<<

• CAMP, MAYHAN, AND O’DONNELL Wideband for Ballistic Missile Defense and Range-Doppler Imaging of Satellites Wideband Radar for Ballistic Missile Defense and Range- Doppler Imaging of Satellites

William W. Camp, Joseph T. Mayhan, and Robert M. O’Donnell

■ Lincoln Laboratory led the nation in the development of high-power wideband radar with a unique capability for resolving target scattering centers and producing three-dimensional images of individual targets. The Laboratory fielded the first wideband radar, called ALCOR, in 1970 at Kwajalein Atoll. Since 1970 the Laboratory has developed and fielded several other wideband for use in ballistic-missile-defense research and space-object identification. In parallel with these radar systems, the Laboratory has developed high-capacity, high-speed signal and data processing techniques and algorithms that permit generation of target images and derivation of other target features in near real time. It has also pioneered new ways to realize improved resolution and scatterer-feature identification in wideband radars by the development and application of advanced signal processing techniques. Through the analysis of dynamic target images and other wideband observables, we can acquire knowledge of target form, structure, materials, motion, mass distribution, identifying features, and function. Such capability is of great benefit in ballistic missile decoy discrimination and in space-object identification.

     for the ment, and characterization of a full-scale interconti- development of wideband radar systems was nental ballistic missile (ICBM) targets. A major effort Trooted in the success of high-power instru- of BMD research at Lincoln Laboratory was the de- mentation radars for research in ballistic missile de- velopment of techniques to discriminate warheads fense (BMD) and satellite surveillance. In 1962 the from penetration aids, or penaids. These penaids, Target Resolution and Discrimination Experiment which accompany warheads in a ballistic missile reen- (TRADEX) radar, which was modeled in part after try complex, are devices designed to confuse, blind, the Millstone Hill radar in Westford, Massachusetts, overwhelm, or otherwise prevent defense systems and built by RCA, became operational at Kwajalein from identifying and destroying the warheads. The Atoll in the Marshall Islands. This UHF and L-band Laboratory worked both on the development of pen- radar was the primary sensor for the Advance Re- aids for U.S. missile systems and on techniques for search Projects Agency (ARPA)–sponsored Pacific real-time discrimination of potential enemy penaids Range Electromagnetic Signature Studies (PRESS) that could be used against U.S. defense systems. A project, which Lincoln Laboratory managed for the major penetration aid at that time was the decoy, a U.S. Army in support of its BMD program [1]. device that looked to the radar like a real warhead. Project PRESS emphasized the use of radar and Decoys could be quite sophisticated and complex, optical sensors for the observation, tracking, measure- but they all conformed to the basic requirement of

VOLUME 12, NUMBER 2, 2000 LINCOLN LABORATORY JOURNAL 267 • CAMP, MAYHAN, AND O’DONNELL Wideband Radar for Ballistic Missile Defense and Range-Doppler Imaging of Satellites

being light in weight compared to the weight of a those available in and TRADEX (both at warhead. Thus the fundamental approach to warhead L-band). Bandwidths that are 10% of the radar’s car- identification was to discriminate between warheads rier frequency are reasonably straightforward to and penaids on the basis of motion, size, and shape implement (e.g., 500 MHz at C-band or 1000 MHz differences caused by these weight constraints. In the at X-band). At the higher frequencies required for early days these decoys were designed to mimic the wide-bandwidth sensing, there is greater potential to dynamics and sensor signatures of warheads, and they characterize the radar target’s physical features, thus would challenge a defense radar’s ability to discrimi- providing another level of capability for discovering nate between similar targets in reentry. A second ap- attempts to disguise a target’s true nature. In addition, proach to warhead discrimination involved traffic de- higher operating frequencies are less vulnerable than coys, which consisted of a large number of smaller lower frequencies to the effects of nuclear blackout. objects designed to overwhelm and confuse a BMD Given these considerations, Lincoln Laboratory system. To defeat traffic decoys, the radar needed to initiated programs in the 1960s for the development dismiss a large number of less credible objects quickly. of wideband high-resolution, high-power radars op- Wideband radar operation helped with both of these erating at high microwave frequencies. The first radar discrimination tasks [2]. to be deployed was the ARPA-Lincoln C-band By the mid-1960s the TRADEX radar had proven Observables Radar, or ALCOR. It was designed as an invaluable as a sensor capable of highly accurate instrumentation radar to support research in BMD tracking of ballistic missile components from horizon wideband discrimination techniques, and it achieved break through midcourse and reentry. It could also operational status in 1970 at Kwajalein Atoll [3]. identify characteristic signatures of such components Another major thrust at Lincoln Laboratory in the through processing of radar returns from reentry bod- late 1950s and 1960s—an effort that eventually led ies and their accompanying ionized wakes. During to specialized wideband radar systems—was in the this same era many other field radars and laboratory area of satellite surveillance. During this era the research facilities were gathering volumes of data on space-defense establishment and NASA grew con- real and simulated ballistic missile components and cerned about the plethora of satellites and debris or- reentry wakes. As these data were analyzed, it became biting the earth. Lincoln Laboratory and others rec- clear that low-range-resolution radar systems operat- ognized that radar sensors beyond the capabilities of ing at the then-available frequencies were inadequate existing systems would be needed for space-object to unambiguously identify target signatures suitable identification. The use of wideband techniques could for discrimination in a BMD environment. allow specific scattering centers to be identified. In particular, effective discrimination against stra- These techniques, coupled with the development of tegic threats requires a means of dealing with poten- high pulse-repetition-frequency coherent waveforms, tially large numbers of small decoys and penaids at would make the generation of detailed radar images high altitudes well beyond the level where atmo- of orbiting space objects possible. spheric deceleration becomes a discriminator between The truth of this claim became abundantly clear heavy and lightweight objects. This need was espe- shortly after ALCOR came on line. The space-sur- cially acute in the 1960s, when BMD emphasis was veillance community had arranged to enlist ALCOR on wide-area defense of cities. It was recognized that in tracking satellites on a noninterference basis. Then discrimination radars with wide bandwidth and the in 1970 China launched its first satellite, which was corresponding fine range resolution would be able to observed by ALCOR. Analysis of ALCOR images of measure the lengths of objects, and quickly identify the booster rocket body revealed the dimensions of and eliminate radar targets substantially smaller than this object. This information was of great interest to warheads from consideration as threats. Furthermore, the Department of Defense because it gave insight the high operating frequencies required for wide- into the size and payload capacity of the forthcoming bandwidth radars would be of added benefit over Chinese ICBMs. This observation, which was a his-

