DOCSLIB.ORG

Ballistic Missile Defense Glossary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE GLOSSARY VERSION 3.0 JUNE 1997 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION 7100 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-7100 PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS PURPOSE The purpose of this glossary is to facilitate a common language within the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO) and the ballistic missile defense community. This glossary supplements other existing Department of Defense (DoD) publications. SCOPE This glossary is not an official DoD publication; it is limited to terminology that relates to ballistic missile defense. A number of computer, software, and engineering terms are included, especially those applicable to BMD. In addition, numerous acquisition terms are included in light of BMDO’s ongoing transition to a more acquisition-oriented agency. Many entries are taken from the DoD 5000-series of directives, the DoD program objective memorandums, the Joint Staff Glossary (Joint Pub 1-02), and the Defense Systems Management College Glossary. A number of outdated or seldom-used terms are also included for historical relevance, though obsolete terms are denoted. WORLD WIDE WEB The BMDO Glossary can be found on the BMDO World Wide Web home page at http://www.acq.osd.mil/bmdo/bmdolink/html/ FORMAT All entries are listed in alphabetical order, including acronyms (which are cross-referenced with their corresponding definition). General terms are defined in a BMD context where appropriate. In cases where a term has more than one BMD-related meaning, multiple definitions are given. Wherever possible, organizational changes occurring since publication of the October 1995 BMDO Glossary are incorporated. Please note that abbreviations and acronyms listed herein are capitalized for ease of reference. This does not imply that they are capitalized in general usage. BMDO/SRE wishes to thank those whose efforts and support contributed to the timeliness and relevance of this revision. BMDO Glossary, ver. 3.0 supersedes the BMDO Glossary dated October 1995. Select the alphabetical area of interest: <A> <B> <C> <D> <E> <F> <G> <H> <I> <J> <K> <L> <M> <N> <O> <P> <Q> <R> <S> <T> <U> <V> <W> <X> <Y> <Z> ii The Ballistic Missile Defense Glossary Changes or Corrections Click here for Interactive Form Submission The Ballistic Missile Defense Glossary is most useful when it is current; however, the nature of our program makes this difficult. When proposing changes to the glossary, please keep in mind the purpose of the glossary is to facilitate a common language within the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO) and the ballistic missile defense community and content is limited to terminology that relates to ballistic missile defense. Please provide the following information: Name: ____________________________________________________ Address: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ Phone Number: _________________ Fax Number: _________________ E-Mail Address: _____________________________________________ Word and Acronym: __________________________________________ Service: _________________ Program: __________________ Meaning: Added/Deleted/Obsolete* (Circle One) __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ *If the word/acronym is obsolete, please provide the new term that replaced it. NOTE: All proposed changes/corrections must be coordinated through BMDO Approving Authority: ________________________ Office Symbol: ____________________________________ Changes or corrections may be submitted at any time to: Ballistic Missile Defense Organization Deputy for Strategic Relations (BMDO/SRE) 7100 Defense Pentagon Washington, DC 20301-7100 or E-Mail this form to: [email protected] iii Notes v BMDO GLOSSARY, VER. 3.0 A A Spec System Specification. A&T Acquisition and Technology. A&T Acquisition and Technology. A/BPI Ascent/Boost-Phase Interceptor. A/C Aircraft. A/D 1. Analog to Digital. 2. Arm/Disarm. A/P Active/Passive. AA See Attack Assessment. AAA 1. Antiaircraft Artillery. 2. Assign Alternate Area. 3. AEGIS Acquisition Agent. AAAW Air-launched Anti-Armour Weapon (UK RAF term) AABCP Advanced Airborne Command Post. AABNCP Advanced Airborne National Command Post AACC Airborne Alternate Command Center. AACT Airborne Atmospheric Compensation and Tracking [Program] AADC Area Air Defense Commander. AADCOM Army Air Defense Commander. AAE Army Acquisition Executive. AAED Advanced Airborne Expendable Decoy. AAFCE Allied Air Forces Central Europe. AAM Air-to-Air Missile AAR After Action Review (USA term) AASERT Augmentation Award for Science and Engineering Research Training. AASP Advanced Airborne Sensor Platform. AAT Architecture Analysis Tool. AAT-PP Architecture Analysis Tool - Post Processor. AAW Anti-Air Warfare. AAWC Anti-Air Warfare Commander. AB Air Base Abacus Distributed real-time multi-element test environment for HWIL. 1 BMDO GLOSSARY, VER. 3.0 A ABCCC 1. Airborne Battlefield Command and Control Center. (US C-130 aircraft) 2. Airborne Communications Command and Control Platform (JFACC term) ABCS 1. Army Battle Command System (USA term). 