DOCSLIB.ORG

EU-27 Watch No 8

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EU-27 Watch No 8 EU-27 WATCH No. 8 ISSN 1610-6458 Issued in March 2009 Edited by the Institute for European Politics (IEP), Berlin in collaboration with the Austrian Institute of International Affairs, Vienna Institute for International Relations, Zagreb Bulgarian European Community Studies Association, Institute for World Economics of the Hungarian Sofia Academy of Sciences, Budapest Center for European Studies / Middle East Technical Institute for Strategic and International Studies, University, Ankara Lisbon Centre européen de Sciences Po, Paris Institute of International and European Affairs, Centre d’étude de la vie politique, Université libre de Dublin Bruxelles Institute of International Relations, Prague Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches Européennes Institute of International Relations and Political Robert Schuman, Luxembourg Science, Vilnius University Centre of International Relations, Ljubljana Istituto Affari Internazionali, Rome Cyprus Institute for Mediterranean, European and Latvian Institute of International Affairs, International Studies, Nicosia Riga Danish Institute for International Studies, Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies, Copenhagen University of Malta Elcano Royal Institute and UNED University, Madrid Netherlands Institute of International Relations European Institute of Romania, Bucharest ‘Clingendael’, The Hague Federal Trust for Education and Research, London Slovak Foreign Policy Association, Bratislava Finnish Institute of International Affairs, Helsinki Stockholm International Peace Research Institute Foundation for European Studies - European (SIPRI) Institute, Łodz Trans European Policy Studies Association Greek Centre of European Studies and Research, (TEPSA), Brussels Athens University of Tartu Bundesallee 23, D-10717 Berlin Tel.: +49/30/88.91.34-0, Fax: +49/30/88.91.34-99 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.iep-berlin.de www.eu-consent.net EU-27 Watch On the Project The enlarged EU of 27 members is in a process of reshaping its constitutional and political order, of continuing membership talks with candidate countries and taking on new obligations in international politics. This project sheds light on key issues and challenges of European integration. Institutes from all 27 EU member states as well as from Croatia and Turkey participate in the project. The aim is to give a full comparative picture of debates on European integration and current developments in European politics in each of these countries. This survey was conducted on the basis of a questionnaire that has been elaborated in November 2008 by all participating institutes. Most of the 29 reports were delivered in February 2009. This issue and all previous issues of EU-27 Watch (formerly EU- 25/27 Watch) are available on the homepage of EU-CONSENT (www.eu- consent.net) and on the internet sites of most of the contributing institutes. Please note the detailed table of content that allows readers to easily grasp key information and headlines of the country reports. The Institute for European Politics (IEP) in Berlin coordinates and edits EU-27 Watch. The IEP is grateful to the Otto Wolff-Foundation, Cologne, for supporting its research activities in the field of “Enlargement and neighbourhood policy of the EU”. Contact persons at the IEP are Barbara Lippert ([email protected]) and Tanja Leppik-Bork ([email protected]). Institutes/authors are responsible for the content of their country reports. Recommended citation form: Institut für Europäische Politik (Ed.): EU-27 Watch, No. 8, March 2009, Berlin, available at: http://www.eu-consent.net/content.asp?contentid=522. EU-27 Watch is part of EU-CONSENT, a network of excellence for joint research and teaching comprising more than 50 research institutes that addresses questions of the mutual reinforcing effects of deepening and widening of the EU. EU-CONSENT is supported by the European Union’s 6th Framework Programme. EU-27 Watch | Table of Content Table of Content On the Project ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Table of Content .................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Authors ..................................................................................................................................... 11 The EU in 2009 – a reassuring outlook even in times of crisis? .................................................... 12 2009: A year of opportunities and uncertainties?............................................................................ 18 How does the future of the EU after the Irish ‘No’ look like?.......................................................... 19 Austria (Austrian Institute of International Affairs) Conclusions of European Council seen mainly positive ................................................................ 20 Belgium (Centre d’étude de la vie politique, Université libre de Bruxelles) Hope for an early second Irish referendum but no major concern about the future of the EU ...... 20 Bulgaria (Bulgarian European Community Studies Association) Reformulation of the relationship between citizens and political elites needed............................. 22 Croatia (Institute for International Relations) Croatian concerns about the enlargement prospects after the Irish ‘No’....................................... 