Early Sumerian Cities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Early Sumerian Cities Y 28 NEAR EASTERN, EGYPTIAN, AND AEGEAN CITIES enjoyed more starus, privileges, and possesions than orhers. Evenrually hierarchy would prevail- CHAPTER 2 Managemenr of food sources seems ro have been responsible for rhis, with excess production, which en be stored and sold or traded, providing accumulared wealch and power for some. Religion may have offered an ideological justification For such inequaliry. These periods were Early Sumerian cities marked in addi¡ion by innovations in technology (wheelmade pottery, sheer meral), rrans- ponarion (boats wirh sails), and agriculture (tree crops). Trade neworks conrinued, as rhe broad distribution of Hdaf and Ubaid pottery indicates, from Medirerrmean Turkey to Inn. Litrle by linle rhe rechnologiel, commerciel, and social wo¡ld of rhe Ancienr Near Easr wæ preparing irself for rhe rise of full-fledged ciries. The Sumerians (firsr period of dominarion): Ubaid period: a. 5000-3500 Bc Proroliterare (Uruk) period: ca.3500-2900 ¡c Early Dynasric period: ca. 2900-2350r;c The Êrs¡ ciries in the Near Easr-Mediletranean basin appeared in souchern Mesoponmia, or Sumer, rhe crearion of a people we call rhe Sumerians (Figure 2.1). \Ve have seen that environrnental changes in south-west fuia during rhe previous 5,000 years led to human control over food production; with this masrery came major social changes, including Êxed setdemen¡s. The socio-economic developmenr of these towns and villages is marked by the gradual appearance ofthe ten criteria proposed by Childe as a mark of rhe rrue ciry. AII ten factors finally emerge in Sumer during the later fourth millennium Bc. This chapter will explore early Sumerian ciries. We will wanr ro ask why true cities originated in southern Mesopotamia, a small region that did not figure in the Fertile Crescent and the Anatolian-Zagros highlands, areas so important for the domes¡ication of planrc and animals. lVhar factors led rhe Sumerians ro develop writing, che rool rhat propelled their settlemenrs inro thc rank of "ciry"? \ühar characrerized the Sumerian ciry, and how did it compare and conrras¡ wirh rhe Neolithic towns presented in Chapter 1? As examples, we shall inspect in parricular che city of IJruk and irs nonhern colony ar Habzba Kabira. Aspeccs of rwo additional cities will also be examined: rhe Temph Oual, an important religious complex ar KhaFajeh; and the Royal Tombs of Ur, a specracular group of burials from the Early Dynasric III period, found in¡act. But Êrsr, before we turn ¡o Uruk, some background information about the Sumerians is needed. THE SUMERIANS AND THEIR ENVIRONMENT The Sumerians, the inhabitants of southern Mesopotamia from rhe founh into the early second *Shumer-" millennium sc, are so called after the ancient Akkadian name for rhis region, Thanks ro their wriring, invented during rhe fourth millennium BC, fa¡ more is known about the Sumerians rhan abour rheir anonymous predecessors of the Neoli¡hic age. The survival oF the clay rablers on which rhey wrote, together with the remains of their cicies, allow us to rrace with grearer conñdence rhe increasing complexiry ofsociery in rhe ancienr Near East. The Sumerians scand alone in human history. Their language has no known relatives, and their architecture and artiFacrs do nor indicare erhnic ties wirh cultures ofother regions. The conrinuiry of rhe material remains at their ciries suggests, however, char rhe Sume¡ians had 30 NEAR EASTERN, EGYPTIAN, AND AEGÊAN CITIES EARLY SUMERIAN CITIES 31 rerritorial disputes Rivalries be¡ween ciria grw inrense in rhe Early Dynastic period, rhanks to IURKEY e from rhe countryside in rhis region where agricul the upper hand' inro ,h..i,io, towwell pro fned cerrain balance P e ciry-state as rhe bæic In.,."d, " SYRIA flourished. \ t\.