DOCSLIB.ORG

International Narcotics Control Strategy Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
International Narcotics Control Strategy Report United States Department of State Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs International Narcotics Control Strategy Report Volume I Drug and Chemical Control March 2013 INCSR 2013 Volume 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents Common Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................ iv International Agreements ......................................................................................................................... vi Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Legislative Basis for the INCSR ................................................................................................................ 2 Presidential Determination ........................................................................................................................ 5 Major Illicit Drug Producing, Drug-Transit, Significant Source, Precursor Chemical, and Money Laundering Countries .............................................................................................................................. 13 Policy and Program Developments ........................................................................... 15 Overview ................................................................................................................................................. 16 Demand Reduction ................................................................................................................................. 19 Methodology for U.S. Government Estimates of Illegal Drug Production ............................................... 22 Worldwide Illicit Drug Crop Cultivation 2005-2011.............................................................................. 25 Worldwide Potential Illicit Drug Production 2005-2011 ...................................................................... 26 Parties to UN Conventions ...................................................................................................................... 27 USG Assistance .......................................................................................................... 33 Department of State Budget.................................................................................................................... 34 International Training .............................................................................................................................. 37 Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) ................................................................................................ 40 United States Coast Guard (USCG) ....................................................................................................... 42 U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ........................................................................................... 44 Chemical Controls....................................................................................................... 46 2012 Trends ............................................................................................................................................ 47 The Road Ahead ..................................................................................................................................... 49 Precursors and Essential Chemicals ...................................................................................................... 49 International Regulatory Framework for Chemical Control ..................................................................... 50 Major Chemical Source Countries and Territories .................................................................................. 50 Significant Illicit Drug Manufacturing Countries ...................................................................................... 64 Major Exporters and Importers of Pseudoephedrine and Ephedrine (Section 722, Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act (CMEA) .............................................................................................. 71 INCB Tables on Licit Requirements ........................................................................................................ 75 Country Reports .......................................................................................................... 82 Afghanistan ............................................................................................................................................. 83 Albania .................................................................................................................................................... 88 Argentina ................................................................................................................................................. 89 Armenia ................................................................................................................................................... 92 Azerbaijan ............................................................................................................................................... 93 The Bahamas .......................................................................................................................................... 94 Belize ....................................................................................................................................................... 98 Bolivia .................................................................................................................................................... 102 Bosnia and Herzegovina ....................................................................................................................... 107 Brazil ..................................................................................................................................................... 108 Bulgaria ................................................................................................................................................. 111 Burma .................................................................................................................................................... 112 Cambodia .............................................................................................................................................. 117 Canada .................................................................................................................................................. 118 i INCSR 2013 Volume 1 Table of Contents Cape Verde ........................................................................................................................................... 122 Chile ...................................................................................................................................................... 123 China ..................................................................................................................................................... 124 Colombia ............................................................................................................................................... 127 Costa Rica ............................................................................................................................................. 132 Croatia ................................................................................................................................................... 137 Cuba ...................................................................................................................................................... 138 Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK or North Korea) ......................................................... 141 Dominican Republic .............................................................................................................................. 142 Dutch Caribbean ................................................................................................................................... 