DOCSLIB.ORG

D2.2 Socio Ethical Analysis and Requirements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
D2.2 Socio Ethical Analysis and Requirements FCT-9-2015: Law Enforcement Capabilities topic 5: Identity Management ARIES "reliAble euRopean Identity EcoSystem" D2.2– Socio ethical analysis and requirements Due date of deliverable: 30-11-2017 Actual submission date: 30-11-2017 Start date of project: 1 September 2016 Duration: 30 months Revision 1.0 Project co-funded by the European Commission within the EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation HORIZON 2020 Dissemination Level PU = Public, fully open, e.g. web CO = Confidential, restricted under conditions set out in Model Grant Agreement CI = Classified, information as referred to in Commission Decision 2001/844/EC. Int = Internal Working Document D2.2 Socio ethical analysis and requirements D2.2 – Socio ethical analysis and requirements Editor Dave Fortune & Juliet Lodge, Saher Ltd Contributors Saher, SONAE , UMU Reviewers Atos, UMU 28-11-2017 Revision 1.0 The work described in this document has been conducted within the project ARIES, started in September 2016. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 700085. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the European Commission. Copyright by the ARIES Consortium. D2.2 Socio ethical analysis and requirements Document History Version Date Author(s) Description/Comments 0.1 21/10/2016 Saher Draft sections 0.2 19/11/2016 Saher Updates to GDPR 0.3 11/12/2016 Saher 0.4 02/01/2017 Saher 0.5 16/01/2017 Saher 0.6 21/01/2017 Saher Ethics Chap 2 updating & flow charts, Glossary, EIA review 0.7 22/01/2017 Saher ePrivacy, Single Digital Market update 0.8 23/01/2017 Sonae Barriers to eCommerce; focus groups 0.9 23/01/2017 Saher Barriers to eCommerce; focus group questions 0.10 24/01/2017 Saher VIS and Umbrella Agreement update 0.11 03/02/2017 Saher Updates and uploaded to repository / ethical advisor DSM 0.12 24/02/2017 Saher Societal acceptance model of IT update Vulnerability updating review, plus bibliog updating, airport 0.13 22/03/2017 Saher updating 0.14 27/03/2017 Saher eCom updating; official doc updating 0.15 10/04/2017 Saher eAirport EES updating 0.16 09/05/2017 Saher Baked in ethics by design update 0.17 29/05/2017 Saher Review post Murcia meeting 0.18 30/05/2017 Saher Revision re ~#4.2ff o.19 01/06/2017 Saher Revision #2.1 0.20 19/06/2017 Saher Revision 2.1 re LIBE on encryption/privacy 0.21 23/06/2017 saher Re biometrics and ethics after Ethical Advisor discussion 0.22 28/06/2017 Saher EDPS update 0.23 30/06/2017 Saher Stakeholder claims 0.24 7/7/2017 Saher update 0.25 9/7/2017 Saher Revision 0.26 17/7/2017 Saher editing 0.27 26/7/17 Saher update 0.28 30/7/17 Saher update 0.29 31/7/17 Saher revision 0.30 10/8/17 Saher update 0.31 26/8/17 Saher editing 0.32 3/9/17 Saher Claims and poll review 0.33 14/9/17 Saher Revision update legislation 0.34 30/9/17 Saher edit 0.35 7/10/2017 Saher Update post annual mtg, ethics advisor review, and pilots 0.36 10/10/2017 Saher editing 0.37 16/10/2017 Saher review 0.38 3/11/2017 Sonae eCommerce findings 0.39 6/11/2017 Sonae & Saher Joint review & update 0.40 6/11/2017 Saher Edit and dissemination Saher, Atos,UMU, 0.41 13/11/2017 Discussion, revision, update & review Sonae 0.42 27/11/2017 Saher & Sonae Final review 1.0 29/11/2017 Atos Format review Page 3 D2.2 Socio ethical analysis and requirements Executive Summary In developing a technically innovative eID, Aries seeks to move beyond the state of the art to incorporate ethical concerns into the development of an eID that citizens can trust, that is informed by adherence to ethical principles, and which is appropriate to meeting the challenges and ambitions of the digital single market. Ethics is a key to gaining public trust in the eID for multi-purpose use. The EU is keen to see the incorporation of ethics as first principle of technical design to ensure trust. Aries seeks to develop an eID that builds in ethical considerations from the start. The Aries eID rests on the premise that ethical concerns are ubiquitous but not uniform, have different roots and connotations in different societies and across time, and are not readily overcome by systems that rely on large data bases to check and manage identity claims. Aries seeks to find a means of allowing a genuine person to use an eID for all manner of transactions in ways that preserve his/her dignity, autonomy, privacy and security. The Aries eID solution is designed to be non- discriminatory and societally