\-\ resulr thar those people working in one sector would seek exchanges o€products with the ochers. Another lactor in rhe rise ofthe Sumerian ciry-states was the need ro organize an effective JORDAN J wstem of irrigation- Blisteringly hot in the summer, pleasandy cool in the winter, central and .._.' SAUDI ARAB¡A sourhern Mesoporamia has a dry climare. Irrigarion is required for successful agriculture- AJrhough rhe Euphrares and Tigris swell in the lace spring with rhe water meked F¡om the snow- covered mounains oFTurkey and northern lraq, an annual overflow ofrhe silt-bearing rivers olo2& was not critic¿I for farming - in contrast with Egypt. hre spring, the period of flooding, does nor coordinate well wirh the rwo growing seæons of winter and summer crops. Consequenrly, a sophisricaced system ofcenals was developed to bring water to the Êdds ar rhe appropriàre Figure 2 1 Mesopotam¡a: early Sumerian citìes rimes, and ro protect newly sown crops from being washed away. The land drains poorly, however. ti(/hereas the annual flooding ofthe Nile flushed away rhe already serrled in sourhern Iraq in rhe later Neolithic period, at the end ofthe sixth millennium noxious salts in Eryprian Êelds, in Mesopotamia the irrigarion channels brought salts bur did eC, well before rhey developed rhe arr of writing. This era of the srliesr known settlements in nor remove them. Salr-¡ole¡ating barley became the chief grain. But these sala accumulated the region is called the Ubaid period, named a.fter a sire that has felded a good sample of rhese in the Êelds and gradually ruined the greac Fertiliry ofthe land. Even barley couldn't survive- The early remains. Subsequent periods re the Protoliterate or Uruk period (when rhe city of Uruk problem of salinizrion preoccupied rhe mcients, as documenr as far back as the end of the rhird was dominant); rhen rhe Early Dynasdc period, divided inro ¡hree parts (abbreviated as ED I, millennium Bc resriry. They had no remedy For it, and evenrually it defeared them. II, md III), during which the Sumerian city-states became increasingly prosperous. Today this flat, often marshy area is remore, worked only by herders and modesr farmers. Only Cities are a distinctive feature of the Sumerians. Indeed, the independent, self-governing the many tells dotting the landscape remind us rhat rhis region was once home to a flourishing city was their basic political unit. In this respecr Sumer resembles ancient Greece, as we shall urban civilizarion. see. Geography seems not ro be the determining facror in this political development, For the landscape of Sumer is flat, its rerrain marked only by rivers and c¿nals, whereas Greece is divided by mountains and valleys. Instead, religious reasons seem responsible. Each Sumerian ciry- URUK srate nomindly belonged to a god or goddess. The temple wæ thus the focus of both ritual and economic activiry- ft also became the regional adminisrrarive cenrer. Each town rhat grew around l'he dominanr ciry of early Sumer was lJruk (tVarÞa, in Arabic). F¡om its long and often such a temple wæ entrusted, on behalFof rhe presiding deiry, ro rhe ca¡e ofa m ortallctng (lugal, distinguished hisrory, we shall focus here on Uruk in rhe Protoliterare period (kvek IV and III), in Sumerian) or viceroy (mr)- K.ingship firsr began in rhe cicy of Eridu, according to Sumerian rhe importanr formarive era of Sumerian urbanism. m¡h- The institution was later copied and spread ro o¡her towns- The ciry-state, then, originated Archaeologicd suruey conducred norably by Robert Adams and Hans Nissen in rhe 1960s in remoce, heroic times, the work of rhe gods; rhe divinely sanctioned ciry-srare would be for rhe and 1970s has revealed ¡har Uruk was far and away rhe largesr serrlement ofthe region in the Sumerians rhe basic unir of polirical organiztion. Prorolirerate period. The cicy was indeed immense. Although walls of irs earliest ser¡lemenrc L 32 NEAR EASTERN, EGYPTIAN, AND AEGEAN CITIES EARLY SUMERIAN CITIES 33 ofrhe Ubaid and Protoliterare periods have nor been discovered, rhe mud brick forrilìcarion of mighr come as something of a surprise, considering the important role rhe temple played in rhe the ED I period measured nearly I Okm in length and enclosed a vasr area o F 435ha (Figure 2.2). economic liFe of rhe city as rhe central clearing house for agricultural and orher products- A The site oF the ancienr ciry has been jusr \ùØar exrensively explored since before the Firsr V'o¡ld Sumerian ciry would be [urrher divided in¡o differenr neighborhoods, residenrial, adminisrrarive by teams from the German oriental Sociery. Excavations have focused on rhe temples, rhe maror (including palaces, ifpresenr), industrial (including crafr workshops), and a cemetery. Differenr public buildings of rhe ciry. social clâsses mixed rogether; they were nor segregated in rheir separare neighborhoods. Similarly, The