DOCSLIB.ORG

Policy Making by Appointment the Composition of the Norwegian

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Policy Making by Appointment the Composition of the Norwegian Policy Making By Appointment The Composition of the Norwegian Supreme Court 1945-2009 Draft Paper prepared for presentation at The Faculty of Law, University of Oslo, May 12, 2011 William R. Shaffer,a Gunnar Grendstad,b Eric N. Waltenburga a Department of Political Science b Department of Comparative Politics Purdue University University of Bergen Beering Hall of Liberal Arts and Education 100 N. University Street Christies gate 15 West Lafayette, IN 47907-2098, USA N-5007 Bergen, Norway Fax: +1-765-494-0833 Fax: +47-55589425 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] (ShafferGrendstadWaltenburg_PMBA_2011.pdf ) 1 Forutberegnelighet i rettsanvendelsen er kanskje like meget knyttet til viten om dommerne som til viten om regel og metode. Ketil Lund (1987:217). For de som kjenner prosedyren ved utnevnelse av høyesterettsdommere, fremstår disse konklusjonene som åpenbart uholdbare. Jens Edvin A. Skohgøy (2010:723). Policy Making By Appointment. The Composition of the Norwegian Supreme Court 1945-20091 1. Policy Making By Appointment In this chapter we examine the composition of the Supreme Court, since the characteristics of the sitting justices capture some of the experiences that can shape the political views of these policy makers. As indicated in the previous chapter, a very insular legal community dominates the Norwegian judicial system. Even the Supreme Court, located at the pinnacle of the Norwegian judicial process, is nearly invisible to the larger public. While no one expects justices to always respond to the ever-shifting winds of contemporary politics, the fact that the Supreme Court is a sheltered, almost obscure, political body is paradoxical in one of the world’s most democratic countries. Judges spend some important formative years in law school being socialized into the prevailing legal system, incorporating values into their political frame of reference. In fact, Supreme Court justices are recruited from that small pool of individuals who compiled the very strongest records in law school. Consequently, judges interpret public policy in light of such legal considerations as precedent, the meaning of laws under scrutiny, parliamentary goals embodied in legislation, and equitable considerations. There is little doubt that law school equips its graduates with the ability to engage in sophisticated legal reasoning that distinguishes lawyers from the population at large, or other professional groups for that matter. Certainly Supreme Court justices employ legal analysis when deciding cases. That is a given. Of course, as intimated earlier, the legal is not divorced from the political. Take the matter of equitable consideration, a criterion grounded in fair play. While a strict legal 1 Various Norwegian institutions and offices assisted in providing information: The National Archives of Norway, The Government Advocate, Director General of Public Prosecutions, The Ministry of Justice and the Police, the National Courts Administration, and Lovdata. We thank Anders Sondrup for research assistance in collecting information on the justices. His work was funded by the Meltzer Foundation at the University of Bergen. 2 interpretation might inform a Court decision, equitable consideration paves the way for extra- legal forces to influence the outcome.2 In fact, too much reliance on matters of “fairness” would be unsettling to scholars committed to what we call the “legal model” of judicial decision making (Magnussen, 2005). However, even what appear to be purely legalistic justifications may be cherry picked to support the ideological preference of a justice (Skoghøy, 2010). Be that as it may, many a judge will opt for a purely “legal” rationalization for staking out a policy position. Given that the judicial community is especially homogeneous (Hjellbrekke, 2007), if graduating from law school were the relevant characteristic of sitting justices, then they may be equally homogeneous in their decision- making behavior. But, they are not. They manifest differences in legal opinions that reveal a diversity of interpretation springing, in part, from their law school training, but also from socio-political factors impinging upon their judicial pronouncements. We contend that a lack of consensus on some key issues adjudicated by the Supreme Court may be the root cause for the non-unanimous decisions rendered. We focus primarily on the final stage of the process, and will make the case that votes cast in dissent from the majority opinion often reflect underlying political differences among the participating justices. Of course, the previously cited Ship Owner Tax case (Rt-2010-143) would appear to substantiate the claim, at least anecdotally. Certainly the Court seems to have become more muscular recently in its exercise of judicial review, as a matter of legal policy. However, in this 6-5 vote that went against the Social Democratic coalition government, all 5 minority votes were recorded by justices appointed by socialist governments, and 4 of the 6 majority votes were cast by those appointed by non-socialist governments. 