2. Advanced Beam Control System. ABCT ASARC/BMDARC Coordination Team. ABE Army Background Experiment (flew aboard the LACE spacecraft). ABIS Advanced Battlespace Information System. ABL 1. Airborne Laser. 2. Aircraft Based Laser. 3. Armored Box Launcher. Ablative Shield A shield made of material that vaporizes when heated, absorbing thermal energy and protecting the shielded object from heat damage. Ablative Shock A mechanical shock wave at the surface of an object exposed to intense pulsed electro- magnetic radiation. A thin layer of the object's surface violently and rapidly boils off; the resulting vapor suddenly exerts pressure against the surface, generating a pressure wave at the surface. This shock wave then propagates through the material and can cause melting, vaporization, spallation, and structural failure of the object. ABM See Anti-Ballistic Missile. ABM Treaty Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty of 1972, signed and ratified by the (former) Soviet Union and the United States, limiting deployment on each side to one site comprising 100 interceptors, 100 launchers, and several ground-based radars. The Treaty also regulates development and testing. ABM-X-3 A terminal Soviet anti-ballistic missile (ABM) defense system using transportable phased-array radars and both long and short-range, high acceleration interceptors similar to the U.S. Sprint. This system was developed and tested in the 1970’s and early 1980’s. ABMDA OBSOLETE. Advanced Ballistic Missile Defense Agency. ABNCP Airborne National Command Post. ABO Agent of Biological Origin (NBC term). ABT Air-Breathing Threat. ACA 1. Airspace Control Authority. 2. Associate Contracting Agreement (Contracting term). ACAP Advanced Capabilities. ACAT Acquisition Category (DD 5000 term). ACAT I Acquisition Category One. ACBA Airborne Communications Bus Architecture (USAF term). ACC 1. Air Combat Command (USAF), Langley AFB, VA. 2. Access Control Center. 3. Air Component Commander. 4. Area Coordination Center. 2 BMDO GLOSSARY, VER. 3.0 A Accidental An unintended launch which occurs without deliberate national design as a direct result Launch of a random event, such as mechanical failure, a simple human error, or an unauthorized action by a subordinate. (USSPACECOM) ACCS 1. Air Command and Control System. 2. Automated Command and Control System (USN AN/TSQ-73) 3. Airspace Command/Control System. ACCT Application of Common Characteristics and Testability (USA CECOM term). ACDA Arms Control and Disarmament Agency (US). ACDS Advanced Combat Direction System (USN term). ACDT See Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration. ACE 1. Anti-Radiation Missile (ARM) Countermeasure Evaluator. 2. Aviation Combat Element. 3. Airborne Command Element (USAF, JFACC). 4. Allied Command Europe. 5. Arrow Continuing Experiment. 6. Analysis Control Element (Intelligence term). 7. Asset Configuration Editor. ACEC Ada Compiler Evaluation Capability. ACEIT Automated Cost Estimating Integrated tool. ACES Arrow Continuation Experiments. ACETEF Air Combat Environment Test and Evaluation Facility (USAF). ACIM Availability Centered Inventory Model. ACIS 1. Arms Control Impact Statement. 2. Automated Control of Industrial Systems ACL Advanced Computer Laboratory. ACM 1. Air Combat Maneuvering. 2. Attitude Control Motor. ACMREQ Airspace Control Means Request (JFACC term). ACO 1. See Administrative Contracting Officer. 2. Airspace Control Order (JFACC term). ACOM Atlantic Command. ACoS Army Chief of Staff. ACP 1. Airspace Control Plan (JFACC term). 2. Army Cost Position. ACQ See Acquisition. Acquire 1. When applied to acquisition radars, to detect the presence and location of a target in sufficient detail to permit identification. 2. When applied to tracking radars, to position a radar beam so that a target is in that beam to permit the effective employment of weapons. (See Target Acquisition.) 3 BMDO GLOSSARY, VER. 3.0 A Acquisition 1. (Sensor) The results of processing sensor measurements to produce object reports of (ACQ) interest to the system. 2. (Material) The conceptualization, initiation, design, development, testing, contracting, production, deployment, logistic support, modification, and disposal of weapons and other systems, supplies or services to satisfy DoD needs in support of military missions. Acquisition Categories
Recommended publications
  • Hearing National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 Oversight of Previously Authorized Programs Committee on Armed S

