MAY 2014 the Turning Point for European Democracy?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MAY 2014 the Turning Point for European Democracy? QueriesSummer 2014 / Issue 4 / €5.90 THE EUROPEAN PROGRESSIVE MAGAZINE COLUMN JOSEPH STIGLITZ MY EUROPE LULA MAY 2014 The turning point for European democracy? 28 analyses from 28 countries About Queries Isaac Newton’s famous book “Opticks” concludes with a set of “Queries.” These “Queries” are not questions in the ordinary sense, but rather rhetorical questions intended to stimulate thinking. This was Newton’s mode of explaining “by query.” Made with the financial support of the European Parliament No 4 / Summer 2014 / CPPAP 0416 U 92285 – ISSN 2032-9113 – Queries is the scientific magazine of the Foundation for European Progressive Studies. The Foundation for European Progressive Studies (FEPS) is the first progressive political foundation established at the European level. Created in 2007 and co-financed by the European Parliament, it aims at establishing an intellectual crossroad between social democracy and the European project Publisher: FEPS – Foundation for European Progressive Studies. First published in Belgium 2012/2013 Magazine Editor of Queries: Dr. Ernst Stetter (Secretary General – FEPS) Editor-in-Chief: Alain Bloëdt Associate Editor-in-Chief: Olivier Breton Editorial Committee: Charlotte Billingham, Giovanni Cozzi, David Kitching, Ania Skrzypek, Judit Tanczos Journalists: Iulia Badea-Guéritée, Cécile Calla, Lorenzo Consoli, Sam Davies, Jacques Docquiert, Trevor Huggins, Moritz Pfeifer, Charlotte Saliou, Eric Sundström, Ian Willoughby Cover Illustration: Antoine Corbineau Design & Production: All Contents, France Translation: Semantis Photo Credits (Pages 6-7): DR, Félix Bernad, IRIS, European Union 2014 - EP, Ricardo Stuckert/Instituto Lula, Cédric Méravilles, Katherine Roberts, Policy Network, SPD/Marco Urban, VoteWatch Europe, Frédéric Latinis, FEPS, Socialdemokraterna, Archive of the Chairman of the Chamber of Deputies, foto-dd.com, Manfred Esser, Katsumi Saiki - Michael Holmes, Committee of the Regions, University of Leicester – Copyright © FEPS – Foundation for European Progressive Studies. 2 QUERIES — Summer 2014 THE TURNING POINT of May 2014 by Massimo D’Alema, FEPS President, former Prime Minister of Italy or the first time since the first European by the EPP and the liberals. The goal shall be drawing the Euro- elections in 1979, the declining trend of pean people closer to the EU, both by increasing the transparen- the turnout has reverted. Yet, 43.09% is cy of the European processes and actively involving the citizens, still a very unsatisfactory result. Moreover, and by changing the EU policies, which shall be much more this slight increase of the turnout level (only by growth-oriented than they have been so far. In other words, Europe F 0.9 percentage points) is to be ascribed to the needs more than discussions about oilcans, cucumber curves and populist and anti-European movements and parties, which have chlorinated chickens! An attractive Union has to concentrate conquered the support of electors that, most probably, would on attractive concepts that convince the citizens and otherwise have swelled the ranks of the abstainers! hence the voters. If we compare the general features of the new assembly with the Against this backdrop, the socialists’ condition is particularly del- one elected in 2009, two main differences stand out. While five icate. Despite the PES initiative of the Top candidate which has years ago the conservative forces clearly outnumbered the pro- been followed by the major parties in the European Parliament, gressive ones, today these two blocs are substantially equivalent. despite the tremendous EU campaign of Martin Schulz who The second element concerns the significant presence of Euro- knocked the doors across Europe with many thousands of PES sceptic parties, which can count on more than 120 MEPs. The activists, despite a major loss of 53 seats, conservatives won. conclusion seems obvious: the European electors have punished From its 2nd position, it was difficult for the PES and Martin Schulz those parties that have been identified with the austerity policies to ask for the leadership of the Commission. Nevertheless, the and with the current management of the European Union. There- social-democrats cannot purely play the role of the op- fore, it has to be said that the Party of European Socialists position within the European Parliament, considering (PES) as a whole has not been perceived as a strong and that now the progressive governments make up a signif- convincing alternative. icant share of the European Council and that in the Eu- ropean Parliament no other majority is possible. This anti-European attitude is not only to be attributed to the social crisis and the rejection of austerity, but also, particularly in Additionally, the progressive movement should further challenge the richest countries, to the nationalist retrenchment, to the hos- the trend and establish European social democracy as the real tility towards immigrants and to the refusal of the principle of driving force for the European Union. The PES initiative of intro- solidarity. Furthermore, taking into consideration the high level of ducing the leading candidates in 2009 – to which FEPS contrib- abstaining, which concerns the largest part of the European elec- uted – was a substantial step forward towards more democracy. torate, it is necessary to acknowledge that in the member states The next step should be to change the current Europarty system there is a deep and widespread lack of confidence towards po- by offering to their national activists the opportunity to join their litical parties and institutions, particularly the European ones. Europarty, i.e. for progressive activists to join the PES directly. A lack of confidence that is now beyond the mere state of alert. With such new initiative, one can expect that national parties will not be only concerned with EU issues just for the few months Having said this, it is clear that last May electoral results before the European elections but that they will enhance the impose a radical turn. This is something that must be under- debate during the entire legislative term. stood by all the pro-European forces in Europe, and in particular QUERIES — Summer 2014 3 #04 May 2014: the turning point Contents for European democracy? Page 34 © Getty/duescreatius1 © European© Union EP - 2014 INPUT FOCUS P. 36 FOREWORD P. 12 MY VIEW Sir Roger Norrington 10 Observations by FEPS P. 42 ANALYSIS P. 14 ONES TO WATCH Yasmin Fahimi Next Left Jan Hamá ek P. 46 IN NUMBERS with VoteWatch Europe P. 22 ANALYSIS Gerhard Stahl on subsidiarity Comments by Yvan Mayeur P. 51 INQUIRY & Juan Alberto Belloch Austria – Georg Hubmann Belgium – Ariane Fontenelle Bulgaria – Mihail Mirchev P. 28 COLUMN Croatia – Tonči Kursar Joseph Stiglitz on the Eurozone Cyprus – Lefki Panteli Czech Republic – Patrick Eichler Denmark – Kristian Weise Estonia – Jörgen Siil Finland – Mikko Majander France – Gilles Finchelstein Germany – Ernst Hillebrand Greece – Yannis Caloghirou © FEPS Hungary – Tamás Boros Ireland – Nat O’Connor Italy – Michele Prospero P. 30 VISION Latvia – Maris Grinvalds Jan Zalasiewicz & Gunter Pauli Lithuania – Andrius Bielskis on the Anthropocene Luxembourg – Tom Krieps Malta - Aaron Farrugia P.34 INSIGHT Netherlands – Jiska Engelbert André Gerrits on Ukraine Poland – Michał Syska Portugal – Gustavo Cardoso 4 QUERIES — Summer 2014 © Cédric Méravilles © INSPIRATION Romania – Victor Negrescu P.106 MY EUROPE Slovakia – Ľuboš Blaha Lula Slovenia – Sonja Lokar Spain – Juan Moscoso del Prado Hernández Sweden – Eric Sundström United Kingdom – Ivana Bartoletti P. 89 INTERVIEWS Corina Creţu Evelyne Gebhardt Alessia Mosca Javi López Stuckert/Instituto Lula Ricardo © Jytte Guteland P. 110 MEET THE PRESS Kati Piri Dispute over the TTIP P. 94 PORTFOLIO The rise of populism in Europe P. 115 DISCOVERY Musée Soulages P. 120 REPORT Renaissance P. 124 PUBLICATIONS P. 127 ZOOM Italianieuropei P. 128 BOOK REVIEWS P. 131 CARTOON © Ed Thompson Ed © Le Chat by Philippe Geluck QUERIES — Summer 2014 5 CONTRIBUTORS QUERIES #4 Contributors They have contributed to the new Queries debates and thinking. Oriol Bartomeus Juan Alberto Jean-Yves Camus Corina Creţu Board Member of the Belloch Research Fellow at Romanian Member of Fundació Rafael Campalans Mayor of Zaragoza Institute for the European International & Parliament Strategica Relations Luiz Inácio "Lula" da Benoît Decron Patrick Diamond Yasmin Fahimi Silva Chief Curator of the Lecturer in Public General Secretary of Former President of Brazil Musée Soulages Policy at the Queen the German SPD Mary University of London Doru Frantescu Evelyne Gebhardt Philippe Geluck André Gerrits Policy Director & Professor of German Member of the Belgian Cartoonist Co-Founder at European Parliament International Studies VoteWatch Europe at Leiden University 6 QUERIES — Summer 