DOCSLIB.ORG

The Use of Human Sacrifice in Different Rituals Has Featured Largely in Many Cultures for Thousands of Years

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Use of Human Sacrifice in Different Rituals Has Featured Largely in Many Cultures for Thousands of Years Introduction The use of human sacrifice in different rituals has featured largely in many cultures for thousands of years. To better understand this one must first consider and define what is actually meant by the term ‘ritual’. According to The Oxford English Dictionary, ritual is described as ‘the series of actions used in a religious or other rite’. Renfrew and Bahn (1991, 408-9) indicate that ritual activity can be identified by the observation of four contributing components, such as the focusing of attention on the location, a sacred place; the presence of a possible liminal boundary between ‘this world and the next’; evidence for the worship of a deity and the participation and offerings made by individuals. The term ‘sacrifice’ as defined by The Oxford Concise Dictionary of Archaeology (Darvill, 2003, p371) as the slaughter of an animal or person or the surrendering of possessions to a deity. It goes on to say, Although seen as ceremonial in context, sacrifice may have a functional ends institutionalized in the practice itself, for example the regulation of a population and the creation of an instrument of political terror. Ancient Egypt Kings of the first 2 dynasties (3100-2686BC) were not buried alone. Since death was regarded as a mirror image of life in Ancient Egypt their graves needed to contain all that they had needed when alive. This included members of their household, their servants and their slaves. When the tomb of King Wadji (c. 2980BC) (Wilkinson, 1999) was excavated 455 bodies were discovered. Members of the king’s personal household numbered 338 (Shaw, 2000, p68). Also, the bodies of 77 female and 41 important male employees shared the grave of Wadji’s queen, Mernieth. Many of the servants buried with their employers were deliberately killed for the purpose often by poison. Others, not so lucky, were buried alive as attested to by their contorted bodies when they where excavated (Lewis, 2006, p267). Mesopotamia The Sumerians were one of the first cultures to arise in Mesopotamia, in the area between the Tigris and Euphrates on the Persian Gulf now known as the Middle East. 1 In 1920 Leonard Woolley led an archaeological excavation to dig in the Royal Cemetery at Ur. Woolley (1954) recorded that he found tombs of local kings that were not recorded in the Sumerian king-lists, these King-lists are written lists of kings who reigned for long periods of time (. Woolley discovered nearly 2500 graves in this cemetery along with 16 royal tombs (Van De Mieroop, 2004, p41) that consisted of underground chambers often with vaulted roofs with a ramp or pit for entry. Identified by cuneiform inscriptions, these were the tombs of Meskalamdug, Akalamdug, the queen Pu-abi and others, members of the ruling house of Ur around 2500BC (Bahn, 1996, p144). These tombs contained the skeletons of many attendants and soldiers alongside the remains of Oxen and wooden carts. These royal servants and soldiers numbering in their hundreds were willing victims of a religious rite that would take them into the ‘next’ world where they would be able to serve their chosen king or queen. They had willingly so it appears taken poison and laid down their lives for their rulers. Mesoamerican Aztecs The culture that most people automatically associate with ritual human sacrifice is of course that of the Aztecs of Mesoamerica. These Mesoamerican people believed in a creation story where the gods in order to make humankind used their own blood that in turn created a debt of blood owed by mankind to the gods that had to be repaid. The Aztecs, according to Meyers & Sherman (1995, p65) were constantly at war with their surrounding tribes purely to capture live prisoners so they could then be sacrificed to appease the God Huitzilopochtli and The Flowery Wars began with a mutual agreement between the Aztecs and the Tlaxcalans to capture live men for future sacrifice. The god Huitzilopochtli was believed to take on the likeness of the sun and it was thought that in order to insure the sun's arrival each day, a steady supply of human hearts had to be offered in holy sacrifice (Hogg, 1966, p43). They believed that the sun and earth had already been destroyed four times, and in their time of the 5th sun, final destruction would soon be upon them. In order to delay this happening and appease Huitzilopochtli the practice of human sacrifice became quite a major element in Aztec society (Meyer & Sherman, 1995, p67). The actual ritual 2 would take place outside, on the top of a great pyramid. The victim was spread-eagled on a round stone, with his back arched. His limbs would be held firmly by four priests whilst the officiating priest (known as the Nacom) used an obsidian knife to cut under the rib cage and remove the victims still beating