24 Cyprus (Cyprus Institute for Mediterranean, European and International Studies) European Council’s decision will help to overcome the institutional crisis..................................... 26 Czech Republic (Institute of International Relations) The parliament will finally decide on the Lisbon Treaty ................................................................. 28 Denmark (Danish Institute for International Studies) Lisbon Treaty and Danish opt-outs ................................................................................................ 30 Estonia (University of Tartu) A threat to Estonia’s long-term priority of enlargement?................................................................ 32 Finland (Finnish Institute of International Affairs) Quiet… And not very interested?................................................................................................... 33 France (Centre européen de Sciences Po) The future of the EU after the Irish ‘No’: many uncertainties ......................................................... 35 Germany (Institute for European Politics) Continuation of ratification process welcomed............................................................................... 37 Greece (Greek Centre of European Studies and Research) Keep the light burning .................................................................................................................... 39 Hungary (Institute for World Economics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) A strong pro-Lisbon and future-oriented stance............................................................................. 40 Ireland (Institute of International and European Affairs) The future of the EU after the Irish ‘No’ ......................................................................................... 41 Italy (Istituto Affari Internazionali) Linkage between European citizens and EU institutions has to be restored................................. 44 Latvia (Latvian Institute of International Affairs) National crisis management more important than future of the EU ............................................... 47 Lithuania (Institute of International Relations and Political Science, Vilnius University) Attention concentrated on energy and the European Economy Recovery Plan............................ 49 Luxembourg (Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches Européennes Robert Schuman) Optimism about reinforcement of democracy, transparency and efficiency .................................. 50 Malta (Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies, University of Malta) Hope for the adoption of the Lisbon Treaty in 2009....................................................................... 52 Netherlands (Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’) Future of the EU after the Irish ‘No’................................................................................................ 53 Poland (Foundation for European Studies - European Institute) Positive attitude remains in Poland despite the Irish ‘No’ .............................................................. 54 EU-27 Watch | Table of Content Portugal (Institute for Strategic and International Studies) Lisbon Treaty ‘is not dead’ ............................................................................................................. 55 Romania (European Institute of Romania) After the Irish ‘No’: proceed with optimism.....................................................................................58 Slovakia (Slovak Foreign Policy Association) Slovakia and the institutional future of the EU ............................................................................... 61 Slovenia (Centre of International Relations) No stall in the enlargement process............................................................................................... 62 Spain (Elcano Royal Institute) The future of the EU after the Irish ‘No’ ......................................................................................... 64 Sweden (Stockholm International Peace
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Governo Berlusconi Iv Ministri E Sottosegretari Di
    GOVERNO BERLUSCONI IV MINISTRI E SOTTOSEGRETARI DI STATO MINISTRI CON PORTAFOGLIO Franco Frattini, ministero degli Affari Esteri Roberto Maroni, ministero dell’Interno Angelino Alfano, ministero della Giustizia Giulio Tremonti, ministero dell’Economia e Finanze Claudio Scajola, ministero dello Sviluppo Economico Mariastella Gelmini, ministero dell’Istruzione Università e Ricerca Maurizio Sacconi, ministero del Lavoro, Salute e Politiche sociali Ignazio La Russa, ministero della Difesa; Luca Zaia, ministero delle Politiche Agricole, e Forestali Stefania Prestigiacomo, ministero dell’Ambiente, Tutela Territorio e Mare Altero Matteoli, ministero delle Infrastrutture e Trasporti Sandro Bondi, ministero dei Beni e Attività Culturali MINISTRI SENZA PORTAFOGLIO Raffaele Fitto, ministro per i Rapporti con le Regioni Gianfranco Rotondi, ministro per l’Attuazione del Programma Renato Brunetta, ministro per la Pubblica amministrazione e l'Innovazione Mara Carfagna, ministro per le Pari opportunità Andrea Ronchi, ministro per le Politiche Comunitarie Elio Vito, ministro per i Rapporti con il Parlamento Umberto Bossi, ministro per le Riforme per il Federalismo Giorgia Meloni, ministro per le Politiche per i Giovani Roberto Calderoli, ministro per la Semplificazione Normativa SOTTOSEGRETARI DI STATO Gianni Letta, sottosegretario di Stato alla Presidenza del Consiglio dei ministri, con le funzioni di segretario del Consiglio medesimo PRESIDENZA DEL CONSIGLIO DEI MINISTRI Maurizio Balocchi, Semplificazione normativa Paolo Bonaiuti, Editoria Michela Vittoria
