DOCSLIB.ORG

Floristic Quality Assessment and Monitoring of Brown Bridge Quiet Area Wetlands

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Floristic Quality Assessment and Monitoring of Brown Bridge Quiet Area Wetlands Floristic Quality Assessment and Monitoring of Brown Bridge Quiet Area Wetlands Prepared by: Phyllis J. Higman Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901-3036 For: Grand Traverse Conservation District 1450 Cass Road, Traverse City, Michigan, 49685 October 30, 2013 Report Number 2013-17 Acknowledgements This work was made possible by a Great Hyde assisted with early surveys and delivery of Lake Restoration Initiative grant through the a workshop for local stewards. Brian Klatt and Environmental Protection Agency, awarded to Glenn Palmgren provided valuable guidance on the Grand Traverse Conservation District in sampling strategies and Reb Ratliff provided Traverse City, Michigan. Many thanks to Robin enthusiastic energy to kick off the field sampling Christensen for writing the grant and for inviting and assemble necessary field gear. Thanks to us to do this work. Suzan Campbell and Daria you all. Cover photos by Phyllis J. Higman, 2012- 2013. Clockwise from left to right: Brown Bridge Pond, Brown Bridge Dam, The Boardman River Coursing through the Brown Bridge Quiet Area after Dam Removal, and Newly Exposed Bottomlands at Brown Bridge Quiet Area after Dam Removal. Copyright 2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status, or family status. Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................................... i Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Methods .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Floristic Assessment.......................................................................................................................... 3 Point-line Intercept Sampling ............................................................................................................ 3 Results ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Floristic Quality Assessment ............................................................................................................. 4 Point-line Intercept Sampling ............................................................................................................ 5 Discussion ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Floristic Quality Assessment ............................................................................................................. 6 Forested Wetlands....................................................................................................................... 6 Open Wetlands ........................................................................................................................... 7 Combined Wetlands .................................................................................................................... 8 Point-line Intercept Sampling ............................................................................................................ 8 References............................................................................................................................................... 9 Appendix A. Grand Traverse Invasive Species Network Top Twenty.................................................. A-1 Appendix B. Recent Taxonomic Changes ........................................................................................... B-1 Genera in Michigan Flora whose family assignments here changed ............................................... B-3 New Species added to the website March 2013 .............................................................................. B-4 Additions and Name Changes to Michigan Flora, Volumes 1-3 ..................................................... B-5 Appendix C. Point Intercept Transect Photos ...................................................................................... C-1 Appendix D. FQA Data ...................................................................................................................... D-1 Forested Wetlands ......................................................................................................................... D-3 Open Wetlands .............................................................................................................................. D-9 Forested and Open Wetlands ....................................................................................................... D-15 Appendix E. Point-Line Intercept Sampling Data .................................................................................E-1 Figures Figure 1. Brown Bridge Dam. ................................................................................................................. 1 Figure 2. Brown Bridge Pond ................................................................................................................ .1 Figure 3. Brown Bridge Wetlands ........................................................................................................... 1 Figure 4. Location of transects. ............................................................................................................... 3 Brown Bridge Quiet Area FQA and Monitoring, 2013, Page i Tables Table 1. Invasive plant documented at Brown Bridge by GTCD prior to dam removal ........................... .2 Table 2. Comparison of Floristic Quality Data from 1992 to 2013........................................................... 