147 Eastern Caribbean ................................................................................................................................ 150 Ecuador ................................................................................................................................................. 154 Egypt ..................................................................................................................................................... 159 El Salvador ............................................................................................................................................ 160 French Caribbean ................................................................................................................................. 165 Georgia .................................................................................................................................................. 166 Germany................................................................................................................................................ 169 Ghana .................................................................................................................................................... 170 Guatemala ............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • International Narcotics Control Strategy Report
    United States Department of State Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs International Narcotics Control Strategy Report Volume I Drug and Chemical Control March 2017 INCSR 2017 Volume 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents Common Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................. iii International Agreements .......................................................................................................................... v INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Policy and Program Developments ......................................................................................................... 17 Overview ................................................................................................................................................. 18 Methodology for U.S. Government Estimates of Illegal Drug Production ............................................... 24 (with dates ratified/acceded) ................................................................................................................... 30 USG Assistance ..................................................................................................................................... 36 International Training .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • World Drug Report 2008 Report Entrusted UNODC with the Mandate to Publish “Com- Can Be Accessed Via
    2008 WORLD DRUG REPORT Acknowledgements This Report was produced in the Policy Analysis and Research Branch under the supervision of Sandeep Chawla, by the Statistics and Survey Section (headed by Angela Me) and the Studies and Threat Analysis Section (headed by Thibault le Pichon). Core Team: Coen Bussink (maps), Philip Davis (data analysis), Laureta Kazanxhiu (maps), Suzanne Kunnen (graphic design and desktop publishing), and Kristina Kuttnig (graphic design and desktop publishing), Theodore Leggett (editorial assistance), Matthew Nice (ATS trends and statistical assistance), Thomas Pietschmann (estimates, trends, market and global analysis, Chapter 2), Catherine Pysden (interactive data), Martin Raithelhuber (coca, opium and cannabis production data and analysis), Wolfgang Rhomberg (database management), Ali Saadeddin (data entry and statistical assistance), Melissa Tullis (project management, global analysis, editorial assistance). The Report also benefited from the work and expertise of many other UNODC staff in Vienna and around the world. UNODC reiterates its appreciation and gratitude to States Members for the reports and information that provided the basis of this edition of the World Drug Report as well as to the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) and the European Monitoring Centre on Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). UNODC would like to thank the Government of Sweden for its continued financial support to the World Drug Report. The boundaries, names and designations used in all maps in this book do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. This publication has not been formally edited. United Nations Publication Sales No. E.08.XI.1 978-92-1-148229-4 CONTENTS Preface 1 Introduction 3 Explanatory notes 5 Executive Summary 7 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2008
    E/INCB/2008/1 preparations containing pseudoephedrine were reported 536. The unsafe practice of sharing needles among in Peru. In July 2008, the Argentine authorities drug abusers remains one of the main causes of HIV identified a case involving the diversion of ephedrine transmission in many countries in South-East Asia. The on a large scale and destroyed a methamphetamine Australian Agency for International Development laboratory in their country. The Board requests the launched the HIV/AIDS Asia Regional Program in Governments of all countries in South America to Chiang Mai, Thailand, in April 2008, to help stop the continue monitoring the licit trade in precursors of spread of HIV/AIDS in South-East Asia through amphetamine-type stimulants, including ephedrine and advocacy, knowledge-sharing and strategic pseudoephedrine traded as raw material or in the form partnerships. The Program, which is expected to last of pharmaceutical preparations, in order to prevent the eight years, involves Governments, regional agencies, diversion of those precursors from licit channels. civil society organizations and drug abuse prevention networks in controlling the spread of HIV transmission associated with drug abuse in Cambodia, China, the C. Asia Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Myanmar, the Philippines and Viet Nam. East and South-East Asia 537. National authorities of countries in East and 1. Major developments South-East Asia continued to report significant seizures of drugs smuggled through the postal system. Large 534. The Board noted the large-scale smuggling of amounts of benzodiazepines and cannabis were seized, illicit drugs into East and South-East Asia from outside but the most often seized drug was methamphetamine.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2010
    Report of the International Narcotics Control Board involving treatment for cocaine abuse accounted for 510. According to the 2009 AIDS Epidemic Update, 65 per cent of all cases involving treatment for published by the Joint United Nations Programme on substance abuse in 1998, and that figure decreased, in HIV/AIDS and WHO, an estimated 29 per cent of the relative terms, to 49 per cent in 2008. For the past more than 2 million Latin Americans who abuse drugs 10 years, cocaine has been the primary drug of abuse by injection are infected with HIV. HIV epidemics among persons treated for drug problems in the region. among such drug abusers in the region tend to be concentrated in the Southern Cone. It is estimated that 506. Demand for “crack” cocaine appears to be in Argentina alone, almost half of the persons who emerging in some countries in South America. In 2008, abuse drugs by injection are infected with HIV. seizures of “crack” cocaine were reported in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of). In the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, C. Asia lifetime prevalence of the abuse of “crack” cocaine among the population aged 15-70 is 11.9 per cent. In East and South-East Asia that country, about a quarter of the persons who received treatment for drug addiction were addicted to 1. Major developments “crack” cocaine. In 2010, the Government of Brazil launched its integrated plan to combat “crack” cocaine 511. In East and South-East Asia, progress in reducing and other drugs. opium production is under threat, owing to an upswing in opium poppy cultivation during the 2009 growing 507.
