DOCSLIB.ORG

Vorderasiati E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vorderasiati E Vorderasiati e BegrOndet von E. Ebeling und B. Meissner fortgefOhrt von E. Weidner, W. von Soden und D. O. Edzard herausgegeben von M. P. Streck unter Mitwirkung von G. Frantz-Szab6 . M. Krebernik . D. Morandi Bonacossi J. N. Postgate . U. Seidl· M. Stol . G. Wilhelm Redaktion S. Ecklin . S. Pfaffinger Band 13 . 3./4. Lieferung Steuer. E - Susa. B 2012 Sonderdruck ~ ________________D_e __ G_ru_y_te_r _________________! SUMER, GESCHICHTE 297 Soldt 2005, 316-332. - Sallaberger W. 1997: southern Babylonia was excavated at Tall Nippur als religioses Zentrum Mesopotamiens h im historischen Wandel, in: G. Wilhelm (ed.), Die al-'UwailI" and was dated to the i milL orientalische Stadt: Kontinuitat, Wandel, Bruch in its lowest levels. Older settled life in this (= CDOG 1),147-168. - van Soldt W. H. (ed.) part of Mesopotamia could have been cov­ 20°5: Ethnicity in ancient Mesopotamia (= ered by alluvium, or was perhaps almost CRRAI 48 = PIHANS 102). - Steiner G. 2005: Gibt es ein vor-sumerisches Substrat im sudlichen nonexistent due to difficult environmental Mesopotamien?, in: van Soldt 20°5, 340-355.­ conditions. Tall al-'UwaiII belonged to the Streck M. P. 1998: The tense systems in the so-called 'Ubaid period (ih to 4th mill.), Sumerian-Akkadian linguistic area, AS] 20, 181- also attested, e. g., at Tall al-'Ubaid *, Ur" 199. - Tuna O. N. :1990: Sumer ve Turk dilleri­ nin tarihi ilgisi ile Turk dili'nin ya§l meselesi (= and Eridu". Urbanization and agriculture Turk Dil Kurumu Yaymlan 56:1). - Whittaker significantly developed during its second G. 2005: The Sumerian Question: reviewing the phase, when an expansion - perhaps of issues, in: van Soldt 2005, 409-429. - Wilcke commercial nature - to other areas of the C. 1974: Zum Konigtum in der Ur III-Zeit, in: P. Garelli (ed.), Le palais et la royaute (= CRRAI Middle East preceded the Uruk period. 19), :177-232; id 2005: ED Lil A und die Sprache(n) der archaischen Texte, in: van Soldt § 3. The Uruk and Gamdat Na~r 200 0 5,43 -445. period. The Uruk (or Proto-urban) period, ]. S. Cooper named after the city of Uruk*, lasted for about 1000 years (ca. 4100-3100). It wit­ Sumer, Geschichte. nessed important changes in southern Mesopotamia: cities increased in number § :1. The concept of Sumer. - § :lv. The 'Ubaid period. - § 3. The Uruk and Gamdat Na~r and size, being particularly remarkable the period. - § 4. The Early Dynastic period and growth of Uruk and its surrounding region First Dynasty of Lagas. - § 5. The Sargonic during the Late Uruk period (ca. 3500- period. - § 6. The Gutian period. - § 7. The Sec­ ond Dynasty of Lagas. - § 8. The Third Dynasty 3100); the economic, social, and political of Ur. structure of the city grew in complexity, leading to a deeper integration with the § 1. The concept of Sumer as an ob­ surrounding secondary settlements; and ac­ ject of historical research depends on dif­ counting techniques developed into the cu­ ferent linguistic, political or cultural ap­ neiform writing system (Keilschrift"), first proaches, which have changed through the attested around 3200-3100 on the day last decades. On the other hand, the associ­ tablets found in the level IVa of the Eanna ation of Sumerians with Sum. speakers, sequence at Uruk. People from this city, in the identification of the Sum. language in ventures of probably commercial purposes, proto-cuneiform texts, and the problem of established deep cultural contacts with ter­ "whence and when did the Sumerians ar­ ritories of southern Mesopotamia, Susiana, rive in Babylonia" are also issues contem­ and Upper Mesopotamia, reached eastern plated in discussions (see Sumer*, Sume­ Anatolia, northern and western Syria, and risch § 6). All these matters are relevant to possibly Egypt, and even colonized the re­ define the chronological and geographical gion of the Middle Euphrates (Babuba *; frame where the history of S. developed. S. Iran", Vorgeschichte § 4; Tiirkei Vorge­ will be here identified with southern Baby­ *, lonia (Babylonien"), in a similar sense as schichte). This so-called "Uruk expansion", the term ki-en-gi(r) (Akk. sumerum) was which stimulated the urbanization process used in cuneiform texts (Sumer*, Sume­ in the Middle