268 LINCOLN LABORATORY JOURNAL VOLUME 12, NUMBER 2, 2000 • CAMP, MAYHAN, AND O’DONNELL Wideband Radar for Ballistic Missile Defense and Range-Doppler Imaging of Satellites toric first for the defense establishment, resulted in regions at the rear of the body. Such observations are satellite imaging missions becoming an integral part of great value in deriving information about a target’s of ALCOR operations. physical parameters, structural and heat-shield mate- More recently, the use of wideband phased-array rials, and the function of reentering objects, all of radars has greatly facilitated the transition of BMD which aid the discrimination process of distinguish- weapons systems from nuclear to non-nuclear, hit-to- ing warheads from decoys. kill interception techniques. These radars use modern In the above scenario, the radar produces a one-di- solid state microwave technology and high-capacity mensional range profile of the target. However, if the high-speed computers and signal processors, all of target is rotating about an axis that has a component which permit near-real-time imaging and discrimina- perpendicular to the radar line of sight, such that tion processing on a large number of targets. some scattering centers are moving toward the radar with respect to others that are moving away from it, Wideband Observables we can construct a one-dimensional cross-range pro- The distinguishing characteristic of a wideband radar file for each range cell through Doppler processing of is its fine range resolution, which is inversely propor- the radar returns. The range and cross-range profiles tional to the operating bandwidth. Such a radar sys- can then be combined to produce a two-dimensional tem has a range resolution that is a fraction of the lin- range-Doppler image of the complete body. We can ear dimensions of its intended targets. These radars analyze this image to yield body size, body shape, the generally operate at high frequencies, where wide- position and nature of scattering centers, the presence bandwidth waveforms are easier to implement. With of internal reflections, the rotation rates, and the rota- range resolution fine enough to encompass a target in tion axes for the object. In addition, these images can a significant number of resolution cells, it becomes provide valuable information on the nature of the possible to distinguish individual scattering centers, materials used in constructing the body, and informa- which occur at regions of physical discontinuity. A tion about antennas, apertures, and interior struc- ballistic missile warhead, for example, exhibits radar tures of such an object. reflections from the nose, body joints, and base, as Three-dimensional images can be generated from well as other points of discontinuity such as antenna the two-dimensional images by using a technique ports. To observe radar reflections from smaller dis- called extended coherent processing. With this tech- continuities, the radar must be able to operate at nique a series of range-Doppler images are collected short wavelengths, since discontinuities much smaller over a time period when the target presents different than a wavelength will in general produce low-inten- look angles to the radar. The series of range-Doppler sity reflected signals from the target. In addition, a images is then coherently processed and referenced to short wavelength is desirable for observing curved a particular look angle. The resulting three-dimen- surfaces, because when the wavelength is short com- sional images produce even greater detail of target fea- pared to the radius of curvature, the radar reflection is tures than the two-dimensional range-Doppler im- dominated by specular reflection, thus allowing a ages. The image of the damaged Skylab orbiting finer determination of the size and shape of corre- laboratory shown in Figure 1 is an example of this sponding surfaces. kind of processing. For an object that reenters the atmosphere and More recent advances in signal processing hard- generates an ionized wake, fine range resolution al- ware and computational speed have led to the genera- lows examination of the wake in thin slices, which re- tion and measurement of wideband observables in sults in the separation of reflections from different at- real time. These observables, which can be used for mospheric phenomena around the hard body, such as real-time BMD discrimination, include determina- the plasma layer at the nose or leading surface, the tion of body length, feature identification, and radar plasma sheath around the body, the boundary layers, images. Doppler processing and coherent phase-de- the shock fronts, and the development of turbulent rived range techniques permit real-time indications of

VOLUME 12, NUMBER 2, 2000 LINCOLN LABORATORY JOURNAL 269 • CAMP, MAYHAN, AND O’DONNELL Wideband Radar for Ballistic Missile Defense and Range-Doppler Imaging of Satellites