2014 CONTRIBUTORS Jytte Guteland Jan Hamáček Sir Richard Jolly Joan Manuel Swedish Member of the Speaker of the Czech Honorary Professor at Lanfranco Pari European Parliament Parliament's Lower the IDS - University of Policy & Communications House Sussex Manager at VoteWatch Europe Javi López Yvan Mayeur Alessia Mosca Matjaž Nahtigal Spanish Member of the Mayor of Brussels Italian Member of the Associate Professor at European Parliament European Parliament the University of Primorska Sir Roger Gunter Pauli Kati Piri Christophe Sente Norrington Belgian Entrepreneur Dutch Member of the Political Scientist at British conductor & Author European Parliament the Université Libre de Bruxelles Discover the
Recommended publications
  • Agenda EN End of the Plenary Session
    The Week Ahead 25 – 31 May 2020 Plenary and committee meetings - Brussels Plenary and committee meetings - Brussels New long-term EU budget. Commission President Ursula von der Leyen will present the Commission’s revised Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and Recovery Plan proposals and debate with Members in an extraordinary plenary session on Wednesday, from 13:30 to 15:00. Committees Conference on the Future of Europe. The Constitutional Affairs Committee will discuss the next steps towards the planned Conference on the Future of Europe and the EP’s role in it. In their 17 April resolution, MEPs called for the Conference to be Agenda convened as soon as possible, stressing that the EU should engage directly with citizens to bring about a profound reform of the Union (Tuesday). COVID-19/Impact on contract and cross-border workers. The Employment and Social Affairs Committee will debate the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on workers’ mobility, particularly for contract workers and cross-border workers, with Croatian Minister of Labour and Pension System Aladrović, Jobs and Social Rights Commissioner Schmit and Interim Executive Director of the European Labour Authority Curell Gotor (Tuesday). Future of EU tourism. The proposed package on tourism and transport, which includes guidelines on how EU countries could gradually lift travel restrictions, allow businesses to reopen and people to enjoy safely their holidays this summer, will be debated in the Transport and Tourism Committee (Thursday). WHO/COVID-19 outbreak in developing countries. The Development Committee will discuss with Dr Michael Ryan, Executive Director, WHO Health Emergencies Programme, on COVID-19 outbreak in developing countries and its impact on the international humanitarian and development response (Friday).
    [Show full text]
  • The EU and the South Caucasus 25 Years Since Independence Nov 25, 2016 by Amanda Paul
    The EU and the South Caucasus 25 Years Since Independence Nov 25, 2016 by Amanda Paul Wedged between regional powers Russia, Iran and Turkey, the South Caucasus is an extraordinarily complex region; one of the most security-challenged and fragmented regions in the world with internal and external security threats working to reinforce each other. The three South Caucasus states – Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan – are complicated even in their internal configuration. Twenty-five years since the collapse of the Soviet Union the region remains plagued by conflict, its people living in insecurity. Moreover, the region has not been politically or economically integrated. Rather Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia have integrated into a wide-range of different, sometimes opposing, organisations and alliances. The EU joined the mix of actors and organisations engaged in the South Caucasus in the early 1990‟s intensifying its engagement over the years with the three states becoming part of the EU‟s European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) and Eastern Partnership (EaP). Despite hopes that the ENP/EaP could act as transformative tool to help strengthen stability, security, democracy and bring about a more cohesive region, the results have been rather patchy. The EU has failed to carve out a clear strategy or policy for the region and with the exception of Georgia there has been little genuine will to implement serious reform. Moreover, Russia‟s annexation of Crimea and war in the Donbas in 2014 and the increasingly polarised standoff between Moscow and the West has further exacerbated the fragile security situation, further exposing the inability of the EU to guarantee or even shore-up a partner‟s security.
