DOCSLIB.ORG

Downloaded April 22, 2006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Downloaded April 22, 2006 SIX DECADES OF GUIDED MUNITIONS AND BATTLE NETWORKS: PROGRESS AND PROSPECTS Barry D. Watts Thinking Center for Strategic Smarter and Budgetary Assessments About Defense www.csbaonline.org Six Decades of Guided Munitions and Battle Networks: Progress and Prospects by Barry D. Watts Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments March 2007 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA) is an independent, nonprofit, public policy research institute established to make clear the inextricable link between near-term and long- range military planning and defense investment strategies. CSBA is directed by Dr. Andrew F. Krepinevich and funded by foundations, corporations, government, and individual grants and contributions. This report is one in a series of CSBA analyses on the emerging military revolution. Previous reports in this series include The Military-Technical Revolution: A Preliminary Assessment (2002), Meeting the Anti-Access and Area-Denial Challenge (2003), and The Revolution in War (2004). The first of these, on the military-technical revolution, reproduces the 1992 Pentagon assessment that precipitated the 1990s debate in the United States and abroad over revolutions in military affairs. Many friends and professional colleagues, both within CSBA and outside the Center, have contributed to this report. Those who made the most substantial improvements to the final manuscript are acknowledged below. However, the analysis and findings are solely the responsibility of the author and CSBA. 1667 K Street, NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 331-7990 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEGEMENTS .................................................. v SUMMARY ............................................................... ix GLOSSARY ………………………………………………………xix I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................... 1 Guided Munitions: Origins in the 1940s............. 3 Cold War Developments and Prospects ............. 6 The Origins of Battle Networks ....................... 17 Early versus Late Adopters.............................. 19 The Rest of This Report ................................... 23 II. HOW TO THINK ABOUT GUIDED MUNITIONS AND BATTLE NETWORKS…..................................... 25 Definitional Matters and Scope........................ 26 War’s Nature versus War’s Conduct ................ 32 The Influence of Technology and Numbers ..... 38 The Problems of Recognizing Revolutionary Change ........................... 65 Questions about Future War and an Anomaly........................................... 81 III. PLATFORM-VERSUS-PLATFORM CASES… ............... 91 US Navy Torpedoes after World War II ........... 92 Solid-State Microelectronics.......................... 108 The AIM-7 Sparrow III.................................. 115 Styx and Harpoon Anti-Ship Missiles ............. 149 The Shillelagh Anti-Tank Missile.................... 162 IV. SURFACE-ATTACK CASES… ................................ 175 Laser-Guided Bombs ..................................... 179 The Copperhead Anti-tank Round.................. 204 The Joint Direct Attack Munition ................... 213 TLAM and CALCM........................................... 230 CEC as a Targeting Network .......................... 248 Higher-Level Effects and Mass....................... 252 V. IMPLICATIONS AND PROSPECTS…......................... 257 The Guided-Munitons Era as an RMA ............. 257 Drivers and Causation ................................... 266 i Diffusion and Reproducibility ........................ 270 Characteristics of the Precision- Strike Regime ..................................... 276 Prospects for Change: Robotics, Directed Energy, Precision Information ............ 280 Final Thoughts .............................................. 289 INDEX ………………………………………………………... 291 ii FIGURES Fig. 1: World War II Guided Munitions .............. 4 Fig. 2: Talos RIM-8J Naval SAM ......................... 5 Fig. 3: SA-2 Surface-to-Air Missile..................... 7 Fig. 4: US Guided and Unguided Munitions Expenditures in Four Campaigns ........ 20 Fig. 5: The Assault Breaker Concept ................ 29 Fig. 6: The Skeet Submunition......................... 30 Fig. 7: France, May 1940 ................................. 39 Fig. 8: Force Ratios versus Battle Outcomes.... 43 Fig. 9: F-15 versus Red Loss Rates (CAP Mission) by SA and Weapons.............. 52 Fig. 10: Mark-24 FIDO “Mine” ......................... 99 Fig. 11: USS U-3008 Off the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, ME, August 1946..... 105 Fig. 12: “Joe 1” ............................................. 123 Fig. 13: SAGE Air Defense Center, McGuire AFB, NJ, Circa 1958 .......................... 125 Fig. 14: AIM-7 Sparrow III............................ 131 Fig. 15: F-4 with AIM-7s and AIM-4s............. 132 Fig. 16: Styx and Harpoon ASMs.................... 151 Fig. 17: Shillelagh Missile Fired by a Sheridan........................................... 163 Fig. 18: Iraqi T-72 Hit by a DU Antitank Round............................................... 170 Fig. 19: US Guided Expenditures in Four Campaigns................................ 177 Fig. 20: Early ("Paveway I") LGBs................. 185 Fig. 21: The Thanh Hoa Bridge Before and After a May 13, 1972, Strike with LGBs ......................................... 188 Fig. 22: Paveway II and III LGBs .................. 192 Fig. 23: Pave Tack Laser-Designator Pod on an F-4E ................................. 194 Fig. 24: LGB Damage against Hardened Aircraft Shelters, 1991 ..................... 