Quick viewing(Text Mode)

Other Reports Template

Other Reports Template

Glenmore Farm, Westbury Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination)

On behalf of Taylor Wimpey UK Limited

Project Ref 27325/013 | Rev: 01 | Date: December 2014

Office Address: Lakeside House, Blackbrook Business Park, Blackbrook Park Avenue, Taunton TA1 2PX T: +44 (0)1823 445 150 F: +44 (0)1823 445 151 E: [email protected]

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

Contents

Summary ...... 1 1 Introduction ...... 3 1.1 Brief ...... 3 1.2 Objective ...... 3 1.3 Scope of Works ...... 3 1.4 Report Format and Sources of Information ...... 3 2 The Site ...... 5 2.1 Site Location ...... 5 2.2 Proposed Development ...... 5 2.3 Site History ...... 5 2.4 Current Site Use ...... 7 2.5 Environmental and Industrial Setting ...... 8 3 Geology, Hydrogeology and Hydrology ...... 10 3.1 Geology ...... 10 3.2 Geological Hazards ...... 11 3.3 Hydrogeology ...... 12 3.4 Hydrology ...... 13 3.5 Groundwater and Surface Water Controls ...... 13 4 Tier 1 Preliminary Risk Assessment ...... 14 4.1 Introduction ...... 14 4.2 Hazard Identification ...... 14 4.3 Hazard Assessment ...... 15 4.4 Risk Estimation ...... 15 4.5 Conclusions and Risk Evaluation ...... 17 4.6 Recommendations...... 17 5 References ...... 18 6 Essential Guidance for Report Readers ...... 19

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore iii Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

Tables

Table 2.1 Summary of Historical Development of Site and Surroundings ...... 7 Table 2.2 Summary of Environmental and Industrial Setting ...... 8 Table 3.1 Summary of Near Surface Ground Conditions ...... 10 Table 3.2: Summary of Geological Hazards (Emap, 2014) ...... 12 Table 3.3: Summary of Groundwater and Surface Water Control ...... 13 Table 4.1: Potential Sources of Contamination (PSC) ...... 14 Table 4.2: Potential Receptors ...... 15

Table A1 – Tier 1 Summary of Estimated Geoenvironmental Risk: Undeveloped Areas of Site Table A2 – Tier 1 Summary of Estimated Geoenvironmental Risk: Developed Areas of Site

Figures

Figure 1 - Site Location Plan Figure 2 - Site Layout and Walkover Plan Figure 3 - Site Walkover Photographs

Appendices

Appendix A Specification for Phase 1 Ground Conditions Assessment Appendix B Historical Ordnance Survey Maps Appendix C Envirolnsight and Geolnsight Reports Appendix D PBA Methodology for Geoenvironmental Risk Assessment

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore iv Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

Summary

Item Description Client Taylor Wimpey UK Limited Site Location Name : Glenmore Farm, Westbury Grid reference : ST 863 528 Site Area: The Site consists of pastoral fields and structures for dwellings, storage or equestrian stables. Objective and This report presents information on ground conditions as required to support Purpose an outline planning application to develop the subject site for residential use. The objective of this report is to identify the likely ground conditions and to assess whether there are potential risks associated with the ground conditions that might require management/mitigation as part of development proposals. Scope of Work This report presents the findings of a Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) comprising a desk study (review of publicly available data), walkover inspection and Tier 1 preliminary qualitative risk assessment. Land Use History On-site current - Equestrian stables, paddocks, open fields and hardstanding for caravan storage. On-site historic - Farm land, farm houses and associated structures. Off-site current - commercial, light industrial, residential, and farmland. Off-site historic – surface mining, industrial, commercial, residential and farmland. Geoenvironmental Topography – The ground slopes upwards from the north west boundary to Setting the centre of the site. From the centre of the site to the south east boundary the ground plateaus although this is partly interrupted by a depression. Geology – The site is underlain by the Oxford Clay Formation (mudstone) in the north-western areas, the Freestone Member (limestone) in the south-eastern areas and the Hazelbury Bryan Formation (mudstone, sandstone or sand) in the southern corner. Hydrogeology – The Oxford Clay Formation is classed as an Unproductive strata whereas the Todber Freestone Member and the Hazelbury Bryan Formation are classified as Secondary A aquifers. Hydrology – There are four surface water features within 250 m of The Site the closest of which is 87 m south east. Groundwater – The site is not located within a Source Protection Zone (SPZ). Hazard Based on the known on-site land use the potential for significant Identification contamination to be present is considered to be Very Low to Low. Based on the known surrounding land uses (commercial) the potential for widespread contamination to be present in the immediate vicinity of the site is considered to be Low. Hazard Potential pollutant linkages have been identified using the information on Assessment potential sources (contaminant types), receptors and exposure pathways. Possible pollutant linkages have been identified for Human Health, Controlled Water and Building/Services. Risk Estimation Based on the information available, the estimated risks have been designated as follows:-  Human Health for on-site current, on-site future, off-site and construction workers or users the risk is Moderate / Low to Very Low.  Controlled Waters – Moderate / Low to Very Low.

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore 1 Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

Item Description  Ecological Systems – Very Low.  Buildings / Services and Property – Very Low. Where a Very Low risk has been estimated, there is low possibility that harm could arise to a designated receptor. Harm, if realised, would not likely be severe. Where a Low risk is identified it is possible that harm could arise to a designated receptor from an identified hazard, but it is unlikely that this harm, if realised, would at worst be mild. Where a Moderate / Low risk has been identified it is possible that harm could arise to a designated receptor from an identified hazard. However, it is either relatively unlikely that any such harm would be severe, or if any harm were to occur it is more likely that the harm would be relatively mild. Recommendation Given the level of risk and the proposed end use it is anticipated that a s geoenvironmental ground investigation is not required to support the outline planning application for development of the site. However the substrata on the south eastern section where a depression is present may possess different engineering characteristics compared to the rest of the site. It is therefore recommended to conduct a ground investigation at this location so an informed decision can be made regarding foundation requirements. This summary forms part of a Phase 1 Ground Condition (Contamination) report prepared by PBA and contains an overview of the key findings and conclusions. The summary should not be treated as an independent document.

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore 2 Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

1 Introduction

1.1 Brief

1.1.1 Peter Brett Associates LLP (PBA) has been instructed by Taylor Wimpey UK Limited (the Client) to undertake a Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) to support a planning application for residential development at the site known as Glenmore Farm, Westbury. A Site Location Plan is presented as Figure 1.

1.2 Objective

1.2.1 The objective of the study is to review readily available information from PBA and public databases to assess the likely ground conditions at the site, and immediate surrounding land, to identify any potential geoenvironmental hazards and constraints to the proposed residential development of the site.

1.2.2 This report is expected to be used in support of an outline planning application. As such reference is made to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and the National Planning Policy Guidance (NPPG).

1.3 Scope of Works

1.3.1 The principal components of this assessment are generally as described in Section 6.2 of BS 10175 (2001) and CLR 11 Model Procedures for the Management of Contaminated Land (EA, 2004). CLR 11 sets out a risk management process based on a tiered risk assessment with an increasing level of detail required to progress through the tiers.

1.3.2 In order to identify the current conditions and land use on the site and in the surrounding area, readily available information in the public domain has been obtained and reviewed, and a site reconnaissance walkover has been carried out. This report presents a review of the acquired information, together with the development of a Preliminary Conceptual Site Model (CSM) and the associated Tier 1 risk assessment. The specification for Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment is presented in Appendix A.

1.4 Report Format and Sources of Information

1.4.1 The findings of a review of readily available published information on the history of the site are presented in Section 2.0. A description of the geology, hydrogeology and hydrology conditions at the site are presented in Section 3.0. An assessment of the geoenvironmental conditions and preliminary geoenvironmental risk assessment of the site are presented in Section 4.0.

1.4.2 In addition, the following sources of data/ study were used in the compilation of this report:

 EMap was commissioned to provide historical Ordnance Survey map extracts at 1:10,000 and 1:2,500 scale covering the site and its immediate environs, together with, environmental sensitivity information. It should be noted that the red line ‘boundary’ shown on the various historical map extracts and environmental dataset is indicative only and the actual boundaries of the study site discussed in this report are as shown on Figure 2.

 Information published by the British Geological Survey (BGS) including 1:50,000 scale geological maps, together with hydrogeological and aquifer vulnerability maps provided in the EnviroInsight Report.

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore 3 Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

 Radon maps published within Building Research Establishment document Radon: Guidance on protective measures for new buildings.

1.4.3 Reference should be made to Section 6.0 of this report for guidance essential to all readers of this report.

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore 4 Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

2 The Site

2.1 Site Location

2.1.1 The Site is centred at approximate National Grid Reference ST 863 528 approximately 1.75km north-west of the centre of Westbury. The location of the site is shown on a Site Location Plan presented as Figure 1.

2.1.2 Topographically, the site is situated in an area of relatively undulating terrain with open fields to the north and east, a railway line followed by the town of Westbury to the south east, and industrial and residential developments to the south west and west of the site. The site itself slopes upwards from the north west boundary to the centre of the site. From the centre of the site to the south east boundary the ground plateaus although this is partly interrupted by a depression.

2.1.3 The site is approximately rectangular in shape and covers an area of approximately 9.8 hectares. The site is bordered to the north and east by roads, residential housing to the south, open fields to the south west and industrial units to the north west.

2.2 Proposed Development

2.2.1 The proposed development for the site is at early concept stage and as such the layout is not yet known. However, it is understood that the site will be utilised for a residential development of up to 145 dwellings with associated roads, infrastructure and public open space.

2.3 Site History

2.3.1 The history of the development of the site and surrounding area has been obtained from a number of readily available Ordnance Survey (OS) maps. Copies of the extracts from the historical and current OS maps are presented in Appendix B; for ease of presentation the OS maps are presented at a reduced scale (from A3 to A4) with duplicate and blank maps omitted.

Map On-site Off-site Edition

The surrounding area appears largely rural in nature with numerous farms and open fields depicted around the site. Roads are depicted adjacent and running parallel to the site’s north east and south east facing boundaries. The site is an open field partitioned into two sections by a hedgerow. On ‘Hawkridge Mill (cloth)’ is annotated 420 1886 the northern section surface water, m north east of the site possibly a pond, is depicted. No A railway track with a north east to south structures are depicted on site. west orientation is depicted 75 m south east of the site. 500 m south of the site Westbury Iron Works is annotated and comprises of numerous structures and railway tracks.

1899- Hawkridge Mill north of the site is No significant change. 1900 annotated as disused.

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore 5 Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

Map On-site Off-site Edition 280 m south east of the site a railway track with an east to west orientation is depicted. Also a tramway (200 m), quarry (280 m) and an old quarry (540 m) are annotated to the south east. 290 m south of the site a quarry is annotated. South east of the site the quarry, A structure and track are depicted in tramway and old quarry are no longer the east corner of the site. The depicted. structure is annotated as South of the site the quarry is no longer 1922 Windyhaugh and the track enters the depicted. site from the north east and 480 m south west of the site a terminates next to the structure. The development comprising filter beds, a track appears to be a footpath. tank and numerous structures is depicted. South east of the site sewage works (360 m) and a railway track (600 m) with a south west to north east orientation A new structure and track entering are depicted. 1939- from the south east perimeter are South of the site a paint works (640 m) 1941 depicted. The structures are now and a sewage works (380 m) are collectively annotated as ‘Glenroy’. depicted Also 480 m south a development previously depicted with filters beds and tanks is now annotated as a cheese factory. 40 m north of the site a railway track with an approximate east to west orientation is depicted. The railway track terminates in a depot to the north of the site. The Westbury Iron Works 500 m south 1956 No significant change. of the site is no longer annotated and many of the structures previously associated with it are absent. A large development of uniformly orientated rectangular structures is depicted 260 m west of the site and is annotated as Depot. Adjacent to the site’s south east and south west boundary numerous A new rectangular structure is residential structures are depicted. 1969 - depicted on the site’s southwest 1970 The railway track 40 m north of the site boundary. is annotated as being dismantled and the associated tracks are no longer depicted.

Pond is no longer depicted on The sewage works 360 m south east of 1972 northern section of the site the site has undergone redevelopment with additional and replacement

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore 6 Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

Map On-site Off-site Edition structures being depicted. A depot with associated structures is depicted 500 m south of the site at the location where the Westbury Iron Works was once depicted. The Cheese Factory 480 m south of the site is now annotated as a Depot. Filter bed and sludge tanks are depicted 270 m south west of the site. 260 m west of the site the Depot is now annotated as West Wilts Trading Estate and some structures previously depicted are absent or have been replaced. Within this site numerous locations are labelled as warehouses, works or poultry houses. 640 m south of the site the paint works is now annotated as Works and Additional structures are depicted in additional structures are depicted. the eastern section of the site and At the West Wilts Trading Estate 260 m 1987 are collectively annotated as west of the site new structures are ‘Glenmore Farm’. depicted. A depot is depicted 150 m north of the site. Sewage works 360 m to the south east has expanded. The sewage works with filter beds and sludge tanks 270 m south west of the 2002 No significant change site is no longer depicted. 40 m west of the site new structures, possibly associated with the West Wilts. Trading Estate, are depicted.

Table 2.1 Summary of Historical Development of Site and Surroundings

2.4 Current Site Use

2.4.1 A site visit was carried out on 17 March 2014 by an engineer from PBA to undertake a walkover to observe current site conditions. The layout of the site, salient notes from the walkover and the location and direction of site photographs are presented as Figure 2. Photographs from the walkover are presented as Figure 3.

2.4.2 The site slopes upwards from the north west boundary to the centre of the site where the stables and other structures are present. From the centre of the site to the south east boundary the ground plateaus, however this is partly interrupted by an acute depression with a north east to south west orientation. The PBA engineer was informed by current land owner that this depression can pool water during heavy rainfall but dissipates within a matter of hours once precipitation has ceased. This depression is suspected of being attributed to either the fault that crosses the site or due to the interface of two outcropping bedrocks (Todber Freestone Member and Hazelbury Bryan Formation) with differing material characteristics (see section 3.1 below).

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore 7 Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

2.4.3 The site is currently used as a residence, equestrian stable and for the storage of recreational caravans. Onsite there are numerous single storey structures that are utilised as paddocks, stables or for the storage of associated equipment. In addition there is a two storey structure with various annexes and out buildings serving as a dwelling. Harding standing is also present surrounding the structures on site. The remainder of the site is open fields and are used for equestrian grazing and accounts for approximately 80 % of the site’s footprint.

2.4.4 The non-residential structures on site are constructed of concrete blocks and corrugated steel sheeting whereas the residential buildings are of brick. None of these structures had evidence of structural fatigue. Hard standing was observed to be either concrete or aggregate and was in a fair condition with no evidence of staining.

2.4.5 Numerous equipment used to support activities undertaken on site were observed, however none of these were deemed to be pertinent sources of contamination. No evidence of fuel or fertiliser storage was observed during the site visit.

2.4.6 Surrounding the site there is a mixture of residential dwellings, farmland, open fields and industrial units. An industrial unit adjacent to the site was observed to be a vehicle repair garage and appeared to maintain good housekeeping.

2.5 Environmental and Industrial Setting

2.5.1 Information on the environmental and industrial setting of the site is presented in a GroundSure EnviroInsight report prepared by EmapsiteTM (EMAP, 2014) and reproduced in Appendix C.

2.5.2 The results of the database search are summarised on the following table and discussed in the following sections.

Number on Site Number within Date Type (1) (1) 250 m of Site

Waste Regulation Landfill Sites 0 (0) 0 (1) Licensed Waste Management Facilities 0 (0) 0 (0)

Statutory Permits/Authorisations Pollution Prevention and Control(2) 0 (0) 0 (0) Radioactive Substance Authorisations 0 (0) 0 (0) Planning Hazardous Substances 0 (0) 0 (0) COMAH Sites(3) 0 0 NIHHS Sites(4) 0 0 Potential Contaminative Uses Fuel Stations 0 0 (1) Trade Directory 0 22 Pollution Incidents 0 3

Table 2.2 Summary of Environmental and Industrial Setting

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore 8 Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

Note: 1) Numbers in brackets denotes number of authorisations, licences or permits that are lapsed, revoked, cancelled, superseded, defunct, surrendered, not applicable, withdrawn or not yet started. 2) Includes Integrated Pollution Controls, Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, Local Authority Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control and Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Control permits. 3) COMAH denotes Control of Major Accident Hazards 4) NIHHS denotes Notification of Installations Handling Hazardous Substances

2.5.3 Statutory Permits/Authorisations/Potential Contaminative Uses: There are a total of twenty two contemporary trade entries within 250 m of the site. The most pertinent of these entries are rubber, silicone and plastic manufacturing, industrial coatings and finishings and vehicle repair, testing and servicing 68 m, 80 m and 90 m north west of the site respectively. The three pollution incidents noted were for discharges of diesel, metal wastes or vehicle parts and were all classed as having a minor impact upon the land. The closest of these incidents was 200 m south east of the site for a discharge of diesel. No sites within 500 m of the site are identified as contaminated land.

2.5.4 Given the distance from the site, the pollution incident involving diesel is not considered to present a risk. The trade entries of rubber, silicone and plastic manufacturing, industrial coatings and finishings, and the vehicle repair operations may pose a risk given their proximity to the site.

2.5.5 Environmentally Sensitive Sites: The closest environmentally sensitive site is an ancient woodland 956 m north east of The Site listed. As such it is deemed that the site is not within close proximity of an environmentally sensitive site.

2.5.6 Within the Groundsure report the site is stated as being not located within a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone (NVZ) or Nitrate Sensitive Area (NSA).

2.5.7 Auxiliary Information: Through a search of historic work undertaken by PBA a contamination survey report for the West Wiltshire Trading Estate, 260 m west of the site was made available. This report from a ground investigation and subsequent chemical analysis of soils, groundwater and surface waters conducted in 1994 identified contamination of arsenic, zinc, hydrocarbons, BTEX and chlorinated solvents. These contaminants were predominantly encountered at boreholes on the western section of the West Wiltshire Trading Estate approximately 800 m west of the site. However, low levels of arsenic were recorded at one location on the eastern section of the West Wiltshire Trading Estate approximately 220 m from the site. Given the distance of the identified contamination and that the site is up gradient of the West Wiltshire Trading Estate this contamination is not deemed as being a risk to the site.

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore 9 Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

3 Geology, Hydrogeology and Hydrology

3.1 Geology

Superficial Deposits

3.1.1 The 1:50 000 scale geological map of the area (BGS, 1985) and the Groundsure report indicate that there are no superficial deposits on site. An extract of the geological map is included in the GeoInsight Report (EMAP, 2014) presented in Appendix C.

Solid Geology

3.1.2 The geological map (BGS 1995) and Groundsure report indicate that the majority of the site is underlain by the Oxford Clay Formation. However, the south east quarter is underlain by the Todber Freestone Member with a small section on the southern corner underlain by the Hazelbury Bryan Formation. From the succession depicted on the geological map it is interpreted that that the Oxford Clay underlies both the Todber Freestone Member and the Hazelbury Bryan Formation.

3.1.3 The Oxford Clay Formation is described by the British Geological Survey (BGS Website, 2014) as grey, generally smooth to slightly silty with sporadic limestone nodules, mudstone. The Todber Freestone Member is described (BGS Website, 2014) as fine to medium grained, well sorted, commonly cross bedded limestone. The Hazelbury Bryan Formation is described (BGS Website, 2014) as a grey to brown, sandy mudstone, muddy sandstone or very fine to medium grained sand.

Geological Structures

3.1.4 A fault with a north east to south west orientation is depicted on geological maps crossing the south east section of the site. The fault is identified as the Heywood fault and downthrows to the south east. There are no other faults depicted within 500 m of the site.

Borehole Records

3.1.5 There are no historical borehole records available from the British Geological website for the site. Approximately 1 km the north east a ground investigation was conducted by Wiltshire County Council in support of the construction of a new road bridge. Two boreholes were sunk up to 8.5 m bgl. A summary of the ground conditions encountered by these boreholes are detailed below.

Description Depth range* Stratum**

Soft to firm, grey or grey and brown silty or very sandy CLAY with 0.0 – 2.8m bgl Weathered Oxford Clay formation gravels or shell fragments. Stiff becoming hard grey silty CLAY 2.7 – 4.0m bgl Oxford Clay Formation

Table 3.1 Summary of Near Surface Ground Conditions

Note: (*m bgl – metres below ground level. ** PBA interpretation of ground conditions.)

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore 10 Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

3.2 Geological Hazards

Natural and Mining Cavities

3.2.1 The Groundsure report states that no mining, extraction or natural cavities are identified within a 1 km radius of the site.

3.2.2 A search of the PBA Natural Cavities Database indicated that there are no natural cavity locations recorded within 2km of the site centre. The nearest recorded natural cavity is located 8.7km to the north-west

3.2.3 Also a search of the PBA Non-Coal Mining Cavities Database indicated that there are no recorded non-coal mining related cavities within 2km of the site centre. The nearest recorded non-coal mining related cavity is located 8km to the north north-west.

3.2.4 However, it is noted within the Groundsure report and from an internet search (Wiltshire Council Website) that surface mining for ironstone and limestone has occurred to the east, south east and south of the Site as close as 250 m to the site boundary. These surface mining locations are interpreted to be the quarries identified in Table 2.1.

3.2.5 The absence of records does not, in itself, demonstrate that natural or mining cavities are not present on the Site, and it should be noted that surface mining for ironstone and limestone has been conducted near the site. However, it is anticipated that the potential for subterranean mining cavities is very low.

Radon

3.2.6 Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas and emanates from certain geological formations to varying degrees, depending on the type, porosity and permeability. The radon guidance notes (BRE, 2007) presents a series of maps that determine the level of protection that new dwellings are required to have for protection from radon.

3.2.7 The guidance notes (BRE, 2007) indicate that the site is situated in an area where radon protection measures are not required for new dwellings.

Adverse Foundation Conditions

3.2.8 An assessment of potential geological hazards that may give rise to instability or adverse foundation or construction conditions as supplied by the British Geological Survey (BGS) from their National Geoscience Information Service (NGIS) is presented in the EnviroInsight Report reproduced in Appendix C. The assessment is generated automatically based on digital geological maps and the scope and the accuracy is limited by the methods used to create the dataset and is therefore only indicative for the search area.

3.2.9 The information contained in the EnviroInsight Report has been reviewed and where considered necessary reassessed considering the specific information available for the site. The modified assessment of the potential for geological hazards to be present on the site is summarised in table below.

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore 11 Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

BGS Hazard Hazard PBA Opinion/Comment Potential PBA concurs with this designation. The Moderate designation is related to the weathered Oxford Clays Potential for present across the north-western parts of the site, which Shrinking or can be subject to shrinkage/swelling on changes in soil Negligible to Swelling Clay moisture content. The Negligible designation relates to the Moderate Ground Stability limestone, sandstone and sandy mudstones of the Todber Hazards Freestone Member and the Hazelbury Bryan Formation present across the south-eastern parts of the site. Potential for Landslide Ground Very Low PBA concurs with this designation. Stability Hazards This designation is based upon the presence of Potential for soluble rock. On the Groundsure map the Todber Ground Null – Freestone Member limestone is identified on the Dissolution Negligible south east section of the site and will possess some Stability Hazards soluble characteristics. As such PBA suggest that this designation should be Low Potential Compressible Negligible PBA concurs with this designation. Ground Stability Hazards Potential for Collapsible Very Low PBA concurs with this designation. Hazards Potential for Negligible PBA concurs with this designation. Running sand Table 3.2: Summary of Geological Hazards (Emap, 2014)

3.3 Hydrogeology

3.3.1 The Groundsure report states that the bedrock onsite is classed as an unproductive strata in the northern parts of the site and a Secondary A aquifer in the southern parts of the site. These designations are interpreted to be the Oxford Clay Formation and the Todber Freestone Member respectively. Unproductive strata are described by the Environment Agency as formations of rock layers or drift deposits with low permeability’s that have negligible significance for water supply or river base flow. Secondary A aquifers are described by the Environment Agency as permeable layers capable of supporting water supplies at a local rather that strategic scale and in some cases forming an important source of base flow to rivers.

3.3.2 The Groundsure report indicates that the permeability of the site’s bedrock is either Very Low to Low or High. The high permeability is interpreted to relate to the Hazelbury Bryan Formation and the Todber Freestone Member whereas the Very Low to Low relates to the Oxford Clay Formation. It should be noted that these are indicative permeability’s and do not relate to any quantified permeability.

3.3.3 The latest indicative maps included in the EnviroInsight Report (EMAP, 2014) indicate that the site is not located in a Groundwater Source Protection Zone. Groundwater source protection zones are defined as the groundwater catchment zones for significant public water supply and private wells or boreholes that supply water to potable or equivalent standards.

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore 12 Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

3.3.4 Given the characteristically low permeability of the Oxford Clay Formation, the use of infiltration drainage would not be feasible across the northern section of the site. However, where the Todber Freestone Member limestone and the variable deposits of the Hazelbury Bryan Formation outcrop in south eastern and southern parts of the site, permeability will be higher and there may be potential to utilise infiltration drainage in these areas. This potential would require assessment by ground investigation in order to demonstrate ground permeability prior to adoption of infiltration within any drainage strategy. If found to be favourable, then infiltration drainage infrastructure should consider the potentially soluble characteristics of the limestone bedrock and should therefore be located at a suitable distance away from any structures.

3.4 Hydrology

3.4.1 The Groundsure identifies four surface waters features within 250 m of the site, the closest of which is 87 m south east

3.4.2 The Groundsure report also lists numerous entries for River Networks north east of the site ranging in distance from 380 m to 460 m. These entries are for rivers or culverts that appear to feed into Bitham Brook.

3.4.3 The site is not identified as being on or within 250 m of an Environment Agency identified flood plain.

3.5 Groundwater and Surface Water Controls

3.5.1 Information on groundwater and surface water controls is presented in the EnviroInsight Report prepared by Emapsite (EMAP, 2014) and reproduced in Appendix C.

3.5.2 The results of the database search are summarised on the following table and discussed below:

Number on Site Number within Groundwater and Surface Water Controls (1) (1) 1000m of Site

Groundwater Abstractions 0 (0) 0 (0) Surface Water Abstractions 0 (0) 0 (0) Discharge Consents 0 (0) 12 (4) Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters (2) 0 0

Table 3.3: Summary of Groundwater and Surface Water Control

Notes: 1) Numbers in brackets denotes number of authorisations, licences or permits that are lapsed, revoked, cancelled, superseded, defunct, surrendered, not applicable or not yet started. 2) Includes water impact entries on the Substantiated Pollution Incident Register

3.5.3 Discharge Consents: There are twelve discharge consents listed within the report which equate to eight active licences. The active licences are for sewage or miscellaneous discharges to either ditches, groundwater or tributaries of the Biss Brook or River Biss

3.5.4 The proposed development is not anticipated to impact upon or be impacted by these discharges.

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore 13 Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

4 Tier 1 Preliminary Risk Assessment

4.1 Introduction

4.1.1 The methodology and criteria used to assess risk adopted by PBA as used within this document is defined within Appendix D. This methodology is in general accordance with relevant technical guidance as presented in the Contaminated Land Reports CLR 11 (EA, 2004).

4.1.2 The risk assessment includes the development of a Conceptual Site Model (CSM) that describes the types of potential contamination sources. The identification of potential receptors and potential pathways has also been undertaken. For a pollutant linkage to be identified all three elements (i.e. a source, pathway and receptor) must be present.

4.2 Hazard Identification

Previous and Current Site Use

4.2.1 From the historical maps the site has undergone minimal development with a few structures depicted on the eastern section of the site. It is assumed that these structures, together with the wider site area, have been utilised for agricultural purposes.

4.2.2 Usage surrounding the site appears to have been a mixture of agricultural and industrial with more recent commercial and residential developments. Notable historical developments or activities surrounding the site are the Westbury Iron Works to the south, railway tracks to the north and east, and the West Wiltshire Trading Estate and Depot to the west.

4.2.3 Based on this known history of the site, the surrounding land and the walkover undertaken as part of this study, the overall potential for widespread significant contamination to be present at the site is considered to be Very Low for the open fields and Low for the eastern section of the site due to the storage of vehicles and potential storage of herbicides and pesticides.

4.2.4 Based on the known surrounding land uses, notably the proximity of the dismantled railway and West Wiltshire Trading Estate to the site, potential for wide spread contamination to be present in the immediate vicinity of the site is considered to be Low.