    Hearing National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 Oversight of Previously Authorized Programs Committee on Armed S

    i [H.A.S.C. No. 112–111] HEARING ON NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013 AND OVERSIGHT OF PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED PROGRAMS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES HEARING ON FISCAL YEAR 2013 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION BUDGET REQUEST FOR MISSILE DEFENSE HEARING HELD MARCH 6, 2012 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 73–437 WASHINGTON : 2012 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, http://bookstore.gpo.gov. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center, U.S. Government Printing Office. Phone 202–512–1800, or 866–512–1800 (toll-free). E-mail, [email protected]. SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES MICHAEL TURNER, Ohio, Chairman TRENT FRANKS, Arizona LORETTA SANCHEZ, California DOUG LAMBORN, Colorado JAMES R. LANGEVIN, Rhode Island MO BROOKS, Alabama RICK LARSEN, Washington MAC THORNBERRY, Texas MARTIN HEINRICH, New Mexico MIKE ROGERS, Alabama JOHN R. GARAMENDI, California JOHN C. FLEMING, M.D., Louisiana C.A. DUTCH RUPPERSBERGER, Maryland SCOTT RIGELL, Virginia BETTY SUTTON, Ohio AUSTIN SCOTT, Georgia TIM MORRISON, Professional Staff Member LEONOR TOMERO, Professional Staff Member AARON FALK, Staff Assistant (II) C O N T E N T S CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF HEARINGS 2012 Page HEARING: Tuesday, March 6, 2012, Fiscal Year 2013 National Defense Authorization Budget Request for Missile Defense ................................................................... 1 APPENDIX: Tuesday, March 6, 2012 .......................................................................................... 33 TUESDAY, MARCH 6, 2012 FISCAL YEAR 2013 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION BUDGET REQUEST FOR MISSILE DEFENSE STATEMENTS PRESENTED BY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Sanchez, Hon. Loretta, a Representative from California, Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Strategic Forces .....................................................................
  • The Celestial Mechanics of Newton

    The Celestial Mechanics of Newton

    GENERAL I ARTICLE The Celestial Mechanics of Newton Dipankar Bhattacharya Newton's law of universal gravitation laid the physical foundation of celestial mechanics. This article reviews the steps towards the law of gravi­ tation, and highlights some applications to celes­ tial mechanics found in Newton's Principia. 1. Introduction Newton's Principia consists of three books; the third Dipankar Bhattacharya is at the Astrophysics Group dealing with the The System of the World puts forth of the Raman Research Newton's views on celestial mechanics. This third book Institute. His research is indeed the heart of Newton's "natural philosophy" interests cover all types of which draws heavily on the mathematical results derived cosmic explosions and in the first two books. Here he systematises his math­ their remnants. ematical findings and confronts them against a variety of observed phenomena culminating in a powerful and compelling development of the universal law of gravita­ tion. Newton lived in an era of exciting developments in Nat­ ural Philosophy. Some three decades before his birth J 0- hannes Kepler had announced his first two laws of plan­ etary motion (AD 1609), to be followed by the third law after a decade (AD 1619). These were empirical laws derived from accurate astronomical observations, and stirred the imagination of philosophers regarding their underlying cause. Mechanics of terrestrial bodies was also being developed around this time. Galileo's experiments were conducted in the early 17th century leading to the discovery of the Keywords laws of free fall and projectile motion. Galileo's Dialogue Celestial mechanics, astronomy, about the system of the world was published in 1632.
  • Curriculum Overview Physics/Pre-AP 2018-2019 1St Nine Weeks

