Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 239/Friday, December 11, 2020/Notices

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 239/Friday, December 11, 2020/Notices 80062 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 239 / Friday, December 11, 2020 / Notices maintenance support; U.S. absorbing this equipment and support provides a high capacity, low latency Government and contractor into its armed forces. internet Protocol (IP) based waveform engineering, technical, and logistics The proposed sale of this equipment that can quickly transmit large amounts support services; and other related and support will not alter the basic of data. Advanced algorithms allow elements of logistical and program military balance in the region. cooperative detection and engagement support. The principal U.S. contractor will be of a wider array of targets, improving (iv) Military Department: Navy (RO– Raytheon Missile and Defense, Tucson, fused track accuracy and increasing P–SAE) AZ. There are no known offset lethality/survivability through (v) Prior Related Cases, if any: None agreements proposed in connection Situational Awareness. (vi) Sales Commission, Fee, etc., Paid, with this potential sale. Implementation of the proposed sale 3. The highest level of classification of Offered, or Agreed to be Paid: None defense articles, components, and (vii) Sensitivity of Technology will require U.S. Government and contractor personnel to visit Romania services included in this potential sale Contained in the Defense Article or is SECRET. Defense Services Proposed to be Sold: on a temporary basis in conjunction See Attached Annex with program technical oversight and 4. If a technologically advanced (viii) Date Report Delivered to support requirements, including adversary were to obtain knowledge of Congress: October 16, 2020 program and technical reviews, as well the specific hardware and software * As defined in Section 47(6) of the as to provide training and maintenance elements, the information could be used Arms Export Control Act. support in country. to develop countermeasures that might There will be no adverse impact on reduce weapon system effectiveness or POLICY JUSTIFICATION U.S. defense readiness as a result of this be used in the development of a system Romania—Naval Strike Missile (NSM) proposed sale. with similar or advanced capabilities. Coastal Defense System (CDS) Transmittal No. 20–72 5. A determination has been made The Government of Romania has Notice of Proposed Issuance of Letter of that Romania can provide substantially requested to buy two (2) Coastal Defense Offer Pursuant to Section 36(b)(1) of the the same degree of protection for the Systems (CDS) consisting of: Up to ten Arms Export Control Act sensitive technology being released as the U.S. Government. This sale is (10) Link-16 Multifunctional Annex Information Distribution System—Joint necessary in furtherance of the U.S. Tactical Radio Systems (MIDS–JTRS). Item No. vii foreign policy and national security objectives outlined in the Policy Also included are two Coastal Defense 1. The Naval Strike Missile (NSM) System Fire Distribution Centers; four Coastal Defense System (CDS) provides Justification. Mobile Launch Vehicles; Transport a high performance, mobile, ground- 6. All defense articles and services Loading Vehicles; Naval Strike Missiles; based coastal defense capability. It has listed in this transmittal have been non-operational Inert Handling/Loading a net centric architecture, which enables authorized for release and export to the Missile (IHM) to support missile multiple simultaneous engagements and Government of the Romania. handling and loading/unloading; over-the-horizon (OTH) targeting. The [FR Doc. 2020–27299 Filed 12–10–20; 8:45 am] training missile and equipment spares; system can be closely integrated and BILLING CODE 5001–06–P associated containers; training and adapted to a country’s adjacent weapons training equipment; publications and and command and control systems. This technical documentation; spares parts; expands the defended area and DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE loading and mobile maintenance enhances the total fighting capability of support; U.S. Government and the force. The NSM CDS is a ‘‘turn-key’’ Office of the Secretary contractor engineering, technical, and solution that includes equipment, prime logistics support services; and other movers, spares, training, training [Transmittal No. 20–66] related elements of logistical and equipment, logistics