A Comparison of the Diets Selected by Merino and Dorper Sheep on Three Range Types of the Karoo, South Africa
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Phytosociology of the Upper Orange River Valley, South Africa
PHYTOSOCIOLOGY OF THE UPPER ORANGE RIVER VALLEY, SOUTH AFRICA A SYNTAXONOMICAL AND SYNECOLOGICAL STUDY M.J.A.WERGER PROMOTOR: Prof. Dr. V. WESTHOFF PHYTOSOCIOLOGY OF THE UPPER ORANGE RIVER VALLEY, SOUTH AFRICA A SYNTAXONOMICAL AND SYNECOLOGICAL STUDY PROEFSCHRIFT TER VERKRUGING VAN DE GRAAD VAN DOCTOR IN DE WISKUNDE EN NATUURWETENSCHAPPEN AAN DE KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT TE NIJMEGEN, OP GEZAG VAN DE RECTOR MAGNIFICUS PROF. MR. F J.F.M. DUYNSTEE VOLGENS BESLUIT VAN HET COLLEGE VAN DECANEN IN HET OPENBAAR TE VERDEDIGEN OP 10 MEI 1973 DES NAMIDDAGS TE 4.00 UUR. DOOR MARINUS JOHANNES ANTONIUS WERGER GEBOREN TE ENSCHEDE 1973 V&R PRETORIA aan mijn ouders Frontiepieae: Panorama drawn by R.J. GORDON when he discovered the Orange River at "De Fraaye Schoot" near the present Bethulie, probably on the 23rd December 1777. I. INTRODUCTION When the government of the Republic of South Africa in the early sixties decided to initiate a comprehensive water development scheme of its largest single water resource, the Orange River, this gave rise to a wide range of basic and applied scientific sur veys of that area. The reasons for these surveys were threefold: (1) The huge capital investment on such a water scheme can only be justified economically on a long term basis. Basic to this is that the waterworks be protected, over a long period of time, against inefficiency caused by for example silting. Therefore, management reports of the catchment area should.be produced. (2) In order to enable effective long term planning of the management and use of the natural resources in the area it is necessary to know the state of the local ecosystems before a major change is instituted. -
Anthemideae Christoph Oberprieler, Sven Himmelreich, Mari Källersjö, Joan Vallès, Linda E
Chapter38 Anthemideae Christoph Oberprieler, Sven Himmelreich, Mari Källersjö, Joan Vallès, Linda E. Watson and Robert Vogt HISTORICAL OVERVIEW The circumscription of Anthemideae remained relatively unchanged since the early artifi cial classifi cation systems According to the most recent generic conspectus of Com- of Lessing (1832), Hoff mann (1890–1894), and Bentham pos itae tribe Anthemideae (Oberprieler et al. 2007a), the (1873), and also in more recent ones (e.g., Reitbrecht 1974; tribe consists of 111 genera and ca. 1800 species. The Heywood and Humphries 1977; Bremer and Humphries main concentrations of members of Anthemideae are in 1993), with Cotula and Ursinia being included in the tribe Central Asia, the Mediterranean region, and southern despite extensive debate (Bentham 1873; Robinson and Africa. Members of the tribe are well known as aromatic Brettell 1973; Heywood and Humphries 1977; Jeff rey plants, and some are utilized for their pharmaceutical 1978; Gadek et al. 1989; Bruhl and Quinn 1990, 1991; and/or pesticidal value (Fig. 38.1). Bremer and Humphries 1993; Kim and Jansen 1995). The tribe Anthemideae was fi rst described by Cassini Subtribal classifi cation, however, has created considerable (1819: 192) as his eleventh tribe of Compositae. In a diffi culties throughout the taxonomic history of the tribe. later publication (Cassini 1823) he divided the tribe into Owing to the artifi ciality of a subtribal classifi cation based two major groups: “Anthémidées-Chrysanthémées” and on the presence vs. absence of paleae, numerous attempts “An thé midées-Prototypes”, based on the absence vs. have been made to develop a more satisfactory taxonomy presence of paleae (receptacular scales). -
The Uthukela District Municipality Biodiversity Sector Plan. Unpublished Report, Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife, Pietermaritzburg