prominence of monumenral religious buildings in Sumerian ciries is striking and marks overlapping of tasks occurred. Craft workshops, for example, we¡e scarrered throughour rhe an important difference from earlier Neoli¡hic towns. In larer periods, palaces, rhe dwellings of residenrial disrric¡s, and bu¡ials mighr rake place benearh houses. There was ¡herefore no standard kings, occupl'this cen¡ral position, but in Sumer, from very early rimes, remples dominated. placemenr oFrhese funcrions in rhe overall ciry plan- After all, as noced above, rhe god or goddess worshipped in a ciry's main cemple was considered Neighborhoods were divided by such leatures as srreers, walls, and warer channels- Indeed, the rrue ruler of the ciry, rhe ruler of all. Orher diviniries would be celebrared in smaller temples rhese last gave Sumerian cities a disdncriye characrer. These canals were parr olrhe larger regiona.l scartered throughout the ciry- Not only ar Uruk, bur also at such rowns as Eridu, considered by sysrem of wetercourses. That rhey rourinely flowed rhrough cities as well as alongside rhem the Sumerians as the oldes¡ in ¡he world, and Nippur, rhe preeminenr holy ciry, remples were demonstrares rheir supreme importance in Sumerian geography.
Recommended publications
  • Download PDF Version of Article
    STUDIA ORIENTALIA PUBLISHED BY THE FINNISH ORIENTAL SOCIETY 106 OF GOD(S), TREES, KINGS, AND SCHOLARS Neo-Assyrian and Related Studies in Honour of Simo Parpola Edited by Mikko Luukko, Saana Svärd and Raija Mattila HELSINKI 2009 OF GOD(S), TREES, KINGS AND SCHOLARS clay or on a writing board and the other probably in Aramaic onleather in andtheotherprobably clay oronawritingboard ME FRONTISPIECE 118882. Assyrian officialandtwoscribes;oneiswritingincuneiformo . n COURTESY TRUSTEES OF T H E BRITIS H MUSEUM STUDIA ORIENTALIA PUBLISHED BY THE FINNISH ORIENTAL SOCIETY Vol. 106 OF GOD(S), TREES, KINGS, AND SCHOLARS Neo-Assyrian and Related Studies in Honour of Simo Parpola Edited by Mikko Luukko, Saana Svärd and Raija Mattila Helsinki 2009 Of God(s), Trees, Kings, and Scholars: Neo-Assyrian and Related Studies in Honour of Simo Parpola Studia Orientalia, Vol. 106. 2009. Copyright © 2009 by the Finnish Oriental Society, Societas Orientalis Fennica, c/o Institute for Asian and African Studies P.O.Box 59 (Unioninkatu 38 B) FIN-00014 University of Helsinki F i n l a n d Editorial Board Lotta Aunio (African Studies) Jaakko Hämeen-Anttila (Arabic and Islamic Studies) Tapani Harviainen (Semitic Studies) Arvi Hurskainen (African Studies) Juha Janhunen (Altaic and East Asian Studies) Hannu Juusola (Semitic Studies) Klaus Karttunen (South Asian Studies) Kaj Öhrnberg (Librarian of the Society) Heikki Palva (Arabic Linguistics) Asko Parpola (South Asian Studies) Simo Parpola (Assyriology) Rein Raud (Japanese Studies) Saana Svärd (Secretary of the Society)
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Inanna Research Script
    INANNA RESEARCH SCRIPT (to be cut and shaped for performance) By Peggy Firestone Based on Translations of Clay Tablets from Sumer By Samuel Noah Kramer 1 [email protected] (773) 384-5802 © 2008 CAST OF CHARACTERS In order of appearance Narrators ………………………………… Storytellers & Timekeepers Inanna …………………………………… Queen of Heaven and Earth, Goddess, Immortal Enki ……………………………………… Creator & Organizer of Earth’s Living Things, Manager of the Gods & Goddesses, Trickster God, Inanna’s Grandfather An ………………………………………. The Sky God Ki ………………………………………. The Earth Goddess (also known as Ninhursag) Enlil …………………………………….. The Air God, inventor of all things useful in the Universe Nanna-Sin ………………………………. The Moon God, Immortal, Father of Inanna Ningal …………………………………... The Moon Goddess, Immortal, Mother of Inanna Lilith ……………………………………. Demon of Desolation, Protector of Freedom Anzu Bird ………………………………. An Unholy (Holy) Trinity … Demon bird, Protector of Cattle Snake that has no Grace ………………. Tyrant Protector Snake Gilgamesh ……………………………….. Hero, Mortal, Inanna’s first cousin, Demi-God of Uruk Isimud ………………………………….. Enki’s Janus-faced messenger Ninshubur ……………………………… Inanna’s lieutenant, Goddess of the Rising Sun, Queen of the East Lahamma Enkums ………………………………… Monster Guardians of Enki’s Shrine House Giants of Eridu Utu ……………………………………… Sun God, Inanna’s Brother Dumuzi …………………………………. Shepherd King of Uruk, Inanna’s husband, Enki’s son by Situr, the Sheep Goddess Neti ……………………………………… Gatekeeper to the Nether World Ereshkigal ……………………………. Queen of the