support equipment, program support. The estimated total documentation, services, and Arms Sales Notification cost is $300 million. communications. This configuration This proposed sale will support the consists of mobile Command and AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation foreign policy and national security of Control (C2) Fire Distribution Centers Agency, Department of Defense. the United States by helping to improve (FDCs) with an integrated the security of a NATO Ally in communication subsystem and ACTION: Arms sales notice. developing and maintaining a strong associated software; Mobile Launch and ready self-defense capability. This Vehicles (MLVs) that perform a SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is proposed sale will enhance U.S. complete fire mission; Transport publishing the unclassified text of an national security objectives in the Loading Vehicles (TLVs) for the arms sales notification. region. missiles; communication subsystem; FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The proposed sale will improve Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS); Karma Job at [email protected] Romania’s capability to meet current tactical missiles; telemetered missiles to or (703) 697–8976. and future threats by improving support test firings; inert or ‘‘dummy’’ Romania’s maritime defense capabilities missiles for handling/loading training; SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This in the Black Sea and increasing and an inert operational missile to 36(b)(1) arms sales notification is interoperability with the United States. support ground based integration and published to fulfill the requirements of Romania will use this long-range, system verification testing. section 155 of Public Law 104–164 precision strike weapon to enhance 2. Multifunctional Information dated July 21, 1996. The following is a mission effectiveness, survivability, and Distribution System—Joint Tactical copy of a letter to the Speaker of the NATO interoperability in current and Radio System (MIDS–JTRS) is a secure House of Representatives, Transmittal future missions and operations. data and voice communication network 20–66 with attached Policy Justification Romania will have no difficulty using Link-16 architecture. MIDS–JTRS and Sensitivity of Technology. VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:25 Dec 10, 2020 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM 11DEN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 239 / Friday, December 11, 2020 / Notices 80063 Dated: December 8, 2020. Kayyonne T. Marston, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. BILLING CODE 5001–06–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:25 Dec 10, 2020 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM 11DEN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES EN11DE20.011</GPH> 80064 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 239 / Friday, December 11, 2020 / Notices BILLING CODE 500–06–C Thirty-two (32) BLU-109, General *As defined in Section 47(6) of the Transmittal No. 20-66 Purpose Bomb Arms Export Control Act. One hundred fifty (150) BLU-111, POLICY JUSTIFICATION Notice of Proposed Issuance of Letter of General Purpose Bomb Offer Pursuant to Section 36(b)(1) of the Six (6) MK-82, Inert Bomb Finland – F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Arms Export Control Act, as amended One (1) FMU-139D/B (D-1) Inert Fuze Aircraft with Air-to-Air Missiles and (i) Prospective Purchaser: Government Non-MDE: Air-to-Ground Precision Guided of Finland Also included are Electronic Warfare Munitions (ii) Total Estimated Value: Systems; Command, Control, The Government of Finland has Major Defense Equipment* ........ $ 8.4 billion Communications, Computer and requested to buy sixty-four (64) F-35 Other ........................................... $ 4.1 billion Intelligence/Communications, Joint Strike Fighter CTOL aircraft; sixty- Total ......................................... $12.5 billion Navigational, and Identification six (66) Pratt & Whitney F-135 engines (C4I/CNI); Autonomic Logistics (64 installed and 2 spares); five hundred (iii) Description and Quantity or Global Support System (ALGS); (500) GBU-53/B Small Diameter Bomb II Quantities of Articles or Services under Operational Data Integrated (SDB II) All-Up Round (AUR); twelve Consideration for Purchase: Network (ODIN); Air System (12) GBU-53/B SDB II Guided Test Major Defense Equipment (MDE): Training Devices; Weapons Vehicles (GTV); twelve (12) GBU-53/B Sixty-four (64) F-35 Joint Strike Employment Capability and other SDB II Captive Carry Vehicles (CCV); Fighter CTOL Aircraft Subsystems, Features, and one hundred fifty (150) Sidewinder Sixty-six (66) Pratt & Whitney F-135 Capabilities; F-35 unique infrared AIM-9X Block II+ (Plus) Tactical Engines (64 installed and 2 spares) flares; reprogramming center access; Missiles; thirty-two (32) Sidewinder Five hundred (500) GBU-53/B Small F-35 Performance Based Logistics; AIM-9X Block II+ (Plus) Captive Air Diameter Bomb II (SDB II) All-Up software development/integration; Training Missiles (CATMs); thirty (30) Round (AUR) aircraft ferry and tanker support; AIM-9X Block II+ (Plus) Sidewinder Twelve (12) GBU-53/B SDB II Guided Detector Laser DSU-38A/B, Detector Tactical Guidance Units; eight (8) AIM- Test Vehicles (GTV) Laser DSU-38A(D-2)/B, KMU- 9X Block
Recommended publications
  • Downloaded April 22, 2006
    SIX DECADES OF GUIDED MUNITIONS AND BATTLE NETWORKS: PROGRESS AND PROSPECTS Barry D. Watts Thinking Center for Strategic Smarter and Budgetary Assessments About Defense www.csbaonline.org Six Decades of Guided Munitions and Battle Networks: Progress and Prospects by Barry D. Watts Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments March 2007 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA) is an independent, nonprofit, public policy research institute established to make clear the inextricable link between near-term and long- range military planning and defense investment strategies. CSBA is directed by Dr. Andrew F. Krepinevich and funded by foundations, corporations, government, and individual grants and contributions. This report is one in a series of CSBA analyses on the emerging military revolution. Previous reports in this series include The Military-Technical Revolution: A Preliminary Assessment (2002), Meeting the Anti-Access and Area-Denial Challenge (2003), and The Revolution in War (2004). The first of these, on the military-technical revolution, reproduces the 1992 Pentagon assessment that precipitated the 1990s debate in the United States and abroad over revolutions in military affairs. Many friends and professional colleagues, both within CSBA and outside the Center, have contributed to this report. Those who made the most substantial improvements to the final manuscript are acknowledged below. However, the analysis and findings are solely the responsibility of the author and CSBA. 1667 K Street, NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 331-7990 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEGEMENTS .................................................. v SUMMARY ............................................................... ix GLOSSARY ………………………………………………………xix I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................... 1 Guided Munitions: Origins in the 1940s............. 3 Cold War Developments and Prospects ............
    [Show full text]
  • Usafalmanac ■ Gallery of USAF Weapons
    USAFAlmanac ■ Gallery of USAF Weapons By Susan H.H. Young fans; each 17,300 lb thrust. Accommodation: two, mission commander and pilot, Bombers on zero/zero ejection seats. B-1 Lancer Dimensions: span 172 ft, length 69 ft, height 17 ft. Brief: A long-range multirole bomber capable of flying Weight: empty 150,000–160,000 lb, gross 350,000 lb. missions over intercontinental range without refueling, then Performance: minimum approach speed 161 mph, penetrating enemy defenses with a heavy load of ordnance. ceiling 50,000 ft, typical estimated unrefueled range for a Function: Long-range conventional bomber. hi-lo-hi mission with 16 B61 nuclear free-fall bombs 5,000 Operator: ACC, ANG. miles, with one aerial refueling more than 10,000 miles. First Flight: Dec. 23, 1974 (B-1A); October 1984 (B-1B). Armament: in a nuclear role: up to 16 nuclear weapons Delivered: June 1985–May 1988. (B-61, B-61 Mod II, B-83). In a conventional role: 16 Mk 84 2,000-lb bombs, up to 16 2,000-lb GBU-36/B (GAM), or up IOC: Oct. 1, 1986, Dyess AFB, Texas (B-1B). B-1B Lancer (Ted Carlson) Production: 104. to eight 4,700-lb GBU-37 (GAM-113) near–precision guided Inventory: 94 (B-1B). weapons. Various other conventional weapons, incl the Mk Ceiling: over 30,000 ft. Unit Location: Active: Dyess AFB, Texas, Ellsworth AFB, S.D., and Mountain Home AFB, Idaho. ANG: McConnell AFB, Kan., and Robins AFB, Ga. Contractor: Boeing North American; AIL Systems; General Electric. Power Plant: four General Electric F101-GE-102 turbo- fans; each 30,780 lb thrust.
