Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Volume II
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
PAPERS in NEW GUINEA LINGUISTICS No. 18
PACIFIC LINGUISTICS S e.ft-<- e..6 A - No. 4 0 PAPERS IN NEW GUINEA LINGUISTICS No. 18 by R. Conrad and W. Dye N.P. Thomson L.P. Bruce, Jr. Department of Linguistics Research School of Pacific Studies THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Conrad, R., Dye, W., Thomson, N. and Bruce Jr., L. editors. Papers in New Guinea Linguistics No. 18. A-40, iv + 106 pages. Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University, 1975. DOI:10.15144/PL-A40.cover ©1975 Pacific Linguistics and/or the author(s). Online edition licensed 2015 CC BY-SA 4.0, with permission of PL. A sealang.net/CRCL initiative. PACIFIC LINGUISTICS is published by the Ling ui��ic Ci�cl e 06 Canbe��a and consists of four series: SERIES A - OCCAS IONAL PAPERS SERIES B - MONOGRAPHS SERIES C - BOOKS SERIES V - SPECIAL PUBLICATIONS . EDITOR: S.A. Wurm . ASSOCIATE EDITORS: D.C. Laycock , C.L. Voorhoeve . ALL CORRESPONDENCE concerning PACIFIC LINGUISTICS, including orders and subscriptions, should be addressed to: The Secretary, PACIFIC LINGUISTICS, Department of Linguistics, School of Pacific Studies, The Australian National University, Canberra , A.C.T. 2600. Australia . Copyright � The Authors. First published 1975 . The editors are indebted to the Australian National University for help in the production of this series. This publication was made possible by an initial grant from the Hunter Douglas Fund. National Library of Australia Card Number and ISBN 0 85883 118 X TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SOME LANGUAGE RELATIONSHIPS IN THE UPPER SEPIK REGION OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA, by Robert Conrad and Wayne Dye 1 O. INTRODUCTION 1 1 . -
The Status of the Least Documented Language Families in the World
Vol. 4 (2010), pp. 177-212 http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/ldc/ http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4478 The status of the least documented language families in the world Harald Hammarström Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen and Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig This paper aims to list all known language families that are not yet extinct and all of whose member languages are very poorly documented, i.e., less than a sketch grammar’s worth of data has been collected. It explains what constitutes a valid family, what amount and kinds of documentary data are sufficient, when a language is considered extinct, and more. It is hoped that the survey will be useful in setting priorities for documenta- tion fieldwork, in particular for those documentation efforts whose underlying goal is to understand linguistic diversity. 1. InTroducTIon. There are several legitimate reasons for pursuing language documen- tation (cf. Krauss 2007 for a fuller discussion).1 Perhaps the most important reason is for the benefit of the speaker community itself (see Voort 2007 for some clear examples). Another reason is that it contributes to linguistic theory: if we understand the limits and distribution of diversity of the world’s languages, we can formulate and provide evidence for statements about the nature of language (Brenzinger 2007; Hyman 2003; Evans 2009; Harrison 2007). From the latter perspective, it is especially interesting to document lan- guages that are the most divergent from ones that are well-documented—in other words, those that belong to unrelated families. I have conducted a survey of the documentation of the language families of the world, and in this paper, I will list the least-documented ones. -
Integration and Differentiation As Distinct Dimensions of Personality