Summary of Potential Sources of Contamination (PSC)

4.2.5 Potential Sources of Contamination (PSC) identified on the site or within the vicinity of The Site are described on the following table:

PSC Description Agricultural and Potential for low level residual concentrations of contaminants 1 Vehicle use (on typically hydrocarbons from usage of agricultural plant and site) storage of vehicles onsite and herbicides and pesticides Backfilled Pond Pond historically depicted on site potentially back filled with fill 2 (on site) of variable composition. Hence risk of asbestos, hydrocarbons and metals. Railway Tracks Potential for arsenic, asbestos, hydrocarbons, metals and 2 (40 m north of site) PCBs. West Wiltshire Trading Estate and Potential for asbestos, BTEXs, hydrocarbons, metals, PAHs, 3 Depot phenols and VOCs. (40 m west of site) Table 4.1: Potential Sources of Contamination (PSC)

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore 14 Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

4.3 Hazard Assessment

Potential Receptors

4.3.1 It is understood that it is intended to develop the site for residential use. It is not known yet whether this will include gardens however to maintain a conservative approach it is assumed that gardens and landscaping will be present. Details of the potential receptors considered and whether or not the receptor is plausible are presented in the following table:

Potential Receptor Type Comment Receptor? (Y/N) Human End User Current = Site Operator Y End User Future = Residential with gardens Y Off Site = Residential, Construction Workers Y Surface Waters Surface waters south east of The Site Y Groundwater The site is underlain by an Unproductive and Y Secondary A aquifers. Buildings / Materials Structures are proposed as part of the development. Y Property - including Current = Livestock and buildings Y crops, livestock, Future = Residential buildings. Y buildings etc. Ecological Systems None identified N Table 4.2: Potential Receptors

Potential Pathways

4.3.2 Potential environmental hazards need a pathway connecting the source (if present) to potential receptors in order to be able to impact upon the receptors. These pathways are capable of conveying the contaminants. Pathways may be anthropogenic (artificial) or natural.

4.3.3 Anthropogenic pathways are artificial routes capable of conveying contaminants and include such routes as surface water drains, high permeability backfill materials, poorly consolidated Made Ground, foundations and persons disturbing contamination sources in such a way as to liberate contaminants.

4.3.4 In the case of persons working with contaminated ground (e.g. to lay foundations or install services) direct contact with the source becomes possible, and pathways such as dermal contact, inhalation or ingestion require consideration.

4.3.5 The site is shown to be underlain by the Oxford Clay Formation in the northern areas, Todber Freestone Formation in the south-eastern areas and the Hazelbury Bryan Formation at the south east corner. Downward and lateral migration of contaminants through the Oxford Clay is likely to be limited whereas the Hazelbury Bryan and Todber Freestone formations are likely to exhibit permeability’s that deem contamination migration likely. In addition the Heywood Fault that crosses the site is likely to enhance contamination migration through the underlying strata in this area.

4.4 Risk Estimation

4.4.1 When there is a pollutant linkage (and therefore some measure of risk) it is necessary to determine whether the risk matters and therefore whether further action is required. PBA provide an estimation of the level of risk but do not comment on whether or not it is an unacceptable risk, because the significance or acceptability of a risk depends on the individual

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore 15 Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

stakeholder. Risk estimation involves predicting the likely consequence (what degree of harm might result) and the probability that the consequences will arise (how likely the outcome is).

4.4.2 The tables included in Appendix E of the report present assessments of consequence and probability for each potential pollutant linkage identified. Table A1 presents assessments associated with the undeveloped areas of the site i.e. open fields where the hazard classification is Very Low (score ‘1’) and Table A2 presents assessments associated with the developed area i.e. buildings and hard standing where the hazard classification is Low (score “2”).

4.4.3 Based on the information available, there are a limited number of plausible pollutant linkages. The risks associated with the site-wide ground conditions have been estimated as follows:

4.4.4 Table A1: Undeveloped Area of Site

 Human Health (On-site Current) – Very Low

 Human Health (On-site Future) – Very Low

 Human Health (Off site) – Very Low

 Human Health (On-site construction) – Very Low

 Groundwater – Low

 Surface Water – Very Low

 Buildings – Very Low

 Ecological Systems – Very Low

 Property – Very Low

4.4.5 Table A2: Developed Area of Site

 Human Health (On-site Current) – Moderate / Low

 Human Health (On-site Future) – Moderate / Low

 Human Health (Off site) – Low

 Human Health (On-site construction) – Low

 Groundwater – Moderate / Low

 Surface Water – Very Low

 Buildings – Very Low

 Ecological Systems – Very Low

 Property – Very Low

4.4.6 Possible pollutant linkages are determined using professional judgement. If a linkage is considered possible, it is considered that this represents a potentially ‘unacceptable risk’ and therefore requires further consideration. This may be through remediation or mitigation or through further tiers of investigation and assessment.

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore 16 Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

4.4.7 Possible pollutant linkages have been identified for human health, buildings and controlled waters. For the site’s developed area the risks to human health have been determined to be Moderate / Low to Low, for groundwater Moderate / Low and for surface water, buildings and property Very Low.

4.4.8 For the site’s undeveloped area the risks to human health have been identified as Very Low, for groundwater Low and for surface water, buildings and property Very Low.

4.5 Conclusions and Risk Evaluation

4.5.1 The results of this Ground Condition Assessment consider that as a whole the site is considered to have Low to Very Low potential for ground contamination to be present and presents a resultant Moderate / Low to Very Low geoenvironmental risk.

4.5.2 Where a Moderate / Low risk has been identified it is possible that harm could arise to a designated receptor from an identified hazard. However, it is either relatively unlikely that any such harm would be severe, or if any harm were to occur it is more likely that the harm would be relatively mild. Where a Very Low risk has been estimated, there is low possibility that harm could arise to a designated receptor. Harm, if realised, would not likely be severe. Where a Low risk has been determined it is possible that harm could arise to a designated receptor from an identified hazard, but it is likely that this harm, if realised, would at worst normally be mild.

4.5.3 Given the level of risk and the proposed end use it is anticipated that a geoenvironmental ground investigation is not required to support the outline planning application for development of the site. Any requirement to carry out a Phase 2 geoenvironmental intrusive investigation can be satisfactorily dealt with by incorporation of a suitable Condition in any granted Outline Planning Consent.

4.5.4 This risk assessment and Conceptual Site Model should be reviewed and updated following any Phase 2 intrusive investigation.

4.6 Recommendations

4.6.1 Based on the outcomes of this report a geoenvironmental ground investigation is not required. However, it is suggested that any future assessment of the site’s suitability for development should take into consideration the depression on the south east section of the site. This depression is suspected of being attributed to either the fault that crosses the site or due to the interface of two outcropping bedrocks with differing material characteristics. Hence, the substrata at this location may possess different engineering characteristics compared to the rest of the site and it is therefore recommended to conduct a ground investigation at this location so an informed decision can be made regarding foundation requirements.

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore 17 Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

5 References

BGS, 1989 1:50,000 scale Geological Map of & Wales, Solid and Drift, Sheet 281 Frome. British Geological Survey, Keyworth.

BRE (2007) Radon: Guidance on protective measures for new buildings. Report BR211, Building Research Establishment, Garston, Hertfordshire.

DCLG (2012) National Planning Policy Framework. Department for Communities and Local Government, London.

EA (2004) Model Procedures for the Management of Land Contamination. Contaminated Land Report CLR11. Environment Agency, Bristol. ISBN 1844322955.

ELECTRONIC Wiltshire County Council, Wiltshire Community History. Available at http://history.wiltshire.gov.uk/community/getfaq.php?id=43

ELECTRONIC British Geological Survey, The BGS Lexicon of Named Rock Units. Available at http://www.bgs.ac.uk/lexicon/

EMAP (2014) GroundSure EnviroInsight Report, Land at Glenmore Farm, Westbury. reference EMS-239947_320585 dated 3 March 2014. EmapSite, Eversley.

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore 18 Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

6 Essential Guidance for Report Readers

i. This report has been prepared within an agreed timeframe and to an agreed budget that will necessarily apply some constraints on its content and usage. The remarks below are presented to assist the reader in understanding the context of this report and any general limitations or constraints. If there are any specific limitations and constraints they are described in the report text.

ii. The opinions and recommendations expressed in this report are based on statute, guidance, and appropriate practice current at the date of its preparation. Peter Brett Associates LLP (PBA) does not accept any liability whatsoever for the consequences of any future legislative changes or the release of subsequent guidance documentation, etc. Such changes may render some of the opinions and advice in this report inappropriate or incorrect and we will be pleased to advise if any report requires revision due to changing circumstances, especially those over one year old. Following delivery of any report PBA has no obligation to advise the Client or any other party of such changes or their repercussions.

iii. Some of the conclusions in this report may be based on third party data. No guarantee can be given for the accuracy or completeness of any of the third party data used. Historical maps and aerial photographs provide a “snap shot” in time about conditions or activities at the site and cannot be relied upon as indicators of any events or activities that may have taken place at other times.

iv. The conclusions and recommendations made in this report and the opinions expressed are based on the information reviewed and/or the ground conditions encountered in exploratory holes and the results of any field or laboratory testing undertaken. There may be ground conditions at the site that have not been disclosed by the information reviewed or by the investigative work undertaken. Such undisclosed conditions cannot be taken into account in any analysis and reporting.

v. It should be noted that groundwater levels, groundwater chemistry, surface water levels, surface water chemistry, soil gas concentrations and soil gas flow rates can vary due to seasonal, climatic, tidal and manmade effects.

vi. This report has been written for the sole use of the Client stated at the front of the report in relation to a specific development or scheme. The conclusions and recommendations presented herein are only relevant to the scheme or the phase of project under consideration. This report shall not be relied upon or transferred to any other party without the express written authorisation of PBA. Any such party relies upon the report at its own risk.

vii. The interpretation carried out in this report is based on scientific and engineering appraisal carried out by suitably experienced and qualified technical consultants based on the scope of our engagement. We have not taken into account the perceptions of, for example, banks, insurers, other funders, lay people, etc., unless the report has been prepared specifically for that purpose. Advice from other specialists may be required such as the legal, planning and architecture professions, whether specifically recommended in our report or not.

viii. Public or legal consultations or enquiries, or consultation with any Regulatory Bodies (such as the Environment Agency, Natural England or Local Authority) have taken place only as part of this work where specifically stated.

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore 19 Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore 20 Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

Tables

 Table A1 – Tier 1 Summary of Estimated Geoenvironmental Risk: Undeveloped Areas of Site  Table A2 – Tier 1 Summary of Estimated Geoenvironmental Risk: Developed Areas of Site

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

PROJECT TITLE Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment Table Summarising Pollutant Linkages and Risk Estimation Site hazard classification / score: Very Low (1) PSC Reference and Hazard Classification

Present (Y/N) & Present EPH & Ground Consequence (Hazard Receptor Sensitivity Pathway PAH Metals Inorganic Biocides Radioactivity Probability Estimated Risk (Y/N) Solvent Gas Classification x Sensitivity) Value - Ingestion of fruit or vegetable leaf or roots N x x √ x √ √ x - - - - Ingestion of contaminated drinking water N √ √ x x √ √ x - - - - Ingestion of water / sediments when swimming N √ √ √ √ √ √ x - - - 5 Ingestion of soil/dust indoors Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 5 Low Likelihood Very Low Human Health - 5 Ingestion of soil/dust outdoors Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 5 Low Likelihood Very Low On-Site Current 5 Inhalation of particles (dust / soil) indoor and outdoor Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 5 Low Likelihood Very Low Users 5 Inhalation of vapours/gases – outdoor Y √ x x x x √ √ 5 Low Likelihood Very Low 5 Inhalation of vapours/gases - indoor Y √ x x x x √ √ 5 Low Likelihood Very Low 5 Dermal absorption via direct contact with soil Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 5 Low Likelihood Very Low - Dermal absorption via waters (swimming / showering) N √ √ √ √ √ √ x - - - 5 Ingestion of fruit or vegetable leaf or roots Y x x √ x √ √ x 5 Low Likelihood Very Low 5 Ingestion of contaminated drinking water Y √ √ x x √ √ x 5 Low Likelihood Very Low - Ingestion of water / sediments when swimming N √ √ x x √ √ x - - - 5 Ingestion of soil/dust indoors Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x - Low Likelihood Very Low Human Health - 5 Ingestion of soil/dust outdoors Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 5 Low Likelihood Very Low On-Site Future 5 Inhalation of particles (dust / soil) indoor and outdoor Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 5 Low Likelihood Very Low User 5 Inhalation of vapours – outdoor Y √ x x x x √ √ 5 Low Likelihood Very Low 5 Inhalation of vapours - indoor Y √ x x x x √ √ 5 Low Likelihood Very Low 5 Dermal absorption via direct contact with soil Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 5 Low Likelihood Very Low 5 Dermal absorption via waters (swimming / showering) Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 5 Low Likelihood Very Low 5 Ingestion of fruit or vegetable leaf or roots Y x x √ x √ √ x 5 Unlikely Very Low 5 Ingestion of contaminated drinking water Y √ √ x x √ √ x 5 Unlikely Very Low - Ingestion of water / sediments when swimming N √ √ x x √ √ x - - - 5 Ingestion of soil/dust indoors Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 5 Unlikely Very Low Human Health - 5 Ingestion of soil/dust outdoors Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 5 Unlikely Very Low Off-Site 5 Inhalation of particles (dust / soil) indoor and outdoor Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 5 Unlikely Very Low 5 Inhalation of vapours – outdoor Y √ x x x x √ √ 5 Unlikely Very Low 5 Inhalation of vapours - indoor Y √ x x x x √ √ 5 Unlikely Very Low 5 Dermal absorption via direct contact with soil Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 5 Unlikely Very Low 5 Dermal absorption via waters (swimming / showering) Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 5 Unlikely Very Low 4 Ingestion of soil/dust indoors Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 4 Low Likelihood Very Low Human Health - 4 Ingestion of soil/dust outdoors Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 4 Low Likelihood Very Low Construction/ 4 Inhalation of particles (dust / soil) outdoor Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 4 Low Likelihood Very Low Maintenance 4 Inhalation of vapours – outdoor Y √ x x x x √ √ 4 Low Likelihood Very Low Workers* 4 Inhalation of vapours - indoor Y √ x x x x √ √ 4 Low Likelihood Very Low 4 Dermal absorption via direct contact with soil Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 4 Low Likelihood Very Low 3 Leaching Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 3 Likely Low Groundwater 3 Migration via natural or anthropogenic Y √ √ √ √ √ √ √ 3 Likely Low 2 Direct runoff or discharges from pipes Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 2 Low Likelihood Very Low Surface Water 2 Indirect via recharge from groundwater (hydraulic flow) Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 2 Low Likelihood Very Low 2 Deposition of wind blown dust Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 2 Unlikely Very Low 1 Direct contact Y √ √ x x x x x 1 Low Likelihood Very Low Buildings 1 Explosion due to gas migration via natural or anthropogenic Y √ x x x x x √ 1 Low Likelihood Very Low 1 Direct deposition of particles / dust - wind blown or flood Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 1 Low Likelihood Very Low Ecological 1 Indirect - through watering Y √ √ √ x x √ x 1 Low Likelihood Very Low Systems 1 Inhalation of gases/vapours or particulates/dust by animals Y √ √ √ x x √ √ 1 Low Likelihood Very Low 1 Ingestion of of vegetation / water / soil by animals Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 1 Low Likelihood Very Low - Direct deposition via wind or flood N √ √ √ √ √ √ x - - - - Indirect through watering N √ √ √ x x √ x - - - Property 1 Inhalation of gas / vapour / particulates / dust 1 √ x x x x √ √ 1 Low Likelihood Very Low 1 Ingestion of vegetation / water / soil by animals 1 √ √ √ √ √ √ x 1 Low Likelihood Very Low * It is assumed that construction workers will undergo appropriate heath and safety training and wear personal protective equipment in conjunction with appropriate hygene facilities. Risk estimation establishes the magnitude and probability of the possible consequences (what degree of harm might result and how likely). The criteria for classifying probability and consequence are set out in Tables 3 and 4 of the PBA methodology. Green text highlights one or more elements of the Pollutant Linkage are missing and therefore eliminated

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\App E - Tables\Copy of Table of estimated risk - 27325 A1 PROJECT TITLE Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment Table Summarising Pollutant Linkages and Risk Estimation Site hazard classification / score: Low (2) PSC Reference and Hazard Classification

Present (Y/N) & Present EPH & Ground Consequence (Hazard Receptor Sensitivity Pathway PAH Metals Inorganic Biocides Radioactivity Probability Estimated Risk (Y/N) Solvent Gas Classification x Sensitivity) Value - Ingestion of fruit or vegetable leaf or roots N x x √ x √ √ x - - - - Ingestion of contaminated drinking water N √ √ x x √ √ x - - - - Ingestion of water / sediments when swimming N √ √ √ √ √ √ x - - - 5 Ingestion of soil/dust indoors Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 10 Low Likelihood Moderate / Low Human Health - 5 Ingestion of soil/dust outdoors Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 10 Low Likelihood Moderate / Low On-Site Current 5 Inhalation of particles (dust / soil) indoor and outdoor Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 10 Low Likelihood Moderate / Low Users 5 Inhalation of vapours/gases – outdoor Y √ x x x x √ √ 10 Low Likelihood Moderate / Low 5 Inhalation of vapours/gases - indoor Y √ x x x x √ √ 10 Low Likelihood Moderate / Low 5 Dermal absorption via direct contact with soil Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 10 Low Likelihood Moderate / Low - Dermal absorption via waters (swimming / showering) N √ √ √ √ √ √ x - - - 5 Ingestion of fruit or vegetable leaf or roots Y x x √ x √ √ x 10 Low Likelihood Moderate / Low 5 Ingestion of contaminated drinking water Y √ √ x x √ √ x 10 Low Likelihood Moderate / Low - Ingestion of water / sediments when swimming N √ √ x x √ √ x - - - 5 Ingestion of soil/dust indoors Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x - Low Likelihood Moderate / Low Human Health - 5 Ingestion of soil/dust outdoors Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 10 Low Likelihood Moderate / Low On-Site Future 5 Inhalation of particles (dust / soil) indoor and outdoor Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 10 Low Likelihood Moderate / Low User 5 Inhalation of vapours – outdoor Y √ x x x x √ √ 10 Low Likelihood Moderate / Low 5 Inhalation of vapours - indoor Y √ x x x x √ √ 10 Low Likelihood Moderate / Low 5 Dermal absorption via direct contact with soil Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 10 Low Likelihood Moderate / Low 5 Dermal absorption via waters (swimming / showering) Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 10 Low Likelihood Moderate / Low 5 Ingestion of fruit or vegetable leaf or roots Y x x √ x √ √ x 10 Unlikely Low 5 Ingestion of contaminated drinking water Y √ √ x x √ √ x 10 Unlikely Low - Ingestion of water / sediments when swimming N √ √ x x √ √ x - - - 5 Ingestion of soil/dust indoors Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 10 Unlikely Low Human Health - 5 Ingestion of soil/dust outdoors Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 10 Unlikely Low Off-Site 5 Inhalation of particles (dust / soil) indoor and outdoor Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 10 Unlikely Low 5 Inhalation of vapours – outdoor Y √ x x x x √ √ 10 Unlikely Low 5 Inhalation of vapours - indoor Y √ x x x x √ √ 10 Unlikely Low 5 Dermal absorption via direct contact with soil Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 10 Unlikely Low 5 Dermal absorption via waters (swimming / showering) Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 10 Unlikely Low 4 Ingestion of soil/dust indoors Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 8 Low Likelihood Low Human Health - 4 Ingestion of soil/dust outdoors Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 8 Low Likelihood Low Construction/ 4 Inhalation of particles (dust / soil) outdoor Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 8 Low Likelihood Low Maintenance 4 Inhalation of vapours – outdoor Y √ x x x x √ √ 8 Low Likelihood Low Workers* 4 Inhalation of vapours - indoor Y √ x x x x √ √ 8 Low Likelihood Low 4 Dermal absorption via direct contact with soil Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 8 Low Likelihood Low 3 Leaching Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 6 Likely Moderate / Low Groundwater 3 Migration via natural or anthropogenic Y √ √ √ √ √ √ √ 6 Likely Moderate / Low 2 Direct runoff or discharges from pipes Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 4 Low Likelihood Very Low Surface Water 2 Indirect via recharge from groundwater (hydraulic flow) Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 4 Low Likelihood Very Low 2 Deposition of wind blown dust Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 4 Unlikely Very Low 1 Direct contact Y √ √ x x x x x 2 Low Likelihood Very Low Buildings 1 Explosion due to gas migration via natural or anthropogenic Y √ x x x x x √ 2 Low Likelihood Very Low 1 Direct deposition of particles / dust - wind blown or flood Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 2 Low Likelihood Very Low Ecological 1 Indirect - through watering Y √ √ √ x x √ x 2 Low Likelihood Very Low Systems 1 Inhalation of gases/vapours or particulates/dust by animals Y √ √ √ x x √ √ 2 Low Likelihood Very Low 1 Ingestion of of vegetation / water / soil by animals Y √ √ √ √ √ √ x 2 Low Likelihood Very Low - Direct deposition via wind or flood N √ √ √ √ √ √ x - - - - Indirect through watering N √ √ √ x x √ x - - - Property 1 Inhalation of gas / vapour / particulates / dust 1 √ x x x x √ √ 2 Low Likelihood Very Low 1 Ingestion of vegetation / water / soil by animals 1 √ √ √ √ √ √ x 2 Low Likelihood Very Low * It is assumed that construction workers will undergo appropriate heath and safety training and wear personal protective equipment in conjunction with appropriate hygene facilities. Risk estimation establishes the magnitude and probability of the possible consequences (what degree of harm might result and how likely). The criteria for classifying probability and consequence are set out in Tables 3 and 4 of the PBA methodology. Green text highlights one or more elements of the Pollutant Linkage are missing and therefore eliminated

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\App E - Tables\Table of estimated risk - 27325 A2 Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

Figures

 Figure 1 - Site Location Plan  Figure 2 - Site Layout and Walkover Plan  Figure 3 - Site Walkover Photographs

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Client Date 05.03.2014 Taylor Wimpey Developments Land at A4 Scale 1:20,000 Glenmore Farm, Westbury Drawn by SMC Checked by AB Offices throughout the UK and Europe Reproduced from/based upon Ordnance Survey material with the Figure Number www.peterbrett.com permission of Ordnance Survey ® on behalf of The Controller of Her Site Location Plan Majesty's Stationery Office. © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised © Peter Brett Associates LLP reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or TAUNTON civil proceedings. Licence No. ??????????? Year of Publication ???? Figure 1 Tel: 01823 445150 Owner/Purchaser of Mapping ? user name: stacey clifford File Location: j:\27325 glenmore farm, westbury\location plan\glenmore farm, westbury - location plan.dwg 5

6 Horse Paddock

4 3 Caravan Storage on Hard Standing

Stables 7

2 1

10

9 8

Depression

KEY

1 Photograph Position (1-10) 0 50

metres

Client Date 07.04.2014 GLENMORE FARM, WESTBURY Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd A3 Scale 1:1250 Drawn by davco SITE LAYOUT PLAN Checked by KS Offices throughout the UK and Europe Reproduced from/based upon Ordnance Survey material with the Figure Number www.peterbrett.com permission of Ordnance Survey ® on behalf of The Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised © Peter Brett Associates LLP reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or READING civil proceedings. Licence No. 100021575 Year of Publication 2014 2 Tel: 0118 950 0761 Owner/Purchaser of Mapping PBA LLP user name: david cotton File Location: j:\27325 - glenmore farm,westbury\geo\cad & graphics\cad\dwgs\figure 2 site layout plan.dwg

Photo 1: South east corner of site

Photo 2:Caravan storage in south east section of site.

Client Date Mar 2014 SITE WALKOVER A4 Scale nts Taylor Wimpey UK PHOTOGRAPHS Drawn KS Limited Checked GLENMORE FARM, Figure Caversham Bridge House, Waterman Place, Reading, RG1 8DN WESTBURY 3A Tel 0118 950 0761 Fax 0118 959 7498 j:\29776 swanpool, falmouth\3501_geo desk study\04 cad & graphics\report figs\fig 3a.doc

Photo 3: Looking out onto site’s north east perimeter

Photo 4: Looking out to site’s south west perimeter

Client Date Mar 2014 SITE WALKOVER A4 Scale nts PHOTOGRAPHS Drawn KS Taylor Wimpey UK Checked Limited GLENMORE FARM, Figure Caversham Bridge House, Waterman Place, Reading, RG1 8DN WESTBURY 3B Tel 0118 950 0761 Fax 0118 959 7498 j:\29776 swanpool, falmouth\3501_geo desk study\04 cad & graphics\report figs\fig 3a.doc

Photo 5: Looking out onto site’s north west perimeter

Photo 6: Looking out to site’s north west perimeter

Client Date Mar 2014 SITE WALKOVER A4 Scale nts PHOTOGRAPHS Drawn KS Taylor Wimpey UK Checked Limited GLENMORE FARM, Figure Caversham Bridge House, Waterman Place, Reading, RG1 8DN WESTBURY 3C Tel 0118 950 0761 Fax 0118 959 7498 j:\29776 swanpool, falmouth\3501_geo desk study\04 cad & graphics\report figs\fig 3a.doc

Photo 7: Looking out onto site’s south east perimeter showing depression in ground

Photo 8: Looking out to site’s southern corner showing depression in ground

Client Date Mar 2014 SITE WALKOVER A4 Scale nts Taylor Wimpey UK PHOTOGRAPHS Drawn KS Limited Checked GLENMORE FARM, Figure Caversham Bridge House, Waterman Place, Reading, RG1 8DN WESTBURY 3D Tel 0118 950 0761 Fax 0118 959 7498 j:\29776 swanpool, falmouth\3501_geo desk study\04 cad & graphics\report figs\fig 3a.doc

Photo 9: Looking out onto site’s south west perimeter

Photo 10: Stable and buildings used for storage on site.

Client Date Mar 2014 SITE WALKOVER A4 Scale nts Taylor Wimpey UK PHOTOGRAPHS Drawn KS Limited Checked GLENMORE FARM, Figure Caversham Bridge House, Waterman Place, Reading, RG1 8DN WESTBURY 3E Tel 0118 950 0761 Fax 0118 959 7498 j:\29776 swanpool, falmouth\3501_geo desk study\04 cad & graphics\report figs\fig 3a.doc Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

Appendix A Specification for Phase 1 Ground Conditions Assessment

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Specification for Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) The report will present the factual data together with a 1 Introduction preliminary CSM and a qualitative Tier 1 assessment The objective of a Phase 1 desk study is to identify the based on a source-pathway-receptor model to identify likely ground conditions and environmental setting of a potential pollutant linkages. defined site and assess the information to identify potential issues which might have associated The report will include conclusions based on the potential environmental liabilities or affect the site redevelopment. for contamination to be present and an assessment of environmental liabilities and potential constraints to The Phase 1 assessment will comprise (a) a desk based redevelopment. collection of information (b) a site and area reconnaissance and (c) factual and interpretative 3 Clarifications and Limitations reporting including a Tier 1 Qualitative Risk Assessment  Some of the searches may be undertaken using and preparation of a preliminary Conceptual Site Model computerised database facilities. All databases (CSM). The identification of current and historic land use have the limitation that they may not be up to date activities on and immediately off site is used to assess because they are only periodically updated. the likelihood for ground contamination to be present.  No guarantee can be given for the accuracy or A Phase 1 Desk Study and site reconnaissance is the completeness of third party information. minimum requirement under the National Planning Policy  Based on a review of the initial data the collection of Framework (NPPF) Clause 121 and the definition of “Site further information, e.g. via formal requests to the Investigation Information” given in the Glossary Page 56, relevant authorities, may be recommended. Any to support any planning application on a site that might charges associated with additional data collection be affected by contamination. will be notified with a request for written authorisation to proceed. The NPPF also requires a desk study if the site is  The absence of records retrieved from the PBA potentially affected by ground instability and the overlap natural and mining cavities (non-coal) databases in data gathering and other requirements means it is should not be considered as conclusive as to the usually very cost effective to carry out a combined absence of cavities. Whilst all reasonable efforts are contamination ground condition assessment and made to check that the information contained in the geotechnical desk study. cavity databases is accurate we do not warranty that 2 Scope of Works the data is complete or error free. The following sources of information will be included in  Information presented on maps / photographs our standard Phase 1 data search: represents the situation as surveyed at a given time. It is possible for developments to have occurred . Commissioning of a third party to provide Historical between surveys that are not shown or for the map and current Ordnance Survey maps. record to have been censored for military security. . Review of readily available published geological  It should be noted that the Tier 1 risk assessment maps and memoirs may determine that the identification of potential . Purchase of BGS Borehole Records (if ecological receptors is inconclusive and recommend appropriate/available) a Phase 1 habitat survey is subsequently . Commissioning of a third party to search databases undertaken. holding environmental information in the public  The comments and the opinions expressed will be domain. based on the information obtained from the specified . Review of PBA’s national natural and mining sources. However, there may be conditions cavities (non-coal) databases. pertaining to the site, which are not disclosed by this . Review of PBA’s internal database of ground information and, therefore, can not be taken into investigation reports and surveys. consideration. . Review of current guidance on the potential for  The interpretation is be carried out based on a radon to be present scientific and engineering appraisal and does not . Review of published maps on hydrogeology and take into account the perceptions of, for example groundwater vulnerability banks, insurers, lay people etc. . Telephone requests to the council for information  When data is insufficient or inadequate to support a that can be provided without charge robust assessment we will state that any conclusions . An internet search (using Google or a similar search are provisional and recommend further works. engine)  It should be noted that NPPF requires that “planning . Web based information on ecological sites with decisions should also ensure that adequate site international and national designations using a investigation information, prepared by a competent search radius of 1, 2 or 5km depending on the site person, is presented” specific circumstances. . A desk study may not be sufficient to enable the authority to grant planning The site and surrounding area will be visited for visual permission. evidence of potentially contaminative features and  An intrusive ground investigation may be required to activities such as oil tanks and chemical storage drums. confirm the actual site conditions and risks. The scope of the reconnaissance will be agreed with the It should be noted that the Phase 1 is a land condition Client but ideally should include internal walk through of assessment and does not purport to be an ecological, all buildings and interviews with knowledgeable site flood risk or archaeological survey and additional personnel. specific surveys may be required to support a planning application.