    Curriculum Overview Physics/Pre-AP 2018-2019 1St Nine Weeks

    Curriculum Overview Physics/Pre-AP 2018-2019 1st Nine Weeks RESOURCES: Essential Physics (Ergopedia – online book) Physics Classroom http://www.physicsclassroom.com/ PHET Simulations https://phet.colorado.edu/ ONGOING TEKS: 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2F, 2G, 2H, 2I, 2J,3E 1) SAFETY TEKS 1A, 1B Vocabulary Fume hood, fire blanket, fire extinguisher, goggle sanitizer, eye wash, safety shower, impact goggles, chemical safety goggles, fire exit, electrical safety cut off, apron, broken glass container, disposal alert, biological hazard, open flame alert, thermal safety, sharp object safety, fume safety, electrical safety, plant safety, animal safety, radioactive safety, clothing protection safety, fire safety, explosion safety, eye safety, poison safety, chemical safety Key Concepts The student will be able to determine if a situation in the physics lab is a safe practice and what appropriate safety equipment and safety warning signs may be needed in a physics lab. The student will be able to determine the proper disposal or recycling of materials in the physics lab. Essential Questions 1. How are safe practices in school, home or job applied? 2. What are the consequences for not using safety equipment or following safe practices? 2) SCIENCE OF PHYSICS: Glossary, Pages 35, 39 TEKS 2B, 2C Vocabulary Matter, energy, hypothesis, theory, objectivity, reproducibility, experiment, qualitative, quantitative, engineering, technology, science, pseudo-science, non-science Key Concepts The student will know that scientific hypotheses are tentative and testable statements that must be capable of being supported or not supported by observational evidence. The student will know that scientific theories are based on natural and physical phenomena and are capable of being tested by multiple independent researchers.
  • Shemyaafr,Alaska 1992IRPFIELD INVESTIGATIONREPORT

    Shemyaafr,Alaska 1992IRPFIELD INVESTIGATIONREPORT

    EM0-1096 VOL 1 ShemyaAFR,Alaska 1992IRPFIELD INVESTIGATIOREPN ORT Volume 1 of 4 TECHNICAL .., FINAL February1993 preparedfor U.S.Air Force IO ElmendorfAFB,Alaska 11th AirControlWing 1lth CivilEngineeringOperationsSquadron UnderContractDEU-91-06 Preparedby CH2MHILL RC.Box8748 Boise,Idaho83707 For EnvironmentalManagementOperations Undera RelatedServicesAgreement withtheU.S.Departmentof Energy EnvironmentalManagementOperations Richland,Washington99352 j OtSTR|BUTIOPJ 0_:: ii-tIU L_OCuiviENT iL, ',..;;'-,_;;;.,.';,:{:1;" ,. FINAL I i i NOTICE i This report has been prepared for the United States Air Force by CH2M HILL for the purpose of aiding in the implementation of a final remedial action plan under the Air Force Installation Restoration Program (IRP). As the report relates to actual or possible releases of potentially hazardous substances, its release prior to an Air Force final decision on remedial action may be in the public's interest. The limited objectives of this report and the ongoing nature of the IRP, along with the evolving knowledge of site conditions and chemical effects on the environment and health, must be considered when evaluating this report, since subsequent facts may become known which may make this report premature or inaccurate. Acceptance of this report in performance of the contract under which it is prepared does not mean that the Air Force adopts the conclusions, recommendations or other views expressed herein, which are those of the contractor only and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the United States Air Force. Government agencies and their contractors registered with the Defense TechnicalInformationCenter (DTIC) should direct requestsfop copies of.this report to: Defense Technical InformationCenter (DTIC), Cameron Station,Alexandria, VA 22304-6145.
  • Law Enforcement Intelligence: a Guide for State, Local, and Tribal Law Enforcement Agencies Second Edition

    Law Enforcement Intelligence: a Guide for State, Local, and Tribal Law Enforcement Agencies Second Edition

