DOCSLIB.ORG

Fort Greely, Alaska

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fort Greely, Alaska DCN: 9873 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (GMD) Fort Greely, Alaska Presented by: Mr. Tom Devanney Deputy Program Director Ground-Based Midcourse Defense 26 April 2004 Draft Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only DO NOT RELEASE Under FOIA FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Mission And Tasks “The Defense Department… Shall Proceed With Plans to Deploy a Set of Initial Missile Defense Capabilities Beginning in 2004.” President George W. Bush NSPD-23, 16 DEC 02 BMDS Mission • Provide Missile Defense Capabilities to COCOMs Tasks • Build, Test, and Verify an Initial Defensive Operations Capability • Place the BMDS on Alert • Execute Concurrent Testing and Defensive Operations • Continue Development to Incrementally Improve Capability BottomBottom Line:Line: FieldField anan InitialInitial MissileMissile DefenseDefense CapabilityCapability TEAMTEAM GMD Forging America’s Shield 7/7/2005 6:35 PM FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY GM-04-01-02106-R27-(TABS Installation Familiar Brief)-(04-26-04)-(U) 2 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY MDA – Fort Greely • Public Law 107-20: (July 24, 2001) – Sec. 1207: The Secretary of Defense may retain all or a portion of Fort Greely, AK as the Secretary deems necessary to meet military operations logistics and personnel support requirements for missile defense. • Memo - SECDEF to Director, BMDO (Now MDA): – Delegates authority to retain portions of Fort Greely, AK to meet Missile Defense Requirements to Director, BMDO • Memo for DASA (I&H) Attn: Mr. Paul Johnson: (10 Aug 01) – BMDO determined that specified buildings and land at Fort Greely are necessary to create a Missile Defense Systems Test Bed – Asks the Army to withdraw the surplus property determination and grant BMDO’s request for excess property – Identifies the buildings and land required to support the Missile Defense System Test Bed and foreseeable missile defense needs – Proposes that the Army retain jurisdiction of the Fort Greely portion of the Missile Defense System Test Bed TEAMTEAM GMD Forging America’s Shield 7/7/2005 6:35 PM FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY GM-04-01-02106-R27-(TABS Installation Familiar Brief)-(04-26-04)-(U) 3 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY GMD Program (U) Thule, Greenland* Cobra Dane Upgraded Early In-Flight Defense Interceptor In-Flight GMD Fire Warning Radar Defense Communication In-Flight GMD Fire *If approved by Danish/ Interceptor Control Node In-FlightIn-Flight InterceptorInterceptor Interceptors SatelliteSatellite System Data Interceptors Interceptor Control Node Greenland Governments Interceptors Terminal 20 Interceptors Communication Target CommunicationsCommunications CommunicationCommunication System Data SystemSystem System Data Defense SystemTerminal Data Satellite Terminal Kodiak Ft. Greely Terminal Communications System 3rd Site – 10 Interceptors Fylingdales - U.K. Eareckson Air Station DSP/STSS External System Pacific Ocean Buckley Interface (ESI) AFB Upgraded Early GBMC2GFC/C Warning Radar Link 16 Aegis BMD Radar / ESI • USS Lake Erie, Shiloh, Boulder Eastern United and Port Royal States In-Flight Interceptor Melbourne, FL Communication System Data In-Flight Terminal GMD Communications Interceptor Communication Network Connects System Data All Components Terminal Colorado Springs Reagan Test Site (Testing) GMDGMD Fire Fire Control Control Node Node RemotedRemoted