DOCSLIB.ORG

Long-Term Strategy for Russian Olive and Saltcedar Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Long-Term Strategy for Russian Olive and Saltcedar Management LONG-TERM STRATEGY FOR RUSSIAN OLIVE AND SALTCEDAR MANAGEMENT YELLOWSTONE RIVER CONSERVATION DISTRICT COUNCIL Prepared by Thomas L. Pick, Bozeman, Montana May 1, 2013 Cover photo credit: Tom Pick. Left side: Plains cottonwood seedlings on bar following 2011 runoff. Top: Saltcedar and Russian olive infest the shoreline of the Yellowstone River between Hysham and Forsyth, Montana. Bottom: A healthy narrowleaf cottonwood (Populus angustifolia James) stand adjacent to the channel provides benefits for wildlife and livestock in addition to bank stability and storing floodwater for later release. Table of Contents page number Agreement ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….1 Executive Summary …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….2 Long-Term Strategy for Russian Olive and Saltcedar Management 1.0 Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………4 1.1 Biology and Ecology of Russian Olive and Saltcedar ……………………………………………………5 1.12 Russian Olive 1.13 Saltcedar 1.2 Distribution and Spread……………………………………………………………………………………………..6 1.3 Summary of Impacts ………………………………………………………………………………………………….6 1.4 Legal Framework ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….7 2.0 Strategic Management Objective and Goals ………………………………………………………………..…..8 2.1 Goal 1: Prevent New Infestations (Control Spread) …………………………………….……….……8 2.2 Goal 2: Eradicate All Infestations Within the River Corridor ………………………………………9 2.3 Goal 3: Manage Populations Outside of the River Corridor ……………………………………….9 3.0 Treatment Strategies and Priorities …………………………………….……………………………………………9 3.1 Priority 1 - Uninfested Sites and Headwaters Areas ………………………………………………..10 3.2 Priority 2 – Riparian/Floodplain Sites with Light Infestation ……………………………………10 3.3 Priority 3 – Areas of Special Concern ………………………………………………………………………10 3.4 Priority 4 - Densely Infested Sites ……………………………………………………………………………11 3.5 Priority 5 – Uplands and Tributaries Adjacent to the River Corridor ……………………….11 4.0 Management Techniques and Costs ………………………………………………………………………………11 4.1 Lightly Infested Areas and Areas of Special Concern ……………………………………………….11 4.11 Manual (Hand Tool) Removal ………………………………………………………………………….12 4.12 Selective Mechanical Grubbing ……………………………………………………………………….12 4.13 Low Volume Basal Bark Herbicide Application ………………………………………………..12 4.14 Cut Stump Herbicide Application ……………………………………………………………………12 4.15 Foliar Herbicide Application ……………………………………………………………………………12 4.2 Densely Infested Sites ……………………………………………………………………………………………………13 4.21 Mechanical Removal ………………………………………………………………………………………13 4.22 Aerial Herbicide Application ……………………………………………………………………………13 4.23 Combination of Control Methods ……………………………..……………………………………13 4.24 Site Restoration Best Management Practices (BMPs) …………………………………….14 5.0 Inventory Needs and Methods ………………………………………………………………………………………16 5.1 Remote Sensing Interpretation ……………………………………………………………………………….16 5.2 Predictive Models for Potential Expansion of Distribution ……………….…………………….17 5.3 Invasive Species Mapping Efforts ………………………………………………..………………………….17 6.0 Public Education and Communication Activities …………………………………………………………..18 6.1 Public Meetings and Outreach ………………………………………………………………………………..18 6.2 Russian Olive Video …………………………………………………………………………………………………18 6.3 Demonstration Projects ………………………..………………………………………………………………..18 6.4 Field Days and Tours ……………………………………………………………………………………………….18 6.5 School Outreach Activities ………………………………………………………………………………………18 6.6 Academic and Technology Research Needs …………………………………………………………….19 6.61 Agricultural Research Service- Fort Keogh and Sidney Exp. Stations ………………..19 6.62 Bridger Plant Materials Center …………………………………………………………………………19 7.0 Monitoring Objectives and Techniques ………………………………………………………………………..19 7.1 Photo Point ………………………………………………………………………..…………………………………..20 7.2 Observation ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………20 7.3 Plot …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………20 7.4 Transect ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….20 7.5 Qualitative ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………21 8.0 Collaborative Efforts ……………………………..………………………………………………………………………21 8.1 Soil and Water Conservation Districts …………………..…………………………………………………21 8.2 Missouri River Watershed Coalition ………………………………………………………………………..21 8.3 Center for Invasive Species Management ……………………………………………………………….22 8.4 Montana and North Dakota Noxious Weed Program …………………..…………………………22 8.5 County Weed Control Districts ………………………………………………………………………………..23 8.6 Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks ……………………………………………………………………………….23 8.7 USDA – Natural Resources Conservation Service …………………………………………………..23 8.8 Montana State University Ag Extension Program …………………………………………………….24 8.9 Zero Spread Noxious Weed Awareness Campaign …………………………………………………..24 9.0 Additional Sources of Information ………………………………………………………………………………..24 10.0 References ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….26 11.0 Appendices ……………………………………………………………………………………….