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Iraq
    Republic of Iraq Babylon Nomination Dossier for Inscription of the Property on the World Heritage List January 2018 stnel oC fobalbaT Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 State Party .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Province ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Name of property ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Geographical coordinates to the nearest second ................................................................................................. 1 Center ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 N 32° 32’ 31.09”, E 44° 25’ 15.00” ..................................................................................................................... 1 Textural description of the boundary .................................................................................................................. 1 Criteria under which the property is nominated .................................................................................................. 4 Draft statement
    [Show full text]
  • Gilgamesh Sung in Ancient Sumerian Gilgamesh and the Ancient Near East
    Gilgamesh sung in ancient Sumerian Gilgamesh and the Ancient Near East Dr. Le4cia R. Rodriguez 20.09.2017 ì The Ancient Near East Cuneiform cuneus = wedge Anadolu Medeniyetleri Müzesi, Ankara Babylonian deed of sale. ca. 1750 BCE. Tablet of Sargon of Akkad, Assyrian Tablet with love poem, Sumerian, 2037-2029 BCE 19th-18th centuries BCE *Gilgamesh was an historic figure, King of Uruk, in Sumeria, ca. 2800/2700 BCE (?), and great builder of temples and ci4es. *Stories about Gilgamesh, oral poems, were eventually wriXen down. *The Babylonian epic of Gilgamesh compiled from 73 tablets in various languages. *Tablets discovered in the mid-19th century and con4nue to be translated. Hero overpowering a lion, relief from the citadel of Sargon II, Dur Sharrukin (modern Khorsabad), Iraq, ca. 721–705 BCE The Flood Tablet, 11th tablet of the Epic of Gilgamesh, Library of Ashurbanipal Neo-Assyrian, 7th century BCE, The Bri4sh Museum American Dad Gilgamesh and Enkidu flank the fleeing Humbaba, cylinder seal Neo-Assyrian ca. 8th century BCE, 2.8cm x 1.3cm, The Bri4sh Museum DOUBLING/TWINS BROMANCE *Role of divinity in everyday life. *Relaonship between divine and ruler. *Ruler’s asser4on of dominance and quest for ‘immortality’. StatuePes of two worshipers from Abu Temple at Eshnunna (modern Tell Asmar), Iraq, ca. 2700 BCE. Gypsum inlaid with shell and black limestone, male figure 2’ 6” high. Iraq Museum, Baghdad. URUK (WARKA) Remains of the White Temple on its ziggurat. Uruk (Warka), Iraq, ca. 3500–3000 BCE. Plan and ReconstrucVon drawing of the White Temple and ziggurat, Uruk (Warka), Iraq, ca.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lost Book of Enki.Pdf
    L0ST BOOK °f6NK1 ZECHARIA SITCHIN author of The 12th Planet • . FICTION/MYTHOLOGY $24.00 TH6 LOST BOOK OF 6NK! Will the past become our future? Is humankind destined to repeat the events that occurred on another planet, far away from Earth? Zecharia Sitchin’s bestselling series, The Earth Chronicles, provided humanity’s side of the story—as recorded on ancient clay tablets and other Sumerian artifacts—concerning our origins at the hands of the Anunnaki, “those who from heaven to earth came.” In The Lost Book of Enki, we can view this saga from a dif- ferent perspective through this richly con- ceived autobiographical account of Lord Enki, an Anunnaki god, who tells the story of these extraterrestrials’ arrival on Earth from the 12th planet, Nibiru. The object of their colonization: gold to replenish the dying atmosphere of their home planet. Finding this precious metal results in the Anunnaki creation of homo sapiens—the human race—to mine this important resource. In his previous works, Sitchin com- piled the complete story of the Anunnaki ’s impact on human civilization in peacetime and in war from the frag- ments scattered throughout Sumerian, Akkadian, Babylonian, Assyrian, Hittite, Egyptian, Canaanite, and Hebrew sources- —the “myths” of all ancient peoples in the old world as well as the new. Missing from these