DOCSLIB.ORG

Transit Operations Quarterly Report Q2-FY18[Icon]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ATTACHMENT 7A Transit Operations Quarterly Report For the Period October 1, 2017 – December 31, 2017 (Q2 of FY18) Page 1 of 47 Contents BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 4 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ............................................................................. 8 ROUTE PERFORMANCE ............................................................................................. 30 NCTD CUSTOMER FEEDBACK .................................................................................. 37 FARE COLLECTION SYSTEM .................................................................................... 46 Page 2 of 47 BACKGROUND NCTD produces this Quarterly Performance Report to provide information regarding the performance of its operations. The data contained in this report for Fiscal Year 2018 is unaudited and subject to change. Final and audited financial and performance results will be provided as part of NCTD’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Page 3 of 47 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ridership Performance NCTD’s ridership performance is consistent with the nation-wide trends of decreased transit ridership, which can partly be attributed to the growing popularity of transportation network companies (TNCs), like Uber and Lyft, low unemployment, and increased automobile sales. Internal factors, like on-time performance, reliability, and missed trips, also impact ridership. BREEZE average miles per hour (MPH) have decreased by over 1 MPH since FY14; as travel times increase, customers with other mobility options will be more likely to choose those faster options. NCTD took proactive steps to address declining ridership and customer revenue trends. Actions include: 1. Implementation of Board approved route changes, which went into effect on October 8, 2017. These changes improved productivity and have resulted in increased ridership. This 2nd Quarter Transit Operations Report will provide information about the impact of this service change. 2. Board approval to forward proposed fare change recommendations to SANDAG that would be implemented in July 2018. 3. Engaging with COASTER customers via survey to garner feedback about NCTD’s services. 4. Initiated project planning and submitted a grant application for a comprehensive operations analysis (COA) – an in-depth study of NCTD’s modes that will guide future service levels, design, and implementation. NCTD also received a grant to support a land use study that will be a precursor to the COA. The land use study will inventory and analyze existing land use, planning conditions, gaps between land use and mobility, and strategies to address these gaps. Ridership across all modes (BREEZE, COASTER, SPRINTER, LIFT, and FLEX) is 2.06% less than budgeted for FY18 Quarter 2 and 7.41% less than budgeted YTD. Ridership for NCTD’s fixed-route bus (BREEZE) and rail services (COASTER and SPRINTER) decreased by 2.56% in Quarter 2 when compared with FY17 Quarter 2. BREEZE service levels have changed since the prior year with the implementation of the service change on October 8th, 2017. The table below details the average weekday, Saturday, and Sunday BREEZE operating statistics in FY18 Quarter 2 compared with FY17 Quarter 2. Page 4 of 47 Table 1 FY17 Quarter 2 vs FY18 Quarter 2 Operating Statistics FY17 Quarter 2 FY18 Quarter 2 Difference Weekday Revenue Miles 17,302.81 15,887.78 -8.18% Saturday Revenue Miles 11,615.68 10,562.78 -9.06% Sunday Revenue Miles 8,911.81 8,763.32 -1.67% Weekday Total Miles 19,547.79 18,231.67 -6.73% Saturday Total Miles 12,688.28 11,613.73 -8.47% Sunday Total Miles 9,589.63 9,572.57 -0.18% Weekday Revenue Hours 1,523.36 1,398.35 -8.21% Saturday Revenue Hours 887.43 850.25 -4.19% Sunday Revenue Hours 668.06 703.49 5.30% Weekday Total Hours 1,645.77 1,507.41 -8.41% Saturday Total Hours 936.68 897.11 -4.22% Sunday Total Hours 699.18 740.40 5.90% BREEZE and SPRINTER services are scheduled to support seamless transfers between the modes. Due to a strong interdependence of the two modes, ridership is expected to consistently trend in the same direction, if one increases, the other should increase and vice versa. However, as was the case in Quarter 1, SPRINTER ridership increased by 1.71% in Quarter 2 while BREEZE declined by 4.22%. The gap between the two modes is slowly decreasing, with BREEZE making improved ridership gains compared to Quarter 1, average weekday ridership in December FY18 was only 1.03% less than the prior year. The COASTER experienced a ridership decline of 2.44% during Quarter 2 for FY18. Encinitas Station had the greatest decrease in ridership (8.41%) during FY18 Quarter 2. FLEX ridership increased in FY18 Quarter 2 by 63.07% compared to FY17 Quarter 2. This can be attributed to the introduction of FLEX 392 and 395, two former BREEZE routes serving areas in Camp Pendleton. FLEX routes 373 and 374 were eliminated with the October 