East, extended from 3 800 to risch § 3), and its history will be considered 3100, when it collapsed (d. Stadt* §§ 3.3, as the result of an evolution which began 3.6). During the Gamdat Na~r period (ca. by the middle of the i h mill. and ended 3100-2900), Uruk (layer III) and other cit­ with the fall of the Third Dynasty of Ur. ies of southern Mesopotamia reorganized and developed a different kind of political § 2. The 'Ubaid period ('Ubaid(-Kul­ equilibrium. The city-state (for a definition turen)"). The earliest known settlement of see Stadt" § 6.5) thus became the basic SUMER, GESCHICHTE political organization in the land of S. feated Iri'inimgina of Lagas, and finally throughout the following Early Dynastic ruled over the whole S. (ED) period (ca. 2900-2300). § 5. The Sargonic period. The pro­ § 4. The Early Dynastic period and cess of political centralization in southern First Dynasty of Lagas". This period Babylonia continued with the rise of Sar­ has been subdivided into ED I (ca. 2900- gon" of Akkad, first king of the Sargonic 2750), ED II (ca. 2750-2600), ED IlIa dynasty, around 2300; this date (given ac­ (ca. 2600-2450), and ED IIIb (ca. 2450- cording to the Middle Chronology) could 2300). ED I and II are still essentially ar­ be moved backward in time depending on chaeological periods, being the archaic tab­ the duration assigned to the Gutian period lets from Ur the most relevant source of (see below). On the other hand, the length written documentation. The quality of the of the reigns of Sargon and his successors information provided by cuneiform texts is still conjectural and is mainly based on significantly changes for ED III: the 'tdmin­ the information provided by the different istrative tablets from Fara (ancient Surup­ versions of the Sumerian King List (SKL; pag") and Tall ~bu-Salabrh for the ED IIIa, Ur III version: USKL). and those from Girsu*, Ur, Nippur\ Adab" From his position as cup-bearer at Kis, or Zabala(m)'· for the ED nIb, allow the Sargon (ruled for 56/55/54 [SKL] or 40 reconstruction of the social and economic [USKL] years) gained control over northern life of S. during this period. It is also pos­ Babylonia, moved to Akkad '., and defeated sible to sketch now the political frame of a Sum. coalition led by Lugalzagesi. Inde­ some of the most important city-states of pendent city-states of the south were thus southern Babylonia (a complete relative integrated in the Akk. state as provinces chronology and synchronisms of Sum. rul­ (Provinz* A), and their rulers became gov­ ers from the Early Dynastic period can be ernors politically subordinated to the Akk. found in Marchesi/Marchetti 2011, 118- king. Apparently, Sargon and his two sons, 128; see also Sallaberger 2004, 17-27). Manist11su* (ruled for 15/7 [SKL] or 15 Thus, administrative tablets and royal inscrip­ [USKL] years) and Rlmus* (ruled for 15/7/ tions documenting the Lagas-Umma border conflict 9 [SKL] or 8 [USKL] years), who succeeded have preserved the history of the First Dynasty of him in a sequence now suggested by USKL, Lagas. It extended for ca. 1.10/120 years, with Ur­ Nanse*, Akurgal", E'annatum*, Enanatum I (Enan­ concentrated their efforts in the territorial nadu* I), Enmetena (Entemena*), Enanatum II (En­ expansion of the empire, reaching western annadu * II), Enentarzi *, Lugalanda *, and Iri'inim­ and southeastern Iran, northern Mesopota­ gina (Uru-inimgina*). Its contemporane~us rulers of mia, northern Syria, and even perhaps Tur­ Umma'} were PA:BIL(GA)-gal-tuku", US*, Enakale (Enakalli*), Ur-Lumma", II*, Gissakidu*, Me'ane­ key and Oman. Naram-Sin * (ruled for 56 dug, U'u, and Lugalzagesi *. On the other hand, the [SKL] or 54 1/2 [USKL] years), the son of rulers from Ur (Ur-Pabilsag*, Meski'ag-Nunna", Manist11su, faced a general rebellion in Akalamdug, Meskalamdug*, Mesannepadda *, A'ane­ which cities from northern and southern pada [Aannipadda"], Lugal-kinis(e)-dudu*, Lugal­ gipare-si*, and Elili*) are mainly known through Babylonia took part. He defeated the coali­ votive inscriptions (some of them from the Royal tion and then devoted his efforts to rein­ Tombs of Ur), like those from Uruk and Adab (rul­ forcing the structure and the organization ers from this city are also attested on recently exca­ of the empire. His deification