DOCSLIB.ORG

CROSS MODAL INVESTMENTS FINAL REPORT Prepared for The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CROSS MODAL INVESTMENTS FINAL REPORT Prepared for The CROSS MODAL INVESTMENTS FINAL REPORT Prepared for The National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Board of The National Academies TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRIVILEGED DOCUMENT This document, not released for publication, is furnished only for review to members of or participants in the work of CRP. This document is to be regarded as fully privileged, and dissemination of the information included herein must be approved by CRP. Principal Investigator, Ella Claney Sean Libberton Katharina McLaughlin Stephanie McVey WSP (Formerly WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff) Washington, D.C. September 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SPONSORSHIP This work was sponsored by one or more of the following as noted: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, and was conducted in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Federal Transit Administration and was conducted in the Transit Cooperative Research Program, Federal Aviation Administration and was conducted in the Airport Cooperative Research Program, Research and Innovative Technology Administration and was conducted in the National Cooperative Freight Research Program, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration and was conducted in the Hazardous Materials Cooperative Research Program, Federal Railroad Administration and was conducted in the National Cooperative Rail Research Program, which is administered by the Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. DISCLAIMER This is an uncorrected draft as submitted by the Contractor. The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied herein are those of the Contractor. They are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board, the National Academies, or the program sponsors. CROSS MODAL INVESTMENTS FINAL REPORT Prepared for The National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Board of The National Academies Principal Investigator, Ella Claney Sean Libberton Katharina McLaughlin Stephanie McVey WSP (Formerly WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff) Washington, D.C. September 2017 Contents LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................... III LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................... IV ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................... V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 1 Objectives of Resource Guide .................................................................................................................. 1 Definition of Cross Modal Investment ...................................................................................................... 1 Description of The Searchable Cross Modal Funding Database .............................................................. 1 Description of The Annotated Literature Review ..................................................................................... 2 Description of Case Studies ...................................................................................................................... 2 Cross modal Issues .................................................................................................................................... 3 Best Practices ............................................................................................................................................ 3 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 4 Purpose of the Resource Guide ..................................................................................................... 4 Benefits to the Transit Agencies ................................................................................................... 5 Benefit to Funding Agencies......................................................................................................... 5 Searchable Cross modal Investment Funding Database ............................................................... 5 Research Methodology ................................................................................................................. 6 Organization of the Resource Guide ............................................................................................. 8 DEFINING CROSS MODAL INVESTMENTS .............................................................................. 9 Cross Modal Investments Defined ................................................................................................ 9 Common Cross Modal Issues ..................................................................................................... 10 IDENTIFYING CROSS MODAL INVESTMENT OPTIONS .................................................... 12 Federal Cross Modal Investment Options ................................................................................... 12 Non-Federal Cross Modal Investment Opportunities ................................................................. 15 Alternative Non-Transportation Federal Funding Programs ...................................................... 