The Vilification of Mary Tudor: Religion, Politics, and Propaganda in Sixteenth-Century England

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Vilification of Mary Tudor: Religion, Politics, and Propaganda in Sixteenth-Century England The Vilification of Mary Tudor: Religion, Politics, and Propaganda in Sixteenth-Century England by Lorin Scott, BA Thesis In History Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Approved Dr. Abigail Swingen Chair of Committee Dr. Stefano D’Amico Dr. Emily Skidmore Mark Sheridan Dean of the Graduate School May, 2014 Copyright 2014, Lorin Scott ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to first and foremost thank my thesis advisor, Dr. Abigail Swingen, for all of her help, guidance, and the encouragement that she has provided me over the past two years. She was a constant source of wise counsel and patiently waded through draft after draft of my work. I truly feel that Dr. Swingen has helped me become a better historian and writer than I could have ever hoped for. I would also like to thank Dr. Stefano D’Amico and Dr. Emily Skidmore for their continual support, encouragement, and the guidance that they have graciously given me with over the past three years. I would further like to thank Dr. Richard Verrone for being an amazing advisor and friend to me during my years at Texas Tech. Dr. Verrone constantly offered me words of encouragement and gave me the confidence I needed to push through the pressures and difficulties of graduate school. Finally, I would like to thank the entire Texas Tech history department for providing me with such an amazing experience as I worked on my graduate degree. Between the funding to do research in London and the faculty’s constant willingness to stretch, train, and encourage my abilities as a historian, the Texas Tech history department has provided me with invaluable experiences and education. Finally, I would like to thank my family for their constant encouragement and support for me all throughout my thesis writing and graduate experiences. Specifically, I want to thank you my husband, Dr. Phillip Scott, for always having faith in me and my abilities as a historian. I appreciate you and your constant words of encouragement and love more than you can know. Lastly, I want to thank my mom, Robyn Lowrie, for always believing in me and always encouraging me to follow my dreams. You are the main reason that I am historian! Furthermore, thank you for editing my thesis over and over again over the past two years. ii Texas Tech University, Lorin Scott, May 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................... ii ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES ..............................................................................................v I. INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................1 Historical Background .....................................................................................10 II. THE HEALER AND THE HANDMAIDEN: MARY'S CATHOLIC PROPAGANDA CAMPAIGN 1553-155…………………..………………….198 III. THE HABSBURG MARRIAGE AND ENGLISH REACTION: THE MARIAN PROPAGANDA CAMPAIGN FOR HABSBURG AND ENGLISH RECONCILIATION…..………………………………………...….56 Habsburg Marriage and Marian Policy…….………………………………....56 Marian Propaganda Campaign for the Habsburg Marriage…………...…..…68 The Collapse of the Marian Propaganda Campaign………………...…….....78 IV. THE TRUMPETS AGAINST THE MONSTROUS REGIMENT OF "BLOODY MARY": PROTESTANT REACTIONS TO THE REIGN OF MARY 1553-1570………………………………………………..………....89 The Creation of the "Cruel Tyrant" and the beginning foundations of the idea of "Bloody Mary"………………………………………………..…106 V. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………...136 BIBLIOGRAPHY ..........................................................................................…146 iii Texas Tech University, Lorin Scott, May 2014 ABSTRACT Mary Tudor, the first reigning queen of England, has been one of the most despised rulers in English history. She was the Catholic queen whose policy of burning Protestant heretics earned her the regrettable moniker, “Bloody Mary.” The purpose of my thesis is to examine the reign of Mary I and the years preceding it to understand the origins of the “Bloody Mary” image that has dominated English historical tradition over the past four centuries. In the early stages of her reign, Mary and her advisors created a propaganda campaign by distributing images of her as a benevolent Catholic queen and loving Habsburg wife in order to garner popular support and ease fears over the Catholic religious policies she set into motion. I will argue that it was these images, created by the Marian government, that were used and manipulated by Mary’s Protestant adversaries to delegitimize her authority and villianize her reign in the eyes of her English subjects. This negative Protestant