deeply im­ vated administrative tablets). pacted on the southern population, and his Perhaps under the influence of northern military, administrative and economic re­ Babylonia, and particularly of Kis*, the forms had lasting effects in the life of S. tendency to form broader and stronger po­ During SarkalisarrI*'s reign (ruled for 25/ litical entities in S. began to crystallize with 24 [SKL] or 21+[X] [USKL] years), the em­ Ensakusana * of Uruk, and culminated with pire declined and finally collapsed, pressed Lugalzagesi (ruled for 25 years, according by Elamites, Amorites and Gutians (Gu­ to SKL). This ruler, probably native of tium*). After a short period of anarchy (3 Umma, took control over Uruk and Ur, de- years [SKL]), Sargonic kingship ended with SUMER, GESCHICHTE 299 Dudu" (ruled for 21 [SKL] years) and Su­ Suen* (2°35-2027), the Sum. state enjoyed Turul* (ruled for 18115 [SKL] years). a period of stability, only disturbed by the Amorites' incursions and the Simaskian § 6. The Gutian period. In the span threat (Simaski*). Under the rule of Ibbi­ of time between SarkalisarrI's reign and the Suen* (2026-2003), these problems in­ Third Dynasty of Ur, commonly estimated creased to such an extent that the contribu­ in 40 years (although Steinkeller [in press] tions from the peripheral areas ceased, pro­ assigns 100 years to this period), the politi­ voking the collapse of the system.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Elamite Cylinder Seal Corpus, C.3500 – 1000 BC
    The Elamite Cylinder Seal Corpus, c.3500 – 1000 BC Volume I, Part III K. J. Roach Doctor of Philosophy, (Near Eastern) Archaeology 2008 The University of Sydney Chapter 5 – Summary of Style Distribution across the Elamite Sites The purpose of this chapter is to detail and outline the specific glyptic style distribution at each site included in the Corpus. This survey has two main objectives. The first is the summation and discussion of the Elamite styles from each site, and thereby the revision and reassessment of the ‘glyptic material’ survey presented for each site in the initial site survey section (Chapter 2), by detailing the site glyptic material in the terms of the new Elamite stylistic paradigm here presented. The second intention is to provide some of the background information and data, be it contextual, stylistic and chronological, regarding the function of various glyptic items at each site and across Elam, thereby enabling the following discussion on glyptic function (Chapter 6). The style distribution (how many styles and in what proportions) of each site will be presented, and thereby the basic chronological distribution of the glyptic material, with any necessary discussion where this information strongly contradicts the established chronological periodisation of a site, will be outlined. The glyptic material types (seals/sealings) and the specific materials will be presented, as will any information regarding seal function from provenance (that is, grave or temple context etc.) or type (sealing type especially). For the most part, this information may be presented and detailed in graphs, figures and tables. 5.1 Susa As already mentioned and explained, Susa has contributed by far the most items to the Corpus.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Tombes Royales D'ur
    Les tombes royales d'Ur Lorsque l'archéologue britannique Léonard Woolley découvre, en 1927, ce qu'il appela les « tombes royales d'Ur », en basse Mésopotamie, il est conscient d'avoir mis au jour un ensemble exceptionnel qui reste encore aujourd'hui une source de documentation fondamentale sur la période des dynasties archaïques. Situation de la ville d'Ur Historique des fouilles et de la découverte d'Ur Description et histoire de la cité Le cimetière d'Ur Un mobiliers luxueux et un rite funéraire unique L'architecture des tombes les plus importantes Le poignard d'Akalamdug La perruque d'apparat de Meskalamdug La tombe de la reine Puabi L'étendard d'Ur Conclusion Ur, les tombes royales 1 Situation de la ville d'Ur Ur (ou Our), une des grandes cités-États du pays de Sumer, se trouve dans la plaine alluviale de basse Mésopotamie qui a vu naître il y a plus de 5000 an la première civilisation urbaine et l'écriture. À cette époque, les eaux du Golfe Persique