though research in this field was under way elsewhere during the 1960s, most notably at Rome Air Devel- opment Center. ALCOR was designed to have as large a bandwidth, sensitivity, range coverage, and tracking agility as contemporary technology would reasonably allow, to support its role in BMD research. It was located next to the TRADEX radar on Roi- Namur Island in the Kwajalein Atoll. Figure 2(a) shows the sixty-eight-foot-diameter ALCOR radome, and Figure 2(b) shows the forty-foot ALCOR an- tenna and its pedestal inside the radome. ALCOR operates at C-band (5672 MHz) with a signal bandwidth of 512 MHz that yields a range FIGURE 1. Simulated radar image (actual radar images of resolution of 0.5 m. (The ALCOR signal was heavily satellites remain classified) of the NASA Skylab orbiting laboratory, with a damaged solar panel on one side and a weighted to produce low range sidelobes with the partially deployed solar panel on the other. concurrent broadening of the resolution.) Its wide- bandwidth waveform is a 10-µsec pulse linearly swept macro- and micro-dynamic body motion, which may over the 512-MHz frequency range. High signal-to- offer clues to mass and mass distribution. Advances in noise ratio of 23 dB per pulse on a one-square-meter wideband phased-array radar design now make it pos- target at a range of a thousand kilometers is achieved sible to exploit wideband observables on multiple ob- with a high-power transmitter (3 MW peak and 6 jects in a missile complex. kW average) and a forty-foot-diameter antenna. Cross-range resolution comparable to range resolu- ALCOR tion is achievable with Doppler processing for targets The initial wideband radar research at Lincoln Labo- rotating at least 3° in the observation time. The pulse- ratory was embodied in a program called Wideband repetition frequency of this waveform is two hundred Observables. Initial objectives of this program were to pulses per second. verify the nature of wideband returns from realistic Processing 500-MHz-bandwidth signals in some targets and investigate technology challenges that conventional pulse-compression scheme was not fea- might arise in developing full-scale wideband radar sible with the technology available at the time of systems. To this end the Laboratory constructed a ALCOR’s inception. Consequently, it was necessary ground-based static radar range that included a small to greatly reduce signal bandwidth while preserving wideband radar and facilities for mounting and rotat- range resolution. This is accomplished in a time- ing real, replica, and simulated targets. The promising bandwidth exchange technique (originated at the Air- results of this program and the pressing need for a borne Instrument Laboratory, in Mineola, New York) fine range-resolution instrumentation radar at Kwaja- called stretch processing [4], which retains range reso- lein led to the decision to develop the ARPA-Lincoln lution but restricts range coverage to a narrow thirty- C-band Observables Radar, or ALCOR. meter window. In order to acquire and track targets ALCOR, shown in Figure 2, was the first high- and designate desired targets to the thirty-meter power, long-range, wideband field radar system. Lin- wideband window, ALCOR has a narrowband wave- coln Laboratory was the prime contractor for form with a duration of 10.2 µsec and bandwidth of ALCOR; a variety of industrial firms provided major 6 MHz. This narrowband waveform has a much subsystems and hardware (such as Hughes, Westing- larger 2.5-km range data window. house, Honeywell, and RCA). It became operational The ALCOR beamwidth is 5.2 milliradians, or at Kwajalein Atoll in 1970, and was probably the first 0.3°. This beamwidth, together with a high-perfor- wideband radar in the world to reach that status, al- mance antenna mount, enables ALCOR to produce

270 LINCOLN LABORATORY JOURNAL VOLUME 12, NUMBER 2, 2000 • CAMP, MAYHAN, AND O’DONNELL Wideband Radar for Ballistic Missile Defense and Range-Doppler Imaging of Satellites precision target trajectories and provide high-quality eter. Fortunately, ALCOR was located next to designation data to the other Kwajalein radars. This TRADEX and ALTAIR, which are much bigger ra- very narrow beam also caused some real challenges in dars with great search capability. target search and acquisition. Searching with a 5.2- The more difficult technical challenges included milliradians beam is akin to looking through a two- construction of the analog 10-µsec, 512-MHz-band- hundred-foot-long pipe that is only one foot in diam- width linear-FM-ramp generator. It required a high degree of timing stability, phase coherence, and fre- quency linearity to control range sidelobes to a level (a) of at least 35 dB below the peak response. The timing generator for controlling ramp triggering likewise re- quired a high degree of precision and stability to limit target tracking jitter to a small fraction of a range- resolution cell. Also, phase distortion in the transmitter and mi- crowave systems is held to a low level through careful design and matching of components, in order to real- ize low range sidelobes. Residual distortion is com- pensated by transversal equalizers in the wideband re- ceiver channels. Another feature that is part of the ALCOR radar design and unique to wideband sys- tems is compensation for waveguide dispersion. (b) ALCOR is one of the earliest radars to incorporate computers running real-time programs as an integral part of radar operations. Major radar control and tim- ing functions are under computer control, and the range and angle-tracking loops are closed through the computer. In recent years advances in signal process- ing technology applied to ALCOR have made it pos- sible to generate wideband images of multiple targets in multiple range windows in near real time. [3, 5]

TRADEX S-Band In 1972 the TRADEX UHF radar was replaced by an S-band system (built by RCA under the direction of Lincoln Laboratory) while retaining its L-band capa- bility. Although TRADEX S-band was the second wideband radar system to be brought on line by Lin- coln Laboratory, the approach taken to achieve fine range resolution was substantially different from that taken in ALCOR and later wideband systems. The S- band wideband waveform grew out of research on fre- quency-jumped pulses conducted by the Laboratory FIGURE 2. (a) The sixty-eight-foot-diameter ALCOR radome in the 1960s. The new set of S-band waveforms in- and (b) the forty-foot-diameter ALCOR antenna and its ped- cludes one with a signal bandwidth of 250 MHz. estal. ALCOR, which became operational at Kwajalein Atoll in 1970, was the first high-power, long-range, wideband field This bandwidth is achieved by transmitting a string, radar. or burst, of 3-µsec pulses; each pulse has a different

VOLUME 12, NUMBER 2, 2000 LINCOLN LABORATORY JOURNAL 271 • CAMP, MAYHAN, AND O’DONNELL Wideband Radar for Ballistic Missile Defense and Range-Doppler Imaging of Satellites