8, 2017 service change. LIFT ridership decreased by 12.35% for Quarter 2 of FY18. The average call response time decreased positively by over a minute and approaches the goal of within two minutes, additionally, the average length of calls decreased by 14.99%, while on-time performance improved by 1.11%. Farebox Recovery Farebox recovery decreased for every NCTD transit mode (2.47%) except FLEX which increased by 3.56%. Although SPRINTER ridership increased by 1.71% compared to FY17 Quarter 2, SPRINTER farebox recovery decreased by 2.92% during FY18 Quarter 2. As a result of the lower than budgeted ridership (discussed above), NCTD fare revenue is down 9.12% from the budget for Quarter 2 and 8.94% YTD. COASTER had the largest difference between budgeted fare and actual fare (-23.13%) followed by LIFT, Page 5 of 47 SPRINTER, BREEZE, and FLEX. COASTER had a promotional fare of 50% off during November which contributed to the lower than expected fare revenue. The decrease in farebox recovery can also be attributed to the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP). The customer revenue from the discounted passes is lower than regular fares and results in a reduced farebox recovery. FLEX service experienced an increase in its farebox recovery for FY18 Quarter 2 compared with FY17 Quarter 2 from 11.83%, to 15.39%. The increase is largely due to the conversion of BREEZE Routes 392 and 395 to FLEX which come with a premium fare but also allow for deviations to certain areas providing service to any destination within ¾ mile from the route. Although farebox recovery increased, the net cost per passenger increased by $8.02 to $44.11. A major factor in the increased cost per passenger was due to staff’s inability to predict how customers would use the new FLEX routes, as a result, trip runtimes were inflated to ensure connections would be made between the 392 and the 315 – the more runtime on a trip usually equates to increased revenue hours or hours that are contractually billable. Based off on-time performance and runtime data, staff have reduced runtimes and as a result, revenue hours. Table 2 below shows the change in revenue hours, total miles, and the estimated difference in cost after April 1st, 2018 on FLEX Routes 392 and 395. If ridership and fare revenue stay the same, farebox recovery is expected to increase to 18.2% and cost per passenger is expected to decrease to $32.51. The cost per passenger is high compared to fixed-route modes, but FLEX 392 and 395 replaced paratransit service on much of Camp Pendleton and replaced two unproductive BREEZE routes while maintaining transit service to the unproductive areas. Table 2 Existing Weekday Statistics and Cost compared to Weekday Statistics and Cost after April Service Change for FLEX 392 and 395 Current After April Difference Current After April Cost Cost in cost Revenue Hours 54.87 $1,660.60 42.62 $1,289.87 -$370.74 Total Miles 819.92 $815.82 805.92 $801.89 -$13.93 Total $2,476.42 $2,091.75 -$384.67 On-Time Performance NCTD has established on-time performance goals for each of its modes. The following is a summary of the modal performance compared with the goal for the first quarter of Fiscal Year 2018. • BREEZE fixed-route on-time performance goal is 90%. FY18 Quarter 2 performance was 88.74%. • SPRINTER rail on-time performance goal is 98%. FY18 Quarter 2 performance was 97.7%. • COASTER rail on-time performance goal is 95%. FY18 Quarter 2 performance was 92.57%. Page 6 of 47 • LIFT ADA Paratransit service on-time performance goal is 92%. FY18 Quarter 2 performance was 92.08%. • FLEX on-time performance goal is 95%. FY18 Quarter 2 performance was 98.30%. BREEZE on-time performance decreased by 0.84% in FY18 Quarter 2 compared to FY17 Quarter 2. NCTD changes BREEZE schedules twice a year (April and October); as operators become more familiar with route changes that took place in October, on-time performance is expected to increase. Scheduling staff also conducted running time analyses on many of the routes to improve on-time performance, with improvement expected in Quarter 4 with the April schedule. COASTER on-time performance increased by 3.23% from FY17 Quarter 2. The increase is a result of some construction projects nearing completion and also slight adjustments to running time to accommodate for positive train control initialization. There are more than six (6) projects totaling $427 million under construction that are impacting COASTER operations. The construction impacts have resulted in railroad closures, longer travel times, and delays. Unfortunately, NCTD cannot eliminate all the construction delays. However, NCTD, SANDAG, and the construction contractors are working on strategies to minimize the impact of construction on train service. LIFT on-time performance improved by 1.11% in FY18 Quarter 2 over FY17 Quarter 2. NCTD implemented a policy change to on-time performance, which increased the on-time window from within 20-minutes to 30-minutes of the scheduled pick-up time.
Recommended publications
  • Meeting Notice and Agenda