WorkstationsWorkstations (At(At Schriever Schriever AFB) AFB) (At(At Cheyenne Cheyenne Mtn Mtn Ops Ops Ctr) Ctr) Ground-Based In-Flight Interceptor Radar - Prototype Communication System Legend Data Terminal PacificAdak, Alaska Ocean Beale AFB Vandenberg AFB Test In-FlightIn-Flight InterceptorInterceptor IDO 2004 CommunicationCommunication SystemSystem Data Terminal IDO 2005 In-Flight Interceptor Upgraded Early Communication System Interceptor GMD Fire Control Node Sea-BasedSea-Based TestTest Interceptors (For Flight Tests) XBRXBR (SBX)(SBX) Warning Radar Data Terminal Target Beyond GM-0010 TEAMTEAM GMD Forging America’s Shield 7/7/2005 6:35 PM FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY GM-04-01-02106-R27-(TABS Installation Familiar Brief)-(04-26-04)-(U) 4 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Why Alaska? (U) Berlin 3,600 Moscow Moscow 3,900 3,800 Washington, DC North China Russia Pole Canada 2,000 Beijing 3,500 2,900 Los Angeles Seoul 3,300 Ft Greely Tokyo 2,200 3,400 Hawaii TEAMTEAM GMD Forging America’s Shield 7/7/2005 6:35 PM FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY GM-04-01-02106-R27-(TABS Installation Familiar Brief)-(04-26-04)-(U) 5 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Why Alaska? (U) Hawaii Washington TEAMTEAM GMD Forging America’s Shield 7/7/2005 6:35 PM FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY GM-04-01-02106-R27-(TABS Installation Familiar Brief)-(04-26-04)-(U) 6 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Alaska’s Advantages (U) The Ideal Location …. to Protect All 50 States … Attacks From East or West • Fort Greely (Army Host Installation) – Optimal Location for Missile Flyout – Geotechnical Aspects Ideal for Missile Silos – Sparse Surrounding Population • Eareckson Air Station (Air Force Host Installation) – Ideal Radar Location – Leverages Existing Site & Infrastructure TEAMTEAM GMD Forging America’s Shield 7/7/2005 6:35 PM FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY GM-04-01-02106-R27-(TABS Installation Familiar Brief)-(04-26-04)-(U) 7 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY GMD IDO Architecture DSCS MILSTAR WPAC FORT GREELY EARECKSON COBRA DANE DSCS EPAC BEALE JNIC SCHRIEVER VANDENBERG Aegis TEAMTEAM HAWAII GMD Forging America’s Shield 7/7/2005 6:35 PM FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY GM-04-01-02106-R27-(TABS Installation Familiar Brief)-(04-26-04)-(U) 8 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY GMD Schedule (U) FT-04-1 FTG- FTG- FTG-04 04-2 04-3 -4 A/B ConcurrentConcurrent SBX Integration DGT-1 OperationsOperations IGT-3 IGT-4 IGT-5 andand TestTest 3 Fylingdales UEWR Legend Additional GBI Greely Sensors Test System Integration and Checkout (SICO) 1 365 STRR Construction Training/Exercises 1st Site Integration 3 Embedded Test Capability Last Site Integration GFC/C Checkout InitialInitial Log Support Completed 3 IGT-2 FT-04-1 DefensiveDefensive *EKV Did Not Separate ESI-CD Integration m Beale UEWR Integration Operations is Operations l Lease Fort Greely GFC/C Ring-Link GBI Greely a AK Circuit/CONUS Fiber Ring Shemya IDT GBI VAFB e Greely IDT Integration R Integration MILSAT COM st Greely GFC/C Node3 Integrated e Power Plant Upgrade VAFB IDT T 33 IDO / Missile Storage Igloos Entry Control Station IFT- IFT- e 13C nc 13B3 HW and SW e BV 6 BV 5 HW and SW d 3 – IFT- fi ESI-AEGIS BMD ESI-DSP Integration 3– 14 On Schedule IDOIDO n 20/20 IDT Integration 3 o Intg at RTS JNIC GFC/C Node C 3 3 ConfigurationConfiguration IDT BOD For IDO Initial Training 3 3 3 CONUS Fiber-Optic Ring 3 GFC/C GCN DSCS3 TB