    [Show full text]
  • Lrso) Cruise Missile and Its Role in Future Nuclear Forces
    THE LONG-RANGE STANDOFF (LRSO) CRUISE MISSILE AND ITS ROLE IN FUTURE NUCLEAR FORCES National SecurityResearch Perspective Note Dennis Evans | Jonathan Schwalbe NSP_11x17_LRSO_v6.indd 1 7/26/17 1:47 PM THE LONG-RANGE STANDOFF (LRSO) CRUISE MISSILE AND ITS ROLE IN FUTURE NUCLEAR FORCES Dennis Evans Jonathan Schwalbe Copyright © 2017 The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory LLC. All Rights Reserved. This National Security Perspective contains the best opinion of the author(s) at time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of JHU/APL sponsors. JHU/APL has conducted classified analyses that are relevant to discussions on the need for LRSO and/or ICBMs in the future. Other such analyses deal with nonstrategic nuclear weapons. Requests for such briefings can be made by contacting Dennis Evans ([email protected] or 240-228-6916) or Jonathan Schwalbe ([email protected] or 240-228-6439) or by contacting JHU/APL management at david.underhill@ jhuapl.edu, [email protected], or [email protected]. NSAD-R-17-051 THE LONG-RANGE STANDOFF (LRSO) CRUISE MISSILE AND ITS ROLE IN FUTURE NUCLEAR FORCES iii Contents Figures and Tables .......................................................................................................................................................................... v Summary .........................................................................................................................................................................................vii
    [Show full text]
  • Gallery of USAF Weapons
    Almanac USAF■ Gallery of USAF Weapons By Susan H.H. Young Note: Inventory numbers are Total Active Inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 1999. B-1B’s list of weapons, with fleet completion in FY02. The B-1B’s capability is being significantly enhanced by the ongoing Conventional Mission Upgrade Pro- gram (CMUP). This gives the B-1B greater lethality and survivability through the integration of precision and standoff weapons and a robust ECM suite. CMUP includes GPS receivers, a MIL-STD-1760 weapon in- terface, secure radios, and improved computers to support precision weapons, initially the JDAM, fol- lowed by the Joint Standoff Weapon (JSOW) and the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM). The Defensive System Upgrade Program will improve air- crew situational awareness and jamming capability. B-2 Spirit Brief: Stealthy, long-range, multirole bomber that can deliver conventional and nuclear munitions any- where on the globe by flying through previously impen- etrable defenses. Function: Long-range heavy bomber. Operator: ACC. First Flight: July 17, 1989. Delivered: Dec. 17, 1993–present. B-1B Lancer (Ted Carlson) IOC: April 1997, Whiteman AFB, Mo. Production: 21. Inventory: 21. Unit Location: Whiteman AFB, Mo. Contractor: Northrop Grumman, with Boeing, LTV, and General Electric as principal subcontractors. Bombers Power Plant: four General Electric F118-GE-100 turbofans, each 17,300 lb thrust. B-1 Lancer Accommodation: two, mission commander and pi- Brief: A long-range multirole bomber capable of lot, on zero/zero ejection seats. flying missions over intercontinental range without re- Dimensions: span 172 ft, length 69 ft, height 17 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • SVI Foresight Strategic Vision Institute Islamabad
    SVI Foresight Volume 6, Number 10 OCTOBER 2020 Compiled & Edited by: Haris Bilal Malik Strategic Vision Institute Islamabad SVI Foresight Volume 6, Number 10 OCTOBER 2020 Compiled & Edited by: Haris Bilal Malik Strategic Vision Institute (SVI) Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this edition are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Strategic Vision Institute. Strategic Vision Institute (SVI) Strategic Vision Institute (SVI) is an autonomous, multidisciplinary, and non-partisan institution, established in January 2013. It is a non-governmental and non-commercial organization, administered by a Board of Governors (General Body) supervised under a Chairperson and administered by a Management Committee headed by a President/Executive Director. SVI aims to project strategic foresight on issues of national and international import through dispassionate, impartial, and independent research, analyses, and studies. The current spotlight of the SVI is on national security, regional and international peace and stability, strategic studies, nuclear non- proliferation, arms control, and strategic stability, nuclear safety, and security and energy