3 A plausible interpretation would suggest that some underlying attitudinal predispositions were in play. 2 We do not intend to address the demarcation problem between legal and extra-legal forces. In general we refer to forces as all independent variables that are expected to influence judges’ decisions (Brace and Hall, 1997), as, for instance, when Dworkin (1988) uses the term ‘gravitational force’ when precedents narrow judges’ voting options, and when food breaks influence judges’ rulings (Danziger, Levav, and Avnaim-Pesso, 2011). For example, if legislators include the term ‘reasonable’ (rimelig) in a statute and leave the interpretation to the judge, does ‘reasonable’ amount to a legal or extra-legal force? On the other hand, legal sources refer to, e.g., laws, precedents, and legislative intent that invariantly present facts and arguments that may offer an anchoring, or not, for legal reasoning. 3 Still anecdotally, a cross-tabulation of the eleven justices’ votes by appointing government is statistically significant (Chi2=5.24; df=1; p<.02), whereas a cross-tabulation of the justices’ votes by experience at the Government Advocate, a hypothesis suggested by Georg Fredrik Rieber-Mohn (in, Kristjánsson 2010c) is not (Chi2=0.72; df=1; p<.38). 3 We recognize that offering concurring opinions also might reflect differing political values that have the potential to affect public policy (Corley, 2011). While we will analyze rigorously the complete non-unanimous Supreme Court five-justice panel votes taken in the post-War period, a systematic analysis of concurring opinions could easily strengthen the argument that the justices’ behavior reflects attitudinal differences, and possibly do so in a more nuanced fashion. Nevertheless, a great deal must be done with several decades of non- unanimous decisions before we venture into promising new areas. Although the Norwegian court system is appears to be a closed, insular one, an effort is made to select people of varying backgrounds, in order to incorporate a wide range of interests and life experiences (Domstolkommisjonen 1999). Of course, this principle is somewhat circumscribed by the fact that the pool of serious candidates is restricted to lawyers who performed extremely well in law school. Nevertheless, the extent to which this selection criterion is employed can produce a mix of justices more representative of the social, economic, and political predispositions of the broader public. Certainly those interests include, among other things, political ideology, gender-based issue positions, and regional orientations. If selecting applicants with an eye toward diversity does not have attitudinal implications, then appointing more women or aspirants from the far north might be only a politically correct charade of descriptive representation only. Not only are such extra-legal forces made manifest in the justices elevated to the Supreme Court, but those responsible for judicial recruitment are not immune from political preferences, as well. The reader should keep in mind that since World War II, the executive through the Ministry of Justice has dominated Court appointments. There are two phases of the process during which the government could influence, if not control, the appointment of justices: the (1) application and (2) recommendation stages. After announcing a Court opening, applications are accepted, and in more than one instance, potential candidates are asked, perhaps even lobbied, to apply. No doubt a purely sincere legal motive might encourage a well-placed member of the Norwegian elite, perhaps someone sequestered in the Ministry of Justice, to urge an eminently qualified individual to apply. In addition to legal bona fides and satisfying the norm of diversity, however, an applicant still may be recruited who shares values important to the executive. Once all applications, usually a limited number, have been submitted, a committee endorses those to be reviewed by the Ministry of Justice. The Minister of Justice also accepts the evaluation of candidates offered by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Upon 4 evaluating the candidates through interviews and reference letters, the Minister of Justice submits a recommendation, which is approved by the King in Council. The appointment process was reformed in 2002 to increase the autonomy of the Court by establishing an independent Advisory Council for the Appointment of Judges.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kunnskapsdepartementets Historie