    [Show full text]
  • Legalisation in South America
    Interest in medical cannabis is growing worldwide, resulting in many countries legalising cannabis for medical use. In particular, the South American market is progressing rapidly and has become a focus for biotech companies seeking to gain a foothold in the global medicinal cannabis market. Consumer perceptions are shifting, with recent studies showing 70% of South Americans agree with the use of medical cannabis and 51% are in favour of legalising cannabis9. However, legislation is still catching up as only six countries in South America have legalised cannabis for medical or recreational use – these are: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Paraguay and Uruguay1. LEGALISATION IN SOUTH AMERICA Argentina – as of March 2017, Argentina has legalised cannabis oil for the treatment of serious medical conditions2. This new law permits the cultivation of cannabis for distribution and research2. The Argentinean government also provides a medical cannabis research program that guarantees free access to cannabis oil to patients who join the program12. Brazil - has the largest population of any country in South America and has partially legalised cannabis use11. To date, the government has decriminalised the possession of small amounts of cannabis1. However, support for cannabis use is growing as in March 2017, the health department of Brazil approved the country’s first-ever license to sell a cannabis-based medical product, Mevatyl (also known as Sativex)3 which is a mouth spray for multiple sclerosis patients2. Colombia - has legalised cannabis for medical use1. This move was made in the hope of diminishing Colombia’s drug trafficking business13. As part of its peace process with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), Colombia also plans to offer a crop substitution program for farmers of illegal coca crops to cultivate cannabis legally instead1.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Border Management an Indian Perspective September 2016
    Content Smart border management p4 / Responding to border management challenges p7 / Challenges p18 / Way forward: Smart border management p22 / Case studies p30 Smart border management An Indian perspective September 2016 www.pwc.in Foreword India’s geostrategic location, its relatively sound economic position vis-à-vis its neighbours and its liberal democratic credentials have induced the government to undertake proper management of Indian borders, which is vital to national security. In Central and South Asia, smart border management has a critical role to play. When combined with liberal trade regimes and business-friendly environments, HIğFLHQWFXVWRPVDQGERUGHUFRQWUROVFDQVLJQLğFDQWO\LPSURYHSURVSHFWVIRUWUDGH and economic growth. India shares 15,106.7 km of its boundary with seven nations—Pakistan, China, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. These land borders run through different terrains; managing a diverse land border is a complex task but YHU\VLJQLğFDQWIURPWKHYLHZRIQDWLRQDOVHFXULW\,QDGGLWLRQ,QGLDKDVDFRDVWDO boundary of 7,516.6 km, which includes 5,422.6 km of coastline in the mainland and 2,094 km of coastline bordering islands. The coastline touches 9 states and 2 union territories. The traditional approach to border management, i.e. focussing only on border security, has become inadequate. India needs to not only ensure seamlessness in the legitimate movement of people and goods across its borders but also undertake UHIRUPVWRFXUELOOHJDOĠRZ,QFUHDVHGELODWHUDODQGPXOWLODWHUDOFRRSHUDWLRQFRXSOHG with the adoption of
    [Show full text]
  • Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul Faculdade
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL FACULDADE DE AGRONOMIA PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIA DO SOLO MÉTODOS APLICADOS À RASTREABILIDADE DE Cannabis sativa L. (MACONHA) EM TERRITÓRIO BRASILEIRO Mauro Sander Fett (Tese) UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL FACULDADE DE AGRONOMIA PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIA DO SOLO MÉTODOS APLICADOS À RASTREABILIDADE DE Cannabis sativa L. (MACONHA) EM TERRITÓRIO BRASILEIRO MAURO SANDER FETT Engenheiro Agrônomo (UFRGS) Mestre em Economia Rural (UFRGS) Tese apresentada como um dos requisitos à obtenção do Grau de Doutor em Ciência do Solo Orientador: Prof. Dr. Flávio Anastácio de Oliveira Camargo Porto Alegre (RS) Outubro de 2017 CIP - Catalogação na Publicação Fett, Mauro Sander MÉTODOS APLICADOS A RASTREABILIDADE DE Cannabis sat iva L . (MACONHA ) EM TERRITÓRI O BRASILEIRO I Mauro Sander Fett. -- 2017. 97 f. Ori entador : Flávi o Anastácio de Oli veira Camargo . Tese (Do utorado) -- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Facul dade de Agronomia, Programa de Pós- Graduação em Ciência do Solo, Porto Alegre, BR- RS, 2017 . 1 . Rastreabilidade. 2 . Cannabi s sativa L . 3. Ci ência forense . 4 . Composição química. 5 . Marcadores genéticos . I. Camargo, Flávio Anastácio de Oliveira, orient . II . Título . Elaborada pelo Sistema de Geração Automática de Ficha Catalogrâfica da UFRGS com os dados fornecidos pelo(a) autor(a ). Dedico à minha família, especialmente meu pai e minha mãe. ii AGRADECIMENTOS Ao professor Flávio Camargo pela orientação e amizade no período do doutorado. Aos colegas de trabalho Rafael Ortiz e Eduardo Ávila pelo incentivo e contribuições no trabalho. Aos pesquisadores, amigos e colaboradores deste projeto de estudo, Gleidson Gimenes, Roberta Mariot e Leonardo Capeleto pelo apoio nos trabalhos.