    [Show full text]
  • EYE2018 Programme 3 FOREWORDS
    European youthevent Programme 1-2 June 2018 Strasbourg #EYE2018 European youthevent Table of content Forewords .................................................................................................................. p. 5 The EYE follow-up ................................................................................................... p. 8 Programme overview ............................................................................................ p. 9 Activity formats ...................................................................................................... p. 10 Extra activities Collective events ............................................................................................................. p. 15 Activities without booking ............................................................................................... p. 18 Drop-in activities ............................................................................................................. p. 30 Artistic performances ...................................................................................................... p. 42 Bookable activities YOUNG AND OLD: Keeping up with the digital revolution ................................................. p. 50 RICH AND POOR: Calling for a fair share .......................................................................... p. 68 APART AND TOGETHER: Working out for a stronger Europe .............................................. p. 92 SAFE AND DANGEROUS: Staying alive in turbulent times ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Programme of the Youth, Peace and Security Conference
    1 Wednesday, 23 May European Parliament – open to all participants – 12:00 – 13:00 Registration European Parliament Accreditation Centre (right-hand side of the Simone Veil Agora entrance to the Altiero Spinelli building) 13:00 – 14:00 Buffet lunch reception Members’ Restaurant, Altiero Spinelli building 14:00 – 15:00 Opening Session Room 5G-3, Altiero Spinelli building Keynote Address by Mr. Antonio Tajani, President of the European Parliament Chair Ms. Heidi Hautala, Vice-President of the European Parliament Speakers Ms. Mariya Gabriel, EU Commissioner for Digital Economy and Society Mr. Oscar Fernandez-Taranco, UN Assistant Secretary-General for Peacebuilding Support Ms. Ivana Tufegdzic, fYROM, EP Young Political Leaders Mr. Dereje Wordofa, UNFPA Deputy Executive Director Ms. Nour Kaabi, Tunisia, NET-MED Youth – UNESCO Mr. Oyewole Simon Oginni, Nigeria, Former AU-EU Youth Fellow 2 15:00 – 16:30 Parallel Thematic Panel Discussions Panel I Youth inclusion for conflict prevention and sustaining peace Library reading room, Altiero Spinelli building Discussants Ms. Soraya Post, Member of the European Parliament Mr. Oscar Fernandez-Taranco, UN Assistant Secretary-General for Peacebuilding Support Mr. Christian Leffler, Deputy Secretary-General, European External Action Service Mr. Amnon Morag, Israel, EP Young Political Leaders Ms. Hela Slim, France, Former AU-EU Youth Fellow Mr. MacDonald K. Munyoro, Zimbabwe, EP Young Political Leaders Facilitator Ms. Gizem Kilinc, United Network of Young Peacebuilders Panel II Young people innovating for peace Library room 128, Altiero Spinelli building Discussants Ms. Barbara Pesce-Monteiro, Director, UN/UNDP Representation Office in Brussels Ms. Anna-Katharina Deininger, OSCE CiO Special Representative and OSG Focal Point on Youth and Security Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • EU-Parlament: Ausschussvorsitzende Und Deren Stellvertreter*Innen Auf Den Konstituierenden Sitzungen Am Mittwoch, 10