BIODIVERSITY SECTOR PLAN FOR THE UTHUKELA DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, KWAZULU-NATAL TECHNICAL REPORT Authors: Afzelia Environmental Consultants cc Wolfgang Kanz John Richardson Editors Tim O’Connor & Associates Tim O’Connor Contributors EnvironDev Gina Thompson Suggested Citation: Kanz W.A., O’Connor T.G., Richardson J., Nel G, Nel, W. The uThukela District Municipality Biodiversity Sector Plan. Unpublished report, Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife, Pietermaritzburg. 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Biodiversity Act introduced several legislated planning tools to assist with the management and conservation of South Africa’s biological diversity. These include the declaration of “Bioregions” and the publication of “Bioregional Plans”. Bioregional plans are usually an output of a systematic spatial conservation assessment of a region. They identify areas of conservation priority, and constraints and opportunities for implementation of the plan. The precursor to a Bioregional Plan is a Biodiversity Sector Plan (BSP), which is the official reference for biodiversity priorities to be taken into account in land-use planning and decision-making by all sectors within the District Municipality. The consultant team was appointed to fulfil the requirements of a BSP for the uThukela District Municipality, as informed by SANBI, the Bioregional Guidelines (DEAT, 2007), current best practice, and the EKZNW Project Terms of Reference. The final product is a series of maps highlighting those areas that are critically important for biodiversity, with accompanying land-use and management guidelines that serve to guide decision-making and inform multi-sectoral planning. The process involved extensive mapping of vegetation types and species data (where available), ecological processes, transformation and threats, and setting of biodiversity targets. -
Bulletin of the Natural History Museum
Bulletin of _ The Natural History Bfit-RSH MU8&M PRIteifTBD QENERAl LIBRARY Botany Series VOLUME 23 NUMBER 2 25 NOVEMBER 1993 The Bulletin of The Natural History Museum (formerly: Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History)), instituted in 1949, is issued in four scientific series, Botany, Entomology, Geology (incorporating Mineralogy) and Zoology. The Botany Series is edited in the Museum's Department of Botany Keeper of Botany: Dr S. Blackmore Editor of Bulletin: Dr R. Huxley Assistant Editor: Mrs M.J. West Papers in the Bulletin are primarily the results of research carried out on the unique and ever- growing collections of the Museum, both by the scientific staff and by specialists from elsewhere who make use of the Museum's resources. Many of the papers are works of reference that will remain indispensable for years to come. All papers submitted for publication are subjected to external peer review for acceptance. A volume contains about 160 pages, made up by two numbers, published in the Spring and Autumn. Subscriptions may be placed for one or more of the series on an annual basis. Individual numbers and back numbers can be purchased and a Bulletin catalogue, by series, is available. Orders and enquiries should be sent to: Intercept Ltd. P.O. Box 716 Andover Hampshire SPIO lYG Telephone: (0264) 334748 Fax: (0264) 334058 WorW Lwr abbreviation: Bull. nat. Hist. Mus. Lond. (Bot.) © The Natural History Museum, 1993 Botany Series ISSN 0968-0446 Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 55-177 The Natural History Museum Cromwell Road London SW7 5BD Issued 25 November 1993 Typeset by Ann Buchan (Typesetters), Middlesex Printed in Great Britain at The Alden Press. -
Weed Categories for Natural and Agricultural Ecosystem Management