accounts, however, was the perspective of the Anunnaki themselves What was life like on their own planet? What motives propelled them to settle on Earth—and what drove them from their new home? Convinced of the existence of a now lost book that formed the basis of THE lost book of ENKI MFMOHCS XND PKjOPHeCieS OF XN eXTfCXUfCWJTWXL COD 2.6CHXPJA SITCHIN Bear & Company Rochester, Vermont — Bear & Company One Park Street Rochester, Vermont 05767 www.InnerTraditions.com Copyright © 2002 by Zecharia Sitchin All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Competing English, Spanish, and French Alabaster Trade in Europe Over Five Centuries As Evidenced by Isotope Fingerprinting
    Competing English, Spanish, and French alabaster trade in Europe over five centuries as evidenced by isotope fingerprinting W. Kloppmanna,1, L. Lerouxb, P. Brombletc, P.-Y. Le Pogamd, A. H. Coopere,2, N. Worleyf,2, C. Guerrota, A. T. Montecha, A. M. Gallasa, and R. Aillaudg aBRGM (Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières, French Geological Survey), 45060 Orléans, France; bCentre de Recherche sur la Conservation- Laboratoire de Recherche des Monuments Historiques (CRC-LRMH) USR3224, 77420 Champs-sur-Marne, France; cCentre Interdisciplinaire de Conservation et Restauration du Patrimoine (CICRP), Belle-de-Mai, 13003 Marseille, France; dDépartement des Sculptures, Musée du Louvre, 75058 Paris, France; eRetired from British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, United Kingdom; fRetired from British Gypsum, Nottingham, NG16 AL, United Kingdom; and gLa Touche, 38220 Notre-Dame-de-Mésage, France Edited by Thure E. Cerling, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, and approved September 20, 2017 (received for review May 5, 2017) A lack of written sources is a serious obstacle in the reconstruction of 1414 (10, 12). After the banning of religious representations, the medieval trade of art and art materials, and in the identification shiploads of alabaster artworks were sent to France (13). In of artists, workshop locations, and trade routes. We use the isotopes England, only a few sculptures escaped the plaster furnaces by of sulfur, oxygen, and strontium (S, O, Sr) present in gypsum being hidden and were retrieved centuries later (14). In contrast, alabaster to unambiguously link ancient European source quarries western and northern France was inundated with outlawed and areas to alabaster artworks produced over five centuries (12th– English artworks.
    [Show full text]
  • Neo-Assyrian Treaties As a Source for the Historian: Bonds of Friendship, the Vigilant Subject and the Vengeful KingS Treaty
    WRITING NEO-ASSYRIAN HISTORY Sources, Problems, and Approaches Proceedings of an International Conference Held at the University of Helsinki on September 22-25, 2014 Edited by G.B. Lanfranchi, R. Mattila and R. Rollinger THE NEO-ASSYRIAN TEXT CORPUS PROJECT 2019 STATE ARCHIVES OF ASSYRIA STUDIES Published by the Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project, Helsinki in association with the Foundation for Finnish Assyriological Research Project Director Simo Parpola VOLUME XXX G.B. Lanfranchi, R. Mattila and R. Rollinger (eds.) WRITING NEO-ASSYRIAN HISTORY SOURCES, PROBLEMS, AND APPROACHES THE NEO- ASSYRIAN TEXT CORPUS PROJECT State Archives of Assyria Studies is a series of monographic studies relating to and supplementing the text editions published in the SAA series. Manuscripts are accepted in English, French and German. The responsibility for the contents of the volumes rests entirely with the authors. © 2019 by the Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project, Helsinki and the Foundation for Finnish Assyriological Research All Rights Reserved Published with the support of the Foundation for Finnish Assyriological Research Set in Times The Assyrian Royal Seal emblem drawn by Dominique Collon from original Seventh Century B.C. impressions (BM 84672 and 84677) in the British Museum Cover: Assyrian scribes recording spoils of war. Wall painting in the palace of Til-Barsip. After A. Parrot, Nineveh and Babylon (Paris, 1961), fig. 348. Typesetting by G.B. Lanfranchi Cover typography by Teemu Lipasti and Mikko Heikkinen Printed in the USA ISBN-13 978-952-10-9503-0 (Volume 30) ISSN 1235-1032 (SAAS) ISSN 1798-7431 (PFFAR) CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................. vii Giovanni Battista Lanfranchi, Raija Mattila, Robert Rollinger, Introduction ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Rings, Kings, Saints and Toads Protective and Healing Functions of Late Medieval Amulet Rings in England