as neutral as possible (meaning, for example, that gaining such an eID does not depend on ability to pay for one, thereby meeting criteria on optimising inclusiveness). Aries develops a technical solution in the vID that is as neutral as possible and minimise the myriad discrepancies across states that arise from different societies; traditions and legacy systems and practices. Informed by an appreciation of tensions in society that may have inhibited eID take-up, and may still hinder its acceptance, Aries recognises that the Digital Single Market goal of once-only enrolment for egovernment has advantages and disadvantages. It outlines issues around automated cross-border information exchange and re-use and related questions. It reflects concerns over an enhanced digital divide; and the ethical concerns related to exaggerated claims for biometrics as well as citizen anxiety over biometric enrolment and sustainable biometric eID dependability. The Aries eID is developed in line with respecting fully existing EU law, standards and prospective requirements under the GDPR. Aries goes beyond the SoA technically with a view to showing that privacy and ETHICAL PRINCIPLES Pre-cautionary principle security can be advanced simultaneously rather than as a trade-off in a zero-sum Trust game. By providing a technical means to do this, issues around the acquisition of Dignity informed and explicit consent, compared to implicit consent (and the inferred Autonomy consent deduced from ticking T&Cs) is addressed and overcome. Self-determination Consent Equality As a result, many ethical problems are addressed by the technology. They are Inclusion not therefore dependent on compliance with rafts of national legislation which Non-discrimination may not be consistent, uniform or easily enforceable by the user of an eID. Purpose specification Purpose minimization Accountability Aries technical solutions seek to mitigate barriers to eID adoption which may Transparency have cultural or societal origins, and which are often conflated with enrolment Privacy process concerns (biometric template generation and storage) and privacy Security objections. Challenges arise as to the relative weight to be given to the right to Accessibility Necessity privacy (that some see as non-existent and redundant) and to the principle of autonomy, upon which the right to consent and the ‘right to be forgotten’ rest. Some barriers are generic. Page 4 D2.2 Socio ethical analysis and requirements Perhaps the biggest ethical concerns arise not from the eID itself but from subsequent unknowable re-use of information from which it is derived. Can such information be mined, re-configured in full or part, sold or used to make inferences about behavior and transactions. Can it be re-used and linked without the live and explicit consent of the live person to whom it relates and whom it identifies? Aries is aware that information collected for one purpose may not only be re-purposed but used to re-categorize citizens for all manner of purposes, whether tracking for commerce, surveillance, social trends, behaviour or re-selling partial slabs of information. The Aries eID departs from such categorization to create an eID that is a neutral as possible. Aries eID, in seeking to be as neutral as feasible, seeks to use technology to safeguard individual privacy and security against intrusion using algorithms informed by ethical reflection. The Aries eID is a token of the real human. Part of it may be accessed for limited, specific purposes (e.g. to confirm age without revealing date of birth: this person is over 18). Aries recognises the potential of biometrics to provide additional information about an individual claiming to be the person with whom eID is to be matched. It has taken into account different laws relating to the enrolment and storage and use of different biometrics by different states (eg common biometrics like face, palm, voice, iris, gait and fingerprints). It is aware that the EU’s definition of biometric differs from that of the USA. It is aware that video analytics, making use of biometrics, is growing. It is aware that mutual recognition of roles, entitling specified persons to access specified pieces of information, is a complicated process and is not fool-proof. The continuing growth in the development of technologies to mask aspects of biometric identities, in the name of purpose limitation, data minimization and preventing mission and function creep, poses additional challenges. Society may be inclined to adopt steps that inhibit biometric recognition (such as masks). Aries tackles the problem of generating and maintaining trust in the eID by focusing on purpose limitation and data minimization to generate trust by leaving the disclosure of eID fields in the hands of the individual to whom the eID token relates. It draws on feedback from Aries’ interviews with citizens and focus groups to provide a benchmark for citizen perceptions to inform the development of the eID and recommendations regarding an Ethical Impact Assessment.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Agenda EN End of the Plenary Session