    1814–2014 Kunnskapsdepartementets historie KIM GUNNAR HELSVIG 1811 Det Kgl. Frederiks Universitet etableres i Christiania 1814 1. departement opprettes. 1818 1. departement skifter navn til Kirke- og undervisningsdepartementet. 1821 Stortinget etablerer Oplysningsvæsenets Fond. 1826 Første lærerseminar opprettes. 1827 Lov om allmueskolen på landet. 1845 Skoleavdelingen i Kirke- og undervisningsdepartementet får konsulentstilling. 1848 Lov om allmueskolen i byene. 1851 Hartvig Nissen etablerer Selskabet til Folkeoplysningens Fremme. 1860 Lov om allmueskolen på landet. 1865 Hartvig Nissen utnevnes til den første ekspedisjonssjefen i Kirke- og undervisnings- departementets skoleavdeling. 1869 Lov om offentlige skoler for den høyere almenndannelse innfører inndelingen i 6-årig middelskole og 3-årig gymnas. 1882 Kvinner får rett til å ta examen artium. 1884 Kvinner får adgang til universitetet og dermed rett til å ta embetseksamen. 1889 Folkeskolelovene åpnet muligheten for høyere utdannelse for alle, både i byene og på landet. 1890 Kvinner får adgang til offentlige lærerskoler. Den første normalplanen for folkeskolen. 1896 Gymnaslovene etablerte en allmenn høyere skole med to hovedlinjer, real- og engelsklinjen. 1897 Norges landbrukshøgskole opprettes. 1905 Universitetet får sin egen rektor ved Lov om Det Kgl. Frederiks Universitet. 1910 Norges tekniske høgskole opprettes. 1911 Departementet nedsetter den såkalte enhetsskolekomiteen. 1912 Kristine Bonnevie blir Norges første kvinnelige professor. 1814–1914 1922 Norges lærerhøgskole opprettes. Normalplan for landsfolkeskolen. 1925 Normalplan for byfolkeskolen. 1931 Lærerorganisasjonenes skolenemnd nedsettes. 1936 Lov om folkeskolen på landet og Lov om 1940 april Rektor ved Universitetet i Oslo Didrik Arup Seip blir sjef for Kirke- folkeskolen i kjøpstedene. og undervisningsdepartementet under Administrasjonsrådet. 1940 september Professor ved Norges tekniske høgskole Ragnar Skancke blir Kirke- og undervisningsminister i Reichskommisar Terbovens nye regjering.
    [Show full text]
  • Småbrukarorganisering Og Arbeidarrørsle*)
    Tidsskrift for arbeiderbevegelsens historie, 1. 1980. Sigvart Tøsse Småbrukarorganisering og arbeidarrørsle*) I 1938 skreiv historikaren Wilhelm Keilhau at småbrukarane sin oppmarsj var «den mest bemerkede kjensgjerning i det norske jordbruks utviklingshistorie mellom 1905 og 1914».'). Eit resul­ tat av denne oppmarsjen var danninga av Norsk Småbrukerfor- bund i 1913. Artikkelen vil ta opp bakgrunnen for denne organi- sasjonsdanninga og utviklinga fram til slutten av 1920 åra. I tiåret før første verdenskrig skjedde også gjennombrotet for fagorganisasjonen og Det norske arbeiderparti. I 1912 organi­ serte skog- og landarbeidarane seg i eit eige forbund som slutta seg til Arbeidernes faglige landsorganisasjon. I Småbrukarfor- bundet dominerte folk frå Arbeidardemokratane. Den geograf­ iske basisen for begge forbunda var Austlandet, serleg Hedmark og Oppland. Småbrukarforbundet fekk ikkje den store tilslut­ ninga, men klarte seg over ei nedgangstid i 20 åra og byrjinga av 30 talet. Norsk skog- og jordbruksarbeiderforbund frå 1912 gjekk derimot i oppløysing i byrjinga av 1920 talet. Politisk var Arbeidarpartiet på frammarsj. Det store gjennombrotet på byg­ dene i Austlandet kom ved valet i 1927 som viser masseover- gang frå dei tidlegare arbeidardemokratveljarane. Eit interessant aspekt som vil bli teke opp her, er da tilhøvet mellom småbruka- rorganisasjonen og arbeidarrørsla. Men først spør vi om kvifor Norsk Småbrukerforbund blei danna, og kva var dei økonomi­ ske, sosiale og politiske føresetnadene for ein slik organisasjon? *) Artikkelen byggjer vesentleg på hovudoppgåva mi i historie-. Norsk bonde- og småbrukarlag 1913-28. Bakgrunn og verksemd. Trondheim 1976. Økonomisk og sosial bakgrunn Jordbrukstellinga i 1907 - den første serskilte jordbrukstellinga - viste store endringar frå tidlegare statistiske oversikter. Stats­ minister Gunnar Knudsen sa at tellinga opna augo hans for kor utprega eit småbruksland Norge var.
