DOCSLIB.ORG

Joe Faykosh on a Third Term for FDR: the Election of 1940

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

John W. Jeffries. A Third Term for FDR: The Election of 1940. American Presidential Elections Series. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2017. Illustrations. 264 pp. $34.95, cloth, ISBN 978-0-7006-2402-7. Reviewed by Joe Faykosh Published on H-FedHist (May, 2018) Commissioned by Caryn E. Neumann (Miami University of Ohio Regionals) In 1940, opponents of Franklin Roosevelt’s polling, congressional and state races, and other third-term bid circulated buttons that read: data to give nuance to the numeric result. “Washington Wouldn’t, Grant Couldn’t, Roosevelt Jeffries divides his book into fve logical sec‐ Shouldn’t.” Roosevelt’s precedent-busting bid for a tions, giving equal coverage to Roosevelt’s maturi‐ third term can too often appear today through the ty as Democratic Party leader, the Democratic Par‐ prism of inevitability: the subsequent administra‐ ty’s search for an adequate successor to the Roo‐ tion and the war effort are so well known that the sevelt machine, the Republican Party’s similar but election has often been overlooked. In A Third more desperate search to fnd someone to carry Term for FDR: The Election of 1940, John W. Jef‐ their altered banner in a post-New Deal climate, fries expertly details the events and people who the brief but tumultuous campaigns of Roosevelt contributed to this unique electoral cycle: from and Wendell Wilkie, and an in-depth considera‐ Roosevelt’s hedging and the behind-the-scenes tion of the 1940 electorate demographics. Far wrangling of fellow Democrats unsure of FDR’s from showing that Roosevelt’s third election was machinations to the efforts of well-known and ob‐ predetermined or inevitable, Jeffries gives a thor‐ scure Republicans alike to reclaim their political ough account of Wilkie’s Republican competitors power after eight years out of power. and the New Deal backlash that provided an Jeffries’s A Third Term for FDR provides a opening for his well-funded and organized cam‐ comprehensive, compelling, and concise narrative paign. Roosevelt similarly faced partisan opposi‐ of the tumultuous 1940 presidential election cycle, tion as his expansions of the New Deal, attempted mixing ideological clashes, personality conflicts, purge of Democratic critics, and effort to pack the and voluminous electoral data. While other books Supreme Court met with strong reaction and have focused on the foreign policy implications of mixed motivations from some of his closest allies Roosevelt’s third-term gambit, Jeffries’s book fo‐ and harshest critics. cuses attention on the domestic successes and in‐ Roosevelt’s third term exemplifies, perhaps tra-party corralling that enabled his unprecedent‐ more than anything else, the power he had over ed candidacy. Jeffries also makes the important his administration, his party, and all of those contribution of providing an exhaustive review of around him. Jeffries vividly depicts the abortive the demographics of the 1940 presidential elec‐ attempts of intra-party rivals John Nance Garner, tion, examining the general election tallies against Cordell Hull, and James Farley, among others, to H-Net Reviews take the mantle from the incumbent. Roosevelt is membership divided among conservative, liberal, largely inscrutable, with his available correspon‐ and moderate constituencies was confusing and dence demonstrating a preference toward people- largely self-applied. Jeffries completes the difficult pleasing over direct and precise views on the task of separating these intra-party factions and events around him; as Jeffries states, “the presi‐ describes how these schisms informed opposition dent remained silent, enigmatic, and playful...— to potential candidates and policies, giving an as‐ and seemed in conversations both to advance and tute and clear understanding of this fractious dismiss other possible candidacies” (p. 93). Roo‐ time in party politics. This is also the story of Roo‐ sevelt weaponized his ambivalence to step down sevelt fnding his ideological voice as a party lead‐ or continue by torpedoing the chances for his par‐ er, who charged himself with “carrying out the ty to imagine future success without him at the definitely liberal declaration of principles” and helm. Jeffries illuminates the danger of this lack pitted himself against “outspoken reactionaries” of imagination for Democrats, as the party’s for‐ and conservatives with their “concerted cam‐ tunes fuctuated with Roosevelt’s personal charm paign of defeatism” (p. 31). While the book rightly and appeal to voters. Viewing this election as a deserves credit for its focus on domestic debates referendum on the Republican and/or Democratic during the election and incomparable demo‐ Party is impossible: the candidate consuming all graphic analysis of the results, this explanation of of the oxygen in 1940 was Roosevelt. ideologies is superior. As detailed in A Third Term for FDR, Wilkie Roosevelt’s remarkable political career tried, in vain, to draw a dichotomy between him‐ reached an important fork in the road in 1940, self and Roosevelt, particularly on criticism of the and he cast his political future (and life) with a New Deal and Roosevelt’s apparent dictatorial re‐ commitment to stay in the office longer than any‐ luctance to leave the White House. Yet Roosevelt one else, breaking all precedents and criticisms of could change the game as quickly as Wilkie decorum. Jeffries provides an excellent narrative learned the rules, focusing on domestic issues of the decision making and challenges that made where opportune, and then on the growing for‐ this election truly dynamic and historical, forever eign tension when necessary to rally the party cementing Roosevelt’s legacy as a singular politi‐ and public around the fag. It was an unwinnable cian. The 1940 election was a crossroads: Roo‐ gambit, but Wilkie was game, traveling around sevelt was faced with retirement or the further the country and developing a consistent if ineffec‐ stress of his job; Wilkie was faced with criticizing tive message. Far from a co-signor to the New his opponent or being a dutiful, people-pleasing Deal, and a lame opponent to the victorious Roo‐ citizen at a tumultuous time; and the American sevelt, Wilkie was a strong and incisive critic (and people were faced with a choice between a known former Democrat) who offered “one spot of color” politician, whose legacy grew outsized with each and “appears to say anything he really thinks,” ac‐ passing day, and a staunch critic offering an alter‐ cording to Arthur Krock (p. 66). Wilkie was also a native path. Jeffries, too, faced a crossroads in candidate who ran an exhaustive, nationwide writing this book: offering the same narrative campaign and offered voters a true choice for about Roosevelt’s inevitable victory or a truly in‐ president. sightful work that explores all sides and possibili‐ Another key contribution of A Third Term for ties, and adds nuance to the campaign and results. FDR is Jeffries’s focused dissection of the various Let us be glad he chose the latter. ideologies used at the time by both Democrats and Republicans. For the Democratic Party, having 2 H-Net Reviews If there is additional discussion of this review, you may access it through the network, at https://networks.h-net.org/h-fedhist Citation: Joe Faykosh. Review of Jeffries, John W. A Third Term for FDR: The Election of 1940. H-FedHist, H-Net Reviews. May, 2018. URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=51595 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 3.
Recommended publications
  • Presidents Worksheet 43 Secretaries of State (#1-24)

