 9 References................................................................................................................................. 77 Appendix A. Top Level Requirements Detail .............................................................................. 81 G A H2020 – 730617 [FR8-WP3-D-ISS-019-02 D3.1] P a g e 4 | 139 List of Figures Fig. 1: Terrestrial Networks ........................................................................................................ 23 Fig. 2: Throughput of 802.11p and 802.11b ..............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bewhuwcii U*& Osilt
    BEWHUWCIi U*& OSiLt REPORT NO. FRA/0R&D-76/275.I % „ LOCOMOTIVE CAB DESIGN DEVELOPMENT Volume I: Analysis of Locomotive Cab Environment & Development of Cab Design Alternatives Jl J. Robinson D. Piccione G. Lamers Boeing Vertol Company P.O. Box 16858 Philadelphia PA 19142 ^A .ususa&j S'A1H O* OCTOBER 1976 INTERIM REPORT DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE TO THE U.S. PUBLIC THROUGH THE NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE. SPRiNOFIELO, VIRGINIA 22161 Prepared for U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION J Office of Research and Development Washington DC 20590 A NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Govern ment assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. 'C NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse pro ducts or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are con sidered essential to the object of this report. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient** Cafolog No. FRA/ORSD-76/275.I 4. Title and Subtitle S. Report Dole LOCOMOTIVE CAB DESIGN DEVELOPMENT October 1976 Volume I: Analysis of Locomotive Cab 6. Performing Orgonnotien Code Environment § Development of Cab Design Alternatives 8. Performing Orgonisotton Report No. Author's) Robinson, D. Piccione, G. Lamers DOT-TSC-FRA-76-22,I 9. Performing Orgcniiotion Nome and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Boeing Vertol Company* RR628T/R7341 11. Contract or Grant No. P.O. Box 16858 Philadelphia PA 19142 DOT-TSC-913-1 13. Type of Report ond Period Covered 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Power Supply System Models for Static Calculations in a Modular Design Implementation
    Railway power supply system models for static calculations in a modular design implementation Usability illustrated by case-studies of northern Malmbanan RONNY SKOGBERG Master’s Degree Project Stockholm, Sweden 2013 XR-EE-ES 2013:006 Railway power supply system models for static calculations in a modular design implementation Usability illustrated by case-studies of northern Malmbanan RONNY SKOGBERG Master of Science Thesis Royal Institute of Technology School of Electrical Engineering Electric Power Systems Stockholm, Sweden, 2013 Supervisors: Lars Abrahamsson, KTH Mario Lagos, Transrail AB Examiner: Lennart Söder XR-EE-ES 2013:006 Abstract Several previous theses and reports have shown that voltage variations, and other types of supply changes, can influence the performance and movements of trains. As part of a modular software package for railway focused calculations, the need to take into account for the electrical behavior of the system was needed, to be used for both planning and operational uses. In this thesis, different static models are presented and used for train related power flow calculations. A previous model used for converter stations is also extended to handle different configurations of multiple converters. A special interest in the train type IORE, which is used for iron ore transports along Malmbanan, and the power systems influence to its performance, as available modules, for mechanical calculations, in the software uses the same train type. A part of this project was to examine changes in the power systems performance if the control of the train converters were changed, both during motoring and regenerative braking. A proposed node model, for the static parts of a railway power system, has been used to simplify the building of the power system model and implementation of the simulation environment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Need for Freight Rail Electrification in Southern California