studies. SVI Foresight SVI Foresight is a monthly electronic journal. It has a multi-disciplinary perspective highlighting contemporary strategic and security studies. The Journal is envisioned to be a collection of policy-oriented articles written by its Research Associates, Visiting Faculty, and professional experts. The objective is to provide the readership with a concise all-round and real-time policy-oriented discourse on contemporary strategic regional and international developments, highlighting their relevance to Pakistan. Contents Editor’s Note ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Imran Khan’s Address at UNGA 75th Session: Exposing India’s Fascist Ideology ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cruise Missile Proliferation: Trends, Strategic Implications, and Counterproliferation
    Cruise missile proliferation: Trends, strategic implications, and counterproliferation GLOBAL SECURITY REPORT Fabian Hoffmann March 2021 The European Leadership Network (ELN) is an independent, non- partisan, pan-European network of nearly 200 past, present and future European leaders working to provide practical real-world solutions to political and security challenges. About the author Fabian Hoffmann is a graduate student at King’s College London where he is currently completing his Master’s degree in War Studies. In addition, he works as a Policy Intern at the British American Security Information Council (BASIC) where he supports the Nuclear Responsibilities program and is a Master Thesis Student with MBDA Germany. His research focuses on the proliferation and strategic implications of long-range precision-strike capabilities, cross-domain deterrence, and strategic stability. He can be found on Twitter at @FRHoffmann1 Acknowledgements The author is grateful for conversations with and/or commentary on earlier drafts of this report by Alan Cummings, Elisabeth Suh, Dr. Jürgen Altmann, Dr. Marcel Dickow, Maren Vieluf, Michael Limmer, Andreas Seitz, Elmar Wallner, Anna Książczaková, and Dr. Maximilian Hoell. Special thanks are due to Dr. Karl-Josef Dahlem for his continuous support throughout this research. All remaining mistakes and inaccuracies are the author’s alone. Published by the European Leadership Network, March 2021 European Leadership Network (ELN) 8 St James’s Square London, UK, SE1Y 4JU @theELN europeanleadershipnetwork.org Published under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 © The ELN 2021 The opinions articulated in this report represent the views of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the European Leadership Network or any of its members.
    [Show full text]
  • Armaments Non-Proliferation: the Case of Cruise Missiles
    Artigo recebido em fevereiro de 2014 e aceite para publicação em maio de 2014 ARMAMENTS NON-PROLIFERATION: THE CASE OF CRUISE MISSILES NÃO-PROLIFERAÇÃO DE ARMAMENTOS: O CASO DOS MÍSSEIS DE CRUZEIRO José Carlos Cardoso Mira Coronel Técnico de Manutenção de Armamento e Equipamento da Força Aérea Chefe do Gabinete de Planeamento e Programação Instituto de Estudos Superiores Militares Lisboa, Portugal [email protected] Abstract This article is intended to present an overview of cruise missiles produced by several States and their vertical and horizontal proliferation, especially in what concerns Land Attack Cruise Missiles (LACM), using publicly-available information only. The analysis was limited to LACM capable of delivering a payload of at least 500 kilograms (kg) to a range of at least 300 kilometers (km), or non-conventional weapons. NÃO-PROLIFERAÇÃO DE ARMAMENTOS: O CASO DOS MÍSSEIS CRUZEIRO A characterization of those missiles will be made and a brief historical overview presented, as well as an analysis of the technologies involved, a description of world cruise missile programs and of non-proliferation issues (detailing two multilateral mechanisms in use). The Portuguese aspects of non-proliferation will be addressed, including some proposals for a better addressing of this issue in the appropriate Portuguese fora. We conclude that the issue of cruise missile proliferation involves multiple technological, political, military and commercial aspects, being an issue of concern for several actors of the International System. Keywords: Cruise Missiles, Military Technologies, Non-proliferation. Resumo Com o presente artigo pretende apresentar-se uma panorâmica sobre os mísseis de cruzeiro produzidos por diversos Estados do mundo e respetiva proliferação horizontal e vertical, especialmente no respeitante aos Land Attack Cruise Missiles (LACM), utilizando essencialmente informação pública.