    Presidents Worksheet 43 Secretaries of State (#1-24)

    PRESIDENTS WORKSHEET 43 NAME SOLUTION KEY SECRETARIES OF STATE (#1-24) Write the number of each president who matches each Secretary of State on the left. Some entries in each column will match more than one in the other column. Each president will be matched at least once. 9,10,13 Daniel Webster 1 George Washington 2 John Adams 14 William Marcy 3 Thomas Jefferson 18 Hamilton Fish 4 James Madison 5 James Monroe 5 John Quincy Adams 6 John Quincy Adams 12,13 John Clayton 7 Andrew Jackson 8 Martin Van Buren 7 Martin Van Buren 9 William Henry Harrison 21 Frederick Frelinghuysen 10 John Tyler 11 James Polk 6 Henry Clay (pictured) 12 Zachary Taylor 15 Lewis Cass 13 Millard Fillmore 14 Franklin Pierce 1 John Jay 15 James Buchanan 19 William Evarts 16 Abraham Lincoln 17 Andrew Johnson 7, 8 John Forsyth 18 Ulysses S. Grant 11 James Buchanan 19 Rutherford B. Hayes 20 James Garfield 3 James Madison 21 Chester Arthur 22/24 Grover Cleveland 20,21,23James Blaine 23 Benjamin Harrison 10 John Calhoun 18 Elihu Washburne 1 Thomas Jefferson 22/24 Thomas Bayard 4 James Monroe 23 John Foster 2 John Marshall 16,17 William Seward PRESIDENTS WORKSHEET 44 NAME SOLUTION KEY SECRETARIES OF STATE (#25-43) Write the number of each president who matches each Secretary of State on the left. Some entries in each column will match more than one in the other column. Each president will be matched at least once. 32 Cordell Hull 25 William McKinley 28 William Jennings Bryan 26 Theodore Roosevelt 40 Alexander Haig 27 William Howard Taft 30 Frank Kellogg 28 Woodrow Wilson 29 Warren Harding 34 John Foster Dulles 30 Calvin Coolidge 42 Madeleine Albright 31 Herbert Hoover 25 John Sherman 32 Franklin D.
  • Picking the Vice President