    The Need for Freight Rail Electrification in Southern California Brian Yanity Californians for Electric Rail [email protected] May 13, 2018 Executive Summary Full electrification of freight trains is the only proven zero-emissions freight railroad technology. Electric rail propulsion can take several different forms, including locomotives powered by overhead catenary wire, on-board batteries, or more advanced concepts such as battery tender cars and linear synchronous motors. This white paper is largely a literature review of previous studies on electric freight rail in the Southern California region, with information compiled about existing electric freight rail locomotives and systems from around the world. The two main benefits of freight rail electrification in the region would be reduced air pollution, and reduced consumption of diesel fuel for transportation. Electrification of freight rail in Southern California would reduce the public health impacts to local communities affected by diesel-powered freight transportation, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions of freight movement. The main challenge for electric freight rail is the high capital costs of electric rail infrastructure, especially the overhead catenary wire over tracks. A variety of options for public and/or private financing of freight rail electrification need to be explored. Electrification of the proposed short-haul rail service between the ports and the Inland Empire, currently under study, is an opportunity for using electric locomotives though the Alameda
    [Show full text]
  • Locomotives and Powerheads
    REFERENCE LIST LOCOMOTIVES AND POWERHEADS Selection from 1998 to 2017 • The newest generation of TRAXX locomotives is Bombardier Transportation can refer to more based on a modular platform for the worldwide than 100 years of excellence, expertise and application and configuration. experience, to the benefit of our customers, in building locomotives and powerheads. • The development of this new platform is derived on the experiences with proven class 185 and class 186 locomotives for the European market. It shows The BOMBARDIER* TRAXX* locomotive platform is highest productivity because of high traction comprised of locomotives with four different propulsion performance and energy efficiency, high availability systems – AC, DC, MS and DE locomotives. because of top quality, standardized building blocks and experience, high maintenance efficiency and *Trademark(s)of Bombardier Inc. or its subsidiaries. Bombardier © 2017, Inc. or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved. 11839/11-2017/en • More than 2000 TRAXX locomotives have been sold highest commonality in spare parts. for operation throughout Europe to nearly 100 railway operators today. Many of them operate on cross- • BOMBARDIER TRAXX locomotives: proven, innovative border services on all main corridors throughout and ideal for all applications. Europe. LOCOMOTIVES N° of Customer Operation First Customer Country BT Product locos Type corridors commisioning Angel Trains Cargo Germany 12 BR 186 TRAXX F140 MS D-A-B-NL 2006 Angel Trains Cargo Italy 10 E 483 TRAXX F140 DC I 2006 Ferrovie
    [Show full text]
  • Taskload Report Outline
    U.S. Department of Transportation Safety Evaluation of High-Speed Rail Bogie Federal Railroad Concepts Administration Office of Research and Development Washington, DC 20590 DOT/FRA/ORD-13/42 Final Report October 2013 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the United States Government, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the United States Government. The United States Government assumes no liability for the content or use of the material contained in this document. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Reporter a Halcrow Group Limited
