DOCSLIB.ORG

YES Forum 2017 Policy Event Brussels, 23-24 November “Reconciling the European Project with Youth – an Open Dialogue”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
YES Forum 2017 Policy Event Brussels, 23-24 November “Reconciling the European Project with Youth – an Open Dialogue” Youth and European Social Work Forum - Encouraging young people YES Forum 2017 Policy Event Brussels, 23-24 November “Reconciling the European project with youth – An open dialogue” REPORT Even though the socio-economic situation in the European Union has been improving, a crucial issue remains to be solved in order to secure the long term prospects of the EU: the “widened gap among youth” which has not left the European public scene for a decade. Despite new European Union initiatives for youth, 57% of young Europeans still report feeling excluded from economic and social life1. This widening gap among youth represents a major blunt for the EU itself: an increasing proportion of youth, which the EU still fails to reach, is losing interest in, or turning its back to the European project and its values. This trend, if left unsolved, may very well prove fatal to the European Union in the long-term. That is why the YES Forum organised its 2017 Policy Event in Brussels on 23rd November under the theme “Reconciling the European project with youth – An open dialogue”. Through this event, practitioners from the youth field, young people themselves and EU policy and decision-makers could share their respective views on the best way forward in the promotion of a more inclusive European Union for youth. On 24th November, these discussions were followed by reflexions by YES Forum member and partner organisations focused on the future of the YES Forum, and its roles in overcoming the current challenges in the field of youth. On the following pages, you can find a brief summary of the discussions that were held during these two days. 1 European Youth in 2016, European Parliamentary Research Service [Online]. Youth and European Social Work Forum - Encouraging young people Panel Session 1 | Reaching youth in all its diversity How to reconcile the European project with all youth before it is too late? During the first session, participants discussed the remaining gap between the European Union and a large proportion of youth, and the current and future solutions which could, by bringing European youth, the youth field, and the European Union institutions closer, improve this situation. Guest speakers: Adrian, young participant from YES Forum’s member organisation Nevo Parudimos (Romania) MEP Rainer Wieland, Vice-President of the European Parliament (EPP, DE) Christina Altides, Acting Head of of the European Youth Event Unit, European Parliament Christopher Glück, President of the Young European Federalists – JEF Europe Annica Ryngbeck, Policy and Advocacy Adviser at Social Platform Ronald de Haan, Board Member of the YES Forum and Director of Jongerenwerk Barkema en De Haan The panel session began by involving the audience, composed by a large share of young Europeans. Introductory “Live Polls” revealed that even though most of the participants, young or “not-so-young”, feel they are European citizens and share a common destiny, an important generational gap remains: a large majority of “older” participants declared that they feel involved in EU politics, while the younger part of the audience disagreed. Tom, a young British participant under 18, explained that in his particular case, he was not able to vote for a crucial EU issue: the referendum on Brexit. Afterward, the panellists were invited to express their opinion on this issue. MEP Rainer Wieland, Vice-President of the European Union (EPP, DE), explained that according to him, the responsibility for this gap between youth and the EU is shared: on the one hand, politics needs to go to EU citizens, but on the other hand, EU citizens have to go to politics too. Different recent developements on the EU stage were then discussed. Annica Ryngbeck from the civil society organisation Social Platform, perceives a positive trend in that field: the European Union, together with the European civil society, has developped new methodologies to better involve youth and listen to young Europeans. Among these, Christopher Glück, President of the Young European Federalists (JEF Europe), talked in particular about the Structured Dialogue, a formal consultative process allowing EU decision-makers to listen to youth through conferences, meetings, debates involving civil society organisations. He added, however, that the process suffers an important deficit: it is not binding for the Commission, as it can also disregard these consultations’ results. The discussions then shifted to another positive example of how the European Union can better reach youth: the European Youth Event. Christina Altides from the European Youth Event Unit of the European Parliament presented this still recent intitiative: every two years since 2014, the European Parliament invites thousands of young Europeans – with no need to be formally involved in