    [Show full text]
  • Science, Technology and Procurement
    Science, Technology and Procurement In this issue of Science, Technology and Procurement the news items have been divided in the following sections: 1. Industry 2. Manufacturing 3. Policy and Standards 4. Systems 5. New Technology 6. Contracts All information has been gathered from open source websites and links to the original information is included with each item. For the first time we have added a section on Industry related news and a section on Policy and Standards, where there are news items of interest we will look to maintain this distinction between systems related news items. Following the last publication there has been better success for the Standard Missile-2 (SM-2) and the US continues to test and develop the Multi Mission Launcher capability. The Cased Telescopic cannon system has now commenced its testing and integration phase on the new UK AJAX platform. MLRS continues to evolve as a weapon system with 2 separate announcements on new missiles for the system. Martin Pope & Dr Michael Sharp, MSIAC Munitions Systems Specialist and PM INDUSTRY Orbital ATK Marks Its One-Year Anniversary - Record New Orders and Important Operational Successes Achieved in All Business Groups Over Last 12 Months. Dulles, Virginia 10 February 2016 – Orbital ATK, Inc. (NYSE: OA), a global leader in aerospace and defense technologies, today marks its first full year of combined operations following the completion of the merger between Orbital Sciences Corporation and Alliant Techsystems, Inc. in February 2015. The merger brought into existence a new $4.5 billion space, defense and aviation systems manufacturer that employs approximately 12,000 people in 18 states across the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ballistic Missile Defense Glossary
    BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE GLOSSARY VERSION 3.0 JUNE 1997 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION 7100 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-7100 PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS PURPOSE The purpose of this glossary is to facilitate a common language within the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO) and the ballistic missile defense community. This glossary supplements other existing Department of Defense (DoD) publications. SCOPE This glossary is not an official DoD publication; it is limited to terminology that relates to ballistic missile defense. A number of computer, software, and engineering terms are included, especially those applicable to BMD. In addition, numerous acquisition terms are included in light of BMDO’s ongoing transition to a more acquisition-oriented agency. Many entries are taken from the DoD 5000-series of directives, the DoD program objective memorandums, the Joint Staff Glossary (Joint Pub 1-02), and the Defense Systems Management College Glossary. A number of outdated or seldom-used terms are also included for historical relevance, though obsolete terms are denoted. WORLD WIDE WEB The BMDO Glossary can be found on the BMDO World Wide Web home page at http://www.acq.osd.mil/bmdo/bmdolink/html/ FORMAT All entries are listed in alphabetical order, including acronyms (which are cross-referenced with their corresponding definition). General terms are defined in a BMD context where appropriate. In cases where a term has more than one BMD-related meaning, multiple definitions are given. Wherever possible, organizational changes occurring since publication of the October 1995 BMDO Glossary are incorporated. Please note that abbreviations and acronyms listed herein are capitalized for ease of reference.