    Independent Reporter A Reporter Mandate – Variable Usage Costs Final Report Halcrow Group Limited Halcrow Group Limited Vineyard House 44 Brook Green London W6 7BY Tel +44 (0)20 7602 7282 Fax +44 (0)20 7603 0095 www.halcrow.com Halcrow Group Limited has prepared this report in accordance with the instructions of their clients, ORR and Network Rail, for their sole and specific use. Any other persons who use any information contained herein do so at their own risk. © Halcrow Group Limited 2008 Independent Reporter A Reporter Mandate - Variable Usage Costs Final Report Contents Amendment Record This report has been issued and amended as follows: Issue Revision Description Date Initial 0 1 Draft Report compiled 16/11/07 PRE/RS 0 2 Draft Final Report 20/12/07 PRE/RS/MG 1 0 Final Report for Comment 14/01/08 PRE/RS/MG 1 1 Final Report with ORR 19/01/08 PRE/RS/MG comments incorporated 1 2 Final Report 12/02/08 PRE/RS/MG Independent Reporter: Variable Usage Cost Report Content Content .................................................................................................................... 3 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Details of Review ................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Background.......................................................................................................... 4 2 Network Rail’s approach to variable usage costs .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Electro-Dynamic Braking on Locomotives and Its Effect on Rolling Contact Fatigue
    Page 1133 Use of electro-dynamic braking on locomotives and its effect on rolling contact fatigue T. Nordmark & S.A. Khan /XOHn8QLYHUVLW\RI7HFKQRORJ\/XOHn6ZHGHQ C. Domay /.$%.LUXQD6ZHGHQ ABSTRACT: The mining company LKAB uses IORE locomotives to haul iron ore trains. When evaluated using life cycle cost (LCC) analysis for reliability, availability, maintainability and safety (RAMS), wheel life is found to be 930,000 km. The IORE locomotives are equipped with electro-dynamic (ED) brakes, but because of the inability of the contact grid to handle the full regenerative energy from the locomotives, the use of the ED-brake was restricted until the contact grid was upgraded in 2010. From around 2011, the wheel life started to decrease because of increased rolling contact fatigue (RCF), dropping to around 350,000 km. LKAB suspected the use of the ED-brake was contributing to the RCF problem. A field test compared one locomotive with ED-braking reduced to a minimum level to a locomotive with full ED-braking capacity. The wheels of the two locomotives were visually inspected at intervals of about 13,000 km. The results showed no difference in RCF performance between the locomotives. 1 INTRODUCTION from 2001 to 2005 showed that the wheel life would reach 930.000 km. This paper looks at the effect of electro-dynamic (ED) A complete locomotive consists of two sections braking on the generation of rolling contact fatigue with a Co-Co wheel arrangement each. The (RCF) on the wheels of IORE locomotives used by continuous power rating is 10,800 kW (14,400 hp), the Swedish mining company LKAB to haul iron ore and the tractive effort is 1,200 kN with the possibility trains.
    [Show full text]
  • Price List 2021 ESU Gmbh & Co
    Price list 2021 ESU GmbH & Co. KG Recommended retail price list in EUR Edisonallee 29 • D - 89231 Neu-Ulm +49 (0) 731 – 18 47 80 Valid from September 1st 2021 Fax: +49 (0) 731 – 18 47 82 99 All former prices are now invalid. www.esu.eu Art. Description Quar- MSRP Art. Description Quar- MSRP No. ter price No. ter price Pullman Gauge H0 Class T16.1 in H0 n-car «Silberling» in H0 31100 Steam loco, 94 1292, DR, black, Era III/IV, Sound+Smoke, DC/AC 569,00 € 36467 n-car, H0, Bnb719, 22-11 611-7, 2. Kl., DB Era IV, silver 69,90 € 31101 Steam loco, 94 1243, DB, black, Era III, Sound+Smoke, DC/AC 569,00 € 36483 n-car, H0, Bnrz 725, 22-34 106-1, 2. Kl, DB Era IV, silver 69,90 € 31102 Steam loco, 94 652-5, DB, black, Era IV, Sound+Smoke, DC/AC 569,00 € 36484 n-car, H0, Bnrz 725, 22-34 078-2, 2. Kl, DB Era IV, silver 69,90 € 31103 Steam loco, 8158 Essen, KPEV, green, Era I, Sound+Smoke, DC/AC 569,00 € 36485 n-car, H0, ABnrzb 704, 31-34 057-5, 1./2. Kl, DB Era IV, silver 69,90 € 31104 Steam loco, 94 535, DRG, black, Era II, Sound+Smoke, DC/AC 569,00 € 36486 n-car, H0, BDnrzf 740.2, 82-34 322-1, Steuerwagen, DB Era IV, silver 124,90 € 31105 Steam loco, 694 1266, ÖBB, black, Era III, Sound+Smoke, DC/AC 569,00 € 36487 n-car, H0, AB4nb-59, 31479 Esn, 1./2.