    The Week Ahead 25 – 31 May 2020 Plenary and committee meetings - Brussels Plenary and committee meetings - Brussels New long-term EU budget. Commission President Ursula von der Leyen will present the Commission’s revised Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and Recovery Plan proposals and debate with Members in an extraordinary plenary session on Wednesday, from 13:30 to 15:00. Committees Conference on the Future of Europe. The Constitutional Affairs Committee will discuss the next steps towards the planned Conference on the Future of Europe and the EP’s role in it. In their 17 April resolution, MEPs called for the Conference to be Agenda convened as soon as possible, stressing that the EU should engage directly with citizens to bring about a profound reform of the Union (Tuesday). COVID-19/Impact on contract and cross-border workers. The Employment and Social Affairs Committee will debate the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on workers’ mobility, particularly for contract workers and cross-border workers, with Croatian Minister of Labour and Pension System Aladrović, Jobs and Social Rights Commissioner Schmit and Interim Executive Director of the European Labour Authority Curell Gotor (Tuesday). Future of EU tourism. The proposed package on tourism and transport, which includes guidelines on how EU countries could gradually lift travel restrictions, allow businesses to reopen and people to enjoy safely their holidays this summer, will be debated in the Transport and Tourism Committee (Thursday). WHO/COVID-19 outbreak in developing countries. The Development Committee will discuss with Dr Michael Ryan, Executive Director, WHO Health Emergencies Programme, on COVID-19 outbreak in developing countries and its impact on the international humanitarian and development response (Friday).
    [Show full text]
  • EYE2018 Programme 3 FOREWORDS
    European youthevent Programme 1-2 June 2018 Strasbourg #EYE2018 European youthevent Table of content Forewords .................................................................................................................. p. 5 The EYE follow-up ................................................................................................... p. 8 Programme overview ............................................................................................ p. 9 Activity formats ...................................................................................................... p. 10 Extra activities Collective events ............................................................................................................. p. 15 Activities without booking ............................................................................................... p. 18 Drop-in activities ............................................................................................................. p. 30 Artistic performances ...................................................................................................... p. 42 Bookable activities YOUNG AND OLD: Keeping up with the digital revolution ................................................. p. 50 RICH AND POOR: Calling for a fair share .......................................................................... p. 68 APART AND TOGETHER: Working out for a stronger Europe .............................................. p. 92 SAFE AND DANGEROUS: Staying alive in turbulent times ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Overview