    EU-Parlament: Ausschussvorsitzende und deren Stellvertreter*innen Auf den konstituierenden Sitzungen am Mittwoch, 10. Juli 2019, haben die siebenundzwanzig permanenten Ausschüsse des EU-Parlaments ihre Vorsitzenden und Stellvertreter*innen gewählt. Nachfolgend die Ergebnisse (Reihenfolge analog zur Auflistung auf den Seiten des Europäischen Parlaments): Ausschuss Vorsitzender Stellvertreter Witold Jan WASZCZYKOEDKI (ECR, PL) AFET Urmas PAET (Renew, EE) David McALLISTER (EPP, DE) Auswärtige Angelegenheiten Sergei STANISHEV (S&D, BG) Željana ZOVKO (EPP, HR) Bernard GUETTA (Renew, FR) DROI Hannah NEUMANN (Greens/EFA, DE) Marie ARENA (S&D, BE) Menschenrechte Christian SAGARTZ (EPP, AT) Raphael GLUCKSMANN (S&D, FR) Nikos ANDROULAKIS (S&D, EL) SEDE Kinga GÁL (EPP, HU) Nathalie LOISEAU (RE, FR) Sicherheit und Verteidigung Özlem DEMIREL (GUE/NGL, DE) Lukas MANDL (EPP, AT) Pierrette HERZBERGER-FOFANA (Greens/EFA, DE) DEVE Norbert NEUSER (S&D, DE) Tomas TOBÉ (EPP, SE) Entwicklung Chrysoula ZACHAROPOULOU (RE, FR) Erik MARQUARDT (Greens/EFA, DE) Seite 1 14.01.2021 Jan ZAHRADIL (ECR, CZ) INTA Iuliu WINKLER (EPP, RO) Bernd LANGE (S&D, DE) Internationaler Handel Anna-Michelle ASIMAKOPOULOU (EPP, EL) Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE (RE, FR) Janusz LEWANDOWSKI (EPP, PL) BUDG Oliver CHASTEL (RE, BE) Johan VAN OVERTVELDT (ECR, BE) Haushalt Margarida MARQUES (S&D, PT) Niclas HERBST (EPP, DE) Isabel GARCÍA MUÑOZ (S&D, ES) CONT Caterina CHINNICI (S&D, IT) Monika HOHLMEIER (EPP, DE) Haushaltskontrolle Martina DLABAJOVÁ (RE, CZ) Tamás DEUTSCH (EPP, HU) Luděk NIEDERMAYER
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Overview
    ANNUAL OVERVIEW ANNUAL OVERVIEW 2019 Published by Eurodesk Brussels Link, June 2020 Editor and designer: Zsolt Marton Contributors: Audrey Frith, Grazia Cannarsa, Safi Sabuni, Gheorghe Kraszuk and Eurodesk National Coordinators Proofreading: Denise Tempro This publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriv- atives 4.0 International License. 1 Forewords 6-7 2 About Eurodesk 8 3 Building a strong network 9 4 Working together to improve youth services 10-11 5 Training youth information workers 12-13 6 Awarding outstanding youth work 14-15 7 Building partnerships 16-17 8 Enhancing the European Youth Portal 18 9 Supporting EU youth initiatives 19 10 Contributing to EU youth policies 20-21 11 Reaching out to young people 22-23 12 Eurodesk ecosystem 24-25 13 National level initiatives 26-63 14 Eurodesk 2019 in numbers 64-65 CHAPTER 1 • FOREWORDS MARIYA GABRIEL EUROPEAN COMMISSIONER FOR INNOVATION, RESEARCH, CULTURE, EDUCATION AND YOUTH The new European Commission took up office in December 2019 and got off to a dynamic start in its first 100 days. To prepare Europe for the twin transitions – green and digital – we adopted milestone initiatives, paving the way towards a climate-neutral continent by 2050 and towards Europe’s digital future. By taking a resolutely forward-looking approach, this Commission is working for and with the younger generation, notably through the renewed EU Youth Dialogue. Success in both these important areas depends on the optimal use of our combined brainpower. That, in turn, requires the deepening and extension of the European Education Area and the European Research Area and of the related Erasmus and Horizon Europe programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • Einladung Zur Konferenz „Transatlantischer Freihandel – Chancen Und Risiken“ Willy-Brandt-Haus, Berlin Montag, 23
    Einladung zur Konferenz „Transatlantischer Freihandel – Chancen und Risiken“ Willy-Brandt-Haus, Berlin Montag, 23. Februar 2015, 14.00 - 17.30 Uhr Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, liebe Genossinnen und Genossen, die Freihandelsabkommen der Europäischen Union mit den USA (TTIP) und mit Kanada (CETA) sind für viele Menschen in Deutschland und Europa ein wichtiges Thema, das äußerst kontrovers diskutiert wird. Freihandelsabkommen bieten für ein exportorientiertes Land wie Deutschland grundsätzlich die Chance, durch den Abbau von Handelsbarrieren und den erleichterten Marktzugang für Unternehmen Wachstums- und Beschäftigungsimpulse zu setzen. Zudem könnte gerade ein Abkommen zwischen den zwei größten Handelsräumen Europa und den USA die Möglichkeit eröffnen, globale Standards für nachhaltiges Wirtschaften zu setzen. Allerdings haben viele Bürgerinnen und Bürger, Verbände und Organisationen gegenüber TTIP und CETA erhebliche Vorbehalte. Sie beklagen die mangelnde Transparenz der Verhandlungen. Und sie be- fürchten, dass Arbeitnehmerrechte, Verbraucher- und Umweltschutzstandards sowie Regelungen im Bereich der Kultur und der Daseinsvorsorge aufgeweicht oder rechtstaatliche Verfahren und Prinzipien durch Regelungen zum Investorenschutz eingeschränkt werden könnten. Wir wollen eine offene und sachliche Debatte über die transatlantischen Freihandelsabkommen – innerhalb der SPD, im Deutschen Bundestag und in der Gesellschaft insgesamt. Aus diesem Grund laden die SPD und die SPD-Bundestagsfraktion herzlich ein zur Konferenz: „Transatlantischer Freihandel
