Catalogue of Adoption Items Within Worcester Cathedral Adopt a Window
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
See of Dorchester Papers
From the Bishop of Oxford As a Diocese, we are prayerfully seeking the person whom God is calling to be the next Bishop of Dorchester, one of three Area bishops in the Diocese of Oxford. At the heart of our vision we discern a call to become a more Christ-like Church for the sake of God’s world: contemplative, compassionate and courageous. Most of all we are seeking a new Bishop for Dorchester who will seek to model those qualities and inspire the Church of England across the Dorchester Area to live them out in our daily lives. Our new Bishop will therefore be a person of prayer, immersed in the Scriptures and the Christian tradition, able to be at home with and to love the clergy, parishes and benefices in many different church traditions and many different social contexts. We are seeking a person able to watch over themselves in a demanding role and to model healthy and life-giving patterns of ministry. We want our new bishop to be an inspiring leader of worship, preacher and teacher in a range of different contexts and to be a pastor to the ministers of the Area. The Bishop of Dorchester leads a strong and able Area Team in taking forward the common vision of the Diocese of Oxford in the Dorchester Area. Full details of that process can be found in these pages and on our diocesan website. We are therefore seeking a Bishop who can demonstrate commitment and experience to our diocesan priorities. The Bishop of Dorchester holds a significant place in the civic life of the area: we are therefore seeking a bishop who is able to make a confident contribution to wider society beyond the life of the church in civil, ecumenical and interfaith engagement and who is able to live and articulate the Christian gospel in the public square. -
How Useful Are Episcopal Ordination Lists As a Source for Medieval English Monastic History?
Jnl of Ecclesiastical History, Vol. , No. , July . © Cambridge University Press doi:./S How Useful are Episcopal Ordination Lists as a Source for Medieval English Monastic History? by DAVID E. THORNTON Bilkent University, Ankara E-mail: [email protected] This article evaluates ordination lists preserved in bishops’ registers from late medieval England as evidence for the monastic orders, with special reference to religious houses in the diocese of Worcester, from to . By comparing almost , ordination records collected from registers from Worcester and neighbouring dioceses with ‘conven- tual’ lists, it is concluded that over per cent of monks and canons are not named in the extant ordination lists. Over half of these omissions are arguably due to structural gaps in the surviving ordination lists, but other, non-structural factors may also have contributed. ith the dispersal and destruction of the archives of religious houses following their dissolution in the late s, many docu- W ments that would otherwise facilitate the prosopographical study of the monastic orders in late medieval England and Wales have been irre- trievably lost. Surviving sources such as the profession and obituary lists from Christ Church Canterbury and the records of admissions in the BL = British Library, London; Bodl. Lib. = Bodleian Library, Oxford; BRUO = A. B. Emden, A biographical register of the University of Oxford to A.D. , Oxford –; CAP = Collectanea Anglo-Premonstratensia, London ; DKR = Annual report of the Deputy Keeper of the Public Records, London –; FOR = Faculty Office Register, –, ed. D. S. Chambers, Oxford ; GCL = Gloucester Cathedral Library; LP = J. S. Brewer and others, Letters and papers, foreign and domestic, of the reign of Henry VIII, London –; LPL = Lambeth Palace Library, London; MA = W. -
Bishop Gets All Steamed up to Celebrate Christmas
E I D S The year’s The films that IN news in sparked a Hunger review in 2012 4,5 p11 THE SUNDAY, JANUARY 6, 2013 No: 6158 www.churchnewspaper.com PRICE £1.35 1,70j US$2.20 CHURCH OF ENGLAND THE ORIGINAL CHURCH NEWSPAPER ESTABLISHED IN 1828 NEWSPAPER Group to tackle Synod impasse By Amaris Cole in the Synod and across the coming months we will find the February and again in May to lation is ready for introduction to Church. means to make that a reality”. come to a decision on the new the Synod there will be a separate THE WORKING group on the “That is why we will begin the The Bishop of Coventry added package of proposals which it decision about the membership of new legislative proposals on process with conversations at var- that he was also happy to have intends to bring to the Synod in the Steering Committee. women bishops was announced ious levels outside the legislative been asked to be a member of the July. This new Steering Committee, just before Christmas, containing process. newly announced group, working The brief includes facilitating which will, as usual, contain only only two members who voted “Many people on different sides towards the mandate given by the discussions with a wide range of those who support the legislation, against the previous legislation in of the debate have stated that they Archbishops’ Council. people across the Church in Feb- will have the responsibility for the November. want to find a way forward – my The working group’s task is to ruary. -