remontaient à plus de 200 km à l'intérieur des terres. Ur en « Chaldée » est également un nom mentionné dans la bible : Terah engendra Abram, Nahor et Aram […] Haran mourut en présence de son père Terah dans son pays natal, Ur des chaldéens […] Terah prit son fils Abram, son petit-fils Lot et sa bru Saraï […] Il les fit sortir d'Ur des chaldéens pour aller au pays de canaan […] Ur, les tombes royales 2 Historique des fouilles et de la découverte d'Ur À partir d'inscriptions que Taylor y avait trouvées, le site a été identifié par Henry Rawlinson comme étant la cité antique d'Ur, rapidement perçue comme étant « Ur de Chaldée », lieu d'origine d'Abraham selon la Bible.
    [Show full text]
  • Purim Part 1: ● the Authorship of This Book Is Unknown
    Purim Part 1: ● The authorship of this book is unknown. It must have been obviously written after the death of Ahasuerus (the Xerxes of the Greeks), which took place B.C. 465. The minute and particular account also given of many historical details makes it probable that the writer was contemporary with Mordecai and Esther. Hence we may conclude that the book was written probably about B.C. 444-434, and that the author was one of the Jews of the dispersion. This book is more purely historical than any other book of Scripture; and it has this remarkable peculiarity that the name of God does not occur in it from first to last in any form. It has, however, been well observed that "though the name of God be not in it, his finger is." The book wonderfully exhibits the providential government of God. By: M.G. Easton M.A., D.D., Illustrated Bible Dictionary, Third Edition ● Since Purim is a national holiday and is not listed as a holy day in Leviticus 23 or elsewhere, it is not a biblically required observation for those in the Church of God. As Esther 9:27-28 points out it was a Jewish invention for Jews. 1. Esther 1 ● Verses 1-2=At this time you have Israelites scattered from India to Sub-Saharan Africa. Ahasuerus--It is now generally agreed among learned men that the Ahasuerus mentioned in this episode is the Xerxes who figures in Grecian history.) ;[Šušān; Greek: Σοῦσα [ˈsuːsa שׁוּ ָשׁן :Susa (/ˈsuːsə/; Persian: Šuš; [ʃuʃ]; Hebrew ● Syriac: ܫܘܫ Šuš; Middle Persian: Sūš, Šūs; Old Persian: ςρ Çūšā) ​ was an ancient city of the Proto-Elamite, Elamite, First Persian Empire, Seleucid, Parthian, and Sasanian empires of Iran, and one of the most important cities of the Ancient Near East.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lagash-Umma Border Conflict 9
    CHAPTER I Introduction: Early Civilization and Political Organization in Babylonia' The earliest large urban agglomoration in Mesopotamia was the city known as Uruk in later texts. There, around 3000 B.C., certain distinctive features of historic Mesopotamian civilization emerged: the cylinder seal, a system of writing that soon became cuneiform, a repertoire of religious symbolism, and various artistic and architectural motifs and conven- tions.' Another feature of Mesopotamian civilization in the early historic periods, the con- stellation of more or less independent city-states resistant to the establishment of a strong central political force, was probably characteristic of this proto-historic period as well. Uruk, by virtue of its size, must have played a dominant role in southern Babylonia, and the city of Kish probably played a similar role in the north. From the period that archaeologists call Early Dynastic I1 (ED 11), beginning about 2700 B.c.,~the appearance of walls around Babylonian cities suggests that inter-city warfare had become institutionalized. The earliest royal inscriptions, which date to this period, belong to kings of Kish, a northern Babylonian city, but were found in the Diyala region, at Nippur, at Adab and at Girsu. Those at Adab and Girsu are from the later part of ED I1 and are in the name of Mesalim, king of Kish, accompanied by the names of the respective local ruler^.^ The king of Kish thus exercised hegemony far beyond the walls of his own city, and the memory of this particular king survived in native historical traditions for centuries: the Lagash-Umma border was represented in the inscriptions from Lagash as having been determined by the god Enlil, but actually drawn by Mesalim, king of Kish (IV.1).