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: “We Don´T Want Islam in Czech Republic”
    Case Study: We Don´t Want Islam in Czech Republic Jaroslav Valuch May 2018 Summary Martin Konvicka, co-founder and leader of the “We Don't Want Islam in Czech Republic” initiative (Islám v České republice nechceme – IVCRN) and one of its derivative movements, “Bloc Against Islam,” is currently under police investigation and awaiting trial for inciting hatred via comments on the Facebook page of the initiative. Inciting hatred against a group of persons or restricting their rights is a criminal offence according to the Czech legal code. This initiative started in 2009 as a very successful Facebook page community (the page had up to 160,000 followers in January 2016 before it was blocked by Facebook). It then morphed into a political movement with aspirations to gain representation in the Senate and parliament. At the height of his public political career, Konvicka and Bloc Against Islam received the endorsement of the President of the Czech Republic, who publicly supported the initiative by delivering a speech on their stage on November 17th 2015, the National Day of Fighting for Freedom and Democracy (anniversary of 1989 Velvet revolution). Konvicka decided to run in the Senate election in October 2016 with his new initiative called Alternative for Czech Republic (directly inspired by the German Alternative fur Deutschland). His run ended in failure, and he finished second from the bottom. Dangerous Speech Framework Analysis Social and Historical Context Since the rise of violent right-wing extremism after the Czech Velvet Revolution in 1989, measures to counter extremism (such as the training of security forces and the adoption of extremism and hate crime legislation) have been gradually implemented.1 The threat has received serious attention from even the highest political figures.
    [Show full text]
  • (SRHR) in European Institutions. by Elena
    Study for POLICY MAKERS on opposition to sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) in European institutions. by Elena Zacharenko Anti-gender mobilisations in Europe Study for policy makers on opposition to sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) in European institutions Author: Elena Zacharenko This study has been commissioned by Heidi Hautala MEP, Vice President of the European Parliament. Published in December 2020 Book cover illustration, design and layout by Laura Ospina - www.lauraennube.com 2 Table of CONTENTS Foreword from MEP Heidi Hautala.............................................................04 Executive summary.......................................................................................06 What is this study and who is it for? ........................................................... 08 Part 1: What drives the anti-gender movement?...........................................10 1.1 Origins and current manifestations...........................................................12 1.2 Global connections ..................................................................................13 1.3 The anti-gender movement in the EU...................................................... 16 1.4 Is it a backlash?........................................................................................23 1.5 Recommendations...................................................................................24 Part 2: Main anti-gender actors and their tactics at EU level........................26 2.1 Lobbying organisations
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Politics and Views on Brexit
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 8362, 2 May 2019 The EU27: Internal Politics By Stefano Fella, Vaughne Miller, Nigel Walker and Views on Brexit Contents: 1. Austria 2. Belgium 3. Bulgaria 4. Croatia 5. Cyprus 6. Czech Republic 7. Denmark 8. Estonia 9. Finland 10. France 11. Germany 12. Greece 13. Hungary 14. Ireland 15. Italy 16. Latvia 17. Lithuania 18. Luxembourg 19. Malta 20. Netherlands 21. Poland 22. Portugal 23. Romania 24. Slovakia 25. Slovenia 26. Spain 27. Sweden www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 The EU27: Internal Politics and Views on Brexit Contents Summary 6 1. Austria 13 1.1 Key Facts 13 1.2 Background 14 1.3 Current Government and Recent Political Developments 15 1.4 Views on Brexit 17 2. Belgium 25 2.1 Key Facts 25 2.2 Background 25 2.3 Current Government and recent political developments 26 2.4 Views on Brexit 28 3. Bulgaria 32 3.1 Key Facts 32 3.2 Background 32 3.3 Current Government and recent political developments 33 3.4 Views on Brexit 35 4. Croatia 37 4.1 Key Facts 37 4.2 Background 37 4.3 Current Government and recent political developments 38 4.4 Views on Brexit 39 5. Cyprus 42 5.1 Key Facts 42 5.2 Background 42 5.3 Current Government and recent political developments 43 5.4 Views on Brexit 45 6. Czech Republic 49 6.1 Key Facts 49 6.2 Background 49 6.3 Current Government and recent political developments 50 6.4 Views on Brexit 53 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain's European Question and an In/Out Referendum