'Daylight Upon Magic': Stained Glass and the Victorian Monarchy
‘Daylight upon magic’: Stained Glass and the Victorian Monarchy Michael Ledger-Lomas If it help, through the senses, to bring home to the heart one more true idea of the glory and the tenderness of God, to stir up one deeper feeling of love, and thankfulness for an example so noble, to mould one life to more earnest walking after such a pattern of self-devotion, or to cast one gleam of brightness and hope over sorrow, by its witness to a continuous life in Christ, in and beyond the grave, their end will have been attained.1 Thus Canon Charles Leslie Courtenay (1816–1894) ended his account of the memorial window to the Prince Consort which the chapter of St George’s Chapel, Windsor had commissioned from George Gilbert Scott and Clayton and Bell. Erected in time for the wedding of Albert’s son the Prince of Wales in 1863, the window attempted to ‘combine the two ele- ments, the purely memorial and the purely religious […] giving to the strictly memorial part, a religious, whilst fully preserving in the strictly religious part, a memorial character’. For Courtenay, a former chaplain- in-ordinary to Queen Victoria, the window asserted the significance of the ‘domestic chapel of the Sovereign’s residence’ in the cult of the Prince Consort, even if Albert’s body had only briefly rested there before being moved to the private mausoleum Victoria was building at Frogmore. This window not only staked a claim but preached a sermon. It proclaimed the ‘Incarnation of the Son of God’, which is the ‘source of all human holiness, the security of the continuousness of life and love in Him, the assurance of the Communion of Saints’. -
Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Biographical Sources for Archbishops of Canterbury from 1052 to the Present Day
Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Biographical Sources for Archbishops of Canterbury from 1052 to the Present Day 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 2 Abbreviations Used ....................................................................................................... 4 3 Archbishops of Canterbury 1052- .................................................................................. 5 Stigand (1052-70) .............................................................................................................. 5 Lanfranc (1070-89) ............................................................................................................ 5 Anselm (1093-1109) .......................................................................................................... 5 Ralph d’Escures (1114-22) ................................................................................................ 5 William de Corbeil (1123-36) ............................................................................................. 5 Theobold of Bec (1139-61) ................................................................................................ 5 Thomas Becket (1162-70) ................................................................................................. 6 Richard of Dover (1174-84) ............................................................................................... 6 Baldwin (1184-90) ............................................................................................................ -
The Haden-Darwin-Wright Connection
1 The Haden-Darwin-Wright Connection (© Phil Tunaley). Introduction There was already a close relationship between the Haden and Wright families even when the original Haden family was based in Wednesbury, West Midlands, Staffordshire. Joseph Wright had painted a portrait of Thomas Haden with Thomas, born Wednesbury 1760, aged between 12 and 16 years and hence placing the year of the painting between 1772.and 1776. ("Portrait of Master Thomas Haden": http://www.artnet.com/artists/joseph-wright-of-derby/portrait-of- master-thomas-haden-YUYoRlyDiZsLjBzl0lWOvA2 ). So Thomas Haden's portrait would have been created 15- 20 years before Joseph Wright painted portraits of Mary Tunaley and the twins Ann and Sarah Haden (born 1788). Indeed the timing (1772-1776) of the painting of Thomas Haden as a boy by Joseph Wright indicate Wright being acquainted