center frequency such that the bandwidth spanned by tions, researchers determined that a high-perfor- the burst is 250 MHz. The spacing and number of mance long-range radar imaging capability could be pulses in a burst is variable and the maximum repeti- provided by a new radar system added to Haystack, tion rate is one hundred bursts per second. Coherent the Lincoln Laboratory–built radio-astronomy, com- integration of a burst yields a range resolution of one munication, and radar research facility located in meter. Processing of this frequency-jumped-burst Tyngsboro, Massachusetts. The development of this type waveform at S-band is implemented post-mis- new radar capability for Haystack was sponsored by sion. Wideband target profiles have been constructed ARPA. After the facility was completed in 1978, op- post-mission and have helped demonstrate the utility erations were supported by the U.S. Air Force. of wideband observables for use as a target discrimi- The Haystack system has a number of features that nant at S-band. rendered this option extremely attractive. It has a large diameter (120 ft) antenna needed to achieve The Haystack Long-Range Imaging Radar deep-space ranges. The antenna was designed with From its earliest days of operation ALCOR was called Cassegrainian optics and could accommodate plug-in upon to track and image satellites, both domestic and radio-frequency (RF) boxes at the vertex of the pa- foreign. ALCOR’s historic imaging of the booster raboloidal dish. These boxes supported various com- rocket body of China’s first orbiting satellite in 1970 munications, radio astronomy, and radar functions. was followed by similar success in imaging the The interchangeable boxes are 8 × 8 × 12 ft, which is USSR’s Salyut-1 space station in 1971. The demon- large enough for the high-power (400 kW peak and stration of such imaging capability led to the estab- 200 kW average) new transmitter and associated mi- lishment of the Space Object Identification program crowave plumbing, feedhorns, and low-noise receiv- at Lincoln Laboratory. One of the many successes of ers needed for the long-range imaging radar.1 The this program was the imaging of NASA’s troubled Haystack antenna surface tolerance allows efficient Skylab orbiting laboratory shortly after its launch in operation up to 50 GHz, thus readily supporting op- 1973, as shown in Figure 1. Telemetry data from erating at X-band (10 GHz) with a bandwidth of Skylab showed that something was wrong with the 1024 MHz, and a resulting range resolution of 0.25 deployment of the solar panels. ALCOR images m. A system for interchanging ground-based elec- showed that one solar panel was missing and the tronics and power sources supporting the various RF other panel was only partially deployed, and there was boxes was already in place. Using an established facil- no evidence of the presence of the micrometeorite ity with existing antenna and prime power sources shield. This information was extremely useful to greatly reduced the cost of the new system, known as NASA in determining how to recover from this mis- the Long Range Imaging Radar, or LRIR [6]. hap and successfully continue the Skylab mission. The LRIR, which was completed in 1978, is ca- As the Space Object Identification program con- pable of detecting, tracking, and imaging satellites tinued, the capability to image satellites out to deep- out to synchronous-orbit altitudes, approximately space ranges soon became an important requirement. 40,000 km. The range resolution of 0.25 m is The limited sensitivity of ALCOR allowed the obser- matched by a cross-range resolution of 0.25 m for tar- vation of satellites only out to intermediate altitudes. gets that rotate at least 3.44° during the Doppler-pro- At the same time, researchers wanted to improve cessing interval. The wideband waveform is 256 µsec range resolution, extend range-window coverage, and

achieve higher pulse-repetition frequencies in order 1 to eliminate cross-range ambiguities in the images of Over the years several modifications have been made to the rapidly rotating space objects. Concurrent advances Haystack transmitter to make it more reliable. These have affected the radar’s average power and maximum pulse width. in signal processing technology gave promise that Currently, the maximum average power of the radar is 140 kW such improvements in radar techniques could readily and the maximum pulse width is 5 msec. With these values the be accommodated. After exploring a number of op- radar continues to perform all of its required missions.

272 LINCOLN LABORATORY JOURNAL VOLUME 12, NUMBER 2, 2000 • CAMP, MAYHAN, AND O’DONNELL Wideband Radar for Ballistic Missile Defense and Range-Doppler Imaging of Satellites

(a) (b)

FIGURE 3. (a) Artist’s rendition of the 120-foot Haystack antenna in its 150-foot radome; (b) the long-range imaging radar (LRIR) feed horn and transmitter/receiver radio-frequency (RF) box in its test dock in the Haystack radome. long and the bandwidth of 1024 MHz is generated by The transmitter and microwave subsystems also linear frequency modulation. The pulse-repetition presented design challenges. To achieve maximum frequency is 1200 pulses per second. The LRIR em- sensitivity the transmitter used four traveling-wave ploys a time-bandwidth exchange process similar to tubes (TWT) operating in parallel. Each TWT high- that of ALCOR to reduce signal bandwidth from power amplifier developed by Varian for LRIR gener- 1024 MHz to a maximum of 4 MHz, corresponding ates 100 kW peak and 50 kW average X-band power. to a range window of 120 m, while preserving the Combining and balancing the TWT outputs through range resolution of 0.25 m. To place a target in the the myriad of required microwave components while wideband window, we first acquire the target with a controlling phase errors was a major challenge. continuous-wave acquisition pulse that is variable in The front-end receiver amplifiers developed by length from 256 µsec (for short-range targets) to 50 Airborne Instrument Laboratory are cryogenically msec (for long-range targets). An acquired target is cooled parametric amplifiers, or paramps. These effi- then placed in active tracking by using 10-MHz- cient paramps are major contributors to Haystack’s bandwidth chirped pulses, again of variable length, high radar sensitivity, achieving a system noise tem- from 256 µsec to 50 msec. The wideband window is perature of 35 K. then designated to the target. Antenna beamwidth is Although not a directly related part of the research 0.05°. Figure 3(a) shows an artist’s rendition of the and development of LRIR, the Haystack antenna and 120-foot Haystack antenna in its 150-foot radome; its protective radome are impressive engineering ac- Figure 3(b) shows a photograph of the LRIR feed complishments. The Haystack 150-ft-diameter ra- horn and transmitter/receiver RF box in the Haystack dome, at the time it was built in the early 1960s, was radome. the largest rigid radome in the world. It was designed The LRIR design and construction at Haystack re- by the ESSCO Company of Concord, Massachusetts, quired special attention to waveform distortion, to survive 130-mph winds. phase control, phase stability, timing precision, and The Haystack antenna was also considered an en- timing stability (as did ALCOR). With the longer gineering feat at the time of its construction. It was wideband pulse width and advances in digital signal the first large structure designed by computer with a processor and computer technology, however, much finite-element representation of every strut in its of the signal processing and compensation has been structure. North American Aviation and the MIT accomplished with digital hardware under computer Civil Engineering Department accomplished this sig- control. nificant first.

