<<

Posted on Authorea 13 Oct 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.160257635.51966646/v1 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. iigMei Qiming Vertical Community Forest the of Shape Structure Light How Receptor into Light Insights Blue Cryptochrome: on Based Analysis Structure Phylogenetic ogLnCao Hong-Lin shape-the-vertical-structure-of-forest-community structure-analysis-based-on-blue-light-receptor-cryptochrome-insights-into-how-light- Manuscript.pdf similar to adapted and file coexist Hosted to tended of values related NTI phylogenetically and that in succession layers, role suggesting canopy as important zero, upper overdispersion conditions. more in above light more a clustering were played more became layers filtering were community canopy environmental patterns all and phylogenetic increased Furthermore, values of co-occur different NTI assembly. to structure and community quite tended NRI phylogenetic the showed both species the Also, CRY closely-related adaptation. that that phylogenetic local found indicating proceeds; in We patterns, time, of structure (NTI). of the system phylogenetic assembly consistent sensing index community sequences through displayed light taxon of habitats of by all Patterns evolution nearest a convergent forest results, a and barcoding barcodes. in subtropical suggesting DNA (NRI) DNA to species south of compared index of the as results relatedness structure coexistence of the phylogenetic net compared the structure the by and influences phylogenetic on (CRY) estimated evolution community focused cryptochrome was genes’ none analyzed receptor light how far, we blue So reflects study, plant community. which this forest receptors, In a light shapes community. plant which of factor pattern environmental important phylogenetic an is variability Light-regime Abstract 2020 13, October 1 ot hn oaia adn hns cdm fSciences of Academy Chinese Garden, Botanical China South 1 uY Lian Ju-Yu , 1 n a-u Ye Wan-Hui and , vial at available 1 u Wang Yue , https://authorea.com/users/366771/articles/486413-phylogenetic- 1 1 egLi Meng , 1 1 uu Gui Xujun , 1 hn-egWang Zheng-Feng , 1 , Posted on Authorea 13 Oct 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.160257635.51966646/v1 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. (a)

Westing (m)

0 100 200 300 400 500 0 0.62 1.00 0.65 1.00 100

0.97 1.00

0.99 0.98 0.99 1.00 10

0.98 Southing (m) 0.95

0.64 0.90 1.00 200

0.55 0.86

1.00 0.80 1.00

0.86 1.00 1.00 (a) 1.00 300 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 400 Habitat High slope Ridge High valley Low slope Low valley 1.00 1.00 Monocots Proteales 2 (b) 10 (b) Myrtales Laurales Proteales Proteales Ericales Aquifoliales Fagales Malpighiales Oxalidales Sapindales Monocots Magnoliales Apiales Gentianales Saxifragales Rosales Fabales Malvales Posted on Authorea 13 Oct 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.160257635.51966646/v1 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. −2.5 0.0 2.5 5.0 −2 −1 0 NTI 1 2 3 NRI −1 0 NRI 1 2 HG* c HG* b,c HS c HS 2005* a (d) (a) LS* b LS* Habitat Habitat a c RT RT a,b 2010* Year a V* V* c −2.5 0.0 2.5 5.0 2015* −2 −1 0 NTI 1 2 3 NRI b,c a HG* HG b b a HS* c HS b,c a a −1 LS* b LS* Habitat 0 1 2 (e) (b) NTI Habitat a,b a a 3 c RT* RT a c 2005* b a V* V* a b 2010* −2.5 0.0 2.5 5.0 −2 −1 Year 0 NTI 1 2 3 NRI a HG* b HG* b b,c a HS* HS* a,b 2015* a b LS* LS* Habitat (f) (c) Habitat b a c RT RT* a Method b a V* V* c CRY Barcode Method CRY Barcode Posted on Authorea 13 Oct 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.160257635.51966646/v1 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. −2.5 0.0 2.5 −2 NTI0 2 NRI # ES* ES* # # (d) (a) Succession Succession # LS* LS # # −2.5 0.0 2.5 −2 NTI0 2 NRI # ES* ES* # # Succession Succession (e) (b) # 4 LS* LS* # # −2.5 0.0 2.5 −2 NTI0 2 NRI # ES* ES* # # Succession Succession (f) (c) # LS* LS* # # Method CRY Barcode Posted on Authorea 13 Oct 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.160257635.51966646/v1 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. −2 −4 −2 0 2 4 NTI 0 2 NRI a b Sh* Sh* b b a b Un Un* a a (c) (a) Layer Layer a,b c Ca Ca* a b b c Em* Em* a c −2 −4 −2 0 2 4 NTI 0 2 NRI 5 a a Sh* Sh* c a,b b Un* Un* b (d) (b) Layer Layer a,b b Ca Ca* b b b Em* Em* a Method CRY Barcode