not only with the senior members of the Haden family (Thomas's father Joseph (1722-1799) and mother Ann (nee Bunn)) but also, as it transpires, with Thomas’s elder brother Alexander Bunn Haden (1752-1829). The aim of this article is to show how circumstances, some good, some bad, brought the Hadens into contact and later friendship with Erasmus Darwin and the Wright family. Thomas Haden, his father Joseph and elder brother Alexander Bunn Haden Thomas was the third son of Joseph Haden (b. 1722) originally of Old Swinford, Worcestershire and Anne (nee Bunn b. 1733) of Wednesbury, Staffordshire. Joseph’s 1751 marriage to Ann seems to have signalled a permanent move by Joseph to Wednesbury. And, according to records, the Haden-Bunn marriage took place at the then rebuilt (1741) Anglican Church of St. -
The Family of Hurd
A History and Genealogy of The Family of Hurd in the United States And a Partial History of the New England Families of Heard and Hord, including a Treatise on Nomenclature, Heraldry and Coat Ar- mour, and Ancestry By o Dena D. Hurd NEW YORK PRIVATELY PRINTED 1910 Copyrighl, 1910, by DENA D. HURD TO ALL WHO BEAR THE .ANCESTRY OF HURD LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Dena D. Hurd ....................................... Frontispiece FACING PAGE Ancestral Arms: Figs. 1 and 2.................................. 14 Figs. 3 and 4. 15 Hurd Arms. 21 Tomb of John Hurd, of Stratford................................ 29 Addison L. Hurd (1740), David Elisha Hurd (1738), Hannah E. Hurd (1741), Elisha Hills Hurd (827) and 1744, Horace N. Hurd (1743), John Henry Hurd (1744)................... 97 Rukard Hurd (907), Captain Ethan Osborn Hurd (1812). • . 101 Joy Hurd Family ......................................•.•..... 10\I Davis Hurd and Amanda (Turner) Hurd (1514). 124 Asahel Hurd (1515) . 126 Richard Hurd III (1716) . 134 John M. Hurd (2923), L. D. Hurd (2924), Thomas D and Anna Menge Hurd (1737), Jennie Hurd Merten (2927), Thomas J. Hurd (2930) ................................................ 136 Norabelle Hurd (2936), David E. (1738) and Anna D. F. Hurd, Myrtle Florence Hurd (2935), Elgin H. Hurd (2932) . 137 Alpheus E. (1742) and Ellen Palmer Hurd and Children ............. 141 Raymond V. Hurd (2955), John Henry Hurd Jr. (5194), John Henry Hurd (1744) ...· ....................................... 142 Justina Mattie Hurd (3067) .................................... 147 George Leon Hurd (5275), Lyman Dana Hurd (1946), Kenneth Badger Hurd (6075) ................................... 149 William Joy Hurd (4067), Albert Hunt Hurd {4066), Orrin Joy Hurd (4060), Edwin Brent Hurd (4069) ....................... 157 Isaac Bradley Hurd (1247), Emeline Dow Hurd, Carlton Hurd (2216). -
Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 I I
INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again - beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation. -
Stockton House, Wiltshire : Heritage Statement – Documentary Sources
STOCKTON HOUSE, WILTSHIRE : HERITAGE STATEMENT – DOCUMENTARY SOURCES Version 0.5 – November 26, 2014 Fig 1 : J.C. Buckler, South-West View of Stockton House, Wiltshire. dated 1810 (courtesy of Yale Center for British Art, B1991.40.75) Andrew Foyle : Stockton House Heritage Statement, Version 0.5; November 26 2014 Page 1 CONTENTS: Preamble Pages 1-2 1. Change Control Log Page 3 2. Timeline for Stockton House Page 4 2. History and Development of the Building Page 17 3. Ownership and Owners’ Biographies Page 48 4. Appendices: Document Texts Page 57 A: Rev. Thomas Miles, History of the Parish of Stockton, B : Letter from W.H. Hartley, of Sutton, to John Hughes of Stockton, Friday Feb 26th, 1773 C : Auctions of Furniture from Stockton House, 1906 and 1920 D: A visitor’s comments on Stockton House in 1898. E : Kelly’s Directory of Wiltshire, 1898 F: Inquest Report on the Death of a Gardener, 1888 G: Transcripts of Four Articles on Stockton House in Country Life (1905 and 1984) H: Excerpt from The Gardeners’ Chronicle, February 23, 1895, p. 230. Abbrevations: WHC – Wiltshire History Centre, Chippenham (formerly Wiltshire Record Office) WILBR – Wiltshire Buildings Record at Wiltshire History Centre Introduction This paper sets out the documentary sources for the architectural development, phasing and dating of Stockton House. It was prepared by Andrew Foyle to inform the conservation and repair work to be carried out by Donald Insall Associates. Andrew Foyle : Stockton House Heritage Statement, Version 0.5; November 26 2014 Page 2 CHANGE CONTROL LOG Version 0.0 issued April 22 2014 Version 0.1 issued April 28 2014 Minor typographical changes. -
The Building on History Project 5-6