VOLUME 12, NUMBER 2, 2000 LINCOLN LABORATORY JOURNAL 273 • CAMP, MAYHAN, AND O’DONNELL Wideband Radar for Ballistic Missile Defense and Range-Doppler Imaging of Satellites

cant advance in radar imaging capability, producing The Haystack Auxiliary Radar finer and sharper images of satellites than the Hay- When the LRIR became operational in 1978, the stack LRIR. It is also extremely useful in producing Haystack facility was being operated by a university detailed information for NASA on the locations, or- consortium known as the Northeast Radio Observa- bits, and characteristics of . tory Corporation, or NEROC. The primary mission of Haystack was radio astronomy. Lincoln Laboratory The Millimeter Wave Radar contracted with NEROC to use the facility for satel- The Millimeter Wave Radar, or MMW, was built at lite tracking and imaging for a thousand hours per Kwajalein by Lincoln Laboratory (with significant year. Eventually, U.S. Space Command and NASA contributions by the University of Massachusetts, recognized that this arrangement for sharing Hay- RCA, and Raytheon) to extend the general imaging stack was too restrictive to satisfy their needs. The and tracking capabilities of ALCOR and to develop restriction was especially limiting when there was millimeter-wavelength signatures of ballistic missile an immediate need to assess new or unexpected for- components. The MMW, shown in Figure 5, became

eign launches, or when space debris needed to be operational at Ka-band (35 GHz) in 1983, and W- catalogued. band (95.48 GHz) in 1985, sharing a paraboloidal The Haystack Auxiliary Radar (HAX) system, antenna with a diameter of forty-five feet. Both sys- shown in Figure 4, was conceived to eliminate this re- tems initially featured wideband waveforms of 1000- striction on observation time, and simultaneously MHz spread generated by linear FM, and achieved further improve range resolution and pulse-repetition 0.28-m range resolution. The transmitted pulse µ frequency. HAX operates at Ku-band with its own width is 50 sec at a maximum pulse-repetition rate forty-foot antenna, transmitter, RF hardware, and re- of 2000 pulses per second. The initial peak power at

ceiver, but it shares the LRIR control and signal and Ka-band was 60 kW and at W-band was 1.6 kW. data processing systems with Haystack. HAX, which A major thrust in the evolution of the MMW ra- began operation in 1993, is the first radar to have a dar has been to demonstrate the feasibility of candi- signal bandwidth of 2000 MHz, which improves the date real-time discrimination algorithms required for range resolution to 0.12 m. HAX represents a signifi- fire control and guidance of hit-to-kill BMD inter- ceptors. To this end, the radar was designed with a rigid mount and narrow beam to provide precise angle metric accuracy (≤50 µradians). Several con- tractors assisted the Laboratory in the development of the MMW radar, among them researchers at the Uni- versity of Massachusetts, RCA (now Lockheed Mar- tin), and Raytheon. The combination of metric accu- racy, wide bandwidth, and high Doppler-resolution capabilities makes MMW an excellent sensor for a real-time discrimination test bed. It provides ex- tremely accurate estimates of motion differences caused by mass imbalances on real and threat-like tar- gets and other feature-identification processing. Such a real-time test bed, called the Kwajalein Discrimina- tion System, was implemented and exercised at FIGURE 4. The Haystack radar site in Tyngsboro, Massachu- MMW from 1988 through 1992. This system has setts. The 150-foot LRIR Haystack radome and 120-foot an- demonstrated the feasibility of numerous real-time tenna are on the left, and the fifty-foot Haystack Auxiliary Ra- dar (HAX) radome, forty-foot HAX antenna, and equipment wideband discrimination algorithms. Following this building are on the right. successful demonstration, many of these processing

274 LINCOLN LABORATORY JOURNAL VOLUME 12, NUMBER 2, 2000 • CAMP, MAYHAN, AND O’DONNELL Wideband Radar for Ballistic Missile Defense and Range-Doppler Imaging of Satellites

cryogenic operation have led to a reduction in the re- ceiver noise figure, and a Gunn-effect diode interme- diate-power amplifier has boosted transmit power by driving the final TWT into saturation. Application of beam-waveguide optics techniques to the antenna has resulted in a reduction in transmit and receive losses, while simultaneously increasing transmit and receive isolation and power-handling capability. In all, these improvements provide a sensitivity improvement of almost two orders of magnitude, yielding the higher capability for metric tracking and range-Doppler im- aging on a variety of important targets. When these modifications are completed, the robust combination of 35-GHz and 95-GHz wideband capability on a FIGURE 5. The forty-five-foot millimeter-wave (MMW) an- tenna and its sixty-eight-foot radome under construction on single sensor will ensure MMW’s place as one of the Roi-Namur Island at Kwajalein. The MMW radar was built to world’s premier wideband-imaging systems [7, 8]. extend the general imaging and tracking capabilities of ALCOR and to develop millimeter-wavelength signatures of Cobra Dane and Cobra Judy ballistic missile components. Two of the most important sensors in the evolution of wideband BMD architecture and technology are the algorithms have been subsequently implemented per- Cobra Dane and Cobra Judy wideband phased-array manently into the MMW real-time system. radars. Both of these radars were built by the Beginning in the late 1980s, a significant effort Raytheon Corporation under support of the U.S. Air was carried out to further enhance the capabilities of Force and U.S. Army. Lincoln Laboratory played a the MMW radar. Advances in computer technology supporting role in the development of these phased- reached the point where real-time pulse compression array sensors, and it continues to provide essential at high pulse-repetition frequencies was possible. This support in upgrades and data processing. The Labora- capability results in improved sensitivity realized from tory has also been heavily involved in the analysis of real-time coherent and noncoherent pulse integration data. Developed to collect data on strategic ballistic at 35 GHz. In 1989 researchers implemented a digital missiles, these sensors were at the forefront of pulse-compression system that compresses every wideband phased-array technology. Cobra Dane, pulse in real time and subsequently improves coher- shown in Figure 6, was the first sensor to become op- ent processing at higher tracking rates. A state-of-the- erational, in 1976. Located on the island of , art beam-waveguide antenna feed replaced the more , in the western end of the Aleutian chain, Co- lossy conventional microwave-waveguide plumbing. bra Dane can observe the exo-atmospheric portions A second 35-GHz tube was also added, which of Russian missile flights into the Kamchatka Penin- doubled the average transmitted power. These modi- sula and the Pacific Ocean. fications increased the signal pulse detection range on The Cobra Judy mobile S-band phased-array ra- a one-square-meter target to over two thousand kilo- dar, located on the U.S. Naval ship Observation meters. System bandwidth was also increased to 2 Island, was subsequently developed and became op- GHz, resulting in a range resolution of about 0.10 m. erational in 1981 to provide improved global ballistic The 95-GHz MMW system is now undergoing a missile data collection on a mobile sea-based plat- major upgrade. Recent advances in MMW solid state form. An X-band wideband dish radar added to Co- technology, combined with state-of-the-art quasiopti- bra Judy became operational in 1984. The shift to X- cal feed elements, have resulted in significant in- band was to enhance resolution and imaging creases in system sensitivity. Mixer diodes capable of capability relative to S-band, and subsequently to