    [Show full text]
  • Missiles for Standoff Attack: Air-Launched Air- To-Surface Munitions Programs
    Order Code RL30552 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Missiles for Standoff Attack: Air-Launched Air- to-Surface Munitions Programs Updated October 17, 2000 (name redacted) Analyst in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Missiles for Standoff Attack: Air-Launched Air-to-Surface Munitions Programs Summary Increasing the standoff range of air-delivered munitions and improving their accuracy and lethality have become matters of major emphasis in U.S. defense plans since the 1991 Gulf War. The 1999 conflict in Kosovo especially highlighted the value of air-to-surface munitions that could be launched from safe standoff ranges and guided to their targets with precision. Since cancellation in late 1994 of the Tri-Service Standoff Attack Missile (TSSAM) program, various alternatives have been proposed, including development of a new missile or a derivative of currently operational missiles. This report focuses six air-to-surface munition programs: the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) the Standoff Land Attack Missile Expanded Response (SLAM-ER), the Joint Stand-Off Weapon (JSOW), the Conventional Air-Launched Cruise Missile (CALCM), and the AGM-142 and AGM-130 missiles. All of these weapons are launched from aircraft, in contrast ships and ground-based missile launchers. The Defense Department’s FY2001 budget included requests of $122.3 million for JASSM and $27.9 million for SLAM-ER as well as requests for other standoff munition programs such as JSOW ($284.7 million) and AGM-130 (about $100 thousand). Appropriations conferees recommended funding SLAM-ER as requested, reduced the JASSM request by $4 million and increased the JSOW request by $6.4 million.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mixed Methods Examination of Cruise Missile Possession and the Initiation of Military Force Dennis Crawford University of Nebraska - Lincoln
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Political Science Department -- Theses, Political Science, Department of Dissertations, and Student Scholarship 8-2019 Cruising Into Conflict: A Mixed Methods Examination of Cruise Missile Possession and the Initiation of Military Force Dennis Crawford University of Nebraska - Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/poliscitheses Part of the Comparative Politics Commons, and the International Relations Commons Crawford, Dennis, "Cruising Into Conflict: A Mixed Methods Examination of Cruise Missile Possession and the Initiation of Military Force" (2019). Political Science Department -- Theses, Dissertations, and Student Scholarship. 53. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/poliscitheses/53 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Political Science, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science Department -- Theses, Dissertations, and Student Scholarship by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. CRUISING INTO CONFLICT: A MIXED METHODS EXAMINATION OF CRUISE MISSILE POSSESSION AND THE INITIATION OF MILITARY FORCE by Dennis P. Crawford A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Major: Political Science Under the Supervision of Professor Ross A. Miller Lincoln, Nebraska August, 2019 CRUISING INTO CONFLICT: A MIXED METHODS EXAMINATION OF CRUISE MISSILE POSSESSION AND THE INITIATION OF MILITARY FORCE Dennis P. Crawford, Ph.D. University of Nebraska, 2019 Advisor: Ross A. Miller This research examines the effect of cruise missile possession on state behavior. Specifically, it seeks to determine if countries who possess cruise missiles are more likely to initiate a military threat, display, or use of force than countries who do not possess cruise missiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Options for Fielding Ground-Launched Long-Range Missiles
    CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE Options for Fielding Ground-Launched Long-Range Missiles FEBRUARY 2020 At a Glance The Department of Defense (DoD) has expressed concern that potential adversaries such as Russia and China could prevent the United States from easily gaining air and naval superiority in future conflicts, which could hinder its ability to prosecute military campaigns in certain scenarios in the Baltic region or the South China Sea. The Congressional Budget Office identified several existing weapon systems that DoD could adapt relatively rapidly, at a cost of about $1 billion to $6 billion (in 2020 dollars) for seven batteries, to give U.S. ground forces some limited long-range capabilities in those scenarios: • Option 1: A Cruise Missile for Attacking Land Targets. DoD could procure and field a ground-launched Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile– Extended Range (JASSM-ER). Option 1 has the lowest estimated up-front cost, $1.3 billion, of the four options CBO examined, but the JASSM-ER would have minimal value in either a South China Sea or a Baltic scenario. • Option 2: An Antiship Cruise Missile. DoD could procure and field a ground-launched Long-Range Antiship Missile (LRASM) at an estimated up-front cost of $2.2 billion. The LRASM could be quite valuable in a South China Sea scenario but would have much less value in a Baltic scenario, where Russian naval forces present less of a threat. • Option 3: An Air Defense Missile. DoD could procure and field a ground- launched Standard Missile 6 (SM-6), as well as an air and missile defense radar for each battery, at an estimated up-front cost of $4.6 billion.
    [Show full text]