J:\30071 Aylestone Hill, Hereford\3501 - Geo Phase 1 Desk Study\03 Reports\App A - Spec\Geoenv DS Spec R9 April 12.doc Page 1 of 1 Revision Issued July 2011 Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

Appendix B Historical Ordnance Survey Maps

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Site Details:

Glenmore Farm

Client Ref: EMS_239947_320583 Report Ref: EMS-239947_320583 Grid Ref: 386361, 152826

Map Name: MasterMap

Map date: 2012

Scale: 1:1,250

Printed at: 1:2,500

Produced by GroundSure Environmental Insight www.groundsure.com

Supplied by: www.emapsite.com [email protected]

© Crown copyright and database rights 2013 Ordnance Survey 100035207

Production date: 03 March 2014

To view map legend click here Legend

Site Details:

Glenmore Farm

Client Ref: EMS_239947_320583 Report Ref: EMS-239947_320583 Grid Ref: 386361, 152826

Map Name: National Grid

Map date: 1995

Scale: 1:2,500

Printed at: 1:2,500

Produced by GroundSure Environmental Insight www.groundsure.com

Supplied by: www.emapsite.com [email protected]

© Crown copyright and database rights 2013 Ordnance Survey 100035207

Production date: 03 March 2014

To view map legend click here Legend

Site Details:

Glenmore Farm

Client Ref: EMS_239947_320583 Report Ref: EMS-239947_320583 Grid Ref: 386361, 152826

Map Name: National Grid

Map date: 1988

Scale: 1:2,500

Printed at: 1:2,500

Produced by GroundSure Environmental Insight www.groundsure.com

Supplied by: www.emapsite.com [email protected]

© Crown copyright and database rights 2013 Ordnance Survey 100035207

Production date: 03 March 2014

To view map legend click here Legend

Site Details:

Glenmore Farm

Client Ref: EMS_239947_320583 Report Ref: EMS-239947_320583 Grid Ref: 386361, 152826

Map Name: National Grid

Map date: 1988

Scale: 1:2,500

Printed at: 1:2,500

Produced by GroundSure Environmental Insight www.groundsure.com

Supplied by: www.emapsite.com [email protected]

© Crown copyright and database rights 2013 Ordnance Survey 100035207

Production date: 03 March 2014

To view map legend click here Legend

Site Details:

Glenmore Farm

Client Ref: EMS_239947_320583 Report Ref: EMS-239947_320583 Grid Ref: 386361, 152826

Map Name: National Grid

Map date: 1970-1971

Scale: 1:2,500

Printed at: 1:2,500

Produced by GroundSure Environmental Insight www.groundsure.com

Supplied by: www.emapsite.com [email protected]

© Crown copyright and database rights 2013 Ordnance Survey 100035207

Production date: 03 March 2014

To view map legend click here Legend

Site Details:

Glenmore Farm

Client Ref: EMS_239947_320583 Report Ref: EMS-239947_320583 Grid Ref: 386361, 152826

Map Name: National Grid

Map date: 1969-1970

Scale: 1:2,500

Printed at: 1:2,500

Produced by GroundSure Environmental Insight www.groundsure.com

Supplied by: www.emapsite.com [email protected]

© Crown copyright and database rights 2013 Ordnance Survey 100035207

Production date: 03 March 2014

To view map legend click here Legend

Site Details:

Glenmore Farm

Client Ref: EMS_239947_320583 Report Ref: EMS-239947_320583 Grid Ref: 386361, 152826

Map Name: County Series

Map date: 1941

Scale: 1:2,500

Printed at: 1:2,500

Produced by GroundSure Environmental Insight www.groundsure.com

Supplied by: www.emapsite.com [email protected]

© Crown copyright and database rights 2013 Ordnance Survey 100035207

Production date: 03 March 2014

To view map legend click here Legend

Site Details:

Glenmore Farm

Client Ref: EMS_239947_320583 Report Ref: EMS-239947_320583 Grid Ref: 386361, 152826

Map Name: County Series

Map date: 1924

Scale: 1:2,500

Printed at: 1:2,500

Produced by GroundSure Environmental Insight www.groundsure.com

Supplied by: www.emapsite.com [email protected]

© Crown copyright and database rights 2013 Ordnance Survey 100035207

Production date: 03 March 2014

To view map legend click here Legend

Site Details:

Glenmore Farm

Client Ref: EMS_239947_320583 Report Ref: EMS-239947_320583 Grid Ref: 386361, 152826

Map Name: County Series

Map date: 1901

Scale: 1:2,500

Printed at: 1:2,500

Produced by GroundSure Environmental Insight www.groundsure.com

Supplied by: www.emapsite.com [email protected]

© Crown copyright and database rights 2013 Ordnance Survey 100035207

Production date: 03 March 2014

To view map legend click here Legend

Site Details:

Glenmore Farm

Client Ref: EMS_239947_320583 Report Ref: EMS-239947_320583 Grid Ref: 386361, 152826

Map Name: County Series

Map date: 1887

Scale: 1:2,500

Printed at: 1:2,500

Produced by GroundSure Environmental Insight www.groundsure.com

Supplied by: www.emapsite.com [email protected]

© Crown copyright and database rights 2013 Ordnance Survey 100035207

Production date: 03 March 2014

To view map legend click here Legend

Site Details:

Glenmore Farm

Client Ref: EMS_239947_320583 Report Ref: EMS-239947_320583 Grid Ref: 386361, 152826

Map Name: National Grid

Map date: 2012

Scale: 1:10,000

Printed at: 1:10,000

Produced by GroundSure Environmental Insight www.groundsure.com

Supplied by: www.emapsite.com [email protected]

© Crown copyright and database rights 2013 Ordnance Survey 100035207

Production date: 03 March 2014

To view map legend click here Legend

Site Details:

Glenmore Farm

Client Ref: EMS_239947_320583 Report Ref: EMS-239947_320583 Grid Ref: 386361, 152826

Map Name: 1:10,000 Raster

Map date: 2002

Scale: 1:10,000

Printed at: 1:10,000

Produced by GroundSure Environmental Insight www.groundsure.com

Supplied by: www.emapsite.com [email protected]

© Crown copyright and database rights 2013 Ordnance Survey 100035207

Production date: 03 March 2014

To view map legend click here Legend

Site Details:

Glenmore Farm

Client Ref: EMS_239947_320583 Report Ref: EMS-239947_320583 Grid Ref: 386361, 152826

Map Name: National Grid

Map date: 1987

Scale: 1:10,000

Printed at: 1:10,000

Produced by GroundSure Environmental Insight www.groundsure.com

Supplied by: www.emapsite.com [email protected]

© Crown copyright and database rights 2013 Ordnance Survey 100035207

Production date: 03 March 2014

To view map legend click here Legend

Site Details:

Glenmore Farm

Client Ref: EMS_239947_320583 Report Ref: EMS-239947_320583 Grid Ref: 386361, 152826

Map Name: National Grid

Map date: 1972

Scale: 1:10,000

Printed at: 1:10,000

Produced by GroundSure Environmental Insight www.groundsure.com

Supplied by: www.emapsite.com [email protected]

© Crown copyright and database rights 2013 Ordnance Survey 100035207

Production date: 03 March 2014

To view map legend click here Legend

Site Details:

Glenmore Farm

Client Ref: EMS_239947_320583 Report Ref: EMS-239947_320583 Grid Ref: 386361, 152826

Map Name: Provisional

Map date: 1956

Scale: 1:10,560

Printed at: 1:10,560

Produced by GroundSure Environmental Insight www.groundsure.com

Supplied by: www.emapsite.com [email protected]

© Crown copyright and database rights 2013 Ordnance Survey 100035207

Production date: 03 March 2014

To view map legend click here Legend

Site Details:

Glenmore Farm

Client Ref: EMS_239947_320583 Report Ref: EMS-239947_320583 Grid Ref: 386361, 152826

Map Name: County Series

Map date: 1939-1941

Scale: 1:10,560

Printed at: 1:10,560

Produced by GroundSure Environmental Insight www.groundsure.com

Supplied by: www.emapsite.com [email protected]

© Crown copyright and database rights 2013 Ordnance Survey 100035207

Production date: 03 March 2014

To view map legend click here Legend

Site Details:

Glenmore Farm

Client Ref: EMS_239947_320583 Report Ref: EMS-239947_320583 Grid Ref: 386361, 152826

Map Name: County Series

Map date: 1922

Scale: 1:10,560

Printed at: 1:10,560

Produced by GroundSure Environmental Insight www.groundsure.com

Supplied by: www.emapsite.com [email protected]

© Crown copyright and database rights 2013 Ordnance Survey 100035207

Production date: 03 March 2014

To view map legend click here Legend

Site Details:

Glenmore Farm

Client Ref: EMS_239947_320583 Report Ref: EMS-239947_320583 Grid Ref: 386361, 152826

Map Name: County Series

Map date: 1904

Scale: 1:10,560

Printed at: 1:10,560

Produced by GroundSure Environmental Insight www.groundsure.com

Supplied by: www.emapsite.com [email protected]

© Crown copyright and database rights 2013 Ordnance Survey 100035207

Production date: 03 March 2014

To view map legend click here Legend

Site Details:

Glenmore Farm

Client Ref: EMS_239947_320583 Report Ref: EMS-239947_320583 Grid Ref: 386361, 152826

Map Name: County Series

Map date: 1899-1900

Scale: 1:10,560

Printed at: 1:10,560

Produced by GroundSure Environmental Insight www.groundsure.com

Supplied by: www.emapsite.com [email protected]

© Crown copyright and database rights 2013 Ordnance Survey 100035207

Production date: 03 March 2014

To view map legend click here Legend

Site Details:

Glenmore Farm

Client Ref: EMS_239947_320583 Report Ref: EMS-239947_320583 Grid Ref: 386361, 152826

Map Name: County Series

Map date: 1886

Scale: 1:10,560

Printed at: 1:10,560

Produced by GroundSure Environmental Insight www.groundsure.com

Supplied by: www.emapsite.com [email protected]

© Crown copyright and database rights 2013 Ordnance Survey 100035207

Production date: 03 March 2014

To view map legend click here Legend

County Series 1:10,560 scale National Grid 1:10,000 scale

Historical Map Pack Legend

County Series & National Grid

1:10,560 scale & 1:10,000 scale

Information present on these legends is sourced from the same Ordnance Survey mapping as the maps used in this product.

If you have a query regarding any of the maps provided please contact GroundSure’s technical helpline. We will endeavour to answer any queries you may have.

Technical Helpline

Tel:01273 819 700 [email protected] www.groundsure.com

County Series 1:2,500 scale National Grid 1:2,500 / 1:1,250 scale Historical Map Pack Legend

County Series

1:1,250 scale ~ County Series & National Grid

1:2,500 scale

Information present on these legends is sourced from the same Ordnance Survey mapping as the maps used in this product.

If you have a query regarding any of the maps provided within this map pack, please contact GroundSure’s technical helpline. We will endeavour to answer any queries you may have.

Technical Helpline:

Tel:01273 819 700 [email protected] www.groundsure.com

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

Appendix C Envirolnsight and Geolnsight Reports

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

EmapSite Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584

Masdar House, Eversley, RG27 0RP Your Reference: EMS_239947_320584

Report Date 3 Mar 2014

Report Delivery Email - pdf Method:

GroundSure Geoinsight

Address: Glenmore Farm,

Dear Sir/ Madam,

Thank you for placing your order with GroundSure. Please find enclosed the GroundSure GeoInsight as requested.

If you would like further assistance regarding this report then please contact the emapsite customer services team on 0118 9736883 quoting the above report reference number.

Yours faithfully,

emapsite customer services team

Enc. GroundSure GeoInsight GroundSure GeoInsight

Address: Glenmore Farm,

Date: 3 Mar 2014

Reference: EMS-239947_320584

Client: EmapSite

NW N NE

W E

SW S SE Aerial Photograph Capture date: 17-Aug-2005 Grid Reference: 386361,152826 Site Size: 9.80ha Contents Page Contents Page ...... 3 Overview of Findings...... 4 1 Geology...... 6 1.1 Artificial Ground Map...... 6 1.1 Artificial Ground...... 7 1.1.1Artificial/ Made Ground...... 7 1.1.2 Permeability of Artificial Ground...... 7 1.2 Superficial Deposits and Landslips Map...... 8 1.2 Superficial Deposits and Landslips...... 9 1.2.1 Superficial Deposits/ Drift Geology...... 9 1.2.2 Permeability of Superficial Ground...... 9 1.2.3 Landslip...... 9 1.2.4 Landslip Permeability...... 9 1.3 Bedrock and Faults Map...... 10 1.3 Bedrock, Solid Geology & Faults...... 11 1.3.1 Bedrock/ Solid Geology...... 11 1.3.2 Permeability of Bedrock Ground...... 11 1.3.3 Faults...... 11 1.4 Radon Data...... 12 1.4.1 Radon Affected Areas...... 12 1.4.2 Radon Protection...... 12 2 Ground Workings Map...... 13 2 Ground Workings...... 14 2.1 Historical Surface Ground Working Features derived from Historical Mapping...... 14 2.2 Historical Underground Working Features derived from Historical Mapping...... 16 2.3 Current Ground Workings...... 16 3 Mining, Extraction & Natural Cavities Map...... 18 3 Mining, Extraction & Natural Cavities...... 19 3.1 Historical Mining...... 19 3.2 Coal Mining...... 19 3.3 Johnson Poole and Bloomer...... 19 3.4 Non-Coal Mining...... 19 3.5 Non-Coal Mining Cavities...... 20 3.6 Natural Cavities...... 20 3.7 Brine Extraction...... 20 3.8 Gypsum Extraction...... 20 3.9 Tin Mining...... 20 3.10 Clay Mining...... 21 4 Natural Ground Subsidence...... 22 4.1 Shrink-Swell Clay Map...... 22 4.2 Landslides Map...... 23 4.3 Ground Dissolution Soluble Rocks Map...... 24 4.4 Compressible Deposits Map...... 25 4.5 Collapsible Deposits Map...... 26 4.6 Running Sand Map...... 27 4 Natural Ground Subsidence...... 28 4.1 Shrink-Swell Clays...... 28 4.2 Landslides...... 28 4.3 Ground Dissolution of Soluble Rocks...... 29 4.4 Compressible Deposits...... 29 4.5 Collapsible Deposits...... 29 4.6 Running Sands...... 29 5 Borehole Records Map...... 30 5 Borehole Records...... 31 6 Estimated Background Soil Chemistry...... 32

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 3 Overview of Findings The GroundSure GeoInsight provides high quality geo-environmental information that allows geo- environmental professionals and their clients to make informed decisions and be forewarned of potential ground instability problems that may affect the ground investigation, foundation design and possibly remediation options that could lead to possible additional costs. The report is based on the BGS 1:50,000 Digital Geological Map of Great Britain, BGS Geosure data; BRITPITS database; Shallow Mining data and Borehole Records, Coal Authority data including brine extraction areas, PBA non-coal mining and natural cavities database, Johnson Poole and Bloomer mining data and GroundSure's unique database including historical surface ground and underground workings. For further details on each dataset, please refer to each individual section in the report as listed. Where the database has been searched a numerical result will be recorded. Where the database has not been searched '-' will be recorded.

Section 1:Geology

1.1 Artificial Ground 1.1.1 Is there any Artificial Ground/ Made Ground present beneath No the study site?

1.1.2 Are there any records relating to permeability of artificial No ground within the study site* boundary?

1.2 Superficial 1.2.1 Is there any Superficial Ground/Drift Geology present No Geology and Landslips beneath the study site?

1.2.2 Are there any records relating to permeability of superficial No geology within the study site boundary?

1.2.3 Are there any records of landslip within 500m of the study No site boundary?

1.2.4 Are there any records relating to permeability of landslips No within the study site boundary?

1.3 Bedrock, Solid 1.3.1 For records of Bedrock and Solid Geology beneath the study Geology & Faults site* see the detailed findings section.

1.3.2 Are there any records relating to permeability of bedrock Yes within the study site boundary?

1.3.3 Are there any records of faults within 500m of the study site Yes boundary?

1.4 Radon data 1.4.1 Is the property in a Radon Affected Area as defined by the The property is not in a Radon Affected Health Protection Agency (HPA) and if so what percentage of Area, as less than 1% of properties are homes are above the Action Level? above the Action Level

1.4.2 Is the property in an area where Radon Protection Measures are required for new properties or extensions to existing ones as No radon protective measures are described in publication BR211 by the Building Research necessary Establishment?

Section 2:Ground Workings On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000

2.1 Historical Surface Ground Working Features from Small Scale 0 5 55 Not Searched Not Searched Mapping

2.2 Historical Underground Workings from Small Scale Mapping 0 0 0 0 0

2.3 Current Ground Workings 0 0 0 8 3

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 EMS_239947_320584 4 Section 3:Mining, Extraction & Natural Cavities On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000

3.1 Historical Mining 0 0 0 0 0

3.2 Coal Mining 0 0 0 0 0

3.3 Johnson Poole and Bloomer Mining Area 0 0 0 0 0

3.4 Non-Coal Mining 0 0 0 0 0

3.5 Non-Coal Mining Cavities 0 0 0 0 0

3.6 Natural Cavities 0 0 0 0 0

3.7 Brine Extraction 0 0 0 0 0

3.8 Gypsum Extraction 0 0 0 0 0

3.9 Tin Mining 0 0 0 0 0

3.10 Clay Mining 0 0 0 0 0

Section 4:Natural Ground Subsidence On-site

4.1 Shrink Swell Clay Moderate

4.2 Landslides Very Low

4.3 Ground Dissolution of Soluble Rocks Null

4.4 Compressible Deposits Negligible

4.5 Collapsible Deposits Very Low

4.6 Running Sand Negligible

Section 5:Borehole Records On-site 0-50m 51-250

0 0 0 5 BGS Recorded Boreholes

Section 6:Estimated Background Soil Chemistry On-site 0-50m 51-250

4 1 6 6 Records of Background Soil Chemistry

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 EMS_239947_320584 5 1 Geology 1.1 Artificial Ground Map

NW N NE

W E

S SW SE

Artificial Ground Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 6 1 Geology 1.1 Artificial Ground 1.1.1Artificial/ Made Ground

The following geological information represented on the mapping is derived from 1:50,000 scale BGS Geological mapping, Sheet No:281

Are there any records of Artificial/Made Ground within 500m of the study site boundary? Yes

Distance ID Direction LEX Code Description Rock Description (m) 1 94.0 SE MGR-MGRD MADE GROUND (UNDIVIDED) ARTIFICIAL DEPOSIT

2 439.0 SE MGR-MGRD MADE GROUND (UNDIVIDED) ARTIFICIAL DEPOSIT

1.1.2 Permeability of Artificial Ground

Are there any records relating to permeability of artificial ground within the study site boundary? No

Database searched and no data found.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 7 1.2 Superficial Deposits and Landslips Map NW N NE

W E

S SW SE

Superficial Deposits and Landslips © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Legend Ordnance Survey license 100035207.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 8 1.2 Superficial Deposits and Landslips 1.2.1 Superficial Deposits/ Drift Geology

Are there any records of Superficial Deposits/ Drift Geology within 500m of the study site boundary? Yes

Distance ID Direction LEX Code Description Rock Description (m) CLAY, SILT, SAND AND 1 75.0 NE ALV-CSSG ALLUVIUM GRAVEL CLAY, SILT, SAND AND 2 346.0 W HEAD-CSSG HEAD GRAVEL

1.2.2 Permeability of Superficial Ground

Are there any records relating to permeability of superficial ground within the study site boundary? No

Database searched and no data found.

1.2.3 Landslip

Are there any records of Landslip within 500m of the study site boundary? No

Database searched and no data found. This Geology shows the main components as discrete layers, these are: Artificial / Made Ground, Superficial / Drift Geology and Landslips. These are all displayed with the BGS Lexicon code for the rock unit and BGS sheet number. Not all of the main geological components have nationwide coverage.

1.2.4 Landslip Permeability

Are there any records relating to permeability of landslips within the study site** boundary? No

Database searched and no data found.

* This includes an automatically generated 50m buffer zone around the site

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 9 1.3 Bedrock and Faults Map NW N NE

W E

S SW SE

Bedrock and Faults Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 10 1.3 Bedrock, Solid Geology & Faults The following geological information represented on the mapping is derived from 1:50,000 scale BGS Geological mapping, Sheet No:281 1.3.1 Bedrock/ Solid Geology

Records of Bedrock/ Solid Geology within 500m of the study site boundary:

ID Distance (m) Direction LEX Code Description Rock Age 1 0.0 On Site OXC-MDST Oxford Clay Formation - Mudstone Oxfordian / Callovian 2 0.0 On Site TOF-LMST Todber Freestone Member - Limestone Oxfordian 3 0.0 On Site HYB-SDST Hazelbury Bryan Formation - Sandstone Oxfordian 4 21.0 E HYB-SDST Hazelbury Bryan Formation - Sandstone Oxfordian 5 94.0 SE WI-IRST Westbury Ironstone Member - Ironstone Oxfordian 6 163.0 SW WI-IRST Westbury Ironstone Member - Ironstone Oxfordian 7 204.0 SE KC-MDST Kimmeridge Clay Formation - Mudstone Kimmeridgian 8 439.0 SE WI-IRST Westbury Ironstone Member - Ironstone Oxfordian 9 465.0 SW HYB-SDST Hazelbury Bryan Formation - Sandstone Oxfordian

1.3.2 Permeability of Bedrock Ground

Are there any records relating to permeability of bedrock ground within the study site* boundary? Yes

Distance (m) Direction Flow Type Maximum Permeability Minimum Permeability 0.0 On Site Fracture Low Very Low 0.0 On Site Fracture High High 0.0 On Site Mixed High High 21.0 E Mixed High High

1.3.3 Faults

Are there any records of Faults within 500m of the study site boundary? Yes

ID Distance (m) Direction Category Description Feature Description 12 0.0 On Site FAULT Normal fault, inferred

The geology map for the site and surrounding area are extracted from the BGS Digital Geological Map of Great Britain at 1:50,000 scale.

This Geology shows the main components as discrete layers, these are: Bedrock/ Solid Geology and linear features such as Faults. These are all displayed with the BGS Lexicon code for the rock unit and BGS sheet number. Not all of the main geological components have nationwide coverage.

* This includes an automatically generated 50m buffer zone around the site

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 11 1.4 Radon Data 1.4.1 Radon Affected Areas

Is the property in a Radon Affected Area as defined by the Health Protection Agency (HPA) and if so what percentage of homes are above the Action Level? The property is not in a Radon Affected Area, as less than 1% of properties are above the Action Level

1.4.2 Radon Protection

Is the property in an area where Radon Protection are required for new properties or extensions to existing ones as described in publication BR211 by the Building Research Establishment? No radon protective measures are necessary

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 12 2 Ground Workings Map NW N NE

W E

S SW SE

Ground Workings Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 13 2 Ground Workings

2.1 Historical Surface Ground Working Features derived from Historical Mapping

This dataset is based on GroundSure's unique Historical Land Use Database derived from 1:10,560 and 1:10,000 scale historical mapping.

Are there any Historical Surface Ground Working Features within 250m of the study site boundary? Yes

The following Historical Surface Ground Working Features are provided by GroundSure:

ID Distance (m) Direction NGR Use Date 386452 1A 19.0 NE Cuttings 1956 153050 386456 2A 39.0 NE Cuttings 1987 153062 386456 3A 39.0 NE Cuttings 1972 153062 386605 4B 48.0 SE Cuttings 1987 152713 386605 5B 48.0 SE Cuttings 1972 152713 386605 6B 51.0 SE Cuttings 1956 152712 386615 7B 53.0 SE Cuttings 1886 152710 386615 8B 53.0 SE Cuttings 1886 152710 386630 9B 54.0 SE Cuttings 1904 152798 386635 10B 58.0 SE Cuttings 1900 152807 386635 11B 58.0 SE Cuttings 1922 152807 386635 12B 58.0 SE Cuttings 1938 152807 386452 13C 69.0 SE Cuttings 1886 152399 386452 14C 69.0 SE Cuttings 1886 152399 386538 15D 70.0 SE Cuttings 1956 152561 386543 16D 74.0 SE Cuttings 1900 152564 386543 17D 74.0 SE Cuttings 1938 152564 386543 18D 74.0 SE Cuttings 1922 152564 386474 19 83.0 SE Ponds 1956 152465 386496 20 88.0 SE Pond 1938 152496 386333 21J 106.0 SE Unspecified Quarry 1904 152323

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 14 ID Distance (m) Direction NGR Use Date 386304 22I 108.0 SE Unspecified Quarry 1900 152300 386465 23C 122.0 SE Pond 1938 152428 386436 24C 122.0 S Pond 1972 152417 386696 25E 127.0 NE Cuttings 1886 152957 386696 26E 127.0 NE Cuttings 1886 152957 386598 27L 129.0 SE Unspecified Quarry 1900 152563 386700 28E 143.0 NE Cuttings 1904 152957 386707 29E 147.0 NE Cuttings 1900 152955 386707 30E 147.0 NE Cuttings 1938 152955 386707 31E 147.0 NE Cuttings 1922 152955 386694 32E 148.0 NE Cuttings 1956 152937 386697 33E 157.0 NE Cuttings 1987 152952 386697 34E 157.0 NE Cuttings 1972 152952 386611 35F 163.0 SE Unspecified Pit 1904 152507 386614 36F 164.0 SE Unspecified Pit 1900 152505 386608 37F 169.0 SE Unspecified Pit 1956 152493 386777 38G 171.0 SE Unspecified Pit 1886 152611 386777 39G 171.0 SE Unspecified Pit 1886 152611 386626 40K 174.0 SE Unspecified Pits 1938 152445 386640 41 178.0 SE Unspecified Quarry 1904 152524 386533 42H 179.0 SE Cuttings 1922 152402 386542 43H 186.0 SE Unspecified Heap 1938 152404 386592 44 211.0 SE Unspecified Pit 1922 152415 386316 45I 212.0 S Pond 1922 152285 386316 46I 212.0 S Pond 1938 152285 386330 47J 213.0 S Pond 1972 152289 386279 48I 214.0 S Pond 1956 152276 386604 49K 216.0 SE Cuttings 1904 152431 386353 50 216.0 S Pond 1987 152301 386485 51 222.0 S Unspecified Pit 1938 152316

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 15 ID Distance (m) Direction NGR Use Date 386459 52 231.0 S Cuttings 1922 152280 386780 53L 232.0 SE Pond 1938 152555 386780 54M 232.0 SE Pond 1922 152555 386702 55N 238.0 SE Pond 1904 152418 386796 56M 241.0 SE Unspecified Quarry 1904 152562 386821 57M 242.0 SE Pond 1956 152562 386704 58N 242.0 SE Unspecified Pit 1900 152411 386097 59O 250.0 SW Filter Bed 1972 152530 386097 60O 250.0 SW Filter Bed 1987 152530

2.2 Historical Underground Working Features derived from Historical Mapping

This data is derived from the GroundSure unique Historical Land Use Database. It contains data derived from 1:10,000 and 1:10,560 historical Ordnance Survey Mapping and includes some natural topographical features (Shake Holes for example) as well as manmade features that may have implications for ground stability. Underground and mining features have been identified from surface features such as shafts. The distance that these extend underground is not shown.

Are there any Historical Underground Working Features within 1000m of the study site boundary? No

Database searched and no data found.

2.3 Current Ground Workings

This dataset is derived from the BGS BRITPITS database covering active; inactive mines; quarries; oil wells; gas wells and mineral wharves; and rail deposits throughout the British Isles.