4 Table 3. All non-native species documented in the Brown Bridge Wetlands during 2012-2013 .............. .5 Table 4. Relative cover of species with 1% or higher cover in any sample area. ...................................... 6 Table 5. Non-native species documented in 1992 .................................................................................... 7 Brown Bridge Quiet Area FQA and Monitoring, 2013, Page ii Introduction The Brown Bridge dam was constructed on the immediate vicinity of the dam and reservoir the Boardman River in 1921 for producing (A-D, Figure 3), and the likelihood of the spread hydropower, creating the 191 acre Brown Bridge of invasive plants. These studies concluded that pond, approximately 12 miles southeast of wetlands A and B would be largely sustained by Traverse City (Figures 1 and 2). In 2004, it was groundwater discharge, while 60% of wetland C determined that it was no longer economically all of wetland D would be converted to non- feasible to use the dam for hydropower, and it wetland (USFWS 2011). This would result in was decommissioned in 2006. Subsequently, an anticipated loss of 61.1 acres of wetland to be the aging structure became a safety hazard, offset by the expected development of 74 acres requiring several water drawdowns and spurring of wetland on newly exposed bottomlands after consideration of alternatives for the dam, the drawdown of the reservoir. These newly including removal and restoration of the original exposed soils, however, would be extremely cold water river. vulnerable to invasion by non-native plants, Environmental studies were undertaken to including at least 12 highly invasive species that assess potential impacts from dam removal, pose a significant threat to the restoration including consequences for existing wetlands in (USFWS 2011, Christensen and Beachy 2012). Figure 1. Brown Bridge Dam. Figure 2. Brown Bridge Pond. Figure 3. Brown Bridge wetlands documented in the draft Environmental Impact Statement (USFWS 2011). Brown Bridge Quiet Area FQA and Monitoring, 2013, Page 1 The bottomlands have been a hotspot for Network (ISN), led by the Grand Traverse invasive species establishment during the Conservation District, resulted in comprehensive previous partial drawdowns. Twenty-six species invasive plant surveys of the Brown Bridge were documented in Brown Bridge Quiet Area Quiet Area. Infestations of all detected species prior to dam removal (Table 1). Twelve of these were mapped and an invasive species are among the top twenty invasive plants for the management plan was developed (Christensen region—those that land managers believe pose and Beachy 2012). Implementation of the plan the biggest threat to high quality natural areas was initiated prior to dam removal, including (Appendix A). Of highest concern were the treatments for bull thistle, Canada thistle, reed sizeable infestations of reed canary grass, non- canary grass and non-native phragmites. native phragmites, narrow-leaved cat-tail and Follow-up treatments for these and several other Canada thistle found in the immediate vicinity of species were implemented immediately after the reservoir. All four of these are particularly dam removal, according to a carefully planned aggressive colonizers. schedule, and using best known treatment The commitment to minimize the spread of techniques for each targeted species. existing infestations and prevent new species The conservation community is poised to from establishing in the restoration is strong. continue to detect
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A REVISION of TRISETUM Victor L. Finot,' Paul M
    A REVISION OF TRISETUM Victor L. Finot,' Paul M. Peterson,3 (POACEAE: POOIDEAE: Fernando 0 Zuloaga,* Robert J. v sorene, and Oscar Mattnei AVENINAE) IN SOUTH AMERICA1 ABSTRACT A taxonomic treatment of Trisetum Pers. for South America, is given. Eighteen species and six varieties of Trisetum are recognized in South America. Chile (14 species, 3 varieties) and Argentina (12 species, 5 varieties) have the greatest number of taxa in the genus. Two varieties, T. barbinode var. sclerophyllum and T longiglume var. glabratum, are endemic to Argentina, whereas T. mattheii and T nancaguense are known only from Chile. Trisetum andinum is endemic to Ecuador, T. macbridei is endemic to Peru, and T. foliosum is endemic to Venezuela. A total of four species are found in Ecuador and Peru, and there are two species in Venezuela and Colombia. The following new species are described and illustrated: Trisetum mattheii Finot and T nancaguense Finot, from Chile, and T pyramidatum Louis- Marie ex Finot, from Chile and Argentina. The following two new combinations are made: T barbinode var. sclerophyllum (Hack, ex Stuck.) Finot and T. spicatum var. cumingii (Nees ex Steud.) Finot. A key for distinguishing the species and varieties of Trisetum in South America is given. The names Koeleria cumingii Nees ex Steud., Trisetum sect. Anaulacoa Louis-Marie, Trisetum sect. Aulacoa Louis-Marie, Trisetum subg. Heterolytrum Louis-Marie, Trisetum subg. Isolytrum Louis-Marie, Trisetum subsect. Koeleriformia Louis-Marie, Trisetum subsect. Sphenopholidea Louis-Marie, Trisetum ma- lacophyllum Steud., Trisetum variabile E. Desv., and Trisetum variabile var. virescens E. Desv. are lectotypified. Key words: Aveninae, Gramineae, Poaceae, Pooideae, Trisetum.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Types of American Grasses