    Picking the Vice President

    Picking the Vice President Elaine C. Kamarck Brookings Institution Press Washington, D.C. Contents Introduction 4 1 The Balancing Model 6 The Vice Presidency as an “Arranged Marriage” 2 Breaking the Mold 14 From Arranged Marriages to Love Matches 3 The Partnership Model in Action 20 Al Gore Dick Cheney Joe Biden 4 Conclusion 33 Copyright 36 Introduction Throughout history, the vice president has been a pretty forlorn character, not unlike the fictional vice president Julia Louis-Dreyfus plays in the HBO seriesVEEP . In the first episode, Vice President Selina Meyer keeps asking her secretary whether the president has called. He hasn’t. She then walks into a U.S. senator’s office and asks of her old colleague, “What have I been missing here?” Without looking up from her computer, the senator responds, “Power.” Until recently, vice presidents were not very interesting nor was the relationship between presidents and their vice presidents very consequential—and for good reason. Historically, vice presidents have been understudies, have often been disliked or even despised by the president they served, and have been used by political parties, derided by journalists, and ridiculed by the public. The job of vice president has been so peripheral that VPs themselves have even made fun of the office. That’s because from the beginning of the nineteenth century until the last decade of the twentieth century, most vice presidents were chosen to “balance” the ticket. The balance in question could be geographic—a northern presidential candidate like John F. Kennedy of Massachusetts picked a southerner like Lyndon B.
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form Date Entered

    National Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form Date Entered

    Form No. 10-300 (Rev. 10-74) ^jt UNHLDSTAn.S DLPARTP^K'T Oh TUt, INILR1OR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES RECEIVED INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM DATE ENTERED SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES - COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS NAME HISTORIC John Nance Garner House AND/OR COMMON Ettie R. Garner Memorial Buildinp [LOCATION STREET& NUMBFR 333 North Park Street _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT CITY. TOWN 21 Uvalde VICINITY OF STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Texas Uvalde 463 CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE ^DISTRICT ^.PUBLIC —OCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE X_MUSEUM X-BUILDING(S) _PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL __PARK —STRUCTURE J&BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL X.PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT —IN PROCESS —XYES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION _NO —MILITARY —OTHER. OWNER OF PROPERTY Contact: Mrs. Hugh Porter, Curator Garner Memorial Museum NAME City of Uvalde 333 North Park Street, Uvalde STREETS NUMBER City Hall CITY, TOWN STATE Uvalde VICINITY OF Texas [LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS,ETC office of the County Clerk STREETS NUMBER Uvalde County Courthouse, N. Getty at E. Main CITY, TOWN STATE Uvalde Texas REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE None DATE — FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY _LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY, TOWN STATE DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED _UNALTERED X_ORIGINAL SITE ^LcOOD —RUINS ?_ALTERED _MOVED DATE——————— _FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBETHE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE From 1920 until his wife's death in 1952, Garner made his permanent home in this two-story, H-shaped, hip-roofed, brick house, which was designed for him by architect Atlee Ayers.
  • The Vice President in the U.S. Senate: Examining the Consequences of Institutional Design

    The Vice President in the U.S. Senate: Examining the Consequences of Institutional Design