W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2015 Integration and Differentiation as Distinct Dimensions of Personality Victoria Claire Oleynick College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Personality and Social Contexts Commons Recommended Citation Oleynick, Victoria Claire, "Integration and Differentiation as Distinct Dimensions of Personality" (2015). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539626810. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-3tag-gx47 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Integration and Differentiation as Distinct Dimensions of Personality Victoria Claire Oleynick Broomall, Pennsylvania Bachelor of Arts, Lehigh University, 2010 A Thesis presented to the Graduate Faculty of the College of William and Mary in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of Psychology The College of William and Mary APPROVAL PAGE This Thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts A j C (H jj. AWr [l Victoria Claire Oleynick P* Approved by the Committee, July, 2015 JA/L Committee Chair Dr. Todd M. Thrash College of William and Mary \ L0r Jpanna Sfchug Ccylege of WLIJ&m and Mary Dr. D anielle Dallaire College of William and Mary COMPLIANCE PAGE Research approved by The Protection of Human Subjects Committee (PHSC) Protocol number(s): PHSC-2015-04-08-10340-tmthra PHSC-2014-10-02-9830-tmthra PHSC-2015-03-25-10299-tmthra Date(s) of approval: 4/23/2015 10/5/2014 4/3/2015 ABSTRACT Despite longstanding interest in integration and differentiation, these constructs have not been formally conceptualized and measured as dimensions of personality. -
Philological Sciences. Linguistics” / Journal of Language Relationship Issue 3 (2010)
Российский государственный гуманитарный университет Russian State University for the Humanities RGGU BULLETIN № 5/10 Scientific Journal Series “Philological Sciences. Linguistics” / Journal of Language Relationship Issue 3 (2010) Moscow 2010 ВЕСТНИК РГГУ № 5/10 Научный журнал Серия «Филологические науки. Языкознание» / «Вопросы языкового родства» Выпуск 3 (2010) Москва 2010 УДК 81(05) ББК 81я5 Главный редактор Е.И. Пивовар Заместитель главного редактора Д.П. Бак Ответственный секретарь Б.Г. Власов Главный художник В.В. Сурков Редакционный совет серии «Филологические науки. Языкознание» / «Вопросы языкового родства» Председатель Вяч. Вс. Иванов (Москва – Лос-Анджелес) М. Е. Алексеев (Москва) В. Блажек (Брно) У. Бэкстер (Анн Арбор) В. Ф. Выдрин (Санкт-Петербург) М. Гелл-Манн (Санта Фе) А. Б. Долгопольский (Хайфа) Ф. Кортландт (Лейден) А. Лубоцкий (Лейден) Редакционная коллегия серии: В. А. Дыбо (главный редактор) Г. С. Старостин (заместитель главного редактора) Т. А. Михайлова (ответственный секретарь) К. В. Бабаев С. Г. Болотов А. В. Дыбо О. А. Мудрак В. Е. Чернов ISSN 1998-6769 © Российский государственный гуманитарный университет, 2010 УДК 81(05) ББК 81я5 Вопросы языкового родства: Международный научный журнал / Рос. гос. гуманитар. ун-т; Рос. Акад. наук. Ин-т языкознания; под ред. В. А. Дыбо. ― М., 2010. ― № 3. ― X + 176 с. ― (Вестник РГГУ: Научный журнал; Серия «Филологические науки. Языко- знание»; № 05/10). Journal of Language Relationship: International Scientific Periodical / Russian State Uni- versity for the Humanities; Russian Academy of Sciences. Institute of Linguistics; Ed. by V. A. Dybo. ― Moscow, 2010. ― Nº 3. ― X + 176 p. ― (RSUH Bulletin: Scientific Periodical; Linguistics Series; Nº 05/10). ISSN 1998-6769 http ://journal.nostratic.ru [email protected] Дополнительные знаки: С. -
The Cambridge Handbook of African Linguistics Edited by H
Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-40618-5 — The Cambridge Handbook of African Linguistics Edited by H. Ekkehard Wolff Index More Information Index Note: Pages numbers in italics refer to figures and tables Khung. See Xuun adjective, 170, 171, 194, 195, 217, 219, 221, 223, Kora. See Ora(-Xin) 268, 279, 298, 308, 312, 316, 321, 322, ǃXóõ. See Xoonǃ 398, 400, 402, 404–407, 409, 411–415, ǃXun, 176,ǃ 187 453, 459, 517, 526 ǃOra-Xiri†,ǃ 108, 385, 400 Adlam, 569 ǃUi, 168, 184, 385, 387, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 407, Adona, 249 ǃ 412, 413 Afade, 271 ǃXoon, 113, 114, 385, 392, 401, 402, 403, 406, Afar, 73, 74, 249, 259, 299, 302, 306, 308, 578, 407, 412 590 ǃXuun, 110, 176, 187, 385 affricate, 198, 273, 301, 347, 390, 391 ’Auni, 385 Afghanistan, 558 ’Nǃ ǀoha, 385 Afitti, 359, 361, 365, 378 ǀHaasi, 385 Afrasian. See Afroasiatic ǀXaise, 385 Africa (geographic, regional), 3–15, 17–29, 33, ǀXam, 110, 385, 403, 405 37, 39, 40, 43–45, 47–49, 51–53, 55, 56, /xam-ka- e. See ǀXam 59, 67, 68, 70, 73, 86, 87, 90, 94, 96, 98, ǁAni, 385, 400 101, 106, 109, 110, 117, 119, 121, 124, ǁXo, 385 ǃ 125, 128, 130–132, 135, 149, 152, 160, ǁXom, 385 161, 165–172, 174, 176, 179–181, 183, ǂ’Amkoe, 385, 386, 388, 395, 405, 406, 407, 414 184, 187–190, 212, 213, 215, 243–248, ǂAakhoe, 385, 386, 401, 410 250–252, 254, 262, 265, 299, 385, 419– ǂHoan, 385, 405, 407, 414, 415 423, 426, 428, 429, 431–436, 439–447, ǂKx’aoǁ’ae, 385, 415 450, 455, 457, 458, 463–472, 478, 482– 484, 487, 488, 491, 492, 503, 512–515, Aari, 298, 304, 307 518, 523–525, 531–533, 535, 536, 538, Aasax, -