    Meeting Notice and Agenda

    MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA SPRINTER SMART GROWTH WORKING GROUP The SPRINTER Smart Growth Working Group may take action on any item appearing on this agenda. Wednesday, April 11, 2007 1:30 to 3:30 p.m. City of San Marcos, Valley of Discovery Room 1 Civic Center Drive San Marcos, CA 92069 Staff Contacts: Susan Baldwin and Christine Eary (619) 699-1943; (619) 699-6928 [email protected]; [email protected] AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS • DEBRIEF FROM SPRINTER STATION AREA TOUR • I-PLACE3S SKETCH MODELING TOOL • SPRINTER SERVICE PLAN AND BUS COORDINATION SANDAG offices are accessible by public transit. Phone 1-800-COMMUTE or see www.sdcommute.com for route information. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), SANDAG will accommodate persons who require assistance in order to participate in SANDAG meetings. If such assistance is required, please contact SANDAG at (619) 699-1900 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. To request this document or related reports in an alternative format, please call (619) 699-1900, (619) 699-1904 (TTY), or fax (619) 699-1905. SPRINTER SMART GROWTH WORKING GROUP Wednesday, April 11, 2007 ITEM # RECOMMENDATION 1. WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS +2. SPRINTER SMART GROWTH WORKING GROUP MEETING APPROVE SUMMARY The Working Group should review and approve the January 31, 2007, Meeting Summary. REPORTS (3 through 6) 3. DEBRIEF FROM SPRINTER STATION AREA TOUR (WG members) DISCUSS Working Group (WG) members will have the opportunity to share comments and questions regarding the station area sites visited during the SPRINTER tour on March 14. Working Group members are asked to comment on site constraints common among the station areas, and strategies being implemented to address those constraints.
  • Transit Operations Quarterly Report Q4-FY17[Icon]

    Transit Operations Quarterly Report Q4-FY17[Icon]

    ATTACHMENT 4A Transit Operations Quarterly Report For the Period April 1, 2017 – June 30, 2017 (Q4 of FY17) Page 1 of 59 Contents BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 4 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ............................................................................. 8 RIDERSHIP ................................................................................................................... 12 ROUTE PERFORMANCE ............................................................................................. 25 CUSTOMER FEEDBACK ............................................................................................. 41 FARE COLLECTION SYSTEM .................................................................................... 58 Page 2 of 59 BACKGROUND NCTD produces this Quarterly Performance Report to provide information regarding the performance of its operations. The data contained in this report for Fiscal Year 2017 is unaudited and subject to change. In December 2015, NCTD awarded a new contract to Bombardier Transportation (Holdings) USA, Inc. (Bombardier) for combined SPRINTER and COASTER operations and maintenance. Revenue operations by Bombardier commenced with an early start in mid-June 2016, three weeks before the beginning of FY2017, July 1, 2016. The Bombardier contract with NCTD included a more robust capital project
  • Agenda [PDF, 877

    Agenda [PDF, 877

    SPRINTER SMART GROWTH WORKING GROUP SPRINTER STATION AREA TOUR ITINERARY Wednesday, March 14, 2007 1:00 – 4:30 p.m. Tour begins and ends at: Oceanside Transit Center 195 South Tremont Street Oceanside, CA 92054 Staff Contact: Susan Baldwin and Christine Eary (619) 699-1943; (619) 699-6928 [email protected]; [email protected] AGENDA HIGHLIGHT • SPRINTER STATION AREA TOUR Phone 1-800-COMMUTE or see www.sdcommute.com for route information. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), SANDAG will accommodate persons who require assistance in order to participate in SANDAG meetings. If such assistance is required, please contact SANDAG at (619) 699-1900 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. To request this document or related reports in an alternative format, please call (619) 699-1900, (619) 699-1904 (TTY), or fax (619) 699-1905. SPRINTER SMART GROWTH WORKING GROUP Wednesday, March 14, 2007 Participants will meet at the Oceanside Transit Center COASTER platform at 1:00 p.m. An accessible bus will pick up participants at the Oceanside Transit Center to continue the tour. The tour will attempt to stop at all six station areas listed, subject to traffic conditions. The bus will return to the Oceanside Transit Center by approximately 4:30 p.m. Cookies, soft drinks, and water will be provided. Participants can access the Oceanside Transit Center via COASTER or bus; if traveling by car, there is a parking structure located at the Oceanside Transit Center. Please see Attachment 1. Please note: Members of the public or news media wishing to participate in the tour should contact Christine Eary at SANDAG at (619) 699-6928 or [email protected], no later than 5 p.m., Friday, March 9, 2007.
  • Title Vi Triennial Program Update for Metropolitan Transit District and North County Transit District