heart. The heart was then dedicated to the sun before being cremated with incense in a brazier and the victim’s body was subsequently thrown down the steps of the pyramid to be beheaded, flayed and then the head defleshed and placed on a specially built rack. The man who captured the victim would then take parts of the body to be eaten during a ceremonial feast (Smith, 1996, p222-5). In the 1487 re-consecration of the Great Pyramid of Tenochtitlan some estimate 80,400 prisoners were sacrificed (Harner, 1977, p46-51), Another rather gruesome but very symbolic sacrificial ritual was performed by the Aztecs to a deity called Xipe Totec (translated, Lord of the flayed skin). According to Moctezuma & Olguín (2002, p54-5) and Fernández (1996, p60-63) Xipe Totec was an important symbol of fertility; war and the coming of age of young warriors a life- death-rebirth deity, god of agriculture, vegetation, the east, disease, spring, goldsmiths, silversmiths and of the seasons. There were two documented types of ritual sacrifice to Xipe Totec, both ending in the same way but the manner of the victims ritual slaying being different. These were the gladiator sacrifice and the arrow sacrifice. The arrow sacrifice consisted of tying a victim to a wooden frame with his arms and legs spread (the frame represented a corn plant) a priest would then fire arrows at the victim to kill them thus making the victims blood then flow onto the ground represented the cool rains of spring (Meyer & Sherman, 1995, p69). In the gladiator ritual, the captive was tied to a large stone, given a sword with a mock blade made of feathers, and forced to fight a fully equipped opponent. After these ceremonies, the victim’s skin was removed so that it could be worn by the Xipe Totec priests (Smith, 1996, p225) who would then wear it for 20 days before removing it to symbolising rebirth and a new season of fertility for the crops and people like a new skin covering the earth. Aztec human sacrifices were performed firstly because the Aztecs felt they owed a debt of blood to the gods. Common Aztec creation myths state that the gods sacrificed themselves to ensure the continuity of the solar cycle, and they had to be repaid with regular offerings of blood. Secondly Sacrifice also carried out a political function. Rulers and priests used sacrificial rituals as a way of publicly demonstrating and strengthening their connection to the gods. Additionally, sacrifice was a form of 3 “propaganda by terror” using conscious displays of intimidation aimed at external rulers and common subjects – discouraging any ideas of violence, resistance, or other non-cooperation (Smith, 1996, p226-7). European examples The various groups of tribes that occupied mainland North-Western and Southern Europe from around 600BC to 1000AD were collectively known as Celts. There is very little documentary evidence to go on. In particular, we have no actual sacred texts of the ancient Celts, as their texts were transmitted orally only to initiates and disappeared forever when the last Druid died (MacCullough, 1911), MacCullough describes Celtic belief in reincarnation and a spectral otherworld, he documents the the large number of now-obscure gods and goddesses, including many local deities, describing totemistic and animistic beliefs. In addition, MacCulloch also describes the darker side of Celtic practices, including the famous 'Burning Man' human sacrifices and cannibalism. Macullough writes about the human sacrifices performed at Lugnasad, Lugnasad was a harvest festival, where the victims were ritually sacrificed to guarantee a fertile crop in the forthcoming season and the festival would also commemorate those who had died for this good cause, while it would also appease their ghosts should they be angry at their violent deaths. ‘Triplism’ is one of the commonest Celtic religious symbols (Magilton, p184-5; Green, 1986) describing the three Celtic gods, Esus, Taranis and Teutates. These three gods relate to the ‘triple death’ usually associated with bog bodies. The triple death consisted of, Esus for hanging, Taranis to burning and Teutates to drowning (Green, 1986, p27). The Tollund man was discovered in Denmark in 1950 (Bahn, 1996, p114). The body of this man was found well preserved having been interred in an acidic peat bog some 2000 years previous to its discovery. The man had been hanged and the hemp cable tow was still in place around his neck. The very fact that he was laid in the foetal position suggests that he was specifically placed this way rather than just cast into a pit alluding to a ritual killing rather than an out and out case of murder or judicial 4 execution. Many similar examples of bog bodies have been found all across Europe including Emmer-Erfscheidenveen Man, a bog body recovered in Drenthe, Netherlands in 1938 (Deem, J,.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Les Tombes Royales D'ur