    [Show full text]
  • Centre for Peace Studies Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education
    Centre for Peace Studies Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education The portrayal of the Russian Revolution of 1917 in the Norwegian labor movement A study of the editorials of the Social-Demokraten, 1915—1923 Anzhela Atayan Master’s thesis in Peace and Conflict Transformation – SVF-3901 June 2014 ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor Kari Aga Myklebost for helpful supervision with practical advice and useful comments, the Culture and Social Sciences Library, the Centre for Peace Studies and Ola Goverud Andersson for support. iii iv Morgen mot Russlands grense Jeg kommer fra dagen igår, fra vesten, fra fortidens land. Langt fremme en solstripe går mot syd. Det er morgenens rand. I jubel flyr toget avsted. Se grensen! En linje av ild. Bak den er det gamle brendt ned. Bak den er det nye blitt til. Jeg føler forventningens sang i hjertets urolige slag. Så skulde jeg også engang få møte den nye dag! Rudolf Nilsen v vi Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………….......1 1.1.Major terms and choice of period……...………………………………………………......1 1.2.Research questions…………………………………………………………………………2 1.3.Motivation and relevance for peace studies………………………………………………..3 1.4.Three editors: presentation…………………………………………………………………3 1.5.The development of the Norwegian labor press: a short description………………………6 1.6.The position of the Norwegian labor movement in Scandinavia…………………………..7 1.7.Structure of the thesis............................................................................................................8 Chapter 2. Previous studies and historical background………………………………………11 2.1. Previous studies…………………………………………………………………………..11 2.2. Historical background……………………………………………………………………14 2.2.1. The situation in Norway…………………………………………………………...14 2.2.2. Connections between the Bolsheviks and the Norwegian left…………….……....16 Chapter 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Scandinavians at the Gates of Brussels' from <I>Vision</I>
    'The Scandinavians at the gates of Brussels' from Vision Caption: In April 1971, the Swiss monthly economic publication Vision paints a picture of the three Scandinavian countries which wish to become or are hesitant about becoming members of the European Economic Community (EEC). Source: Vision. The European Business Magazine. Dir. of publ. COVILLE, Christine; GORDEVITCH, Igor; NORALL, Frank; COLSON, Jean ; Editor HEYMANN, Philippe. April 1971, n° 5. Geneva: SEPEG. Copyright: (c) SEPEG URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/the_scandinavians_at_the_gates_of_brussels_from_vision-en-0520ab80-d121-4beb-a590- 2f7a10e296c2.html Publication date: 16/09/2012 1 / 6 16/09/2012 The Scandinavians at the gates of Brussels Denmark, Norway and Sweden are knocking at the doors of the EEC. The first two want full membership, the neutral Swedes are afraid of being left out in the cold once their EFTA partners are inside. While most Danes are for entry, many Norwegians are sceptical. They wonder what will happen to their farming and fisheries. And both countries are keen to preserve their own standards of social justice. The Swedes meanwhile want to be half in and half out. If it wants new members, the EEC will have to be flexible. Scandinavia exists. It's a fact which citizens of the EEC and of Britain or Ireland tend to forget when they talk of enlarging the Community. But two of the three Scandinavian countries, Norway and Denmark are candidates for membership, and their ties with the third, Sweden, weigh heavily on their minds as they negotiate. All three in turn have ties with Finland. And all four Nordic countries must take account of the Soviet Union, anxious as ever for the disunity of western Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • “Norway Is a Peace Nation”
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives “Norway is a Peace Nation” Discursive Preconditions for the Norwegian Peace Engagement Policy Øystein Haga Skånland M.A.Thesis, Peace and Conflict Studies Faculty of Social Science UNIVERSITY OF OSLO 20th June, 2008 ii Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor Halvard Leira for his insightful feedback, suggestions, and encouraging comments. Without him keeping me on track and gently prodding me in the right direction, carrying out the analysis would undoubtedly have been an overwhelming task. I am also grateful to Iver B. Neumann, who has read through and given valuable comments on a draft in the finishing stages of the process. I would also like to