a civil society organisation for instance – to discuss issues of common interest in Strasbourg, and suggest their own proposals on Youth and European Social Work Forum - Encouraging young people how to tackle these. She observes a growing interest since the first edition of the EYE, and explained that the European Parliament is willing to improve the EYE so that it can involve more young people. For instance, a new “Youth Outreach” Unit was created at the European Parliament, and a specific new idea emerged to help grassroot youth organisations promoting EU awareness: the European Parliament is now providing support to youth organisations across Europe to help them organising “Mini-EYEs” at the local level. Ronald de Haan, Board Member of the YES Forum and director of a Dutch youth organisation, shared his enthusiasm in regard to the EYE, following his participation with a group of young people in 2016, and in reaction to the new “Mini-EYEs” possibility. To improve the inclusiveness of the EYE, and promote diversity among its audience, Ronald also suggested one specific solution: that the European Parliament could invite targetted youth organisations, especially those working with youngsters suffering of or at risk of exclusion, to ensure a better representation of youth in the EYE. Finally, Ronald stressed on another aspect of the issue, following a reaction of the audience. Even though, as MEP Rainer Wieland explained, youth lacks interest in the EU, the status quo can be avoided: youth work can indeed play a crucial in arousing the interest in the EU of young Europeans thanks to its expertise in promoting EU and political awareness, but also needs the support of the EU institutions to be able to carry out this most needed mission. The lack of funding in the youth field, examplified by a large majority of non-approved quality Erasmus+ project applications but also observable at the national level, was raised as a clear obstacle to that mission. Panel Session 2 | The European Solidarity Corps Part of the solution, future of the EU support to youth, or old wine in a new bottle? The second panel session focused on the most recent initiative of the European Commission in the field of youth, the European Solidarity Corps (ESC), and its potential contribution to tackling the issues addressed during the first panel session by reaching more young people. Guest speakers: Pleun, young participant from YES Forum’s member organisation Stichting Go (Netherlands) Robert France, European Commission, DG Education and Culture, Head of sector “Erasmus+: Youth” Frédérique Chabaud, European Parliament, Political Adviser, Greens/EFA Matteo Adduci, European Parliament, Assistant to MEP Brando Benifei (S&D, IT) Pavel Trantina, EESC, President of the Section for Employment, Social Affairs and Citizenship The session was introduced by Robert France, Head of the sector “Erasmus+: Youth” in the Directorate-General “Education and Culture” of the European Commission. He started by presenting the state of the art: the ESC started through a single online platform matching young interested Europeans with already existing mobility opportunities (EVS and internships through Erasmus+ for instance), and a legislative proposal is now being negotiated by the European Parliament and Council of the EU in order to provide a legal basis and own funds to the ESC. More details on the framework proposed by the European Commission can be found here. Youth and European Social Work Forum - Encouraging young people Robert France then presented additional details of this initiative through which the EC aims at reaching 100 000 placements by 2020. He explained that, following a public consultation, two main concerns were included by the Commission: Quality placements and Inclusion. To make the ESC inclusive, and build upon the European Voluntary Service implemented through Erasmus+ so far, several innovations were included: the ESC will for instance fund volunteering teams, and not only individual mobilities, and will also dedicate a budget to fund initiatives of young Europeans at the local level, without necessarily a transnational aspect. Moreover, he stressed on one key ambition of the Commission: bringing “fresh money” to reach a budget of EUR 341.5 million between 2018-2020. Thanks to 25% of such “fresh money”, the Commission hopes to increase the number of opportunities created by the ESC compared to its predecessors by 40%. Then the panelists expressed the positions of the other EU institutions in regard to the ESC. Pavel Trantina, from the European Economic and Social Committee, explained that his institution regrets a lack of prior consultation by President Jean-Claude Juncker among the European Commission itself before announcing this initiative. He added that the EESC would like to clearly distinguish the ESC in two strands: volunteering on the one hand, and employability on the other hand. The EESC also wants to complement the ESC with further initiatives for the establishment of a coherent eu volunteering policy, which would promote not only “full-time” volunteering through funded placements, but also local volunteering for a few hours a week by all EU citizens, a much more common way of civic engagement.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Agenda EN End of the Plenary Session
