United Nations petition — incomplete report Date: April ……. , 2009 Plaintiff: Surname: Winther First names: Wilhelm Werner Gender: Male Birthplace/-date: NO-Ålesund — May 17, 1963 Nationality: Norwegian Present address: Åsen 4, NO-6270 Brattvåg, Norway Contact information: Norwegian authorities should send their communications/representatives etc to my counsellor in NO-Ålesund, Mr Johs. A ASPEHAUG (P.O Box 837, 6001 Ålesund [PRV: Kipervikg. 5 — ―Grimmergården‖ — Ålesund]). Due to persistent, dangerous and totally illegal harassment and interference from Norwegian authorities, representatives from foreign governments, human rights organizations and tribunals etc should apply couriers satisfyingly identifying themselves as authentic messengers — no letters should be forwarded through, e.g, the official postal services of Norway (i.e ―Posten Norge BA‖) or DHL, and no confidential information should be transferred by telecommunication or direct consultation with aforesaid counsellor (Mr Aspehaug is trustworthy enough, but his office etc ‘ve been unlawfully surveilled by Norwegian author- ities for years). Norwegian authorities are much likely to v.g; obstruct phone calls, steal telefac- similes/letters, erase e-mails and to bug/surveil/eavesdrop clothes, luggage, PCs, calculators, cellular phones, hotel rooms, restaurants, shops, public health facili- ties, libraries, closed sessions, cars/taxicabs, parks and — pet animals etc. 1 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 1 by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Accused: Name: The Kingdom of Norway. Leading members of the Norwegian Courts of Appeal, Odelsting, Lagting, Inter- locutory Appeals Committee of the Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Court of Impeachment, and Council of State item principal representatives of corre- sponding royal house, conciliation courts, city courts and rural district courts are all amongst those explicitly culpable in this case — in addition to the Director General of Public Prosecutions and various public prosecutors, military officers, chiefs of police, police station chief inspectors, district recorders, physicians, nurses, ambulance drivers, psychologists, social security/welfare officers and state employed engineers item members of the Norwegian Ministry of Justice, Department of Health and Social Security, Parliament and Government etc. Comments on disqualification: Nearby complaint is handed over to the sheriff office in NO-Brattvåg, Norway — cf the Norwegian Criminal Procedure Act sec 223, first period. Said office has a central position as legally charged in this case. As regards corresponding disqualification etc of various police authorities, the district recorders, public prosecutors, Director General of Public Prosecutions, conciliation courts, city courts, rural district courts, Courts of Appeal, Odelsting, Interlocutory Appeals Committee of the Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Court of Impeachment and royal house etc, cf; the Norwegian Public Administration Act sec‘s 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9 and 10; the Norwegian Courts of Justice Act sec‘s 1, 2:b, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26:a, 33:a, 33:b, 52, 53, 60, 65, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120 and 121; the Norwegian Constitution sec‘s 1, 3, 5, 9, 12, 13, 21, 25, 26, 28, 30, 31, 40, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 83, 86, 87, 88, 93, 102, 110:b and 110:c; enclosed Documents ##103, 108, 115, 135, 147, 161, 214, 240, 315, 339, 377, 599, 627, 633, 1536, 2037, 2418, 2907, 3217, 3611, 4000, 4318, 4502, 4575, 4588, 5007, 5817, 6009, 6078, 6097, 7011, 7084, 7090, 8017, 8123, 8168, 8197, 9045, and 9080, item Aphorisms &c ##1–166. 2 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report In section 2 of the Norwegian ―Human Rights Act‖ of May 21, 1999, it is expli- citly laid down that the Council of Europe‘s ―Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms‖ (the ―European Convention on Human Rights‖), the ―Universal Declaration of Human Rights‖ as well as the United Nations‘ ―International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights‖ are fully applicable as Norwegian law, and in sec 3 ib it‘s brought home that provisions confirmed through conventions and protocols mentioned in sec 2 in case of controversy are prior to other legislation. Hence — with respect to said disqualification(-s) etc — the following Articles of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Free- doms, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights item the International Cove- nant on Civil and Political Rights are brought into legal force in adjacent case: ―CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS‖ Article 13: Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity. Article 14: The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status. Article 17: Nothing in this Convention may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the Conventio n. 3 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 3 by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Article 18: The restrictions permitted under this Convention to the said rights and freedoms shall not be applied for any purpose other than those for which they have been prescribed. ―THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS‖ Article 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Decla- ration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or terri- tory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self- governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. Article 6: Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law. Article 7: All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination. 4 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 4 by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Article 8: Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law. Article 10: Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him. Article 28: Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized. Article 29 (3): These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations. Article 30: Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein. ―INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS‖ TSVP! 5 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 5 by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Article 2 (1): Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to respect and to ensure to all individuals within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction the rights recognized in the present Covenant, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Article 2 (3): Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes: (a) To ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violated shall have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity; (b) To ensure that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his right thereto determined by competent judicial, administrative or legislative authorities, or by any other competent authority provided for by the legal system of the State, and to develop the possibilities of judicial remedy; (c) To ensure that the competent authorities shall enforce such remedies when granted. Article 3: The State Parties to the present Covenant undertake to ensure the equal right of men and women to the enjoyment of all civil and political rights set forth in the present Covenant. Article 5 (1): Nothing in the present Covenant may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms recognized herein or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the present Covenant. 6 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 6 by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Article 5 (2): There shall be no restriction upon or derogation from any of the funda- mental human rights recognized or existing in any State Party to the present Covenant pursuant to law, conventions, regulations or custom on the pretext that the present Covenant does not recognize such rights or that it recognizes them to a lesser extent.