    ANNUAL OVERVIEW ANNUAL OVERVIEW 2019 Published by Eurodesk Brussels Link, June 2020 Editor and designer: Zsolt Marton Contributors: Audrey Frith, Grazia Cannarsa, Safi Sabuni, Gheorghe Kraszuk and Eurodesk National Coordinators Proofreading: Denise Tempro This publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriv- atives 4.0 International License. 1 Forewords 6-7 2 About Eurodesk 8 3 Building a strong network 9 4 Working together to improve youth services 10-11 5 Training youth information workers 12-13 6 Awarding outstanding youth work 14-15 7 Building partnerships 16-17 8 Enhancing the European Youth Portal 18 9 Supporting EU youth initiatives 19 10 Contributing to EU youth policies 20-21 11 Reaching out to young people 22-23 12 Eurodesk ecosystem 24-25 13 National level initiatives 26-63 14 Eurodesk 2019 in numbers 64-65 CHAPTER 1 • FOREWORDS MARIYA GABRIEL EUROPEAN COMMISSIONER FOR INNOVATION, RESEARCH, CULTURE, EDUCATION AND YOUTH The new European Commission took up office in December 2019 and got off to a dynamic start in its first 100 days. To prepare Europe for the twin transitions – green and digital – we adopted milestone initiatives, paving the way towards a climate-neutral continent by 2050 and towards Europe’s digital future. By taking a resolutely forward-looking approach, this Commission is working for and with the younger generation, notably through the renewed EU Youth Dialogue. Success in both these important areas depends on the optimal use of our combined brainpower. That, in turn, requires the deepening and extension of the European Education Area and the European Research Area and of the related Erasmus and Horizon Europe programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • Decrypting and [Re-]Building EU Communication: the Quest for Reliable Key-Players
    #04 2014 Public communication in Europe | Communication publique en Europe Focus on Decrypting and [re-]building EU communication: The quest for reliable key-players • Being relevant: detecting trends for government communication • Analysing audiences and their motivation • Crisis communication • Communication and social integration • Southern-Eastern Europe: genesis of a new communication culture Club of Venice | Club de Venise Summary Introduction – Editorial 03 Informality and Truth 05 Summer school on European public communication 07 Unity is not whatever failed us yet 11 Outcome Venice Plenary 13 What is the state of the play on European public communication strategy ? 19 Being relevant - Trends for government communication 22 On the eve of the European elections : perspectives and uncertainties 26 To succeed in Strategic Communications, Analyze your audiences and their motivations 30 Public sector communication in South-East Europe 32 Government communication and cooperation with NGO’s 34 World Forum for democracy 36 Open Government – Open Data So this was cyberutopia ? 40 Analysis of Facebook trends (political authorities pages) 46 Greece is changing – News conference – Athens seminar 27-28 March 2014 48 « Europa nelle lingue del mondo » 52 EESC civil society media seminar 56 EuroPCom 2013 58 « ce qu’ils sont devenus » 60 Seminar on digital communication trends 61 Steering Group and Advisory Group new composition 63 Plenary meeting in Riga – 5-6 June 2014 64 Les textes n’engagent que la responsabilité de leurs auteurs. Ils peuvent
    [Show full text]
  • Bilan 2017-2018
    BILAN 2017-2018 INTRODUCTION D’ENRICO LETTA INTRODUCTION D’IMOLA STREHO Président de l’Institut Jacques Delors, Fondateur de l’Académie Notre Europe Directrice de l’Académie Notre Europe Nous entrons dans la troisième phase du projet d’intégration européenne, et naviguons, une fois n’est pas coutume, en L’Institut Jacques Delors a initié la création de l’Académie Notre Europe lors de l’été 2017. L’Académie a ouvert ses portes eaux troubles. Durant les deux premières phases – l’après-guerre et l’après-effondrement de l’Union soviétique – le chemin en novembre 2017 et propose depuis un parcours de formation modulable en fonction du public. Le parcours se construit à suivre était clair et le vent favorable aux voiles de ce projet qui se développait dans un monde euro-centré, à la fois sur avec des modules d’études, d’échanges avec des experts, des acteurs et faiseurs d’Europe ainsi que des modules de ré- le plan économique et géopolitique. La crise financière de 2008 a mis fin au mythe d’une croissance économique infinie, flexion et d’action sur le projet européen, sa genèse, son histoire, sa géographie et son actualité mais aussi des focus sur remettant anthropologiquement en question le dogme d’ouverture sur lequel la mondialisation et l’intégration européenne des thématiques plus théoriques et transversales sur la démocratie, la place de la société civile, de l’opinion publique ou avaient prospéré jusqu’alors. Ces épreuves économiques ont mis en lumière d’importantes fractures entre les gagnants les liens entre citoyens et institutions de l’UE.