……………………..…29 Appendix A. Invasive Species Reference Guide-Russian Olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia L. )… 30 Appendix B. Invasive Species Reference Guide – Saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) ……………….…….. 32 Appendix C. NRCS 2008 Russian Olive Distribution Map ……………………………………….…………..34 Appendix D. Approximate Yellowstone Saltcedar Distribution Map ……………………………..….35 Appendix E. Montana Noxious Weed List……………………………………………………………………………36 Appendix F. North Dakota Noxious Weed List …………………………………………………………………..37 Appendix G. Herbicide Manufacturer Product Guides …………………………..…………………………..38 Appendix H. Suggested Invasive Species Control Monitoring Record …………………………………39 Agreement The Yellowstone River Conservation District Council (YRCDC) adopts this long-term plan and the goals and objectives identified herein as their guide to Russian olive and saltcedar management efforts. Using an adaptive approach, the plan will be revised as technology and objectives change over time. Endorsement of this plan by any partners or agencies named within this plan in no way limits any partners’ or agencies existing legal authority, mandate, or responsibility and is subject to available funds and human resources. ____________________________________ ____________________ Chairperson, YRCDC Board of Directors Date ____________________________________ ____________________ Chairperson Resource Advisory Council (RAC) Date 1 Executive Summary The Yellowstone River Conservation District Council (YRCDC) was organized in 1999 to study a broad range of issues associated with the sustainability of the Yellowstone River system in Montana and North Dakota. The riparian studies conducted as part of the effort indicated that Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia L.) and saltcedar (Tamarix ramosissima and T. chinensis and their hybrids) invasion comprise serious threats to the integrity and function of riparian and floodplain areas along the Yellowstone River. Both of these invasive species have characteristics that promote spread far beyond their current distribution and create numerous negative impacts on river function, native plant and wildlife species population dynamics, wildlife habitat, and water quality and quantity. The YRCDC adopted Best Management Practice #1, Managing Russian Olive in the Yellowstone River Valley, in 2007 to address this issue. This document serves as a strategic plan to carry out a coordinated and comprehensive management effort throughout the length of the Yellowstone River in Montana and North Dakota. Russian olive is classified as a Priority 3 “regulated plant” in Montana, while it is not classified at all in North Dakota. Saltcedar is classified as a Priority 2B Noxious weed in both states. The YRCDC’s management objectives will be based on the following goals: Goal 1 – Prevent New Infestations. Goal 2 – Eradication of All Infestations within the River Corridor. Goal 3 – Manage Populations Outside of the River Corridor. To achieve these goals, YRCDC will utilize the following strategies and priorities in treatment: Prevention is the most effective and efficient strategy. Uninfested sites and headwaters areas will have top priority for treatment and maintenance. Riparian and floodplain areas with light infestations will have second priority to prevent expansion and reinfestation following treatment. Areas of special concern will be identified and treatment plans developed to protect their inherent values and features. Densely infested areas will be treated to remove monotypic stands and meet landowner objectives using appropriate restoration techniques and practices. Uplands and tributaries adjacent to the river corridor will be identified and treated to remove Russian olive and saltcedar populations that threaten reinfestation of the Yellowstone River corridor. Alternatives to existing upland plantings of Russian olive seed sources will be promoted while control of all saltcedar populations will be sought. Recommended management techniques are dependent owner objective, density of infestation, and site conditions. An array of proven management techniques are available and are described in the plan for utilization in carrying out this strategy. Early detection and management of Russian olive and saltcedar free areas is the preferred and most cost effective strategy, where possible. References for specific herbicide products and treatment rates are provided. An adaptive, integrated pest management approach is 2 recommended. Some sites will require a combination of mechanical and herbicide treatment for full success. Heavy infestations will likely require restoration
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Overcoming the Challenges of Tamarix Management with Diorhabda Carinulata Through the Identification and Application of Semioche