thank Prof. Jeffrey T. Checkel for an excellent introduction to social constructivism in International Relations, Prof. Werner Christie Mathisen for his course on textual analysis, and Sunniva Engh for introducing me to Norwegian development aid history. You have all inspired me in the choice of perspective and object of study. Writing this thesis would not be possible without support and encouragement to overcome the many small and big challenges I have encountered. I am indebted to my fellow students, particularly Jonathan Amario and Ruben Røsler; my friends; and my parents. Last, but not least, Synnøve deserves my most heartfelt thanks for her patience and loving support. All the viewpoints presented, and all errors and inconsistencies, are solely my own responsibility. Øystein Haga Skånland Oslo, June 2008 iii Table of Content Acknowledgements ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • "Fordelingen Av Ministerposter I Norske Koalisjonsregjeringer"
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives "Fordelingen av ministerposter i norske koalisjonsregjeringer" Sølvi Engebretsen Hovedoppgave i statsvitenskap Universitetet i Oslo 1 2 1.0. INNLEDNING 1.1. Tema og problemstilling Tema for oppgaven er fordelingen av ministerposter i koalisjonsregjeringer, og motivene som ligger bak disse fordelingene. Problemstillingen knytter seg til hvorvidt regjeringsmakt søkes for maktens egen skyld eller ut fra ønsket om å påvirke politikk i bestemte retninger - m.a.o. om partiene er maktsøkende eller policysøkende. Hvilke motiver som ligger til grunn for partiers atferd har nettopp vært det sentrale spørsmål innen koalisjonsteori. Spørsmålet er variasjoner over et gammelt tema innen statsvitenskap. For Aristoteles var politikk dels et mål i seg selv, men også en form for handling som, i likhet med etikk, bygget på kunnskap om hva som er til gode for fellesskapet. Mot dette synet står den realpolitiske retningen, blant klassikerne først og fremst representert ved Machiavelli. Her er politikk ensbetydende med kamp om posisjoner. Målet er å oppnå og beholde politisk makt - ikke “det gode liv” som hos Aristoteles. I nyere tids statsvitenskap har nok det realpolitiske synet på politikk hatt stor inn- flytelse. Rune Slagstad (1987) skriver om “realismens triumf i moderne retts- og stats- vitenskap”. Studiet av koalisjonsdannelser er intet unntak i så måte. Lenge forutsatte man at partienes motiver var ønsket om regjeringsmakt. Selv de som etterhvert har lagt vekt på forfølgelse av politiske mål som sentralt for partiers atferd, har typisk under- ordnet dette motivet i forhold til maktsøking (Budge og Laver 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • Version 2.8 (Presentert DSS)
    Concentration of power in cabinets: Exploring the importance of the political context Kristoffer Kolltveit, PhD Candidate, Department of political science, University of Oslo Abstract. Weakening of the cabinet collective and strengthening of prime ministers in parliamentary democracies have often been explained by the personality of state leaders or long-term changes like increased fragmentation of public sector, internationalisation and mediatisation of politics. This article points to other, more contingent explanations for changes in the executive centre. The argument is that the number of parties in cabinet, the fragility of the coalition, and the cabinet’s parliamentary basis, also affect the need for political coordination and thus the concentration of power in cabinet. The impact of long-term societal changes on the concentration of decision-making power in cabinet thus depends on factors in the domestic political context. The argument is substantiated through a qualitative case study of Norway. Based on semi-structured interviews the study shows that different features of cabinet help explain the concentration of power seen in the last four Norwegian cabinets. ! Note to reader: This is an early draft of the final article in my article-based PhD- thesis. One of the other articles focuses on how presidentialisation tendencies in Norwegian coalitions instead might be described as concentration of power as core ministers, party leaders and parliamentary leaders still are important actors in the decision-making processes in cabinet. In order to avoid overlap, this article has a more explanatory focus. I am therefore particularly interested in and grateful for, feedback on how this present article can be framed to further strengthen the theoretical argument of the importance of short-term explanations and interlinkage with long-term explanations, and perhaps tone down the Norwegian case more.