    [Show full text]
  • European Identity 2.0? an Analysis of the European Parliament’S Communication Strategy Via Social Media in the Context of European Identity Building
    University of Twente, School of Management and Governance Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Institut für Politikwissenschaft European Identity 2.0? An analysis of the European Parliament’s communication strategy via social media in the context of European identity building BACHELOR THESIS by Michelle Magaletta Date: 21.09.2015 Student Number: xxxxxxx / xxxxxx B.Sc. European Public Administration / B.A. Public Administration Email: [email protected] / [email protected] Supervisor UTwente: Dr. Ringo Ossewaarde Supervisor WWU: Dr. Alexia Zurkuhlen Table of Contents List of Tables ......................................................................................................... III List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................ IV 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objective ......................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Approach ........................................................................................................ 3 2 A Framework of European Identity and The Web 2.0 ........................................ 4 2.1. Defining Collective European Identity ............................................................. 4 2.1.1 The Significance of European
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Repor T Youth Repor T
    YOUTH REPORT YOUTH REPORT INDEX Editor’s Acknowledgements 2 Introduction 3 Chapter One – Recent Youth Policy Developments in Europe 4 • The European Commission White Paper A New Impetus for European Youth 4 • Resolution of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of 8 the Member States meeting within the Council regarding the Framework of European Cooperation in the Youth Field • The Paneuropean perspective on youth policy: the Council of Europe 18 • Conclusion 23 Chapter Two – Education 24 • Formal Education in the European Union 24 • The Bologna Process 38 • The Value and Contribution of Non-formal Education 41 • How youth organisations can recognise the non-formal learning that takes 43 place in youth organisations • Conclusion 44 Chapter Three – Employment 45 • Conclusion 75 Chapter Four – Social Inclusion 76 • The European Union Social Inclusion Process 84 • Youth Organisations and Social Inclusion 91 • Conclusion 93 Conclusion 94 Bibliography 95 Credits 100 1 EDITOR’S ADCKNOLEDGEMENTS YOUTH REPORT EDITOR’S ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The first acknowledgement that has to be made in this report is to the European Economic and Social Committee who awarded me the François Staedelin scholarship in 2003 to write a report on ‘Youth and European Policies at the Beginning of the 21st Century’. I would like to thank them for their support and interest in youth policy. That report for the EESC has formed the basis for this one. I would also like to thank my colleagues: Anna Sellberg, Roisin Mc Cabe, Emmanuil Vergis and Charlie Faid whose knowledge, skills and expertise have all contributed greatly to the production of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Event European
    European youthevent Programme 1-2 June 2018 Strasbourg #EYE2018 European youthevent Table of content Forewords .................................................................................................................. p. 5 The EYE follow-up ................................................................................................... p. 8 Programme overview ............................................................................................ p. 9 Activity formats ...................................................................................................... p. 10 Extra activities Collective events ............................................................................................................. p. 15 Activities without booking ............................................................................................... p. 18 Drop-in activities ............................................................................................................. p. 30 Artistic performances ...................................................................................................... p. 42 Bookable activities YOUNG AND OLD: Keeping up with the digital revolution ................................................. p. 50 RICH AND POOR: Calling for a fair share .......................................................................... p. 68 APART AND TOGETHER: Working out for a stronger Europe .............................................. p. 92 SAFE AND DANGEROUS: Staying alive in turbulent times ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Model for Open Government in the Eu Acknowledgements
    DEVELOPING A MODEL FOR OPEN GOVERNMENT IN THE EU ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors and the Democratic Society would like to thank all those who willingly gave up their time and energy to be interviewed as part of this project, as well as Andrei Liimets of Open Estonia Foundation and Ovidiu Voicu of the Center for Public Innovation who were our partners and carried out national case studies in Estonia and Romania respectively. REPORT AUTHORS: Michelle Brook, Mat Basford, Niamh Webster, Andy Williamson, and Anthony Zacharzewski, The Democratic Society. Additional input and country research provided by Andrei Liimets (Open Estonia Foundation), and Ovidiu Voicu (Center for Public Innovation, Romania). This report was commissioned by the Open Society European Policy Institute (OSEPI). Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons CC BY license. For more information see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ DEVELOPING A MODEL FOR OPEN GOVERNMENT IN THE EU 1 CONTENTS 1 SUMMARY 2 2 INTRODUCTION 6 3 DEFINING OPEN GOVERNMENT 8 4 OPEN GOVERNMENT AND THE EU INSTITUTIONS 10 5 TRANSPARENCY 14 6 INTEGRITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY 30 7 PARTICIPATION AND CIVIL SOCIETY 40 8 EXPERIENCES OF THE OPEN GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP 56 9 OPTIONS FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE OPEN GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP 68 10 RECOMMENDATIONS 76 ANNEX A – METHOD AND LIMITATIONS 81 2 DEVELOPING A MODEL FOR OPEN GOVERNMENT IN THE EU SUMMARY “Open minds, open societies, and increasingly open systems of government and governance. On the latter, the European Commission aims to lead the way”1 – First Vice-President Timmermans overnments cannot rely on public support – they must earn it.