    [Show full text]
  • Transitioning to a Zero Or Near-Zero Emission Line-Haul Freight Rail System in California: Operational and Economic Considerations
    Transitioning to a Zero or Near-Zero Emission Line-Haul Freight Rail System in California: Operational and Economic Considerations Final Report Prepared for: State of California Air Resources Board By University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Rail Transportation and Engineering Center (RailTEC) 1245 Newmark Civil Engineering Laboratory, MC-250 205 North Mathews Avenue Urbana, IL 61801 Spring 2016 Transitioning to a Zero or Near-Zero Emission Line-Haul Freight Rail System in California: Operational and Economic Considerations The statements and conclusions in this report are those of the contractor and not necessarily those of the California Air Resources Board. The mention of commercial products, their source, or their use in connection with material reported herein is not to be construed as actual or implied endorsement of such products. ii RailTEC Transitioning to a Zero or Near-Zero Emission Line-Haul Freight Rail System in California: Operational and Economic Considerations Table of Contents Summary................................................................................................................................ xi Locomotive Technology...................................................................................................... xi Line-Haul Freight Interoperability ....................................................................................... xii Line-Haul Freight Operations.............................................................................................xiii Emissions Benefits ............................................................................................................xiii
    [Show full text]
  • Railml2.4 Rollingstock
    railML2.4 Rollingstock Rolling stock functional description for the Norwegian sector Version: 1.2 Date: 17.12.2020 Content Summary The following documents the Norwegian use of the railML2.4 Rollingstock (RS) schema. It contains information about the application of railML2.4 RS, general modelling rules and an example. railML2.4 RS Documentation 2 General Information Content 1 General Information....................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 What is railML2.4 RS ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Why do we need railML2.4 RS ....................................................................................................... 4 1.3 What do we use railML2.4 RS for .................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Reader information ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Syntax guide .................................................................................................................................... 5 2 Norwegian use of railML2.4 RS on element level ..................................................................................... 6 3 General Modelling Rules ............................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Vehicles
    [Show full text]
  • Price List 2020 ESU Gmbh & Co
    Price list 2020 ESU GmbH & Co. KG Recommended retail price list in EUR Edisonallee 29 • D - 89231 Neu-Ulm +49 (0) 731 – 18 47 80 Valid from January 1st 2020 Fax: +49 (0) 731 – 18 47 82 99 All former prices are now invalid. www.esu.eu Art. Description Quar- MSRP Art. Description Quar- MSRP No. ter price No. ter price Pullman Gauge H0 Panorama coach BEX n-car «Silverling» in H0 36357 Panorama coach BEX, Pullman IIm, RhB A 1292, red, Era V 399,00 € 36462 n-car, H0, B4nb-59, 42786 Esn, 2. Kl., DB, Era III, silver, DC Q1/20 69,90 € 36358 Panorama coach BEX, Pullman IIm, RhB B 2501, red, Era V 399,00 € 36465 n-car, H0, Bnb719, 22-12 367-5, 2. Kl., DB, Era IV, silver, DC Q1/20 69,90 € 36359 Panorama coach BEX, Pullman IIm, RhB B 2502, red, Era V 399,00 € 36466 n-car, H0, Bnb719, 22-12 423-6, 2. Kl., DB, Era IV, silver, DC Q1/20 69,90 € 36360 Panorama coach BEX, Pullman IIm, RhB B 2503, red, Era V 399,00 € 36468 n-car, H0, ABnb703, 31-11 503-5, 1./2. Kl., DB, Era IV, silver, DC Q1/20 69,90 € 36361 Panorama coach BEX, Pullman IIm, RhB B 2505, red, Era V 399,00 € 36469 n-car, H0, BDnf735, 82-11 504-1, Steuerwagen, DB, Era IV, silver, DC Q1/20 124,90 € 36363 Panorama coach BEX, Pullman IIm, RhB Bps 2505, red, Era VI 399,00 € 36472 n-car, H0, Bnrz451.4, 22-34 128-5, 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Product Overview 2010 2010
    Product Overview 2010 2010 1 Contents Editorial ........................................................................................................................................................3 The new ECoS 4 The new ECoS - Just Play ..............................................................................................................................5 Functions detailed .........................................................................................................................................7 Expandibility ..................................................................................................................................................9 Navigator 10 Equipment and handling .............................................................................................................................11 Expandibility ................................................................................................................................................12 ECoSlink Terminal 13 ECoSBoost 14 ECoSDetector 16 ECoSDetector Extension ..............................................................................................................................17 ECoSDetector Standard ...............................................................................................................................17 ECoSControl Radio 18 Central Station® - Reloaded 20 SwitchPilot 22 SwitchPilot - Do as you please .....................................................................................................................23
    [Show full text]