    To be or not to be in Europe: is that the question? Britain’s European question and an in/out referendum TIM OLIVER* ‘It is time to settle this European question in British politics.’ David Cameron, 23 January 2013.1 Britain’s European question It came as no surprise to those who follow the issue of the European Union in British politics that David Cameron’s January 2013 speech on Europe excited a great deal of comment. The EU is among the most divisive issues in British politics. Cameron himself drew on this to justify his committing the Conservative Party, should it win the general election in 2015, to seek a renegotiated position for the UK within the EU which would then be put to the British people in an in/out referendum. Growing public frustrations at UK–EU relations were, he argued, the result of both a longstanding failure to consult the British people about their country’s place in the EU, and a changing EU that was undermining the current relationship between Britain and the Union. As a result, he argued, ‘the democratic consent for the EU in Britain is now wafer-thin’. Cameron’s speech was met with both criticism and praise from Eurosceptics and pro-Europeans alike.2 In a speech at Chatham House backing Cameron’s plan, the former Conservative prime minister Sir John Major best captured some of the hopes for a referendum: ‘The relationship with Europe has poisoned British politics for too long, distracted parliament from other issues and come close to destroying the Conservative Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Camera Dei Deputati
    CAMERA DEI DEPUTATI XVII LEGISLATURA Resoconto stenografico dell'Assemblea Seduta n. 622 di mercoledì 11 maggio 2016 Seguito della discussione della proposta di legge: S. 2081 – D'iniziativa dei senatori: Cirinnà ed altri: Regolamentazione delle unioni civili tra persone dello stesso sesso e disciplina delle convivenze (Approvata dal Senato) (A.C. 3634). PRESIDENTE. L'ordine del giorno reca il seguito della discussione della proposta di legge, già approvata dal Senato, n. 3634: D'iniziativa dei senatori: Cirinnà ed altri: Regolamentazione delle unioni civili tra persone dello stesso sesso e disciplina delle convivenze. Ricordo che, nella seduta di ieri, il Governo ha posto la questione di fiducia sull'approvazione, senza emendamenti ed articoli aggiuntivi, dell'articolo unico della proposta di legge n. 3634, nel testo della Commissione, identico a quello approvato dal Senato. (Dichiarazioni di voto sulla questione di fiducia – Articolo unico – A.C. 3634) PRESIDENTE. Passiamo alle dichiarazioni di voto sulla questione di fiducia da parte dei rappresentanti dei gruppi e delle componenti politiche del gruppo Misto. Ha chiesto di parlare per dichiarazione di voto l'onorevole Pia Elda Locatelli. Ne ha facoltà. PIA ELDA LOCATELLI. Grazie, signor Presidente. Il gruppo Socialista voterà a favore della fiducia al Governo, anche se ci lascia perplessi l'uso di questo strumento, perché ci sembra improprio per provvedimenti che riguardano più o meno direttamente i temi etici, ancor più quando questi si intrecciano con i diritti civili. Nel merito del testo uscito dal Senato, non ci soddisfa perché contiene alcune misure che discriminano sulla base dell'orientamento sessuale e non ne contiene altre, come l'adozione del figlio biologico o della partner, che avrebbe qualificato il provvedimento.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 YEARS of EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT HISTORY and Subjugated
    European Parliament – 50th birthday QA-70-07-089-EN-C series 1958–2008 Th ere is hardly a political system in the modern world that does not have a parliamentary assembly in its institutional ‘toolkit’. Even autocratic or totalitarian BUILDING PARLIAMENT: systems have found a way of creating the illusion of popular expression, albeit tamed 50 YEARS OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT HISTORY and subjugated. Th e parliamentary institution is not in itself a suffi cient condition for granting a democratic licence. Yet the existence of a parliament is a necessary condition of what 1958–2008 we have defi ned since the English, American and French Revolutions as ‘democracy’. Since the start of European integration, the history of the European Parliament has fallen between these two extremes. Europe was not initially created with democracy in mind. Yet Europe today is realistic only if it espouses the canons of democracy. In other words, political realism in our era means building a new utopia, that of a supranational or post-national democracy, while for two centuries the DNA of democracy has been its realisation within the nation-state. Yves Mény President of the European University Institute, Florence BUILDING PARLIAMENT: BUILDING 50 YEARS OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT HISTORY PARLIAMENT EUROPEAN OF YEARS 50 ISBN 978-92-823-2368-7 European Parliament – 50th birthday series Price in Luxembourg (excluding VAT): EUR 25 BUILDING PARLIAMENT: 50 YEARS OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT HISTORY 1958–2008 This work was produced by the European University Institute, Florence, under the direction of Yves Mény, for the European Parliament. Contributors: Introduction, Jean-Marie Palayret; Part One, Luciano Bardi, Nabli Beligh, Cristina Sio Lopez and Olivier Costa (coordinator); Part Two, Pierre Roca, Ann Rasmussen and Paolo Ponzano (coordinator); Part Three, Florence Benoît-Rohmer; Conclusions, Yves Mény.
