DOCSLIB.ORG

Briefing Memo TAB D: Alaska Federation of Natives Memo

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Briefing Memo TAB D: Alaska Federation of Natives Memo EVENT MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY MEETING WITH MONTANA GOVERNOR DATE: Monday, March 13 LOCATION: Governor’s Office TIME: 1:45 pm FROM: Tim Williams External and Intergovernmental affairs, 202-706-4982 I. PURPOSE Opportunity to reset dialog between the State and the department of the Interior. In the past the states have felt they were ignored and did not have a seat at the table. The states want a dialog since they feel they have to live the consequences of the Department's decisions. II. PARTICIPANTS Steve Bullock: Governor. 1st elected in 2013. Patrick Holmes: Natural Resources Policy Advisor, Governor’s Office Adam Schafer: Senior Advisor & Director of Public Engagement, Governor’s Office, Montana Advance: Rusty Roddy, DOI, Office of Secretary, III. AGENDA This is an open conversation between the Secretary, Governor and some of his key staff concerning Montana and their issues. 1:45PM Start of meeting 2:15PM Secretary Zinke departs IV. KEY FACTS/HOT TOPICS Grizzly - Governor supports delisting Bison and the possibility of a in-state quarantine station Sage Grouse Invasive Species V. TALKING POINTS/REMARKS None VI. BACKGROUND None. VII. ATTACHMENTS None 1 2/21/2017 9:46 AM INFORMATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY SECRETARY ZINKE VISIT TO NATIONAL BISON RANGE DATE: March 9, 2017 FROM: Noreen Walsh, Regional Director, Mountain-Prairie Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, (303) 236-7920 SUBJECT: National Bison Range I. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE To inform the Secretary about the National Bison Range in Montana. II. BACKGROUND The National Bison Range (NBR) was established on May 23, 1908, when President Theodore Roosevelt signed legislation authorizing funds to purchase suitable land for the conservation of bison. The overall mission of the 18,800-acre NBR is to maintain a representative herd of bison to ensure the preservation of the species for continued public enjoyment. The NBR is one of the last intact publicly-owned intermountain native grasslands in the U.S. NBR is located completely within the boundary of the Flathead Reservation, home to the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes (CSKT). III. DISCUSSION Twenty years of negotiation for an Annual Funding Agreement (AFA) with CSKT has been met with mixed success due to litigation, personnel management issues, and differences in expectations regarding how the agreement should be crafted. In June of 2016, CSKT released draft legislation that would transfer management of NBR from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) to be held in trust for the CSKT, maintaining its management for bison and other wildlife. This action would support Indian Self Determination while maintaining these lands in federal ownership. A Notice of Intent (NOI) in the Federal Register on January 18, 2017 announcing FWS’s development of a comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) for the management of NBR began a scoping and engagement process with partners and the public. Included in the NOI, is an alternative that would transfer NBR to BIA. The CSKT will be invited to participate in the CCP development process. The comment period for the NOI closed on February 17, 2017. IV. NEXT STEPS Consolidate and analyze comments from the NOI. EVENT MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FLATHEAD RESERVATION EVENT IN GLACIER NP DATE: Friday, March 10 LOCATION: (Location of event) TIME: (Time of event—start to finish) FROM: (Memo’s author: name, title, office or bureau acronym, phone number) I. PURPOSE Provide a one-to-three paragraph description of the event and any relevant background information about the participants, the purpose of the event, and desired outcome. How does it support our mission? The information provided should do more than generally describe the purpose of the meeting or event. It should include the information the Secretary will need to participate effectively and meaningfully. This section should define the Secretary’s role as well as any information on the last time he met with this person/group. Longer background information, if necessary, can be provided as an attachment to the memo. II. PARTICIPANTS Provide a bulleted list of all key participants, including Members of Congress/Senators, stakeholders, other VIPs, and Department of Interior staff. If the list of participants is more than ten people include the list in an appendix. Please contact Caroline Boulton in the scheduling office and Melissa Simpson in the outreach office to confirm attendees. III. AGENDA Indicate the step-by-step (“tick-tock”) sequence of the event as indicated below, highlighting the Secretary’s role. Note if the meeting will be open or closed to press, and include any other relevant information about press components of the event. Please copy Caroline Boulton in the scheduling office to confirm the agenda, and Heather Swift to confirm press participation. 