Leuzea Repens, a New Combination (Compositae: Cardueae: Centaureinae)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
KEW BULLETIN (2019) 74: 20 ISSN: 0075-5974 (print) DOI 10.1007/S12225-019-9809-2 ISSN: 1874-933X (electronic) Leuzea repens, a new combination (Compositae: Cardueae: Centaureinae) D. J. Nicholas Hind1 Summary. The taxonomic concepts and nomenclatural issues surrounding a group of taxa, often placed into ‘Rhaponticum Vaill.’ sensu auct. mult., are discussed. Taxonomically, taxa belonging to Acroptilon, Leuzea, Stemmac- antha and ‘Rhaponticum Vaill.’, are now considered congeneric. ‘Rhaponticum Vaill.’ is not considered a validly published generic name and taxa are now recognised under the generic name Leuzea, which has priority. The taxonomic position of Acroptilon repens (Compositae: Cardueae: Centaureinae), the only representative of the genus in Iraq, has been reviewed and a new combination in Leuzea is provided, together with an exhaustive synonymy of the taxon concerned. Key Words. Asteraceae, Chewing Disease, Flora of Iraq. Introduction the synonymy of the latter; two literature references During the initial editing of the draft Flora of Iraq were provided, the first to Holub (1973) and, the Compositae account, written by several authors some second, to Dittrich (1984). 35 or more years ago, the present author was faced Holub (1973) had long-recognised that within the with updating much taxonomy and sorting out many Centaureinae there were taxonomic issues with both nomenclatural issues with the various scripts. One of Rhaponticum sensu auct. and Leuzea, and that the work these concerned Francis Davies’s original draft ac- of Soskov (1959) and Dittrich (1968a, b) had scarcely countofthegenusAcroptilon Cass. (Compositae: resolved them, together with the clear nomenclatural Cardueae: Centaureinae), and the sole species in the issues that still existed. Holub concluded that Leuzea Flora, A. repens (L.) DC. (based on L. conifera (L.) DC.) was congeneric with Acroptilon repens is a widely distributed taxon, and a Cestrinus Cass., Stemmacantha, Fornicium Cass. and noxious weed, possibly best known as the Russian Malacophyllum Tausch along with several species be- knapweed (Maddox et al. 1985;Moore1972; longing to Rhaponticum sensu auct., synonymising all, Quattrocchi 2000: 38; USDA 2015; also known as reducing the genera to subgenera of Leuzea and creeping knapweed, hardheads, and Turkestan thistle providing many new combinations. In his discussions — Klein 2011). Its toxicity is reported as causing on the nomenclature, he highlighted and summarised Chewing Disease (nigropallidal encephalomalacia), a the many issues with the generic name Rhaponticum, neurological disorder in horses, a response also seen concluding that it should only be ascribed to Ludwig, to be caused by Centaurea solstitialis L. in the same and now considered synonymous with Centaurea L.; subtribe (Anon 2015; Vetstream 2014). the present author concurs with this view. Holub did It became apparent to the present author that the not treat Acroptilon repens within his ‘Contribution’, generic placement of Acroptilon was questionable, and mentioning only the common basic chromosome brought with it nomenclatural implications. Further number of x= 13 amongst several genera within the study indicated that Acroptilon repens belonged to what Centaureinae, including Acroptilon. Susanna & Garcia-Jacas (2006) had termed the ‘III.5.B. The taxonomy of Holub’s and Dittrich’s (Dittrich Rhaponticum Group’, that in turn formed part of the 1968a, 1975, 1984) concepts of this group of species subtribe Centaureinae. This group, of perhaps some was subjected to analysis (of one plastid and two 40 species, included the genera Acroptilon, Leuzea DC., nuclear marker/s) in an attempt to resolve the ‘Rhaponticum Vaill.’ and Stemmacantha Cass. (Susanna delimitation of the ‘Rhaponticum group’ (Hidalgo & Garcia-Jacas 2006: 142 – 144; Hidalgo et al. 2006). et al. 2006). Hidalgo et al. provided a ‘DNA phylogeny Earlier, in his treatment of the subtribe Centaureinae, of Rhaponticum and related genera’ from which a quite Bremer (1994: 149 – 156) recognised a monospecific reasonable taxonomic resolution was presented. The Acroptilon (A. repens) and Stemmacantha (containing ‘Rhaponticum group’ was clearly comprised of the about 20 species); ‘Rhaponticum Hill’ was placed into concepts of Acroptilon, Leuzea and ‘Rhaponticum Vaill.’ Accepted for publication 8 April 2019. Published online 18 May 2019 1 Herbarium, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, UK. e-mail: [email protected] © The Author(s), 2019 20 Page 2 of 5 KEW BULLETIN (2019) 74: 20 (≡ Stemmacantha) and usefully divided into two clades subsequently redetermined as Rhaponticum repens that Hidalgo et al. informally recognised as the (L.) Hidalgo by Martins (Mai 2009); B-W(16601-02 ‘Oriental clade’ and the ‘Occidental clade’; it was in 0) is marked ‘C. Picris 2’ on the top right hand the former that A. repens (and A. australe Iljin) was corner of the sheet, and has a small label at the placed. Furthermore, since the authors could not bottom of the sheet —‘Cent. Picris Pall./(W.)’ The entirely resolve the relationship between A. repens sheet bears an annotation label by Cronquist (1989) and A. australe they merely provided a new combina- suggesting this is ‘presumably the type of Centaurea tion of the former under Rhaponticum. The implica- picris Pallas ex Will. = C. repens L.’. On neither the tions surrounding A. australe are discussed below. first or second sheets are there any lower leaves Ascription of the authorship of Rhaponticum to with anything but entire basal margins. The third Vaillant (e.g. Greuter 2003; Greuter et al. 2005; Zhu sheet, B-W(16601-03 0), is annotated ‘C. Picris 3’ on & Martins 2011) fails to recognise the issue with the top right hand corner of the sheet. It is labelled Vaillant’s many names (see Brummitt 2008; Greuter as ‘Centaurea pycris Pall./(Adams)’. This sheet bears 2008; Greuter & McNeill 2008;Hindet al. 2007; some lower leaves that are ‘subdentatis’, as indicat- Susanna 2009). This can be summarised by essentially ed in the protologue, but the leaves in general are discounting a post-Linnaean translation (i.e. post-1753 much narrower than on the other two sheets. The —‘Vaillant’ 1754) (of a pre-Linnaean work of Vaillant, material from BM is clearly ex Herb. Pallas, with the dating from 1719) that many authors considered top left hand label indicating the locality as provided validation of Vaillant’s names. Holub (1973) ‘Caspica’, and it is quite clear that the basal margins had correctly recognised that Leuzea had priority and of many leaves are ‘subdentatis’, although more made many of the required combinations — apart frequently conspicuously toothed to lobed. Since from considering A. repens. Since Hidalgo et al. (2006: the Pallas herbarium was sold in 1808, and part 709, 711) clearly placed Acroptilon within the concept purchased by Lambert and deposited in BM (Miller of Rhaponticum, here recognised as Leuzea, a new 1970 — Pallas material was discussed at length and combination is required This is provided below. was sold in the auction of Lambert’s herbarium in three lots, #94, #96 and #285.), it is highly probable that Willdenow had seen the material in Pallas’s New combination herbarium in preparing his Species Plantarum Following the new combination, a fairly exhaustive (Willdenow 1803); the BM material should there- synonymy of the taxon is provided. After the citation fore not be discounted if lectotypification of the of each name and its place of publication, the ‘type name is considered necessary. citation’ in a traditional sense is provided (as a direct Serratula picris (Pall. ex Willd.) M.Bieb. (Marschall von quote from the protologue, regardless of whether a Bieberstein Dec. 1819 or early 1820: 546). specimen was cited). The location of type material is Acroptilon obtusifolium Cass. (Cassini 1827: 465). Type: cited, where known and, when available, the barcode ‘Nous avons fait cette description sur un échantillon numbers present with the material given. Many of the sec de l’herbier de M. Desfontaines, étiqueté digital images of the ‘types’ can be seen through JStor Centaurea picris, ...’ Holotype: ?P or FI. Global Plants (JSTOR-GP continuously updated), Acroptilon subdentatum Cass. (Cassini 1827: 465). Type: institutional subscriptions permitting. see citation for A. serratum. Holotype: ?P. Acroptilon serratum Cass. (Cassini 1827: 466). Type: ‘Nous avos décrit cette espèce et la précédente Leuzea repens (L.) D.J.N.Hind, comb. nov. [=Acroptilon subdentatum] sur des échantillons secs, innommés, dont nous ignorons l’origine.’ Holotype: http://www.ipni.org/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:60478474-2 ?P. Acroptilon angustifolium Cass. (Cassini 1827: 466). Type: Centaurea repens L., Sp. Pl., ed. 2. 2: 1293 (Linnaeus ‘Nous avons faite cette description sur un 1763). Type: ‘Habitat in oriente.’,LINN-LH échantillon sec qui appartient problement à la 1030.34. Centaurea repens de Linné.’ Holotype: ?P. Centaurea picris Pall. ex Willd. (Willdenow 1803: 2302). Carduus picris (Pall. ex Willd.) Sweet (1830: 281). Type: ‘Habitat ad mare Caspium. (v. s.)’. Type Acroptilon picris (Pall. ex Willd.) C.A.Mey. (Meyer 1831: material: B-W(16601-01 0, 16601-02 0, 16601-03 0), 67). BM(000996201). Note: Of the material in B-W none Acroptilon picris (Pall. ex Willd.) DC. (de Candolle indicate the locality — B-W(16601-01 0) is marked 1838: 662), comb. superfl. ‘C. Picris 1.’ on the top right hand corner of the Acroptilon picris (Pall. ex Willd.) C.A.Mey. var. α sheet, and was most probably determined by obtusifolia (Cass.) DC. (de Candolle 1838: 662). Marschall von Bieberstein as ‘Serratula picris MB’ Acroptilon picris (Pall. ex Willd.) C.A.Mey. var. β on a label to the lower left of the specimen, and angustifolia (Cass.) DC. (de Candolle 1838: 662). © The Author(s), 2019 KEW BULLETIN (2019) 74: 20 Page 3 of 5 20 Acroptilon picris (Pall. ex Willd.) C.A.Mey. var. γ istan), W Mongolia, China (Sinkiang), W Siberia. subdentata (Cass.) DC. (de Candolle 1838: 662). Introduced and widespread as a noxious weed in the Acroptilon picris (Pall. ex Willd.) C.A.Mey.