propaganda campaign in conjunction with Mary’s unpopular religious policies, thus set into motion the creation of the “Bloody Mary” image that began to spread through seventeenth-century Protestant England and into the twenty-first century. iv Texas Tech University, Lorin Scott, May 2014 LIST OF FIGURES 1 “Certain prayers to be used by the quenes heignes in the consecreation of the crampe rynges” .............................................54 2 “Mary Tudor curing the king’s evil”……………………………...54 3 Richard Beeard’s “A Godly Psalme of Marye Queene which brought us comfort al, through God, whom wee of dewtye prayse.” …………………………………………………………..55 4 John Heywood’s “A Spider and the Flie”………………………..55 5 Easter Plea Rolls 4 & 5 Philip & Mary Easter……………………87 6a Great Seal of Philip and Mary…………………………………….87 6b A detailed drawing of the Great Seal……………………………..87 7 Coins of Mary I and Philip………………………………………..88 8 Hans Eworth. Portrait of King Felipe II. Of Spain……………….88 9 “About the Origin of Monks. About the Origin of the Antichrist…………………………………………………………133 10 “Behold here a brief abstract of all genealogie of all the Kynges of England……………………………………………….133 11 John Foxe. “A Lamentable Spectacle of three women, with a sely infant brasting out of the Mothers wombe, being first taken out of the fire, and cast in agayne, and so all burned together in the Isle of Guernsey”…………………………………134 v Texas Tech University, Lorin Scott, May 2014 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION According to English cultural and historical tradition, Mary I is perceived to be a villainous queen whose torture and persecution of English Protestants earned her the regrettable nickname “Bloody Mary.” From the time of her reign (1553-1558), Mary’s supporters and opponents characterized her between the extremes of the biblical heroine Deborah, who redeemed the country from religious destruction, and the villain Jezebel, who persecuted God’s faithful subjects. Until very recently, the prevailing image of Mary Tudor was as a cruel, tyrannical, and hysterical woman whose premature death saved England from Catholic and Spanish oppression. Over the centuries, the mutation of Mary’s character and reputation became a tool in the hands of Protestant historians who portrayed her as the antithesis of the Virgin Queen, Elizabeth I, and the subsequent rise of England’s glory as a world power in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. This traditional image of Mary Tudor even infiltrates popular culture today. Film director Shekhar Kapur’s interpretation in his movie, Elizabeth (1998) portrays Mary as an embittered and hysterical woman whose zeal for persecuting Protestants is depicted in the gruesome scenes of three individuals burning at the stake. This image was further perpetuated in 2010 when the popular tourist attraction, the London Dungeon, included the vile Queen Mary I among England’s most infamous and bloody scoundrels, such as Jack the Ripper, Sweeney Todd, and Guy Fawkes. In this exhibit, patrons were visually transported back to 1556 London to witness “Bloody Mary” fantastically condemning Protestants to death as well as to experience the sights, screams and stench of a fiery 1 Texas Tech University, Lorin Scott, May 2014 execution of helpless “heretics” burning alive. These haunting portrayals of Mary Tudor that dominate popular culture are the result of four centuries of anti-Catholic prejudice. In my thesis, I aim to examine how political propaganda during the 1550s and 1560s deleteriously contributed to the vilification of Mary I. While the moniker “Bloody Mary” was not coined until the latter seventeenth century,1 I argue that the origins of the degradation of Mary’s reputation was a result of the chaotic and divisive religious situation in England from the beginning of her reign, and her inability to transcend these divisions to unify her people under one religion and one English queen. I will argue that this failure was further exacerbated by her decision to marry Philip II of Spain, her alignment with the Roman Catholic Church, and later with Elizabeth I’s institutionalization of Protestantism in England. Rather than attempting to restore Mary Tudor’s reputation and reign, I will reevaluate the ways in which she came to be understood as a cruel and tyrannical queen and how this image has dominated English history and popular culture over the past four centuries. I will specifically evaluate Mary’s reign from 1553 to 1558 and the decade following her death to trace the evolution of her image from a Catholic savior to a cruel despot. I will argue that Mary and her advisors diligently worked to bind her rule and royal representation with images of Catholicism and the Spanish Habsburgs in order
Recommended publications
  • Vagrants and Vagrancy in England, 1485-1553