    Les tombes royales d'Ur Lorsque l'archéologue britannique Léonard Woolley découvre, en 1927, ce qu'il appela les « tombes royales d'Ur », en basse Mésopotamie, il est conscient d'avoir mis au jour un ensemble exceptionnel qui reste encore aujourd'hui une source de documentation fondamentale sur la période des dynasties archaïques. Situation de la ville d'Ur Historique des fouilles et de la découverte d'Ur Description et histoire de la cité Le cimetière d'Ur Un mobiliers luxueux et un rite funéraire unique L'architecture des tombes les plus importantes Le poignard d'Akalamdug La perruque d'apparat de Meskalamdug La tombe de la reine Puabi L'étendard d'Ur Conclusion Ur, les tombes royales 1 Situation de la ville d'Ur Ur (ou Our), une des grandes cités-États du pays de Sumer, se trouve dans la plaine alluviale de basse Mésopotamie qui a vu naître il y a plus de 5000 an la première civilisation urbaine et l'écriture. À cette époque, les eaux du Golfe Persique remontaient à plus de 200 km à l'intérieur des terres. Ur en « Chaldée » est également un nom mentionné dans la bible : Terah engendra Abram, Nahor et Aram […] Haran mourut en présence de son père Terah dans son pays natal, Ur des chaldéens […] Terah prit son fils Abram, son petit-fils Lot et sa bru Saraï […] Il les fit sortir d'Ur des chaldéens pour aller au pays de canaan […] Ur, les tombes royales 2 Historique des fouilles et de la découverte d'Ur À partir d'inscriptions que Taylor y avait trouvées, le site a été identifié par Henry Rawlinson comme étant la cité antique d'Ur, rapidement perçue comme étant « Ur de Chaldée », lieu d'origine d'Abraham selon la Bible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lagash-Umma Border Conflict 9
    CHAPTER I Introduction: Early Civilization and Political Organization in Babylonia' The earliest large urban agglomoration in Mesopotamia was the city known as Uruk in later texts. There, around 3000 B.C., certain distinctive features of historic Mesopotamian civilization emerged: the cylinder seal, a system of writing that soon became cuneiform, a repertoire of religious symbolism, and various artistic and architectural motifs and conven- tions.' Another feature of Mesopotamian civilization in the early historic periods, the con- stellation of more or less independent city-states resistant to the establishment of a strong central political force, was probably characteristic of this proto-historic period as well. Uruk, by virtue of its size, must have played a dominant role in southern Babylonia, and the city of Kish probably played a similar role in the north. From the period that archaeologists call Early Dynastic I1 (ED 11), beginning about 2700 B.c.,~the appearance of walls around Babylonian cities suggests that inter-city warfare had become institutionalized. The earliest royal inscriptions, which date to this period, belong to kings of Kish, a northern Babylonian city, but were found in the Diyala region, at Nippur, at Adab and at Girsu. Those at Adab and Girsu are from the later part of ED I1 and are in the name of Mesalim, king of Kish, accompanied by the names of the respective local ruler^.^ The king of Kish thus exercised hegemony far beyond the walls of his own city, and the memory of this particular king survived in native historical traditions for centuries: the Lagash-Umma border was represented in the inscriptions from Lagash as having been determined by the god Enlil, but actually drawn by Mesalim, king of Kish (IV.1).
    [Show full text]
  • Early Sumerian Cities
    Y 28 NEAR EASTERN, EGYPTIAN, AND AEGEAN CITIES enjoyed more starus, privileges, and possesions than orhers. Evenrually hierarchy would prevail- CHAPTER 2 Managemenr of food sources seems ro have been responsible for rhis, with excess production, which en be stored and sold or traded, providing accumulared wealch and power for some. Religion may have offered an ideological justification For such inequaliry. These periods were Early Sumerian cities marked in addi¡ion by innovations in technology (wheelmade pottery, sheer meral), rrans- ponarion (boats wirh sails), and agriculture (tree crops). Trade neworks conrinued, as rhe broad distribution of Hdaf and Ubaid pottery indicates, from Medirerrmean Turkey to Inn. Litrle by linle rhe rechnologiel, commerciel, and social wo¡ld of rhe Ancienr Near Easr wæ preparing irself for rhe rise of full-fledged ciries. The Sumerians (firsr period of dominarion): Ubaid period: a. 5000-3500 Bc Proroliterare (Uruk) period: ca.3500-2900 ¡c Early Dynasric period: ca. 2900-2350r;c The Êrs¡ ciries in the Near Easr-Mediletranean basin appeared in souchern Mesoponmia, or Sumer, rhe crearion of a people we call rhe Sumerians (Figure 2.1). \Ve have seen that environrnental changes in south-west fuia during rhe previous 5,000 years led to human control over food production; with this masrery came major social changes, including Êxed setdemen¡s. The socio-economic developmenr of these towns and villages is marked by the gradual appearance ofthe ten criteria proposed by Childe as a mark of rhe rrue ciry. AII ten factors finally emerge in Sumer during the later fourth millennium Bc. This chapter will explore early Sumerian ciries.