Weed Categories for Natural and Agricultural Ecosystem Management R.H. Groves (Convenor), J.R. Hosking, G.N. Batianoff, D.A. Cooke, I.D. Cowie, R.W. Johnson, G.J. Keighery, B.J. Lepschi, A.A. Mitchell, M. Moerkerk, R.P. Randall, A.C. Rozefelds, N.G. Walsh and B.M. Waterhouse DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FISHERIES AND FORESTRY Weed categories for natural and agricultural ecosystem management R.H. Groves1 (Convenor), J.R. Hosking2, G.N. Batianoff3, D.A. Cooke4, I.D. Cowie5, R.W. Johnson3, G.J. Keighery6, B.J. Lepschi7, A.A. Mitchell8, M. Moerkerk9, R.P. Randall10, A.C. Rozefelds11, N.G. Walsh12 and B.M. Waterhouse13 1 CSIRO Plant Industry & CRC for Australian Weed Management, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601 2 NSW Agriculture & CRC for Australian Weed Management, RMB 944, Tamworth, NSW 2340 3 Queensland Herbarium, Mt Coot-tha Road, Toowong, Qld 4066 4 Animal & Plant Control Commission, Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation, GPO Box 2834, Adelaide, SA 5001 5 NT Herbarium, Department of Primary Industries & Fisheries, GPO Box 990, Darwin, NT 0801 6 Department of Conservation & Land Management, PO Box 51, Wanneroo, WA 6065 7 Australian National Herbarium, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601 8 Northern Australia Quarantine Strategy, AQIS & CRC for Australian Weed Management, c/- NT Department of Primary Industries & Fisheries, GPO Box 3000, Darwin, NT 0801 9 Victorian Institute for Dryland Agriculture, NRE & CRC for Australian Weed Management, Private Bag 260, Horsham, Vic. 3401 10 Department of Agriculture Western Australia & CRC for Australian Weed Management, Locked Bag No. 4, Bentley, WA 6983 11 Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, GPO Box 1164, Hobart, Tas. -
The Naturalized Vascular Plants of Western Australia 1
12 Plant Protection Quarterly Vol.19(1) 2004 Distribution in IBRA Regions Western Australia is divided into 26 The naturalized vascular plants of Western Australia natural regions (Figure 1) that are used for 1: Checklist, environmental weeds and distribution in bioregional planning. Weeds are unevenly distributed in these regions, generally IBRA regions those with the greatest amount of land disturbance and population have the high- Greg Keighery and Vanda Longman, Department of Conservation and Land est number of weeds (Table 4). For exam- Management, WA Wildlife Research Centre, PO Box 51, Wanneroo, Western ple in the tropical Kimberley, VB, which Australia 6946, Australia. contains the Ord irrigation area, the major cropping area, has the greatest number of weeds. However, the ‘weediest regions’ are the Swan Coastal Plain (801) and the Abstract naturalized, but are no longer considered adjacent Jarrah Forest (705) which contain There are 1233 naturalized vascular plant naturalized and those taxa recorded as the capital Perth, several other large towns taxa recorded for Western Australia, com- garden escapes. and most of the intensive horticulture of posed of 12 Ferns, 15 Gymnosperms, 345 A second paper will rank the impor- the State. Monocotyledons and 861 Dicotyledons. tance of environmental weeds in each Most of the desert has low numbers of Of these, 677 taxa (55%) are environmen- IBRA region. weeds, ranging from five recorded for the tal weeds, recorded from natural bush- Gibson Desert to 135 for the Carnarvon land areas. Another 94 taxa are listed as Results (containing the horticultural centre of semi-naturalized garden escapes. Most Total naturalized flora Carnarvon). -
Using the Checklist N W C
Using the checklist • The arrangement of the checklist is alphabetical by family followed by genus, grouped under Pteridophyta, Gymnosperms, Monocotyledons and Dicotyledons. • All species and synonyms are arranged alphabetically under genus. • Accepted names are in bold print while synonyms or previously-used names are in italics. • In the case of synonyms, the currently used name follows the equals sign (=), and only refers to usage in Zimbabwe. • Distribution information is included under the current name. • The letters N, W, C, E, and S, following each listed taxon, indicate the known distribution of species within Zimbabwe as reflected by specimens in SRGH or cited in the literature. Where the distribution is unknown, we have inserted Distr.? after the taxon name. • All species known or suspected to be fully naturalised in Zimbabwe are included