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1986 Basilisks of the Commonwealth: Vagrants and Vagrancy in England, 1485-1553 Christopher Thomas Daly College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Daly, Christopher Thomas, "Basilisks of the Commonwealth: Vagrants and Vagrancy in England, 1485-1553" (1986). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625366. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-y42p-8r81 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BASILISKS OF THE COMMONWEALTH: Vagrants and Vagrancy in England, 1485-1553 A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts fcy Christopher T. Daly 1986 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts . s F J i z L s _____________ Author Approved, August 1986 James L. Axtell Dale E. Hoak JamesEL McCord, IjrT DEDICATION To my brother, grandmother, mother and father, with love and respect. iii TABLE OE CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................. v ABSTRACT.......................................... vi INTRODUCTION ...................................... 2 CHAPTER I. THE PROBLEM OE VAGRANCY AND GOVERNMENTAL RESPONSES TO IT, 1485-1553 7 CHAPTER II.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/28/2021 10:23:11PM Via Free Access Notes to Chapter 1 671
    Notes 1 Introduction. Fall and Redemption: The Divine Artist 1 Émile Verhaeren, “La place de James Ensor Michelangelo, 3: 1386–98; Summers, Michelangelo dans l’art contemporain,” in Verhaeren, James and the Language of Art, 238–39. Ensor, 98: “À toutes les périodes de l’histoire, 11 Sulzberger, “Les modèles italiens,” 257–64. ces influences de peuple à peuple et d’école à 12 Siena, Church of the Carmines, oil on panel, école se sont produites. Jadis l’Italie dominait 348 × 225 cm; Sanminiatelli, Domenico profondément les Floris, les Vaenius et les de Vos. Beccafumi, 101–02, no. 43. Tous pourtant ont trouvé place chez nous, dans 13 E.g., Bhabha, Location of Culture; Burke, Cultural notre école septentrionale. Plus tard, Pierre- Hybridity; Burke, Hybrid Renaissance; Canclini, Paul Rubens s’en fut à son tour là-bas; il revint Hybrid Cultures; Spivak, An Aesthetic Education. italianisé, mais ce fut pour renouveler tout l’art See also the overview of Mabardi, “Encounters of flamand.” a Heterogeneous Kind,” 1–20. 2 For an overview of scholarship on the painting, 14 Kim, The Traveling Artist, 48, 133–35; Payne, see the entry by Carl Van de Velde in Fabri and “Mescolare,” 273–94. Van Hout, From Quinten Metsys, 99–104, no. 3. 15 In fact, Vasari also uses the term pejoratively to The church received cathedral status in 1559, as refer to German art (opera tedesca) and to “bar- discussed in Chapter Nine. barous” art that appears to be a bad assemblage 3 Silver, The Paintings of Quinten Massys, 204–05, of components; see Payne, “Mescolare,” 290–91.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentación De Powerpoint
    Painted by Titian 1551 PHILIP II KING OF SPAIN “ THE PRUDENT” Signature CONTENT AND LANGUAGE INTEGRATED LEARNING UNIT (UNIDAD DIDÁCTICA CLIL) 2017/18 HISTORY lrs Lourdes Ruiz Juana of Castile Philip “The Handsome” Maria of Aragon. Manuel I of Portugal 3rd DAUGTHER OF of Austria 4TH DAUGTHER OF Isabel and Ferdinand Isabel and Ferdinand Charles I of Spain Isabella of Portugal nd Born: 21 May 1527 1st wife 2 wife 3rd wife 4th wife Died: 13 September 1598 Maria Manuela Mary I of England Elizabeth Anna of Austria Philip II of Spain of Portugal “Bloody Mary” of Valois Spain, the Netherlands, Italian Territories & The Spanish Empire lrs 1527: Philip II of Spain was born in Palacio de Pimentel, Valladolid, which was the capital of the Spanish empire. In June 1561, Philip moved his court to Madrid making it the new capital city. Philip was a studious young boy, he learnt Spanish, Portuguese and Latin. 'The Baptism of Philip II' in Valladolid. He enjoyed hunting and sports as well as music. Historical ceiling preserved in Palacio de Pimentel (Valladolid) Also, he was trained in warfare by the . court [kɔːt] N corte Duke of Alba hunting [ˈhʌntɪŋ] N caza, cacería lrs warfare [ˈwɔːfɛər] N guerra, artes militares Look at this map. In 1554-55, Philip’s father, Charles I of Spain and Holy Roman Emperor abdicated in favour of his son Philip and his brother Ferdinand. Charles left all the territories in ORANGE to his son. After different battles and expeditions, Philip’s Empire would include all the territories in GREEN. That is, he took control of Portugal and its colonies in America, Africa and Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 SPSA Conference Program