    Title Vi Triennial Program Update for Metropolitan Transit District and North County Transit District

    TITLE VI TRIENNIAL PROGRAM UPDATE FOR METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DISTRICT AND NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT AUGUST 2012 401 B Street, Suite 800 • San Diego, CA 92101-4231 • (619) 699-1900 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter I General Requirements and Guidelines..................................................................... 1 1. Overview .............................................................................................................. 2 2. Required Components of the Program Update ................................................ 2 3. General Requirements ........................................................................................ 2 Chapter II Program-Specific Requirements and Guidelines for Recipients Serving Large Urbanized Areas ........................................................ 13 1. Overview .............................................................................................................. 14 2. Program-Specific Requirements ......................................................................... 14 iii LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1 MTS Inventory of Transit Stops within Low-Income Areas ............................................ 46 Table 2-2 MTS Inventory of Transit Stops within Minority Areas ................................................... 46 Table 2-3 MTS Inventory of Transit Stops within LIM Areas ........................................................... 46 Table 2-4 NCTD Inventory of Transit Stops within Low-Income Areas ........................................... 47 Table 2-5 NCTD Inventory of
  • North County Transit Dist~Ict EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    North County Transit Dist~Ict EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    STATE OF CALIFORNIA- THE RESOURCES AGENCY GRAY DAVIS, Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION 45 FREMONT STREET, SUITE 2000 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2219 VOICE AND TOO (415) 904-5200 M 14b STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON CONSISTENCY CERTIFICATION Consistency Certification No CC-029-02 Staff JRR-SF File Date 4/19/2002 3 Months 7/19/2002 6 Months 10/19/2002 Commission Meeting 9/9/2002 APPLICANT: North County Transit Dist~ict DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: Oceanside, San Diego County. (Exhibit 1-3) DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: Oceanside-Escondido Rail Project. (Exhibit 4) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The North County Transit District (NCTD) proposes the Oceanside-Escondido Rail Project. The NCTD will convert an existing 22-mile freight rail corridor that runs parallel to State Route 78 (SR-78) into a Diesel Multiple Unit passenger rail system. The existing right of way connects the cities of Oceanside, Vista, San Marcos, Escondido, and unincorporated areas of San Diego County. The project includes the construction of 1. 7 miles of new track to provide service to California State University, San Marcos (inland of the coastal zone). The line will have 15 stations (two that are in the coastal zone) and the system will be single-tracked with three sections of passing track, each 3.5 miles in length. The existing track supports three freight rail round trips per week. After the completion of the proposed project, NTCD will operate a maximum of 72 passenger trains per day in addition to the freight traffic, which will occur at night. The proposed project is consistent with the public access policies of the California Coastal Management Plan (CCMP).
  • REVISED Agenda

    REVISED Agenda

    810 Mission Avenue Oceanside, CA 92054 REVISED (760) 966-6500 (760) 967-2001 (fax) Agenda GoNCTD.com Thursday, April 16, 2020 Regular Meeting: 2:00 P.M. Location: NCTD Administrative Offices, 810 Mission Avenue, Oceanside, CA 92054 View Live Stream at: https://www.youtube.com/GoNCTD COVID-19 PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT AND SPECIAL PROCEDURES: The Governor of California has issued Executive Order N-25-20 (Order) regarding the COVID-19 public health emergency. The Order directs that certain public gatherings should be postponed or canceled. The Governor, through the Order, has provided authority to public agencies to conduct public meetings over teleconference systems where possible. The public may view the meetings online using live streaming at the link: https://www.youtube.com/GoNCTD. Board Members may participate in NCTD Board and/or Committee meetings via teleconference in accordance with the Order. Due to the COVID-19 public health emergency and the order by the State of California public health officials for anyone living in the State to stay home, in person participation at the NCTD Board of Directors meetings will not be allowed. Pursuant to the Order, NCTD is providing alternatives to in-person attendance for viewing and participating in NCTD Board and/or Committee meetings. 1 Members of the public may submit their comments via email at [email protected]. Public comments via email may be received up until the agenda item is called. Large groups wishing to comment on a common item are encouraged to submit comments in writing. Public comments submitted will be provided to the Board/Committee and included in the record of the Board/Committee Meeting.
  • Transit Operations Quarterly Report Q1-FY19[Icon]