    OVERCOMING THE CHALLENGES OF TAMARIX MANAGEMENT WITH DIORHABDA CARINULATA THROUGH THE IDENTIFICATION AND APPLICATION OF SEMIOCHEMICALS by Alexander Michael Gaffke A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ecology and Environmental Sciences MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana May 2018 ©COPYRIGHT by Alexander Michael Gaffke 2018 All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project would not have been possible without the unconditional support of my family, Mike, Shelly, and Tony Gaffke. I must thank Dr. Roxie Sporleder for opening my world to the joy of reading. Thanks must also be shared with Dr. Allard Cossé, Dr. Robert Bartelt, Dr. Bruce Zilkowshi, Dr. Richard Petroski, Dr. C. Jack Deloach, Dr. Tom Dudley, and Dr. Dan Bean whose previous work with Tamarix and Diorhabda carinulata set the foundations for this research. I must express my sincerest gratitude to my Advisor Dr. David Weaver, and my committee: Dr. Sharlene Sing, Dr. Bob Peterson and Dr. Dan Bean for their guidance throughout this project. To Megan Hofland and Norma Irish, thanks for keeping me sane. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................1 Tamarix ............................................................................................................................1 Taxonomy ................................................................................................................1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • SEED IDENTIFICATION LIST - Sort by Family
    SEED IDENTIFICATION LIST - Sort by Family Family Scientific Name Common Names Aizoaceae Tetragonia tetragonoides New Zealand spinach Amaranthaceae Amaranthus albus tumble pigweed Amaryllidaceae Allium cepa onion Amaryllidaceae Allium porrum leek Amaryllidaceae Allium schoenoprasum chives Amaryllidaceae Allium vineale wild garlic Apiaceae Anethum graveolens dill Apiaceae Apium graveolens celery, celeriac Apiaceae Carum carvi caraway; wild caraway Apiaceae Conium maculatum poison hemlock Apiaceae Coriandrum sativum coriander Apiaceae Daucus carota carrot; Queen Ane's lace; wild carrot Apiaceae Pastinaca sativa parsnip; wild parsnip Apiaceae Petroselinum crispum parsley Apocynaceae Asclepias syriaca common milkweed Asparagaceae Asparagus officinalis asparagus Asteraceae Achillea millefolium common yarrow, woolly yarrow Asteraceae Ambrosia artemisiifolia common ragweed Asteraceae Ambrosia trifida giant ragweed Asteraceae Anthemis arvensis field chamomile Asteraceae Anthemis cotula dogfennel, mayweed Asteraceae Arctium lappa great burdock Asteraceae Carduus nutans musk thistle, nodding thistle Asteraceae Carthamus tinctorius safflower Asteraceae Centaurea cyanus cornflower, bachelor's button, ragged robin Asteraceae Centaurea solstitialis yellow starthistle Asteraceae Cichorium endivia endive Asteraceae Cirsium arvense Canada thistle Asteraceae Cirsium vulgare bull thistle Asteraceae Crepis capillaris smooth hawksbeard Asteraceae Cynara cardunculus artichoke, cardoon, artichoke thistle Asteraceae Helianthus annuus (all types, cultivated and
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Flower Mite Aceria Acroptiloni on the Invasive Plant
    BioControl (2014) 59:367–375 DOI 10.1007/s10526-014-9573-z The impact of the flower mite Aceria acroptiloni on the invasive plant Russian knapweed, Rhaponticum repens, in its native range Ghorbanali Asadi • Reza Ghorbani • Massimo Cristofaro • Philipp Chetverikov • Radmila Petanovic´ • Biljana Vidovic´ • Urs Schaffner Received: 26 October 2013 / Accepted: 13 March 2014 / Published online: 27 March 2014 Ó International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC) 2014 Abstract Rhaponticum repens (L.) Hidalgo is a clonal field site revealed that A. acroptiloni was by far the Asteraceae plant native to Asia and highly invasive in dominant mite species. We conclude that the mite A. North America. We conducted open-field experiments in acroptiloni is a promising biological control candidate Iran to assess the impact of the biological control inflicting significant impact on the above-ground biomass candidate, Aceria acroptiloni Shevchenko & Kovalev and reproductive output of the invasive plant R. repens. (Acari, Eriophyidae), on the target weed. Using three different experimental approaches, we found that mite Keywords Above-ground biomass Á Acari Á attack reduced the biomass of R. repens shoots by Acroptilon Á Asteraceae Á Classical biological 40–75 %. Except for the initial year of artificial infesta- control Á Pre-release studies Á Seed production tion by A. acroptiloni of R. repens shoots, the number of seed heads was reduced by 60–80 % and the number of seeds by 95–98 %. Morphological investigations of the Introduction mite complex attacking R. repens at the experimental The aim of pre-release studies in classical biological weed control projects is not only to experimentally Handling editor: John Scott.