    [Show full text]
  • Compte Rendu
    PUBLICATIONS DE L’INSTITUT NÉERLANDAIS POUR LE PROCHE-ORIENT À LEIDEN / UITGAVEN VAN HET NEDERLANDS INSTITUUT • 1 VOOR HET NABIJE OOSTEN TE LEIDEN Compte Rendu de la troisième Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale organisée à Leiden du 28 juin au 4 juillet 1952 par le Nederlandsch Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten Leiden 1954 COMPTE RENDU DE LA TROISIÈME RENCONTRE ASSYRIOLOGIQUE INTERNATIONALE Publié avec le concours du Ministère de l'Instruction nationale, des Beaux-Arts et des Sciences .::;? -~ co C'l COMPTE RENDU DE LA TROISIÈME RENCONTRE ASSYRIOLOGIQUE INTERNATIONALE ORGANISÉE À LEIDEN DU 28 JUIN AU 4 JUILLET 1952 PAR LE NEDERLANDSCH INSTITUUT VOOR HET NABI JE OOSTEN LEIDEN NEDERLANDSCH INS'TITUUT VOOR HET NABIJE OOS'TEN 1954 Copyright I954 by Stichting Nederlandsch Archaeologisch-Philologisch Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten, Leiden, Netherlands All rights reserved PRINT:E:D IN THE NETHERLANDS BY E. J. BRILL To the memory of HENRI FRANKFORT the famous Dutch excavator and field-director 1897-1954 Ont pris part à la TROISIÈME RENCONTRE ASSYRIOLOGIQUE INTERNATIONALE: Mmes ou Mlles BARRELET, BATAULT, BOAS, CoQUERILLAT, DAVID, HASPELs, VAN BEEK-VAN BEEK, HERDNER, LAROCHE, MooRTGAT, MoREAU-NERET, RAY, RuTTEN, SPYCKET, ZADOKs-JosEPHus }ITTA, et MM. AMIET, AzouLAY, BAILLET, BARNETT, BEER, BIROT, BLEEKER, DE LIAGRE BêiHL, BoNGAERTs, BoRGER, BoTTÉRo, BRuiNS, BusiNK, CAVAIGNAC, CAZELLES, CROSSLAND, DAVID, I)EROY, DHORME, DoMBROWSKI, DossiN, DRONKERT, DuPONT-SoMMER, DuRAND, EDZARD, FALKENSTEIN, FINET,
    [Show full text]
  • Routledge Worlds : Sumerian World
    THE SUMERIANᇹᇺᇻ WORLD The Sumerian World explores the archaeology, history and art of southern Mesopotamia and its relationships with its neighbours from c.3000 to 2000BC. Including material hitherto unpublished from recent excavations, the articles are organised thematically using evidence from archaeology, texts and the natural sciences. This broad treatment will also make the volume of interest to students looking for comparative data in allied subjects such as ancient literature and early religions. Providing an authoritative, comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the Sumerian period written by some of the best-qualified scholars in the field, The Sumerian World will satisfy students, researchers, academics and the knowledgeable layperson wishing to understand the world of southern Mesopotamia in the third millennium. Harriet Crawford is Reader Emerita at UCL’s Institute of Archaeology and a senior fellow at the McDonald Institute, Cambridge. She is a specialist in the archaeology of the Sumerians and has worked widely in Iraq and the Gulf. She is the author of Sumer and the Sumerians (second edition, 2004). THE ROUTLEDGE WORLDS THE REFORMATION WORLD THE ROMAN WORLD Edited by Andrew Pettegree Edited by John Wacher THE MEDIEVAL WORLD THE HINDU WORLD Edited by Peter Linehan, Janet L. Nelson Edited by Sushil Mittal and Gene Thursby THE BYZANTINE WORLD THE WORLD OF THE Edited by Paul Stephenson AMERICAN WEST Edited by Gordon Morris Bakken THE VIKING WORLD Edited by Stefan Brink in collaboration THE ELIZABETHAN WORLD with Neil Price Edited by Susan Doran and Norman Jones THE BABYLONIAN WORLD THE OTTOMAN WORLD Edited by Gwendolyn Leick Edited by Christine Woodhead THE EGYPTIAN WORLD THE VICTORIAN WORLD Edited by Toby Wilkinson Edited by Marin Hewitt THE ISLAMIC WORLD THE ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN Edited by Andrew Rippin WORLD Edited by Augustine Casiday THE WORLD OF POMPEI Edited by Pedar W.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
    SURESHKUMAR MUTHUKUMARAN AN ECOLOGY OF TRADE: TROPICAL ASIAN CULTIVARS IN THE ANCIENT MIDDLE EAST AND THE EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN SURESHKUMAR MUTHUKUMARAN Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History, University College London 2016 SUPERVISORS: K. RADNER D. FULLER 1 SURESHKUMAR MUTHUKUMARAN DECLARATION I, Sureshkumar Muthukumaran, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. __________________________________________________________ 2 SURESHKUMAR MUTHUKUMARAN ABSTRACT This thesis offers an ecological reading of long distance trade in the ancient world by investigating the anthropogenic movement of tropical Asian crops from South Asia to the Middle East and the Mediterranean. The crops under consideration include rice, cotton, citrus species, cucumbers, luffas, melons, lotus, taro and sissoo. ἦhἷΝ ‘ὈὄὁpiἵaliὅaὈiὁὀ’Ν ὁἸΝ εiἶἶlἷΝ EaὅὈἷὄὀΝ aὀἶΝ εἷἶiὈἷὄὄaὀἷaὀΝ aἹὄiἵὉlὈὉre was a sluggish process but one that had a significant impact on the agricultural landscapes, production patterns, dietary habits and cultural identities of peoples across the Middle East and the Mediterranean by the end of the 1st millennium BCE. This process substantially predates the so-called tropical crop-ἶὄivἷὀΝ ‘χἹὄiἵὉlὈὉὄalΝ ἤἷvὁlὉὈiὁὀ’Ν ὁἸΝ ὈhἷΝ ἷaὄlyΝ ἙὅlamiἵΝ pἷὄiὁἶΝ pὁὅiὈἷἶΝ ἴyΝ ὈhἷΝ hiὅὈὁὄiaὀΝ χὀἶὄἷwΝ WaὈὅὁὀΝ (1974-1983). The existing literature has, in fact, largely failed to appreciate the lengthy time-scale of this phenomenon whose origins lie in the Late Bronze Age. In order to contextualise the spread of tropical Asian crops to the Middle East and beyond, the history of crop movements is prefaced by a survey of long distance connectivity across maritime (Indian Ocean) and overland (Iranian plateau) routes from its prehistoric beginnings to the end of the 1st millennium BCE.