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Morality in Antiquity
    Orientalische Religionen in der Antike Ägypten, Israel, Alter Orient Oriental Religions in Antiquity Egypt, Israel, Ancient Near East (ORA) Herausgegeben von / Edited by Angelika Berlejung (Leipzig) Joachim Friedrich Quack (Heidelberg) Annette Zgoll (Göttingen) 29 Teaching Morality in Antiquity Wisdom Texts, Oral Traditions, and Images Edited by T. M. Oshima with Susanne Kohlhaas Mohr Siebeck T. M. OSHIMA, born 1967; PhD in Assyriology from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel; 2008–10 Alexander-von-Humboldt fellow at the University of Leipzig in Germany; 2010–13 re- search fellow at the Friedrich-Schiller University in Jena (project of the German Research Founda- tion [DFG]); since 2015 DFG project at the University of Leipzig. SUSANNE KOHLHAAS, born 1986; 2016 MA in Assyriology from Leipzig University; 2011–15 research assistant at the Institute for ancient Near Eastern Studies at Leipzig University; 2016–18 research assistant at DFG project “Teaching Morality in Antiquity”. ISBN 978-3-16-156480-2 / eISBN 978-3-16-156481-9 DOI 10.1628/978-3-16-156481-9 ISSN 1869-0513 / eISSN 2568-7492 (Orientalische Religionen in der Antike) The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie; detailed bibliographic data are available at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2018 Mohr Siebeck Tübingen, Germany. www.mohrsiebeck.com This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher’s written permission. This applies particularly to reproductions, translations and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was printed on non-aging paper by Gulde Druck in Tübingen, and bound by Buchbinderei Spinner in Ottersweier.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Sumerian Cities
    Y 28 NEAR EASTERN, EGYPTIAN, AND AEGEAN CITIES enjoyed more starus, privileges, and possesions than orhers. Evenrually hierarchy would prevail- CHAPTER 2 Managemenr of food sources seems ro have been responsible for rhis, with excess production, which en be stored and sold or traded, providing accumulared wealch and power for some. Religion may have offered an ideological justification For such inequaliry. These periods were Early Sumerian cities marked in addi¡ion by innovations in technology (wheelmade pottery, sheer meral), rrans- ponarion (boats wirh sails), and agriculture (tree crops). Trade neworks conrinued, as rhe broad distribution of Hdaf and Ubaid pottery indicates, from Medirerrmean Turkey to Inn. Litrle by linle rhe rechnologiel, commerciel, and social wo¡ld of rhe Ancienr Near Easr wæ preparing irself for rhe rise of full-fledged ciries. The Sumerians (firsr period of dominarion): Ubaid period: a. 5000-3500 Bc Proroliterare (Uruk) period: ca.3500-2900 ¡c Early Dynasric period: ca. 2900-2350r;c The Êrs¡ ciries in the Near Easr-Mediletranean basin appeared in souchern Mesoponmia, or Sumer, rhe crearion of a people we call rhe Sumerians (Figure 2.1). \Ve have seen that environrnental changes in south-west fuia during rhe previous 5,000 years led to human control over food production; with this masrery came major social changes, including Êxed setdemen¡s. The socio-economic developmenr of these towns and villages is marked by the gradual appearance ofthe ten criteria proposed by Childe as a mark of rhe rrue ciry. AII ten factors finally emerge in Sumer during the later fourth millennium Bc. This chapter will explore early Sumerian ciries.