18 i Cap and Trade ............................................................................................................................. 20 Searchable Cross Modal Funding Database – User Guide ......................................................... 21 CASE STUDIES ............................................................................................................................... 27 Case Study Selection ................................................................................................................... 27 Dulles Corridor Metrorail Phase 2 .............................................................................................. 30 San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Parking Revenues ......................................... 37 Delmar Trolley Loop .................................................................................................................. 42 Gilbert Road Light Rail Extension .............................................................................................. 47 US 36 Managed Lane/Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Phase 1 ........................................................... 51 PennDOT, SEPTA, and Port Authority: Cross-Modal Funding by Act 44 & Act 89................. 57 Tampa Hillsborough Expressway Authority (THEA) Bus Toll Lanes Proposal ........................ 61 IMPLEMENTING A CROSS MODAL INVESTMENT .............................................................. 65 Step 1 - Identify Cross Modal Opportunities .............................................................................. 65 Step 2 – Understand Common Issues ......................................................................................... 66 Step 3 - Implement Best Practices .............................................................................................. 68 Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 71 ANNOTATED LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................. 72 LIST OF TABLES Table 3-1 STP Funding for Transit 2009 – 2013 ........................................................................................ 13 Table 3-2 CMAQ Funding for Transit 2009 – 2013 ................................................................................... 13 Table 3-3 Toll Revenue Example ............................................................................................................... 14 Table 4-1 Case Study Selection Cross Modal Investment Sizing ............................................................... 28 Table 4-2 Cross Modal Case Study Categorization .................................................................................... 29 Table 4-3 MWAA Dulles Corridor Project Phase 2 Funding Amounts ..................................................... 33 Table 4-4 MWAA PFC Amounts Collected or Anticipated Annually, FY13 -FY17 ($ million) ............... 33 Table 4-5 Muni Annual Parking Tax Revenues for Transit Project ........................................................... 38 Table 4-6 SFMTA Net Bond Proceeds as of FY 2016 ............................................................................... 39 Table 4-7 Delmar Loop Trolley Project Funding Amounts ........................................................................ 45 Table 4-8 Central Mesa Project Funding Amounts..................................................................................... 49 Table 4-9 US-36 Managed Lane/BRT Project Funding Amounts .............................................................. 54 Table 4-10 Annual CBE Funding Revenue ($ million) .............................................................................. 54 Table 4-11 Act 44 Funding Requirements Proposed for PTC .................................................................... 58 Table 4-12 Act 89 Funding Requirements .................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Can Public Transit Revitalize Detroit? the Qline and the People Mover”
    “Can Public Transit Revitalize Detroit? The QLine and the People Mover” John B. Sutcliffe, Sarah Cipkar and Geoffrey Alchin Department of Political Science, University of Windsor Windsor, Ontario, N9B 3P4 Email: [email protected] Paper prepared for presentation at the Canadian Political Science Association Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC. June 2019. This is a working draft. Please do not cite without permission. 1 “Can Public Transit Revitalize Detroit? The QLine and the People Mover" Introduction On May 12, 2017 a new streetcar – the QLine – began operating in Detroit, running along a 3.3- mile (6.6-mile return) route on Woodward Avenue, one of the central north-south roads in the city. This project is one example of the return to prominence of streetcars in the (re)development of American cities. Having fallen into disuse and abandonment in hundreds of American cities during the early part of the 20th century, this form of public transit has returned in many cities including, for example, Dallas, Cincinnati, Kansas City, and Portland. As streetcar services have returned to prominence, so too has the debate about their utility as a form of public transit, the function they serve in a city, and who they serve (Brown 2013; Culver 2017). These debates are evident in the case of Detroit. Proponents of the QLine – most prominently the individuals and organizations that advocated for its creation and provided the majority of the start-up capital – have praised the streetcar for acting as a spur to development, for being a forward-thinking transit system and for acting as a first step towards a comprehensive regional transit system in Metro Detroit (see M-1 Rail 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Metrorail/Coconut Grove Connection Study Phase II Technical
    METRORAILICOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 & TECHNICAL DATA DEVELOPMENT Technical Memorandum Number 3 Prepared for Prepared by IIStB Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 METRORAIUCOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 Prepared for Prepared by BS'R Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 2.0 STUDY DESCRiPTION ........................................................................................ 1 3.0 TRANSIT MODES DESCRIPTION ...................................................................... 4 3.1 ENHANCED BUS SERViCES ................................................................... 4 3.2 BUS RAPID TRANSIT .............................................................................. 5 3.3 TROLLEY BUS SERVICES ...................................................................... 6 3.4 SUSPENDED/CABLEWAY TRANSIT ...................................................... 7 3.5 AUTOMATED GUIDEWAY TRANSiT ....................................................... 7 3.6 LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT .............................................................................. 8 3.7 HEAVY RAIL ............................................................................................. 8 3.8 MONORAIL
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin R-42S MAKE THEIR FINAL, FINAL RUN Published by the Electric Railroaders’ Association, Inc
    ERA BULLETIN — MARCH, 2020 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 63, No. 3 March, 2020 The Bulletin R-42S MAKE THEIR FINAL, FINAL RUN Published by the Electric Railroaders’ Association, Inc. P. O. Box 3323 Grand Central Station New York, NY 10163 For general inquiries, or Bulletin submissions, contact us at bulletin@erausa. org or on our website at erausa. org/contact Editorial Staff: Jeffrey Erlitz Editor-in-Chief Ronald Yee Tri-State News and Commuter Rail Editor Alexander Ivanoff North American and World News Editor David Ross Production Manager Copyright © 2019 ERA This Month’s Cover Photo: Second Avenue Elevated, looking north from 34th The R-42s are seen at Hammels Wye on the last trip northbound from Far Rockaway-Mott Av to Inwood-207 St. Street in about 1937, pho- Marc A. Hermann photograph tographer unknown. MTA New York City Transit retired the last thusiasts joined MTA Chairman and CEO remaining R-42 subway cars from service Patrick J. Foye and NYC Transit President today, ending a 51-year run. The cars have Andy Byford riding the last R-42 in passen- been used on two dozen lines, each traveling ger service. more than seven million miles. They had a “These cars have served the MTA well as a memorable role in an iconic car-vs.-train reliable fleet over the last 50 years,” said Sal- In This Issue: chase in the classic 1971 film French Con- ly Librera, Senior Vice President, Department LIRR Main Line nection. of Subways for New York City Transit. “As Third-Track The final run followed a send-off ceremony technology advances, we’re looking to mod- at the New York Transit Museum, and was ernize our fleet of subway cars to best serve Project Update scheduled to proceed through a final trip on New Yorkers.” …Page 3 the A line from Euclid Av to Far Rockaway (Continued on page 2) to 207 St, before returning to Euclid Av to close its doors for the last time.
    [Show full text]
  • CHRISTOPHER PATTON, Plaintiff, V. SEPTA, Faye LM Moore, and Cecil
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : CHRISTOPHER PATTON, : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION : v. : NO. 06-707 : SEPTA, Faye L. M. Moore, : and Cecil W. Bond Jr., : Defendants. : Memorandum and Order YOHN, J. January ___, 2007 Plaintiff Christopher Patton brings the instant action pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq . (“ADA”); the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. § 1983; the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, 43 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 955(a) (“PHRA”); and Article I of the Pennsylvania Constitution, against defendants Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”); SEPTA’s General Manager, Faye L. M. Moore; and SEPTA’s Assistant General Manager, Cecil W. Bond Jr. (collectively, “defendants”). Presently before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, as to plaintiff’s claims under the PHRA against defendants Moore and Bond (Counts VII and VIII), plaintiff’s claims for violation of the Pennsylvania Constitution (Counts XI, XII, and XIII) and plaintiff’s demand for punitive damages. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion will be granted in part and denied in part. 1 I. Factual and Procedural Background A. Plaintiff’s Factual Allegations Plaintiff was hired by SEPTA on December 8, 1997 to develop and direct its Capital and Long Range Planning Department. (Second Am. Compl. (“Compl.”) ¶ 14.) Defendant Moore, is the General Manager of SEPTA (id . at ¶¶ 6, 13); defendant Bond is the Assistant General Manager of SEPTA (id.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSIT SYSTEM MAP Local Routes E