    [Show full text]
  • National Geographic History 1 Executive Editor Amy E
    Needlepoint kit from the Victoria and Albert Museum YUZEN PINES 16.5” x 16.5”. 42cm x 42cm. 12 holes to the inch canvas. The kit uses Ehrman wools. $125.00 This wonderful design is adapted from a pattern found on a 19th century kimono in the Victoria and Albert Museum, London. The V&A is the world’s leading museum of art and design with collections unrivalled in their scope and diversity. Stitching is a great way to relax and the kit comes complete with everything you need: the 100% cotton canvas printed in full color, all the wools required (100% pure new wool), a needle and color chart along with an easy to follow guide to get you underway. hr n Toll Free Order Line: 888 826 8600 www.ehrmantapestry.com FROM THE EDITOR Alexander Hamilton is having a moment. He has taken center stage in the American consciousness, thanks to two men: Ron Chernow, Pulitzer Prize–winning author and historian, and Lin- Manuel Miranda, Tony-winning playwright, composer, and performer. The two came together to create a Broadway musical about the “ten- dollar Founding Father” that brilliantly combines hip-hop with history. At the heart of the show is the question of who tells a person’s story after death. Chernow and Miranda owe a debt of gratitude to both Alexander and Eliza Hamilton for ensuring that Hamilton’s story endures. Alexander’s prolific writings left behind a massive record of his adult life: his thoughts, beliefs, and actions. Eliza curated and preserved this material after his death, a massive undertaking that took decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Vorderasiati E
    Vorderasiati e BegrOndet von E. Ebeling und B. Meissner fortgefOhrt von E. Weidner, W. von Soden und D. O. Edzard herausgegeben von M. P. Streck unter Mitwirkung von G. Frantz-Szab6 . M. Krebernik . D. Morandi Bonacossi J. N. Postgate . U. Seidl· M. Stol . G. Wilhelm Redaktion S. Ecklin . S. Pfaffinger Band 13 . 3./4. Lieferung Steuer. E - Susa. B 2012 Sonderdruck ~ ________________D_e __ G_ru_y_te_r _________________! SUMER, GESCHICHTE 297 Soldt 2005, 316-332. - Sallaberger W. 1997: southern Babylonia was excavated at Tall Nippur als religioses Zentrum Mesopotamiens h im historischen Wandel, in: G. Wilhelm (ed.), Die al-'UwailI" and was dated to the i milL orientalische Stadt: Kontinuitat, Wandel, Bruch in its lowest levels. Older settled life in this (= CDOG 1),147-168. - van Soldt W. H. (ed.) part of Mesopotamia could have been cov­ 20°5: Ethnicity in ancient Mesopotamia (= ered by alluvium, or was perhaps almost CRRAI 48 = PIHANS 102). - Steiner G. 2005: Gibt es ein vor-sumerisches Substrat im sudlichen nonexistent due to difficult environmental Mesopotamien?, in: van Soldt 20°5, 340-355.­ conditions. Tall al-'UwaiII belonged to the Streck M. P. 1998: The tense systems in the so-called 'Ubaid period (ih to 4th mill.), Sumerian-Akkadian linguistic area, AS] 20, 181- also attested, e. g., at Tall al-'Ubaid *, Ur" 199. - Tuna O. N. :1990: Sumer ve Turk dilleri­ nin tarihi ilgisi ile Turk dili'nin ya§l meselesi (= and Eridu". Urbanization and agriculture Turk Dil Kurumu Yaymlan 56:1). - Whittaker significantly developed during its second G. 2005: The Sumerian Question: reviewing the phase, when an expansion - perhaps of issues, in: van Soldt 2005, 409-429.
    [Show full text]
  • Sumer (From Akkadian Šumeru; Sumerian Ki-En-Ĝir15