    [Show full text]
  • Urnamma of Ur in Sumerian Literary Tradition
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 1999 Urnamma of Ur in Sumerian Literary Tradition Flückiger-Hawker, Esther Abstract: This book presents new standard editions of all the hitherto known hymns of Urnamma, the founder of the Third Dynasty of Ur (fl. 2100 B.C.), and adds new perspectives to the compositions and development of the genre of Sumerian royal hymns in general. The first chapter (I) is introductory in nature (historical background, the reading of the name Urnamma, Sumerian royal hymns). The second chapter (II) presents a general survey of Urnamma’s hymnic corpus, including arguments for a broader definition of Sumerian royal hymns and an attempt at classifying the non-standard orthography found in Urnamma’s hymns. The third chapter (III) deals with correlations of Urnamma’s hymns with other textual sources pertaining to him. A fourth chapter (IV) is devoted to aspects of continuity and change in royal hymnography by analyzing the Urnamma hymns in relation to other royal hymns and related genres. A discussion of topoi of legitimation and kingship and narrative materials in different text types during different periods of time and other findings concerning statues, stelas and royal hymns addnew perspectives to the ongoing discussion of the original setting of royal hymns. Also, reasons are given why a version of the Sumerian King List may well be dated to Urnamma and the thesis advanced that Išmēdagan of Isin was not only an imitator of Šulgi but also of Urnamma. The final of the chapter IV shows that Urnamma A, also known as Urnamma’s Death, uses the language of lamentation literature and Curse of Agade which describe the destruction of cities, and applies it to the death of a king.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mortal Kings of Ur: a Short Century of Divine
    3 THE MORTAL KINGS OF UR: A SHORT CENTURY OF DIVINE RULE IN ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIA PIOTR MICHALOWSKI, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Assyriologists are at a disadvantage whenever the subject of divine kingship comes up. The issue is not an old one, but it has its lingering ghosts, James Frazer and Edward Evans­ Prichard, and it has its favorite haunting ground, the continent of Africa and the island of Mad­ agascar. Ever since Frazer delineated the problem in 1890, the focus of investigation has been on Africa, and the definition has encompassed three central components: duality, regicide, and the mediating role of the king. Of the three, regicide has been the most contentious issue, but it is one that is hardly important outside of the Africanist debates. Moreover, as Kasja Ekholm Friedman (1985: 250) has written, some have viewed divine kingship as "an autonomous sym­ bolic structure that can only be understood in terms of its own internal symbolic structure." Writing about the Lower Congo (Friedman 1985: 251), she undertook to demonstrate that "it is a historical product which has undergone transformations connected to the general structural change that has turned Africa into an underdeveloped periphery of the West." Here, I follow her example and attempt to locate the eruptions of early Mesopotamian divine kingship as historically defined phenomena, rather than as moments in a developmental trajectory of an autonomous symbolic structure. Most studies of the early history of Mesopotamian kingship concentrate on the develop­ ment of a specific figure in text and art; the underlying notions are social evolutionary, and the methodology is philological, often relying on etymology and the study of the occurrence and history of lexical labels, as summarized well in a recent article by Nicole Brisch (forth­ coming).