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker's Bios
    An Inclusive, Global Strategy to #LeaveNoOneBehind during and after COVID-19 Speaker’s Biographies Speaker Biography Danilo Türk President of Slovenia Danilo Türk (1952) has a BA in Law from the University of (2007-2012) Ljubljana in 1975, an MA from the University of Belgrade Club de Madrid President (1978), and a PhD from the University of Ljubljana. In 1983 he became Director of the Institute on International Law at the University of Ljubljana. He was member of the Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, a UN body of independent experts. In that capacity he served, in 1986- 1992, as the UN Special Rapporteur on the realisation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. In 996-1997 he also served as member of the Human Rights Committee. In 1990-1991 he took part in the drafting of the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia by preparing the draft chapter of the Constitution related to human rights and fundamental freedoms. From 1992 to 2000, Mr. Türk was the first Slovene Permanent Representative to the UN in New York and represented Slovenia on the UN Security Council in 1998 - 1999. In 2000 he was invited by Mr. Kofi Annan, the then Secretary –General of the UN, to serve as UN Assistant Secretary-General for Political Affairs (2000 – 20005). In 2005 he returned to Slovenia as Vice-Dean of the Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana. In 2007 he was elected President of the Republic of Slovenia from 2007 to 2012. He became member of the Club de Madrid in 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Stortinget Stemmerett for Kvinner
    Utsnitt av lovforslag, komite-innstillinger og debatter i Stortinget om Stemmerett for kvinner 17. mai 1814-11. juni 1913 AlS O. FREDR. ARNESEN BOK- OG AKCIDENSTRYKKERI Takk I 1963 er det 50 år sidan kvinnene i Norge fekk ålmen stemmerett. I samband med dette jubileet vil forslag, innstillinger og ordskiftene om kvinnestemme­ retten bli plukka ut av Stortingstidende og trykt i eit hefte. Etter oppmoding frå oss kvinner som i dag er medlemmer av Stortinget har Stortingets presidentskap gjeve tilsagn om at heftet blir trykt for Stortingets rekning. Me er svært glade for dette, og vil gjerne få bere fram ei djup takk til Stortingets presidentskap. Me ser det som ei stor ære at Stortinget trykker nettopp dette heftet. Me vil også takke Stortingets kontorsjef, herr Gunnar Hoff, for gode råd og rettleiing - og me takker stortingsbibliotekarane Olaf Torp og Kjell Frank, tenestemennene ved Stortings­ biblioteket og arkivar Tor Kindingsland for verdfull hjelp med å finne fram stoffet. Til sist - .men ikkje minst - vil me takke statsautorisert revisor Eva Kolstad for arbeidet med å plukke ut og redigere stoffet. Det har vare mykje arbeid. Oslo, den 4. april 1963. Magnhild Hagelia. Berte Rognerud. Martha Johannessen. Rakel Seweriin. Hanna Berg Angel!. Liv Tomter. Haldis Tjernsberg. Margith Munkebye. Gu,ri Johannessen. Gunvor Eker. Aase Lionæs. Karen Grønn-Hagen. Margit Tøsdal. Jenny Lund. Sunniva Hakestad-Møller. Forord Kvinnestemmerettens historie, slik den formet seg innen Stortingets vegger, fyller mange hundre sider i Stortingstidende. Her er dokumentene plukket fram og kuttet ned så stoffet kan rommes i et hefte av overkommelig størrelse. Der ord, setninger, avsnitt eller hele innlegg er klippet bort, er det markert med - - - - eller med henvisninger.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Needs Norwegians?" Explaining the Oslo Back Channel: Norway’S Political Past in the Middle East
    Evaluation Report 9/2000 Hilde Henriksen Waage "Norwegians? Who needs Norwegians?" Explaining the Oslo Back Channel: Norway’s Political Past in the Middle East A report prepared by PRIO International Peace Research Institute, Oslo Institutt for fredsforskning Responsibility for the contents and presentation of findings and recommendations rests with the author. The views and opinions expressed in the report do not necessarily correspond with the views of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Preface In September 1998, I was commissioned by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs to carry out a preliminary study looking into Norway’s role in the Middle East. According to the agreement with the Ministry, the study should focus on the years prior to 1993 and examine whether Norway’s political past in the Middle East – and, not least, the mediating and confidence-building efforts of Norwegians prior to the opening of the secret Oslo Back Channel – had had any influence on the process that followed. The study should also try to answer the question ‘Why Norway?’ – that is, what had made Norway, of all countries, suitable for such an extraordinary task? The work on the study started on 15 September 1998. The date of submission was stipulated as 15 April 2000. This was achieved. The following report is based on recently declassified and partly still classified documents (to which I was granted access) at the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the verbatim records of the Parliamentary Foreign Affairs Committee, records of government proceedings and the Norwegian Parliament, Labour Party Archives, documents from the US State Department and the Socialist International – to mention the most important.