    [Show full text]
  • PES Council Resolution Approved by the PES Council in Lisbon on 1 December 2017 PES 2019 Common Candidate Roadmap
    PES Council Resolution Approved by the PES Council in Lisbon on 1 December 2017 PES 2019 Common Candidate roadmap For the first time, on 1 March 2014, a pan-European common candidate was designated by a pan-European party, the Party of European Socialists. This was a revolution in the context of the European election, and an ambitious step for a reinforced European democracy. For the first time in its history, European citizens could vote for a majority in the European Parliament not only through national political parties’ lists, but also with a European common candidate for each family, and its leader would become the president of the European Commission. This new democratic path was initiated by the PES, and we should be proud of having lead the way to other European parties After the European elections to the European Parliament in 2009, and after several discussions among our member parties, the PES decided to include this procedure in the PES Statutes by the 8th PES congress in 2009 in Prague in the following terms: Article 25 of the PES statutes foresee that “The Election Congress shall: - elect the PES common Candidate to the European Commission Presidency, through an open, transparent and democratic competitive process; - adopt the PES Manifesto for the European elections.” Therefore, we agreed to prepare the 2014 European elections by nominating one common candidate on behalf of the PES family for the position of President of the European Commission. Next year, the 2010 PES Council in Warsaw adopted a resolution establishing a Working Group led by PES Treasurer Ruairi Quinn to develop a democratic and transparent nomination procedure for election our common candidate.
    [Show full text]
  • OPENING PANDORA's BOX David Cameron's Referendum Gamble On
    OPENING PANDORA’S BOX David Cameron’s Referendum Gamble on EU Membership Credit: The Economist. By Christina Hull Yale University Department of Political Science Adviser: Jolyon Howorth April 21, 2014 Abstract This essay examines the driving factors behind UK Prime Minister David Cameron’s decision to call a referendum if the Conservative Party is re-elected in 2015. It addresses the persistence of Euroskepticism in the United Kingdom and the tendency of Euroskeptics to generate intra-party conflict that often has dire consequences for Prime Ministers. Through an analysis of the relative impact of political strategy, the power of the media, and British public opinion, the essay argues that addressing party management and electoral concerns has been the primary influence on David Cameron’s decision and contends that Cameron has unwittingly unleashed a Pandora’s box that could pave the way for a British exit from the European Union. Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank the Bates Summer Research Fellowship, without which I would not have had the opportunity to complete my research in London. To Professor Peter Swenson and the members of The Senior Colloquium, Gabe Botelho, Josh Kalla, Gabe Levine, Mary Shi, and Joel Sircus, who provided excellent advice and criticism. To Professor David Cameron, without whom I never would have discovered my interest in European politics. To David Fayngor, who flew halfway across the world to keep me company during my summer research. To my mom for her unwavering support and my dad for his careful proofreading. And finally, to my adviser Professor Jolyon Howorth, who worked with me on this project for over a year and a half.