    Transit Operations Quarterly Report Q1-FY19[Icon]

    ATTACHMENT 4A Transit Operations Quarterly Report For the Period July 1, 2018 – September 30, 2018 (Q1 of FY19) Page 1 of 46 Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 3 Key Performance Indicators ............................................................................................ 6 Ridership ....................................................................................................................... 14 Farebox Recovery ......................................................................................................... 21 On-Time Performance ................................................................................................... 22 NCTD Customer Feedback ........................................................................................... 23 Paratransit and Fixed-Route Wheelchair Usage ............................................................ 32 Fare Collection System ................................................................................................. 36 Appendix A: BREEZE Descriptions and Service Statistics ............................................ 37 Appendix B: BREEZE Composite Rankings by Day Type ............................................. 40 Appendix C: October Service Change Ridership Trends .............................................. 44 Appendix D: COASTER & SPRINTER Quarterly Performance ..................................... 46 Page 2 of 46 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NCTD produces the
  • Transit Oriented Communities in the San Diego Region

    Transit Oriented Communities in the San Diego Region

    San Diego Association of Governments TRANSIT ORIENTED COMMUNITIES IN THE SAN DIEGO REGION DRAFT - CONTEXT REPORT November 2014 DRAFT TRANSIT ORIENTED COMMUNITIES IN EconomicTHE Context SAN Report DIEGO REGION San Diego Regional TOD Strategy DRAFT - CONTEXT REPORT November 2014October 15, 2014 PREPARED FOR: San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) prepared for: PREPARED BY: SANDAG AECOM REGIONAL TOD STRATEGY Fashion Valley Transit Center in the 1980s. Flickr / SDMTS: https://www.flickr.com/photos/sdmts/13441171155/ TRANSIT-ORIENTED COMMUNITIES IN THE SAN DIEGO REGION: CONTEXT REPORT III SANDAG TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Context of Transit-Oriented Communities in the San Diego Region ........................ 1 2 Setting a Foundation for the Future of Transit-Oriented Communities .................... 5 3 Population, Employment, and Housing Growth in the San Diego Region ������������� 13 4 Regional Transit System and Access to Employment ............................................. 27 5 Local Market Readiness and Development Prototypes .......................................... 47 6 Types of Transit-Oriented Communities ................................................................. 59 7 Trends and Considerations ................................................................................... 67 8 Building a Toolbox ................................................................................................ 73 9 Example TOD Projects in the San Diego Region .................................................... 75 APPENDICES A Description
  • Triennial Security Review of the North County Transit District (Nctd)

    Triennial Security Review of the North County Transit District (Nctd)

    2015 TRIENNIAL SECURITY REVIEW OF THE NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT (NCTD) RAIL TRANSIT SAFETY BRANCH SAFETY AND ENFORCEMENT DIVISION CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 Draft Report October 14, 2016 (PUBLIC-REDACTED) Elizaveta Malashenko, Director Safety and Enforcement Division 2015 TRIENNIAL SECURITY REVIEW OF THE NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT (NCTD) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The California Public Utilities Commission’s Rail Transit Safety Branch (RTSB) staff conducted this system security program review. Staff members directly responsible for conducting review and inspection activities include: Daren Gilbert – Program Manager Stephen Artus – Program and Project Supervisor Noel Takahara – Senior Utilities Engineer Michael Warren – Utilities Engineer Rep to NCTD Joey Bigornia – Utilities Engineer Rupa Shitole – Utilities Engineer Howard Huie – Utilities Engineer i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2 INTRODUCTION 2 3 NCTD BACKGROUND 3 4 REVIEW PROCEDURE 5 5 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS* 6 APPENDICES TABLE 7 A. Acronyms List 8 B. NCTD 2015 Security Review Checklist Index* 9 C. NCTD 2015 Security Review Recommendations List* 10 D. NCTD 2015 Security Review Checklists* 11 ii 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The California Public Utilities Commission’s (Commission) Safety and Enforcement Division (SED), Rail Transit Safety Branch staff (Staff) conducted an on-site security review of the North County Transit District (NCTD) on August 25, 2015. The review focused on verifying the effective implementation of the System Security and Emergency Preparedness Plan, addressing Threat & Vulnerability Assessment (TVA), and emergency response procedures. Following the on-site security review, staff held a post-review conference with NCTD personnel on September 10, 2015. Staff provided the NCTD Chief of Transit Security a preliminary summary report detailing the on-site review Findings.
  • 5 General Plan Conformance