    [Show full text]
  • Samvirkebeskatningen I Norge På 1900-Tallet
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives Samvirkebeskatningen i Norge på 1900-tallet En historisk analyse av den politiske debatten, regelverket og ligningspraksis med hovedvekt på landbrukssamvirke og forbrukerkooperasjonen av Harald Espeli Forskningsrapport 2/2003 Handelshøyskolen BI Institutt for innovasjon og økonomisk organisering Senter for samvirkeforskning Harald Espeli: Samvirkebeskatningen i Norge på 1900-tallet. En historisk analyse av den politiske debatten, regelverket og ligningspraksis med hovedvekt på landbrukssamvirke og forbrukerkooperasjonen. Harald Espeli 2003 Forskningsrapport 2/2003 ISSN: 0803-2610 Handelshøyskolen BI P.b. 580 1302 Sandvika Tlf: 67 55 70 00 www.bi.no Rapporten kan bestilles fra: Norli, avd. Sandvika Telefon: +47 67 55 74 51 Fax: +47 67 55 74 50 Mail: [email protected] 2 Sammendrag og forord Utfra en historiefaglig synsvinkel beskriver og analyserer rapporten utvik- lingen av norsk samvirkebeskatning fra slutten av 1800-tallet og frem til en høyesterettsdom i 2001. Skattelovene av 1911 innebar at samvirkeforetak innen jordbrukssektoren og forbruksforeninger (kooperasjonen) ble under- lagt et særskilt skatteregime frem til skattereformen i 1992. Skatteregimet ble utvidet til fiskerisamvirke i 1931 og salgssamvirke i skogbruket i 1949. Skatteregimet innebar at samvirkeforetak innenfor disse sektorer ble prosent- lignet, ikke regnskapslignet som andre foretak. Prosentligningen innebar at skattbar inntekt ble fastsatt til en viss andel av samvirkeforetakets skattbare formue. Den særskilte skattleggingen av samvirke var motivert utfra et politisk ønske om å fremme organisasjonsformen innenfor utvalgte deler av økonomien på begynnelsen av 1900-tallet. Samtidig erkjente politikerne at ordinær regn- skapsligning ikke uten videre kunne benytte i skattleggingen av samvirke- foretak på grunn av organisasjonsformens særpreg.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy of Minority Governments
    Indiana Journal of Constitutional Design Volume 3 Article 1 10-17-2018 Taxonomy of Minority Governments Lisa La Fornara [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijcd Part of the Administrative Law Commons, American Politics Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Comparative Politics Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, International Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Legislation Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, Rule of Law Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation La Fornara, Lisa (2018) "Taxonomy of Minority Governments," Indiana Journal of Constitutional Design: Vol. 3 , Article 1. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijcd/vol3/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Journal of Constitutional Design by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Taxonomy of Minority Governments LISA LA FORNARA INTRODUCTION A minority government in its most basic form is a government in which the party holding the most parliamentary seats still has fewer than half the seats in parliament and therefore cannot pass legislation or advance policy without support from unaffiliated parties.1 Because seats in minority parliaments are more evenly distributed amongst multiple parties, opposition parties have greater opportunity to block legislation. A minority government must therefore negotiate with external parties and adjust its policies to garner the majority of votes required to advance its initiatives.2 This paper serves as a taxonomy of minority governments in recent history and proceeds in three parts.
    [Show full text]