    z LIBRARY OF Si AS-HITCHCOCK AND AGNES'CHASE 4: SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM oL TiiC. CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE United States National Herbarium Volume XII, Part 3 TXE&3 OF AMERICAN GRASSES . / A STUDY OF THE AMERICAN SPECIES OF GRASSES DESCRIBED BY LINNAEUS, GRONOVIUS, SLOANE, SWARTZ, AND MICHAUX By A. S. HITCHCOCK z rit erV ^-C?^ 1 " WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1908 BULLETIN OF THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM Issued June 18, 1908 ii PREFACE The accompanying paper, by Prof. A. S. Hitchcock, Systematic Agrostologist of the United States Department of Agriculture, u entitled Types of American grasses: a study of the American species of grasses described by Linnaeus, Gronovius, Sloane, Swartz, and Michaux," is an important contribution to our knowledge of American grasses. It is regarded as of fundamental importance in the critical sys- tematic investigation of any group of plants that the identity of the species described by earlier authors be determined with certainty. Often this identification can be made only by examining the type specimen, the original description being inconclusive. Under the American code of botanical nomenclature, which has been followed by the author of this paper, "the nomenclatorial t}rpe of a species or subspecies is the specimen to which the describer originally applied the name in publication." The procedure indicated by the American code, namely, to appeal to the type specimen when the original description is insufficient to identify the species, has been much misunderstood by European botanists. It has been taken to mean, in the case of the Linnsean herbarium, for example, that a specimen in that herbarium bearing the same name as a species described by Linnaeus in his Species Plantarum must be taken as the type of that species regardless of all other considerations.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Name Species Common Name Abies Lasiocarpa FIR Subalpine Acacia Macracantha ACACIA Long-Spine
    Scientific Name Species Common Name Abies lasiocarpa FIR Subalpine Acacia macracantha ACACIA Long-spine Acacia roemeriana CATCLAW Roemer Acer grandidentatum MAPLE Canyon Acer nigrum MAPLE Black Acer platanoides MAPLE Norway Acer saccharinum MAPLE Silver Aesculus pavia BUCKEYE Red Aesculus sylvatica BUCKEYE Painted Ailanthus altissima AILANTHUS Tree-of-heaven Albizia julibrissin SILKTREE Mimosa Albizia lebbek LEBBEK Lebbek Alnus iridis ssp. sinuata ALDER Sitka Alnus maritima ALDER Seaside Alvaradoa amorphoides ALVARADOA Mexican Amelanchier laevis SERVICEBERRY Allegheny Amyris balsamifera TORCHWOOD Balsam Annona squamosa SUGAR-APPLE NA Araucaria cunninghamii ARAUCARIA Cunningham Arctostaphylos glauca MANZANITA Bigberry Asimina obovata PAWPAW Bigflower Bourreria radula STRONGBACK Rough Brasiliopuntia brasiliensis PRICKLY-PEAR Brazilian Bursera simaruba GUMBO-LIMBO NA Caesalpinia pulcherrima FLOWERFENCE NA Capparis flexuosa CAPERTREE Limber CRUCIFIXION- Castela emoryi THORN NA Casuarina equisetifolia CASUARINA Horsetail Ceanothus arboreus CEANOTHUS Feltleaf Ceanothus spinosus CEANOTHUS Greenbark Celtis lindheimeri HACKBERRY Lindheimer Celtis occidentalis HACKBERRY Common Cephalanthus occidentalis BUTTONBUSH Common Cercis canadensis REDBUD Eastern Cercocarpus traskiae CERCOCARPUS Catalina Chrysophyllum oliviforme SATINLEAF NA Citharexylum berlandieri FIDDLEWOOD Berlandier Citrus aurantifolia LIME NA Citrus sinensis ORANGE Orange Coccoloba uvifera SEAGRAPE NA Colubrina arborescens COLUBRINA Coffee Colubrina cubensis COLUBRINA Cuba Condalia globosa
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin No. 6: Check List of Woody Plants Growing in the Connecticut Arboretum and Guide to the Arboretum Richard H
    Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College Bulletins Connecticut College Arboretum 12-1950 Bulletin No. 6: Check List of Woody Plants Growing in the Connecticut Arboretum and Guide to the Arboretum Richard H. Goodwin Katherine H. Heinig Kaleb P. Jansson Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/arbbulletins Part of the Botany Commons, and the Forest Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Goodwin, Richard H.; Heinig, Katherine H.; and Jansson, Kaleb P., "Bulletin No. 6: Check List of Woody Plants Growing in the Connecticut Arboretum and Guide to the Arboretum" (1950). Bulletins. Paper 6. http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/arbbulletins/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Connecticut College Arboretum at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bulletins by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. CHECK LIST OF WOODY PLANTS GROWING IN THE CONNECTICUT ARBORETUM AND GUIDE TO THE ARBORETUM RICHARD H. GOODWIN, KATHERINE H. HEINIG AND KALEB P. JANSSON CONNECTICUT ARBORETUM CONNECTICUT COLLEGE BULLETIN No. 6 NEW LONDON, CONNECTICUT DECEMBER, 1950 CHECK LIST OF WOODY PLANTS GROWING IN THE CONNECTICUT ARBORETUM AND GUIDE TO THE ARBORETUM RICHARD H. GOODWIN, (CATHERINE H. HEINIG AND KALEB P. JANSSON CONNECTICUT ARBORETUM CONNECTICUT COLLEGE BULLETIN No. 6 NEW LONDON, CONNECTICUT DECEMBER, 1950 INTRODUCTION One of the chief objectives of the Connecticut Arboretum has been to assemble a collection of all the species of woody plants native to the northeastern United States which can be grown in the New London area.