    [Show full text]
  • Atti Parlamentari —I— Camera Dei Deputati
    Atti Parlamentari —I— Camera dei Deputati XVII LEGISLATURA — DISCUSSIONI — SEDUTA DEL 25 FEBBRAIO 2014 RESOCONTO STENOGRAFICO 179. SEDUTA DI MARTEDÌ 25 FEBBRAIO 2014 PRESIDENZA DEL PRESIDENTE LAURA BOLDRINI INDI DEI VICEPRESIDENTI MARINA SERENI E SIMONE BALDELLI INDICE RESOCONTO STENOGRAFICO .................... 1-143 PAG. PAG. Missioni ............................................................ 1 D’Ottavio Umberto (PD) ............................. 1 Fassina Stefano (PD) .................................. 15 Comunicazioni del Governo (Discussione) .. 1 Fedriga Massimiliano (LNA) ...................... 20 Formisano Aniello (Misto-CD) ................... 19 (Discussione) ..................................................... 1 Fratoianni Nicola (SEL) ............................. 8 Presidente ..................................................... 1 Librandi Gianfranco (SCpI) ....................... 14 Biancofiore Michaela (FI-PdL) .................. 2 Locatelli Pia Elda (Misto-PSI-PLI) ............ 22 Costa Enrico (NCD) .................................... 6 Marguerettaz Rudi Franco (LNA) ............ 4 De Mita Giuseppe (PI) ................................ 10 Ottobre Mauro (Misto-Min.Ling.) .............. 4 N. B. Il RESOCONTO SOMMARIO è disponibile on line già nel corso della seduta, alla pagina “Resoconti” del sito della Camera dei deputati. Il Resoconto Sommario è corredato di collegamenti ipertestuali verso il Resoconto Stenografico (Vedi RS) ed ai documenti di seduta (Vedi All. A). N. B. Sigle dei gruppi parlamentari: Partito Democratico:
    [Show full text]
  • What Happened to France's European Dream?
    1 FROM FOUNDING FATHERS TO RELUCTANT EUROPEANS; WHAT HAPPENED TO FRANCE’S EUROPEAN DREAM? Lecture delivered by Lara Marlowe, France correspondent for The Irish Times, to the Association of Franco-Irish Studies annual conference, National Concert Hall Dublin, 23 May 2014 The European project is threatened by public apathy and indifference. It is suffocated by the complexity of EU institutions, thwarted by national egotism, and threatened by the rise of populist, europhobic parties. Exit polls last night showed that Geert Wilders’ anti-Europe Freedom Party performed poorly, but we won’t know until Sunday night whether europhobe parties will, as predicted, led the polls in France and Britain. Over the decades I’ve lived in Paris, I’ve watched friends, neighbours and colleagues fall out of love with Europe. In preparing this lecture, I’ve tried to understand why. For weeks, I’ve been asking French people how they feel about Europe. THE DISILLUSIONED At the National Front’s May Day rally, an elderly lady with white hair, a retired accountant, told me how immigrants “invaded” her neighbourhood in Montmartre. “There’s no more work; there’s nothing,” she said. “I want une Europe choisie – a chosen Europe. At the very least, I want people who join Europe to be at our level. Our shops are closing because everything is made by the Chinese. I miss the franc terribly. I want us to be sovereign in our own country, not taking orders from Brussels.” A few nights ago, I had dinner with a French businesswoman who votes for centrist, pro- European parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Il Governo Tra Tecnica E Politica