    The Week Ahead 25 – 31 May 2020 Plenary and committee meetings - Brussels Plenary and committee meetings - Brussels New long-term EU budget. Commission President Ursula von der Leyen will present the Commission’s revised Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and Recovery Plan proposals and debate with Members in an extraordinary plenary session on Wednesday, from 13:30 to 15:00. Committees Conference on the Future of Europe. The Constitutional Affairs Committee will discuss the next steps towards the planned Conference on the Future of Europe and the EP’s role in it. In their 17 April resolution, MEPs called for the Conference to be Agenda convened as soon as possible, stressing that the EU should engage directly with citizens to bring about a profound reform of the Union (Tuesday). COVID-19/Impact on contract and cross-border workers. The Employment and Social Affairs Committee will debate the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on workers’ mobility, particularly for contract workers and cross-border workers, with Croatian Minister of Labour and Pension System Aladrović, Jobs and Social Rights Commissioner Schmit and Interim Executive Director of the European Labour Authority Curell Gotor (Tuesday). Future of EU tourism. The proposed package on tourism and transport, which includes guidelines on how EU countries could gradually lift travel restrictions, allow businesses to reopen and people to enjoy safely their holidays this summer, will be debated in the Transport and Tourism Committee (Thursday). WHO/COVID-19 outbreak in developing countries. The Development Committee will discuss with Dr Michael Ryan, Executive Director, WHO Health Emergencies Programme, on COVID-19 outbreak in developing countries and its impact on the international humanitarian and development response (Friday).
    [Show full text]
  • EYE2018 Programme 3 FOREWORDS
    European youthevent Programme 1-2 June 2018 Strasbourg #EYE2018 European youthevent Table of content Forewords .................................................................................................................. p. 5 The EYE follow-up ................................................................................................... p. 8 Programme overview ............................................................................................ p. 9 Activity formats ...................................................................................................... p. 10 Extra activities Collective events ............................................................................................................. p. 15 Activities without booking ............................................................................................... p. 18 Drop-in activities ............................................................................................................. p. 30 Artistic performances ...................................................................................................... p. 42 Bookable activities YOUNG AND OLD: Keeping up with the digital revolution ................................................. p. 50 RICH AND POOR: Calling for a fair share .......................................................................... p. 68 APART AND TOGETHER: Working out for a stronger Europe .............................................. p. 92 SAFE AND DANGEROUS: Staying alive in turbulent times ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Overview
    ANNUAL OVERVIEW ANNUAL OVERVIEW 2019 Published by Eurodesk Brussels Link, June 2020 Editor and designer: Zsolt Marton Contributors: Audrey Frith, Grazia Cannarsa, Safi Sabuni, Gheorghe Kraszuk and Eurodesk National Coordinators Proofreading: Denise Tempro This publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriv- atives 4.0 International License. 1 Forewords 6-7 2 About Eurodesk 8 3 Building a strong network 9 4 Working together to improve youth services 10-11 5 Training youth information workers 12-13 6 Awarding outstanding youth work 14-15 7 Building partnerships 16-17 8 Enhancing the European Youth Portal 18 9 Supporting EU youth initiatives 19 10 Contributing to EU youth policies 20-21 11 Reaching out to young people 22-23 12 Eurodesk ecosystem 24-25 13 National level initiatives 26-63 14 Eurodesk 2019 in numbers 64-65 CHAPTER 1 • FOREWORDS MARIYA GABRIEL EUROPEAN COMMISSIONER FOR INNOVATION, RESEARCH, CULTURE, EDUCATION AND YOUTH The new European Commission took up office in December 2019 and got off to a dynamic start in its first 100 days. To prepare Europe for the twin transitions – green and digital – we adopted milestone initiatives, paving the way towards a climate-neutral continent by 2050 and towards Europe’s digital future. By taking a resolutely forward-looking approach, this Commission is working for and with the younger generation, notably through the renewed EU Youth Dialogue. Success in both these important areas depends on the optimal use of our combined brainpower. That, in turn, requires the deepening and extension of the European Education Area and the European Research Area and of the related Erasmus and Horizon Europe programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • Decrypting and [Re-]Building EU Communication: the Quest for Reliable Key-Players