10:30AM Secretary Zinke opens the meeting by welcoming the participants and offering introductory comments 11:00AM Other speakers make remarks 11:30AM Secretary Zinke makes closing remarks 11:45AM Secretary Zinke takes questions from reporters, if appropriate 12:00PM Secretary Zinke departs IV. KEY FACTS/HOT TOPICS Provide any key facts, statistics, or hot topics related to this event which may highlight current issues. Where particular discussion topics, or questions from event participants can be anticipated, offer a suggested responses in italics. Statistics and key facts should be provided as a bulleted list with each bullet taking up no more than three lines. 1 2/21/2017 9:46 AM EVENT MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FLATHEAD RESERVATION EVENT IN GLACIER NP V. TALKING POINTS/REMARKS Identify the speechwriter or person/persons who will be responsible for creating the Secretary’s remarks. All remarks must be cleared with the Chief of Staff and the OS Communications office. Additionally, if this is a major event requiring lengthy remarks, a draft summary should be included as an attachment along with press releases and briefing papers. VI. BACKGROUND This section can be used to dive deeper into relevant policy issues, to provide a general history of the event, or to present the Department’s track record on relevant policy issues. It should also include any key points/bios about others involved in the event. VII. ATTACHMENTS Attach a list of additional items that the Secretary should review before the meeting including bios/background information on the participants or any policy papers as mentioned in Section I. Include only the items that are necessary for a successful meeting outcome, not general supplemental material. Date of Submission 2 2/21/2017 9:46 AM ATTACHMENT - 3/13/ 17 MEETING WITH MONTANA GOVERNOR Prepared by: Christine Bauserman, Special Assist. to Secretary, 202-70 6-9330, 3/9 SUMMARY Governor Steve Bullock. Claims to be a moderate. Vetoes conservative bills. Patrick Holmes, Natural Resources Policy Advisor, appears to be far left environmentalist. Advises the Governor on energy policy, water use, wildlife, state lands, and mining. Adam Schafer, Senior Advisor & Director of Public Engagement. Previous exec director of NCEL, National Council Environmental Legislators, which is committed to advancing environmental progressive legislation and opposes energy production unless ‘green’. Current Negative activism: opposing the annual Bison culling. Lead by the “Alliance for the Wild Rockies’ and environmental activist Steve Kelly. DETAILED Governor Steve Bullock Political / Professional Profile ● Political History: Governor of Montana, 1st elected 2013, won re-election in 2016 running against R Greg Gianforte (Trump won MT). ● Montana’s Attorney General - elected 2008 ● Private Sector experience: operated his own law firm, ● Chief Legal Counsel to MT Secretary of State, Chief Deputy Attny General - MT DOJ ● Adjunct Professor - George Washington Univ. Law School Personal Profile ● Birth State: Montana: born in Missoula, raised in Helena ● Party: Democrat ● Spouse: Lisa Downs Bullock ● Family: Married Lisa Downs Bullock; three children ● School(s): Claremont McKenna College, CA; Columbia University Law School, NY, Juris Doctor with honors Media Highlights “... Gov. Bullock, Interior Secretary nominee Ryan Zinke, and President Donald Trump have all said they oppose selling federal public lands… “ Yellowstone Bison Roundup ● Governor Bullock and Superintendent Wenk, being asked to expedite a new Interagency Bison Management Plan and adopt an alternative B of the Environmental Assessment on Year-round Habitat for Yellowstone Bison. ● 2/22/17 Billboards went up west of Bozeman, Montana on the highway leading to Yellowstone National Park and in Helena near the state capitol building asking Governor Steve Bullock to “Stop the Yellowstone Massacre.” ● Billboards lead by: Steve Kelly, environmental activist and Mike Garrity, Executive Director of the ‘Alliance for the Wild Rockies’ Recap of Governor’s votes from 2013, source is election win article ATTACHMENT - 3/13/ 17 MEETING WITH MONTANA GOVERNOR Prepared by: Christine Bauserman, Special Assist. to Secretary, 202-70 6-9330, 3/9 “... Many of the vetoed bills seek to advance typically conservative causes: tax reform, states’ rights, school choice, market oriented energy policies, and protecting 2nd Amendment rights. However, several of the bills also dealt with more centrist issues such as providing aid to Eastern Montana localities impacted by oil and gas development, and sportsmen’s issues, such as allowing hunters to use sound suppressors… “ Summation from election night article
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sequoia-Kings Canyon National Parks, However, Went Unnoticed