198 Fig. 25: Unguided versus Guided Munitions/Day, 1991-2003 .............. 200 Fig. 26: The M712 Copperhead ...................... 205 Fig. 27: Copperhead Trajectories................... 208 Fig. 28: JDAMs............................................... 216 iii Fig. 29: B-2/JDAM Results, 1999................... 221 Fig. 30: Block-II GPS Satellites ..................... 228 Fig. 31: Tactical Tomahawk and CALCM......... 234 Fig. 32: JDAM versus TLAM Campaign Costs (250 Munitions/Day) .............. 241 Fig. 33: Aegis and SM-2................................. 249 Fig. 34: Guided-Munitions Accuracy .............. 261 Fig. 35: SDB I ................................................ 262 Fig. 36: LOCAAS ............................................ 281 Fig. 37: Tactical High-Energy Laser ............... 284 TABLES Table 1: Allied and German Forces and Force Ratios, 1940 ............................. 40 Table 2: AMRAAM OUE Test Matrix .................. 51 Table 3: Miitary Revolutions versus RMAs ....... 80 Table 4: AIM-7 Performance in SEA............... 140 Table 5: AIM-7M Performance in Desert Storm .................................... 143 Table 6: AIM-7M Performance in Decisive Engagements .................................. 146 Table 7: US and Soviet Conventional Naval Inventories, FY 1990 ........................ 159 Table 8: US TLAM and CALCM Expenditures... 238 iv Acknowledgements Since early 2003, numerous individuals have made contributions, some large, some small, to this report. The technical and tactical con- tent of the case studies dictated many narrowly focused discussions with colleagues and friends on specific details, and these contributions are mostly acknowledged in footnotes. There were, however, others whose insights, suggestions, or criticisms eventually affected the over- all structure, framework, and conclusions in this report. Foremost was Andrew W. Marshall, the Director of the Office of Net Assessment (ONA), Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD). He insisted from the outset on a wide range of cases spanning the various military services and war-fighting communities. Having been involved in the controversy between OSD and the US Army that culminated in cancellation of the planned replacement for the Paladin self-propelled howitzer, Crusader, I was already aware that some US military com- munities had embraced guided-munitions much earlier than others. Nevertheless, Marshall’s insistence that I needed to explore cases that went well beyond the experience of any single military service or mis- sion area proved to be wise counsel. Most of the substantive conclusions about guided munitions and battle networks in the summary and concluding chapter coalesced during discussions with my CSBA colleague Robert Work during 2006. The original draft of this report had been completed in 2004 and then was set aside during most of 2005. When I returned to the v manuscript in early 2006, it quickly became painfully clear that con- siderable restructuring was needed. In the end, three of five chapters were virtually rewritten from a clean sheet of paper and most of the cases studies in the other two chapters were substantially reworked. What made the discussions with Bob Work so valuable was the experi- ence he brought to the table from several years of observing and par- ticipating in ONA-sponsored war games, especially those in the Future Warfare 20XX and Strategic Challenge series of games. These games had explored future US force structures in the 2025 timeframe across a range of scenarios. As it turned out, the patterns I was seeing by this time in the guided-munitions case studies resonated with those Work was seeing in many of the 20XX and Strategic Challenge games. On the pivotal issue of a causal explanation for why some war-fighting communities had been early adopters of guided munitions and battle networks, Bob was in fact a step or two ahead of me in seeing the deeper pattern. Two outside readers,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2018 Annual Report Our Leadership Team (From Left to Right): Frank A
    FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS In millions, except per share data 2018 2017 2016 Net Sales $53,762 $49,960 $47,290 Segment Operating Profit 5,877 5,092 4,982 Consolidated Operating Profit 7,334 6,744 5,888 Net Earnings From Continuing Operations 5,046 1,890 3,661 Net Earnings 5,046 1,963 5,173 Diluted Earnings Per Common Share Continuing Operations 17.59 6.50 12.08 Net Earnings 17.59 6.75 17.07 Cash Dividends Per Common Share 8.20 7.46 6.77 Average Diluted Common Shares Outstanding 287 291 303 Cash and Cash Equivalents $772$ 2,861 $ 1,837 Total Assets 44,876 46,620 47,560 Total Debt, net 14,104 14,263 14,282 Total Equity (Deficit) 1,449 (776) 1,477 Common Shares Outstanding at Year-End 281 284 289 Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities $3,138 $ 6,476 $ 5,189 NOTE: For additional information regarding the amounts presented above, see the Form 10-K portion of this Annual Report. A reconciliation of Segment Operating Profit to Consolidated Operating Profit is included on the page preceding the back cover of this Annual Report. On the Cover: F-35B Lightning II On September 29, 2018, the first F-35B Lightning II stealth fighters landed on the flight deck of HMS Queen Elizabeth, as Britain’s newest Royal Navy aircraft carrier conducted trials off the Eastern Seaboard of the United States. These developmental trials included more than 500 take-offs and landings from the warship over an 11-week period. The F-35B is one of three variants of the world’s most advanced supersonic fifth-generation fighter jet.