in the list. They are preceded by an asterisk (*). Species only known from planted or garden specimens were not included. Mozambique Zambia Kariba Mt. Darwin Lake Kariba N Victoria Falls Harare C Nyanga Mts. W Mutare Gweru E Bulawayo GREAT DYKEMasvingo Plumtree S Chimanimani Mts. Botswana N Beit Bridge South Africa The floristic regions of Zimbabwe: Central, East, North, South, West. A checklist of Zimbabwean vascular plants A checklist of Zimbabwean vascular plants edited by Anthony Mapaura & Jonathan Timberlake Southern African Botanical Diversity Network Report No. 33 • 2004 • Recommended citation format MAPAURA, A. & TIMBERLAKE, J. (eds). 2004. A checklist of Zimbabwean vascular plants. -
A New Subtribal Classification of the Tribe Anthemideae (Compositae)
Willdenowia 37 – 2007 89 CHRISTOPH OBERPRIELER, SVEN HIMMELREICH & ROBERT VOGT A new subtribal classification of the tribe Anthemideae (Compositae) Abstract Oberprieler, C., Himmelreich, S. & Vogt, R.: A new subtribal classification of the tribe Anthemideae (Compositae). – Willdenowia 37: 89-114. – ISSN 0511-9618; © 2007 BGBM Berlin-Dahlem. doi:10.3372/wi.37.37104 (available via http://dx.doi.org/) A new subtribal classification of the Compositae-Anthemideae is presented based on phylogenetic re- constructions for sequence information of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the nuclear ri- bosomal DNA (nrDNA) for 103 of the 111 accepted genera of the tribe. Results of the present analyses are compared with results from phylogenetic analyses based on cpDNA ndhF sequence variation and discussed in conjunction with morphological, anatomical, cytological, embryological and phytoche- mical evidence. As a result, 14 subtribes are circumscribed and described in detail, with information provided concerning the generic members and the geographical distribution of these entities. Four subtribes (i.e. Osmitopsidinae, Phymasperminae, Pentziinae and Leucanthemopsidinae) are described as new to science, for a further subtribe a new name (Glebionidinae, replacing the illegitimate Chry- santheminae) is validated. Key words: Asteraceae, nrDNA ITS, phylogeny, taxonomy. Introduction According to the most recent generic conspectus of Compositae tribe Anthemideae (Oberprieler & al. 2006), that tribe consists of 111 genera and c. 1800 species. Main -
A Taxonomic Revision of Hymenolepis (Asteraceae, Anthemideae)
South African Journal of Botany 91 (2014) 126–141 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect South African Journal of Botany journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/sajb A taxonomic revision of Hymenolepis (Asteraceae, Anthemideae) S.L. Magoswana a,A.R.Mageea,b,⁎ a Compton Herbarium, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X7, Claremont 7735, Cape Town, South Africa b Department of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park 2006, Johannesburg, South Africa article info abstract Article history: The South African genus Hymenolepis (Asteraceae, Anthemideae) is revised. Eight species are recognized, includ- Received 24 October 2013 ing the new species, Hymenolepis calva Magoswana & Magee. The species differ in their habit, leaf division, Received in revised form 2 January 2014 synflorescence structure, capitula shape, vestiture of the involucral bracts, and presence or absence of a pappus. Accepted 5 January 2014 A comprehensive taxonomic treatment is presented, including a key to the species, complete nomenclature and Available online 1 February 2014 typification, descriptions, illustrations and geographical distributions. Edited by JC Manning © 2014 SAAB. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Athanasiinae Greater Cape Floristic Region New species South Africa Taxonomy 1. Introduction Kammanassie Mountains, was brought to our attention by Vlok and Schutte-Vlok (2010). After further fieldwork in 2011 and studies of The species of Hymenolepis Cass. are shrubs or shrublets endemic to the available herbarium material, several characters distinguishing it South Africa, especially the Greater Cape Floristic Region, where they from its sister species, H. gnidioides, were identified. Additional herbar- typically favour high altitudes. -