    Sumer Sumer (from Akkadian Šumeru; Sumerian ��� ki-en-ĝir15, approximately "land of the civilized kings" or "native land"[note 1])[1] was an ancient civilization and historical region in southern Mesopotamia, modern Iraq, during the Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age. Although the earliest historical records in the region do not go back much fur- ther than ca. 2900 BC, modern historians have asserted that Sumer was first settled between ca. 4500 and 4000 BC by a non-Semitic people who may or may not have spoken the Sumerian language (pointing to the names of cities, rivers, basic occupations, etc. as evidence).[2] These conjectured, prehistoric people are now called "proto- Euphrateans" or "Ubaidians",[3] and are theorized to have evolved from the Samarra culture of northern Mesopotamia (Assyria).[4][5][6][7] The Ubaidians were the first civilizing force in Sumer, draining the marshes for agriculture, developing trade, and establishing industries, including weaving, leatherwork, metalwork, masonry, and pottery.[3] However, some scholars such as Piotr Michalowski and Gerd Steiner, contest the idea of a Proto- Euphratean language or one substrate language. Sumerian civilization took form in the Uruk period (4th millennium BC), continuing into the Jemdat Nasr and Early Dy- nastic periods. During the third millennium BC, a close cultural symbiosis developed between the Sumerians (who spoke a Language Isolate) and the Semitic Akkadian speakers, which included widespreadbilingualism.[8] The influ- ence of Sumerian on Akkadian (and vice versa) is evident in all areas, from lexical borrowing on a massive scale, to syntactic, morphological, and phonological convergence.[8] This has prompted scholars to refer to Sumerian and Akkadian in the third millennium as a sprachbund.[8] Sumer was conquered by the Semitic-speaking kings of the Akkadian Empire around 2270 BC (short chronology), but Sumerian continued as a sacred language.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sumerians
    THE SUMERIANS THE SUMERIANS THEIR HISTORY, CULTURE, AND CHARACTER Samuel Noah Kramer THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS Chicago & London THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS, CHICAGO 60637 The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London © 1963 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved Published 1963 Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 0-226-45237-9 (clothbound); 0-226-45238-7 (paperbound) Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 63-11398 89 1011 12 To the UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA and its UNIVERSITY MUSEUM PREFACE The year 1956 saw the publication of my book From the Tablets of Sumer, since revised, reprinted, and translated into numerous languages under the title History Begins at Sumer. It consisted of twenty-odd disparate essays united by a common theme—"firsts" in man s recorded history and culture. The book did not treat the political history of the Sumerian people or the nature of their social and economic institutions, nor did it give the reader any idea of the manner and method by which the Sumerians and their language were discovered and "resurrected/' It is primarily to fill these gaps that the present book was conceived and composed. The first chapter is introductory in character; it sketches briefly the archeological and scholarly efforts which led to the decipher­ ment of the cuneiform script, with special reference to the Sumerians and their language, and does so in a way which, it is hoped, the interested layman can follow with understanding and insight. The second chapter deals with the history of Sumer from the prehistoric days of the fifth millennium to the early second millennium B.C., when the Sumerians ceased to exist as a political entity.