    [Show full text]
  • ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 7Th Edition
    ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names th 7 Edition ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. M. Schori Published by All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be The Internation Seed Testing Association (ISTA) reproduced, stored in any retrieval system or transmitted Zürichstr. 50, CH-8303 Bassersdorf, Switzerland in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior ©2020 International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) permission in writing from ISTA. ISBN 978-3-906549-77-4 ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 1st Edition 1966 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Prof P. A. Linehan 2nd Edition 1983 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. H. Pirson 3rd Edition 1988 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. W. A. Brandenburg 4th Edition 2001 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 5th Edition 2007 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 6th Edition 2013 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 7th Edition 2019 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. M. Schori 2 7th Edition ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names Content Preface .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Symbols and Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alien Plant Species in the Agricultural Habitats of Ukraine: Diversity and Risk Assessment
    Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 37, No. 1, p. 24–31, 2018 DOI:10.2478/eko-2018-0003 ALIEN PLANT SPECIES IN THE AGRICULTURAL HABITATS OF UKRAINE: DIVERSITY AND RISK ASSESSMENT RAISA BURDA Institute for Evolutionary Ecology, NAS of Ukraine, 37, Lebedeva Str., 03143 Kyiv, Ukraine; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Burda R.: Alien plant species in the agricultural habitats of Ukraine: diversity and risk assessment. Ekológia (Bratislava), Vol. 37, No. 1, p. 24–31, 2018. This paper is the first critical review of the diversity of the Ukrainian adventive flora, which has spread in agricultural habitats in the 21st century. The author’s annotated checklist con- tains the data on 740 species, subspecies and hybrids from 362 genera and 79 families of non-native weeds. The floristic comparative method was used, and the information was gen- eralised into some categories of five characteristic features: climamorphotype (life form), time and method of introduction, level of naturalisation, and distribution into 22 classes of three habitat types according to European Nature Information System (EUNIS). Two assess- ments of the ecological risk of alien plants were first conducted in Ukraine according to the European methods: the risk of overcoming natural migration barriers and the risk of their impact on the environment. The exposed impact of invasive alien plants on ecosystems has a convertible character; the obtained information confirms a high level of phytobiotic contami- nation of agricultural habitats in Ukraine. It is necessary to implement European and national documents regarding the legislative and regulative policy on invasive alien species as one of the threats to biotic diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear and Plastid DNA Phylogeny of the Tribe Cardueae (Compositae
    1 Nuclear and plastid DNA phylogeny of the tribe Cardueae 2 (Compositae) with Hyb-Seq data: A new subtribal classification and a 3 temporal framework for the origin of the tribe and the subtribes 4 5 Sonia Herrando-Morairaa,*, Juan Antonio Callejab, Mercè Galbany-Casalsb, Núria Garcia-Jacasa, Jian- 6 Quan Liuc, Javier López-Alvaradob, Jordi López-Pujola, Jennifer R. Mandeld, Noemí Montes-Morenoa, 7 Cristina Roquetb,e, Llorenç Sáezb, Alexander Sennikovf, Alfonso Susannaa, Roser Vilatersanaa 8 9 a Botanic Institute of Barcelona (IBB, CSIC-ICUB), Pg. del Migdia, s.n., 08038 Barcelona, Spain 10 b Systematics and Evolution of Vascular Plants (UAB) – Associated Unit to CSIC, Departament de 11 Biologia Animal, Biologia Vegetal i Ecologia, Facultat de Biociències, Universitat Autònoma de 12 Barcelona, ES-08193 Bellaterra, Spain 13 c Key Laboratory for Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, 14 Chengdu, China 15 d Department of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA 16 e Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA (Laboratoire d’Ecologie Alpine), FR- 17 38000 Grenoble, France 18 f Botanical Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History, PO Box 7, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, 19 Finland; and Herbarium, Komarov Botanical Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Prof. Popov str. 20 2, 197376 St. Petersburg, Russia 21 22 *Corresponding author at: Botanic Institute of Barcelona (IBB, CSIC-ICUB), Pg. del Migdia, s. n., ES- 23 08038 Barcelona, Spain. E-mail address: [email protected] (S. Herrando-Moraira). 24 25 Abstract 26 Classification of the tribe Cardueae in natural subtribes has always been a challenge due to the lack of 27 support of some critical branches in previous phylogenies based on traditional Sanger markers.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Knapweeds