Invasive Plants and Weeds of the National Forests and Grasslands in the Southwestern Region
United States Department of Agriculture Invasive Plants Forest and Weeds of the Service Southwestern National Forests Region MR-R3-16-6 and Grasslands in December 2013 the Southwestern Region Second Edition Cover Image: Tall morning-glory (Ipomoea purpurea (L.) Roth) USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database/USDA NRCS. “Wetland Flora: Field Office Illustrated Guide to Plant Species.” USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Printed on recycled paper • December 2013 Invasive Plants and Weeds of the National Forests and Grasslands of the Southwestern Region Second Edition Compiled and Edited by Mitchel R. White, Ph.D. Ecologist USDA Forest Service Southwestern Region Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests To solve a problem, we must first understand the problem. This field guide is designed to help identify the invasive plants that threaten our forests and grasslands. -
Phylogenetic Relationships and Evolutionary History of the Southern Hemisphere Genus Leptinella Cass
Phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary history of the southern hemisphere genus Leptinella Cass. (Compositae, Anthemideae) Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät III - Biologie und Vorklinische Medizin der Universität Regensburg vorgelegt von Sven Himmelreich aus Regensburg Regensburg, Juli 2009 Promotionsgesuch eingereicht am: 29.07.2009 Die Arbeit wurde angeleitet von: Prof. Dr. Christoph Oberprieler Prüfungsausschuss: Prüfungsausschussvorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Reinhard Wirth 1. Prüfer: Prof. Dr. Christoph Oberprieler 2. Prüfer: Prof. Dr. Günther Rudolf Heubl 3. Prüfer: Prof. Dr. Erhard Strohm Contents I Contents List of Figures II List of Tables III Acknowledgements IV Chapter 1 General Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Phylogeny of southern hemisphere Compositae-Anthemideae based 21 on nrDNA ITS and cpDNA ndhF sequence information Chapter 3 Phylogeny of Leptinella (Anthemideae, Compositae) inferred from 46 sequence information Chapter 4 Phylogenetic relationships in Leptinella (Anthemideae, 78 Compositae) inferred from AFLP fingerprinting Chapter 5 Evolution of dimorphic sex expression and polyploidy in Leptinella 107 Chapter 6 Conclusion 117 Summary 125 Zusammenfassung 128 References 131 Appendices 147 List of Figures II List of Figures Title Leptinella featherstonii on the Chatham Islands with Northern Royal Albatross (photo by P. de Lange, New Zealand). Fig. 1-1 Distribution of Leptinella based on Lloyd (1972c). 8 Fig. 1-2 Variation of plants in Leptinella. 9 Fig. 1-3 Capitula and florets of Leptinella. 9 Fig. 1-4 Leaves from different Leptinella taxa from cultivated plants. 10 Fig. 1-5 Postulate steps of the evolution of breeding systems in Leptinella 16 (modified from Lloyd 1975b). Fig. 2-1 Strict consensus tree of 493.976 equally most parsimonious trees 32 based on cpDNA ndhF sequence information. -
Environmental Assessment
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service June 2007 Environmental Assessment Integrated Treatment of Noxious or Invasive Plants Tonto National Forest Gila, Maricopa, Pinal and Yavapai Counties, Arizona For Information Contact: Patti Fenner, Invasive Plant Program Manager Tonto National Forest Supervisor’s Office 2324 E. McDowell Road Phoenix, AZ 85006 602-225-5200 www.fs.fed.us/r3/tonto/ The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individuals income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Environmental Assessment [Project Title] DRAFT TEMPLATE Table of Contents Summary i Introduction 2 Document Structure 2 Background 2 Purpose and Need for Action 4 Consistency with Forest Plan Goals and Objectives 9 Consistency