IGT-1 IFT-10 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Initiate * X 3 GMD Synchronization Initiate OSC Demo Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct COS 3 CLE 2.6 FQT IFT 15 BAM O/D IFT 15 GBI Emplace 3 ESI 4A.1BM-1 Complete w/FQT IFT 15 EKV O/D GFC 4A.2.x FQT BV+ SW FQT Construction, Eareckson OSSC Act IFT 15 PAM O/D GFC 4A. 2.x BM1 Construction, IFT 14 MK2 OBV Silo Refurb IDC-5 GB I Complete I FT 14 GB I Emplace New GED EAS IDT GCN HW Del IDC-5 GBI Beale E T Node SRR GFC 4A .2.x ER IFT 15 Booster O/D OSSC Act BV+ Test FOF (VAFB/RTS) ET 3.3 FQT Emplacemen t CD GCN HW Del 3 VAFB ET ICOR IDC-6 BAM O/D 3 VAFB ET Node SRR A vail to GFC/C IDC-6 PAM O/D ESI 4.1 FQT IFT 13C GBI E mplace VAFB CLE Lab I&CO IDC-6 EKV O/D IDC-6 B &S O/D 3 VA FB CLE I&CO 3 CL E 2.5 FQT IDC-2 BAM O/D IDC-6 GBI Complete GBI SIM (EK V,CLE, Booster) IDC-4 E KV O/D CLE /SILO (2) ICOR ET 3.2.2 PCIL-2 BM1 IFT 14 Bo ost er O/ D Continue Beale OSSC Act OBV 1.12 SW Pre FQT IDC-2 B&S O/D IDC-2 GBI Complete IDC-4 B& S PAM OD IDC-7 EKV O/D Continue OBV 1.12 SW FQT IDC-2 EKV O/D MK2 OBV Silo Refurb IDC-4 GBI Complete IDC-7 BAM O/D CLE LAB 2.5 FQT IDC-3 GBI Emplacemen t Cobra Dane GCN HW Del JNIC, SPAWAR, FGA GFC I&CO IDC-1 GBI Complete IDC-2 GBI E mplacement IDC-5 B&S OD CD 2.4 .1 FQT VAFB ET HW Del IDC-1 B&S O/D IDC-2 PAM O/D Wkstation Input IFT 14 PAM O/ D IDC-5 E KV O/D IDC-5 P AM OD 3 RITE SW 1.3 FQT MK1 OBV Silo Refurb IDC-5 BAM O/D 3 FGA IDT ICOR JNIC, SPAWAR, FGA GFC ICOR STRR GMD SIM 02 CLE LAB I&CO IDC-4 BAM O/D UEWR DT&E FGA GCN ICOR UEWR B5. 2.2 FQT IDC-1 PAM O/D JNIC ET 3.2. 1 ICOR IDC-3 GBI Complete IDC-4 GBI Emplacemen t to CMOC FGA ESI ICOR EAS IDT GCN I&CO IDC-3 EKV O/D IDC-3 B&S OD Testing 3 3 FGA GF C ICOR IDC-1 E KV O/D I DC-1 GBI Emplacemen t UEWR BM1 Comp Testing IAR 3.0 GFC Rel Rev (RR) 3 3 IDC-1 BAM O/D CLE LA B 2.6 BM1 IDC-3 PAM OD IAR 3.0 GFC Release Report IAR 3.0 IDT RR Cobra Da ne ICOR IDC-3 B AM O/D IAR 3.0 IDT Release Report IAR 3.0 ESI RR Shemya IDT I&CO Beale E T Node ICOR I AR 3 .0 ESI Release Rep ort Readiness & Control Bldg Mechanical Electrical Building (MEB) (Both Enclosed) FGA E T Node ICOR Shemya GCN ICOR Shemya IDT ICOR I AR 3 .0 GC N R elease R epo rt SSC0 3 SSC0 5 (FGA) SSC0 5 (S hemya) SSCO 6 (Beale) SSC0 5 (CD) SSCO 6 (VAFB) SICO-3 SICO 5 SICO 6 3 IGT-2 IGT-3 3 IAR-3 IGT-7 Manuf acturing Capability Assessment Parts, Materials, & Process Management Risk Management IFT-7 IFT-8 IFT-9 SI CO 6 VAFB CLE Auth to Connect SICO 3 TRR IFT 13C ILC VAFB SSCO TRR IFT 13C GBI S RR IFT 15 PAM SRR VAFB SSCO PTRR IFT 15 ILC IFT 13C TRR IFT 13C FRR SICO 5 PTRR IFT 15 TRR I FT 13C TL V LRR SICO 3 Test Rpt I FT 14 FRR I FT 15 GB I SRR JR E F QT IFT 14 PTRR IFT 14 TLV LRR Beale SSCO TRR SICO 3 PTRR IGT-2 QLR I FT 14 TRR IFT 16A FGA SSCO TRR IGT-2 PTRR IFT 15 PTRR IFT 14 ILC IFT 16A PTRR IFT 16A MRR IGT-2 RFR Comp lete IFT 14 MRR SICO 6 Beale SSCO PTRR TL V IGT-2 TRR IFT 15 TLV LRR IFT 15 FRR IFT 15 MRR SICO 5 I nterim Test Rpt to KLC 3 3 3 IFT 14 GBI SRR SICO 6 VAFB RIDT Auth to Connect IFT 16A TRR Basic 3 3 3 3 IFT 14 Aut h to Connect IFT 17/18 Gov’t Threat Data Pkg Basic 3 IFT 14 PAM SRR SICO 5 TRR IFT 14 TLV to KLC IGT-3 PTRR IFT 15 Gov’t Threat Data Pkg SICO 5 FGA IDT Auth to Connect IFT 16 Auth to Connect SICO 5 Shemya SSCO PTRR SICO 6 P TRR IFT 15 Auth to Connect SICO 6 TRR IFT 15 ET 3.2.1 I STC-1 B M 1 CMOC Basic S ICO 5 Shemya SSCO TRR IFT 15 TLV to KLC IGT-3 TRR UEWR Opera tor Trg Ft.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hearing National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 Oversight of Previously Authorized Programs Committee on Armed S