    U. S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services Law Enforcement Intelligence: A Guide for State, Local, and Tribal Law Enforcement Agencies Second Edition David L. Carter, Ph.D. School of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University Law Enforcement Intelligence: A Guide for State, Local, and Tribal Law Enforcement Agencies Second Edition David L. Carter, Ph.D. School of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University This project was supported by Cooperative Agreement #2007-CK-WX-K015 by the U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. Points of view or opinions contained in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice or Michigan State University. References to specific agencies, companies, products, or services should not be considered an endorsement by the author or the U.S. Department of Justice. Rather, the references are illustrations to supplement discussion of the issues. Letter from the COPS Office January 2009 Dear Colleague: This second edition of Law Enforcement Intelligence: A Guide for State, Local, and Tribal Law Enforcement captures the vast changes that have occurred in the 4 years since the first edition of the guide was published in 2004 after the watershed events of September 11, 2001. At that time, there was no Department of Homeland Security, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Information-Sharing Environment, or Fusion Centers. Since the advent of these new agencies to help fight the war on terror, emphasis has been placed on cooperation and on sharing information among local, state, tribal, and federal agencies.
  • Classical Particle Trajectories‡

    Classical Particle Trajectories‡

    1 Variational approach to a theory of CLASSICAL PARTICLE TRAJECTORIES ‡ Introduction. The problem central to the classical mechanics of a particle is usually construed to be to discover the function x(t) that describes—relative to an inertial Cartesian reference frame—the positions assumed by the particle at successive times t. This is the problem addressed by Newton, according to whom our analytical task is to discover the solution of the differential equation d2x(t) m = F (x(t)) dt2 that conforms to prescribed initial data x(0) = x0, x˙ (0) = v0. Here I explore an alternative approach to the same physical problem, which we cleave into two parts: we look first for the trajectory traced by the particle, and then—as a separate exercise—for its rate of progress along that trajectory. The discussion will cast new light on (among other things) an important but frequently misinterpreted variational principle, and upon a curious relationship between the “motion of particles” and the “motion of photons”—the one being, when you think about it, hardly more abstract than the other. ‡ The following material is based upon notes from a Reed College Physics Seminar “Geometrical Mechanics: Remarks commemorative of Heinrich Hertz” that was presented February . 2 Classical trajectories 1. “Transit time” in 1-dimensional mechanics. To describe (relative to an inertial frame) the 1-dimensional motion of a mass point m we were taught by Newton to write mx¨ = F (x) − d If F (x) is “conservative” F (x)= dx U(x) (which in the 1-dimensional case is automatic) then, by a familiar line of argument, ≡ 1 2 ˙ E 2 mx˙ + U(x) is conserved: E =0 Therefore the speed of the particle when at x can be described 2 − v(x)= m E U(x) (1) and is determined (see the Figure 1) by the “local depth E − U(x) of the potential lake.” Several useful conclusions are immediate.
  • The First Americans the 1941 US Codebreaking Mission to Bletchley Park

    The First Americans the 1941 US Codebreaking Mission to Bletchley Park

    United States Cryptologic History The First Americans The 1941 US Codebreaking Mission to Bletchley Park Special series | Volume 12 | 2016 Center for Cryptologic History David J. Sherman is Associate Director for Policy and Records at the National Security Agency. A graduate of Duke University, he holds a doctorate in Slavic Studies from Cornell University, where he taught for three years. He also is a graduate of the CAPSTONE General/Flag Officer Course at the National Defense University, the Intelligence Community Senior Leadership Program, and the Alexander S. Pushkin Institute of the Russian Language in Moscow. He has served as Associate Dean for Academic Programs at the National War College and while there taught courses on strategy, inter- national relations, and intelligence. Among his other government assignments include ones as NSA’s representative to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, as Director for Intelligence Programs at the National Security Council, and on the staff of the National Economic Council. This publication presents a historical perspective for informational and educational purposes, is the result of independent research, and does not necessarily reflect a position of NSA/CSS or any other US government entity. This publication is distributed free by the National Security Agency. If you would like additional copies, please email [email protected] or write to: Center for Cryptologic History National Security Agency 9800 Savage Road, Suite 6886 Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755 Cover: (Top) Navy Department building, with Washington Monument in center distance, 1918 or 1919; (bottom) Bletchley Park mansion, headquarters of UK codebreaking, 1939 UNITED STATES CRYPTOLOGIC HISTORY The First Americans The 1941 US Codebreaking Mission to Bletchley Park David Sherman National Security Agency Center for Cryptologic History 2016 Second Printing Contents Foreword ................................................................................
  • LORAN-A Historic Context