    [Show full text]
  • Earleaf Foxglove (Agalinis Auriculata)
    Community Conservation Assessment for Earleaf Foxglove (Agalinis Auriculata) USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region Date Name Location This document is undergoing peer review, comments welcome This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information and serves as a Conservation Assessment for the Eastern Region of the Forest Service. It does not represent a management decision by the U.S. Forest Service. Though the best scientific information available was used and subject experts were consulted in preparation of this document, it is expected that new information will arise. In the spirit of continuous learning and adaptive management, if you have information that will assist in conserving the subject community, please contact the Eastern Region of the Forest Service - Threatened and Endangered Species Program at 310 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 580 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. Community Conservation Assessment forEarleaf Foxglove (Agalinis Auriculata) 2 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................. 4 COMMUNITY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM AND SYNONYMS............................ 4 DESCRIPTION OF COMMUNITY............................................................................... 4 COMMUNITY ECOLOGY/ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONSError! Bookmark not defined. RANGE OF NATURAL VARIABILITY: COMMUNITY DISTRIBUTION AND CONDITIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Alliaria Petiolata (Garlic
    ABSTRACT ALLIARIA PETIOLATA (GARLIC MUSTARD) RESPONSE TO HERBICIDE AND JUNE PRECIPITATION, AND SUBSEQUENT EFFECTS ON THE FOREST FLOOR COMMUNITY by Wendy Wenger Hochstedler The impact of invasive plant species on native plants is largely assumed to be negative, but supporting evidence is sparse. We examined the long-term effects of herbicide on Alliaria petiolata and the subsequent effects on the plant community in southwestern Ohio. November herbicide application effectively killed A. petiolata, but did not reduce recruitment; spring densities of A. petiolata rosettes were not lower in sprayed plots. Only modest differences were noted in forest floor vegetation, suggesting A. petiolata rosettes competed with other plant species. We tested the hypothesis that higher June precipitation promotes rosette growth and survival with a rain shelter experiment. The three different water treatments affected soil moisture, but not A. petiolata growth or survival. Dry treatments may not have replicated drought years based on water availability measurements. June precipitation is probably not a reliable predictor of A. petiolata rosette survival in years with above average precipitation. ALLIARIA PETIOLATA (GARLIC MUSTARD) RESPONSE TO HERBICIDE AND JUNE PRECIPITATION, AND SUBSEQUENT EFFECTS ON THE FOREST FLOOR COMMUNITY A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Botany by Wendy Wenger Hochstedler Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2006 Advisor ____________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Illinois Native Trees
    Technical Forestry Bulletin · NRES-102 Checklist of Illinois Native Trees Jay C. Hayek, Extension Forestry Specialist Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Sciences Updated May 2019 This Technical Forestry Bulletin serves as a checklist of Tree species prevalence (Table 2), or commonness, and Illinois native trees, both angiosperms (hardwoods) and gym- county distribution generally follows Iverson et al. (1989) and nosperms (conifers). Nearly every species listed in the fol- Mohlenbrock (2002). Additional sources of data with respect lowing tables† attains tree-sized stature, which is generally to species prevalence and county distribution include Mohlen- defined as having a(i) single stem with a trunk diameter brock and Ladd (1978), INHS (2011), and USDA’s The Plant Da- greater than or equal to 3 inches, measured at 4.5 feet above tabase (2012). ground level, (ii) well-defined crown of foliage, and(iii) total vertical height greater than or equal to 13 feet (Little 1979). Table 2. Species prevalence (Source: Iverson et al. 1989). Based on currently accepted nomenclature and excluding most minor varieties and all nothospecies, or hybrids, there Common — widely distributed with high abundance. are approximately 184± known native trees and tree-sized Occasional — common in localized patches. shrubs found in Illinois (Table 1). Uncommon — localized distribution or sparse. Rare — rarely found and sparse. Nomenclature used throughout this bulletin follows the Integrated Taxonomic Information System —the ITIS data- Basic highlights of this tree checklist include the listing of 29 base utilizes real-time access to the most current and accept- native hawthorns (Crataegus), 21 native oaks (Quercus), 11 ed taxonomy based on scientific consensus.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxa Named in Honor of Ihsan A. Al-Shehbaz