    The Vice President in the U.S. Senate: Examining the Consequences of Institutional Design. Michael S. Lynch Tony Madonna Asssistant Professor Assistant Professor University of Kansas University of Georgia [email protected] [email protected] January 25, 2010∗ ∗The authors would like to thank Scott H. Ainsworth, Stanley Bach, Ryan Bakker, Sarah A. Binder, Jamie L. Carson, Michael H. Crespin, Keith L. Dougherty, Trey Hood, Andrew Martin, Ryan J. Owens and Steven S. Smith for comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. Madonna also thanks the University of Georgia American Political Development working group for support and comments, and Rachel Snyder for helpful research assistance. All errors remain the authors. Abstract The constitutional designation of the vice president as the president of the United States Senate is a unique feature of the chamber. It places control over the Senate's rules and precedents under an individual who is not elected by the chamber and receives no direct benefits from the maintenance of its institutions. We argue that this feature of the Senate has played an important, recurring role in its development. The vice president has frequently acted in a manner that conflicted with the wishes chamber majorities. Consequently, the Senate has developed rules and precedents that insulate the chamber from its presiding officer. These actions have made the Senate a less efficient chamber, but have largely freed it from the potential influence of the executive branch. We examine these arguments using a mix of historical and contemporary case studies, as well as empirical data on contentious rulings on questions of order.
  • THE POLITICAL CAREER of JAMES A. FARLEY by .Eaplene Swind^Man a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT of HISTORY In

    THE POLITICAL CAREER of JAMES A. FARLEY by .Eaplene Swind^Man a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT of HISTORY In

    The political career of James A. Farley Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Swindeman, Earlene, 1941- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 01/10/2021 10:23:49 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/317993 THE POLITICAL CAREER OF JAMES A. FARLEY by .Eaplene Swind^man A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS . In The Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfill­ ment of requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknow­ ledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the inter­ ests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, per­ mission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: y Herman Bateman V Dkte Professor of History ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author expresses foremost appreciation to her advisors Dr.

  • The Vice President's Room

    THE VICE PRESIDENT’S ROOM THE VICE PRESIDENT’S ROOM Historical Highlights The United States Constitution designates the vice president of the United States to serve as president of the Senate and to cast the tie-breaking vote in the case of a deadlock. To carry out these duties, the vice president has long had an office in the Capitol Building, just outside the Senate chamber. Earliest known photographic view of the room, c. 1870 Due to lack of space in the Capitol’s old Senate wing, early vice presidents often shared their room with the president. Following the 1850s extension of the building, the Senate formally set aside a room for the vice president’s exclusive use. John Breckinridge of Kentucky was the first to occupy the new Vice President’s Room (S–214), after he gavelled the Senate into session in its new chamber in 1859. Over the years, S–214 has provided a convenient place for the vice president to conduct business while at the Capitol. Until the Russell Senate Office Building opened in 1909, the room was the only space in the city assigned to the vice presi- dent, and it served as the sole working office for such men as Hannibal Hamlin, Chester Alan Arthur, and Theodore Roosevelt. Death of Henry Wilson, 1875 Several notable and poignant events have occurred in the Vice President’s Room over the years. In 1875 Henry Wilson, Ulysses S. Grant’s vice president, died in the room after suffering a stroke. Six years later, following President James Garfield’s assassination, Vice President Chester Arthur took the oath of office here as president.
  • DISSERTATION Presented to the Graduate Council of the North