    i [H.A.S.C. No. 112–111] HEARING ON NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013 AND OVERSIGHT OF PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED PROGRAMS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES HEARING ON FISCAL YEAR 2013 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION BUDGET REQUEST FOR MISSILE DEFENSE HEARING HELD MARCH 6, 2012 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 73–437 WASHINGTON : 2012 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, http://bookstore.gpo.gov. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center, U.S. Government Printing Office. Phone 202–512–1800, or 866–512–1800 (toll-free). E-mail, [email protected]. SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES MICHAEL TURNER, Ohio, Chairman TRENT FRANKS, Arizona LORETTA SANCHEZ, California DOUG LAMBORN, Colorado JAMES R. LANGEVIN, Rhode Island MO BROOKS, Alabama RICK LARSEN, Washington MAC THORNBERRY, Texas MARTIN HEINRICH, New Mexico MIKE ROGERS, Alabama JOHN R. GARAMENDI, California JOHN C. FLEMING, M.D., Louisiana C.A. DUTCH RUPPERSBERGER, Maryland SCOTT RIGELL, Virginia BETTY SUTTON, Ohio AUSTIN SCOTT, Georgia TIM MORRISON, Professional Staff Member LEONOR TOMERO, Professional Staff Member AARON FALK, Staff Assistant (II) C O N T E N T S CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF HEARINGS 2012 Page HEARING: Tuesday, March 6, 2012, Fiscal Year 2013 National Defense Authorization Budget Request for Missile Defense ................................................................... 1 APPENDIX: Tuesday, March 6, 2012 .......................................................................................... 33 TUESDAY, MARCH 6, 2012 FISCAL YEAR 2013 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION BUDGET REQUEST FOR MISSILE DEFENSE STATEMENTS PRESENTED BY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Sanchez, Hon. Loretta, a Representative from California, Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Strategic Forces .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX a Document Index
    APPENDIX A Document Index Alaska Aviation System Plan Document Index - 24 April 2008 Title Reference # Location / Electronic and/or Paper Copy Organization / Author Pub. Date Other Comments / Notes / Special Studies AASP's Use 1-2 AASP #1 1 WHPacific / Electronic & Paper Copies DOT&PF / TRA/Farr Jan-86 Report plus appendix AASP #2 DOT&PF / TRA-BV Airport 2 WHPacific / Electronic & Paper Copies Mar-96 Report plus appendix Consulting Statewide Transportation Plans Use 10 -19 2030 Let's Get Moving! Alaska Statewide Long-Range http://dot.alaska.gov/stwdplng/areaplans/lrtpp/SWLRTPHo 10 DOT&PF Feb-08 Technical Appendix also available Transportation Policy Plan Update me.shtml Regional Transportation Plans Use 20-29 Northwest Alaska Transportation Plan This plan is the Community Transportation Analysis -- there is 20 http://dot.alaska.gov/stwdplng/areaplans/nwplan.shtml DOT&PF Feb-04 also a Resource Transportation Analysis, focusing on resource development transportation needs Southwest Alaska Transportation Plan 21 http://dot.alaska.gov/stwdplng/areaplans/swplan.shtml DOT&PF / PB Consult Sep-04 Report & appendices available Y-K Delta Transportation Plan 22 http://dot.alaska.gov/stwdplng/areaplans/ykplan.shtml DOT&PF Mar-02 Report & appendices available Prince William Sound Area Transportation Plan 23 http://dot.alaska.gov/stwdplng/areaplans/pwsplan.shtml DOT&PF / Parsons Brinokerhoff Jul-01 Report & relevant technical memos available Southeast Alaska Transportation Plan http://www.dot.state.ak.us/stwdplng/projectinfo/ser/newwave 24 DOT&PF Aug-04