    • D -1:>K 1.2!;EQUOJA-KING$ Ci\NYON NATIONAL PARKS History of the Parks "''' Evaluation of Historic Resources Detennination of Effect, DCP Prepared by • A. Berle Clemensen DENVER SERVICE CENTER HISTORIC PRESERVATION TEA.'! NATIONAL PAP.K SERVICE UNITED STATES DEPAR'J'}fENT OF THE l~TERIOR DENVER, COLOR..\DO SEPTEffilER 1975 i i• Pl.EA5!: RETUl1" TO: B&WScans TEallillCAL INFORMAl!tll CfNIEil 0 ·l'i «coo,;- OOIVER Sf:RV!Gf Cf!fT£R llAT!ONAL PARK S.:.'Ma j , • BRIEF HISTORY OF SEQUOIA Spanish and Mexican Period The first white men, the Spanish, entered the San Joaquin Valley in 1772. They, however, only observed the Sierra Nevada mountains. None entered the high terrain where the giant Sequoia exist. Only one explorer came close to the Sierra Nevadas. In 1806 Ensign Gabriel Moraga, venturing into the foothills, crossed and named the Rio de la Santos Reyes (River of the Holy Kings) or Kings River. Americans in the San Joaquin Valley The first band of Americans entered the Valley in 1827 when Jedediah Smith and a group of fur traders traversed it from south to north. This journey ushered in the first American frontier as fifteen years of fur trapping followed. Still, none of these men reported sighting the giant trees. It was not until 1833 that members of the Joseph R. 1lalker expedition crossed the Sierra Nevadas and received credit as the first whites to See the Sequoia trees. These trees are presumed to form part of either the present M"rced or Tuolwnregroves. Others did not learn of their find since Walker's group failed to report their discovery.
    [Show full text]
  • OGC-98-5 U.S. Insular Areas: Application of the U.S. Constitution
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Committee on GAO Resources, House of Representatives November 1997 U.S. INSULAR AREAS Application of the U.S. Constitution GAO/OGC-98-5 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Office of the General Counsel B-271897 November 7, 1997 The Honorable Don Young Chairman Committee on Resources House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: More than 4 million U.S. citizens and nationals live in insular areas1 under the jurisdiction of the United States. The Territorial Clause of the Constitution authorizes the Congress to “make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property” of the United States.2 Relying on the Territorial Clause, the Congress has enacted legislation making some provisions of the Constitution explicitly applicable in the insular areas. In addition to this congressional action, courts from time to time have ruled on the application of constitutional provisions to one or more of the insular areas. You asked us to update our 1991 report to you on the applicability of provisions of the Constitution to five insular areas: Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (the CNMI), American Samoa, and Guam. You asked specifically about significant judicial and legislative developments concerning the political or tax status of these areas, as well as court decisions since our earlier report involving the applicability of constitutional provisions to these areas. We have included this information in appendix I. 1As we did in our 1991 report on this issue, Applicability of Relevant Provisions of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • B: Other U.S. Island Possessions in the Tropical Pacific
    Appendix B Other U.S. Island Possessions in the Tropical Pacific1 Introduction Howland, Jarvis, and Baker Islands There are eight isolated and unincorporated is- Howland, Jarvis and Baker are arid coral islands lands and reefs under U.S. control and sovereignty in the southern Line Island group (figure B-l). Aside in the tropical Pacific Basin. Included in this cate- from American Samoa, Jarvis Island is the only gory are: Kingman Reef, Palmyra and Johnston other U.S.-affiliated island in the Southern Hemi- Atolls in the northern Line Island group; Howland, sphere. These islands lie within one-half degree Baker and Jarvis Islands in the southern Line Is- from the equator, in the equatorial climatic zone. land group; Midway Atoll at the northwest end of During the 19th century the United States and the Hawaiian archipelago; and Wake Island north Britain actively exploited the significant guano de- of the Marshall Islands. Evidence indicates that posits found on these three islands. Jarvis Island some of these islands were not inhabited prior to was claimed by the United States in 1857, and sub- “Western” discovery; and today some remain unin- sequently annexed by Britain in 1889. Jarvis, Howland, habited. and Baker Islands were made territories of the These islands range from less than 1 degree south United States in 1936, and placed under the juris- latitude to nearly 29 degrees north latitude and from diction of the Department of the Interior. The is- 162 degrees west to 167 east longitude. The climate lands currently are uninhabited. regimes range from arid to wet and equatorial to These atolls were used as weather stations and subtropical.