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared by Textore, Inc. Peter Wood, David Yang, and Roger Cliff November 2020
    AIR-TO-AIR MISSILES CAPABILITIES AND DEVELOPMENT IN CHINA Prepared by TextOre, Inc. Peter Wood, David Yang, and Roger Cliff November 2020 Printed in the United States of America by the China Aerospace Studies Institute ISBN 9798574996270 To request additional copies, please direct inquiries to Director, China Aerospace Studies Institute, Air University, 55 Lemay Plaza, Montgomery, AL 36112 All photos licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license, or under the Fair Use Doctrine under Section 107 of the Copyright Act for nonprofit educational and noncommercial use. All other graphics created by or for China Aerospace Studies Institute Cover art is "J-10 fighter jet takes off for patrol mission," China Military Online 9 October 2018. http://eng.chinamil.com.cn/view/2018-10/09/content_9305984_3.htm E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.airuniversity.af.mil/CASI https://twitter.com/CASI_Research @CASI_Research https://www.facebook.com/CASI.Research.Org https://www.linkedin.com/company/11049011 Disclaimer The views expressed in this academic research paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Government or the Department of Defense. In accordance with Air Force Instruction 51-303, Intellectual Property, Patents, Patent Related Matters, Trademarks and Copyrights; this work is the property of the U.S. Government. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights Reproduction and printing is subject to the Copyright Act of 1976 and applicable treaties of the United States. This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This publication is provided for noncommercial use only.
    [Show full text]
  • JP 3-09.3, Close Air Support, As a Basis for Conducting CAS
    Joint Publication 3-09.3 Close Air Support 08 July 2009 PREFACE 1. Scope This publication provides joint doctrine for planning and executing close air support. 2. Purpose This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations and provides the doctrinal basis for interagency coordination and for US military involvement in multinational operations. It provides military guidance for the exercise of authority by combatant commanders and other joint force commanders (JFCs) and prescribes joint doctrine for operations, education, and training. It provides military guidance for use by the Armed Forces in preparing their appropriate plans. It is not the intent of this publication to restrict the authority of the JFC from organizing the force and executing the mission in a manner the JFC deems most appropriate to ensure unity of effort in the accomplishment of the overall objective. 3. Application a. Joint doctrine established in this publication applies to the Joint Staff, commanders of combatant commands, subunified commands, joint task forces, and subordinate components of these commands, and the Services. b. The guidance in this publication is authoritative; as such, this doctrine will be followed except when, in the judgment of the commander, exceptional circumstances dictate otherwise. If conflicts arise between the contents of this publication and the contents of Service publications, this publication will take precedence unless the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, normally in coordination with the other members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has provided more current and specific guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 11 Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for Complex Operations, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, Center for Technology and National Security Policy, Center for Transatlantic Security Studies, and Conflict Records Research Center. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Unified Combatant Commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: Kathleen Bailey presents evidence of forgeries to the press corps. Credit: The Washington Times Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference By Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 11 Series Editor: Nicholas Rostow National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. June 2012 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • CRUISE MISSILE THREAT Volume 2: Emerging Cruise Missile Threat
    By Systems Assessment Group NDIA Strike, Land Attack and Air Defense Committee August 1999 FEASIBILITY OF THIRD WORLD ADVANCED BALLISTIC AND CRUISE MISSILE THREAT Volume 2: Emerging Cruise Missile Threat The Systems Assessment Group of the National Defense Industrial Association ( NDIA) Strike, Land Attack and Air Defense Committee performed this study as a continuing examination of feasible Third World missile threats. Volume 1 provided an assessment of the feasibility of the long range ballistic missile threats (released by NDIA in October 1998). Volume 2 uses aerospace industry judgments and experience to assess Third World cruise missile acquisition and development that is “emerging” as a real capability now. The analyses performed by industry under the broad title of “Feasibility of Third World Advanced Ballistic & Cruise Missile Threat” incorporate information only from unclassified sources. Commercial GPS navigation instruments, compact avionics, flight programming software, and powerful, light-weight jet propulsion systems provide the tools needed for a Third World country to upgrade short-range anti-ship cruise missiles or to produce new land-attack cruise missiles (LACMs) today. This study focuses on the question of feasibility of likely production methods rather than relying on traditional intelligence based primarily upon observed data. Published evidence of technology and weapons exports bears witness to the failure of international agreements to curtail cruise missile proliferation. The study recognizes the role LACMs developed by Third World countries will play in conjunction with other new weapons, for regional force projection. LACMs are an “emerging” threat with immediate and dire implications for U.S. freedom of action in many regions .