    [Show full text]
  • Shemyaafr,Alaska 1992IRPFIELD INVESTIGATIONREPORT
    EM0-1096 VOL 1 ShemyaAFR,Alaska 1992IRPFIELD INVESTIGATIOREPN ORT Volume 1 of 4 TECHNICAL .., FINAL February1993 preparedfor U.S.Air Force IO ElmendorfAFB,Alaska 11th AirControlWing 1lth CivilEngineeringOperationsSquadron UnderContractDEU-91-06 Preparedby CH2MHILL RC.Box8748 Boise,Idaho83707 For EnvironmentalManagementOperations Undera RelatedServicesAgreement withtheU.S.Departmentof Energy EnvironmentalManagementOperations Richland,Washington99352 j OtSTR|BUTIOPJ 0_:: ii-tIU L_OCuiviENT iL, ',..;;'-,_;;;.,.';,:{:1;" ,. FINAL I i i NOTICE i This report has been prepared for the United States Air Force by CH2M HILL for the purpose of aiding in the implementation of a final remedial action plan under the Air Force Installation Restoration Program (IRP). As the report relates to actual or possible releases of potentially hazardous substances, its release prior to an Air Force final decision on remedial action may be in the public's interest. The limited objectives of this report and the ongoing nature of the IRP, along with the evolving knowledge of site conditions and chemical effects on the environment and health, must be considered when evaluating this report, since subsequent facts may become known which may make this report premature or inaccurate. Acceptance of this report in performance of the contract under which it is prepared does not mean that the Air Force adopts the conclusions, recommendations or other views expressed herein, which are those of the contractor only and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the United States Air Force. Government agencies and their contractors registered with the Defense TechnicalInformationCenter (DTIC) should direct requestsfop copies of.this report to: Defense Technical InformationCenter (DTIC), Cameron Station,Alexandria, VA 22304-6145.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stocked Lakes of Donnelly Training Area Getting There
    The Stocked Lakes of Donnelly Training Area Getting There... The Alaska Department of Fish and Game stocks About 8 miles south of Delta Junction, at MP 257.6 has no road access, but it can be reached by 16 lakes on Donnelly Training Area. Depending on Fishing Tips Richardson Highway, Meadows Road provides floatplane in the summer. During winter, you can the lake, you can fish for rainbow trout, Arctic char, access to most of the Donnelly Training Area reach Koole Lake on the winter trail. Cross the Arctic grayling, landlocked salmon, and lake trout. In some of the deeper lakes, there are naturally stocked lakes. Bullwinkle, Sheefish, Bolio, Luke, Tanana River and follow the trail, which starts at MP occurring populations of lake chub, sculpin, Arctic Mark, North Twin, South Twin, No Mercy, 306.2 Richardson Highway near Birch Lake. Koole Anglers fish from the bank on most of these lakes grayling, and longnose sucker. Of the hundreds of Rockhound, and Doc lakes all lie within a few miles Lake is stocked with rainbow trout. ADF&G has a because there is fairly deep water near shore. accessible lakes that exist on Donnelly Training Area, of Meadows Road. trail map to Koole Lake. Contact us at 459-7228 to Inflatable rafts, float tubes, and canoes can also be only these 16 are deep enough to stock game fishes. obtain a map. used, but the lakes are too small for motorized You can use a variety of tackle to catch these stocked boats, and there are no launch facilities. fish.