    5 General Plan Conformance

    5 General Plan Conformance Newland Sierra Specific Plan 5 GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE 5.1 San Diego County General Plan The San Diego County General Plan contains six elements, each with a series of goals that are supported by policies that address how the goal is to be accomplished. These goals and policies flow from the Guiding Principles, which are stated in Chapter 2 of the General Plan (County of San Diego 2011a). A summary of how the project will comply with the Guiding Principles and each element of the General Plan is provided below. 5.1.1 Guiding Principles 5.1.1.1 Support a reasonable share of projected regional population growth The project will provide a range of housing types to aid the County in meeting required regional housing needs for projected population growth. The amount and type of housing was assessed in the context of the County’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment, housing sites inventory, and other housing projects within the County’s jurisdiction. 5.1.1.2 Promote health and sustainability by locating new growth near existing and planned infrastructure, services, and jobs in a compact pattern of development The project’s parks, recreational opportunities, commercial/retail uses, and school site; mix of housing types, including age-qualified and age-targeted (single-story) housing; walkable and bicycle-friendly neighborhoods; trails and pathways; large blocks of native habitat preserve and open space; a Community-sponsored electric bike-share program; and shuttle services within the project Site and to the Escondido Transit Center will make it a Community that promotes and enhances the health and sustainability of its residents, guests, employees, and patrons.
  • BREEZE Accidents by Category

    BREEZE Accidents by Category

    ATTACHMENT 4A April 1, 2018 – June 30, 2018 Safety and Security Division Quarterly Report For the Period April 1, 2018 – June 30, 2018 (Q4 of FY 2018) April 1, 2018 – June 30, 2018 Contents FY 2018 Annual Safety and Security Summary .......................................... 3 Safety and Security Performance Metrics ................................................... 5 Preventable Accidents ................................................................................ 6 Non-Preventable Accidents ........................................................................ 7 Rail Accidents ............................................................................................. 8 BREEZE Accidents by Category ............................................................... 10 San Diego Subdivision Overview .............................................................. 12 Escondido Subdivision Overview .............................................................. 15 Part 1 Crimes ............................................................................................ 18 Law Enforcement Activities April – June 2018 .......................................... 19 Assaults .................................................................................................... 20 Fare Validation .......................................................................................... 21 Page 2 of 21 April 1, 2018 – June 30, 2018 FY2018 Annual Safety and Security Summary For FY2018, NCTD had no preventable accidents on COASTER or SPRINTER, and

  • 006 Q1FY21 Safety Report[Icon]

    July 1, 2020 – September 30, 2020 ATTACHMENT 6A Safety Division Quarterly Report For the Period July 1, 2020 – September 30, 2020 (Q1 of FY2021) July 1, 2020 – September 30, 2020 Contents Quarter 1 FY2021 Safety Performance Metrics ........................................................... 3 Preventable Accidents ................................................................................................. 5 Non-Preventable Accidents ......................................................................................... 6 Rail Accidents .............................................................................................................. 7 BREEZE Accidents by Category ................................................................................. 9 San Diego Subdivision Overview ............................................................................... 11 Escondido Subdivision Overview ............................................................................... 14 NCTD Safety Division Activity .................................................................................... 17 Page 2 of 17 July 1, 2020 – September 30, 2020 Quarter 1 FY2021 Safety Performance Metrics For the first quarter of FY2021 when compared to fourth quarter FY2020, preventable accidents trended down for SPRINTER and up for BREEZE. There was no change for LIFT/FLEX while COASTER preventable accidents remained at zero. Non-preventable accidents trended up for BREEZE and remained at zero for COASTER and SPRINTER. There was no change in non-preventable