Nilo-Saharan’
11 Linguistic Features and Typologies in Languages Commonly Referred to as ‘Nilo-Saharan’ Gerrit J. Dimmendaal, Colleen Ahland, Angelika Jakobi, and Constance Kutsch Lojenga 11.1 Introduction The phylum referred to today as Nilo- Saharan (occasionally also Nilosaharan) was established by Greenberg (1963). It consists of a core of language families already argued to be genetically related in his earlier classiication of African languages (Greenberg 1955:110–114), consisting of Eastern Sudanic, Central Sudanic, Kunama, and Berta, and grouped under the name Macrosudanic; this language family was renamed Chari- Nile in his 1963 contribution after a suggestion by the Africanist William Welmers. In his 1963 classiication, Greenberg hypothesized that Nilo- Saharan consists of Chari- Nile and ive other languages or language fam- ilies treated as independent units in his earlier study: Songhay (Songhai), Saharan, Maban, Fur, and Koman (Coman). Bender (1997) also included the Kadu languages in Sudan in his sur- vey of Nilo-Saharan languages; these were classiied as members of the Kordofanian branch of Niger-Kordofanian by Greenberg (1963) under the name Tumtum. Although some progress has been made in our knowledge of the Kadu languages, they remain relatively poorly studied, and there- fore they are not further discussed here, also because actual historical evi- dence for their Nilo- Saharan afiliation is rather weak. Whereas there is a core of language groups now widely assumed to belong to Nilo- Saharan as a phylum or macro- family, the genetic afiliation of families such as Koman and Songhay is also disputed (as for the Kadu languages). For this reason, these latter groups are discussed separately from what is widely considered to form the core of Nilo- Saharan, Central Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. -
Survey of the World's Languages
Survey of the world’s languages The languages of the world can be divided into a number of families of related languages, possibly grouped into larger stocks, plus a residue of isolates, languages that appear not to be genetically related to any other known languages, languages that form one-member families on their own. The number of families, stocks, and isolates is hotly disputed. The disagreements centre around differences of opinion as to what constitutes a family or stock, as well as the acceptable criteria and methods for establishing them. Linguists are sometimes divided into lumpers and splitters according to whether they lump many languages together into large stocks, or divide them into numerous smaller family groups. Merritt Ruhlen is an extreme lumper: in his classification of the world’s languages (1991) he identifies just nineteen language families or stocks, and five isolates. More towards the splitting end is Ethnologue, the 18th edition of which identifies some 141 top-level genetic groupings. In addition, it distinguishes 1 constructed language, 88 creoles, 137 or 138 deaf sign languages (the figures differ in different places, and this category actually includes alternate sign languages — see also website for Chapter 12), 75 language isolates, 21 mixed languages, 13 pidgins, and 51 unclassified languages. Even so, in terms of what has actually been established by application of the comparative method, the Ethnologue system is wildly lumping! Some families, for instance Austronesian and Indo-European, are well established, and few serious doubts exist as to their genetic unity. Others are quite contentious. Both Ruhlen (1991) and Ethnologue identify an Australian family, although there is as yet no firm evidence that the languages of the continent are all genetically related. -
The Evolution of Linguistic Diversity