    #04 2014 Public communication in Europe | Communication publique en Europe Focus on Decrypting and [re-]building EU communication: The quest for reliable key-players • Being relevant: detecting trends for government communication • Analysing audiences and their motivation • Crisis communication • Communication and social integration • Southern-Eastern Europe: genesis of a new communication culture Club of Venice | Club de Venise Summary Introduction – Editorial 03 Informality and Truth 05 Summer school on European public communication 07 Unity is not whatever failed us yet 11 Outcome Venice Plenary 13 What is the state of the play on European public communication strategy ? 19 Being relevant - Trends for government communication 22 On the eve of the European elections : perspectives and uncertainties 26 To succeed in Strategic Communications, Analyze your audiences and their motivations 30 Public sector communication in South-East Europe 32 Government communication and cooperation with NGO’s 34 World Forum for democracy 36 Open Government – Open Data So this was cyberutopia ? 40 Analysis of Facebook trends (political authorities pages) 46 Greece is changing – News conference – Athens seminar 27-28 March 2014 48 « Europa nelle lingue del mondo » 52 EESC civil society media seminar 56 EuroPCom 2013 58 « ce qu’ils sont devenus » 60 Seminar on digital communication trends 61 Steering Group and Advisory Group new composition 63 Plenary meeting in Riga – 5-6 June 2014 64 Les textes n’engagent que la responsabilité de leurs auteurs. Ils peuvent
    [Show full text]
  • D2.2 Socio Ethical Analysis and Requirements
    FCT-9-2015: Law Enforcement Capabilities topic 5: Identity Management ARIES "reliAble euRopean Identity EcoSystem" D2.2– Socio ethical analysis and requirements Due date of deliverable: 30-11-2017 Actual submission date: 30-11-2017 Start date of project: 1 September 2016 Duration: 30 months Revision 1.0 Project co-funded by the European Commission within the EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation HORIZON 2020 Dissemination Level PU = Public, fully open, e.g. web CO = Confidential, restricted under conditions set out in Model Grant Agreement CI = Classified, information as referred to in Commission Decision 2001/844/EC. Int = Internal Working Document D2.2 Socio ethical analysis and requirements D2.2 – Socio ethical analysis and requirements Editor Dave Fortune & Juliet Lodge, Saher Ltd Contributors Saher, SONAE , UMU Reviewers Atos, UMU 28-11-2017 Revision 1.0 The work described in this document has been conducted within the project ARIES, started in September 2016. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 700085. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the European Commission. Copyright by the ARIES Consortium. D2.2 Socio ethical analysis and requirements Document History Version Date Author(s) Description/Comments 0.1 21/10/2016 Saher Draft sections 0.2 19/11/2016 Saher Updates to GDPR 0.3 11/12/2016 Saher 0.4 02/01/2017 Saher 0.5 16/01/2017 Saher 0.6 21/01/2017 Saher Ethics
    [Show full text]
  • Bilan 2017-2018
    BILAN 2017-2018 INTRODUCTION D’ENRICO LETTA INTRODUCTION D’IMOLA STREHO Président de l’Institut Jacques Delors, Fondateur de l’Académie Notre Europe Directrice de l’Académie Notre Europe Nous entrons dans la troisième phase du projet d’intégration européenne, et naviguons, une fois n’est pas coutume, en L’Institut Jacques Delors a initié la création de l’Académie Notre Europe lors de l’été 2017. L’Académie a ouvert ses portes eaux troubles. Durant les deux premières phases – l’après-guerre et l’après-effondrement de l’Union soviétique – le chemin en novembre 2017 et propose depuis un parcours de formation modulable en fonction du public. Le parcours se construit à suivre était clair et le vent favorable aux voiles de ce projet qui se développait dans un monde euro-centré, à la fois sur avec des modules d’études, d’échanges avec des experts, des acteurs et faiseurs d’Europe ainsi que des modules de ré- le plan économique et géopolitique. La crise financière de 2008 a mis fin au mythe d’une croissance économique infinie, flexion et d’action sur le projet européen, sa genèse, son histoire, sa géographie et son actualité mais aussi des focus sur remettant anthropologiquement en question le dogme d’ouverture sur lequel la mondialisation et l’intégration européenne des thématiques plus théoriques et transversales sur la démocratie, la place de la société civile, de l’opinion publique ou avaient prospéré jusqu’alors. Ces épreuves économiques ont mis en lumière d’importantes fractures entre les gagnants les liens entre citoyens et institutions de l’UE.