    Non-Metro Service 99 Woodlands Express operates three Park & 99 METRO System Sistema de METRO Ride lots with service to the Texas Medical W Center, Greenway Plaza and Downtown. To Kingwood P&R: (see Park & Ride information on reverse) H 255, 259 CALI DR A To Townsen P&R: HOLLOW TREE LN R Houston D 256, 257, 259 Northwest Y (see map on reverse) 86 SPRING R E Routes are color-coded based on service frequency during the midday and weekend periods: Medical F M D 91 60 Las rutas están coloradas por la frecuencia de servicio durante el mediodía y los fines de semana. Center 86 99 P&R E I H 45 M A P §¨¦ R E R D 15 minutes or better 20 or 30 minutes 60 minutes Weekday peak periods only T IA Y C L J FM 1960 V R 15 minutes o mejor 20 o 30 minutos 60 minutos Solo horas pico de días laborales E A D S L 99 T L E E R Y B ELLA BLVD D SPUR 184 FM 1960 LV R D 1ST ST S Lone Star Routes with two colors have variations in frequency (e.g. 15 / 30 minutes) on different segments as shown on the System Map. T A U College L E D Peak service is approximately 2.5 hours in the morning and 3 hours in the afternoon. Exact times will vary by route. B I N N 249 E 86 99 D E R R K ") LOUETTA RD EY RD E RICHEY W A RICH E RI E N K W S R L U S Rutas con dos colores (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Loop Map Web.Indd
    COCA (Center of Creative Arts) University City - City Hall The 560 Music Center of Washington University Apartments Post Office University City Public Library Salon K U-City Grill Future Retail Cicero's Restaurant & Entertainment Plex T-Mobile The Melting Pot Future Retail Jimmy John's Future Retail Público Which Wich St. Louis Bubble Tea L The Vault OOP NOR Randolfi’s Italian Kitchen Seoul Taco Club Fitness (2nd floor) Craft Alliance Center of Art + Design Future Retail Answers.com (3rd floor) TH Midtown Farmers Market PrettiKat Boutique McArthur’s Bakery Cafe Enigma Tattoos Pitaya Sole and Blues Commerce Bank Corner 17 Vintage Vinyl Joy Luck Chinese Express Sunshine Daydream Starbucks Snow Factory St. Louis Vapor Exchange Wong’s Wok Future Retail Taj Mahal Fitz’s Future Retail Shawarma King Chuck Berry Statue CENTENNIAL GREENWAY BICYCLE PATH Side Street Hair Designers Salt + Smoke BBQ Copper Hinge - Small Batch Eyeware Blueberry Hill Restaurant and Music Club Compônere Gallery of Art and Gallery Framing Artisans at Compônere GoMusicSTL Carl Safe Design Consultants Ranoush Middle Eastern Restaurant Doughocracy Avalon Exchange Wizard’s Wagon Al-Tarboush Deli Ben & Jerry's Blue Ocean Sushi Restaurant Future Retail El Maguey Mexican Restaurant Benjamin Evans Law Firm (2nd floor) Phoenix Rising Rocket Fizz Soda Pop & Candy Shop FroYo Create Space DK & Co. Three Dog Bakery Baked T’s OSO: A Style Lab Hats-N-Stuff The Silver Lady Parking Garage H.S.B. Tobacconist Future Retail This! Tivoli Theatre Iron Age Tattoo Fleur de Lou Three Kings Public
    [Show full text]
  • Rider Guide / Guía De Pasajeros
    Updated 02/10/2019 Rider Guide / Guía de Pasajeros Stations / Estaciones Stations / Estaciones Northline Transit Center/HCC Theater District Melbourne/North Lindale Central Station Capitol Lindale Park Central Station Rusk Cavalcade Convention District Moody Park EaDo/Stadium Fulton/North Central Coffee Plant/Second Ward Quitman/Near Northside Lockwood/Eastwood Burnett Transit Center/Casa De Amigos Altic/Howard Hughes UH Downtown Cesar Chavez/67th St Preston Magnolia Park Transit Center Central Station Main l Transfer to Green or Purple Rail Lines (see map) Destination Signs / Letreros Direccionales Westbound – Central Station Capitol Eastbound – Central Station Rusk Eastbound Theater District to Magnolia Park Hacia el este Magnolia Park Main Street Square Bell Westbound Magnolia Park to Theater District Downtown Transit Center Hacia el oeste Theater District McGowen Ensemble/HCC Wheeler Transit Center Museum District Hermann Park/Rice U Stations / Estaciones Memorial Hermann Hospital/Houston Zoo Theater District Dryden/TMC Central Station Capitol TMC Transit Center Central Station Rusk Smith Lands Convention District Stadium Park/Astrodome EaDo/Stadium Fannin South Leeland/Third Ward Elgin/Third Ward Destination Signs / Letreros Direccionales TSU/UH Athletics District Northbound Fannin South to Northline/HCC UH South/University Oaks Hacia el norte Northline/HCC MacGregor Park/Martin Luther King, Jr. Southbound Northline/HCC to Fannin South Palm Center Transit Center Hacia el sur Fannin South Destination Signs / Letreros Direccionales Eastbound Theater District to Palm Center TC Hacia el este Palm Center Transit Center Westbound Palm Center TC to Theater District Hacia el oeste Theater District The Fare/Pasaje / Local Make Your Ride on METRORail Viaje en METRORail Rápido y Fare Type Full Fare* Discounted** Transfer*** Fast and Easy Fácil Tipo de Pasaje Pasaje Completo* Descontado** Transbordo*** 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Cincinnati's Hard-Won Modern Tram Revival