    Biology, Ecology and Management of Montana Knapweeds EB0204 revised August 2017 Celestine Duncan, Consultant, Weed Management Services, Helena, MT Jim Story, Research Professor, retired, MSU Western Ag Research Center, Corvallis, MT Roger Sheley, former MSU Extension Weed Specialist, Bozeman, MT revised by Hilary Parkinson, former MSU Research Associate, and Jane Mangold, MSU Extension Invasive Plant Specialist Table of Contents Plant Biology . 3 SpeedyWeed ID . 5 Ecology . 4 Habitat . 4 Spread and Establishment Potential . 6 Damage Potential . 7 Origins, Current Status and Distribution . 8 Management Alternatives . 8 Prevention . 8 Mechanical Control . .9 Cultural Control . .10 Biological Control . .11 Chemical Control . .14 Integrated Weed Management (IWM) . 16 Additional Resources . 17 Acknowledgements . .19 COVER PHOTOS large - spotted knapweed by Marisa Williams, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, bugwood.org top inset - diffuse knapweed by Cindy Roche, bugwood.org bottom inset - Russain knapweed by Steve Dewey, Utah State University, bugwood.org Any mention of products in this publication does not constitute a recommendation by Montana State University Extension. It is a violation of Federal law to use herbicides in a manner inconsistent with their labeling. Copyright © 2017 MSU Extension The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Montana State University and Montana State University Extension prohibit discrimination in all of their programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital and family status. Issued in furtherance of cooperative extension work in agriculture and home economics, acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Jeff Bader, Director of Extension, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigropallidal Encephalomalacia in Horses Grazing Rhaponticum Repens
    EQUINE CASE REPORT AND CLINICAL REVIEW Nigropallidal encephalomalacia in horses grazing Rhaponticum repens (creeping knapweed)avj_879 151..154 EQUINE CRB Elliotta* and CI McCowanb treatment options for this disease. Affected horses will die of starva- Nigropallidal encephalomalacia was diagnosed in two horses in tion and dehydration if they are not euthanased. Pathology typically northern Victoria that had a history of long-term pasture access to involves bilaterally symmetrical malacia of the globus pallidus and/or a dense growth of Rhaponticum repens. The region in which the 1–7 affected horses lived had received well above average rainfall for the substantia nigra regions within the thalamus. The only previous several months preceding the poisoning. Affected horses had Australian case was documented in five Spring-drop foals and one sudden onset of subcutaneous oedema of the head, impaired pre- 9-month-old foal with signs of lethargy, inability to graze or drink and hension and mastication, dullness, lethargy and repeated chewing- paresis of the tongue with the lateral edges curling upwards to form an 8 like jaw movements. Diagnosis was confirmed at necropsy, with open tube. characteristic malacic lesions in the substantia nigra and globus The toxin causing equine NPEM remains uncertain. Tyramine and the pallidus of the brain. This is the first documented case of nigro- pallidal encephalomalacia in Australian horses associated with sesquiterpene lactone repin have both been proposed as causative 2,10 R. repens. agents. The characteristics
    [Show full text]
  • Tamarix Parviflora Global Invasive
    FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Tamarix parviflora Tamarix parviflora System: Terrestrial Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Plantae Magnoliophyta Magnoliopsida Violales Tamaricaceae Common name tamarisk (English), saltcedar (English), tamarix (English), smallflower tamarisk (English), small-flower tamarisk (English) Synonym Tamarix tetrandra , auct. non Pallas Similar species Summary The smallflower tamarisk, Tamarix parviflora DC., is a semideciduous small tree or shrub that is native to Israel, Turkey and southeastern Europe. Seedlings of T. parviflora develop readily once established, and grow woody root systems that can reach as deep as 50 m into soil and rock. It can extract salts from soil and water excrete them through their branches and leaves. T. parviflora can have the following effects on ecological systems: dry up viable water sources; increase surface soil salinity; modification of hydrology; decrease native biodiversity of plants, invertebrates, birds, fish and reptiles; and increase fire risk. Management techniques that have been used to control T. parviflora include mechanical clearing - using both machinery and by hand - and/or herbicides. view this species on IUCN Red List Notes Tamarix parviflora Is thought to hybridise with the athel pine T. aphylla. (National Athel Pine Management Committee 2008). Global Invasive Species Database (GISD) 2021. Species profile Tamarix parviflora. Pag. 1 Available from: http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=702 [Accessed 30 September 2021] FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Tamarix parviflora Management Info Management techniques that have been used to control Tamarix sp. include mechanical clearing - using both machinery and by hand - and/or herbicides. Hand-pulling is a very suitable control method when there are a few scattered seedlings, whilst other methods are more suitable for dense trees (excavation) and dense seedlings (stick raking, blade ploughing, ripping, root raking).