    Quaderni del Gruppo di Pisa convegni Il Governo tra tecnica e politica a cura di Giorgio Grasso e con la collaborazione di Roberto Perrone Atti del Seminario Annuale dell’Associazione “Gruppo di Pisa”, Como, 20 novembre 2015 EDITORIALE SCIENTIFICA La realizzazione del presente Volume si è avvalsa della collaborazione della Banca Popolare di Sondrio e di un contributo dell’Università degli Studi dell’Insubria per il Convegno del Gruppo di Pisa del 20 novembre 2015 Proprietà letteraria riservata Copyright © 2016 Editoriale Scientifica s.r.l. Via San Biagio dei Librai, 39 – 80138 Napoli www.editorialescientifica.com ISBN 978-88-6342-981-7 SOMMARIO Il Governo tra tecnica e politica (premessa), Giorgio Grasso XIII RELAZIONI E DISCUSSANTS INTRODUZIONE GENERALE Renato Balduzzi 1 IL GOVERNO TRA TECNICA E POLITICA: LE FUNZIONI Antonella Sciortino 1. Premessa 9 2. Il ricorso alla tecnica in politica: una questione risalente 11 3. L’espansione delle funzioni governative a cominciare da quella normativa 15 4. La politica di bilancio tra governance economica europea ed esercizio del- la funzione di indirizzo politico 19 5. La politica estera e la politica militare tra paradigmi tecnologici e nuovi assetti geopolitici 28 6. Il Governo tra politica e amministrazione 32 7. L’esperienza dei governi cosiddetti tecnici e le refluenze sulla forma di go- verno 35 8. Qualche considerazione conclusiva sul ruolo della politica tra tentazioni tecnocratiche e nuove forme di “democrazia digitale” 42 VI sommario L’ORGANIZZAZIONE DEL GOVERNO TRA TECNICA E POLITICA Marco Cuniberti 1. Premessa 45 2. Tecnica, politica e mercato 47 2.1. Tecnica, politica e mercato nell’organizzazione dell’Unione europea 48 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • 7.4.09 Nota Al Presidente Del Consiglio
    CONFSAL - Vigili del Fuoco Federazione Nazionale Autonoma Vigili del Fuoco Roma, 7 aprile 2009 Al Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri On. Silvio BERLUSCONI e, p. c: Al Sottosegretario di Stato alla Presidenza del Consiglio On.le Gianni LETTA Al Presidente del Senato Sen. Renato SCHIFANI Al Presidente della Camera dei Deputati On. Gianfranco FINI Al Ministro dell’Interno On. Roberto MARONI Al Ministro per i Rapporti con le Regioni On. Raffaele FITTO Al Ministro per l’Attuazione del Programma di Governo On. Gianfranco ROTONDI Al Ministro per la Pubblica Amministrazione e Innovazione On. Renato BRUNETTA Al Ministro per le Pari opportunità On. Mara CARFAGNA Al Ministro per le Politiche Europee On. Andrea RONCHI Al Ministro per i Rapporti con il Parlamento On. Elio VITO Al Ministro per le Riforme per il Federalismo On. Umberto BOSSI AL Ministro per le Politiche per i Giovani On. Giorgia MELONI Al Ministro per la Semplificazione Normativa On. Roberto CALDEROLI 00179 -Roma -Via Genzano, 133 - Tel 06.78384720 - Fax. 06.7842893 e-mail: [email protected] - Web: www.confsalvigilidelfuoco.it -2- Al Ministro per gli Affari Esteri On. Franco FRATTINI Al Ministro della Giustizia On. Angelino ALFANO Al Ministro della Difesa On. Ignazio LA RUSSA Al Ministro dell’Economia e Finanze On. Giulio TREMONTI Al Ministro per lo Sviluppo Economico On. Claudio SCAJOLA Al Ministro per le Politiche Agricole, Alimentari e Forestali On. Luca ZAIA Al Ministro per l’Ambiente, Tutela del Territorio e del Mare On. Stefania PRESTIGIACOMO Al ministro per le Infrastrutture e Trasporti On. Altero MATTEOLI Al Ministro per il Lavoro, Salute e Politiche Sociali On.
    [Show full text]