    [Show full text]
  • LORAN-A Historic Context
    ' . Prepared by Alice Coneybeer U.S. Coast Guard, MLCP (se) Coast Guard Island, Bldg. 540 Alameda, CA 94501-5100 Phone 510.437.5804 Fax 510.437.5753 U.S. Coast Guard- Maintenance & Logistics Command Pacific • • • • • • • • • • LORAN-A Historic Context Alaska (District 17) September 1998 ENCLOSURE(2.} ( LORAN-A Context 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS .........•.....................................................•......................•........•..................................•. 1 2. TECHNICAL BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 2 3. IDSTORY OF LORAN-A STATIONS.............................................................................................................. 2 4. LORAN-A IN ALASKA. ..................................................................................................................................... 3 5. LORAN-A DURING THE COLD WAR IN ALASKA (1945-1989) ............................................................... 4 6. NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGffiiLITY EVALUATION .............................................................................. 4 6.1 SIGNIFICANCE OF LORAN-A WITIIIN TilE CONTEXT OF TilE DEVELOPMENT OF AIDS TONAVIGATION ............................................................................................................................... 5 6.2 SIGNIFICANCE OF LORAN-A WITIIIN TilE CONTEXT OF WORLD WAR II IN ALASKA .............. 5 6.3 SIGNIFICANCE OF LORAN-A WITIIIN TilE HISTORIC CONTEXT
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Alaska Interagency Mobilization Guide Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Chapter 10 – Objectives, Policy, and Scope of Operations 1 Mission Statement 1 Alaska Interagency Mobilization Guide 1 Total Mobility 2 Priorities 2 Scope of Operation 2 National Response Framework (NRF) 2 Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA) 2 Northwest Wildland Fire Protection Agreement (Northwest Compact) 2 State Disaster Declarations / Division of Homeland Security (DHS) and Emergency Services (ES) 2 Mobilization / Demobilization 2 Work/Rest, Length of Assignment, Days Off and Extensions 3 Incident Operations Driving 3 Initial Response Definition 3 Invasive Plant/Seed Prevention 3 Wildland Fire Entrapment/Fatality 3 National Resources 3 Notification of Commitment of National Resources 3 Unable to Fill (UTF) Procedure 4 Standard Cubes, Weight, and Gear Policy for Personnel 4 Cost Coding 4 Fire Numbers 5 National Fire Preparedness Plan 6 National Multi-Agency Coordinating Group (NMAC) 9 Alaska Wildland Fire Coordinating Group (AWFCG) 9 Alaska Multi-Agency Coordinating Group (Alaska MAC or AMAC) 10 Incident Support Organization (ISO) 10 Mobilization Procedures for Military Assets 10 Established Resource Ordering Process 10 Civilian Support 10 Demobilization Procedures 10 International Operations 10 Ordering Channels 11 Geographic Area Coordination Centers (GACCs) 11 Alaska Coordination and Dispatch Centers 11 Agency Resource Providers in Alaska 12 Dispatch Center Call 12 Placing Requests with AICC 12 Ordering Procedures 12 Transferring Incidents between Centers in CAD and ROSS 13 Support to Border Fires 14 Non-Incident Related Ordering 14 Agreements 14 International Agreements 14 Interagency Agreements 15 Chapter 20 – Overhead and Teams 19 Mobilization and Demobilization 19 Travel 19 BLM Alaska Fire Service (AFS) Requests 19 State of Alaska Division of Forestry (DOF) Requests 20 2020 Alaska Interagency Mobilization Guide Table of Contents U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Determinations Decennial Review Analysis of Communities
    Rural Determinations Decennial Review Analysis of Communities and Areas As Assigned By The Federal Subsistence Board June 23, 2006 Offi ce of Subsistence Management 3601 C Street, Suite 1030 Anchorage, AK 99503 Contents Introduction .........................................................................................................................................1 Methods ................................................................................................................................................4 Overview of Community Characteristics .........................................................................................8 Adak ...................................................................................................................................................14 Prudhoe Bay ......................................................................................................................................17 Fairbanks North Star Borough ........................................................................................................20 Kenai Area .........................................................................................................................................23 Seward Area.......................................................................................................................................26 Wasilla Area .......................................................................................................................................28 Homer Area .......................................................................................................................................31
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Air Force Historical Literature, 1943 – 1983, 29 August 1983
    Description of document: Guide to Air Force Historical Literature, 1943 – 1983, 29 August 1983 Requested date: 09-April-2008 Released date: 23-July-2008 Posted date: 01-August-2008 Source of document: Department of the Air Force 11 CS/SCSR (MDR) 1000 Air Force Pentagon Washington, DC 20330-1000 Note: Previously released copies of this excellent reference have had some information withheld. This copy is complete. Classified documents described herein are best requested by asking for a Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) rather than by asking under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC 23 July 2008 HAF/IMII (MDR) 1000 Air Force Pentagon Washington, DC 20330-1000 Reference your letter dated, April 9, 2008 requesting a Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) for the "Guide to Air Force Historical Literature, 1943­ 1983, by Jacob Neufeld, Kenneth Schaffel and Anne E.
    [Show full text]
  • Cold War in Alaska a Resource Guide for Teachers and Students
    U.S. National Park Service Alaska Regional Office National Historic Landmarks Program COLD WAR IN ALASKA A RESOURCE GUIDE FOR TEACHERS AND STUDENTS RB-29 flying past Mt. McKinley, ca. 1948, U.S. Air Force Photo. DANGER Colors, this page left, mirror those used in the first radiation symbol designed by Cyrill Orly in 1945. The three-winged icon with center dot is "Roman violet,"a color used by early Nuclear scientists to denote a very precious item. The "sky blue" background was intended to create an arresting contrast. Original symbol (hand painted on wood) at the Lawrence Berkley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Radiation_symbol_-_James_V._For- restal_Building_-_IMG_2066.JPG ACTIVE U.S. Army soldiers on skis, Big Delta, Alaska, April 9, 1952, P175-163 Alaska State Library U.S. Army Signal Corps Photo Collection. U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Alaska Regional Office National Historic Landmarks Program First Printing 2014 Introduction Alaska’s frontline role during the Cold War ushered in unprecedented economic, technological, political, and social changes. The state’s strategic value in defending our nation also played a key role in its bid for statehood. Since the end of the Cold War, Alaska’s role and its effects on the state have received increasing focus from historians, veterans, and longtime Alaskans. This resource guide is designed to help students and teachers in researching the Cold War in Alaska, and to provide basic information for anyone who is interested in learning more about this unique history. The guide begins with a map of Cold War military sites in Alaska and a brief summary to help orient the reader.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Authorization for Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2006
    S. HRG. 109–22, PT. 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006 HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON S. 1042 TO AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006 FOR MILITARY ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FOR MILITARY CON- STRUCTION, AND FOR DEFENSE ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, TO PRESCRIBE PERSONNEL STRENGTHS FOR SUCH FISCAL YEAR FOR THE ARMED FORCES, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES PART 7 STRATEGIC FORCES MARCH 16, APRIL 4, 7, 2005 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services VerDate 0ct 09 2002 10:32 Jun 14, 2006 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 6011 C:\DOCS\21108.TXT SARMSER2 PsN: JUNEB DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006—Part 7 STRATEGIC FORCES VerDate 0ct 09 2002 10:32 Jun 14, 2006 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 C:\DOCS\21108.TXT SARMSER2 PsN: JUNEB S. HRG. 109–22, PT. 