    DISSERTATION Presented to the Graduate Council of the North

    4Z SAM RAYBURN: TRIALS OF A PARTY MAN DISSERTATION Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By Edward 0. Daniel, B.A., M.A. Denton, Texas May, 1979 Daniel, Edward 0., Sam Rayburn: Trials of a Party Man. Doctor of Philosophy (History), May, 1979, 330 pp., bibliog- raphy, 163 titles. Sam Rayburn' s remarkable legislative career is exten- sively documented, but no one has endeavored to write a political biography in which his philosophy, his personal convictions, and the forces which motivated him are analyzed. The object of this dissertation is to fill that void by tracing the course of events which led Sam Rayburn to the Speakership of the United States House of Representatives. For twenty-seven long years of congressional service, Sam Rayburn patiently, but persistently, laid the groundwork for his elevation to the speakership. Most of his accomplish- ments, recorded in this paper, were a means to that end. His legislative achievements for the New Deal were monu- mental, particularly in the areas of securities regulation, progressive labor laws, and military preparedness. Rayburn rose to the speakership, however, not because he was a policy maker, but because he was a policy expeditor. He took his orders from those who had the power to enhance his own station in life. Prior to the presidential election of 1932, the center of Sam Rayburn's universe was an old friend and accomplished political maneuverer, John Nance Garner. It was through Garner that Rayburn first perceived the significance of the "you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" style of politics.
  • Keven Mcqueen (2001): Offbeat Kentuckians: Richard M. Johnson: One of Franklin D

    Keven Mcqueen (2001): Offbeat Kentuckians: Richard M. Johnson: One of Franklin D

    Keven McQueen (2001): Offbeat Kentuckians: Richard M. Johnson: One of Franklin D. Roosevelt‘s vice presidents, John Nance Garner, famous lamented, "The vice presidency isn’t worth a pitcher of warm spit.” However, on occasion we encounter a vice president whose performance itself isn’t worth a pitcher of warm spit. One of these was Kentucky’s Richard M. Johnson. Johnson was born on October 17, 1780 (some sources claim 1781), when much of Kentucky was still the untamed frontier. The site of his birth was a settlement called Beargrass, now known more familiarly as Louisville. Shortly thereafter, the family moved first to Bryant’s Station, near Lexington, and then to Scott County. According to relatives, when he was a young man Johnson fell in love with a woman who was either a schoolteacher or a seamstress. He wanted to marry her, but his mother forbade the union. Deeply hurt, Johnson vowed she would regret her interference some day. His revenge was many years delayed, but when it finally came it caused a major political and social scandal. Johnson’s career in politics started normally enough. He attended Transylvania University in Lexington, then afterwards studied law. He became a professional lawyer at age 19. Upon developing an interest in politics, he became a member of the General Assembly from 1804–06 and was elected to the House of Representatives in 1807. His career in the House was interrupted by the War of 1812. Johnson, a commissioned Army colonel, led a regiment of volunteers to Canada in 1813, where they fought the British and the Indians.
  • 19. the New Deal Democrats: Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Democratic Party

    19. the New Deal Democrats: Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Democratic Party

    fdr4freedoms 1 19. The New Deal Democrats: Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Democratic Party With Franklin D. Roosevelt at its helm, the Democratic Party underwent a historic transformation. Before FDR rose to national prominence in the early 1930s, the party had represented a loose conglomeration of local and regional interests. Dominated by the “solid South” that dated to post–Civil War Reconstruction, this group also included Great Plains and Western farmers influenced by the Populist and Progressive movements, as well as the burgeoning ethnic populations of the great cities of the North and East, where the “machine politics” epitomized by New York City’s Tammany Hall ruled the day. Above: A banner for Franklin D. Roosevelt over a pawnshop in This diverse assemblage did not adhere to a central Rosslyn, Virginia, September 1936. ideology or political philosophy, but was instead heavily In November, FDR would outdo his influenced by religious and geographical identities and electoral margins of 1932, winning all but two states and the highest interests. Democrats might be found on both sides of a percentage of electoral votes since variety of political issues. Ironically, the party was home to the virtually uncontested election both the new waves of heavily Catholic and Jewish immigrants of 1820. of the Northeast and the extremely anti-Catholic and nativist Left: A poster for Franklin D. Ku Klux Klan of the South. Roosevelt’s 1932 campaign for president, calling for “action” and The Republicans enjoyed significant support across a fairly “constructive leadership.” The Great wide spectrum of the American political landscape. That party Depression was so cataclysmic that was heavily favored by northern white Protestants, small and it created an appetite for change in America, helping FDR lead a large business interests, professional white-collar workers, historic shift in voting patterns.
  • Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Catholicism, 1932-1936. George Quitman Flynn Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College

    Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Catholicism, 1932-1936. George Quitman Flynn Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College

    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1966 Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Catholicism, 1932-1936. George Quitman Flynn Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Flynn, George Quitman, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Catholicism, 1932-1936." (1966). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 1123. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/1123 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 66-6443 FLYNN, George Quitman, 1937- FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT AND AMERICAN CATHOLICISM, 1932-1936. Louisiana State University, Ph.D., 1966 History, modem University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT AND AMERICAN CATHOLICISM, 1932-1936 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by George Quitman Flynn B.S., Loyola University of the South, 1960 M.A., Louisiana State University, 1962 January, 1966 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to thank Professor Burl Noggle for his assistance in directing this dissertation. Due to the author's military obligation, much of the revision of this dissertation was done by mail. Because of Professor Noggle's promptness in reviewing and returning the manuscript, a situation which could have lengthened the time required to complete the work proved to be only a minor inconvenience.
  • The New Deal Search for a Governor of Hawai'i

    The New Deal Search for a Governor of Hawai'i

    H. BRETT MELENDY The New Deal Search for a Governor of Hawai'i THE BEGINNING OF THE 1930s saw the world in a deep economic depression. By 1932, Americans were looking for new leadership to improve their lot. In January 1932, New York Governor Franklin D. Roosevelt announced his candidacy for president. On April 28, Hawai'i's Democratic Territorial Central Committee endorsed Roose- velt for his party's nomination and then endorsed Lincoln McCand- less for territorial governor. The committee then prevailed upon McCandless to accept once more its nomination for delegate after assuring him that such a move would not interfere with his quest to become governor of Hawai'i. The Organic Act of 1900, creating the Territory of Hawai'i, required the president to nominate the territor- ial governor. Thus Island Democrats looked forward to having a Dem- ocratic governor in 1933.! Hawai'i's November 8, 1932, election saw Democrats increasing their numbers in the territorial legislature: in the Senate from one to four and from three to ten in the House of Representatives. How- ever, the Republicans remained in firm control with eleven senators and twenty representatives. In the delegate's race, McCandless defeated incumbent Victor Houston, bringing him the seat he had sought for almost three decades. He served but one term, however, as Republican Samuel Wilder King turned back the Democrat's 1934 reelection bid. As Republicans staggered "under the news of the H. Brett Melendy is professor emeritus of history at the University of Hawai'i and author of Walter Francis Dillingham, 1875-1963: Hawaiian Entrepreneur and Statesman (1996).
  • Franklin D Roosevelt's Visit to Sidney During the Drouth of 1936

    Franklin D Roosevelt's Visit to Sidney During the Drouth of 1936

    Nebraska History posts materials online for your personal use. Please remember that the contents of Nebraska History are copyrighted by the Nebraska State Historical Society (except for materials credited to other institutions). The NSHS retains its copyrights even to materials it posts on the web. For permission to re-use materials or for photo ordering information, please see: http://www.nebraskahistory.org/magazine/permission.htm Nebraska State Historical Society members receive four issues of Nebraska History and four issues of Nebraska History News annually. For membership information, see: http://nebraskahistory.org/admin/members/index.htm Article Title: Franklin D Roosevelt's Visit to Sidney During the Drouth of 1936 Full Citation: Bethene Wookey Larson, "Franklin D Roosevelt's Visit to Sidney During the Drouth of 1936," Nebraska History 65 (1984): 1-14. URL of article: http://www.nebraskahistory.org/publish/publicat/history/full-text/NH1984Drouth1936.pdf Date: 8/22/2012 Article Summary: President Franklin D Roosevelt's nine-car presidential train, including the Pullman Pioneer, made a journey westward to see firsthand the conditions in the great Midlands drouth area and initiate his campaign for reelection. During that journey, his route took him through Sidney, Nebraska, in order to attend the funeral of his Secretary of State George H Dern in Salt Lake City, Utah. This is a recounting of a portion of that train trip and the visit to Sidney. Cataloging Information: Names: Franklin D Roosevelt, Alfred M Landon, Robert L Cochran,