    DETAILED PROGRAM JANUARY 12–14, 2017 NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA Sponsored by The University of Chicago Press, publishers of the Journal of Politics 1 www.spsa.net 2 Southern Political Science Association • 88th Annual Conference • January 12–14, 2017 • New Orleans Table of Contents Plenary Events and Sessions 7 – 11 Hotel Maps 12 – 15 Things To Do In The Central Business District 16 – 17 Committees 2015 – 2016 18 – 19 Award Winners 25 – 27 Professional Development 28 Authors Meet Critics 28 Round Tables 29 Mini-Conferences 30 – 35 2016 Program Committee 36 – 37 Conference Overview 38 – 55 Panels Listings 56 – 235 Thursday 56 – 112 Friday 113 – 158 Saturday 159 – 213 Participant Index 214 – 225 2017 Program Committee 226 – 227 3 88th Annual Conference Officers and Staff 2016-2017 President William G. Jacoby, Michigan State University President Elect Judith Baer, Texas A&M University Vice President Jeff Gill, Washington University in St.Louis Vice President Elect Saundra Schneider, Michigan State University 2019 President David Lewis, Vanderbilt University Executive Director Robert Howard, Georgia State University Secretary Lee Walker, University of North Texas Treasurer Sue Tolleson-Rinehart, University of North Carolina Past President Ann Bowman, Texas A&M University Executive Council Jasmine Farrier, University of Louisville Pearl Ford Dowe, University of Arkansas Susan Haire, University of Georgia D. Sunshine Hillygus, Duke University Cherie Maestas, Florida State University Seth McKee, Texas Tech University D’Andra Orey, Jackson State University Kirk Randazzo, University of South Carolina Mary Stegmaier, University of Missouri Journal of Politics Editors Jeffery A. Jenkins, University of Virginia, Editor-in Chief Elisabeth Ellis, University of Otago Sean Gailmard, University of California, Berkeley Lanny Martin, Rice University Jennifer L.
    [Show full text]
  • Queen Mary I
    Queen Mary I Queen Mary I of England, also known as Mary Tudor, was one of the five monarchs from the famous Tudor family. Early Life Mary was born on 18th February 1516. She was the daughter of King Henry VIII and his first wife, Catherine of Aragon. Mary was a very clever child and was able to speak, read and write in many languages including Latin and Spanish. She was also very religious like her mother and followed the Catholic faith. In 1533, Henry decided to divorce Catherine as he was desperate for a son to be his heir. Mary was removed from her place in line to the throne, became known as ‘The Lady Mary’ rather than ‘Princess Mary’ and sent away from court. She was not allowed any contact with her mother as she would not accept her father’s new wife, Anne Boleyn, as queen. This hurt her relationship with her father and they did not speak for three years. Henry’s third wife, Jane, tried to make peace between Mary and her father. Mary agreed to the king’s request to recognise him as the head of the church and was reunited with her father in 1536. After Jane died, Henry married another three times. His final wife, Catherine Parr, persuaded the king to return Mary and Elizabeth to the line of succession in 1544. In 1547, Henry died and Mary’s half-brother Edward became king. During his reign, Mary spent most of her time away from court as she disagreed with laws he had passed.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert D. Hawkins
    LEX OR A NDI LEX CREDENDI THE CON F ESSION al INDI ff ERENCE TO AL TITUDE Robert D. Hawkins t astounds me that, in the twenty-two years I have shared Catholics, as the Ritualists were known, formed the Church Iresponsibility for the liturgical formation of seminarians, of England Protection Society (1859), renamed the English I have heard Lutherans invoke the terms “high church” Church Union (1860), to challenge the authority of English and “low church” as if they actually describe with clar- civil law to determine ecclesiastical and liturgical practice.1 ity ministerial positions regarding worship. It is assumed The Church Association (1865) was formed to prosecute in that I am “high church” because I teach worship and know civil court the “catholic innovations.” Five Anglo-Catholic how to fire up a censer. On occasion I hear acquaintances priests were jailed following the 1874 enactment of the mutter vituperatively about “low church” types, apparently Public Worship Regulation Act for refusing to abide by civil ecclesiological life forms not far removed from amoebae. court injunctions regarding liturgical practices. Such prac- On the other hand, a history of the South Carolina Synod tices included the use of altar crosses, candlesticks, stoles included a passing remark about liturgical matters which with embroidered crosses, bowing, genuflecting, or the use historically had been looked upon in the region with no lit- of the sign of the cross in blessing their congregations.2 tle suspicion. It was feared upon my appointment, I sense, For readers whose ecclesiological sense is formed by that my supposed “high churchmanship” would distract notions about the separation of church and state, such the seminarians from the rigors of pastoral ministry into prosecution seems mind-boggling, if not ludicrous.