    THE INTERNATIONAL LIGHT RAIL MAGAZINE www.lrta.org www.tautonline.com NOVEMBER 2016 NO. 947 CINCINNATI’S HARD-WON MODERN TRAM REVIVAL InnoTrans: The world’s greatest railway showcase Russian cities’ major low-floor orders Stadler and Solaris join for tram bids Doha Metro tunnelling is complete ISSN 1460-8324 £4.25 Berlin Canada’s ‘Radial’ 11 Above and below the Exploring Ontario’s streets of the capital Halton County line 9 771460 832043 LRT MONITOR TheLRT MONITOR series from Mainspring is an essential reference work for anyone who operates in the world’s light and urban rail sectors. Featuring regular updates in both digital and print form, the LRT Monitor includes an overview of every established line and network as well as details of planned schemes and those under construction. POLAND POZNAŃ Tramways play an important role in one of of the main railway station. Poland’s biggest and most historic cities, with In 2012 a line opened to the east of the city, the first horse-drawn tramline opening in 1880. with an underground section containing two An overview Electrification followed in 1898. sub-surface stations and a new depot. The The network was badly damaged during World reconstruction of Kaponiera roundabout, an A high-quality War Two, resuming operations in 1947 and then important tram junction, is set for completion in of the system’s only east of the river Warta. Service returned to 2016. When finished, it will be a three-level image for ease the western side of the city in 1952 with the junction, with a PST interchange on the lower development, opening of the Marchlewski bridge (now named level.
    [Show full text]
  • Stone Consulting, Inc. Historic Trolley Projects
    Stone Consulting, Inc. Historic Trolley Projects 324 Pennsylvania Avenue West, P. O. Box 306, Warren PA 16365 Phone: 814.726.9870 Fax: 814.726.9855 The Kenosha Transit Electric Streetcar Circulator Harborpark is a new community on the shores of Lake Michigan that would not exist without the streetcar. This redeveloped 69-acre site of a former Nash Engine Plant has approximately 450 new residential units consisting of condominiums, townhouses, garden apartments, and Pike Creek Plaza offers shops, outdoor cafes, and a seasonal farmers’ market Celebration Place is a 12-acre major gathering place Fountain Plaza is a major water feature which serves as Harborpark’s focal point Harborwalk Promenade – an 8’-wide walkway along the water’s edge A mile-long multi-purpose trail with a 7-acre recreational area Added more than $50,000,000 in assessments to the tax rolls A natural history museum was completed in 2001 Stone Consulting, Inc. (Stone) was chosen by the City of Kenosha to provide the prelimi- nary and final design for the track, overhead wire, and the rectifier package for this two-mile historic trolley system connecting the harborfront development with the commuter rail station. The two-mile trolley is an urban connector providing transportation for both tourists and residents. It connects Harborpark to the existing central city area, the METRA commuter rail station, and the city bus transfer station. The presence of the streetcars enhances the character of the area while providing needed mobility and reliability. Kenosha is the first city in Wisconsin to reintroduce an electric trolley system for public transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Guidelines and Standards
    Service Guidelines and Standards Revised Summer 2015 Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority | Austin, Texas TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Purpose 3 Overview 3 Update 3 Service Types 4 SERVICE GUIDELINES Density and Service Coverage 5 Land Use 6 Destinations and Activity Centers 6 Streets and Sidewalk Characteristics 7 Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics 7 Route Directness 8 Route Deviation 9 Two-way Service 10 Branching and Short-Turns 10 Route Spacing 11 Route Length 11 Route Terminals 11 Service Span 12 Service Frequency 12 Bus Stop Spacing 13 Bus Stop Placement 13 Bus Stop Amenities 14 MetroRapid Stations vs. Bus Stops 15 Transit Centers and Park & Rides 15 SERVICE STANDARDS Schedule Reliability 19 Load Factors 19 Ridership Productivity and Cost-Effectiveness 20 Potential Corrective Actions 21 New and Altered Services 21 Service Change Process 22 APPENDIX A1: Map – Households without Access to an Automobile 24 A2: Map – Elderly Population Exceeding 10% of Total Population 25 A3: Map - Youth Population Exceeding 25% by Census Block 26 A4: Map – Household Income Below 50% of Regional Median 27 B1: Chart – Park & Ride Level of Service (LOS) Amenities 28 Service Guidelines and Standards INTRODUCTION Purpose The Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority connects people, jobs and communities by providing quality transportation choices. Service guidelines and standards reflect the goals and objectives of the Authority. Capital Metro Strategic Goals: 1) Provide a Great Customer Experience 2) Improve Business Practices 3) Demonstrate the Value of Public Transportation in an Active Community 4) Be a Regional Leader Overview Service guidelines provide a framework for the provision, design, and allocation of service. Service guidelines incorporate transit service planning factors including residential and employment density, land use, activity centers, street characteristics, and demographics.