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006 HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON S. 1042 TO AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006 FOR MILITARY ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FOR MILITARY CON- STRUCTION, AND FOR DEFENSE ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, TO PRESCRIBE PERSONNEL STRENGTHS FOR SUCH FISCAL YEAR FOR THE ARMED FORCES, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES PART 7 STRATEGIC FORCES MARCH 16, APRIL 4, 7, 2005 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Phased-Array Radar Technology the Development of Phased-Array Radar Technology
    • FENN, TEMME, DELANEY, AND COURTNEY The Development of Phased-Array Radar Technology The Development of Phased-Array Radar Technology Alan J. Fenn, Donald H. Temme, William P. Delaney, and William E. Courtney I Lincoln Laboratory has been involved in the development of phased-array radar technology since the late 1950s. Radar research activities have included theoretical analysis, application studies, hardware design, device fabrication, and system testing. Early phased-array research was centered on improving the national capability in phased-array radars. The Laboratory has developed several test-bed phased arrays, which have been used to demonstrate and evaluate components, beamforming techniques, calibration, and testing methodologies. The Laboratory has also contributed significantly in the area of phased-array antenna radiating elements, phase-shifter technology, solid-state transmit-and- receive modules, and monolithic microwave integrated circuit (MMIC) technology. A number of developmental phased-array radar systems have resulted from this research, as discussed in other articles in this issue. A wide variety of processing techniques and system components have also been developed. This article provides an overview of more than forty years of this phased-array radar research activity. was certainly affordable array radar with thousands of array ele- not new when Lincoln Laboratory’s phased- ments, all working in tightly orchestrated phase co- Tarray radar development began around 1958. herence, would not be built for a very long time. In Early radio transmitters and the early World War II retrospect, both the enthusiasts and the skeptics were radars used multiple radiating elements to achieve de- right. The dream of electronic beam movement was sired antenna radiation patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Missile Defense for the 21St Century by Gregory H. Canavan
    BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TECHNICAL STUDIES SERIES MISSILE DEFENSE FOR THE 21ST CENTURY Gregory H. Canavan i Published by The Heritage Foundation 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE Washington, DC 20002–4999 800-544-4843 heritage.org Copyright © 2003 The Heritage Foundation ISBN 0-89195-261-6 Cover design by Mark Hurlburt Layout by Michelle Fulton Smith Charts and Graphs by Russell Martin Nothing written here is to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of The Heritage Foundation or as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill before Congress. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE / VII LIST OF FIGURES / VIII LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS / IX INTRODUCTION / XV TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENTS IN MISSILE DEFENSE / 1 Early Missile Defense and Offensive Proliferation: Offensive Proliferation / 3 Early Technologies and Systems: NIKE Systems; Sentinel; Safeguard / 5 Uncertainties / 16 Summary of Developments in Nuclear Phases / 19 DEVELOPMENTS DURING THE 1970S / 23 The ABM Treaty / 23 U.S. Army Programs and Hit-to-Kill Technology / 24 Space-Based Laser for Boost-Phase Intercept / 27 Summary of Developments During the Interim Program / 28 DEVELOPMENTS DURING THE 1980S / 29 Strategic Defense Initiative: Exploration Phase / 29 Strategic Defense System Phase I / 32 Brilliant Pebbles / 37 Brilliant Pebbles in Midcourse and Terminal / 42 Summary of Developments During SDI / 45 GLOBAL PROTECTION AGAINST LIMITED STRIKES / 47 Scope / 47 Elements / 48 Development and Testing / 50 Navy Contributions / 53 iii Ballistic Missile Defense Technical Studies
    [Show full text]