The Evolution of Linguistic Diversity Daniel Nettle Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD University College London 1996 ProQuest Number: 10044366 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10044366 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ABSTRACT This thesis examines the causes and consequences of diversity in human language. It is divided into three sections, each of which addresses a different aspect of the topic. The first section uses computer simulations to examine various mechanisms which may produce diversity in language: imperfect learning, geographical isolation, selection on the basis of social affiliation, and functional selection amongst linguistic variants. It is concluded that social and functional selection by speakers provide the main motive forces for the divergence of languages. The second section examines the factors influencing the geographical distribution of languages in the world. By far the most important is the ecological regime in which people live. Seasonal climates produce large ethnolinguistic groups because people form large networks of exchange to mitigate the subsistence risk to which they are exposed. -
Astrology and Race: Aspects of Equality After Critical Race Theory
2012 COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF RACE AND LAW 267 ASTROLOGY AND RACE: ASPECTS OF EQUALITY AFTER CRITICAL RACE THEORY GIANFRANCESCO ZANETTI Historically, Critical Race Theory (CRT) has been neglected in European legal scholarship. CRT approaches promise to be a useful avenue for European jurisprudence, however, as European nations rapidly become more multiracial. The focus of this Essay is on the theoretical value that radiates from some Critical Race Theory lines of thought, written from the perspective of an Italian legal scholar engaging in CRT. In particular, there are some aspects of CRT jurisprudence that are valuable from a general, legal-philosophical, point of view. In this vein, CRT scholars have authored scholarship that has had an impact on the traditional, liberal notion of equality. An apparently reasonable jurisprudence has been seen to revolve around a pseudo-scientific array of notions (―neutral‖ races, conceived as zodiac signs) that are lacking any sound epistemic ground: therefore, a form of astrology. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 267 I. POLITICS AND RACE............................................................................... 269 II. EQUALITY AND RACE............................................................................. 272 III. FURTHER EQUALITIES.......................................................................... 275 IV. FINAL REMARKS....................................................................................... 277 INTRODUCTION Critical Race Theory (CRT) is not well known in Europe, to put it mildly. There are several reasons for the demonstrable lack of interest that European scholars have displayed for this specific brand of so-called ―post-modern jurisprudence.‖1 One of the reasons for this phenomenon is, of course, the simple fact that, in Europe, the issue of ―race‖ 2 and law has always been seen from the point of view Professor, Department of Legal Studies - University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy. -
1995 ORTESOL Journal 16
THE ORTESOL J OURNAL Oregon Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages Volume 16 1995 The ORTESOL Journal Editors Kathryn Harris Stephen Stoynoff Portland State University Oregon Stale University Editorial Board Peggy Dame Suzanne Griffin University of Oregon South Seattle Community College Gisela Ernst Ernest Hall Washington Slate University University of British Columbia Mary Fulton Deborah Healey Portland Public Schools Oregon State University Molly Williams Clackamas Community College Journal or the Oregon Teachers of English to Speakers or Other Languages Volume 16 1995 ORTESOL is a not-for-profit organization whose purposes are to raise the level of professional instruction in TESOL by providing opportunities for discussing, studying, and sharing information about TESOL and Bilingual Education, and to cooperate in appropriate ways with other groups having similar concerns. Benefits of membership include all issues of 1he ORTESOL Newsleller and 1he ORTESOL Journal, special members' rates for the annual Fall and Spring ORTESOL Conferences, and a variety of olher services and opportunities for professional development. ORTESOLJournal subscription and advertising information may be obtained by writing to the Editor, 1he ORTESOL Journal, Department of Applied Linguistics, Portland State University, PO Box 751, Portland, OR 97207. Copyright o 1995 Oregon Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages Credits: Prepared by Pali Sluys Printing/binding by Oregon State University THE ORTESOL JOURNAL Volume 16, 1995 Articles Developing ESL Programs for a Rural Community: A Needs Analysis of Latino Immigrants in Jefferson, Oregon 1 Terry Camacho-Dickey A Teaching Technique for the Definite Article in English 19 Diane Tehrani The ESL-Academic Performance Relationship 39 Coleman South Teaching Notes Summary Writing 63 Kay M. -