Are there any BGS Current Ground Workings within 1000m of the study site boundary? Yes

The following Current Ground Workings information is provided by British Geological Survey:

Distance Commodity ID Direction NGR Pit Name Type of working Status (m) Produced A surface mineral working. It may be 386540 61 252.0 SE Ironstone Westbury Junction Pit termed Quarry, Sand Pit, Clay Pit or Ceased 152340 Opencast Coal Site A surface mineral working. It may be Not 386300 302.0 S Limestone Ham Pit termed Quarry, Sand Pit, Clay Pit or Ceased shown 152280 Opencast Coal Site A surface mineral working. It may be 386815 63 309.0 SE Ironstone Hawkridge Road Pit termed Quarry, Sand Pit, Clay Pit or Ceased 152590 Opencast Coal Site A surface mineral working. It may be 386850 64 312.0 E Limestone Church Path Pit termed Quarry, Sand Pit, Clay Pit or Ceased 152775 Opencast Coal Site

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 16 Distance Commodity ID Direction NGR Pit Name Type of working Status (m) Produced A surface mineral working. It may be 386930 65 391.0 E Ironstone Hawkridge Road Pit termed Quarry, Sand Pit, Clay Pit or Ceased 152715 Opencast Coal Site A surface mineral working. It may be Not 386625 482.0 SE Ironstone Frogmore Pit termed Quarry, Sand Pit, Clay Pit or Ceased shown 152125 Opencast Coal Site A surface mineral working. It may be 387025 67 492.0 E Ironstone Heywood Pit South termed Quarry, Sand Pit, Clay Pit or Ceased 152830 Opencast Coal Site A surface mineral working. It may be 386990 68 498.0 NE Ironstone Heywood Pit North termed Quarry, Sand Pit, Clay Pit or Ceased 152970 Opencast Coal Site A surface mineral working. It may be Not 386120 610.0 SW Mineral Westbury Iron Works termed Quarry, Sand Pit, Clay Pit or Ceased shown 152025 Opencast Coal Site A surface mineral working. It may be Not 386345 732.0 S Ironstone Western Hole termed Quarry, Sand Pit, Clay Pit or Ceased shown 151830 Opencast Coal Site A surface mineral working. It may be Not 387265 784.0 E Ironstone Blenches Mill Farm Pit termed Quarry, Sand Pit, Clay Pit or Ceased shown 153055 Opencast Coal Site

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 17 3 Mining, Extraction & Natural Cavities Map

NW N NE

W E

SW S SE Mining, Extraction and © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Natural Cavities Legend Ordnance Survey license 100035207.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 18 3 Mining, Extraction & Natural Cavities 3.1 Historical Mining

This dataset is derived from GroundSure unique Historical Land-use Database that are indicative of mining or extraction activities.

Are there any Historical Mining areas within 1000m of the study site boundary? No

Database searched and no data found.

3.2 Coal Mining

This dataset provides information as to whether the study site lies within a known coal mining affected area as defined by the coal authority.

Are there any Coal Mining areas within 1000m of the study site boundary? No

Database searched and no data found.

3.3 Johnson Poole and Bloomer

This dataset provides information as to whether the study site lies within an area where JPB hold information relating to mining.

Are there any JPB Mining areas within 1000m of the study site boundary? No

The following information provided by JPB is not represented on mapping: Database searched and no data found.

3.4 Non-Coal Mining

This dataset provides information as to whether the study site lies within an area which may have been subject to non-coal historic mining.

Are there any Non-Coal Mining areas within 1000m of the study site boundary? No

Database searched and no data found.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 19 3.5 Non-Coal Mining Cavities

This dataset provides information from the Peter Brett Associates (PBA) mining cavities database (compiled for the national study entitled “Review of mining instability in Great Britain, 1990” PBA has also continued adding to this database) on mineral extraction by mining.

Are there any Non-Coal Mining cavities within 1000m of the study site boundary? No

Database searched and no data found.

3.6 Natural Cavities

This dataset provides information based on Peter Brett Associates natural cavities database.

Are there any Natural Cavities within 1000m of the study site boundary? No

Database searched and no data found.

3.7 Brine Extraction

This dataset provides information from the Brine Compensation Board which has been discontinued and is now covered by the Coal Authority.

Are there any Brine Extraction areas within 1000m of the study site boundary? No

Database searched and no data found.

3.8 Gypsum Extraction

This dataset provides information on Gypsum extraction from British Gypsum records.

Are there any Gypsum Extraction areas within 1000m of the study site boundary? No

Database searched and no data found.

3.9 Tin Mining

This dataset provides information on tin mining areas and is derived from tin mining records. This search is based upon postcode information to a sector level.

Are there any Tin Mining areas within 1000m of the study site boundary? No

Database searched and no data found.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 20 3.10 Clay Mining

This dataset provides information on Kaolin and Ball Clay mining from relevant mining records.

Are there any Clay Mining areas within 1000m of the study site boundary? No

Database searched and no data found.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 21 4 Natural Ground Subsidence 4.1 Shrink-Swell Clay Map

NW N NE

W E

SW S SE Shrink Swell Clay Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 22 4.2 Landslides Map NW N NE

W E

SW S SE Landslides Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 23 4.3 Ground Dissolution Soluble Rocks Map NW N NE

W E

SW S SE Ground Dissolution © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Soluble Rocks Legend Ordnance Survey license 100035207.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 24 4.4 Compressible Deposits Map NW N NE

W E

SW S SE Compressible Deposits Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 25 4.5 Collapsible Deposits Map NW N NE

W E

SW S SE Collapsible Deposits Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 26 4.6 Running Sand Map NW N NE

W E

SW S SE Running Sand Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 27 4 Natural Ground Subsidence

The National Ground Subsidence rating is obtained through the 6 natural ground stability hazard datasets, which are supplied by the British Geological Survey (BGS).

The following GeoSure data represented on the mapping is derived from the BGS Digital Geological map of Great Britain at 1:50,000 scale.

What is the maximum hazard rating of natural subsidence within the study site** boundary? Moderate 4.1 Shrink-Swell Clays

The following Shrink Swell information provided by the British Geological Survey:

ID Distance (m) Direction Hazard Rating Details Ground conditions predominantly non-plastic. No special actions required to avoid problems due to shrink-swell clays. No special ground investigation 1 0.0 On Site Negligible required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely likely due to potential problems with shrink-swell clays. Ground conditions predominantly high plasticity. Do not plant or remove trees or shrubs near to buildings without expert advice about their effect and management. For new build, consideration should be given to advice published by the National House Building Council (NHBC) and the 2 0.0 On Site Moderate Building Research Establishment (BRE). There is a probable increase in construction cost to reduce potential shrink-swell problems. For existing property, there is a probable increase in insurance risk during droughts or where vegetation with high moisture demands is present.

4.2 Landslides

The following Landslides information provided by the British Geological Survey:

ID Distance (m) Direction Hazard Rating Details Slope instability problems are unlikely to be present. No special actions required to avoid problems due to landslides. No special ground 1 0.0 On Site Very Low investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with landslides.

* This includes an automatically generated 50m buffer zone around the site

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 28 4.3 Ground Dissolution of Soluble Rocks

The following Compressible Deposits information provided by the British Geological Survey:

Distance (m) Direction Hazard Rating Details Soluble rocks are not present in the search area. No special actions required to avoid problems due to soluble rocks. No special ground investigation required, and 0 On site Null-Negligible increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with soluble rocks.

4.4 Compressible Deposits

The following Compressible Deposits information provided by the British Geological Survey:

Distance ID Direction Hazard Rating Details (m) No indicators for compressible deposits identified. No special actions required to avoid problems due to compressible deposits. No special ground investigation required, and 1 0.0 On Site Negligible increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with compressible deposits.

4.5 Collapsible Deposits

The following Collapsible Rocks information provided by the British Geological Survey:

Distance ID Direction Hazard Rating Details (m) Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are unlikely to be 1 0.0 On Site Very Low present. No special ground investigation required or increased construction costs or increased financial risk due to potential problems with collapsible deposits.

4.6 Running Sands

The following Running Sands information provided by the British Geological Survey:

ID Distance (m) Direction Hazard Rating Details No indicators for running sand identified. No special actions required to avoid problems due to running sand. No special ground investigation 1 0.0 On Site Negligible required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with running sand.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 29 5 Borehole Records Map NW N NE

W E

SW S SE Borehole Records Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 30 5 Borehole Records

The systematic analysis of data extracted from the BGS Borehole Records database provides the following information.

Records of boreholes within 250m of the study site boundary: 0

Database searched and no data found.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 31 6 Estimated Background Soil Chemistry Records of background estimated soil chemistry within 250m of the study site boundary: 11

For further information on how this data is calculated and limitations upon its use, please see the GroundSure GeoInsight User Guide, available on request.

Distance (m) Direction Sample Type Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Nickel (Ni) Lead (Pb) 0.0 On Site Sediment 15 - 25 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg 15 - 30 mg/kg <150 mg/kg 0.0 On Site Sediment 15 - 25 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 90 - 120 mg/kg 15 - 30 mg/kg <150 mg/kg 0.0 On Site Sediment 15 - 25 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg 15 - 30 mg/kg <150 mg/kg 0.0 On Site Sediment 15 - 25 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 90 - 120 mg/kg 15 - 30 mg/kg <150 mg/kg 21.0 E Sediment 15 - 25 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg 15 - 30 mg/kg <150 mg/kg 75.0 NE Sediment 15 - 25 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg 15 - 30 mg/kg <150 mg/kg 94.0 SE Sediment <15 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg 15 - 30 mg/kg <150 mg/kg 162.0 W Sediment 15 - 25 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg 15 - 30 mg/kg <150 mg/kg 162.0 SW Sediment <15 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg 15 - 30 mg/kg <150 mg/kg 196.0 NW Sediment 15 - 25 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 90 - 120 mg/kg 15 - 30 mg/kg <150 mg/kg 204.0 SE Sediment <15 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg 15 - 30 mg/kg <150 mg/kgc

*As this data is based upon underlying 1:50,000 scale geological information, a 50m buffer has been added to the search radius.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 32 Contact Details

EmapSite Telephone: 0118 9736883 [email protected]

British Geological Survey Enquiries Kingsley Dunham Centre Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG Tel: 0115 936 3143. Fax: 0115 936 3276. Email:[email protected] Web:www.bgs.ac.uk BGS Geological Hazards Reports and general geological enquiries British Gypsum British Gypsum Ltd East Leake Loughborough Leicestershire LE12 6HX

The Coal Authority 200 Lichfield Lane Mansfield Notts NG18 4RG Tel: 0845 762 6848 DX 716176 Mansfield 5 www.coal.gov.uk

Public Health England Public information access office Public Health England, Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8UG https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/public-health-england Email: [email protected] Main switchboard: 020 7654 8000

Johnson Poole & Bloomer Limited Harris and Pearson Building, Brettel Lane Brierley Hill, West Midlands DY5 3LH Tel: +44 (0) 1384 262 000 Email:[email protected] Website: www.jpb.co.uk

Ordnance Survey Romsey Road Southampton SO16 4GU Tel: 08456 050505 Website: http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/

Getmapping PLC Virginia Villas, High Street, Hartley Witney, Hampshire RG27 8NW Tel: 01252 845444 Website:http://www1.getmapping.com/

Peter Brett Associates Caversham Bridge House Waterman Place Reading Berkshire RG1 8DN Tel: +44 (0)118 950 0761 E-mail:[email protected] Website:http://www.peterbrett.com/home

Acknowledgements: Ordnance Survey © Crown Copyright and/or Database Right. All Rights Reserved. Licence Number [03421028]. This report has been prepared in accordance with the GroundSure Ltd standard Terms and Conditions of business for work of this nature. Report Reference: EMS-239947_320584 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320584 33 Standard Terms and Conditions shall be binding only when made in writing and signed by GroundSure's authorised representative or when accepted through the Order Website. 1 Definitions 3 The Client’s obligations In these terms and conditions unless the context otherwise requires: 3.1The Client shall comply with the terms of this Contract and “Beneficiary” means the person or entity for whose benefit the Client has (i) procure that the Beneficiary or any third party relying on the obtained the Services. Services complies with and acts as if it is bound by the Contract and “Client” means the party or parties entering into a Contract with GroundSure. (ii) be liable to GroundSure for the acts and omissions of the “Commercial” means any building or property which is not Residential. Beneficiary or any third party relying on the Services as if such acts and omissions “Confidential Information” means the contents of this Contract and all information were those of the Client. received from the Client as a result of, or in connection with, this Contract other 3.2 The Client shall be solely responsible for ensuring that the Services are than appropriate and suitable for its and/or the Beneficiary’s needs. (i) information which the Client can prove was rightfully in its 3.3 The Client shall supply to GroundSure as soon as practicable and without charge possession prior to disclosure by GroundSure and all requisite information (and the Client warrants that such information is accurate, (ii) any information which is in the public domain (other than by complete and appropriate), including without limitation any environmental virtue of a breach of this Contract). information relating to the Site and shall give such assistance as GroundSure shall “Support Services” means Support Services provided by GroundSure including, reasonably require in the provision of the Services including, without limitation, without limitation, interpreting third party and in-house environmental data, access to the Site, facilities and equipment. providing environmental support advice, undertaking environmental audits and 3.4 Where the Client’s approval or decision is required to enable GroundSure to assessments, Site investigation, Site monitoring and related items. carry out work in order to provide the Services, such approval or decision shall be “Contract” means the contract between GroundSure and the Client for the given or procured in reasonable time and so as not to delay or disrupt the provision of the Services, and which shall incorporate these terms and conditions, performance of the Services. the Order, and the relevant User Guide. 3.5 Save as expressly permitted by this Contract the Client shall not, and shall “Third Party Data Provider” means any third party providing Third Party Content procure that the Beneficiary shall not, re-sell, alter, add to, or amend the to GroundSure. GroundSure Materials, or use the GroundSure Materials in a manner for which they “Data Reports” means reports comprising factual data with no accompanying were not intended. The Client may make the GroundSure Materials available to a interpretation. third party who is considering acquiring some or all of, or providing funding in “Fees” has the meaning set out in clause 5.1. relation to, the Site, but such third party cannot rely on the same unless expressly “GroundSure” means GroundSure Limited, a company registered in England and permitted under clause 4. Wales under number 03421028. 3.6 The Client is responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of its user name and “GroundSure Materials” means all materials prepared by GroundSure and provided password if using the Order Website and the Client acknowledges that GroundSure as part of the Services, including but not limited to Third Party Content, Data accepts no liability of any kind for any loss or damage suffered by the Client as a Reports, Mapping, and Risk Screening Reports. consequence of using the Order Website. “Intellectual Property” means any patent, copyright, design rights, trade or service mark, moral rights, data protection rights, know-how or trade mark in each case 4 Reliance whether registered or not and including applications for the same or any other 4.1The Client acknowledges that the Services provided by GroundSure consist of rights of a similar nature anywhere in the world. the presentation and analysis of Third Party Content and other content and that “Mapping” means a map, map data or a combination of historical maps of various information obtained from a Third Party Data Provider cannot be guaranteed or ages, time periods and scales. warranted by GroundSure to be reliable. “Order” means an electronic, written or other order form submitted by the Client 4.2 In respect of Data Reports, Mapping and Risk Screening Reports, the following requesting Services from GroundSure in respect of a specified Site. classes of person and no other are entitled to rely on their contents; “Ordnance Survey” means the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and (i) the Beneficiary, Skills, acting through Ordnance Survey, Adanac Drive, Southampton, SO16 0AS, (ii) the Beneficiary's professional advisers, (iii) any person UK. providing funding to the Beneficiary in relation to the Site (whether directly or as “Order Website” means the online platform through which Orders may be placed part of a lending syndicate), by the Client and accepted by GroundSure. (iv) the first purchaser or first tenant of the Site, and “Report” means a Risk Screening Report or Data Report for Commercial or (v) the professional advisers and lenders of the first purchaser or Residential property. tenant of the Site. “Residential” means any building or property used as or intended to be used as a 4.3 In respect of Support Services, only the Client, Beneficiary and parties expressly single dwelling. named in a Report and no other parties are entitled to rely on its contents. “Risk Screening Report” means a risk screening report comprising factual data with 4.4 Save as set out in clauses 4.2 and 4.3 and unless otherwise expressly agreed in an accompanying interpretation by GroundSure. writing, no other person or entity of any kind is entitled to rely on any Services or “Services” means any Report, Mapping and/or Support Services which GroundSure Report issued or provided by GroundSure. Any party considering such Reports and has agreed to provide by accepting an Order pursuant to clause 2.6. Services does so at their own risk. "Site" means the area of land in respect of which the Client has requested 5 Fees and Disbursements GroundSure to provide the Services. “Third Party Content” means data, database information or other information 5.1GroundSure shall charge and the Client shall pay fees at the rate and frequency which is provided to GroundSure by a Third Party Data Provider. specified in the written proposal, Order Website or Order acknowledgement form, "User Guide" means the user guide, as amended from time to time, available upon plus (in the case of Support Services) all proper disbursements incurred by request from GroundSure and on the website (www.GroundSure.com) and forming GroundSure. The Client shall in addition pay all value added tax or other tax payable part of this Contract. on such fees and disbursements in relation to the provision of the Services (together “Fees”). 2 Scope of Services, terms and conditions, requests for insurance and 5.2 The Client shall pay all outstanding Fees to GroundSure in full without quotations deduction, counterclaim or set off within 30 days of the date of GroundSure’s 2.1 GroundSure agrees to provide the Services in accordance with the Contract. invoice or such other period as may be agreed in writing between GroundSure and 2.2 GroundSure shall exercise reasonable skill and care in the provision of the the Client ("Payment Date"). Interest on late payments will accrue on a daily basis Services. from the Payment Date until the date of payment (whether before or after 2.3 Subject to clause 7.3 the Client acknowledges that it has not relied on any judgment) at the rate of 8% per annum. statement or representation made by or on behalf of GroundSure which is not set 5.3 The Client shall be deemed to have agreed the amount of any invoice unless an out and expressly agreed in writing in the Contract and all such statements and objection is made in writing within 28 days of the date of the invoice. As soon as representations are hereby excluded to the fullest extent permitted by law. reasonably practicable after being notified of an objection, without prejudice to 2.4 The Client acknowledges that terms and conditions appearing on a Client’s clause 5.2 a member of GroundSure’s management team will contact the Client and order form, printed stationery or other communication, or any terms or conditions the parties shall then use all reasonable endeavours to resolve the dispute within 15 implied by custom, practice or course of dealing shall be of no effect, and that this days. Contract shall prevail over all others in relation to the Order. 6 Intellectual Property and Confidentiality 2.5 If the Client or Beneficiary requests insurance in conjunction with or as a result of the Services, GroundSure shall use reasonable endeavours to recommend such 6.1 Subject to insurance, but makes no warranty that such insurance shall be available from (i) full payment of all relevant Fees and insurers or that it will be offered on reasonable terms. Any insurance purchased by (ii) compliance with this Contract, the Client is granted (and is the Client or Beneficiary shall be subject solely to the terms of the policy issued by permitted to sub-licence to the Beneficiary) a royalty-free, worldwide, non- insurers and GroundSure will have no liability therefor. In addition you assignable and (save to the extent set out in this Contract) non-transferable licence acknowledge and agree that GroundSure does not act as an agent or broker for any to make use of the GroundSure Materials. insurance providers. The Client should take (and ensure that the Beneficiary takes) 6.2 All Intellectual Property in the GroundSure Materials are and shall remain independent advice to ensure that the insurance policy requested or offered is owned by GroundSure or GroundSure's licensors (including without limitation the suitable for its requirements. Third Party Data Providers) the Client acknowledges, and shall procure 2.6 GroundSure's quotations or proposals are valid for a period of 30 days only acknowledgement by the Beneficiary of, such ownership. Nothing in this Contract unless an alternative period of time is explicitly stipulated by GroundSure. purports to transfer or assign any rights to the Client or the Beneficiary in respect GroundSure reserves the right to withdraw any quotation or proposal at any time of such Intellectual Property. before an Order is accepted by GroundSure. GroundSure's acceptance of an Order 6.3 Third Party Data Providers may enforce any breach of clauses 6.1 and 6.2 against the Client or Beneficiary. 6.4 The Client shall, and shall procure that any recipients of the GroundSure days of the Payment Date; or Materials shall: (ii) the Client (being an individual) has a bankruptcy order made (i) not remove, suppress or modify any trade mark, copyright or against him or (being a company) shall enter into liquidation whether compulsory or other proprietary marking belonging to GroundSure or any third party from the voluntary or have an administration order made against it or if a receiver shall be Services; appointed over the whole or any part of its property assets or undertaking or if the (ii) use the information obtained as part of the Services in Client is struck off the Register of Companies or dissolved; or respect of the subject Site only, and shall not store or reuse any information (iii) the Client being a company is unable to pay its debts within obtained as part of the Services provided in respect of adjacent or nearby sites; the meaning of Section 123 of the Insolvency Act 1986 or being an individual (iii) not create any product or report which is derived directly or appears unable to pay his debts within the meaning of Section 268 of the Insolvency indirectly from the Services (save that those acting in a professional capacity to the Act 1986 or if the Client shall enter into a composition or arrangement with the Beneficiary may provide advice based upon the Services); Client’s creditors or shall suffer distress or execution to be levied on his goods; or (iv) not combine the Services with or incorporate such Services (iv) the Client or the Beneficiary breaches any term of the into any other information data or service; Contract (including, but not limited to, the obligations in clause 4) which is incapable (v) not reformat or otherwise change (whether by modification, of remedy or if remediable, is not remedied within five days of notice of the breach. addition or enhancement), the Services (save that those acting for the Beneficiary in 9. Client’s Right to Terminate and Suspend a professional capacity shall not be in breach of this clause 6.4(v) where such reformatting is in the normal course of providing advice based upon the Services); 9.1 Subject to clause 10.1, the Client may at any time upon written notice terminate (vi) where a Report and/or Mapping contains material belonging or suspend the provision of all or any of the Services. to Ordnance Survey, acknowledge and agree that such content is protected by 9.2 In any event, where the Client is a consumer (and not a business) he/she hereby Crown Copyright and shall not use such content for any purpose outside of expressly acknowledges and agrees that: receiving the Services; and (i) the supply of Services under this Contract (and therefore the (vii) not copy in whole or in part by any means any map prints or performance of this Contract) commences immediately upon GroundSure's run-on copies containing content belonging to Ordnance Survey (other than that acceptance of the Order; and contained within Ordnance Survey’s OS Street Map) without first being in (ii) the Reports and/or Mapping provided under this Contract are possession of a valid Paper Map Copying Licence from Ordnance Survey, (a) supplied to the Client's specification(s) and in any event 6.5 Notwithstanding clause 6.4, the Client may make reasonable use of the (b) by their nature cannot be returned. GroundSure Materials in order to advise the Beneficiary in a professional capacity. 10 Consequences of Withdrawal, Termination or Suspension However, GroundSure shall have no liability in respect of any advice, opinion or 10.1 Upon termination of the Contract: report given or provided to Beneficiaries by the Client. (i) GroundSure shall take steps to bring to an end the Services in 6.6 The Client shall procure that any person to whom the Services are made an orderly manner, vacate any Site with all reasonable speed and shall deliver to the available shall notify GroundSure of any request or requirement to disclose, publish Client and/or Beneficiary any property of the Client and/or Beneficiary in or disseminate any information contained in the Services in accordance with the GroundSure’s possession or control; and Freedom of Information Act 2000, the Environmental Information Regulations (ii) the Client shall pay to GroundSure all and any Fees payable in 2004 or any associated legislation or regulations in force from time to time. respect of the performance of the Services up to the date of termination or 7.Liability: Particular Attention Should Be Paid To This Clause suspension. In respect of any Support Services provided, the Client shall also pay 7.1 This Clause 7 sets out the entire liability of GroundSure, including any liability GroundSure any additional costs incurred in relation to the termination or for the acts or omissions of its employees, agents, consultants, subcontractors and suspension of the Contract. Third Party Content, in respect of: 11 Anti-Bribery (i) any breach of contract, including any deliberate breach of 11.1 The Client warrants that it shall: the Contract by GroundSure or its employees, agents or (i) comply with all applicable laws, statutes and regulations subcontractors; relating to anti-bribery and anti-corruption including but not limited to the Bribery (ii) any use made of the Reports, Services, Materials or any Act 2010; part of them; and (ii) comply with such of GroundSure's anti-bribery and anti- (iii) any representation, statement or tortious act or omission corruption policies as are notified to the Client from time to time; and (including negligence) arising under or in connection with the Contract. (iii) promptly report to GroundSure any request or demand for 7.2 All warranties, conditions and other terms implied by statute or common law any undue financial or other advantage of any kind received by or on behalf of the are, to the fullest extent permitted by law, excluded from the Contract. Client in connection with the performance of this Contract. 7.3 Nothing in the Contract limits or excludes the liability of the Supplier for death 11.2 Breach of this Clause 11 shall be deemed a material breach of this Contract. or personal injury resulting from negligence, or for any damage or liability incurred by the Client or Beneficiary as a result of fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation. 12 General 7.4 GroundSure shall not be liable for 12.1 The Mapping contained in the Services is protected by Crown copyright and (i) loss of profits; must not be used for any purpose other than as part of the Services or as specifically (ii) loss of business; provided in the Contract. (iii) depletion of goodwill and/or similar losses; 12.2 The Client shall be permitted to make one copy only of each Report or (iv) loss of anticipated savings; Mapping Order. Thereafter the Client shall be entitled to make unlimited copies of (v) loss of goods; the Report or Mapping Order only in accordance with an Ordnance Survey paper (vi) loss of contract; map copy license available through GroundSure. (vii) loss of use; 12.3 GroundSure reserves the right to amend or vary this Contract. No amendment (viii) loss or corruption of data or information; or variation to this Contract shall be valid unless signed by an authorised (ix) business interruption; representative of GroundSure. (x) any kind of special, indirect, consequential or pure economic 12.4 No failure on the part of GroundSure to exercise, and no delay in exercising, loss, costs, damages, charges or expenses; any right, power or provision under this Contract shall operate as a waiver thereof. (xi) loss or damage that arise as a result of the use of all or part of 12.5 Save as expressly provided in this Contract, no person other than the persons the GroundSure Materials in breach of the Contract; set out therein shall have any right under the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act (xii) loss or damage arising as a result of any error, omission or 1999 to enforce any terms of the Contract. inaccuracy in any part of the GroundSure Materials where such error, omission or 12.6 The Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills (“BIS”) or BIS’ inaccuracy is caused by any Third Party Content or any reasonable interpretation of successor body, as the case may be, acting through Ordnance Survey may enforce a Third Party Content; breach of clause 6.4(vi) and clause 6.4(vii) of these terms and conditions against the (xiii) loss or damage to a computer, software, modem, telephone or Client in accordance with the provisions of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) other property; and Act 1999. (xiv) loss or damage caused by a delay or loss of use of 12.7 GroundSure shall not be liable to the Client if the provision of the Services is GroundSure’s internet ordering service. delayed or prevented by one or more of the following circumstances: 7.5 GroundSure’s total liability in relation to or under the Contract shall be limited (i) the Client or Beneficiary’s failure to provide facilities, access to £10 million for any claim or claims. or information; 7.6 GroundSure shall procure that the Beneficiary shall be bound by limitations and (ii) fire, storm, flood, tempest or epidemic; exclusions of liability in favour of GroundSure which accord with those detailed in (iii) Acts of God or the public enemy; clauses 7.4 and 7.5 (subject to clause 7.3) in respect of all claims which the (iv) riot, civil commotion or war; Beneficiary may bring against GroundSure in relation to the Services or other (v) strikes, labour disputes or industrial action; matters arising pursuant to the Contract. (vi) acts or regulations of any governmental or other agency; 8 GroundSure’s right to suspend or terminate (vii) suspension or delay of services at public registries by Third Party Data Providers; 8.1 If GroundSure reasonably believes that the Client or Beneficiary has not (viii) changes in law; or provided the information or assistance required to enable the proper provision of (ix) any other reason beyond GroundSure’s reasonable control. the Services, GroundSure shall be entitled to suspend all further performance of the In the event that GroundSure is prevented from performing the Services (or any Services until such time as any such deficiency has been made good. part thereof) in accordance with this clause 12.6 for a period of not less than 30 8.2 GroundSure shall be entitled to terminate the Contract immediately on written days then GroundSure shall be entitled to terminate this Contract immediately on notice in the event that: written notice to the Client. (i) the Client fails to pay any sum due to GroundSure within 30 12.8 Any notice provided shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered by hand or sent by first class post, facsimile or by email to the address, facsimile number or email address of the relevant party as may have been notified by each party to the other for such purpose or in the absence of such notification the last known address. 12.9 Such notice shall be deemed to have been received on the day of delivery if delivered by hand, facsimile or email (save to the extent such day is not a working day where it shall be deemed to have been delivered on the next working day) and on the second working day after the day of posting if sent by first class post. 12.10 The Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and shall supersede all previous arrangements between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. 12.11 Each of the provisions of the Contract is severable and distinct from the others and if one or more provisions is or should become invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be tainted or impaired. 12.12 This Contract shall be governed by and construed in accordance with English law and any proceedings arising out of or connected with this Contract shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts. 12.13 GroundSure is an executive member of the Council of Property Search Organisation (CoPSO) and has signed up to the Search Code administered by the Property Codes Compliance Board (PCCB). All Risk Screening Reports shall be supplied in accordance with the provisions of the Search Code. 12.14 If the Client or Beneficiary has a complaint about the Services, written notice should be given to the Compliance Officer at GroundSure who will respond in a timely manner. 12.15 The Client agrees that it shall, and shall procure that each Beneficiary shall, treat in confidence all Confidential Information and shall not, and shall procure that each Beneficiary shall not (i) disclose any Confidential Information to any third party other than in accordance with the terms of this Contract; and (ii) use Confidential Information for a purpose other than the exercise of its rights and obligations under this Contract. Subject to clause 6.6, nothing shall prevent the Client or any Beneficiary from disclosing Confidential Information to the extent required by law

© GroundSure Limited June 2013 EmapSite GroundSure EMS-239947_320585 Reference: Masdar House, , Eversley, RG27 0RP Your Reference: EMS_239947_320585

Report Date 3 Mar 2014

Report Delivery Email - pdf Method:

GroundSure EnviroInsight

Address: Glenmore Farm,

Dear Sir/ Madam,

Thank you for placing your order with GroundSure. Please find enclosed the GroundSure Enviroinsight as requested.