    TAXA NAMED IN HONOR OF IHSAN A. AL-SHEHBAZ 1. Tribe Shehbazieae D. A. German, Turczaninowia 17(4): 22. 2014. 2. Shehbazia D. A. German, Turczaninowia 17(4): 20. 2014. 3. Shehbazia tibetica (Maxim.) D. A. German, Turczaninowia 17(4): 20. 2014. 4. Astragalus shehbazii Zarre & Podlech, Feddes Repert. 116: 70. 2005. 5. Bornmuellerantha alshehbaziana Dönmez & Mutlu, Novon 20: 265. 2010. 6. Centaurea shahbazii Ranjbar & Negaresh, Edinb. J. Bot. 71: 1. 2014. 7. Draba alshehbazii Klimeš & D. A. German, Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 158: 750. 2008. 8. Ferula shehbaziana S. A. Ahmad, Harvard Pap. Bot. 18: 99. 2013. 9. Matthiola shehbazii Ranjbar & Karami, Nordic J. Bot. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2013.00326.x, 10. Plocama alshehbazii F. O. Khass., D. Khamr., U. Khuzh. & Achilova, Stapfia 101: 25. 2014. 11. Alshehbazia Salariato & Zuloaga, Kew Bulletin …….. 2015 12. Alshehbzia hauthalii (Gilg & Muschl.) Salariato & Zuloaga 13. Ihsanalshehbazia Tahir Ali & Thines, Taxon 65: 93. 2016. 14. Ihsanalshehbazia granatensis (Boiss. & Reuter) Tahir Ali & Thines, Taxon 65. 93. 2016. 15. Aubrieta alshehbazii Dönmez, Uǧurlu & M.A.Koch, Phytotaxa 299. 104. 2017. 16. Silene shehbazii S.A.Ahmad, Novon 25: 131. 2017. PUBLICATIONS OF IHSAN A. AL-SHEHBAZ 1973 1. Al-Shehbaz, I. A. 1973. The biosystematics of the genus Thelypodium (Cruciferae). Contrib. Gray Herb. 204: 3-148. 1977 2. Al-Shehbaz, I. A. 1977. Protogyny, Cruciferae. Syst. Bot. 2: 327-333. 3. A. R. Al-Mayah & I. A. Al-Shehbaz. 1977. Chromosome numbers for some Leguminosae from Iraq. Bot. Notiser 130: 437-440. 1978 4. Al-Shehbaz, I. A. 1978. Chromosome number reports, certain Cruciferae from Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Curriculum Vitae
    Jason Ager Koontz Biology Department, Augustana College Phone: 309-794-3442 639-38th Street FAX: 309-794-8004 Rock Island, IL 61201 E-mail: [email protected] Education 1993 B.S. (Botany) Iowa State University, Ames, IA (with Distinction, Honors Program, and Phi Beta Kappa) 1995 M.S. (Botany) Miami University, Oxford, OH 2000 Ph.D. (Botany) Washington State University, Pullman, WA Current Position 7/14-present: Chair of Biology 8/11-7/14: Co-Chair of Biology 8/10: Tenured and promoted to Associate Professor 9/04-8/10: Assistant Professor of Biology Becoming Biologists (BI150), General Botany (BI220), Cell Biology (BI210), Nutrition (BI263; 2004-2006), Natural History of Ireland (BI328; 2010, 2013), Conservation Biology (BI410), Conservation Biology Senior Inquiry (BI464) Non-Academic Positions 5/12-present: Research Associate, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, CA. 1/06-present: Research Associate, Department of Botany, The Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL. 10/04-present: Adjunct Assistant Professional Scientist, Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL. 5/00-9/04: Assistant Research Scientist III, Plant Systematist, Centers for Biodiversity and Wildlife and Plant Ecology, Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL. Academic Positions 10/01-12/07: Affiliate Assistant Professor, Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL. 8/95-5/00: Graduate Teaching Assistant, Department of Botany, Washington State University,
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM LIST OF THE RARE PLANTS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2012 Edition Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist and John Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org Table of Contents LIST FORMAT ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 NORTH CAROLINA RARE PLANT LIST ......................................................................................................................... 10 NORTH CAROLINA PLANT WATCH LIST ..................................................................................................................... 71 Watch Category
    [Show full text]