    LORAN-A Historic Context

    ' . Prepared by Alice Coneybeer U.S. Coast Guard, MLCP (se) Coast Guard Island, Bldg. 540 Alameda, CA 94501-5100 Phone 510.437.5804 Fax 510.437.5753 U.S. Coast Guard- Maintenance & Logistics Command Pacific • • • • • • • • • • LORAN-A Historic Context Alaska (District 17) September 1998 ENCLOSURE(2.} ( LORAN-A Context 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS .........•.....................................................•......................•........•..................................•. 1 2. TECHNICAL BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 2 3. IDSTORY OF LORAN-A STATIONS.............................................................................................................. 2 4. LORAN-A IN ALASKA. ..................................................................................................................................... 3 5. LORAN-A DURING THE COLD WAR IN ALASKA (1945-1989) ............................................................... 4 6. NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGffiiLITY EVALUATION .............................................................................. 4 6.1 SIGNIFICANCE OF LORAN-A WITIIIN TilE CONTEXT OF TilE DEVELOPMENT OF AIDS TONAVIGATION ............................................................................................................................... 5 6.2 SIGNIFICANCE OF LORAN-A WITIIIN TilE CONTEXT OF WORLD WAR II IN ALASKA .............. 5 6.3 SIGNIFICANCE OF LORAN-A WITIIIN TilE HISTORIC CONTEXT
  • Downloaded April 22, 2006

    Downloaded April 22, 2006

    SIX DECADES OF GUIDED MUNITIONS AND BATTLE NETWORKS: PROGRESS AND PROSPECTS Barry D. Watts Thinking Center for Strategic Smarter and Budgetary Assessments About Defense www.csbaonline.org Six Decades of Guided Munitions and Battle Networks: Progress and Prospects by Barry D. Watts Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments March 2007 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA) is an independent, nonprofit, public policy research institute established to make clear the inextricable link between near-term and long- range military planning and defense investment strategies. CSBA is directed by Dr. Andrew F. Krepinevich and funded by foundations, corporations, government, and individual grants and contributions. This report is one in a series of CSBA analyses on the emerging military revolution. Previous reports in this series include The Military-Technical Revolution: A Preliminary Assessment (2002), Meeting the Anti-Access and Area-Denial Challenge (2003), and The Revolution in War (2004). The first of these, on the military-technical revolution, reproduces the 1992 Pentagon assessment that precipitated the 1990s debate in the United States and abroad over revolutions in military affairs. Many friends and professional colleagues, both within CSBA and outside the Center, have contributed to this report. Those who made the most substantial improvements to the final manuscript are acknowledged below. However, the analysis and findings are solely the responsibility of the author and CSBA. 1667 K Street, NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 331-7990 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEGEMENTS .................................................. v SUMMARY ............................................................... ix GLOSSARY ………………………………………………………xix I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................... 1 Guided Munitions: Origins in the 1940s............. 3 Cold War Developments and Prospects ............
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 239/Friday, December 11, 2020/Notices

    Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 239/Friday, December 11, 2020/Notices