If you would like further assistance regarding this report then please contact the emapsite customer services team on 0118 9736883 quoting the above report reference number.

Yours faithfully,

emapsite customer services team

Enc. GroundSure EnviroInsight GroundSure EnviroInsight

Address: Glenmore Farm,

Date: 3 Mar 2014

Reference: EMS-239947_320585

Client: EmapSite

NW N NE

W E

SW S SE Aerial Photograph Capture date: 17-Aug-2005 Grid Reference: 386361,152826 Site Size: 9.80ha Contents Page

Contents Page ...... 3 Overview of Findings...... 5 Using this report...... 8 1. Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers Map...... 9 1. Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers...... 10 1.1 Industrial Sites Holding Licences and/or Authorisations...... 10 1.1.1 Records of historic IPC Authorisations within 500m of the study site:...... 10 1.1.2 Records of Part A(1) and IPPC Authorised Activities within 500m of the study site:...... 10 1.1.3 Records of Water Industry Referrals (potentially harmful discharges to the public sewer) within 500m of the study site:...... 10 1.1.4 Records of Red List Discharge Consents (potentially harmful discharges to controlled waters) within 500m of the study site:...... 10 1.1.5 Records of List 1 Dangerous Substances Inventory Sites within 500m of the study site:...... 10 1.1.6 Records of List 2 Dangerous Substance Inventory Sites within 500m of the study site:...... 11 1.1.7 Records of Part A(2) and Part B Activities and Enforcements within 500m of the study site: ...... 11 1.1.8 Records of Category 3 or 4 Radioactive Substances Authorisations:...... 11 1.1.9 Records of Licensed Discharge Consents within 500m of the study site:...... 12 1.1.10 Records of Planning Hazardous Substance Consents and Enforcements within 500m of the study site:...... 13 1.2 Dangerous or Hazardous Sites...... 13 1.3 Environment Agency Recorded Pollution Incidents...... 13 1.3.1 Records of National Incidents Recording System, List 2 within 500m of the study site:...... 13 1.3.2 Records of National Incidents Recording System, List 1 within 500m of the study site:...... 14 1.4 Sites Determined as Contaminated Land under Part 2A EPA 1990...... 14 2. Landfill and Other Waste Sites Map...... 15 2. Landfill and Other Waste Sites...... 16 2.1 Landfill Sites...... 16 2.1.1 Records from Environment Agency landfill data within 1000m of the study site: ...... 16 2.1.2 Records of Environment Agency historic landfill sites within 1500m of the study site: ...... 16 2.1.3 Records of BGS/DoE non-operational landfill sites within 1500m of the study site:...... 17 2.1.4 Records of Local Authority landfill sites within 1500m of the study site:...... 17 2.2 Other Waste Sites...... 18 2.2.1 Records of waste treatment, transfer or disposal sites within 500m of the study site: ...... 18 2.2.2 Records of Environment Agency licensed waste sites within 1500m of the study site: ...... 18 3. Current Land Use Map...... 23 3. Current Land Uses...... 24 3.1 Current Industrial Data...... 24 3.2 Petrol and Fuel Sites...... 25 3.3 Underground High Pressure Oil and Gas Pipelines...... 25 4. Geology...... 26 4.1 Artificial Ground and Made Ground...... 26 4.2 Superficial Ground and Drift Geology ...... 26 4.3 Bedrock and Solid Geology ...... 26 5. Hydrogeology and Hydrology...... 27 5a. Aquifer Within Superficial Geology...... 27 5b. Aquifer Within Bedrock Geology and Abstraction Licenses...... 28 5c. Hydrogeology – Source Protection Zones and Potable Water Abstraction Licenses...... 29 5d. Hydrology – Detailed River Network and River Quality...... 30 5. Hydrogeology and Hydrology...... 31 5.1 Aquifer within Superficial Deposits...... 31 5.2 Aquifer within Bedrock Deposits...... 31 5.3 Groundwater Abstraction Licences...... 32 5.4 Surface Water Abstraction Licences...... 32 5.5 Potable Water Abstraction Licences...... 32 5.6 Source Protection Zones...... 32 5.7 River Quality...... 32 5.7.1 Biological Quality:...... 33 5.7.2 Chemical Quality:...... 33 5.8 Detailed River Network...... 34 5.9 Surface Water Features ...... 34 6. Environment Agency Flood Map for planning (from rivers and the sea)...... 35 6. Flooding...... 36 6.1 Zone 2 Flooding...... 36 6.2 Zone 3 Flooding...... 36 6.3 Flood Defences...... 36 6.4 Areas benefiting from Flood Defences...... 36 6.5 Areas benefiting from Flood Storage...... 36 6.6 Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Areas...... 37 6.6.1 Are there any British Geological Survey groundwater flooding susceptibility areas within 50m of the boundary of the study site?...... 37 6.6.2 What is the highest susceptibility to groundwater flooding in the search area based on the underlying geological conditions?...... 37 6.7 Groundwater Flooding Confidence Areas...... 37 7. Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Map...... 38 7. Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites...... 39 7.1 Records of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) within 2000m of the study site:...... 39 7.2 Records of National Nature Reserves (NNR) within 2000m of the study site:...... 39 7.3 Records of Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) within 2000m of the study site:...... 39 7.4 Records of Special Protection Areas (SPA) within 2000m of the study site:...... 39 7.5 Records of Ramsar sites within 2000m of the study site:...... 39 7.6 Records of Ancient Woodland within 2000m of the study site: ...... 40 7.7 Records of Local Nature Reserves (LNR) within 2000m of the study site:...... 40 7.8 Records of World Heritage Sites within 2000m of the study site:...... 40 7.9 Records of Environmentally Sensitive Areas within 2000m of the study site: ...... 40 7.10 Records of Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) within 2000m of the study site: ...... 41 7.11 Records of National Parks (NP) within 2000m of the study site: ...... 41 7.12 Records of Nitrate Sensitive Areas within 2000m of the study site:...... 41 7.13 Records of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones within 2000m of the study site:...... 41 8. Natural Hazards Findings...... 42 8.1 Detailed BGS GeoSure Data...... 42 8.1.1 Shrink Swell...... 42 8.1.2 Landslides...... 42 8.1.3 Soluble Rocks...... 42 8.1.4 Compressible Ground...... 43 8.1.5 Collapsible Rocks...... 43 8.1.6 Running Sand...... 43 9. Mining...... 44 9.1 Coal Mining...... 44 9.2 Shallow Mining...... 44 9.3 Brine Affected Areas ...... 44 Contact Details...... 45 Standard Terms and Conditions...... 46 Overview of Findings

For further details on each dataset, please refer to each individual section in the main report as listed. Where the database has been searched a numerical result will be recorded. Where the database has not been searched '-' will be recorded.

Section 1: Environmental Permits, On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 Incidents and Registers

1.1 Industrial Sites Holding Environmental Permits and/or Authorisations

1.1.1 Records of historic IPC Authorisations 0 0 0 0

1.1.2 Records of Part A(1) and IPPC Authorised Activities 0 0 0 0

1.1.3 Records of Water Industry Referrals (potentially harmful 0 0 0 0 discharges to the public sewer)

1.1.4 Records of Red List Discharge Consents (potentially harmful 0 0 0 0 discharges to controlled waters)

1.1.5 Records of List 1 Dangerous Substances Inventory sites 0 0 0 0

1.1.6 Records of List 2 Dangerous Substances Inventory sites 0 0 0 0

1.1.7 Records of Part A(2) and Part B Activities and Enforcements 0 0 3 1

1.1.8 Records of Category 3 or 4 Radioactive Substances 0 0 0 0 Authorisations

1.1.9 Records of Licensed Discharge Consents 0 0 6 6

1.1.10 Records of Planning Hazardous Substance Consents and 0 0 0 0 Enforcements

1.2 Records of COMAH and NIHHS sites 0 0 0 0

1.3 Environment Agency Recorded Pollution Incidents

1.3.1 National Incidents Recording System, List 2 0 0 1 3

1.3.2 National Incidents Recording System, List 1 0 0 0 0

1.4 Sites Determined as Contaminated Land under Part 2A EPA 1990 0 0 0 0

Section 2: Landfill and Other Waste 1000- On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000 Sites 5000

2.1 Landfill Sites

2.1.1 Environment Agency Registered Landfill Sites 0 0 0 0 0 Not searched

2.1.2 Environment Agency Historic Landfill Sites 0 1 0 4 1 1

2.1.3 BGS/DoE Landfill Site Survey 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.1.4 GroundSure Local Authority Landfill Sites Data 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.2 Landfill and Other Waste Sites Findings

2.2.1 Operational and Non-Operational Waste Treatment, Transfer 0 1 0 1 Not searched Not searched and Disposal Sites

2.2.2 Environment Agency Licensed Waste Sites 0 0 0 6 9 5 Section 3: Current Land Use On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500

3.1 Current Industrial Sites Data 0 1 21 Not searched

3.2 Records of Petrol and Fuel Sites 0 0 1 0

3.3 Underground High Pressure Oil and Gas Pipelines 0 0 0 0

Section 4: Geology

4.1 Are there any records of Artificial Ground and Made Ground No present beneath the study site?

4.2 Are there any records of Superficial Ground and Drift Geology None present beneath the study site?

4.3 For records of Bedrock and Solid Geology beneath the study site see the detailed findings section.

Section 5: Hydrogeology and Hydrology 0-500m

5.1 Are there any records of Strata Classification in the Superficial Yes Geology within 500m of the study site?

5.2 Are there any records of Strata Classification in the Bedrock Yes Geology within 500m of the study site? 1000- On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000 2000 5.3 Groundwater Abstraction Licences (within 2000m of the study 0 0 0 0 0 0 site)

5.4 Surface Water Abstraction Licences (within 2000m of the study 0 0 0 0 0 1 site)

5.5 Potable Water Abstraction Licences (within 2000m of the study 0 0 0 0 0 0 site)

5.6 Source Protection Zones (within 500m of the study site) 0 0 0 0 Not searched Not searched 1000- On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000 1500 5.7 Is there any Environment Agency information on river quality No No No No Yes Yes within 1500m of the study site?

5.8 Detailed River Network entries within 500m of the site 0 0 0 4 Not searched Not searched

5.9 Surface water features within 250m of the study site No No Yes Not searched Not searched Not searched

Section 6: Flooding

6.1 Are there any Environment Agency Zone 2 floodplains within No 250m of the study site?

6.2 Are there any Environment Agency Zone 3 floodplains within No 250m of the study site?

6.3 Are there any Flood Defences within 250m of the study site? No

6.4 Are there any areas benefiting from Flood Defences within 250m No of the study site?

6.5 Are there any areas used for Flood Storage within 250m of the No study site?

6.6 What is the maximum BGS Groundwater Flooding susceptibility Very Low within 50m of the study site?

6.7 What is the BGS confidence rating for the Groundwater Flooding High susceptibility areas? Section 7: Designated Environmentally 1000- On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000 Sensitive Sites 2000

7.1 Records of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) 0 0 0 0 0 2

7.2 Records of National Nature Reserves (NNR) 0 0 0 0 0 0

7.3 Records of Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) 0 0 0 0 0 0

7.4 Records of Special Protection Areas (SPA) 0 0 0 0 0 0

7.5 Records of Ramsar sites 0 0 0 0 0 0

7.6 Records of Ancient Woodlands 0 0 0 0 1 12

7.7 Records of Local Nature Reserves (LNR) 0 0 0 0 0 0

7.8 Records of World Heritage Sites 0 0 0 0 0 0

7.9 Records of Environmentally Sensitive Areas 0 0 0 0 0 0

7.10 Records of Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) 0 0 0 0 0 0

7.11 Records of National Parks 0 0 0 0 0 0

7.12 Records of Nitrate Sensitive Areas 0 0 0 0 0 0

7.13 Records of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones 0 0 0 0 0 1

Section 8: Natural Hazards

8.1 What is the maximum risk of natural ground subsidence? Moderate

Section 9: Mining

9.1 Are there any coal mining areas within 75m of the study site? No

9.2 What is the risk of subsidence relating to shallow mining within Negligible 150m of the study site?

9.3 Are there any brine affected areas within 75m of the study site? No Using this report

The following report is designed by Environmental Consultants for Environmental Professionals bringing together the most up-to-date market leading environmental data. This report is provided under and subject to the Terms & Condi - tions agreed between GroundSure and the Client. The document contains the following sections: 1. Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers Provides information on Regulated Industrial Activities and Pollution Incidents as recorded by Regulatory Authorit- ies, and sites determined as Contaminated Land. This search is conducted using radii up to 500m. 2. Landfills and Other Waste Sites Provides information on landfills and other waste sites that may pose a risk to the study site. This search is conducted using radii up to 1500m. 3. Current Land Uses Provides information on current land uses that may pose a risk to the study site in terms of potential contamination from activities or processes. These searches are conducted using radii of up to 500m. This includes information on po- tentially contaminative industrial sites, petrol stations and fuel sites as well as high pressure underground oil and gas pipelines. 4. Geology Provides information on artificial and superficial deposits and bedrock beneath the study site. 5. Hydrogeology and Hydrology Provides information on productive strata within the bedrock and superficial geological layers, abstraction licenses, Source Protection Zones (SPZs) and river quality. These searches are conducted using radii of up to 2000m. 6. Flooding Provides information on surface water flooding, flood defences, flood storage areas and groundwater flood areas. This search is conducted using radii of up to 250m. 7. Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Provides information on the Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), National Nature Reserves (NNR), Special Areas of Conservation (SAC), Special Protection Areas (SPA), Ramsar sites, Local Nature Reserves (LNR), Areas of Outstand- ing Natural Beauty (AONB), National Parks (NP), Environmentally Sensitive Areas, Nitrate Sensitive Areas, Nitrate Vulnerable Zones and World Heritage Sites and Scheduled Ancient Woodland. These searches are conducted using radii of up to 2000m. 8. Natural Hazards Provides information on a range of natural hazards that may pose a risk to the study site. These factors include natural ground subsidence. 9. Mining Provides information on areas of coal and shallow mining. 10. Contacts This section of the report provides contact points for statutory bodies and data providers that may be able to provide further information on issues raised within this report. Alternatively, GroundSure provide a free Technical Helpline (08444 159000) for further information and guidance. Note: Maps Only certain features are placed on the maps within the report. All features represented on maps found within this search are given an identification number. This number identifies the feature on the mapping and correlates it to the additional information provided below. This identification number precedes all other information and takes the fol- lowing format -Id: 1, Id: 2, etc. Where numerous features on the same map are in such close proximity that the num - bers would obscure each other a letter identifier is used instead to represent the features. (e.g. Three features which overlap may be given the identifier “A” on the map and would be identified separately as features 1A, 3A, 10A on the data tables provided). Where a feature is reported in the data tables to a distance greater than the map area, it is noted in the data table as “Not Shown”. All distances given in this report are in Metres (m). Directions are given as compass headings such as N: North, E: East, NE: North East from the nearest point of the study site boundary. 1. Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers Map

NW N NE

W E

SW S SE Environmental Permits, © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Incidents and Registers Legend Ordnance Survey license 100035207.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 9 1. Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers

1.1 Industrial Sites Holding Licences and/or Authorisations

Searches of information provided by the Environment Agency and Local Authorities reveal the following information:

1.1.1 Records of historic IPC Authorisations within 500m of the study site: 0

Database searched and no data found.

1.1.2 Records of Part A(1) and IPPC Authorised Activities within 500m of the study site:

0

Database searched and no data found.

1.1.3 Records of Water Industry Referrals (potentially harmful discharges to the public sewer) within 500m of the study site:

0

Database searched and no data found.

1.1.4 Records of Red List Discharge Consents (potentially harmful discharges to controlled waters) within 500m of the study site:

0

Database searched and no data found.

1.1.5 Records of List 1 Dangerous Substances Inventory Sites within 500m of the study site:

0

Database searched and no data found.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 10 1.1.6 Records of List 2 Dangerous Substance Inventory Sites within 500m of the study site:

0

Database searched and no data found.

1.1.7 Records of Part A(2) and Part B Activities and Enforcements within 500m of the study site:

4

The following Part A(2) and Part B Activities are represented as points on the Authorisations, Incidents and Registers map:

ID Distance Direction NGR Details

Address: ATR Compounding formerly Avon European Mixing, West Wiltshire Enforcement: No Enforcements Notified 386101 Trading Estate, Westbury Date of Enforcement: No Enforcements 17C 68.0 NW 152920 Process: Rubber Notified Status: Current Permit Comment: No Enforcements Notified Permit Type: Part B Address: Westbury Mill - Avon Cory Way, West Wilts Trading Estate, Westbury, Enforcement: No Enforcements Notified 386105 Wiltshire Date of Enforcement: No Enforcements 18C 75.0 NW 152938 Process: Rubber Manufacture Notified Status: Historical Permit Comment: No Enforcements Notified Permit Type: Part B Address: Satchell Motor Service House, Enforcement: No Enforcements Notified WWTE, Westbury, BA13 4JB 386206 Date of Enforcement: No Enforcements 19D 191.0 NW Process: Waste Oil Burner 153218 Notified Status: Current Permit Comment: No Enforcements Notified Permit Type: Part B Address: Celcon Blocks Ltd, 3 Quartermaster Road, West Wilts Trading Enforcement: No Enforcements Notified 385700 Estate, Westbury, Wiltshire, BA13 4JT Date of Enforcement: No Enforcements 20 471.0 W 152800 Process: Bulk Cement Notified Status: Historical Permit Comment: No Enforcements Notified Permit Type: Part B

1.1.8 Records of Category 3 or 4 Radioactive Substances Authorisations:

0

Database searched and no data found.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 11 1.1.9 Records of Licensed Discharge Consents within 500m of the study site:

12

The following Licensed Discharge Consents records are represented as points on the Authorisations, Incidents and Registers map:

ID Distance Direction NGR Details

Address: Link Road, Plot 33, West Wilts Trading Receiving Water: Tributary Of Biss Brook Est, Westbury, Wiltshire, BA13 4VB Status: Revoked - Unspecified 386200 Effluent Type: Miscellaneous Discharges - 5D 180.0 NW Issue date: - 153200 Surface Water Effective Date: 1/8/1989 Permit Number: 011366 Revocation Date: - Permit Version: 1 Address: Mill Lane Farm Buildings, Mill Lane, Receiving Water: Ditch Hawkeridge, Westbury, Wiltshire, BA13 4LD Status: New Consent (wra 91, S88 & Sched 10 386450 Effluent Type: Sewage Discharges - As Amended By Env Act 1995) 6 191.0 NE 153270 Final/treated Effluent - Not Water Company Issue date: 5/11/2001 Permit Number: 101607 Effective Date: - Permit Version: 1 Revocation Date: - Address: The Barn, Mill Lane, Westbury, Receiving Water: Trib Of Bitham Brook Via P/s Wiltshire, BA13 4LD Status: New Consent (wra 91, S88 & Sched 10 386510 Effluent Type: Sewage Discharges - As Amended By Env Act 1995) 7 192.0 NE 153230 Final/treated Effluent - Not Water Company Issue date: 18/7/2006 Permit Number: 103487 Effective Date: 18/7/2006 Permit Version: 1 Revocation Date: - Address: Hawkeridge Farm, Mill Lane, Receiving Water: Trib Of Bitham Brook Hawkeridge, Westbury, Wiltshire, BA13 4LD Status: New Consent, By Application (wra 91, 386510 Effluent Type: Sewage Discharges - Section 113 & Sched 12) 8A 230.0 NE 153280 Final/treated Effluent - Not Water Company Issue date: - Permit Number: 011961 Effective Date: - Permit Version: 1 Revocation Date: - Address: 3 Link Road, West Wilts Trading Est, Receiving Water: Stream Westbury, Wilts, Ba13 4jb Status: Consent Revoked - Discharge Ceased 386080 Effluent Type: Miscellaneous Discharges - (section 37(1)) 9 241.0 NW 153180 Surface Water Issue date: - Permit Number: 010416 Effective Date: 1/7/1988 Permit Version: 1 Revocation Date: - Address: Hawkeridge Farm, Mill Lane, Receiving Water: Trib Of Bitham Brook Hawkeridge, Westbury, Wiltshire, BA13 4LD Status: New Consent, By Application (wra 91, 10 386530 Effluent Type: Sewage Discharges - Section 113 & Sched 12) 250.0 NE A 153290 Final/treated Effluent - Not Water Company Issue date: - Permit Number: 011961 Effective Date: - Permit Version: 1 Revocation Date: - Receiving Water: Trib Of Biss Brook Address: Hawkeridge Park Ps, Westbury Status: Revoked (wra 91, S88 & Sched 10 As Effluent Type: Sewage Discharges - Pumping 386100 Amended By Env Act 1995) 11 274.0 SW Station - Water Company 152500 Issue date: - Permit Number: 010623 Effective Date: - Permit Version: 1 Revocation Date: - Address: West Wilts Trading Estate, Westbury, Receiving Water: Ditch Wiltshire, BA13 4JT Status: Lapsed Under Schedule 23 12 386000 Effluent Type: Miscellaneous Discharges - Environment Act 1995 320.0 NW B 153210 Surface Water Issue date: - Permit Number: 010365 Effective Date: 1/4/1989 Permit Version: 1 Revocation Date: 1/10/1996 Address: West Wilts Trading Estate, Westbury, Receiving Water: Tributary Of River Biss Wiltshire, BA13 4JT Status: New Consent (wra 91, S88 & Sched 10 13 386000 Effluent Type: Miscellaneous Discharges - As Amended By Env Act 1995) 320.0 NW B 153210 Surface Water Issue date: 12/2/1997 Permit Number: 100172 Effective Date: 12/2/1997 Permit Version: 1 Revocation Date: -

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 12 ID Distance Direction NGR Details

Address: Grounds Of 44 The Ham, Westbury, Receiving Water: Soakaway Wilts, BA13 4HD Status: New Consent (wra 91, S88 & Sched 10 386080 Effluent Type: Sewage Discharges - As Amended By Env Act 1995) 14 429.0 SW 152290 Final/treated Effluent - Not Water Company Issue date: - Permit Number: 101617 Effective Date: 4/9/2001 Permit Version: 1 Revocation Date: - Address: Four Dwellings, Hawkeridge Mill, Receiving Water: Trib Of Biss Brook Hawkeridge, Westbury, Wiltshire Status: New Consent, By Application (wra 91, 386730 Effluent Type: Sewage Discharges - Section 88) 15 432.0 NE 153340 Final/treated Effluent - Not Water Company Issue date: - Permit Number: 010516 Effective Date: 1/2/1989 Permit Version: 1 Revocation Date: - Address: Four Dwellings, Hawkeridge Mill, Receiving Water: Trib Of Biss Brook Hawkeridge, Westbury, Wiltshire Status: New Consent, By Application (wra 91, 386710 Effluent Type: Sewage Discharges - Section 88) 16 454.0 NE 153400 Final/treated Effluent - Not Water Company Issue date: - Permit Number: 010516 Effective Date: 1/2/1989 Permit Version: 1 Revocation Date: -

1.1.10 Records of Planning Hazardous Substance Consents and Enforcements within 500m of the study site:

0

Database searched and no data found.

1.2 Dangerous or Hazardous Sites

Records of COMAH & NIHHS sites within 500m of the study site: 0

Database searched and no data found.

1.3 Environment Agency Recorded Pollution Incidents

1.3.1 Records of National Incidents Recording System, List 2 within 500m of the study site:

4

The following NIRS List 2 records are represented as points on the Authorisations, Incidents and Registers Map:

ID Distance Direction NGR Details

Incident Date: 06/03/2003 Water Impact: Category 4 (No Impact) 386650 Incident Identification: 141397 1 200.0 SE Land Impact: Category 3 (Minor) 152530 Pollutant: Oils and Fuel Air Impact: Category 4 (No Impact) Pollutant Description: Diesel Incident Date: 11/12/2001 Water Impact: Category 4 (No Impact) 385920 Incident Identification: 47716 2 290.0 NW Land Impact: Category 3 (Minor) 153050 Pollutant: Specific Waste Materials Air Impact: Category 4 (No Impact) Pollutant Description: Metal Wastes

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 13 ID Distance Direction NGR Details

Incident Date: 17/02/2003 Incident Identification: 137488 Water Impact: Category 4 (No Impact) 386240 3 417.0 SW Pollutant: Specific Waste Materials Land Impact: Category 3 (Minor) 152180 Pollutant Description: Vehicles and Vehicle Air Impact: Category 4 (No Impact) Parts Incident Date: 05/08/2003 Incident Identification: 179297 Water Impact: Category 4 (No Impact) 386098 Pollutant: Atmospheric Pollutants and 4 432.0 SW Land Impact: Category 4 (No Impact) 152265 Effects Air Impact: Category 2 (Significant) Pollutant Description: Damage to Buildings, Vehicles and Vegetation

1.3.2 Records of National Incidents Recording System, List 1 within 500m of the study site:

0

Database searched and no data found.

1.4 Sites Determined as Contaminated Land under Part 2A EPA 1990

How many records of sites determined as contaminated land under Section 78R of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 are there within 500m of the study site? 0

Database searched and no data found.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 14 2. Landfill and Other Waste Sites Map

NW N NE

W E

SW S SE Landfill and Other Waste Sites Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 15 2. Landfill and Other Waste Sites

2.1 Landfill Sites

2.1.1 Records from Environment Agency landfill data within 1000m of the study site:

0

Database searched and no data found.