    Rings, Kings, Saints and Toads Protective and Healing Functions of Late Medieval Amulet Rings in England In 1441, Margaret Paston was expecting her first child. Anxiously, she wrote to her husband John in London: ‘I pray that you will wear the ring with the image of Saint Margaret that I sent you for a remembrance until you come home.’1 In asking her husband to wear a ring emblazoned with the patron saint of childbirth to support her in her time of need (e.g. Fig. 1), Margaret Paston was engaging with a culture of healing and devotion in late medieval England that was centred around the amuletic use of rings. (Fig. 1, a St Margaret ring which bears similarities to the Paston Ring, 15thc, British Museum, AF.910) This use of rings was part of a wider practice of employing jewellery as amulets in medicine. Pendants, brooches, bracelets, diadems, belts and hair pins were emblazoned with holy figures, sacred inscriptions and precious stones, all of which conveyed the wearer’s wealth and piety, but also afforded a variety of protective functions through expressing their devotion. Illness or misfortune was often linked to punishment and sin in the middle ages and adorning the body with holy words and images was considered an effective method of devotional healing. These accessories could provide a range of protections, such as shielding against plague, dampening fevers, staunching blood or even protecting from occult practices. However, to consider these amulets as simply products of folk beliefs and superstitions is to underestimate their position in late medieval medicine and devotion.
    [Show full text]
  • Marten Stol WOMEN in the ANCIENT NEAR EAST
    Marten Stol WOMEN IN THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST Marten Stol Women in the Ancient Near East Marten Stol Women in the Ancient Near East Translated by Helen and Mervyn Richardson ISBN 978-1-61451-323-0 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-1-61451-263-9 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-1-5015-0021-3 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/ Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. Original edition: Vrouwen van Babylon. Prinsessen, priesteressen, prostituees in de bakermat van de cultuur. Uitgeverij Kok, Utrecht (2012). Translated by Helen and Mervyn Richardson © 2016 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin Cover Image: Marten Stol Typesetting: Dörlemann Satz GmbH & Co. KG, Lemförde Printing and binding: cpi books GmbH, Leck ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Table of Contents Introduction 1 Map 5 1 Her outward appearance 7 1.1 Phases of life 7 1.2 The girl 10 1.3 The virgin 13 1.4 Women’s clothing 17 1.5 Cosmetics and beauty 47 1.6 The language of women 56 1.7 Women’s names 58 2 Marriage 60 2.1 Preparations 62 2.2 Age for marrying 66 2.3 Regulations 67 2.4 The betrothal 72 2.5 The wedding 93 2.6
    [Show full text]
  • Women in the Ancient Near East: a Sourcebook
    WOMEN IN THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST Women in the Ancient Near East provides a collection of primary sources that further our understanding of women from Mesopotamian and Near Eastern civiliza- tions, from the earliest historical and literary texts in the third millennium BC to the end of Mesopotamian political autonomy in the sixth century BC. This book is a valuable resource for historians of the Near East and for those studying women in the ancient world. It moves beyond simply identifying women in the Near East to attempting to place them in historical and literary context, follow- ing the latest research. A number of literary genres are represented, including myths and epics, proverbs, medical texts, law collections, letters and treaties, as well as building, dedicatory, and funerary inscriptions. Mark W. Chavalas is Professor of History at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, where he has taught since 1989. Among his publications are the edited Emar: The History, Religion, and Culture of a Syrian Town in the Late Bronze Age (1996), Mesopotamia and the Bible (2002), and The Ancient Near East: Historical Sources in Translation (2006), and he has had research fellowships at Yale, Harvard, Cornell, Cal-Berkeley, and a number of other universities. He has nine seasons of exca- vation at various Bronze Age sites in Syria, including Tell Ashara/Terqa and Tell Mozan/Urkesh. ROUTLEDGE SOURCEBOOKS FOR THE ANCIENT WORLD HISTORIANS OF ANCIENT ROME, THIRD EDITION Ronald Mellor TRIALS FROM CLASSICAL ATHENS, SECOND EDITION Christopher Carey ANCIENT GREECE, THIRD EDITION Matthew Dillon and Lynda Garland READINGS IN LATE ANTIQUITY, SECOND EDITION Michael Maas GREEK AND ROMAN EDUCATION Mark Joyal, J.