    [Show full text]
  • Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory figures As of Sept
    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2014. By Aaron M. U. Church, Associate Editor I 2015 USAF Almanac BOMBER AIRCRAFT flight controls actuate trailing edge surfaces that combine aileron, elevator, and rudder functions. New EHF satcom and high-speed computer upgrade B-1 Lancer recently entered full production. Both are part of the Defensive Management Brief: A long-range bomber capable of penetrating enemy defenses and System-Modernization (DMS-M). Efforts are underway to develop a new VLF delivering the largest weapon load of any aircraft in the inventory. receiver for alternative comms. Weapons integration includes the improved COMMENTARY GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator and JASSM-ER and future weapons The B-1A was initially proposed as replacement for the B-52, and four pro- such as GBU-53 SDB II, GBU-56 Laser JDAM, JDAM-5000, and LRSO. Flex- totypes were developed and tested in 1970s before program cancellation in ible Strike Package mods will feed GPS data to the weapons bays to allow 1977. The program was revived in 1981 as B-1B. The vastly upgraded aircraft weapons to be guided before release, to thwart jamming. It also will move added 74,000 lb of usable payload, improved radar, and reduced radar cross stores management to a new integrated processor. Phase 2 will allow nuclear section, but cut maximum speed to Mach 1.2. The B-1B first saw combat in and conventional weapons to be carried simultaneously to increase flexibility. Iraq during Desert Fox in December 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • The Organizational Process and Bureaucratic Politics Paradigms: Retrospect and Prospect Author(S): David A
    The Organizational Process and Bureaucratic Politics Paradigms: Retrospect and Prospect Author(s): David A. Welch Source: International Security , Fall, 1992, Vol. 17, No. 2 (Fall, 1992), pp. 112-146 Published by: The MIT Press Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2539170 REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2539170?seq=1&cid=pdf- reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms The MIT Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to International Security This content downloaded from 209.6.197.28 on Wed, 07 Oct 2020 15:39:26 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms The Organizational David A. Welch Process and Bureaucratic Politics Paradigms Retrospect and Prospect 1991 marked the twentieth anniversary of the publication of Graham Allison's Essence of De- cision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. ' The influence of this work has been felt far beyond the study of international politics. Since 1971, it has been cited in over 1,100 articles in journals listed in the Social Sciences Citation Index, in every periodical touching political science, and in others as diverse as The American Journal of Agricultural Economics and The Journal of Nursing Adminis- tration.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 HISTORY and DEVELOPMENT of MILITARY LASERS
    History and Development of Military Lasers Chapter 2 HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF MILITARY LASERS JACK B. KELLER, JR* INTRODUCTION INVENTING THE LASER MILITARIZING THE LASER SEARCHING FOR HIGH-ENERGY LASER WEAPONS SEARCHING FOR LOW-ENERGY LASER WEAPONS RETURNING TO HIGHER ENERGIES SUMMARY *Lieutenant Colonel, US Army (Retired); formerly, Foreign Science Information Officer, US Army Medical Research Detachment-Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, 7965 Dave Erwin Drive, Brooks City-Base, Texas 78235 25 Biomedical Implications of Military Laser Exposure INTRODUCTION This chapter will examine the history of the laser, Military advantage is greatest when details are con- from theory to demonstration, for its impact upon the US cealed from real or potential adversaries (eg, through military. In the field of military science, there was early classification). Classification can remain in place long recognition that lasers can be visually and cutaneously after a program is aborted, if