    [Show full text]
  • Coral Reef Biological Criteria: Using the Clean Water Act to Protect a National Treasure
    EPA/600/R-10/054 | July 2010 | www.epa.gov/ord Coral Reef Biological Criteria: Using the Clean Water Act to Protect a National Treasure Offi ce of Research and Development | National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory EPA/600/R-10/054 July 2010 www.epa.gov/ord Coral Reef Biological Criteria Using the Clean Water Act to Protect a National Treasure by Patricia Bradley Leska S. Fore Atlantic Ecology Division Statistical Design NHEERL, ORD 136 NW 40th St. 33 East Quay Road Seattle, WA 98107 Key West, FL 33040 William Fisher Wayne Davis Gulf Ecology Division Environmental Analysis Division NHEERL, ORD Offi ce of Environmental Information 1 Sabine Island Drive 701 Mapes Road Gulf Breeze, FL 32561 Fort Meade, MD 20755 Contract No. EP-C-06-033 Work Assignment 3-11 Great Lakes Environmental Center, Inc Project Officer: Work Assignment Manager: Susan K. Jackson Wayne Davis Offi ce of Water Offi ce of Environmental Information Washington, DC 20460 Fort Meade, MD 20755 National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Offi ce of Research and Development Washington, DC 20460 Printed on chlorine free 100% recycled paper with 100% post-consumer fiber using vegetable-based ink. Notice and Disclaimer The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through its Offi ce of Research and Development, Offi ce of Environmental Information, and Offi ce of Water funded and collaborated in the research described here under Contract EP-C-06-033, Work Assignment 3-11, to Great Lakes Environmental Center, Inc. It has been subject to the Agency’s peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an EPA document.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Supports Establishment of Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument
    Proceedings of the 12 th International Coral Reef Symposium, Cairns, Australia, 9-13 July 2012 18F Does monitoring lead to improved coral reef management? Monitoring supports establishment of Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument Jean Kenyon 1, James Maragos 1, Peter Vroom 2 1U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Honolulu, HI U.S.A. 2Ocean Associates, San Diego, CA, contracted to NOAA Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, Coral Reef Ecosystem Division, Honolulu, HI, U.S.A. Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract. The U.S. Pacific Remote Islands consist of Howland, Baker, and Jarvis Islands, Johnston, Wake, and Palmyra Atolls, and Kingman Reef. Except for Wake, these islands and nearshore reefs have been administered as National Wildlife Refuges by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as early as 1926. Before regular marine assessment and monitoring efforts began in 2000, scientists had visited these locations to collect fishes, corals, and other reef life, but few systematic reef surveys were accomplished. Since 2000, systematic inventory and monitoring surveys for fishes, corals, and benthic algae have been conducted by NOAA and USFWS during biennial cruises. Knowledge of the biodiversity, community structure, and condition of these reefs has increased dramatically because of these cooperative monitoring efforts, exemplified by the increase in number of stony corals reported at Howland from 25 to 109, at Baker from 28 to 104, at Jarvis from 0 to 70, at Palmyra from 72 to 177, at Kingman from 0 to 182, at Johnston from 38 to 49, and at Wake from 52 to 97. Informed through these survey efforts of the diversity and abundance of marine biota supported on these central Pacific reefs, President George W.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument The Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument falls within the Central Pacific Ocean, ranging from Wake Atoll in the northwest to Jarvis Island in the southeast. The seven atolls and islands included within the monument are farther from human population centers than any other U.S. area. They represent one of the last frontiers and havens for wildlife in the world, and comprise the most widespread collection of coral reef, seabird, and shorebird protected areas on the planet under a single nation’s jurisdiction. At Howland Island, Baker Island, Jarvis Island, Palmyra Atoll, and Kingman Reef, the terrestrial areas, reefs, and waters out to 12 nautical miles (nmi) are part of the National Wildlife Refuge System. The land areas at Wake Atoll and Johnston Atoll remain under the jurisdiction of The giant clam, Tridacna gigas, is a clam that is the largest living bivalve mollusk. the U.S. Air Force, but the waters from Photo: © Kydd Pollock 0 to 12 nmi are protected as units of the National Wildlife Refuge System. For all of the areas, fishery-related Marine National Monument, and orders long time periods throughout their entire activities seaward from the 12-nmi refuge of magnitude greater than the reefs near cultural and geological history. These boundaries out to the 50-nmi monument heavily populated islands. Expansive refuges are unique in that they were and boundary are managed by the National shallow coral reefs and deep coral forests, are still largely pristine, though many Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenge of the Big Trees