    [Show full text]
  • European Identity 2.0? an Analysis of the European Parliament’S Communication Strategy Via Social Media in the Context of European Identity Building
    University of Twente, School of Management and Governance Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Institut für Politikwissenschaft European Identity 2.0? An analysis of the European Parliament’s communication strategy via social media in the context of European identity building BACHELOR THESIS by Michelle Magaletta Date: 21.09.2015 Student Number: xxxxxxx / xxxxxx B.Sc. European Public Administration / B.A. Public Administration Email: [email protected] / [email protected] Supervisor UTwente: Dr. Ringo Ossewaarde Supervisor WWU: Dr. Alexia Zurkuhlen Table of Contents List of Tables ......................................................................................................... III List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................ IV 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objective ......................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Approach ........................................................................................................ 3 2 A Framework of European Identity and The Web 2.0 ........................................ 4 2.1. Defining Collective European Identity ............................................................. 4 2.1.1 The Significance of European
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Repor T Youth Repor T
    YOUTH REPORT YOUTH REPORT INDEX Editor’s Acknowledgements 2 Introduction 3 Chapter One – Recent Youth Policy Developments in Europe 4 • The European Commission White Paper A New Impetus for European Youth 4 • Resolution of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of 8 the Member States meeting within the Council regarding the Framework of European Cooperation in the Youth Field • The Paneuropean perspective on youth policy: the Council of Europe 18 • Conclusion 23 Chapter Two – Education 24 • Formal Education in the European Union 24 • The Bologna Process 38 • The Value and Contribution of Non-formal Education 41 • How youth organisations can recognise the non-formal learning that takes 43 place in youth organisations • Conclusion 44 Chapter Three – Employment 45 • Conclusion 75 Chapter Four – Social Inclusion 76 • The European Union Social Inclusion Process 84 • Youth Organisations and Social Inclusion 91 • Conclusion 93 Conclusion 94 Bibliography 95 Credits 100 1 EDITOR’S ADCKNOLEDGEMENTS YOUTH REPORT EDITOR’S ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The first acknowledgement that has to be made in this report is to the European Economic and Social Committee who awarded me the François Staedelin scholarship in 2003 to write a report on ‘Youth and European Policies at the Beginning of the 21st Century’. I would like to thank them for their support and interest in youth policy. That report for the EESC has formed the basis for this one. I would also like to thank my colleagues: Anna Sellberg, Roisin Mc Cabe, Emmanuil Vergis and Charlie Faid whose knowledge, skills and expertise have all contributed greatly to the production of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Event European
    European youthevent Programme 1-2 June 2018 Strasbourg #EYE2018 European youthevent Table of content Forewords .................................................................................................................. p. 5 The EYE follow-up ................................................................................................... p. 8 Programme overview ............................................................................................ p. 9 Activity formats ...................................................................................................... p. 10 Extra activities Collective events ............................................................................................................. p. 15 Activities without booking ............................................................................................... p. 18 Drop-in activities ............................................................................................................. p. 30 Artistic performances ...................................................................................................... p. 42 Bookable activities YOUNG AND OLD: Keeping up with the digital revolution ................................................. p. 50 RICH AND POOR: Calling for a fair share .......................................................................... p. 68 APART AND TOGETHER: Working out for a stronger Europe .............................................. p. 92 SAFE AND DANGEROUS: Staying alive in turbulent times ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Model for Open Government in the Eu Acknowledgements