warranted to conceal hazardous to military personnel—hazards documented technological details or pathways not obvious or easily in detail elsewhere in this volume—and that such hazards deduced but that may be relevant to future develop- must be mitigated to ensure military personnel safety ments. Thus, many details regarding developmental and mission success. At odds with this recognition was military laser systems cannot be made public; their the desire to harness the laser’s potential application to a descriptions here are necessarily vague. wide spectrum of military tasks. This chapter focuses on Once fielded, system details usually, but not always, the history and development of laser systems that, when become public. Laser systems identified here represent used, necessitate highly specialized biomedical research various evolutionary states of the art in laser technol- as described throughout this volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Master List of Games This Is a List of Every Game on a Fully Loaded SKG Retro Box, and Which System(S) They Appear On
    Master List of Games This is a list of every game on a fully loaded SKG Retro Box, and which system(s) they appear on. Keep in mind that the same game on different systems may be vastly different in graphics and game play. In rare cases, such as Aladdin for the Sega Genesis and Super Nintendo, it may be a completely different game. System Abbreviations: • GB = Game Boy • GBC = Game Boy Color • GBA = Game Boy Advance • GG = Sega Game Gear • N64 = Nintendo 64 • NES = Nintendo Entertainment System • SMS = Sega Master System • SNES = Super Nintendo • TG16 = TurboGrafx16 1. '88 Games (Arcade) 2. 007: Everything or Nothing (GBA) 3. 007: NightFire (GBA) 4. 007: The World Is Not Enough (N64, GBC) 5. 10 Pin Bowling (GBC) 6. 10-Yard Fight (NES) 7. 102 Dalmatians - Puppies to the Rescue (GBC) 8. 1080° Snowboarding (N64) 9. 1941: Counter Attack (TG16, Arcade) 10. 1942 (NES, Arcade, GBC) 11. 1942 (Revision B) (Arcade) 12. 1943 Kai: Midway Kaisen (Japan) (Arcade) 13. 1943: Kai (TG16) 14. 1943: The Battle of Midway (NES, Arcade) 15. 1944: The Loop Master (Arcade) 16. 1999: Hore, Mitakotoka! Seikimatsu (NES) 17. 19XX: The War Against Destiny (Arcade) 18. 2 on 2 Open Ice Challenge (Arcade) 19. 2010: The Graphic Action Game (Colecovision) 20. 2020 Super Baseball (SNES, Arcade) 21. 21-Emon (TG16) 22. 3 Choume no Tama: Tama and Friends: 3 Choume Obake Panic!! (GB) 23. 3 Count Bout (Arcade) 24. 3 Ninjas Kick Back (SNES, Genesis, Sega CD) 25. 3-D Tic-Tac-Toe (Atari 2600) 26. 3-D Ultra Pinball: Thrillride (GBC) 27.
    [Show full text]
  • Cbrn Protection Soldier Modernisation Debrief Malaysian Armed Forces Naval Guns Asia-Pacific Fighter Market Precision Guided Artillery
    Volume 24/issue 3 april/may 2016 us$15 AsiA PA cific’s LA rgest c ircuLAted d efence MA g A Zine CBRN PROTECTION SOLDIER MODERNISATION DEBRIEF MALAYSIAN ARMED FORCES NAVAL GUNS ASIA-PACIFIC FIGHTER MARKET PRECISION GUIDED ARTILLERY www.asianmilitaryreview.com new Datron VHF ad FULL PAGE Armada.PDF 1 3/16/16 12:11 PM C M Y CM MY CY CMY K 02 | ASIAN MILITARY REVIEW | Contents april/may 2016 VOlUmE 24 / iSSUE 3 VexIng QueSTIonS 10 Malaysia faces both conventional and unconventional threats. Dzirhan Mahadzir examines how the country is meeting such risks in a fiscally-constrained climate. Front Cover Photo: Iraq’s army has increasingly been on the frontline of chemical weapons attack, as examined in Andy Oppenheimer’s Countering the Chemicals article in this issue © US DoD 16 34 40 44 Soldier The Hertz Cannon Fodder Countering Modernisation the Chemicals Modernisation of infantry Locker Naval gunfire support Andy Oppenheimer examines soldier equipment, particularly Thomas Withington examines is essential to naval and the continuing weapons of concerning individual weapons, some of the technical challenges amphibious operations. mass destruction threat to is afoot in the Asia-Pacific with presented to tactical radio Gerrard Cowan examines the Asia-Pacific, and the Andrew White giving a round- engineers when designing such recent developments in this measures being taken to up of the latest developments. equipment for the Asia-Pacific domain combat it. region. 22 28 05 Spot on! Role With It Stephen W. Miller reviews The market for new and some of the ongoing efforts to upgraded multi-role combat improve the precision of artillery aircraft is in rude health across fire to enhance its support of Thomas Withington’s regular column providing all of the latest news the Asia-Pacific region, Joetey ground manoeuvre.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Posture Commission