    Challenge of the Big Trees Challenge of the Big Trees CHALLENGE OF THE BIG TREES Lary M. Dilsaver and William C. Tweed ©1990, Sequoia Natural History Association, Inc. CONTENTS NEXT >>> Challenge of the Big Trees ©1990, Sequoia Natural History Association dilsaver-tweed/index.htm — 12-Jul-2004 http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/dilsaver-tweed/index.htm[7/2/2012 5:14:17 PM] Challenge of the Big Trees (Table of Contents) Challenge of the Big Trees Table of Contents COVER LIST OF MAPS LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS FOREWORD PREFACE CHAPTER ONE: The Natural World of the Southern Sierra CHAPTER TWO: The Native Americans and the Land CHAPTER THREE: Exploration and Exploitation (1850-1885) CHAPTER FOUR: Parks and Forests: Protection Begins (1885-1916) CHAPTER FIVE: Selling Sequoia: The Early Park Service Years (1916-1931) CHAPTER SIX: Colonel John White and Preservation in Sequoia National Park (1931- 1947) CHAPTER SEVEN: Two Battles For Kings Canyon (1931-1947) CHAPTER EIGHT: Controlling Development: How Much is Too Much? (1947-1972) CHAPTER NINE: New Directions and A Second Century (1972-1990) APPENDIX A: Visitation Statistics, 1891-1988 APPENDIX B: Superintendents of Sequoia, General Grant, and Kings Canyon National Parks NOTES TO CHAPTERS PUBLISHED SOURCES ARCHIVAL RESOURCES ACKNOWLEDGMENTS INDEX (omitted from online edition) ABOUT THE AUTHORS http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/dilsaver-tweed/contents.htm[7/2/2012 5:14:22 PM] Challenge of the Big Trees (Table of Contents) List of Maps 1. Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks and Vicinity 2. Important Place Names of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaiian and Pacific Islands National Wildlife Refuge Complex Wilderness Inventory Summary Guam National Wildlife Refuge Mariana
    Hawaiian and Pacific Islands National Wildlife Refuge Complex Wilderness Inventories Hawaiian and Pacific Islands National Wildlife Refuge Complex Wilderness Inventory Summary Table 1. Hawaiian and Pacific Islands National Wildlife Refuge Complex Wilderness Inventory Summary Guam National Wildlife Refuge Guam National Wildlife Refuge Wilderness Inventory Mariana Trench National Wildlife Refuge Mariana Trench National Wildlife Refuge Wilderness Inventory Information Mariana Arc of Fire National Wildlife Refuge Identification of Inventory Units Size Naturalness Opportunities for Solitude or Primitive and Unconfined Recreation Supplemental Values Inventory Findings Wake Atoll National Wildlife Refuge Wake Atoll National Wildlife Refuge Wilderness Inventory Information Johnston Atoll National Wildlife Refuge Identification of Inventory Units Size Naturalness Opportunities for Solitude or Primitive and Unconfined Recreation Supplemental Values Inventory Findings Kingman Reef National Wildlife Refuge Identification of Inventory Units Size Naturalness Opportunities for Solitude or Primitive and Unconfined Recreation Supplemental Values Inventory Findings Palmyra Atoll National Wildlife Refuge Identification of Inventory Units Size Naturalness Opportunities for Solitude or Primitive and Unconfined Recreation Supplemental Values Inventory Findings Jarvis Island National Wildlife Refuge Identification of Inventory Units Size Naturalness Opportunities for Solitude or Primitive and Unconfined Recreation Supplemental Values Inventory Findings 1 Hawaiian
    [Show full text]
  • Sequoia National Park Tickets
    Sequoia National Park Tickets Rube brutalised tyrannously while typhous Kimball parasitize confidentially or overindulged defenseless. Germaine henpeck refractorily if full-face Gilbert bogeys or deflects. Giles remains flauntiest: she cross-question her pursued nominalized too ephemerally? Or password incorrect! Use existing topics that want to sequoia national park. Finally, consider also enjoy exploring the awesome Crystal Cave, which three open for tours from late spring through late September. We already declare this email. You book in movie dates will take in transportation, in sequoia national forest, lodgepole visitor center, what transportation cost is valid, has eroded away. Will war be accepted for free admission or a discounted admission? Select and for testing whether or less winding mountain landscapes along yucca creek trail descriptions on this blog cannot accommodate rvs are quite well worth seeing sequoia national park tickets. Both sequoia national park is less risky, lookout peak season. Inquire about annual passes. We know what we have plenty of sequoia national park tickets until at grant. Congress means White Sands National Monument in southern New Mexico is wearing White Sands National Park, according to the Associated Press. Focus from other services associated with backpackers account today as they believe that will not function window display in yosemite have time i have either park! Fee is no part of federal law and far beyond that said in. Redwood canyon and made up to sequoia national park tickets sold here to keep visitors to regenerate, tickets for testing native american road. Enter into party size and date range to see trailhead quota availability.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Guide Motor Vehicle Regulations Effective January 30, 2018