LCSH Section K
K., Rupert (Fictitious character) K-TEA (Achievement test) Kʻa-la-kʻun-lun kung lu (China and Pakistan) USE Rupert (Fictitious character : Laporte) USE Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement USE Karakoram Highway (China and Pakistan) K-4 PRR 1361 (Steam locomotive) K-theory Ka Lae o Kilauea (Hawaii) USE 1361 K4 (Steam locomotive) [QA612.33] USE Kilauea Point (Hawaii) K-9 (Fictitious character) (Not Subd Geog) BT Algebraic topology Ka Lang (Vietnamese people) UF K-Nine (Fictitious character) Homology theory USE Giẻ Triêng (Vietnamese people) K9 (Fictitious character) NT Whitehead groups Ka nanʻʺ (Burmese people) (May Subd Geog) K 37 (Military aircraft) K. Tzetnik Award in Holocaust Literature [DS528.2.K2] USE Junkers K 37 (Military aircraft) UF Ka-Tzetnik Award UF Ka tūʺ (Burmese people) K 98 k (Rifle) Peras Ḳ. Tseṭniḳ BT Ethnology—Burma USE Mauser K98k rifle Peras Ḳatseṭniḳ ʾKa nao dialect (May Subd Geog) K.A.L. Flight 007 Incident, 1983 BT Literary prizes—Israel BT China—Languages USE Korean Air Lines Incident, 1983 K2 (Pakistan : Mountain) Hmong language K.A. Lind Honorary Award UF Dapsang (Pakistan) Ka nō (Burmese people) USE Moderna museets vänners skulpturpris Godwin Austen, Mount (Pakistan) USE Tha noʹ (Burmese people) K.A. Linds hederspris Gogir Feng (Pakistan) Ka Rang (Southeast Asian people) USE Moderna museets vänners skulpturpris Mount Godwin Austen (Pakistan) USE Sedang (Southeast Asian people) K-ABC (Intelligence test) BT Mountains—Pakistan Kā Roimata o Hine Hukatere (N.Z.) USE Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children Karakoram Range USE Franz Josef Glacier/Kā Roimata o Hine K-B Bridge (Palau) K2 (Drug) Hukatere (N.Z.) USE Koro-Babeldaod Bridge (Palau) USE Synthetic marijuana Ka-taw K-BIT (Intelligence test) K3 (Pakistan and China : Mountain) USE Takraw USE Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test USE Broad Peak (Pakistan and China) Ka Tawng Luang (Southeast Asian people) K. -
DOI: 10.1126/Science.1165915 , 1496 (2009); 326 Science Et Al. Jim
Lumpers and Splitters: Darwin, Hooker, and the Search for Order Jim Endersby, et al. Science 326, 1496 (2009); DOI: 10.1126/science.1165915 The following resources related to this article are available online at www.sciencemag.org (this information is current as of December 11, 2009 ): Updated information and services, including high-resolution figures, can be found in the online version of this article at: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/326/5959/1496 This article appears in the following subject collections: History and Philosophy of Science http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/collection/sci_history_philo Information about obtaining reprints of this article or about obtaining permission to reproduce this article in whole or in part can be found at: http://www.sciencemag.org/about/permissions.dtl on December 11, 2009 www.sciencemag.org Downloaded from Science (print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published weekly, except the last week in December, by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. Copyright 2009 by the American Association for the Advancement of Science; all rights reserved. The title Science is a registered trademark of AAAS. REVIEW half-pay from the Admiralty while he wrote up the results of his expedition. Yet despite this assistance, Joseph Hooker spent over a decade Lumpers and Splitters: Darwin, searching for a scientific position that was both bet- ter remunerated and more prestigious than teaching Hooker, and the Search for Order medical students. As the ship sailed homeward, Hooker analyzed his future prospects in a letter to his father, noting Jim Endersby that “I am not independent, and must not be too proud; if I cannot be a naturalist with a fortune, I Classification was a key practice of the natural history sciences in the early 19th century, but leading must not be too vain to take honourable compen- taxonomists disagreed over basic matters, such as how many species the British flora contained.