2.1.2 Records of Environment Agency historic landfill sites within 1500m of the study site:

7

The following landfill records are represented as either points or polygons on the Landfill and Other Waste Sites map:

ID Distance (m) Direction NGR Details

Site Address: Former Railway Cutting, Heywood, Westbury, Wiltshire Licence Issue: 17-Nov-1976 Waste Licence: Yes Licence Surrendered: 17-Oct-1985 Site Reference: W/76/0005/WD, W/74/0234, 386500 Licence Hold Address: Part of Western Fuel 3 26.0 NE W/76/0006/WD, 3900/3332 153000 Company Group, Westbury Station, Waste Type: Inert, Industrial, Commercial, Westbury, Wiltshire Household Operator: - Environmental Permitting Regulations (Waste) Reference: - Site Address: Site Adjoining Railway Station, Westbury, Bristol, Avon Waste Licence: - Licence Issue: Site Reference: W/86.0018/WD, 386200 Licence Surrendered: 4 296.0 SW W/81/0034/WD, W/86.0018, 152100 Licence Hold Address: - W/79/0028/WD, W/77/0018/WD Operator: - Waste Type: Inert Environmental Permitting Regulations (Waste) Reference: - Site Address: Builders Tip at Slag Lane, Slag Lane, Westbury, Wiltshire Waste Licence: Yes Licence Issue: 21-Apr-1977 386900 Site Reference: W/85/0016A/WD, Licence Surrendered: 5 324.0 E 152600 W/77/0016/WD Licence Hold Address: - Waste Type: Inert Operator: - Environmental Permitting Regulations (Waste) Reference: - Site Address: Land at Slag Lane, Westbury, Wiltshire Licence Issue: 28-Jan-1988 Waste Licence: Yes Licence Surrendered: 387000 Site Reference: W/85/0038, W86 0038A WD, 6 362.0 E Licence Hold Address: Brittle Springs Farm, 1 152700 W86003CA Westbury Road, Heywood, Westbury Waste Type: Inert Operator: - Environmental Permitting Regulations (Waste) Reference: -

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 16 ID Distance (m) Direction NGR Details

Site Address: Land at Slag Lane, Westbury Waste Licence: - Site Reference: W/88/0059, W/85/0038/WD, Licence Issue: 387000 W/86/0038A/WD Licence Surrendered: 7 409.0 NE 152900 Waste Type: Inert, Industrial, Commercial, Licence Hold Address: - Household Operator: - Environmental Permitting Regulations (Waste) Reference: - Site Address: Riding School, Heywood Riding Stables, Westbury, Wiltshire Licence Issue: 04-Aug-1989 Waste Licence: Yes Licence Surrendered: Not 387100 986.0 NE Site Reference: W/89/0062/WD, W890521 Licence Hold Address: c/o Hussey & Son, shown 153700 Waste Type: Inert Silver Street Lane, Trowbridge, Wiltshire Environmental Permitting Regulations Operator: - (Waste) Reference: - Site Address: Westbury Cement Works, Trowbridge Road, Westbury, Wiltshire Waste Licence: Yes Licence Issue: 20-Oct-1976 Not 388300 Site Reference: W/81/0001A/WD Licence Surrendered: 06-Jul-2000 1391.0 E shown 152800 Waste Type: Inert, Industrial, Commercial, Licence Hold Address: - Household, Special Operator: - Environmental Permitting Regulations (Waste) Reference: EM1/L/HAU001

2.1.3 Records of BGS/DoE non-operational landfill sites within 1500m of the study site:

0

Database searched and no data found.

2.1.4 Records of Local Authority landfill sites within 1500m of the study site:

0

Database searched and no data found.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 17 2.2 Other Waste Sites

2.2.1 Records of waste treatment, transfer or disposal sites within 500m of the study site:

2

The following waste treatment, transfer or disposal sites records are represented as points on the Landfill and Other Waste Sites map:

Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m)

Further Details: Scheme comprises construction of a single storey steel framed, steel clad building of 1,242 sqm for use as a waste transfer and recycling station. Scheme includes a vehicle wash, 10 parking spaces and drainage Construction - block, profiled steel cladng Type of Site: Waste walls; insitu concrete floor; profiled steel cladding roof; Transfer Station steel frame. Scheme comprises construction of a single Site Address: Corey Planning Application storey steel framed, steel clad building of 1,242 sqm for 386098 Way, West Wilts Reference: 02/1474 1 49.0 NW use as a waste transfer and recycling station. Scheme 152927 Trading Estate, Date: - includes a vehicle wash,10 parking spaces and drainage WESTBURY, Tender details remain to be finalised. An application Wiltshire, BA13 4QT (ref: 02/1474) for Detailed Planning permission was withdrawn from West Wiltshire D.C. on 30th June 2003. Detailed plans submitted. Data Source: Historic Planning Application Data Type: Point

Type of Site: Waste Further Details: Scheme comprises temporary change Transfer Station of use for a three year year period for an End of life Site Address: Planning Application vehicle (ELV) depot. An application (ref: Quartermaster Reference: W/10/01161/WCM) for detailed planning permission 385921 Road, West Wilts 2 279.0 SW W/10/01161/WCM was granted by Wiltshire U.A A detailed planning 152703 Trading Estate, Date: 15/11/2010 application has been granted. Heywood, Data Source: Historic Planning Application WESTBURY, Data Type: Point Wiltshire, BA13 4JT

2.2.2 Records of Environment Agency licensed waste sites within 1500m of the study site:

20

The following waste treatment, transfer or disposal sites records are represented as points on the Landfill and Other Waste Sites map:

Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m)

Site Address: Universal Salvage Auction Centre, Quartermaster Road, West Wilts Issue Date: 20/12/2000 Trading Estate, Westbury, Wiltshire, BA13 Effective Date: 15/04/2008 4JA Modified: - Type: Metal Recycling Site (Vehicle Surrendered Date: - Dismantler) 385900 Expiry Date: - 10A 323.0 SW Size: < 25000 tonnes 152700 Cancelled Date: - Environmental Permitting Regulations Status: Transferred (Waste) Licence Number: USE008 Site Name: Copart U K EPR reference: - Correspondence Address: -, Acrey Fields, Operator: Userve Ltd Woburn Road, Wootton, Beds, MK43 9EJ Waste Management licence No: 26023 Annual Tonnage: 25000.0

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 18 Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m)

Site Address: Universal Salvage Auction Centre, Quartermaster Road, West Wilts Trading Estate, Westbury, Wiltshire, BA13 Issue Date: 20/12/2000 4JA Effective Date: 15/04/2008 Type: Metal Recycling Site (Vehicle Modified: - Dismantler) Surrendered Date: - 385900 11A 323.0 SW Size: < 25000 tonnes Expiry Date: - 152700 Environmental Permitting Regulations Cancelled Date: - (Waste) Licence Number: USE008 Status: Transferred EPR reference: EA/EPR/EP3393FF/T001 Site Name: Copart U K Operator: Copart U K Ltd Correspondence Address: -, - Waste Management licence No: 26023 Annual Tonnage: 25000.0 Site Address: Universal Salvage Auction Centre, Quartermaster Road, West Wilts Issue Date: 20/12/2000 Trading Estate, Westbury, Wiltshire, BA13 Effective Date: - 4JA Modified: - Type: Metal Recycling Site (Vehicle Surrendered Date: - Dismantler) Expiry Date: - 385900 12A 323.0 SW Size: Unknown Cancelled Date: - 152700 Environmental Permitting Regulations Status: Issued (Waste) Licence Number: UNI260 Site Name: - EPR reference: - Correspondence Address: -, Acrey Fields, Operator: Universal Salvage Plc Woburn Road, Wooton, Bedfordshire, MK43 Waste Management licence No: 26023 9EJ Annual Tonnage: 25000.0 Site Address: Universal Salvage Auction Centre, Quartermaster Road, West Wilts Issue Date: 20/12/2000 Trading Estate, Westbury, Wiltshire, BA13 Effective Date: - 4JA Modified: - Type: Metal Recycling Site (Vehicle Surrendered Date: - Dismantler) Expiry Date: - 385900 13A 323.0 SW Size: >= 25000 tonnes < 75000 tonnes Cancelled Date: - 152700 Environmental Permitting Regulations Status: Issued (Waste) Licence Number: UNI260 Site Name: - EPR reference: - Correspondence Address: -, Acrey Fields, Operator: Universal Salvage Plc Woburn Road, Wooton, Bedfordshire, MK43 Waste Management licence No: 26023 9EJ Annual Tonnage: 25000.0 Site Address: Universal Salvage Auction Centre, Quartermaster Road, West Wilts Issue Date: 20/12/2000 Trading Estate, Westbury, Wiltshire, BA13 Effective Date: - 4JA Modified: - Type: Metal Recycling Site (Vehicle Surrendered Date: - Dismantler) Expiry Date: - 385900 14A 323.0 SW Size: < 25000 tonnes Cancelled Date: - 152700 Environmental Permitting Regulations Status: Issued (Waste) Licence Number: UNI260 Site Name: - EPR reference: - Correspondence Address: -, Acrey Fields, Operator: Universal Salvage Plc Woburn Road, Wooton, Bedfordshire, MK43 Waste Management licence No: 26023 9EJ Annual Tonnage: 25000.0 Site Address: Headquaters Road, West Wilts Trading Estate, Westbury, Wiltshire, BA13 Issue Date: 21/07/2010 4JR Effective Date: - Type: Vehicle depollution facility Modified: - Size: < 25000 tonnes Surrendered Date: 09/10/2013 385700 Environmental Permitting Regulations 15 475.0 W Expiry Date: - 153000 (Waste) Licence Number: DEV093 Cancelled Date: - EPR reference: EA/EPR/GP3398SC/S002 Status: Surrendered Operator: Devizes Reclamation Company Site Name: Headquaters Road Ltd Correspondence Address: -, - Waste Management licence No: 101511 Annual Tonnage: 0.0

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 19 Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m)

Site Address: "21 Broadway North,", 21, Broadway North, West Wilts Trading Estate, Issue Date: 15/04/1994 Westbury, Wiltshire, BA13 4JX Effective Date: - Type: Metal Recycling Site (mixed MRS's) Modified: 17/04/1997 Size: < 25000 tonnes Surrendered Date: - 385400 16B 790.0 W Environmental Permitting Regulations Expiry Date: - 153100 (Waste) Licence Number: WES005 Cancelled Date: - EPR reference: UP3090FE/A001 Status: Issued Operator: Regler T J Site Name: 21 Broadway North Scrap Yard Waste Management licence No: 27003 Correspondence Address: -, - Annual Tonnage: 74999.0 Site Address: 21 Broadway North,, 21, Broadway North, West Wilts Trading Estate, Issue Date: 15/04/1994 Westbury, Wiltshire, BA13 4JX Effective Date: 23/06/2011 Type: Metal Recycling Site (mixed MRS's) Modified: 17/04/1997 Size: < 25000 tonnes Surrendered Date: - 385400 Environmental Permitting Regulations Expiry Date: - 17B 790.0 W 153100 (Waste) Licence Number: EJS004 Cancelled Date: - EPR reference: EA/EPR/ZP3196ET/T001 Status: Transferred Operator: E J Shanley And Son ( Trowbridge) Site Name: Westbury Wilts Car And Ltd Commercial Breakers Waste Management licence No: 27003 Correspondence Address: -, - Annual Tonnage: 74999.0 Site Address: 145/146, Engineer Road, West Wilts Trading Estate, Westbury, Wiltshire, Issue Date: 13/09/2005 BS13 4JW Effective Date: - Type: Physical Treatment Facility Modified: - Size: < 25000 tonnes Surrendered Date: 20/08/2010 Not 385280 Environmental Permitting Regulations 884.0 W Expiry Date: - shown 152950 (Waste) Licence Number: B&G001 Cancelled Date: - EPR reference: EA/EPR/DP3393FH/S002 Status: Surrendered Operator: Robert James Sibley & Gary Site Name: 145/146 Engineer Road Robert Sibley Correspondence Address: -, - Waste Management licence No: 26086 Annual Tonnage: 0.0 Site Address: Northacre Resource Recovery Issue Date: 07/08/2009 Centre, Stephenson Road, Westbury, Effective Date: - Wiltshire, BA13 4WD Modified: - Type: Biological Treatment Facility Surrendered Date: - Size: < 25000 tonnes Not 385828 Expiry Date: - 889.0 SW Environmental Permitting Regulations shown 151891 Cancelled Date: - (Waste) Licence Number: HIL028 Status: Issued EPR reference: EA/EPR/LP3491EE/A001 Site Name: Northacre Resource Recovery Operator: Hills Waste Solutions Ltd Centre Waste Management licence No: 100221 Correspondence Address: -, - Annual Tonnage: 75000.0 Site Address: 21, Broadway North, West Wilts Trading Estate, Westbury, Wiltshire, Issue Date: 21/07/2011 BA13 4JX Effective Date: - Type: Vehicle depollution facility Modified: - Size: < 25000 tonnes Surrendered Date: - Not 385237 955.0 W Environmental Permitting Regulations Expiry Date: - shown 153129 (Waste) Licence Number: TMC005 Cancelled Date: - EPR reference: EA/EPR/ZP3998VJ/A001 Status: Issued Operator: Talbot Motor Company Ltd Site Name: 21 Broadway North Waste Management licence No: 102948 Correspondence Address: -, - Annual Tonnage: 74999.0 Site Address: Chemical Road, West Wilts Issue Date: 10/11/1988 Trading Estate, Westbury, Wiltshire Effective Date: - Type: Physical Treatment Facility Modified: - Size: < 25000 tonnes Surrendered Date: - Not 385200 Environmental Permitting Regulations 962.0 W Expiry Date: - shown 152900 (Waste) Licence Number: PRE053 Cancelled Date: - EPR reference: EA/EPR/AP3190FY/A001 Status: Revoked Operator: Premiere Environmental Ltd Site Name: Chemical Road Processing Plant Waste Management licence No: 27147 Correspondence Address: -, - Annual Tonnage: 50000.0

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 20 Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m)

Site Address: Unit 169 Chemical Rd, Unit 169, Chemical Road, West Wilt Tarding Issue Date: 12/11/1998 Estate, Westbury, Wiltshire, BA13 4JL Effective Date: - Type: Household, Commercial & Industrial Modified: - Waste T Stn Surrendered Date: - Not 385200 Size: < 25000 tonnes Expiry Date: - 962.0 W shown 152900 Environmental Permitting Regulations Cancelled Date: - (Waste) Licence Number: WES100 Status: Issued EPR reference: EA/EPR/GP3799FT/A001 Site Name: Unit 169 Chemical Rd Transfer Operator: Western Skip Hire Ltd Station Waste Management licence No: 27285 Correspondence Address: -, - Annual Tonnage: 24999.0 Site Address: 170- 171, Chemical Road, West Wilts Trading Estate, Westbury, Wiltshire, BA13 4JN Issue Date: 15/09/2004 Type: Household, Commercial & Industrial Effective Date: - Waste T Stn Modified: - Size: < 25000 tonnes Surrendered Date: - Not 385200 966.0 W Environmental Permitting Regulations Expiry Date: - shown 152980 (Waste) Licence Number: CAL001 Cancelled Date: - EPR reference: EA/EPR/RP3093FA/A001 Status: Issued Operator: Stephen Richard Wordley & Site Name: 1st Call Skips Stephen Woodrow Wordley Correspondence Address: -, - Waste Management licence No: 26074 Annual Tonnage: 4999.0 Site Address: Chemical Road,, West Wilts Issue Date: 05/06/1989 Trading Estate, Westbury, Wiltshire, BA13 Effective Date: - 4JN Modified: - Type: Physico-Chemical Treatment Facility Surrendered Date: - Size: < 25000 tonnes Not 385200 Expiry Date: - 966.0 W Environmental Permitting Regulations shown 152800 Cancelled Date: - (Waste) Licence Number: PEN055 Status: Revoked EPR reference: EA/EPR/GP3090FB/A001 Site Name: Chemical Road Waste Operator: Premiere Environmental Ltd Transfer/treatment Facility Waste Management licence No: 27023 Correspondence Address: -, - Annual Tonnage: 50000.0 Site Address: Brook Lane, Brook Lane, Issue Date: 11/07/1996 Westbury, Wiltshire, BA13 4EN Effective Date: - Type: Special Waste Transfer Station Modified: - Size: < 25000 tonnes Surrendered Date: - Environmental Permitting Regulations Expiry Date: - Not 385600 1259.0 SW (Waste) Licence Number: WES080 Cancelled Date: - shown 151600 EPR reference: - Status: Issued Operator: Western Solvents Ltd & Waste Site Name: Brook Lane Waste Transfer Matters Ltd Station Waste Management licence No: 27019 Correspondence Address: Brook Lane, Annual Tonnage: 5000.0 Brook Lane, Westbury, Wilshire, BA13 4EN Site Address: Brook Lane, Brook Lane, Issue Date: 11/07/1996 Westbury, Wiltshire, BA13 4EN Effective Date: - Type: Special Waste Transfer Station Modified: - Size: < 25000 tonnes Surrendered Date: - Not 385600 Environmental Permitting Regulations Expiry Date: - 1259.0 SW shown 151600 (Waste) Licence Number: WES080 Cancelled Date: - EPR reference: EA/EPR/XP3690FX/A001 Status: Modified Operator: Waste Matters Ltd Site Name: Brook Lane Waste Transfer Waste Management licence No: 27019 Station Annual Tonnage: 5000.0 Correspondence Address: -, - Site Address: White Horse Country Park, Coach Road, Westbury, Wilts, BA13 4LX Issue Date: 30/01/2012 Type: Use of waste in construction <100,000 Effective Date: - tps Modified: - Size: < 25000 tonnes Surrendered Date: - Not 387808 1309.0 E Environmental Permitting Regulations Expiry Date: - shown 152410 (Waste) Licence Number: WHC002 Cancelled Date: - EPR reference: EA/EPR/DB3330DV/A001 Status: Issued Operator: White Horse Country Club Ltd Site Name: White Horse Country Park Waste Management licence No: 103585 Correspondence Address: -, - Annual Tonnage: 99999.0

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 21 Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m)

Site Address: Westbury Landfill, Trowbridge Issue Date: 31/07/1987 Road, Westbury, WILTS, BA13 4LX Effective Date: - Type: Household, Commercial & Industrial Modified: - Waste Landfill Surrendered Date: - Size: >= 75000 tonnes Expiry Date: - Not 388000 1461.0 E Environmental Permitting Regulations Cancelled Date: - shown 152800 (Waste) Licence Number: HAU563 Status: Issued EPR reference: - Site Name: Westbury Landfill Operator: Viridor Waste Disposal Ltd Correspondence Address: Haul Waste Waste Management licence No: 27129 Disposal Ltd, Great Western House, Station Annual Tonnage: 0.0 Approach, Taunton, Somerset, TA1 1QW Site Address: Westbury Landfill, Trowbridge Road, Westbury, Wiltshire, BA13 4LX Issue Date: 31/07/1987 Type: Household, Commercial & Industrial Effective Date: - Waste Landfill Modified: - Size: < 25000 tonnes Surrendered Date: - Not 388000 1461.0 E Environmental Permitting Regulations Expiry Date: - shown 152800 (Waste) Licence Number: HAU563 Cancelled Date: - EPR reference: EA/EPR/WP3090FW/A001 Status: Closure Operator: Viridor Waste Disposal Ltd Site Name: Westbury Landfill Waste Management licence No: 27129 Correspondence Address: -, - Annual Tonnage: 320664.0

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 22 3. Current Land Use Map

NW N NE

W E

SW S SE Current Land Use Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 23 3. Current Land Uses

3.1 Current Industrial Data

Records of potentially contaminative industrial sites within 250m of the study site: 22

The following records are represented as points on the Current Land Uses map.

Distance ID Direction Company NGR Address Activity Category (m)

Electricity 386382 1 41.0 N BA13 Electrical Features Infrastructure and Facilities Poles 153134 Unit 13-15 Brunel Centre, Tom's 386158 Cory Way, West Wilts Personal, Consumer and Other 2 66.0 NW Vehicle Cleaning Services Valeting 153003 Trading Estate, Westbury, Services BA13 4QT Cory Way, West Wilts 386101 3A 68.0 NW S P C UK Trading Estate, Westbury, Rubber, Silicones and Plastics Industrial Products 152920 BA13 4QT Aston 386101 Brook Lane, Westbury, 4A 68.0 NW Vehicle Auctions Motoring Barclay Ltd 152920 BA13 4EN Electricity 386219 5C 68.0 NW BA13 Electrical Features Infrastructure and Facilities Sub Station 153072 Unit 8 Brunel Centre, Cory Markhams 386166 Way, West Wilts Trading Vehicle Repair, Testing and 6B 80.0 NW Windscreen Repair and Servicing 153037 Estate, Westbury, BA13 Servicing s 4QT Unit 8 Brunel Centre, Cory White 386166 Way, West Wilts Trading Vehicle Repair, Testing and 7B 80.0 NW Horse Repair and Servicing 153037 Estate, Westbury, BA13 Servicing Windsreens 4QT Unit 8 Brunel Centre, Cory White 386166 Way, West Wilts Trading Industrial Coatings and 8B 80.0 NW Horse Auto Industrial Products 153037 Estate, Westbury, BA13 Finishings Styling 4QT Unit 6-7 Brunel Centre, Mobility 386167 Cory Way, West Wilts Disability and Mobility 9B 85.0 NW Consumer Products Works Ltd 153044 Trading Estate, Westbury, Equipment BA13 4QT Unit 6 Commerce Business Harvey 386213 Centre, Commerce Close, Vehicle Repair, Testing and 10C 90.0 NW Repair and Servicing Auto-tech 153096 West Wilts Trading Estate, Servicing Westbury, BA13 4LS Unit 4 Commerce Business M P D 386212 Centre, Commerce Close, 11D 116.0 NW Exhibitions General Construction Supplies Industrial Products 153128 West Wilts Trading Estate, Ltd Westbury, BA13 4LS Unit 4 Commerce Business Think 386212 Centre, Commerce Close, Hobby, Sports and Pastime 12D 116.0 NW Consumer Products Equestrian 153128 West Wilts Trading Estate, Products Westbury, BA13 4LS Unit 1-3 Brunel Centre, Southern 386139 Cory Way, West Wilts 13 121.0 NW Precision Precision Engineers Engineering Services 153067 Trading Estate, Westbury, Ltd BA13 4QT

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 24 Distance ID Direction Company NGR Address Activity Category (m)

Unit 1-2 Commerce Klaw Business Centre, 386191 14E 156.0 NW Products Commerce Close, West General Construction Supplies Industrial Products 153162 Ltd Wilts Trading Estate, Westbury, BA13 4LS 386370 2, Paxmans Road, Clothing, Components and 15 163.0 S Roz Co Consumer Products 152401 Westbury, BA13 4HS Accessories Tes Link Road, West Wilts 386148 16 174.0 NW Transmissio Trading Estate, Westbury, Vehicle Components Industrial Products 153151 ns Ltd BA13 4JB 386261 17 182.0 NW Tank BA13 Tanks (Generic) Industrial Features 153244 John Link Road, West Wilts Satchell 386206 Vehicle Repair, Testing and 18 191.0 NW Trading Estate, Westbury, Repair and Servicing Motor 153218 Servicing BA13 4JB Services Electricity 385959 19 208.0 W BA13 Electrical Features Infrastructure and Facilities Sub Station 152937 49, Cory Way, West Wilts W H Kemp 386064 20 212.0 NW Trading Estate, Westbury, Cable, Wire and Fibre Optics Industrial Products Electrics Ltd 153121 BA13 4QT Electricity 386244 21 217.0 SW BA13 Electrical Features Infrastructure and Facilities Sub Station 152425 386210 22 220.0 NW Depot BA13 Container and Storage Transport, Storage and Delivery 153256

3.2 Petrol and Fuel Sites

Records of petrol or fuel sites within 500m of the study site: 1

The following petrol or fuel site records provided by Catalist are represented as points on the Current Land Use map:

Distance ID Direction NGR Company Address LPG Status (m)

Rygor Used Commercials, 26B, Link Road, Link Road, 386165 23E 170.0 NW Obsolete West Wiltshire Trading Not Applicable Obsolete 153159 Estate, Westbury, Wiltshire, BA13 4JB

3.3 Underground High Pressure Oil and Gas Pipelines

Records of high pressure underground pipelines within 500m of the study site: 0

Database searched and no data found.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 25 4. Geology

4.1 Artificial Ground and Made Ground

Database searched and no data found.

The database has been searched on site, including a 50m buffer.

4.2 Superficial Ground and Drift Geology

Database searched and no data found. The database has been searched on site, including a 50m buffer.

4.3 Bedrock and Solid Geology

The database has been searched on site, including a 50m buffer.

Lex Code Description Rock Type

OXC-MDST OXFORD CLAY FORMATION MUDSTONE TOF-LMST TODBER FREESTONE MEMBER LIMESTONE HYB-SDST HAZELBURY BRYAN FORMATION SANDSTONE HYB-SDST HAZELBURY BRYAN FORMATION SANDSTONE

(Derived from the BGS 1:50,000 Digital Geological Map of Great Britain)

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 26 5. Hydrogeology and Hydrology 5a. Aquifer Within Superficial Geology

NW N NE

W E

SW S SE Map Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 27 5b. Aquifer Within Bedrock Geology and Abstraction Licenses

NW N NE

W E

SW S SE Map Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 28 5c. Hydrogeology – Source Protection Zones and Potable Water Abstraction Licenses

NW N NE

W E

SW S SE Map Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 29 5d. Hydrology – Detailed River Network and River Quality

NW N NE

W E

SW S SE Map Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 30 5. Hydrogeology and Hydrology

5.1 Aquifer within Superficial Deposits

Are there records of strata classification within the superficial geology at or in proximity to the property? Yes

From 1 April 2010, the Environment Agency's Groundwater Protection Policy has been using aquifer designations consistent with the Water Framework Directive. For further details on the designation and interpretation of this information, please refer to the GroundSure Enviroinsight User Guide.

The following aquifer records are shown on the Aquifer within Superficial Geology Map (5a):

Distance ID Direction Designation Description (m)

Permeable layers capable of supporting water supplies at a local rather than 1 75.0 NE Secondary A strategic scale, and in some cases forming an important source of base flow to rivers. These are generally aquifers formerly classified as minor aquifers

Assigned where it is not possible to attribute either category A or B to a rock type. 2 346.0 W Secondary (undifferentiated) In general these layers have previously been designated as both minor and non- aquifer in different locations due to the variable characteristics of the rock type

5.2 Aquifer within Bedrock Deposits

Are there records of strata classification within the bedrock geology at or in proximity to the property? Yes

From 1 April 2010, the Environment Agency's Groundwater Protection Policy has been using aquifer designations consistent with the Water Framework Directive. For further details on the designation and interpretation of this information, please refer to the GroundSure Enviroinsight User Guide.

The following aquifer records are shown on the Aquifer within Bedrock Geology Map (5b):

Distance ID Direction Designation Description (m)

Permeable layers capable of supporting water supplies at a local rather than strategic scale, and 1 0.0 On Site Secondary A in some cases forming an important source of base flow to rivers. These are generally aquifers formerly classified as minor aquifers These are rock layers or drift deposits with low permeability that have negligible significance for 5 0.0 On Site Unproductive water supply or river base flow Permeable layers capable of supporting water supplies at a local rather than strategic scale, and 2 439.0 SE Secondary A in some cases forming an important source of base flow to rivers. These are generally aquifers formerly classified as minor aquifers

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 31 5.3 Groundwater Abstraction Licences

Are there any Groundwater Abstraction Licences within 2000m of the study site? No

Database searched and no data found.

5.4 Surface Water Abstraction Licences

Are there any Surface Water Abstraction Licences within 2000m of the study site? Yes

The following Surface Water Abstraction Licences records are represented as points, lines and regions on the Aquifer within Bedrock Geology Map (5b):

Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m)

Annual Volume (m³): 116052 Max Daily Volume (m³): 707.2 Licence No: 17/53/010/S/057 Application No: N 171 Details: Lake & Pond Throughflow Not 386430 Original Start Date: 20/12/2000 1847.0 N Direct Source: Surface Water - Fresh shown 154940 Expiry Date: - Point: Biss At Hawkeridge Link Road Issue No: 101 Data Type: Point Version Start Date: 20/12/2000 Version End Date:

5.5 Potable Water Abstraction Licences

Are there any Potable Water Abstraction Licences within 2000m of the study site? No

Database searched and no data found.

5.6 Source Protection Zones

Are there any Source Protection Zones within 500m of the study site? No

Database searched and no data found.

5.7 River Quality

Is there any Environment Agency information on river quality within 1500m of the study site? Yes

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 32 5.7.1 Biological Quality:

Biological Quality data describes water quality in terms of 83 groups of macroinvertebrates, some of which are pollution sensitive. The results are graded from A ('Very Good') to F ('Bad').

The following Biological Quality records are shown on the Hydrology Map (5d):

Biological Quality Grade Distance ID Direction NGR River Quality Grade (m) 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

River Name: Bitham Brook 387000 38 804.0 NE Reach: Norleaze-conf With Biss CBBBB 153600 End/Start of Stretch: Start of Stretch NGR River Name: Biss Brook (dup) Not 385000 Reach: Westbury Trading Estate-conf With 1167.0 W CBBBB shown 153000 Bit Bk End/Start of Stretch: Start of Stretch NGR River Name: Biss Bk Not 385000 1167.0 W Reach: Penknap-westbury Trading Estate BBBBB shown 153000 End/Start of Stretch: End of Stretch NGR

5.7.2 Chemical Quality:

Chemical quality data is based on the General Quality Assessment Headline Indicators scheme (GQAHI). In England, each chemical sample is measured for ammonia and dissolved oxygen. In Wales, the samples are measured for biological oxygen demand (BOD), ammonia and dissolved oxygen. The results are graded from A ('Very Good') to F ('Bad').