    [Show full text]
  • Light Rail Transit (LRT) ♦Rapid ♦Streetcar
    Methodological Considerations in Assessing the Urban Economic and Land-Use Impacts of Light Rail Development Lyndon Henry Transportation Planning Consultant Mobility Planning Associates Austin, Texas Olivia Schneider Researcher Light Rail Now Rochester, New York David Dobbs Publisher Light Rail Now Austin, Texas Evidence-Based Consensus: Major Transit Investment Does Influence Economic Development … … But by how much? How to evaluate it? (No easy answer) Screenshot of Phoenix Business Journal headline: L. Henry Study Focus: Three Typical Major Urban Transit Modes ■ Light Rail Transit (LRT) ♦Rapid ♦Streetcar ■ Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Why Include BRT? • Particularly helps illustrate methodological issues • Widespread publicity of assertions promoting BRT has generated national and international interest in transit-related economic development issues Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) Widely publicized assertion: “Per dollar of transit investment, and under similar conditions, Bus Rapid Transit leverages more transit-oriented development investment than Light Rail Transit or streetcars.” Key Issues in Evaluating Transit Project’s Economic Impact • Was transit project a catalyst to economic development or just an adjunctive amenity? • Other salient factors involved in stimulating economic development? • Evaluated by analyzing preponderance of civic consensus and other contextual factors Data Sources: Economic Impacts • Formal studies • Tallies/assessments by civic groups, business associations, news media, etc. • Reliability
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Oriented Development Plan for the DELMAR LOOP and FOREST PARK–Debaliviere METROLINK STATIONS
    Transit Oriented Development Plan For the DELMAR LOOP and FOREST PARK–DeBALIVIERE METROLINK STATIONS prepared by H3 Studio for the City of Saint Louis Final Report September 2013 Acknowledgements CLIENT GROUP PLANNING TEAM The City of Saint Louis H3 Studio Lead Consultant Honorable Francis G. Slay Mayor Don Roe Director of Planning, Planning & Urban Design John Hoal, Ph.D., AICP Principal-In-Charge Agency Timothy Breihan, A.AIA Major Project Manager Connie Tomasula Urban Designer, Planning & Urban Design Laura L. Lyon, VP, CNU Project Manager Agency Bryan Taylor Robinson, AICP Sustainability Planner Project Manager St. Louis Development Corporation Courtney Cushard, LEED AP Urban Designer Angie Hristova Urban Researcher Otis Williams Executive Director Jonathan Stitelman Urban Designer Amy Lampe Major Project Manager Christopher Liao Technical Staff Reed Miller Technical Staff Andrew Luy Technical Staff TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Bernardin, Lochmueller & Associates Cheryl Adelstein Director of Community Relations & Local Transportation Sub-Consultant Government Affairs, Washington University in St. Louis Douglas Shatto, PE, PTOE Transportation Services Todd Antoine Director for Planning, Manager Great Rivers Greenway District Christopher Beard, PE, PTOE Project Engineer Gary Boehnke Director, Skinker DeBaliviere Community Christopher Joannes Traffic Planner Housing Corporation Ryan Bumb Traffic Engineering Mary Campbell Assistant Vice Chancellor for Real Estate, Specialist Washington University in St. Louis Robert Innis Principal, Kim
    [Show full text]