VOLUME 12, NUMBER 2, 2000 LINCOLN LABORATORY JOURNAL 275 • CAMP, MAYHAN, AND O’DONNELL Wideband Radar for Ballistic Missile Defense and Range-Doppler Imaging of Satellites

(b) developed the data processing and data distribu- tion architecture, including calibrations and the data processing software and methodology; (c) developed and applied key analysis tools tailored for BMD data exploitation; and (d) continues to participate in the operational use of these sensors. Some of the analysis tools tailored for BMD data exploitation are synthetic bandwidth expansion for enhanced range resolution, extended coherent processing for three-dimensional imaging, macro- and micro-motion-dynamics pro- cessing techniques, and enhanced spectral estimation for feature identification. The Laboratory continues FIGURE 6. The wideband phased-array Cobra Dane radar, located on the island of Shemya, Alaska, in the western end to participate in the operational use of these sensors of the Aleutian chain. In this location, Cobra Dane can ob- through Cobra Judy mission planning, ballistic mis- serve the exo-atmospheric portions of Russian missile sile profile development and operator training, Cobra flights into the Kamchatka Peninsula and the Pacific Ocean. Judy upgrades and enhancements, and the develop- ment of data interpretation and analysis techniques. support the BMD community in developing a na- Development of the Cobra Dane and Cobra Judy tional missile defense system that would incorporate sensors required advances in two key technology ar- an X-band for interceptor fire control. eas: wideband wide-angle phased-array scanning cov- Cobra Judy, shown in Figure 7, remains to this date erage, and automated target classification and data the world’s largest mobile phased-array sensor. collection. Lincoln Laboratory’s support of the development and use of these high-quality instrumentation radars Cobra Gemini involved a number of significant contributions. Spe- Over the past few years, many nations have begun to cifically, Lincoln Laboratory (a) developed the re- obtain tactical ballistic missiles. The recent Gulf War quirements and specifications for each of the sensors illustrated that these missiles can be important politi- and validated sensor performance after deployment; cal weapons when equipped with explosive warheads.

FIGURE 7. The wideband phased-array Cobra Judy radar on the U.S. Naval ship Observation Island. The S-band phased-array radar is at the stern of the ship; the mechanically scanned dish just forward of it is the X-band radar antenna. The Cobra Judy is the world’s largest mobile phased-array sensor.

276 LINCOLN LABORATORY JOURNAL VOLUME 12, NUMBER 2, 2000 • CAMP, MAYHAN, AND O’DONNELL Wideband Radar for Ballistic Missile Defense and Range-Doppler Imaging of Satellites

If these missiles are coupled with a chemical, bacte- missile dynamics as well as the characterization of ob- riological, or nuclear weapons capability, they present jects in the missile threat complex. an extremely threatening weapons system. Current The Cobra Gemini radar was designed to acquire a development of theater-missile defense systems such –5-dBsm (decibels relative to one square meter) target as Theater High Altitude Area Defense requires data at a range of a thousand kilometers over a 20°-wide on these tactical missile systems for use in fire-con- horizon-surveillance fence. The thousand-kilometer trol-radar discrimination functions. requirement for detection range is adequate for de- In 1996, to meet the defense community’s global tecting tactical ballistic missiles over a wide range of requirements for radar signature data for theater-mis- scenarios. Surveillance and target acquisition are per- sile defense, Lincoln Laboratory, with sponsorship formed at S-band by using the radar’s mechanical from the U.S. Air Force Electronic Systems Center, scanning dish antenna, which has a fifteen-foot aper- initiated development of an operational prototype of ture. The radar has 50 kW of average power at S-band a transportable instrumentation radar called Cobra and 35 kW at X-band. The antenna uses a dual-band Gemini. Cobra Gemini is a sensor designed to collect feed to transmit both S-band and X-band energy metric and signature data on tactical theater-ballistic- from the same dish. After acquisition, tracked objects missile targets. Since an operational radar must re- are classified in real time so that high-resolution data spond to a wide variety of launch locations, a sensor can be collected on high-priority objects. In the like the Cobra Gemini must be both air- and ground- wideband mode, the radar has a bandwidth of 1 GHz transportable. It must also be capable of worldwide at X-band and 300 MHz at S-band. These band- operation on land and deck-mounted operation on widths correspond to range resolutions of approxi- ships at sea. Figure 8 shows the Cobra Gemini radar mately 0.25 m and 0.80 m, respectively. implemented in a sea-based configuration on the In- The purpose of the Cobra Gemini program was to vincible, a U.S. Naval T-AGOS ship. produce a prototype radar with a short delivery The signature data collection requirements include schedule and low risk of delays in development. Addi- wideband and narrowband radar data at both S-band tional radars of this type can then be more confi- and X-band. High pulse-repetition-rate, wide-band- dently produced by industry with this baseline de- width data are collected at both X-band and S-band sign. The Cobra Gemini prototype completed its frequencies to support detailed analysis of tactical ground-based test and evaluation in July 1998. The