The following Chemical Quality records are shown on the Hydrology Map (5d):

Chemical Quality Grade

Distance ID Direction NGR River Quality Grade 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 (m)

River Name: Biss Bk Not 385000 1167.0 W Reach: Penknap-westbury Trading Estate AAAAA shown 153000 End/Start of Stretch: End of Stretch NGR

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 33 5.8 Detailed River Network

Are there any Detailed River Network entries within 500m of the study site? Yes

The following Detailed River Network records are represented on the Hydrology Map (5d):

ID Distance (m) Direction Details

River Name: - River Type: Secondary River 1 382.0 NE Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: - River Type: Culvert 2 447.0 NE Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: Bitham Brook River Type: Primary River 3 475.0 NE Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: - River Type: Secondary River 4 495.0 NE Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: -

5.9 Surface Water Features

Are there any surface water features within 250m of the study site? Yes

The following surface water records are not represented on mapping:

Distance (m) Direction

87.0 SE 122.0 S 165.0 N 250.0 SE

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 34 6. Environment Agency Flood Map for planning (from rivers and the sea)

NW N NE

W E

SW S SE Map Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 35 6. Flooding

6.1 Zone 2 Flooding

Environment Agency Zone 2 floodplains estimate the annual probability of flooding as between 1 in 1000 (0.1%) and 1 in 100 (1%) from rivers and between 1 in 1000 (0.1%) and 1 in 200 (0.5%) from the sea. Any relevant data is represented on Map 1 – Environment Agency Flood Map for Planning:

Is the site within 250m of an Environment Agency Zone 2 floodplain? No

Database searched and no data found.

6.2 Zone 3 Flooding

Zone 3 shows the extent of a river flood with a 1 in 100 (1%) or greater chance of occurring in any year or a sea flood with a 1 in 200 (0.5%) or greater chance of occurring in any year. Any relevant data is represented on Map 1 – Environment Agency Flood Map for Planning.

Is the site within 250m of an Environment Agency Zone 3 floodplain? No

Database searched and no data found.

6.3 Flood Defences

Are there any Flood Defences within 250m of the study site? No

Database searched and no data found.

6.4 Areas benefiting from Flood Defences

Are there any areas benefiting from Flood Defences within 250m of the study site? No

6.5 Areas benefiting from Flood Storage

Are there any areas used for Flood Storage within 250m of the study site? No

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 36 6.6 Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Areas

6.6.1 Are there any British Geological Survey groundwater flooding susceptibility areas within 50m of the boundary of the study site?

Yes

Does this relate to Clearwater Flooding or Superficial Deposits Flooding? Clearwater Flooding

Notes: Groundwater flooding may either be associated with shallow unconsolidated sedimentary aquifers which overlie unproductive aquifers (Superficial Deposits Flooding), or with unconfined aquifers (Clearwater Flooding).

6.6.2 What is the highest susceptibility to groundwater flooding in the search area based on the underlying geological conditions?

Very Low

6.7 Groundwater Flooding Confidence Areas

What is the British Geological Survey confidence rating in this result? High

Notes: Groundwater flooding is defined as the emergence of groundwater at the ground surface or the rising of groundwater into man-made ground under conditions where the normal range of groundwater levels is exceeded.

The confidence rating is on a threefold scale - Low, Moderate and High. This provides a relative indication of the BGS confidence in the accuracy of the susceptibility result for groundwater flooding. This is based on the amount and precision of the information used in the assessment. In areas with a relatively lower level of confidence the susceptibility result should be treated with more caution. In other areas with higher levels of confidence the susceptibility result can be used with more confidence.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 37 7. Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Map

NW N NE

W E

SW S SE Map Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 38 7. Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites

Presence of Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites within 2000m of the study site? No

7.1 Records of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) within 2000m of the study site:

2

The following Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) records provided by Natural England/Countryside Council for Wales and Scottish Natural Heritage are represented as polygons on the Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Map:

Distance ID Direction SSSI Name Data Source (m)

1 1109.0 NE Picket and Clanger Wood Natural England Not 1911.0 SW Westbury Ironstone Quarry Natural England shown

7.2 Records of National Nature Reserves (NNR) within 2000m of the study site:

0

Database searched and no data found.

7.3 Records of Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) within 2000m of the study site:

0

Database searched and no data found.

7.4 Records of Special Protection Areas (SPA) within 2000m of the study site:

0

Database searched and no data found.

7.5 Records of Ramsar sites within 2000m of the study site:

0

Database searched and no data found.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 39 7.6 Records of Ancient Woodland within 2000m of the study site:

13

The following Ancient Woodland records are supplied by English Nature/Scottish Natural Heritage/Countryside Council for Wales and are represented as polygons on the Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Map:

Distance ID Direction Ancient Woodland Name Data Source (m)

4 956.0 NE PICKET/CLANGER/ROUND WOOD Ancient and Semi-Natural Woodland 5 1092.0 NE PICKET/CLANGER/ROUND WOOD Ancient and Semi-Natural Woodland 6 1309.0 NE PICKET/CLANGER/ROUND WOOD Ancient Replanted Woodland Not 1360.0 NE PICKET/CLANGER/ROUND WOOD Ancient Replanted Woodland shown 8 1674.0 NE PICKET/CLANGER/ROUND WOOD Ancient Replanted Woodland Not 1680.0 NE PICKET/CLANGER/ROUND WOOD Ancient Replanted Woodland shown 10 1751.0 NE PICKET/CLANGER/ROUND WOOD Ancient Replanted Woodland Not 1784.0 NE PICKET/CLANGER/ROUND WOOD Ancient Replanted Woodland shown Not 1859.0 NE PICKET/CLANGER/ROUND WOOD Ancient Replanted Woodland shown Not 1923.0 NE PICKET/CLANGER/ROUND WOOD Ancient Replanted Woodland shown Not 1972.0 W HIGH WOOD/HAZEL WOOD Ancient and Semi-Natural Woodland shown Not 1986.0 W ROUND WOOD Ancient and Semi-Natural Woodland shown Not 1992.0 NE KETTLE LANE WOOD Ancient and Semi-Natural Woodland shown

7.7 Records of Local Nature Reserves (LNR) within 2000m of the study site:

0

Database searched and no data found.

7.8 Records of World Heritage Sites within 2000m of the study site:

0

Database searched and no data found.

7.9 Records of Environmentally Sensitive Areas within 2000m of the study site:

0

Database searched and no data found.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 40 7.10 Records of Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) within 2000m of the study site:

0

Database searched and no data found.

7.11 Records of National Parks (NP) within 2000m of the study site:

0

Database searched and no data found.

7.12 Records of Nitrate Sensitive Areas within 2000m of the study site:

0

Database searched and no data found.

7.13 Records of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones within 2000m of the study site:

1

The following Nitrate Vulnerable Zone records produced by DEFRA are represented as polygons on the Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Map:

Distance ID Direction NVZ Name Data Source (m)

3 1766.0 SE NVZ Area DEFRA

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 41 8. Natural Hazards Findings

8.1 Detailed BGS GeoSure Data

BGS GeoSure Data has been searched to 50m. The data is included in tabular format. If you require further information on geology and ground stability, please obtain a GroundSure GeoInsight, available from our website. The following information has been found:

8.1.1 Shrink Swell

What is the maximum Shrink-Swell** hazard rating identified on the study site? Moderate

The following natural subsidence information provided by the British Geological Survey is not represented on mapping:

Hazard

Ground conditions predominantly high plasticity. Do not plant or remove trees or shrubs near to buildings without expert advice about their effect and management. For new build, consideration should be given to advice published by the National House Building Council (NHBC) and the Building Research Establishment (BRE). There is a probable increase in construction cost to reduce potential shrink-swell problems. For existing property, there is a probable increase in insurance risk during droughts or where vegetation with high moisture demands is present.

8.1.2 Landslides

What is the maximum Landslide* hazard rating identified on the study site? Very Low

The following natural subsidence information provided by the British Geological Survey is not represented on mapping:

Hazard

Slope instability problems are unlikely to be present. No special actions required to avoid problems due to landslides. No special ground investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with landslides.

8.1.3 Soluble Rocks

What is the maximum Soluble Rocks* hazard rating identified on the study site? Null - Negligible

Soluble rocks are not present in the search area. No special actions required to avoid problems due to soluble rocks. No special ground investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with soluble rocks.

* This indicates an automatically generated 50m buffer and site.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 42 8.1.4 Compressible Ground

What is the maximum Compressible Ground* hazard rating identified on the study site? Negligible

The following natural subsidence information provided by the British Geological Survey is not represented on mapping:

Hazard

No indicators for compressible deposits identified. No special actions required to avoid problems due to compressible deposits. No special ground investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with compressible deposits.

8.1.5 Collapsible Rocks

What is the maximum Collapsible Rocks* hazard rating identified on the study site? Very Low

The following natural subsidence information provided by the British Geological Survey is not represented on mapping:

Hazard

Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are unlikely to be present. No special ground investigation required or increased construction costs or increased financial risk due to potential problems with collapsible deposits.

8.1.6 Running Sand

What is the maximum Running Sand** hazard rating identified on the study site? Negligible

The following natural subsidence information provided by the British Geological Survey is not represented on mapping:

Hazard

No indicators for running sand identified. No special actions required to avoid problems due to running sand. No special ground investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with running sand.

* This indicates an automatically generated 50m buffer and site.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 43 9. Mining

9.1 Coal Mining

Are there any coal mining areas within 75m of the study site? No

Database searched and no data found.

9.2 Shallow Mining

What is the subsidence hazard relating to shallow mining on-site*? Negligible

*Please note this data is searched with a 150m buffer.

9.3 Brine Affected Areas

Are there any brine affected areas within 75m of the study site? No

Guidance: No Guidance Required.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 44 Contact Details EmapSite Telephone: 0118 9736883 [email protected]

British Geological Survey Enquiries

Kingsley Dunham Centre Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG Tel: 0115 936 3143. Fax: 0115 936 3276. Email: [email protected] Web:www.bgs.ac.uk BGS Geological Hazards Reports and general geological enquiries

Environment Agency

National Customer Contact Centre, PO Box 544 Rotherham, S60 1BY Tel: 08708 506 506 Web:www.environment-agency.gov.uk Email:[email protected]

Public Health England

Public information access office Public Health England, Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8UG https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/public-health- england Email:[email protected] Main switchboard: 020 7654 8000

The Coal Authority

200 Lichfield Lane Mansfield Notts NG18 4RG Tel: 0845 762 6848 DX 716176 Mansfield 5 www.coal.gov.uk

Ordnance Survey

Adanac Drive, Southampton SO16 0AS Tel: 08456 050505

Local Authority Authority: Wiltshire Phone: 0300 456 0100 Web: http://www.wiltshire.gov.uk/index.htm Address: County Hall, Bythesea Road, Trowbridge, Wiltshire, BA14 8JN

Gemapping PLC

Virginia Villas, High Street, Hartley Witney, Hampshire RG27 8NW Tel: 01252 845444 Acknowledgements: Site of Special Scientific Interest, National Nature Reserve, Ramsar Site, Special Protection Area, Special Area of Conservation data is provided by, and used with the permission of, English Nature who retain the Copyright and Intellectual Property Rights for the data. PointX © Database Right/Copyright, Thomson Directories Limited © Copyright Link Interchange Network Limited © Database Right/Copyright and Ordnance Survey © Crown Copyright and/or Database Right. All Rights Reserved. Licence Number [03421028]. This report has been prepared in accordance with the GroundSure Ltd standard Terms and Conditions of business for work of this nature.

Report Reference: EMS-239947_320585 Client Reference: EMS_239947_320585 45 implied by custom, practice or course of dealing shall be of no effect, and that this Standard Terms and Conditions Contract shall prevail over all others in relation to the Order. 2.5 If the Client or Beneficiary requests insurance in conjunction with or as a result 1 Definitions of the Services, GroundSure shall use reasonable endeavours to recommend such insurance, but makes no warranty that such insurance shall be available from In these terms and conditions unless the context otherwise requires: insurers or that it will be offered on reasonable terms. Any insurance purchased by “Beneficiary” means the person or entity for whose benefit the Client has the Client or Beneficiary shall be subject solely to the terms of the policy issued by obtained the Services. insurers and GroundSure will have no liability therefor. In addition you “Client” means the party or parties entering into a Contract with GroundSure. acknowledge and agree that GroundSure does not act as an agent or broker for any insurance providers. The Client should take (and ensure that the Beneficiary takes) “Commercial” means any building or property which is not Residential. independent advice to ensure that the insurance policy requested or offered is “Confidential Information” means the contents of this Contract and all information suitable for its requirements. received from the Client as a result of, or in connection with, this Contract other 2.6 GroundSure's quotations or proposals are valid for a period of 30 days only than unless an alternative period of time is explicitly stipulated by GroundSure. (i) information which the Client can prove was rightfully in its GroundSure reserves the right to withdraw any quotation or proposal at any time possession prior to disclosure by GroundSure and before an Order is accepted by GroundSure. GroundSure's acceptance of an Order shall be binding only when made in writing and signed by GroundSure's authorised (ii) any information which is in the public domain (other than by representative or when accepted through the Order Website. virtue of a breach of this Contract). “Support Services” means Support Services provided by GroundSure including, 3 The Client’s obligations without limitation, interpreting third party and in-house environmental data, providing environmental support advice, undertaking environmental audits and 3.1The Client shall comply with the terms of this Contract and assessments, Site investigation, Site monitoring and related items. (i) procure that the Beneficiary or any third party relying on the “Contract” means the contract between GroundSure and the Client for the Services complies with and acts as if it is bound by the Contract and provision of the Services, and which shall incorporate these terms and conditions, (ii) be liable to GroundSure for the acts and omissions of the the Order, and the relevant User Guide. Beneficiary or any third party relying on the Services as if such acts and omissions “Third Party Data Provider” means any third party providing Third Party Content were those of the Client. to GroundSure. 3.2 The Client shall be solely responsible for ensuring that the Services are “Data Reports” means reports comprising factual data with no accompanying appropriate and suitable for its and/or the Beneficiary’s needs. interpretation. 3.3 The Client shall supply to GroundSure as soon as practicable and without charge “Fees” has the meaning set out in clause 5.1. all requisite information (and the Client warrants that such information is accurate, complete and appropriate), including without limitation any environmental “GroundSure” means GroundSure Limited, a company registered in England and information relating to the Site and shall give such assistance as GroundSure shall Wales under number 03421028. reasonably require in the provision of the Services including, without limitation, “GroundSure Materials” means all materials prepared by GroundSure and provided access to the Site, facilities and equipment. as part of the Services, including but not limited to Third Party Content, Data 3.4 Where the Client’s approval or decision is required to enable GroundSure to Reports, Mapping, and Risk Screening Reports. carry out work in order to provide the Services, such approval or decision shall be “Intellectual Property” means any patent, copyright, design rights, trade or service given or procured in reasonable time and so as not to delay or disrupt the mark, moral rights, data protection rights, know-how or trade mark in each case performance of the Services. whether registered or not and including applications for the same or any other 3.5 Save as expressly permitted by this Contract the Client shall not, and shall rights of a similar nature anywhere in the world. procure that the Beneficiary shall not, re-sell, alter, add to, or amend the “Mapping” means a map, map data or a combination of historical maps of various GroundSure Materials, or use the GroundSure Materials in a manner for which they ages, time periods and scales. were not intended. The Client may make the GroundSure Materials available to a third party who is considering acquiring some or all of, or providing funding in “Order” means an electronic, written or other order form submitted by the Client relation to, the Site, but such third party cannot rely on the same unless expressly requesting Services from GroundSure in respect of a specified Site. permitted under clause 4. “Ordnance Survey” means the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and 3.6 The Client is responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of its user name and Skills, acting through Ordnance Survey, Adanac Drive, Southampton, SO16 0AS, password if using the Order Website and the Client acknowledges that GroundSure UK. accepts no liability of any kind for any loss or damage suffered by the Client as a “Order Website” means the online platform through which Orders may be placed consequence of using the Order Website. by the Client and accepted by GroundSure. “Report” means a Risk Screening Report or Data Report for Commercial or 4 Reliance Residential property. 4.1The Client acknowledges that the Services provided by GroundSure consist of “Residential” means any building or property used as or intended to be used as a the presentation and analysis of Third Party Content and other content and that single dwelling. information obtained from a Third Party Data Provider cannot be guaranteed or warranted by GroundSure to be reliable. “Risk Screening Report” means a risk screening report comprising factual data with an accompanying interpretation by GroundSure. 4.2 In respect of Data Reports, Mapping and Risk Screening Reports, the following classes of person and no other are entitled to rely on their contents; “Services” means any Report, Mapping and/or Support Services which GroundSure has agreed to provide by accepting an Order pursuant to clause 2.6. (i) the Beneficiary, "Site" means the area of land in respect of which the Client has requested (ii) the Beneficiary's professional advisers, (iii) any person GroundSure to provide the Services. providing funding to the Beneficiary in relation to the Site (whether directly or as part of a lending syndicate), “Third Party Content” means data, database information or other information which is provided to GroundSure by a Third Party Data Provider. (iv) the first purchaser or first tenant of the Site, and "User Guide" means the user guide, as amended from time to time, available upon (v) the professional advisers and lenders of the first purchaser or request from GroundSure and on the website (www.GroundSure.com) and forming tenant of the Site. part of this Contract. 4.3 In respect of Support Services, only the Client, Beneficiary and parties expressly named in a Report and no other parties are entitled to rely on its contents. 2 Scope of Services, terms and conditions, requests for 4.4 Save as set out in clauses 4.2 and 4.3 and unless otherwise expressly agreed in insurance and quotations writing, no other person or entity of any kind is entitled to rely on any Services or Report issued or provided by GroundSure. Any party considering such Reports and 2.1 GroundSure agrees to provide the Services in accordance with the Contract. Services does so at their own risk. 2.2 GroundSure shall exercise reasonable skill and care in the provision of the Services. 5 Fees and Disbursements 2.3 Subject to clause 7.3 the Client acknowledges that it has not relied on any 5.1GroundSure shall charge and the Client shall pay fees at the rate and frequency statement or representation made by or on behalf of GroundSure which is not set specified in the written proposal, Order Website or Order acknowledgement form, out and expressly agreed in writing in the Contract and all such statements and plus (in the case of Support Services) all proper disbursements incurred by representations are hereby excluded to the fullest extent permitted by law. GroundSure. The Client shall in addition pay all value added tax or other tax payable 2.4 The Client acknowledges that terms and conditions appearing on a Client’s on such fees and disbursements in relation to the provision of the Services order form, printed stationery or other communication, or any terms or conditions (together “Fees”). 5.2 The Client shall pay all outstanding Fees to GroundSure in full without or personal injury resulting from negligence, or for any damage or liability incurred deduction, counterclaim or set off within 30 days of the date of GroundSure’s by the Client or Beneficiary as a result of fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation. invoice or such other period as may be agreed in writing between GroundSure and 7.4 GroundSure shall not be liable for the Client ("Payment Date"). Interest on late payments will accrue on a daily basis from the Payment Date until the date of payment (whether before or after (i) loss of profits; judgment) at the rate of 8% per annum. (ii) loss of business; 5.3 The Client shall be deemed to have agreed the amount of any invoice unless an (iii) depletion of goodwill and/or similar losses; objection is made in writing within 28 days of the date of the invoice. As soon as reasonably practicable after being notified of an objection, without prejudice to (iv) loss of anticipated savings; clause 5.2 a member of GroundSure’s management team will contact the Client and (v) loss of goods; the parties shall then use all reasonable endeavours to resolve the dispute within 15 days. (vi) loss of contract; (vii) loss of use; 6 Intellectual Property and Confidentiality (viii) loss or corruption of data or information; 6.1 Subject to (ix) business interruption; (i) full payment of all relevant Fees and (x) any kind of special, indirect, consequential or pure economic (ii) compliance with this Contract, the Client is granted (and is loss, costs, damages, charges or expenses; permitted to sub-licence to the Beneficiary) a royalty-free, worldwide, non- (xi) loss or damage that arise as a result of the use of all or part of assignable and (save to the extent set out in this Contract) non-transferable licence the GroundSure Materials in breach of the Contract; to make use of the GroundSure Materials. (xii) loss or damage arising as a result of any error, omission or 6.2 All Intellectual Property in the GroundSure Materials are and shall remain inaccuracy in any part of the GroundSure Materials where such error, omission or owned by GroundSure or GroundSure's licensors (including without limitation the inaccuracy is caused by any Third Party Content or any reasonable interpretation of Third Party Data Providers) the Client acknowledges, and shall procure Third Party Content; acknowledgement by the Beneficiary of, such ownership. Nothing in this Contract purports to transfer or assign any rights to the Client or the Beneficiary in respect (xiii) loss or damage to a computer, software, modem, telephone or of such Intellectual Property. other property; and 6.3 Third Party Data Providers may enforce any breach of clauses 6.1 and 6.2 (xiv) loss or damage caused by a delay or loss of use of against the Client or Beneficiary. GroundSure’s internet ordering service. 6.4 The Client shall, and shall procure that any recipients of the GroundSure 7.5 GroundSure’s total liability in relation to or under the Contract shall be limited Materials shall: to £10 million for any claim or claims. (i) not remove, suppress or modify any trade mark, copyright or 7.6 GroundSure shall procure that the Beneficiary shall be bound by limitations and other proprietary marking belonging to GroundSure or any third party from the exclusions of liability in favour of GroundSure which accord with those detailed in Services; clauses 7.4 and 7.5 (subject to clause 7.3) in respect of all claims which the Beneficiary may bring against GroundSure in relation to the Services or other (ii) use the information obtained as part of the Services in matters arising pursuant to the Contract. respect of the subject Site only, and shall not store or reuse any information obtained as part of the Services provided in respect of adjacent or nearby sites; 8 GroundSure’s right to suspend or terminate (iii) not create any product or report which is derived directly or indirectly from the Services (save that those acting in a professional capacity to the 8.1 If GroundSure reasonably believes that the Client or Beneficiary has not Beneficiary may provide advice based upon the Services); provided the information or assistance required to enable the proper provision of the Services, GroundSure shall be entitled to suspend all further performance of the (iv) not combine the Services with or incorporate such Services Services until such time as any such deficiency has been made good. into any other information data or service; 8.2 GroundSure shall be entitled to terminate the Contract immediately on written (v) not reformat or otherwise change (whether by modification, notice in the event that: addition or enhancement), the Services (save that those acting for the Beneficiary in a professional capacity shall not be in breach of this clause 6.4(v) where such (i) the Client fails to pay any sum due to GroundSure within 30 reformatting is in the normal course of providing advice based upon the Services); days of the Payment Date; or (vi) where a Report and/or Mapping contains material belonging (ii) the Client (being an individual) has a bankruptcy order made to Ordnance Survey, acknowledge and agree that such content is protected by against him or (being a company) shall enter into liquidation whether compulsory or Crown Copyright and shall not use such content for any purpose outside of voluntary or have an administration order made against it or if a receiver shall be receiving the Services; and appointed over the whole or any part of its property assets or undertaking or if the Client is struck off the Register of Companies or dissolved; or (vii) not copy in whole or in part by any means any map prints or run-on copies containing content belonging to Ordnance Survey (other than that (iii) the Client being a company is unable to pay its debts within contained within Ordnance Survey’s OS Street Map) without first being in the meaning of Section 123 of the Insolvency Act 1986 or being an individual possession of a valid Paper Map Copying Licence from Ordnance Survey, appears unable to pay his debts within the meaning of Section 268 of the Insolvency Act 1986 or if the Client shall enter into a composition or arrangement with the 6.5 Notwithstanding clause 6.4, the Client may make reasonable use of the Client’s creditors or shall suffer distress or execution to be levied on his goods; or GroundSure Materials in order to advise the Beneficiary in a professional capacity. However, GroundSure shall have no liability in respect of any advice, opinion or (iv) the Client or the Beneficiary breaches any term of the report given or provided to Beneficiaries by the Client. Contract (including, but not limited to, the obligations in clause 4) which is incapable of remedy or if remediable, is not remedied within five days of notice of the breach. 6.6 The Client shall procure that any person to whom the Services are made available shall notify GroundSure of any request or requirement to disclose, publish or disseminate any information contained in the Services in accordance with the 9. Client’s Right to Terminate and Suspend Freedom of Information Act 2000, the Environmental Information Regulations 9.1 Subject to clause 10.1, the Client may at any time upon written notice terminate 2004 or any associated legislation or regulations in force from time to time. or suspend the provision of all or any of the Services. 9.2 In any event, where the Client is a consumer (and not a business) he/she hereby 7.Liability: Particular Attention Should Be Paid To This Clause expressly acknowledges and agrees that: 7.1 This Clause 7 sets out the entire liability of GroundSure, including any liability (i) the supply of Services under this Contract (and therefore the for the acts or omissions of its employees, agents, consultants, subcontractors and performance of this Contract) commences immediately upon GroundSure's Third Party Content, in respect of: acceptance of the Order; and (i) any breach of contract, including any deliberate breach of (ii) the Reports and/or Mapping provided under this Contract are the Contract by GroundSure or its employees, agents or subcontractors; (a) supplied to the Client's specification(s) and in any event (ii) any use made of the Reports, Services, Materials or any (b) by their nature cannot be returned. part of them; and 10 Consequences of Withdrawal, Termination or Suspension (iii) any representation, statement or tortious act or omission (including negligence) arising under or in connection with the Contract. 10.1 Upon termination of the Contract: 7.2 All warranties, conditions and other terms implied by statute or common law (i) GroundSure shall take steps to bring to an end the Services in are, to the fullest extent permitted by law, excluded from the Contract. an orderly manner, vacate any Site with all reasonable speed and shall deliver to the 7.3 Nothing in the Contract limits or excludes the liability of the Supplier for death Client and/or Beneficiary any property of the Client and/or Beneficiary in GroundSure’s possession or control; and law and any proceedings arising out of or connected with this Contract shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts. (ii) the Client shall pay to GroundSure all and any Fees payable in respect of the performance of the Services up to the date of termination or 12.13 GroundSure is an executive member of the Council of Property Search suspension. In respect of any Support Services provided, the Client shall also pay Organisation (CoPSO) and has signed up to the Search Code administered by the GroundSure any additional costs incurred in relation to the termination or Property Codes Compliance Board (PCCB). All Risk Screening Reports shall be suspension of the Contract. supplied in accordance with the provisions of the Search Code. 12.14 If the Client or Beneficiary has a complaint about the Services, written notice 11 Anti-Bribery should be given to the Compliance Officer at GroundSure who will respond in a timely manner. 11.1 The Client warrants that it shall: 12.15 The Client agrees that it shall, and shall procure that each Beneficiary shall, (i) comply with all applicable laws, statutes and regulations treat in confidence all Confidential Information and shall not, and shall procure that relating to anti-bribery and anti-corruption including but not limited to the Bribery each Beneficiary shall not (i) disclose any Confidential Information to any third Act 2010; party other than in accordance with the terms of this Contract; and (ii) use (ii) comply with such of GroundSure's anti-bribery and anti- Confidential Information for a purpose other than the exercise of its rights and corruption policies as are notified to the Client from time to time; and obligations under this Contract. Subject to clause 6.6, nothing shall prevent the (iii) promptly report to GroundSure any request or demand for Client or any Beneficiary from disclosing Confidential Information to the extent any undue financial or other advantage of any kind received by or on behalf of the required by law. © GroundSure Limited June 2013 Client in connection with the performance of this Contract. 11.2 Breach of this Clause 11 shall be deemed a material breach of this Contract.