    DEVELOPING A MODEL FOR OPEN GOVERNMENT IN THE EU ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors and the Democratic Society would like to thank all those who willingly gave up their time and energy to be interviewed as part of this project, as well as Andrei Liimets of Open Estonia Foundation and Ovidiu Voicu of the Center for Public Innovation who were our partners and carried out national case studies in Estonia and Romania respectively. REPORT AUTHORS: Michelle Brook, Mat Basford, Niamh Webster, Andy Williamson, and Anthony Zacharzewski, The Democratic Society. Additional input and country research provided by Andrei Liimets (Open Estonia Foundation), and Ovidiu Voicu (Center for Public Innovation, Romania). This report was commissioned by the Open Society European Policy Institute (OSEPI). Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons CC BY license. For more information see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ DEVELOPING A MODEL FOR OPEN GOVERNMENT IN THE EU 1 CONTENTS 1 SUMMARY 2 2 INTRODUCTION 6 3 DEFINING OPEN GOVERNMENT 8 4 OPEN GOVERNMENT AND THE EU INSTITUTIONS 10 5 TRANSPARENCY 14 6 INTEGRITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY 30 7 PARTICIPATION AND CIVIL SOCIETY 40 8 EXPERIENCES OF THE OPEN GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP 56 9 OPTIONS FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE OPEN GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP 68 10 RECOMMENDATIONS 76 ANNEX A – METHOD AND LIMITATIONS 81 2 DEVELOPING A MODEL FOR OPEN GOVERNMENT IN THE EU SUMMARY “Open minds, open societies, and increasingly open systems of government and governance. On the latter, the European Commission aims to lead the way”1 – First Vice-President Timmermans overnments cannot rely on public support – they must earn it.
    [Show full text]
  • EDF Annual Report 2020
    Annual Report 2020 Nothing about us without us Author: Natalia Suárez Editors: Catherine Naughton Contributors: Alejandro Moledo, An Sofie Leenknecht, Gordon Rattray, Haydn Hammersley, Loredana Dicsi, Marie Denninghaus, Marion Steff, Marine Uldry, Mher Hakobyan, Muriel Davia, Raquel Riaza Graphic Design by: Visually Thinking Avenue des Arts 7-8, 1210 Brussels Belgium [email protected] www.edf-feph.org Twitter: @MyEDF This report was co-funded by the European Union’s Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme. The European Union was not involved in the preparation and publication of this report. The European Disability Forum recognises that the opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the position of the European Union. Table of Contents Highlights of our year 5 Who we are 7 Mission and Values 8 Executive Committee Members 10 Board Members 12 Committees and Expert Groups 14 Meet the Team 16 Our members 19 2020 achievements by areas of work 27 Accessibility 28 European Accessibility Act 28 Digital development 28 Transport and the Built environment 29 Children and Youth with disabilities 30 COVID-19 32 Human Rights and non-discrimination 33 International Cooperation and Humanitarian Action 34 Social Policy 36 Women with disabilities 37 Making our voice heard 39 Impact of communication 39 Events 41 Transparency 43 Our partners & close collaborators 43 Financial report 45 4 Annual Report 2020 5 CHAPTER 1 Highlights of our year I am proud to present EDF’s 2020 Annual Report. I would like to dedicate it to all the persons with disabilities who lost their lives, who became ill, or who spent long weeks and months isolated due to COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Volunteering at Ifoam Organics Europe
    European Solidarity Corps VOLUNTEERING AT IFOAM ORGANICS EUROPE A GUIDE FOR CANDIDATES 2021 – 2022 - September 2020 – July 2021 Credits: Carolina Ferreira As an IFOAM Organics Europe volunteer you have an opportunity to experience a two-week stay at an organic farm. Table of Content 1 Project description ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 What is ESC?............................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 About IFOAM Organics Europe ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Who can join the ESC project at IFOAM Organics Europe? .................................................................................... 3 1.4 What to expect from volunteering at IFOAM Organics Europe ............................................................................. 4 1.5 Financial and linguistic support .............................................................................................................................. 4 1.6 Travel and accommodation .................................................................................................................................... 4 1.7 Insurance ................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]