    Perry and Schlesinger and Perry America’s Strategic Posture Americ a’s ow to secure the nuclear peace remains one of the most profound questions of the modern era. Twenty years after the end of the Cold War Hand with the arrival of a new administration in Washington, it is time to think through fundamental questions about the purposes of nuclear deterrence Strategic and the character of the U.S. strategic posture. While the existential threat to the United States has decreased, the rising threat of catastrophic terrorism, the possession and spread of nuclear weapons by other states, and a general worldwide nuclear renaissance continue to influence decisions about America’s Posture strategic posture. Recognizing the changing character of these threats, Congress formed a The Final Report of the commission in 2008 to examine the United States’ long-term strategic posture and make recommendations. For more than eleven months this bipartisan Congressional Commission commission of leading experts on national security, arms control, and nuclear America’s Strategic Posture technology met with Congressional leaders, military officers, high-level officials of several countries, arms control groups, and technical experts to assess the on the Strategic Posture appropriate roles for nuclear weapons, nonproliferation programs, and missile defenses. This official edition contains a discussion of key questions and issues of the United States as well as the Commission’s findings and recommendations for tailoring U.S. strategic posture to new and emerging requirements
    [Show full text]
  • Actual Problems Актуальные Проблемы
    АКАДЕМИЯ НАУК АВИАЦИИ И ВОЗДУХОПЛАВАНИЯ РОССИЙСКАЯ АКАДЕМИЯ КОСМОНАВТИКИ ИМ. К.Э.ЦИОЛКОВСКОГО RUSSIAN ASTRONAUTICS ACADEMY OF K.E.TSIOLKOVSKY'S NAME ACADEMY OF AVIATION AND AERONAUTICS SCIENCES СССР 7 195 ISSN 1727-6853 12.04.1961 АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ АВИАЦИОННЫХ И АЭРОКОСМИЧЕСКИХ СИСТЕМ процессы, модели, эксперимент 1(42), т.21, 2016 RUSSIAN-AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF AVIATION AND AEROSPACE SYSTEMS processes, models, experiment УРНАЛ 1(42), v.21, 2016 УЧНЫЙ Ж О-АМЕРИКАНСКИЙ НА ОССИЙСК Р Казань Daytona Beach А К Т УА Л Ь Н Ы Е П Р О Б Л Е М Ы А В И А Ц И О Н Н Ы Х И А Э Р О К О С М И Ч Е С К И Х С И С Т Е М Казань, Дайтона Бич Вып. 1 (42), том 21, 1-210, 2016 СОДЕРЖАНИЕ CONTENTS С.К.Крикалёв, О.А.Сапрыкин 1 S.K.Krikalev, O.A.Saprykin Пилотируемые Лунные миссии: Manned Moon missions: problems and задачи и перспективы prospects В.Е.Бугров 28 V.E.Bugrov О государственном управлении About government management of программами пилотируемых manned space flights programs космических полетов (критический (critical analysis of problems in анализ проблем отечественной Russian astronautics of the past and космонавтики прошлого и present) настоящего) А.В.Даниленко, К.С.Ёлкин, 90 A.V.Danilenko, K.S.Elkin, С.Ц.Лягушина S.C.Lyagushina Проект программы развития в Project of Russian program on России перспективной космической technology development of prospective технологии – космических тросовых space tethers applications систем Г.Р.Успенский 102 G.R.Uspenskii Прогнозирование космической Forecasting of space activity on деятельности по пилотируемой manned astronautics космонавтике А.В.Шевяков 114 A.V.Shevyakov Математические методы обработки Mathematical methods of images изображений в аэрокосмических processing in aerospace information информационных системах systems Р.С.Зарипов 140 R.S.Zaripov Роль и место военно-транспортных Russian native military transport самолетов в истории авиации aircrafts: history and experience of life России, опыт их боевого применения (part II) (ч.
    [Show full text]