FIGURE 8. The Cobra Gemini radar (large radome) in its sea-based configuration on the Invincible, a U.S. Naval T-AGOS ship. A transportable sensor such as Cobra Gemini is designed to assist in the detection and discrimination of tactical theater ballistic missiles.

VOLUME 12, NUMBER 2, 2000 LINCOLN LABORATORY JOURNAL 277 • CAMP, MAYHAN, AND O’DONNELL Wideband Radar for Ballistic Missile Defense and Range-Doppler Imaging of Satellites

Wideband Range-Doppler Phase- Narrowband Bandwidth Ultra- Analysis (low pulse- imaging derived expansion wideband Time techniques repetition range frequency)

1960s ~1970 ~1975 ~1983 ~1990 ~1997

RCS classifier Wideband algorithm Size/shape Microdynamics (peak, mean) Length (wobble) Macrodynamics Discrimination Narrowband RCS Ballistic coefficient using Time algorithms Ballistic coefficient Polarization phase-derived range Ballistic coefficient

FIGURE 9. The evolution of wideband radar data-analysis techniques and their relationship to the development of ballistic-mis- sile-defense discrimination algorithms. As wideband radar technology has evolved, providing higher pulse-repetition frequen- cies, wider bandwidths, and higher operating frequencies, the analyst’s ability to infer more information about a target under observation by the radar has increased significantly.

radar was then installed on the Invincible. The proto- resolution of wideband coherent radar data. The first type achieved operational capability on 1 March technique uses modern spectral-analysis methods for 1999 after successful completion of its sea-based test improving resolution relative to the restrictions of and evaluation. conventional Fourier processing. These spectral methods extrapolate signals in a radar-frequency di- Advances in Wideband Data Analysis mension by a process called bandwidth extrapolation. Lincoln Laboratory has played a major role in the de- Each wideband pulse return includes the target fre- velopment of data-analysis techniques for use in ex- quency response over the chirped bandwidth. Mod- ploiting data collected by wideband radars on strate- ern spectral-estimation techniques are then applied to gic and theatre ballistic missiles. The evolution in extend this frequency response synthetically outside complexity of discrimination technology has directly this band to a factor ranging from two to three times followed the evolution of capability in computer pro- the bandwidth. This expanded pulse return is then re- cessing. Figure 9 illustrates this evolution of analysis compressed to provide finer range resolution (for techniques over time and their relationship to the de- practical signal-to-noise ratios, an improvement of a velopment of discrimination algorithms. As wide- factor of two to three in resolution is generally real- band radar technology has evolved, providing higher ized), and when applied to radar imaging, it provides pulse-repetition frequencies, wider bandwidth, and much improved sharpness in the radar image [9]. higher RF operating frequencies, the analyst’s ability The second technique uses signal processing mod- to infer more information about a target under inter- els that correspond to rotating-point motion. The rogation by the radar has increased significantly. De- models allow extended coherent processing over wide velopments in computer processing have led to subse- target-rotation angles, resulting in improved Doppler quent real-time implementation of algorithms based (cross-range) resolution [10]. For sufficiently large on these analysis techniques. resolution angles and for constant-amplitude scatter- More recently, Lincoln Laboratory has developed ing centers, extended coherent processing also im- and exploited several techniques for improving the proves the range resolution. Extended coherent pro-