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Tombes Royales D'ur
    Les tombes royales d'Ur Lorsque l'archéologue britannique Léonard Woolley découvre, en 1927, ce qu'il appela les « tombes royales d'Ur », en basse Mésopotamie, il est conscient d'avoir mis au jour un ensemble exceptionnel qui reste encore aujourd'hui une source de documentation fondamentale sur la période des dynasties archaïques. Situation de la ville d'Ur Historique des fouilles et de la découverte d'Ur Description et histoire de la cité Le cimetière d'Ur Un mobiliers luxueux et un rite funéraire unique L'architecture des tombes les plus importantes Le poignard d'Akalamdug La perruque d'apparat de Meskalamdug La tombe de la reine Puabi L'étendard d'Ur Conclusion Ur, les tombes royales 1 Situation de la ville d'Ur Ur (ou Our), une des grandes cités-États du pays de Sumer, se trouve dans la plaine alluviale de basse Mésopotamie qui a vu naître il y a plus de 5000 an la première civilisation urbaine et l'écriture. À cette époque, les eaux du Golfe Persique remontaient à plus de 200 km à l'intérieur des terres. Ur en « Chaldée » est également un nom mentionné dans la bible : Terah engendra Abram, Nahor et Aram […] Haran mourut en présence de son père Terah dans son pays natal, Ur des chaldéens […] Terah prit son fils Abram, son petit-fils Lot et sa bru Saraï […] Il les fit sortir d'Ur des chaldéens pour aller au pays de canaan […] Ur, les tombes royales 2 Historique des fouilles et de la découverte d'Ur À partir d'inscriptions que Taylor y avait trouvées, le site a été identifié par Henry Rawlinson comme étant la cité antique d'Ur, rapidement perçue comme étant « Ur de Chaldée », lieu d'origine d'Abraham selon la Bible.
    [Show full text]
  • A PRELIMINARY STUDY of the SUMERIAN CURRICULAR and LAMENTATIONAL TEXTS from the OLD BABYLONIAN CITY of KISH by Joshua A. Bowen A
    A PRELIMINARY STUDY OF THE SUMERIAN CURRICULAR AND LAMENTATIONAL TEXTS FROM THE OLD BABYLONIAN CITY OF KISH by Joshua A. Bowen A dissertation submitted to the Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland February, 2017 © 2017 Joshua A. Bowen All Rights Reserved Abstract The collections of Sumerian and Akkadian tablets that have been excavated at various Old Babylonian sites have been surveyed and subjected to corpus-based analysis, including the tablets from prominent cities such as Nippur, Ur, Sippar, Isin, and Uruk. However, until very recently, attention has not focused on the important northern city of Kiš. Although many of the literary and liturgical duplicates from Kiš have been translated and discussed, neither the curricular nor the lamentational corpora have been treated as a whole. The goal of my dissertation, therefore, is to survey and analyze the entirety of the Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1600 BCE) curricular and lamentational textual material from Kiš in order to identify local features or traditions that were unique to these genres. The survey of the curricular textual material will seek to accomplish two goals. First, it will identify the curricular compositions that were used in scribal education at Kiš during the OB period. Second, it will determine the ways in which the Kiš scribal curriculum deviated from the curricula that are known from other OB cites, such as Nippur, Ur, and Sippar. The latter investigation will reveal two patterns at Kiš. First, it will demonstrate that, although several curricular duplicates varied from manuscripts found at the major scribal center, Nippur, there is evidence to suggest that there were lines of textual transmission that connected the OB Kiš lexical tradition to those that were found in the MB and the first millennium.
    [Show full text]