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeology of Elam: Formation and Transformation of an Ancient Iranian State D
    Cambridge University Press 0521563585 - The Archaeology of Elam: Formation and Transformation of an Ancient Iranian State D. T. Potts Index More information INDEX A’abba, 179 Aleppo, 169, 170 Apollophanos, 364, 369 Aahitek, 207, 208 Alexander, the Great, 348–50, apples, 137 Abadan, 14 355; I Balas, 373, 383, 387, 388 Arahir, 136 Aba-Enlilgim, 140 al-Hiba, 92, 95 Aramaic, 384, 399, 424 Abalgamash, 105, 106 Ali Kosh, see Tepe Ali Kosh Arashu, 285 Abbashaga, 135, 140 Allabria, 263 Arawa, 89; see also Urua Ab-i-Diz, see Diz Allahad, 168 Arbimazbi, 140 Ab-i-Marik, 22 almond, 155 Archalos, 349 Abiradu, 328 Altyn-depe, 118 archons, at Susa, 363 Abu Fanduweh, 55 Alumiddatum, 136, 138, 141 Ardashir, 410–16, Fig. 11.2 Abu Salabikh, 58, 88, 242 Amar-Sin, 135, 137, Areia, 323 Abulites, 348–50 ambassadors, 138–9 Argishti-henele, 301 Aburanum, 137 amber, 33 Ariaramnes, 287 accountancy, 59–60 Amedirra, 283 Arjan, 124, 303–6, 412 Achaemenes, 287 Amel-Marduk, 293 armour, 203, 277 Açina, 317–18 Ammiditana, 171 aromatics, see incense Acropole, see Susa, Acropole Ammisaduqa, 165, 189 Arrapha/Arraphe, 242 Acts, Book of (2.9), 3 Amorites, 167 arrowheads, copper/bronze, 95 Adab, 121 Ampe, 391 Arsaces, 376–7, 388, 391, 392 Adad, 347 Ampirish, 306 Arsames, 287 Adad-erish, 204 Amurru, 193 arsenic, 218 Adad-nirari III, 263 Amygdalus, 23 Artabanus I, 391; II, 391; III, 369; Adad-rabi, 177 An(?)turza, 347 IV, 401, 412 Adad-sharru-rabu, 191 Anahita, 383 Artaxerxes I, 335, 337, 318; II, 7, Adad-shuma-iddina, 231 Anarak, 33, 34 335, 337, 359; III, 339 Adad-shuma-usur,
    [Show full text]
  • Iran (Persia) and Aryans Part - 6
    INDIA (BHARAT) - IRAN (PERSIA) AND ARYANS PART - 6 Dr. Gaurav A. Vyas This book contains the rich History of India (Bharat) and Iran (Persia) Empire. There was a time when India and Iran was one land. This book is written by collecting information from various sources available on the internet. ROOTSHUNT 15, Mangalyam Society, Near Ocean Park, Nehrunagar, Ahmedabad – 380 015, Gujarat, BHARAT. M : 0091 – 98792 58523 / Web : www.rootshunt.com / E-mail : [email protected] Contents at a glance : PART - 1 1. Who were Aryans ............................................................................................................................ 1 2. Prehistory of Aryans ..................................................................................................................... 2 3. Aryans - 1 ............................................................................................................................................ 10 4. Aryans - 2 …............................………………….......................................................................................... 23 5. History of the Ancient Aryans: Outlined in Zoroastrian scriptures …….............. 28 6. Pre-Zoroastrian Aryan Religions ........................................................................................... 33 7. Evolution of Aryan worship ....................................................................................................... 45 8. Aryan homeland and neighboring lands in Avesta …...................……………........…....... 53 9. Western
    [Show full text]
  • Eski Iran Uygarliklari Ve Yerleşim Yerleri ( M.Ö.6. Bin-M.Ö. 700 )