    [Show full text]
  • English 2014
    The Border Consortium November 2014 PROTECTION AND SECURITY CONCERNS IN SOUTH EAST BURMA / MYANMAR With Field Assessments by: Committee for Internally Displaced Karen People (CIDKP) Human Rights Foundation of Monland (HURFOM) Karen Environment and Social Action Network (KESAN) Karen Human Rights Group (KHRG) Karen Offi ce of Relief and Development (KORD) Karen Women Organisation (KWO) Karenni Evergreen (KEG) Karenni Social Welfare and Development Centre (KSWDC) Karenni National Women’s Organization (KNWO) Mon Relief and Development Committee (MRDC) Shan State Development Foundation (SSDF) The Border Consortium (TBC) 12/5 Convent Road, Bangrak, Suite 307, 99-B Myay Nu Street, Sanchaung, Bangkok, Thailand. Yangon, Myanmar. E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] www.theborderconsortium.org Front cover photos: Farmers charged with tresspassing on their own lands at court, Hpruso, September 2014, KSWDC Training to survey customary lands, Dawei, July 2013, KESAN Tatmadaw soldier and bulldozer for road construction, Dawei, October 2013, CIDKP Printed by Wanida Press CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Context .................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Methodology ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Echogéo, 48 | 2019 Known Unknowns and Unknown Knowns: What We Know About the Cannabis and the Ha
    EchoGéo 48 | 2019 Illegal cannabis cultivation in the world Known Unknowns and Unknown Knowns: What we know about the cannabis and the Hashish trade in Afghanistan James Bradford and David Mansfield Electronic version URL: https://journals.openedition.org/echogeo/17626 DOI: 10.4000/echogeo.17626 ISSN: 1963-1197 Publisher Pôle de recherche pour l'organisation et la diffusion de l'information géographique (CNRS UMR 8586) Electronic reference James Bradford and David Mansfield, “Known Unknowns and Unknown Knowns: What we know about the cannabis and the Hashish trade in Afghanistan”, EchoGéo [Online], 48 | 2019, Online since 13 July 2019, connection on 31 July 2021. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/echogeo/17626 ; DOI: https:// doi.org/10.4000/echogeo.17626 This text was automatically generated on 31 July 2021. EchoGéo est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) Known Unknowns and Unknown Knowns: What we know about the cannabis and the Ha... 1 Known Unknowns and Unknown Knowns: What we know about the cannabis and the Hashish trade in Afghanistan James Bradford and David Mansfield Introduction 1 In recent decades, Afghanistan has become synonymous with opium. Whether it is the annually-increasing quantities harvested, or the much-publicized connections to insurgent groups like the Taliban, opium is center-stage in the contemporary narrative of Afghanistan. And yet, opium is but one of a broader mosaic of drugs that include heroin, alcohol and more recently methamphetamine, that comprise the illicit drug economy and Afghan drug culture.
    [Show full text]
  • US and NATO Military Planning on Mission of V Corps/US Army During Crises and in Wartime,' (Excerpt)
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified December 16, 1982 East German Ministry of State Security, 'US and NATO Military Planning on Mission of V Corps/US Army During Crises and in Wartime,' (excerpt) Citation: “East German Ministry of State Security, 'US and NATO Military Planning on Mission of V Corps/US Army During Crises and in Wartime,' (excerpt),” December 16, 1982, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, BStU, Berlin, ZA, HVA, 19, pp. 126-359. Translated from German by Bernd Schaefer; available in original language at the Parallel History Project. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/112680 Summary: The Stasi's own preface to the V Corps/U.S. Army 1981 war plan (which recognizes that NATO's concept was defensive in nature in contrast to Warsaw Pact plans, which until 1987 indeed envisioned the mentioned "breakthrough towards the Rhine") Original Language: German Contents: English Translation MINISTRY FOR STATE SECURITY Top Secret! Berlin, 16. Dec 1982 Only for personal use! Nr. 626/82 Return is requested! Expl. 5. Bl. MY Information about Military planning of the USA and NATO for the operation of the V. Army Corps/USA in times of tension and in war Part 1 Preliminary Remarks Through reliable intelligence we received portions of the US and NATO military crisis and wartime planning for the deployment of the V Corps/USA stationed in the FRG. This intelligence concerns the secret Operations Plan 33001 (GDP – General Defense Plan) for the V Corps/USA in Europe. The plan is endorsed by the US Department of the Army and, after consultation with NATO, became part of NATO planning.