    [Show full text]
  • Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Biographical Sources for Archbishops of Canterbury from 1052 to the Present Day
    Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Biographical Sources for Archbishops of Canterbury from 1052 to the Present Day 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 2 Abbreviations Used ....................................................................................................... 4 3 Archbishops of Canterbury 1052- .................................................................................. 5 Stigand (1052-70) .............................................................................................................. 5 Lanfranc (1070-89) ............................................................................................................ 5 Anselm (1093-1109) .......................................................................................................... 5 Ralph d’Escures (1114-22) ................................................................................................ 5 William de Corbeil (1123-36) ............................................................................................. 5 Theobold of Bec (1139-61) ................................................................................................ 5 Thomas Becket (1162-70) ................................................................................................. 6 Richard of Dover (1174-84) ............................................................................................... 6 Baldwin (1184-90) ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Form Foreign Policy Took- Somerset and His Aims: Powers Change? Sought to Continue War with Scotland, in Hope of a Marriage Between Edward and Mary, Queen of Scots
    Themes: How did relations with foreign Form foreign policy took- Somerset and his aims: powers change? Sought to continue war with Scotland, in hope of a marriage between Edward and Mary, Queen of Scots. Charles V up to 1551: The campaign against the Scots had been conducted by Somerset from 1544. Charles V unchallenged position in The ‘auld alliance’ between Franc and Scotland remained, and English fears would continue to be west since death of Francis I in dominated by the prospect of facing war on two fronts. 1547. Somerset defeated Scots at Battle of Pinkie in September 1547. Too expensive to garrison 25 border Charles won victory against forts (£200,000 a year) and failed to prevent French from relieving Edinburgh with 10,000 troops. Protestant princes of Germany at In July 1548, the French took Mary to France and married her to French heir. Battle of Muhlberg, 1547. 1549- England threatened with a French invasion. France declares war on England. August- French Ottomans turned attention to attacked Boulogne. attacking Persia. 1549- ratified the Anglo-Imperial alliance with Charles V, which was a show of friendship. Charles V from 1551-1555: October 1549- Somerset fell from power. In the west, Henry II captured Imperial towns of Metz, Toul and Verdun and attacked Charles in the Form foreign policy-Northumberland and his aims: Netherlands. 1550- negotiated a settlement with French. Treaty of In Central Europe, German princes Somerset and Boulogne. Ended war, Boulogne returned in exchange for had allied with Henry II and drove Northumberland 400,000 crowns. England pulled troops out of Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • DISSERTATION-Submission Reformatted
    The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 By Robert Lee Harkins A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor David Bates Fall 2013 © Robert Lee Harkins 2013 All Rights Reserved 1 Abstract The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 by Robert Lee Harkins Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair This study examines the problem of religious and political obedience in early modern England. Drawing upon extensive manuscript research, it focuses on the reign of Mary I (1553-1558), when the official return to Roman Catholicism was accompanied by the prosecution of Protestants for heresy, and the reign of Elizabeth I (1558-1603), when the state religion again shifted to Protestantism. I argue that the cognitive dissonance created by these seesaw changes of official doctrine necessitated a society in which religious mutability became standard operating procedure. For most early modern men and women it was impossible to navigate between the competing and contradictory dictates of Tudor religion and politics without conforming, dissimulating, or changing important points of conscience and belief. Although early modern theologians and polemicists widely declared religious conformists to be shameless apostates, when we examine specific cases in context it becomes apparent that most individuals found ways to positively rationalize and justify their respective actions. This fraught history continued to have long-term effects on England’s religious, political, and intellectual culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Adoption Items Within Worcester Cathedral Adopt a Window