www.open.ac.uk/buildingonhistory engaging with the past to shape the future the experience of building on history: the church in london BOH_pages_v2.indd 1 01/12/2011 10:38 BOH_pages_v2.indd 2 01/12/2011 10:38 Foreword Foreword “He led them through the depths, as through the wilderness.” [Psalm CVI] The Bible unfolds a historical drama whose author is ultimately God and the community of faith continually rehearses its story as a way of discerning the deep structure of the theo-drama and gathering energy for fresh adventures. The story of Jesus Christ himself is repeatedly related in the New Testament to previous actors in drama, notably Moses. Now is the time when the contemporary community of faith needs to refresh its understanding of the way the church has travelled or we shall lurch between unreasonable optimism and unwarranted despair. The past does not teach directly applicable lessons but it rhymes and serves to reveal perennial themes and temptations. A sense of the history in which we are involved can help us to see more clearly the contemporary roles we are being called to play. It is often said that “mission and ministry should be under girded with theology” but the understanding of what constitutes “theology” is frequently thin and a-historical. Theology is also distilled from the narrative of God’s dealings with the people he has called throughout the history of the church and the cultures in which she has been set. In my experience the church has lacked candour and sophistication in reflecting on and evaluating its own fashions and strategies. -
Popular Prophecy in Sixteenth-Century England
!o-b- t-l POPULAR PROPHECY IN SIXTEENTH. CENTURY ENGLAND : BY MOUTH AND PEN IN THE ATEHOUSE AND FROM THE PULPIT Frances M. Gladwin Department of History Thesis presented as requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophyin the Faculry of Arrs, University of Ade*aide Ma¡ch 1992. 1l CONTENTS Abstract Abb¡eviatiorrs --.....- ...--.ix 1 INTRODUCTION L PART ONE: The Definition of Prophecy Chapter One Modern Commentators z3 Chapter Two Tudor Prophets andMethods of Prophesying..---. ....-,--...45 Chapter Three The Prophecies 68 PART TWO: The Atøck on Prophecy Chapter Four Literary Opponenrs of Prophecy 89 Chapter Five Legislarive Opposition to Prophecy and Merhods of Prosecurion 120 PART THREE: The Transmission of Prophecy and the Participants Chapter Six The Transmission of Prophecy 152 Chapter Seven Parricipants: The Nobiliry t74 Chapter Eight Participanrs: The Clergy z0z Chapter Nine Participants: The Common People 228 111 CONCLUSION 257 Appendix One S tatutory I-e gi sl ation Under \(¡hich Judici al Authorities'Were Able to Prosecute Prophesiers 276 Appendix Two Sixteenth.Century Statutes Against Prophecy 278 Appendix Three Genealogical Chart of the Stafford Family 284 Appendix Four Genealogical Chart of the Pole Famíly 285 Appendix Five Genealogical Chart of the Howard Family 286 BIBLIOGRAPI{Y 287 GLOSSARY 338 ERRATA p.47 Lines 13 and 14 for "Pankhurst" read "Parkhurst". t'Foxe". p.48 Line 17 for "Fox" read p,74 Line 5 for "Stn/rre" read "Styrre". p,93 Líne 2 for " 1588 " read " 1583 ". p,123 Line 11 for "1558" read "1559". p, 156 Line 8 for "cardinal of York" read "archbishop of York" p. -
The 1641 Lords' Subcommittee on Religious Innovation
A “Theological Junto”: the 1641 Lords’ subcommittee on religious innovation Introduction During the spring of 1641, a series of meetings took place at Westminster, between a handful of prominent Puritan ministers and several of their Conformist counterparts. Officially, these men were merely acting as theological advisers to a House of Lords committee: but both the significance, and the missed potential, of their meetings was recognised by contemporary commentators and has been underlined in recent scholarship. Writing in 1655, Thomas Fuller suggested that “the moderation and mutual compliance of these divines might have produced much good if not interrupted.” Their suggestions for reform “might, under God, have been a means, not only to have checked, but choked our civil war in the infancy thereof.”1 A Conformist member of the sub-committee agreed with him. In his biography of John Williams, completed in 1658, but only published in 1693, John Hacket claimed that, during these meetings, “peace came... near to the birth.”2 Peter Heylyn was more critical of the sub-committee, in his biography of William Laud, published in 1671; but even he was quite clear about it importance. He wrote: Some hoped for a great Reformation to be prepared by them, and settled by the grand committee both in doctrine and discipline, and others as much feared (the affections of the men considered) that doctrinal Calvinism being once settled, more alterations would be made in the public liturgy... till it was brought more near the form of Gallic churches, after the platform of Geneva.3 A number of Non-conformists also looked back on the sub-committee as a missed opportunity.