    [Show full text]
  • Download The
    FROM ACCOUNTING TO WRITING The world’s first writing – cuneiform – (fig. 1) traces its beginnings back to an ancient system of accounting. This method of accounting used small geometrically shaped clay tokens to keep track of goods such as livestock and grain produced in the early farming communities of the ancient Near East. Writing, however, did not spring full blown from clay tokens. Surprisingly, it took the Mesopotamian belief in an afterlife to transform a dry and dusty accounting system into what we recognize as writing. Fig. 1. Clay tablet written in the cuneiform Script. Courtesy Denise Schmandt-Besserat. The Mesopotamians believed that to secure eternal life their names had to be kept alive by being spoken after their death. To insure the eternal vitality of their names and their ghosts, the Mesopotamians repurposed the old accounting symbols into phonetic signs “spelling” out a person’s name. Individuals’ names were inscribed on funerary offerings and served, in effect, as perpetual utterances of a name. Over time, the phonetic name inscriptions evolved into phonetic sentences appealing to the gods for eternal life. These impassioned supplications were the final stage of transition from the clay tokens of old into the first writing. BEFORE WRITING: ACCOUNTING WITH TOKENS – CA. 7500-3350 BC Early farmers of the Near East invented a system of small tokens to count and account for the goods they produced. (fig. 2) The token shapes represented various kinds of merchandise prevalent in the farming economy of the time. For example, a cone stood for a small measure of barley, a sphere for a larger measure of barley and a disc for sheep.
    [Show full text]
  • Bee Round 6 Bee Round 6 Regulation Questions
    NHBB Nationals Bee 2018-2019 Bee Round 6 Bee Round 6 Regulation Questions (1) According to folklore, despite achieving success with this system, Zhong Kui banged his head to death on a palace gate after being refused the \zhuang yuan" title because he was too ugly. The title of \jinshi" was granted to the best participants in this system, who were required to write the \eight-legged essay." Participants in this system sometimes snuck undergarments containing notes on the Six Arts and Five Classics with them to cubicle rooms. For the point, name this standardized system used to select bureaucrats in imperial China since the Han Dynasty. ANSWER: Chinese civil service examinations (accept imperial exams or keju) (2) Taormina was the last holdout on this island against the Aghlabid Emirate, which was invited to invade this island after a revolt by a naval commander named Euphemius. George Maniakes was assisted by Harald Hardrada in his incomplete attempt to conquer this island. That attempt would be completed by the Hauteville family, led by Robert Guiscard and Count Roger I of this island. Nearly all Frenchmen on this island were slaughtered in this island's namesake Vespers. For the point, Muslim and Norman rule were centered at Palermo on what island south of mainland Italy? ANSWER: Sicily (3) One of these institutions of \North America" was created by the Congress of Confederation at the urging of Robert Morris. George Washington appointed Samuel Howell, David Rittenhouse, and Thomas Willing to oversee one of these institutions staunchly opposed by Thomas Jefferson. In an attempt to win the Election of 1832, Henry Clay rushed the recharter of one of these institutions leading to it being swiftly vetoed.
    [Show full text]