12 General 12.1 The Mapping contained in the Services is protected by Crown copyright and must not be used for any purpose other than as part of the Services or as specifically provided in the Contract. 12.2 The Client shall be permitted to make one copy only of each Report or Mapping Order. Thereafter the Client shall be entitled to make unlimited copies of the Report or Mapping Order only in accordance with an Ordnance Survey paper map copy license available through GroundSure. 12.3 GroundSure reserves the right to amend or vary this Contract. No amendment or variation to this Contract shall be valid unless signed by an authorised representative of GroundSure. 12.4 No failure on the part of GroundSure to exercise, and no delay in exercising, any right, power or provision under this Contract shall operate as a waiver thereof. 12.5 Save as expressly provided in this Contract, no person other than the persons set out therein shall have any right under the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 to enforce any terms of the Contract. 12.6 The Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills (“BIS”) or BIS’ successor body, as the case may be, acting through Ordnance Survey may enforce a breach of clause 6.4(vi) and clause 6.4(vii) of these terms and conditions against the Client in accordance with the provisions of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. 12.7 GroundSure shall not be liable to the Client if the provision of the Services is delayed or prevented by one or more of the following circumstances: (i) the Client or Beneficiary’s failure to provide facilities, access or information; (ii) fire, storm, flood, tempest or epidemic; (iii) Acts of God or the public enemy; (iv) riot, civil commotion or war; (v) strikes, labour disputes or industrial action; (vi) acts or regulations of any governmental or other agency; (vii) suspension or delay of services at public registries by Third Party Data Providers; (viii) changes in law; or (ix) any other reason beyond GroundSure’s reasonable control. In the event that GroundSure is prevented from performing the Services (or any part thereof) in accordance with this clause 12.6 for a period of not less than 30 days then GroundSure shall be entitled to terminate this Contract immediately on written notice to the Client. 12.8 Any notice provided shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered by hand or sent by first class post, facsimile or by email to the address, facsimile number or email address of the relevant party as may have been notified by each party to the other for such purpose or in the absence of such notification the last known address. 12.9 Such notice shall be deemed to have been received on the day of delivery if delivered by hand, facsimile or email (save to the extent such day is not a working day where it shall be deemed to have been delivered on the next working day) and on the second working day after the day of posting if sent by first class post. 12.10 The Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and shall supersede all previous arrangements between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. 12.11 Each of the provisions of the Contract is severable and distinct from the others and if one or more provisions is or should become invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be tainted or impaired. 12.12 This Contract shall be governed by and construed in accordance with English Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

Appendix D PBA Methodology for Geoenvironmental Risk Assessment

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment (Contamination) Glenmore Farm, Westbury

J:\27325 Glenmore Farm, Westbury\013_Phase 1 DTS_RGE\03 Reports\141216_Glenmore Farm GCA Issue_Rev01.docx

PBA Methodology for Assessment of Potentially Contaminated Land

1 Introduction For the purposes of Part 2A, land is contaminated if it This document defines the approach adopted by PBA poses a significant possibility of significant harm in relation to the assessment of potentially (SPOSH). contaminated land in England. The aim is for the approach to (i) be systematic and objective, (ii) provide Part 2A provides a means of dealing with unacceptable for the assessment of uncertainty and (iii) provide a risks posed by land contamination to human health and rational, consistent, transparent framework. the environment, and under the guidance enforcing authorities should seek to find and deal with such land. When preparing our methodology we have made It states that “under Part 2A the starting point should be reference to various technical guidance documents and that land is not contaminated land unless there is legislation referenced in Section 7 of which the reason to consider otherwise. Only land where principal documents are Contaminated Land Statutory unacceptable risks are clearly identified, after a risk Guidance (Defra 2012) the Model Procedures for the assessment has been undertaken in accordance with Management of Contamination (CLR 11) (EA 2004) the Guidance, should be considered as meeting the Contaminated land risk assessment: A guide to good Part 2A definition of contaminated land”. Further the practice (C552) (CIRIA 2001) and the National guidance makes it clear that “regulatory decisions Planning Policy Framework (DCLG 2012). should be based on what is reasonably likely, not what is hypothetically possible”.

2 Dealing with Land Contamination The overarching objectives of the Government’s policy UK legislation aims to help address the problem of on contaminated land and the Part 2A regime are: historic contamination of land and the risks it can pose to people’s health, controlled water and the “(a) To identify and remove unacceptable risks to environment by determining if a contaminant linkage human health and the environment. exists. This requires the three elements of receptor; (a) To seek to ensure that contaminated land is pathway and source (hazard) to be present. made suitable for its current use. (b) To ensure that the burdens faced by There are several ways in which land contamination individuals, companies and society as a whole can be addressed. For example, voluntarily where are proportionate, manageable and action is taken independently by landowners, when compatible with the principles of sustainable land is developed (or redeveloped) under the planning development”. system, during the building control process using building regulations, or, forced remediation under the In accordance with the guidance, the enforcing Part 2A regime. Other legislative regimes may also authority may need to decide whether and how to act in provide a means of dealing with land contamination situations where decisions are not straightforward, and issues, such as the regimes for waste, water, where there is uncertainty. “In so doing, the authority environmental permitting, and environmental damage. should use its judgement to strike a reasonable Further, the law of statutory nuisance may result in balance between: (a) dealing with risks raised by contaminants being unacceptable to third parties whilst contaminants in land and the benefits of remediating not attracting action under Part 2A or other land to remove or reduce those risks; and (b) the environmental legislation. potential impacts of regulatory intervention including financial costs to whoever will pay for remediation, 2.1 Part 2A health and environmental impacts of taking action, The Environment Act 1995 introduced Part 2A into the property blight, and burdens on affected people”. The Environmental Protection Act 1990. Part 2A, its authority is required to “take a precautionary approach accompanying regulations and original Statutory to the risks raised by contamination, whilst avoiding a Guidance came into force in England in April 2000. disproportionate approach given the circumstances of The legislation was extended in August 2006 to include each case”. The aim is “that the regime produces net radiological hazards. benefits, taking account of local circumstances”.

Revised Statutory Guidance was issued April 2012. The guidance recognises that “normal levels of (Defra 2012) to clarify how the regime should operate. contaminants in soils should not be considered to The guidance states that enforcing authorities should cause land to qualify as contaminated land, unless seek to use Part 2A only where no appropriate there is a particular reason to consider otherwise”. alternative solution exists. Normal levels are quoted as: Part 2A defines contaminated land as “land which “a) natural presence of contaminants’ such as appears to the Local Authority in whose area it is from underlying geology ‘that have not been situated to be in such a condition that, by reason of shown to pose an unacceptable risk to health substances in, on or under the land that significant and the environment harm is being caused, or there is a significant b) …low level diffuse pollution, and common possibility that such harm could be caused, or pollution human activity…” of controlled waters is being, or likely to be, caused”. Similarly the guidance states that significant pollution of Harm is defined as “harm to the health of living controlled waters is required for land to be considered organisms or other interference with the ecological contaminated and the “fact that substances are merely systems of which they form part, and in the case of entering water” or “where discharge from land is not man, includes harm to his property”. discernible at a location immediately downstream” does not constitute contaminated land.

Revision June 2013 Page 1 of 8

PBA Methodology for Assessment of Potentially Contaminated Land The guidance considers four categorisations to However, the level at which contamination is deemed establish if land is contaminated by either presenting to be unacceptable, or, gives rise to adverse effects an unacceptable risk to human health or significant under a planning context has not been identified but is pollution of controlled waters (Categories 1 and 2) or envisaged to be more precautionary than the level where not (Categories 3 and 4). required to detrmine land as contaminated under Part 2A. Category 1: “unacceptably high probability, supported by robust scientific evidence, that significant harm or The current SGV and GAC are not considered target significant pollution would occur”. These situations can values for the planning regime. In paragraph 121 the arise where similar land or exposures are known or developer is required to ensure that land, after strongly suspected to have caused harm. development, is not capable of being determined as contaminated land under Part 2A of the EPA 1990. Category 4: “no risk or that the level of risk is low”. These situations can arise where no contaminant The principal planning objective is to ensure that any linkage is established or normal/background levels of unacceptable risks to human health, buildings and contaminants are present, or where the exposure from other property and the natural and historical soil is only a small proportion of what the receptors may environment from the contaminated condition of the be exposed to. land are identified so that appropriate action can be considered and taken to address those risks. In order For land that cannot be readily placed into Categories 1 to grant a planning permission the Local Planning or 4 further assessment is required. If there is a Authority (LPA) has to be satisfied that there is sufficiently strong case that the risks are of sufficient sufficient information about the condition of the land, its concern to cause significant harm/pollution or have the impacts and the availability of viable remedial options. significant possibility of significant harm/pollution the NPPF Paragraph 21 states that “planning policies and land is to be placed into Category 2. If the concern is decisions should also ensure that adequate site not met land is considered Category 3. investigation information, prepared by a competent person, is presented”. Site investigation information is The technical guidance clearly states that the currently further defined in the NPPF Glossary page 56 and that published SGV and GAC’s represent “cautious also states that investigations should be carried out in estimates of level of contaminants in soils” which accordance with established procedures, including should be considered “no risk to health or, at most, a BS10175 (BSI 2011) that in turn links procedure to the minimal risk”. These values do not represent the requirements of CLR11. boundary between categories 3 and 4 and “should be considered to be comfortably within Category 4”. 2.3 Building Control

2.2 Planning The building control department of the local authority (along with the private sector approved inspectors) are The Local Planning Authority (LPA) is responsible for responsible for the operation and enforcement of the the control of development, and in doing so it has a Building Regulations 2010 (DCLG 2010) to protect the duty to take account of all material considerations, health, safety and welfare of people in and around including contamination. buildings and Building Control Regulations Approved Document C. Specifically requires the protection of Section 11, Paragraph 109 of the National Planning buildings and associated land from the effects of Policy Framework (NPPF) (DCLG 2012) states the contamination, to be applied (non-exclusively) in all planning system should contribute to and enhance the changes of use from commercial or industrial premises, natural and local environment by “preventing both new to residential property. and existing developments from contributing to or being put at unacceptable risk from, or being adversely 3 Approach affected by unacceptable levels of soil, air, water CLR 11 recommends a phased or tiered approach to pollution” and “remediating and mitigating despoiled, risk assessment with the three tiers being:- degraded, derelict, contaminated and unstable land,  Tier 1 - preliminary – a qualitative assessment where appropriate”. Paragraphs 120 and 121 describe forming part of a Phase 1 report, the policy considerations the Government expects LPA  Tier 2 - generic - a quantitative assessment using to have in regard to land affected by contamination published criteria to screen site specific ground when preparing policies for development plans and in condition data forming part of a Phase 2 report taking decisions on applications.  Tier 3 - detailed – a quantitative assessment involving the generation of site specific For planning purposes, the NPPF requires that the assessment criteria assessment of risks arising from contamination and remediation requirements should be considered on the Each tier of risk assessment comprises the following basis of the current environmental setting, the current four stages:- land use, and the circumstances of its proposed new use. 1. Hazard Identification – identifying potential In most other respects, however, the underlying contaminant sources on and off site; approach to identifying and dealing with risk, and the 2. Hazard Assessment – assessing the potential for overall policy objective of safeguarding human health unacceptable risks by identifying what pathways and the environment, are similar to that outlined in Part and receptors could be present, and what pollutant 2A. linkages could result (forming the Conceptual Site Model (CSM));

Revision June 2013 Page 2 of 8

PBA Methodology for Assessment of Potentially Contaminated Land 3. Risk Estimation – estimating the magnitude and 4.1 Hazard Identification probability of the possible consequences (what degree of harm might result to a defined receptor A hazard is a substance or situation that has the and how likely); and potential to cause harm. Hazards may be chemical, biological or physical (e.g. explosive gases). 4. Risk Evaluation – evaluating whether the risk needs to be, and can be, managed. At Tier 1 the potential for hazards to be present is determined from consideration of the previous or A PBA Phase 1 report normally comprises a desk ongoing activities on or near to the site in accordance study, walkover and Tier 1 risk assessment (the project with the criteria presented in the Table 1. specific offer defines the actual scope of work). This is the minimum requirement as defined by the NPPF, Based on the land use information Potential pp56. At Tier 1 the PBA approach to risk estimation Contaminants of Concern (PCOC) are identified. The involves identifying the magnitude of the potential PCOC direct the scope of the collection of site specific consequence (taking into account both the potential data and the analytical testing selected for subsequent severity of the hazard and the sensitivity of the Tiers. receptor) and the magnitude of the likelihood i.e. the probability (taking into account the presence of the At Tier 2 the site specific data is screened using hazard and the receptor and the integrity of the published assessment criteria (refer to PBA document pathway). This approach is promoted in current entitled Rationale for the Selection of Tier 2 guidance such as R&D 66 (NHBC 2008). Assessment Criteria). In general, published criteria have been developed using highly conservative The PBA approach is that if a pollution linkage is assumptions and therefore if the screening criterion is identified then it represents a potential risk which not exceeded then the PCOC is eliminated as a requires further consideration and either (1) potential Hazard. It should be noted that exceedance remediation / direct risk management or (2) further tiers does not necessarily indicate that a site is of assessment. contaminated and/or unsuitable for use only that the PCOC is retained as a potential Hazard. Published A PBA preliminary Phase 2 report comprises an criteria are generated using models based on intrusive investigation to collect site specific numerous and complex assumptions. Whether or not information, a Tier 2 quantitative generic risk these assumptions are appropriate in a site-specific assessment and a refinement of the CSM using the site context requires confirmation on a project by project specific data. Depending on the findings further basis and would form part of a Tier 3 assessment. investigation and/or progression to Tier 3 risk assessment and the generation of site specific When reviewing or assessing site specific data PBA assessment criteria may be required. utilise published guidance on comparing contamination data with a critical concentration (CL:AIRE/CIEH 2008) The PBA methodology provides an estimate of the level which presents a structured process for employing of risk, it does not identify a risk level at which the risk statistical techniques for data assessment purposes. is considered “significant” and/or “unacceptable” as this The benefit of the statistical tool is uncertainty is is dependant on the view of the individual / stakeholder. quantified and decisions are made knowing the For example; to a risk adverse stakeholder even a risk strength of the evidence. Correct decision probability is level of “very low” may be considered unacceptable a function of sample size, difference in the mean and and as such this stakeholder may require risk the critical concentration, variation in measured values management options to be implemented. and the significance level.

4 Identification of Pollutant Linkages and 4.2 Receptor and Pathway Identification Conceptual Site Model (CSM) For all Tiers the potential receptors (for both on site and For all Tiers the underlying principle to ground condition adjoining land) that will be considered are: assessment is the identification of pollutant linkages in • Human Health – including current and future order to evaluate whether the presence of a source of occupiers, construction and future maintenance contamination could potentially lead to harmful workers, and neighbouring properties/third parties; 1 consequences. A pollutant linkage consists of the • Ecological systems; * following three elements:- • Controlled waters *2 – including surface water and groundwater; • A source/hazard – a substance or situation which • Property, Animal or Crop (existing or proposed) - has the potential to cause harm or pollution; including buildings, service lines and pipes, crops, livestock, pets, woodland; and • A pathway – a means by which the hazard moves • Archaeological sites and ancient monuments. along / generates exposure; and *1 International or nationally designated sites (as defined in the • A receptor/target – an entity which is vulnerable to statutory guidance (Defra Circular 04/12)) “in the local area” will the potential adverse effects of the hazard. be identified as potential ecological receptors. A search radius of 1, 2 or 5km will be utilised depending on the site specific circumstances (see also pathway identification). The The Conceptual Site Model identifies the types and Environment Agency has published an ecological risk locations of potential contaminant sources/hazards and assessment framework (EA 2008) which promotes (as opposed potential receptors and potential to statutorily enforces) consideration of additional receptors to migration/transportation pathway(s). The CSM is include locally protected sites and protected or notable species. refined as the assessment progresses through the These additional potential receptors will only be considered if a Tiers. Phase 1 habitat survey, undertaken in accordance with

Revision June 2013 Page 3 of 8

PBA Methodology for Assessment of Potentially Contaminated Land guidance (JNCC 1993), is commissioned and the data provided attributes has not been undertaken) and pathways (a to PBA. It should be noted that without such a survey the Tier food chain assessment has not been undertaken). 1 risk assessment may conclude that the identification of Step 9 is outside the scope of our standard Phase 1 potential ecological receptors is inconclusive (see report. Specification).

*2 the definition of “pollution of controlled water” was amended The Tier 1 prepared by PBA as part of a Phase 1 report by the introduction of Section 86 of the Water Act 2003. For will assess the viability of the mode of transport given the purposes of Part 2A groundwater does not include waters the site specific circumstances not specific pathways. above the saturated zone and our assessment does not As with receptor identification it should be noted that therefore address perched water other than where without a habitat survey the Tier 1 risk assessment may development causes a pathway to develop. conclude that the risk to potential ecological receptors is inconclusive (see PBA Specification for Phase 1 If a receptor is taken forward for further assessment it Assessment of Potentially Contaminated Land). will be classified in terms of its sensitivity, the criteria for which are presented in Table 2. Table 2 has been 4.4 Note regarding Water Framework Directive generated using descriptions of environmental receptor importance/value given in various guidance documents The Water Framework Directive (WFD) (2000) aims to including R&D 66 (NHBC 2008) and Transport Analysis protect and enhance the quality of surface freshwater, Guidance (based on DETR 2000). Human health and groundwaters and dependent eco systems, estuaries buildings classifications have been generated by PBA and coastal waters. The WFD was transposed into UK using the attribute description for each class. law in 2003 (Statutory Instruments 2003). Member states must aim to reach good chemical and ecological The exposure pathway and modes of transport that will status as defined in the Directive by 2015. be considered are presented in Table 3. To address the WFD, a River Basin Management Plan (RBMP) has been developed for the 11 River Basin 4.3 Note regarding Ecological Systems Districts in England and Wales. These were released The Environment Agency (EA) has developed an by Defra in 2009 (Defra 2009). ecological risk assessment framework which aims to provide a structured approach for assessing the risks to These RBMP’s establish the current status of waters ecology from chemical contaminants in soils (EA 2008). within the catchments of the respective Districts and In circumstances where contaminants in water the current status of adjoining waters identified. As part represent a potential risk to aquatic ecosystems then of a Tier 2 risk assessment water quality data is risk assessors will need to consider this separately. screened against the WFD assessment criteria. Compare to the RBMP’s current status of waters for the The framework consists of a three tiered process:- catchment under consideration would form part of a Tier 3 assessment. • Tier 1 is a screening step where the site soils chemical data is compared to a soil screening value (SSV) 5 Risk Estimation • Tier 2 uses various tools (including surveys and Risk estimation classifies what degree of harm might biological testing) to gather evidence for any harm result to a receptor (defined as consequence) and how to the ecological receptors likely it is that such harm might arise (probability). • Tier 3 seeks to attribute the harm to the chemical At Tier 1 the consequence classification is generated contamination by multiplying the hazard classification score and the receptor sensitivity score. This approach follows that Tier 1 is preceded by a desk study to collate presented in the republished R&D 66 (NHBC 2008). information about the site and the nature of the contamination to assess whether pollutant linkages are The criteria for classifying probability are set out in feasible. The framework presents ten steps for Table 4 and have been taken directly from Table 6.4 ecological desk studies and development of a CIRIA C552 (CIRIA 2001). Probability considers the conceptual site model as follows. integrity of the exposure pathway.

1 Establish Regulatory Context The consequence classifications detailed in Table 5 2 Collate and Assess Documentary Information have been adapted from Table 6.3 presented in C552 3 Summarise Documentary Information and R&D 66 (Annex 4 Table A4.3). 4 Identify Potential Contaminants of Concern 5 Identify Likely Fate Transport of Contaminants The Tier 1 risk classification is estimated for each 6 Identify Potential Receptors of Concern pollutant linkage using the matrix given in Table 6 7 Identify Potential Pathways of Concern which is taken directly from C552 (Table 6.5). 8 Create a Conceptual Site Model Subsequent Tiers refine the CSM through retention or 9 Identify Assessment and Measurement Endpoints elimination of potential hazards and pollutant linkages. 10 Identify Gaps and Uncertainties

The information in a standard PBA Phase 1 report 6 Risk Evaluation covers Steps 1 to 4 inclusive. Step 5 considers fate In order to put the Tier 1 risk classification into context and transport of contaminants and it should be noted the likely actions are described in Table 7 which is that our standard report adopts a simplified approach taken directly from C552 (Table 6.6). Subsequent Tiers considering only transport mechanisms. A simplified identify potential risk management options through approach has also been adopted in respect of Steps 6 remediation and/or mitigation measures. and 7 receptors (a detailed review of the ecological

Revision June 2013 Page 4 of 8

PBA Methodology for Assessment of Potentially Contaminated Land 7 References BSI 2007 BS 8485 Code of Practice for characterisation and remediation from ground gas in affected developments.

BSI 2011 BS 10175 (2011) Code of practice - Investigation of potentially contaminated sites

CIRIA 2001: Contaminated land risk assessment – a guide to good practice C552.

CIRIA 2008: Assessing risks posed by hazardous ground gases to buildings C655

CL:AIRE/EIH 2008 Guidance on Company Soil Contamination Data with a Critical Concentration

DCLG 2010 Building Regulations 2010 Approved Document C Site preparation and resistance to contaminants and moisture.

DCLG March 2012. National Planning Policy Framework.

DETR 2000 Methodology for Multi Modal Studies. Volume 2 Section 4. The Environmental Objective.

Defra Circular 01/2006

Defra Circular 04/2012 Environmental Protection Act 1990: Part 2A. Contaminated Land Statutory Guidance.

Defra ‘2009 Water for Life and Livelihoods. River Basin Management Plan. (11 Districts: Anglia, Dee, Humber, Northumbria, Northwest, Severn, Solway and Tweed, Southeast, Thames, Western Wales) December 2009

EA 2004: The Model Procedures for the Management of Land Contamination CRL 11 published by the Environment Agency (EA).

EA 2008 Ecological Risk Assessment Science Report Series SC070009 published by the Environment Agency (EA).

European Community 2000 Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)

JNCC 1993 Handbook for Phase 1 Habitat Survey – A Technical for Environmental Audit prepared by the Joint Nature Conservancy Council (JNCC)

NHBC/EA/CIEH 2008: R&D Publication 66 Guidance for the safe development of housing on land affected by contamination.

Statutory Instrument 2003 No. 3242 Water Resources, England and Wales. The Water Environment (Water Framework Directive) Regulations 2003.

Revision June 2013 Page 5 of 8

PBA Methodology for Assessment of Potentially Contaminated Land

Table 1: Criteria for Classifying Hazards / Potential for Generating Contamination Classification/Score Potential for generating contamination/gas based on land use Very Low Land Use: agriculture, residential, allotment, recent retail or office use Contamination: None or low level residual concentrations. 1 Gas generation potential : Inert Made Ground Low Land Use: recent small scale industrial, railway tracks, small scale fuel storage (heating). Contamination: Locally or slightly elevated concentrations. 2 Gas generation potential : Shallow thickness of Alluvium Moderate Land Use: railway yards, collieries, scrap yards, light industry, engineering works. Contamination: Locally elevated concentrations. 3 Gas generation potential : Dock silt and substantial thickness of organic alluvium/peat High Land Use: gas works, chemical works, heavy industry, non-hazardous landfills. Contamination: Possible widespread elevated concentrations. 4 Gas generation potential : Shallow mine workings Pre 1960’s landfill Very High Land Use: hazardous waste landfills. Contamination: Likely widespread elevated concentrations. 5 Gas generation potential : Domestic landfill post 1960 “Greenfield” is land which has not been developed including not used for crop production or animal husbandry and no contamination source therefore no pollutant linkages.

Table 2: Criteria for Classifying Receptor Sensitivity/Value Classification/Score Definition Very Low Receptor of limited importance Groundwater: Unproductive 1 Surface water: None and/or >250m hydraulically down gradient Ecology: No local designation Buildings: Replaceable Human health: Unoccupied/limited access Low Receptor of local or county importance with potential for replacement Groundwater: Secondary B 2 Surface water: Tertiary <100m hydraulically down gradient Ecology: local habitat resources Buildings: Local value Human health: Minimum score of 4 Moderate Receptor of local or county importance with potential for replacement Groundwater: Secondary A 3 Surface water: Tertiary <50m or Secondary <100m hydraulically down gradient Ecology: County wildlife sites, Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) Buildings: Area of Historic Character Human health: Commercial High Receptor of county or regional importance with limited potential for replacement Groundwater: Principal 4 Surface water: Secondary <50m or Primary <100m hydraulically down gradient Ecology: SSSI, National or Marine Nature Reserve (NNR or MNR) Buildings: Conservation Area Human health: Minimum score where human health identified as potential receptor Very High Receptor of national or international importance Groundwater: Source Protection Zone 5 Surface water: Primary <50m hydraulically down gradient Ecology: Special Areas of Conservation (SAC and candidates), Special Protection Areas (SPA and potentials) or wetlands of international importance (RAMSAR) Buildings: World Heritage site Human health: Residential, open spaces and uses where children are present

Revision June 2013 Page 6 of 8

PBA Methodology for Assessment of Potentially Contaminated Land

Table 3: Exposure Pathway and Modes of Transport Receptor Pathway Mode of transport Human health Ingestion Fruit or vegetable leaf or roots Contaminated water Soil/dust indoors Soil/dust outdoors Inhalation Particles (dust / soil) – outdoor Particles (dust / soil) - indoor Vapours – outdoor - migration via natural or anthropogenic pathways Vapours - indoor - migration via natural or anthropogenic pathways Dermal absorption Direct contact with soil Direct contact with waters (swimming / showering) Irradiation Groundwater Leaching Gravity / permeation Migration Natural – groundwater as pathway Anthropogenic (e.g. boreholes, culverts, pipelines etc.) Surface Water Direct Runoff or discharges from pipes Indirect Recharge from groundwater Indirect Deposition of wind blown dust Buildings Direct contact Sulphate attack on concrete, hydrocarbon corrosion of plastics Gas ingress Migration via natural or anthropogenic paths Ecological systems See Notes Runoff/discharge to surface water body See Notes Windblown dust See Notes Groundwater migration See Notes At point of contaminant source Animal and crop Direct Wind blown or flood deposited particles / dust / sediments Indirect Plants via root up take or irrigation. Animals through watering Inhalation By livestock / fish - gas / vapour / particulates / dust Ingestion Consumption of vegetation / water / soil by animals

Table 4: Classification of Probability Classification Definition High likelihood There is a pollution linkage and an event either appears very likely in the short-term and almost inevitable over the long-term, or there is already evidence at the receptor of harm / pollution. Likely There is a pollution linkage and all the elements are present and in the right place, which means that it is probable that an event will occur. Circumstances are such that an event is not inevitable, but possible in the short-term and likely over the long-term. Low likelihood There is a pollution linkage and circumstances are possible under which an event could occur. However, it is by no means certain that even over a longer period such event would take place, and is less likely in the shorter-term. Unlikely There is a pollution linkage but circumstances are such that it is improbable that an event would occur even in the very long-term.

Revision June 2013 Page 7 of 8

PBA Methodology for Assessment of Potentially Contaminated Land Table 5: Classification of Consequence (score = magnitude of hazard Table 1 and sensitivity of receptor Table 2) Classification / Score Examples Severe Human health effect - exposure likely to result in “significant harm”. Significant harm to humans is defined in circular 01/2006 as death, disease, serious injury, genetic mutation, birth defects or impairment of reproductive function.

Controlled water effect - short-term risk of pollution (note: Water Resources Act contains no scope for 20-25 considering significance of pollution) of sensitive water resource. Equivalent to EA Category 1 incident (persistent and/or extensive effects on water quality leading to closure of potable abstraction point or loss of amenity, agriculture or commercial value. Major fish kill. Ecological effect - short-term exposure likely to result in a substantial adverse effect. Catastrophic damage to crops, buildings or property Medium Human health effect - exposure could result in “significant harm”. Significant harm to humans is defined in circular 01/2006 as death, disease, serious injury, genetic mutation, birth defects or impairment of reproductive function. 10-16 Controlled water effect - equivalent to EA Category 2 incident requiring notification of abstractor Ecological effect - short-term exposure may result in a substantial adverse effect. Damage to crops, buildings or property Mild Human health effect - exposure may result in “significant harm”. Significant harm to humans is defined in circular 01/2006 as death, disease, serious injury, genetic mutation, birth defects or impairment of reproductive function. 6-9 Controlled water effect - equivalent to EA Category 3 incident (short lived and/or minimal effects on water quality). Ecological effect - unlikely to result in a substantial adverse effect. Minor damage to crops, buildings or property. Damage to building rendering it unsafe to occupy (for example foundation damage resulting in instability). Minor No measurable effect on humans. Protective equipment is not required during site works. Equivalent to insubstantial pollution incident with no observed effect on water quality or ecosystems. 1-5 Repairable effects to crops, buildings or property. The loss of plants in a landscaping scheme. Discolouration of concrete.

Table 6: Classification of Risk (Combination of Consequence Table 5 and Probability Table 4) Consequence Probability Severe Medium Mild Minor High likelihood Very high High Moderate Low Likely High Moderate Moderate/low Low Low likelihood Moderate Moderate/low Low Very low Unlikely Moderate/low Low Very low Very low

Table 7: Description of Risks and Likely Action Required Risk Classification Description Very high risk There is a high probability that severe harm could arise to a designated receptor from an identified hazard, OR, there is evidence that severe harm to a designated receptor is currently happening. This risk, if realised, is likely to result in a substantial liability. Urgent investigation (if not undertaken already) and remediation is likely to be required in the short term. High risk Harm is likely to arise to a designated receptor from an identified hazard. Realisation of the risk is likely to present a substantial liability. Urgent investigation (if not undertaken already) is required and remedial works may be necessary in the short-term and are likely over the longer-term. Moderate risk It is possible that harm could arise to a designated receptor from an identified hazard. However, it is either relatively unlikely that any such harm would be severe, or if any harm were to occur it is more likely that the harm would be relatively mild. Investigation (if not already undertaken) is normally required to clarify the risk and to determine the potential liability. Some remedial works may be required in the longer-term. Low risk It is possible that harm could arise to a designated receptor from an identified hazard, but it is likely that this harm, if realised, would at worst normally be mild. Very low risk There is a low possibility that harm could arise to a receptor. In the event of such harm being realised it is not likely to be severe.

Revision June 2013 Page 8 of 8