    80062 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 239 / Friday, December 11, 2020 / Notices maintenance support; U.S. absorbing this equipment and support provides a high capacity, low latency Government and contractor into its armed forces. internet Protocol (IP) based waveform engineering, technical, and logistics The proposed sale of this equipment that can quickly transmit large amounts support services; and other related and support will not alter the basic of data. Advanced algorithms allow elements of logistical and program military balance in the region. cooperative detection and engagement support. The principal U.S. contractor will be of a wider array of targets, improving (iv) Military Department: Navy (RO– Raytheon Missile and Defense, Tucson, fused track accuracy and increasing P–SAE) AZ. There are no known offset lethality/survivability through (v) Prior Related Cases, if any: None agreements proposed in connection Situational Awareness. (vi) Sales Commission, Fee, etc., Paid, with this potential sale. Implementation of the proposed sale 3. The highest level of classification of Offered, or Agreed to be Paid: None defense articles, components, and (vii) Sensitivity of Technology will require U.S. Government and contractor personnel to visit Romania services included in this potential sale Contained in the Defense Article or is SECRET. Defense Services Proposed to be Sold: on a temporary basis in conjunction See Attached Annex with program technical oversight and 4. If a technologically advanced (viii) Date Report Delivered to support requirements, including adversary were to obtain knowledge of Congress: October 16, 2020 program and technical reviews, as well the specific hardware and software * As defined in Section 47(6) of the as to provide training and maintenance elements, the information could be used Arms Export Control Act.
  • Azure Integration Services Announcements from Ignite 2020

    Azure Integration Services Announcements from Ignite 2020

    Melb.NET Azure Integration Services Announcements from Ignite 2020 Bill Chesnut Cloud Platform & API Evangelist, SixPivot Azure MVP [email protected] @biztalkbill Agenda General Azure Logic Apps API Management Azure Functions BizTalk Server General • Azure Availability Zones now in Australia East • App Service introduces the new Pv3 SKU for Windows and Linux customers • App Service announces the general availability of Windows Container support • App Service Environment v3 in development--will launch November 1 • Azure Communication Services now available in public preview (US for now) Azure Logic Apps Logic Apps will now run on a new containerized runtime, the same runtime powering Azure Functions, providing hosting flexibility to: • Run on Functions, App Service, Kubernetes, Docker and any cloud. • Deploy multiple workflows to a single Logic App simplifying automated deployments and CI/CD pipelines. • Enable enterprise features such as private endpoints, simpler and more cost effective VNET access, deployment slots and more. • New VS Code Extension • Local Development • Improved Functions integration https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/azure-developer-community-blog/new-logic-apps-runtime-performance-and-developer- improvements/ba-p/1645335 Azure Logic Apps (2) • Better CI/CD with VS Code. • New Designer (more on the screen, easier to understand) • Performance with Stateless • Automation Tasks (Logic Apps without building them) https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/azure-developer-community-blog/new-logic-apps-runtime-performance-and-developer- improvements/ba-p/1645335 Azure API Management Debug API Management Policies in real time • Developer Tier Only • VS Code • Set breakpoints https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=ms-azuretools.vscode-apimanagement Support for Dapr applications in API Management • Using three new policies you can perform service invocations, dispatch messages to pub/sub topics, and send messages to external systems from a Dapr- enlightened self-hosted gateway.
  • Acronyms Abbreviations &Terms

    Acronyms Abbreviations &Terms

    Acronyms Abbreviations &Terms A Capability Assurance Job Aid FEMA P-524 / July 2009 FEMA Acronyms Abbreviations and Terms Produced by the National Preparedness Directorate, National Integration Center, Incident Management Systems Integration Division Please direct requests for additional copies to: FEMA Publications (800) 480-2520 Or download the document from the Web: www.fema.gov/plan/prepare/faat.shtm U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency The FEMA Acronyms, Abbreviations & Terms (FAAT) List is not designed to be an authoritative source, merely a handy reference and a living document subject to periodic updating. Inclusion recognizes terminology existence, not legitimacy. Entries known to be obsolete (see new “Obsolete or Replaced” section near end of this document) are included because they may still appear in extant publications and correspondence. Your comments and recommendations are welcome. Please electronically forward your input or direct your questions to: [email protected] Please direct requests for additional copies to: FEMA Publications (800) 480-2520 Or download the document from the Web: www.fema.gov/plan/prepare/faat.shtm 2SR Second Stage Review ABEL Agent Based Economic Laboratory 4Wd Four Wheel Drive ABF Automatic Broadcast Feed A 1) Activity of Isotope ABHS Alcohol Based Hand Sanitizer 2) Ampere ABI Automated Broker Interface 3) Atomic Mass ABIH American Board of Industrial Hygiene A&E Architectural and Engineering ABIS see IDENT A&FM Aviation and Fire Management ABM Anti-Ballistic Missile