    [Show full text]
  • EDF Annual Report 2020
    Annual Report 2020 Nothing about us without us Author: Natalia Suárez Editors: Catherine Naughton Contributors: Alejandro Moledo, An Sofie Leenknecht, Gordon Rattray, Haydn Hammersley, Loredana Dicsi, Marie Denninghaus, Marion Steff, Marine Uldry, Mher Hakobyan, Muriel Davia, Raquel Riaza Graphic Design by: Visually Thinking Avenue des Arts 7-8, 1210 Brussels Belgium [email protected] www.edf-feph.org Twitter: @MyEDF This report was co-funded by the European Union’s Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme. The European Union was not involved in the preparation and publication of this report. The European Disability Forum recognises that the opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the position of the European Union. Table of Contents Highlights of our year 5 Who we are 7 Mission and Values 8 Executive Committee Members 10 Board Members 12 Committees and Expert Groups 14 Meet the Team 16 Our members 19 2020 achievements by areas of work 27 Accessibility 28 European Accessibility Act 28 Digital development 28 Transport and the Built environment 29 Children and Youth with disabilities 30 COVID-19 32 Human Rights and non-discrimination 33 International Cooperation and Humanitarian Action 34 Social Policy 36 Women with disabilities 37 Making our voice heard 39 Impact of communication 39 Events 41 Transparency 43 Our partners & close collaborators 43 Financial report 45 4 Annual Report 2020 5 CHAPTER 1 Highlights of our year I am proud to present EDF’s 2020 Annual Report. I would like to dedicate it to all the persons with disabilities who lost their lives, who became ill, or who spent long weeks and months isolated due to COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • YES Forum 2017 Policy Event Brussels, 23-24 November “Reconciling the European Project with Youth – an Open Dialogue”
    Youth and European Social Work Forum - Encouraging young people YES Forum 2017 Policy Event Brussels, 23-24 November “Reconciling the European project with youth – An open dialogue” REPORT Even though the socio-economic situation in the European Union has been improving, a crucial issue remains to be solved in order to secure the long term prospects of the EU: the “widened gap among youth” which has not left the European public scene for a decade. Despite new European Union initiatives for youth, 57% of young Europeans still report feeling excluded from economic and social life1. This widening gap among youth represents a major blunt for the EU itself: an increasing proportion of youth, which the EU still fails to reach, is losing interest in, or turning its back to the European project and its values. This trend, if left unsolved, may very well prove fatal to the European Union in the long-term. That is why the YES Forum organised its 2017 Policy Event in Brussels on 23rd November under the theme “Reconciling the European project with youth – An open dialogue”. Through this event, practitioners from the youth field, young people themselves and EU policy and decision-makers could share their respective views on the best way forward in the promotion of a more inclusive European Union for youth. On 24th November, these discussions were followed by reflexions by YES Forum member and partner organisations focused on the future of the YES Forum, and its roles in overcoming the current challenges in the field of youth. On the following pages, you can find a brief summary of the discussions that were held during these two days.
    [Show full text]
  • Volunteering at Ifoam Organics Europe
    European Solidarity Corps VOLUNTEERING AT IFOAM ORGANICS EUROPE A GUIDE FOR CANDIDATES 2021 – 2022 - September 2020 – July 2021 Credits: Carolina Ferreira As an IFOAM Organics Europe volunteer you have an opportunity to experience a two-week stay at an organic farm. Table of Content 1 Project description ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 What is ESC?............................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 About IFOAM Organics Europe ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Who can join the ESC project at IFOAM Organics Europe? .................................................................................... 3 1.4 What to expect from volunteering at IFOAM Organics Europe ............................................................................. 4 1.5 Financial and linguistic support .............................................................................................................................. 4 1.6 Travel and accommodation .................................................................................................................................... 4 1.7 Insurance ................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]