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrate and Floristic Inventories at Minuteman Missile National Historic Site: 2007 Status Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Vertebrate and Floristic Inventories at Minuteman Missile National Historic Site: 2007 Status Report Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NGPN/NRTR—2008/124 ` ON THE COVER Swift fox den at Minuteman Missile National Historic Site Photograph by: Rikk Flohr Vertebrate and Floristic Inventories at Minuteman Missile National Historic Site: 2007 Status Report Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NGPN/NRTR—2008/124 Marcia H. Wilson National Park Service Northern Great Plains Inventory and Monitoring Network 231 East Saint Joseph Street Rapid City, SD 57701 Robert A. Gitzen University of Missouri Northern Great Plains I&M Network 231 East Saint Joseph Street Rapid City, SD 57701 Michael Bynum National Park Service Northern Great Plains I&M Network 231 East Saint Joseph Street Rapid City, SD 57701 September 2008 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resources Technical Reports series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Quality Assessment and Monitoring of Brown Bridge Quiet Area Wetlands
    Floristic Quality Assessment and Monitoring of Brown Bridge Quiet Area Wetlands Prepared by: Phyllis J. Higman Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901-3036 For: Grand Traverse Conservation District 1450 Cass Road, Traverse City, Michigan, 49685 October 30, 2013 Report Number 2013-17 Acknowledgements This work was made possible by a Great Hyde assisted with early surveys and delivery of Lake Restoration Initiative grant through the a workshop for local stewards. Brian Klatt and Environmental Protection Agency, awarded to Glenn Palmgren provided valuable guidance on the Grand Traverse Conservation District in sampling strategies and Reb Ratliff provided Traverse City, Michigan. Many thanks to Robin enthusiastic energy to kick off the field sampling Christensen for writing the grant and for inviting and assemble necessary field gear. Thanks to us to do this work. Suzan Campbell and Daria you all. Cover photos by Phyllis J. Higman, 2012- 2013. Clockwise from left to right: Brown Bridge Pond, Brown Bridge Dam, The Boardman River Coursing through the Brown Bridge Quiet Area after Dam Removal, and Newly Exposed Bottomlands at Brown Bridge Quiet Area after Dam Removal. Copyright 2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status, or family status. Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Synthetic Investigation of Natural Products Causing Dopaminergic Neurodegeneration
    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 1-1-2018 Synthetic Investigation of Natural Products Causing Dopaminergic Neurodegeneration Michael John Cunningham University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Cunningham, Michael John, "Synthetic Investigation of Natural Products Causing Dopaminergic Neurodegeneration" (2018). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1457. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/1457 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SYNTHETIC INVESTIGATION OF NATURAL PRODUCTS CAUSING DOPAMINERGIC NEURODEGENERATION A Dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Mississippi Michael John Cunningham May 2018 Copyright © 2018 by Michael Cunningham All rights reserved ABSTRACT The terrestrial organisms Streptomyces venezuelae and Rhaponticum repens produce toxic secondary metabolites that likely function as chemical deterrents. The polyketide SV-6 from S. venezuelae and the sesquiterpene lactone repin from R. repens both produce dose- dependent and selective degeneration of dopaminergic neurons. These molecules represent two possible tools that can be used to explore chemotoxic induction of Parkinson’s disease. In the case of SV-6, a newly isolated metabolite, total synthesis was undertaken to confirm its structure and biological activity. The natural product was produced from methacrolein and Roche ester starting materials that were elaborated to their respective fragments, a vinyl iodide and a Weinreb amide.
    [Show full text]