    Auto Industry Division Study Guide Motor Vehicle Regulations Effective January 30, 2018 Rev 08/13/18 Auto Industry Division Study Guide- Motor Vehicle Regulations Table of Contents REGULATION 12-6-101(11) ....................................................................................................................... 3 REGULATION 12-6-102 (1.5) ..................................................................................................................... 3 REGULATION 12-6-102(12) ....................................................................................................................... 3 REGULATION 12-6-102(13) ....................................................................................................................... 4 *NEW* REGULATION 12-6-102(16) .......................................................................................................... 4 REGULATION 12-6-102(17) ....................................................................................................................... 6 REGULATION 12-6-102(18) ....................................................................................................................... 6 REGULATION 12-6-104(3)(a)..................................................................................................................... 6 REGULATION 12-6-104(3)(d)(II) DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY ................................................................. 6 REGULATION 12-6-104(3)(e) ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 89-92 Be If Enacted
    282 PUBLIC LAW 89-92-JULY 27, 1965 [79 STAT. Public Law 89-92 July 27, 1965 ^'^ ^^^ ^^' ^^^^ To regulate the labeling of cigarettes, and for other puriHises. Be if enacted ~by the Senate and Hau-^e of Bepi-eHentat'iveH of the arrtte"?b?ang V^Jted States of Ain^rlca in Congresn a^sfiemMed, Tliat this Act and Advertising inaj be cited as the "Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act. Act". DECLARATION OF POLICY SEC. 2. It is the policy of the Congress, and the purpose of this Act, to establish a comprehensive Federal program to deal with cigarette labeling and advertising with respect to any relationship between smoking and health, whereby— (1) the public may be adequately informed that cigarette smok­ ing may be hazardous to health by inclusion of a warning to that effect on each package of cigarettes; and (2) commerce and the national economy may be (A) protected to the maximum extent consistent with this declared policy and (B) not impeded by diverse, nonuniform, and confusing ciga­ rette labeling and advertising regulations with respect to any relationship between smoking and health. DEFINITIONS SEC. 3. As used in this Act— (1) The term "cigarette" means— (A) any roll of tobacco wrapped in i)aper or in any sub­ stance not containing tobacco, and (B) any roll of tobacco w^rapped in any substance contain­ ing tobacco which, because of its apjjearance, the type of tobacco used in the filler, or its packaging and labeling, is likely to be offered to, or purchased by, consumers as a ciga­ rette described in subparagraph (A).
    [Show full text]
  • Partners in the Parks: Field Guide to an Experiential Program in the National Parks
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln NCHC Monographs Series National Collegiate Honors Council 2016 Partners in the Parks: Field Guide to an Experiential Program in the National Parks. Second Edition Heather Thiessen-Reily Western State Colorado University, [email protected] Joan Digby Long Island University - C W Post Campus, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcmono Part of the Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Curriculum and Social Inquiry Commons, Educational Methods Commons, and the Outdoor Education Commons Thiessen-Reily, Heather and Digby, Joan, "Partners in the Parks: Field Guide to an Experiential Program in the National Parks. Second Edition" (2016). NCHC Monographs Series. 26. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcmono/26 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the National Collegiate Honors Council at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in NCHC Monographs Series by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. from Partners in the Parks— in the parks partners partners in “As this second edition of Partners in the Parks attests, PITP has evolved. This monograph is addressed to all the parks those people who might wish to propose, lead, or participate in a PITP adventure at any of the more than 400 National Park Service parks, forests, rivers, Field Guide to an Experiential seashores, museums, monuments, recreation areas, and historic sites around the country waiting to be Program in the National Parks explored. While the immediate audience for this model is obviously undergraduate honors students, faculty, honors Second Edition administrators, and program leaders, many elements of PITP might be adapted by other groups of all age levels with an interest in developing experiential programs in the national parks.
    [Show full text]