    [Show full text]
  • European Left Info Flyer
    United for a left alternative in Europe United for a left alternative in Europe ”We refer to the values and traditions of socialism, com- munism and the labor move- ment, of feminism, the fem- inist movement and gender equality, of the environmental movement and sustainable development, of peace and international solidarity, of hu- man rights, humanism and an- tifascism, of progressive and liberal thinking, both national- ly and internationally”. Manifesto of the Party of the European Left, 2004 ABOUT THE PARTY OF THE EUROPEAN LEFT (EL) EXECUTIVE BOARD The Executive Board was elected at the 4th Congress of the Party of the European Left, which took place from 13 to 15 December 2013 in Madrid. The Executive Board consists of the President and the Vice-Presidents, the Treasurer and other Members elected by the Congress, on the basis of two persons of each member party, respecting the principle of gender balance. COUNCIL OF CHAIRPERSONS The Council of Chairpersons meets at least once a year. The members are the Presidents of all the member par- ties, the President of the EL and the Vice-Presidents. The Council of Chairpersons has, with regard to the Execu- tive Board, rights of initiative and objection on important political issues. The Council of Chairpersons adopts res- olutions and recommendations which are transmitted to the Executive Board, and it also decides on applications for EL membership. NETWORKS n Balkan Network n Trade Unionists n Culture Network Network WORKING GROUPS n Central and Eastern Europe n Africa n Youth n Agriculture n Migration n Latin America n Middle East n North America n Peace n Communication n Queer n Education n Public Services n Environment n Women Trafficking Member and Observer Parties The Party of the European Left (EL) is a political party at the Eu- ropean level that was formed in 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Zuschauen Oder Einmischen?
    ZUSCHAUEN ODER DEUTSCHLAND EINMISCHEN? Aus der Krise lernen 4 POTENTIALE DES ALTERS NUTZEN! SCHWERPUNKT Arbeitsbereich der FES zum Einbinden bürgerschaftlichen Engagement statt abschieben 21 älterer Menschen INTERNATIONAL Europa aus dem Gleichgewicht 28 2/2010 TITELTHEMA Eigener Arbeitsbereich der FES Bürgerschaftliches Engagement älterer Menschen stärken BÜRG E R S C haftli C hes E N G A G ement und gesellschaftspolitische Partizipation sind zentrale Themen in der Arbeit der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, die auf ganz unterschied- liche Weise bearbeitet werden. Eine besondere Form der Auseinandersetzung mit diesem Themenkomplex ist der Arbeitsbereich „Bürgerschaftliches Engagement älterer Menschen stärken“. In Deutschland ist der demo- einsamung von älteren Men- rungswissen oft nicht in erfolg- graphische Wandel in vollem schen begegnet werden? Wel- reiche Aktivitäten umgesetzt Gang. Im Jahr 2050 wird jede/r che Rollen können und wollen werden. dritte Deutsche 60 Jahre oder ältere Menschen in einer sich Die Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung älter sein, jede/r neunte sogar ändernden Gesellschaft einneh- möchte diesen Trend unterstüt- 80 Jahre oder älter. men? zen und das bürgerschaftliche Ein posi- Engagement älterer Menschen tiver As- weiter stärken. Ein Projektziel pekt des ist es, die ältere Generation demogra- darin zu unterstützen, ihr Er- phischen fahrungswissen, ihre Potenziale Wandels und Ressourcen noch stärker ist: Ältere für die Gestaltung und für den Menschen Zusammenhalt unserer Gesell- sind heute schaft einzubringen. im Durch- Ein Schwerpunkt des Projektes schnitt ist die politische Mitwirkung gesünder von Senioren und Seniorinnen. und besser Schließlich soll durch bürger- ausgebil- schaftliches Engagement nicht det als in der Sozialstaat ersetzt wer- der Ver- den, sondern die gesellschaft- Im Zuge dieser Veränderungen gangenheit.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]