278 LINCOLN LABORATORY JOURNAL VOLUME 12, NUMBER 2, 2000 • CAMP, MAYHAN, AND O’DONNELL Wideband Radar for Ballistic Missile Defense and Range-Doppler Imaging of Satellites cessing essentially aligns and stores radar pulses ob- tained over longer time spans as compared to conven- REFERENCES tional imaging. When combined with bandwidth ex- trapolation, extended coherent processing can achieve 1. M.L. Stone and G.P. Banner, “Radars for the Detection and Tracking of Ballistic Missiles, Satellites, and Planets,” Linc. enhanced resolution in both range and Doppler Lab. J., in this issue. (cross-range) spaces. For targets where the radar view- 2. P.A. Ingwersen and W.Z. Lemnios, “Radars for Ballistic Missile ing angle is at a constant aspect angle to the target’s Defense Research,” Linc. Lab. J., in this issue. 3. M. Axelbank, W.W. Camp, V.L. Lynn, and J. Margolin, angular-momentum vector, extended coherent pro- “ALCOR—A High-Sensitivity Radar with One-Half-Meter cessing provides high-quality three-dimensional radar Range Resolution,” IEEE 71 International Conv. Dig., New York, 22–25 Mar. 1971, pp. 112–113. images. 4. M.I. Skolnik, Introduction to Radar Systems, 2nd ed. (McGraw- More recently, the Laboratory has explored the Hill, New York, 1980), p. 432. possibility of achieving ultrawideband resolution by 5. R.K. Avent, J.D. Shelton, and P. Brown, “The ALCOR C- Band Imaging Radar,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 38 (3), using data only over sparse subbands of the full ultra- 1996, pp. 16–27. wide bandwidth. We can view this technique as a gen- 6. E.C. Freeman, ed., MIT Lincoln Laboratory: Technology in the National Interest (Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington, Mass., eralization of bandwidth extrapolation to multiple 1995), pp. 118–119. bands [10]. Ultrawideband’s potential as a discrimi- 7. M.D. Abouzahra and R.K. Avent, “The 100-kW Millimeter- nation tool is much more robust, as scatterer-feature Wave Radar at the Kwajalein Atoll,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 36 (2), 1994, pp. 7–19. identification on a specific target is inherently more 8. J.C. McHarg, M.D. Abouzahra, and R.F. Lucey, “95-Ghz accurate when observed over a much wider band- Millimeter Wave Radar,” SPIE 2842, 1996, pp. 494–500. 9. K.M. Cuomo, “A Bandwidth Extrapolation Technique for width. Improved Range Resolution of Coherent Radar Data,” Project Report CJP-60, Rev. 1, Lincoln Laboratory (4 Dec. 1992), Summary DTIC #ADA-258462. 10. K.M. Cuomo, J.E. Piou, and J.T. Mayhan, “Ultra-Wideband Lincoln Laboratory has played a pioneering and Coherent Processing,” Linc. Lab. J. 10 (2), 1997, pp. 203–222. dominant role in the development of high-power wideband radar systems and technology. As the capa- bility of wideband radars has progressed, the Labora- tory has continued to develop high-speed signal pro- cessing devices and systems, and more sophisticated analysis techniques. These new developments permit the formation of dynamic three-dimensional images of multiple targets in near real time, and have resulted in the development of discrimination algorithms ap- plied to real-time ballistic missile defense. As a result of the Laboratory’s research and devel- opment efforts in wideband radar, signal processors, and data analysis, the original promise of wideband systems has been fulfilled to an extent unforeseen thirty years ago. Today’s wideband systems reveal in- formation across the full spectrum of physical at- tributes of observed targets. The true test of the value of this Lincoln Laboratory development is that today’s ballistic-missile-defense radars, such as the Theater High Altitude Area Defense radar and the National Missile Defense Ground-Based Radar Pro- totype, feature substantial wideband capabilities that are critical to meeting their challenging missions.

VOLUME 12, NUMBER 2, 2000 LINCOLN LABORATORY JOURNAL 279 • CAMP, MAYHAN, AND O’DONNELL Wideband Radar for Ballistic Missile Defense and Range-Doppler Imaging of Satellites

 .   .   . ’ is the former leader of the is a senior member of the is a senior staff member in the Radar Technology group and technical staff, and former Sensor Systems and Measure- assistant head of the Radar leader of the Sensor Systems ment group. His recent re- Measurements division. He and Measurements group. He search has involved the design received a B.S.E.E. degree received a B.S. degree from of the Cobra Gemini radar from Virginia Polytechnic Purdue University, and M.S. and the modernization and Institute, and joined Lincoln and Ph.D. degrees from The remoting of the range instru- Laboratory in 1957. After Ohio State University, all in mentation radars at the initial assignments in the electrical engineering. In 1969, Kwajalein Missile Range. He development of radar receiver he joined the University of received an S.B. degree in circuitry and radar beacons, he Akron as an associate profes- physics from MIT in 1963, became active in radar systems sor. Since joining Lincoln and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in analysis and design, contribut- Laboratory in 1973, he has physics from the University of ing to early concepts of ballis- worked in the areas of satellite Pennsylvania in 1964 and tic missile defense (BMD) and communications antennas, 1970. Before joining Lincoln satellite surveillance by radar. adaptive antenna design and Laboratory in 1973, he was a He was a member of the team performance evaluation, spa- member of the technical staff that evaluated the Ballistic tial spectral estimation using of the Radar Technology Missile Early Warning System multiple-beam antennas, radar department at the MITRE Site I acceptance tests in system design, radar data Corp. In 1983, he left Lincoln Thule, , and a analysis, and electromagnetic Laboratory to become man- member of the design team scattering from actively loaded ager of Radar Systems Engi- that established performance targets. He played a major role neering at RCA (now requirements for the first in the design of the Cobra Lockheed Martin) in satellite surveillance radar. At Gemini radar. At the Moorestown, New Jersey. In Kwajalein in the early 1960s Laboratory’s Kwajalein field 1986, he joined the Interna- he was responsible for the site, he served one four-year tional Signal and Control high-power UHF/L-band tour as leader of the ALTAIR Group in Lancaster, Pennsyl- TRADEX radar. He was deep-space tracking radar and vania, as vice president, chief appointed associate leader of a second tour as site manager scientist, where he was respon- the Range Measurements of the Lincoln Laboratory sible for corporate research and group in 1964 and leader of program. He has published development and long-range the Radar Technology group in extensively in the areas of technical planning for the 1969. During these years his nonlinear interactions of group. In 1989 he returned to group managed the implemen- electromagnetic waves in Lincoln Laboratory. He is a tation of ALTAIR at Kwajalein plasma media, adaptive an- senior member of the IEEE and an extensive modification tenna design, spectral estima- and is a present member and of the TRADEX radar. In the tion techniques, and electro- past chairman of the IEEE late 1960s he was project magnetic scattering. He twice Aerospace and Electronic leader for the ALCOR received the R.W.P. King Systems Society, Radar Sys- wideband radar at Kwajalein, Award from the IEEE Transac- tems Panel, and is a member and in the mid-1970s he tions on Antennas and Propa- of the Board of Governors of directed the development of gation Society (AP-S) for the IEEE Aerospace and the Long Range Imaging papers published in the IEEE Electronic Systems Society. Radar, used for imaging satel- Transactions on Antennas and His interests include classical lites out to synchronous-orbit Propagation, and has previ- music and amateur radio. altitude. He retired from ously served as a distinguished Lincoln Laboratory in 1992. lecturer for AP-S.

280 LINCOLN LABORATORY JOURNAL VOLUME 12, NUMBER 2, 2000