    [Show full text]
  • External Support for Central Asian Military and Security Forces, Working
    External Support for Central Asian Military and Security Forces Working Paper DMITRY GORENBURG January 2014 Contents Summary iii Abbreviations vi 1. Introduction 1 2. Central Asian military capabilities and plans 2 I. Kazakhstan 3 II. Uzbekistan 8 III. Turkmenistan 12 IV. Kyrgyzstan 15 V. Tajikistan 20 VI. Overall trends in Central Asian military and security force capabilities 24 3. Assistance from Russia and former Soviet states 26 I. Equipment sales and donations 26 II. Cooperation in military exercises and joint operations 36 III. Bilateral exercises and training agreements 40 IV. Goals and consequences of Russian military assistance 46 4. Assistance from the United States 49 I. Equipment sales and donations 51 II. Cooperation in military exercises and joint operations 56 III. Goals and consequences of US military assistance 66 5. Assistance from other countries 69 I. Equipment sales and donations 69 II. Exercises and training 76 III. Goals and consequences of military assistance from other states 81 6. Conclusions and recommendations 83 I. Efforts to manipulate threat perceptions to increase local power 84 II. The impact of foreign assistance on military capabilities 85 III. The impact of foreign assistance on the capabilities of security services 87 IV. Recommendations 88 Summary As the drawdown of United States and coalition forces in Afghanistan has accelerated in preparation for the end of Operation Enduring Freedom in 2014, media attention has come to focus on the extent to which equipment being withdrawn from the region will be left behind for Central Asian states to use. At the same time, recent agreements for the extension of Russian military basing agreements in Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan have drawn attention to the extent to which Russia is providing military equipment and other forms of security assistance to the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalsecurityanddefencestrate
    1TableMANDATE of Contents 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 4 EXECUTIVE SUmmARY CHAPTER ONE 5 THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENT CHAPTER TWO 7 NATIONAL SECURITY AND DEFENCE: VISION AND VALUES 8 NATIONAL SECURITY AND DEFENCE STRATEGY PILLARS 9 CORE NATIONAL VALUES CHAPTER THREE 12 NATIONAL SECURITY AND DEFENCE STRATEGY 12 CORE CONCEPTS AND REQUIRED CAPABILITIES 13 1 MAINTAIN THE SOVEREIGNTY AND TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY OF BELIZE 15 2 REDUCE LOCAL AND TRANSNATIONAL CRIME 18 3 PROVIDE THE NECEssARY ENVIRONMENT FOR A PROSPEROUS AND STABLE BELIZE. CHAPTER FOUR 23 MONITORING AND EVALUATION 23 PERIODIC STRATEGY REVIEWS 24 THE NATIONAL SECURITY AND DEFENCE STRATEGY: LEAD AGENCY RESPONSIBILITY 28 GLOssARY 29 REFERENCE The global security environment is faced with a complex set of threatsMandate that, to a large extent, is common to both the Central American and Caribbean regions. By extension, Belize is faced with similar threats to our national security emanating from local and foreign actors. The most troubling are threats to our sovereignty and territorial integrity, our prosperity, and law and order. Over the past year the nation and, indeed the world, bore witness to the Republic of Guatemala’s claim that it possesses sovereignty to parts of our territory. This is despite the demarcation executed by the British and Guatemalan Boundary Commissioner in the 1859 Treaty which clearly shows what comprise the 8867sq miles of Belizean territory – a demarcation that has since been observed and accepted in published maps and State practice. The Government of Belize is particularly concerned about the activities of the Guatemalan Authorities along the Sarstoon River in Southern Belize. The Government of Belize has been calling for the Republic of Guatemala and the Organization of American States (OAS) to join the effort to develop confidence building measures for the Sarstoon River.
    [Show full text]