    T.C. FIRAT ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TARİH ANABİLİM DALI ESKİ İRAN UYGARLIKLARI VE YERLEŞİM YERLERİ ( M.Ö.6. BİN-M.Ö. 700 ) YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ DANIŞMAN HAZIRLAYAN Prof. Dr. Muhammet Beşir AŞAN Filiz TEKER ELAZIĞ -2016 T.C. FIRAT ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TARİH ANA BİLİM DALI ESKİ İRAN UYGARLIKLARI VE YERLEŞİM YERLERİ (M.Ö.6. BİN- M.Ö 700) YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ DANIŞMAN HAZIRLAYAN Prof. Dr. Muhammet Beşir AŞAN Filiz TEKER Jürimiz, ……… tarihinde yapılan tez savunma sınavı sonunda bu yüksek lisans / doktora tezini oy birliği / oy çokluğu ile başarılı saymıştır. Jüri Üyeleri: 1. Prof. Dr. Muhammet Beşir AŞAN 2. 3. 4. F. Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yönetim Kurulunun …... tarih ve ……. sayılı kararıyla bu tezin kabulü onaylanmıştır. Prof. Dr. Zahir KIZMAZ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Müdürü II ÖZET Yüksek Lisans Tezi Eski İran Uygarlıkları ve Yerleşim Yerleri (M.Ö. 6. Bin- M.Ö. 700) Filiz TEKER Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Tarih Anabilim Dalı Genel Türk Tarihi Bilim Dalı ELAZIĞ – 2016, Sayfa: XIV+116 Eski İran tarihi çalışmaları hem İran’ın hem de civar bölgelerin tarihinin aydınlatılması açısından son derece önemlidir. Eski İran adeta dünyanın merkezi konumunda olduğu için İran’da yaşanan bir olayın ya da olgunun başka bölgeleri etkilememesi mümkün değildir. Eski İran tarihine baktığımızda; İran coğrafyasına Hint- Avrupalı toplumlar gelmeden önce bu coğrafyada yaşayan kavim ve uygarlıkların olduğunu görebiliriz. Bu bölgeye yapılan göçler sonucunda ise eski ve yeni uygarlıklar arasında etkileşimin olması
    [Show full text]
  • Povestiri Din Orient (Tâlcuite În Versuri Pentru Cei Mici) Volumul I: Mul-An, Muzica Stelelor Cerului Şi Monologul Scepticului
    DOBRE I. VALENTIN-CLAUDIU – POVESTIRI DIN ORIENT (TÂLCUITE ÎN VERSURI PENTRU CEI MICI) VOLUMUL I: MUL-AN, MUZICA STELELOR CERULUI ŞI MONOLOGUL SCEPTICULUI Valentin-Claudiu I. DOBRE POVESTIRI DIN ORIENT (TÂLCUITE ÎN VERSURI PENTRU CEI MICI) VOLUMUL I: MUL-AN, MUZICA STELELOR CERULUI ŞI MONOLOGUL SCEPTICULUI 0 - 962 1 3 - 0 COLECŢIA ZIDUL DE HÂRTIE - 973 Ediţie electronică pdf CD-ROM 2020 - BUCUREŞTI 2020 ISBN ISBN 978 ISBN 978-973-0-31962-0 1 Page DOBRE I. VALENTIN-CLAUDIU – POVESTIRI DIN ORIENT (TÂLCUITE ÎN VERSURI PENTRU CEI MICI) VOLUMUL I: MUL-AN, MUZICA STELELOR CERULUI ŞI MONOLOGUL SCEPTICULUI Valentin-Claudiu I. DOBRE POVESTIRI DIN ORIENT (TÂLCUITE ÎN VERSURI PENTRU CEI MICI). VOLUMUL I: MUL-AN, MUZICA STELELOR CERULUI ŞI MONOLOGUL SCEPTICULUI Ediţie electronică pdf CD-ROM 2020 0 Dedicată Celor Dragi, Soţiei mele iubite - 962 1 3 - COLECŢIA ZIDUL DE HÂRTIE 0 - 973 - Ediţie electronică pdf CD-ROM 2020 Bucureşti 2020 ISBN 978 ISBN 978-973-0-31962-0 2 Page DOBRE I. VALENTIN-CLAUDIU – POVESTIRI DIN ORIENT (TÂLCUITE ÎN VERSURI PENTRU CEI MICI) VOLUMUL I: MUL-AN, MUZICA STELELOR CERULUI ŞI MONOLOGUL SCEPTICULUI Drepturile asupra acestei ediţii aparţin autorului. Orice reproducere fără indicarea sursei strict prohibită. Lucrările grafice redate nu au restricții de reproducere. SURSELE TEXTELOR ORIGINALE: - ETCSL Project, Faculty of Oriental Studies, University of Oxford; Adresă site: http: //etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/edition2/etcslbynumb.php - Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative (CDLB- Bulletin şi CDLJ- Journal); Adresă site: http: //cdli.ucla.edu - ETCSRI Corpus; Adresă site: http: //oracc.museum.upenn.edu/etcsri/corpus - Colecţia Montserrat Museum, Barcelona, Spain, studii Molina Manuel; Adresă site: http: //bdtns.filol.csic.es - Cuneiform Monographs Vol.
    [Show full text]