    Catalogue of Adoption Items within Worcester Cathedral Adopt a Window The cloister Windows were created between 1916 and 1999 with various artists producing these wonderful pictures. The decision was made to commission a contemplated series of historical Windows, acting both as a history of the English Church and as personal memorials. By adopting your favourite character, event or landscape as shown in the stained glass, you are helping support Worcester Cathedral in keeping its fabric conserved and open for all to see. A £25 example Examples of the types of small decorative panel, there are 13 within each Window. A £50 example Lindisfarne The Armada A £100 example A £200 example St Wulfstan William Caxton Chaucer William Shakespeare Full Catalogue of Cloister Windows Name Location Price Code 13 small decorative pieces East Walk Window 1 £25 CW1 Angel violinist East Walk Window 1 £50 CW2 Angel organist East Walk Window 1 £50 CW3 Angel harpist East Walk Window 1 £50 CW4 Angel singing East Walk Window 1 £50 CW5 Benedictine monk writing East Walk Window 1 £50 CW6 Benedictine monk preaching East Walk Window 1 £50 CW7 Benedictine monk singing East Walk Window 1 £50 CW8 Benedictine monk East Walk Window 1 £50 CW9 stonemason Angel carrying dates 680-743- East Walk Window 1 £50 CW10 983 Angel carrying dates 1089- East Walk Window 1 £50 CW11 1218 Christ and the Blessed Virgin, East Walk Window 1 £100 CW12 to whom this Cathedral is dedicated St Peter, to whom the first East Walk Window 1 £100 CW13 Cathedral was dedicated St Oswald, bishop 961-992,
    [Show full text]
  • Melanchthon Versus Luther: the Contemporary Struggle
    CONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL QUARTERLY Volume 44, Numbers 2-3 --- - - - JULY 1980 Can the Lutheran Confessions Have Any Meaning 450 Years Later?.................... Robert D. Preus 104 Augustana VII and the Eclipse of Ecumenism ....................................... Sieg bert W. Becker 108 Melancht hon versus Luther: The Contemporary Struggle ......................... Bengt Hagglund 123 In-. Response to Bengt Hagglund: The importance of Epistemology for Luther's and Melanchthon's Theology .............. Wilbert H. Rosin 134 Did Luther and Melanchthon Agree on the Real Presence?.. ....................................... David P. Scaer 14 1 Luther and Melanchthon in America ................................................ C. George Fry 148 Luther's Contribution to the Augsburg Confession .............................................. Eugene F. Klug 155 Fanaticism as a Theological Category in the Lutheran Confessions ............................... Paul L. Maier 173 Homiletical Studies 182 Melanchthon versus Luther: the Contemporary Struggle Bengt Hagglund Luther and Melanchthon in Modern Research In many churches in Scandinavia or in Germany one will find two oil paintings of the same size and datingfrom the same time, representing Martin Luther and Philip Melanchthon, the two prime reformers of the Church. From the point of view of modern research it may seem strange that Melanchthon is placed on the same level as Luther, side by side with him, equal in importance and equally worth remembering as he. Their common achieve- ment was, above all, the renewal of the preaching of the Gospel, and therefore it is deserving t hat their portraits often are placed in the neighborhood of the pulpit. Such pairs of pictures were typical of the nineteenth-century view of Melanchthon and Luther as harmonious co-workers in the Reformation. These pic- tures were widely displayed not only in the churches, but also in many private homes in areas where the Reformation tradition was strong.
    [Show full text]
  • Foxes Book of Martyrs Select Narratives 1St Edition Free Download
    FREE FOXES BOOK OF MARTYRS SELECT NARRATIVES 1ST EDITION PDF John Foxe | 9780199236848 | | | | | Editions of Foxe's Book of Martyrs by John Foxe Please enter your email address associated with your Salem All-Pass account, then click Continue. We'll send you an email with steps on how to reset your password. Edited by William Byron Forbush This is a book that will never die -- one of the great English classics. Foxes Book of Martyrs Select Narratives 1st edition here in its most complete form, it brings to life the days when "a noble army, men and boys, the matron and the maid," "climbed the steep ascent of heaven, 'mid peril, toil, and pain. Even in our time it is still a living force. It is more than a record of persecution. It is an arsenal of controversy, a storehouse of romance, as well as a source of edification. Toggle navigation. Sign in. Password Assistance. Email address. Fox's Book of Martyrs. Share Tweet Save. John Fox's famous book detailing the lives, Foxes Book of Martyrs Select Narratives 1st edition and triumphant deaths of the early Christian and the Protestant Martyrs. James the Great. James the Less. Persecutions of the Christians in Persia. Persecutions Under the Arian Heretics. Persecution Under Julian the Apostate. Persecution of the Christians by the Goths and Vandals. The Last Roman "Triumph". Persecutions in the Eleventh Century. Papal Persecutions. Persecution of the Waldenses in France. Persecutions of the Albigenses. The Bartholomew Massacre at Paris, etc. Martyrdom of John Calas. An Account of the Inquisition. The Persecution of Dr.
    [Show full text]