Corridor Analysis of Interstate 85: Greenville and Spartanburg Counties

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Corridor Analysis of Interstate 85: Greenville and Spartanburg Counties CORRIDOR AN A LYSIS OF INTERST A TE 85: GREENVILLE A ND SP A RT A NBUR G COUNTIES Travel demand is the collective desire by a wide array of motorists to drive on a highway. High travel demand in concentrated time periods such as during the morning commute results in a “rush hour” (peak hours). When the demand is close to or exceeds the capacity of the roadway, congestion results. Travel demand management (TDM) is a deliberate attempt to influence the number of vehicles attempting to use the highway at a particular time. This chapter explores a number of strategies that have the potential to decrease travel demand and thereby decrease congestion, particularly in the peak hours. Each strategy is identified with the label “TDM” followed by a number in order to track these strategies throughout this report. 7.1 TRAVEL INFORMATION SERVICES (TDM1 AND TDM2) Dynamic Message Signs (TDM1) Roadway information can be provided through on road signing, advising motorist of special conditions in the immediate vicinity or well in advance of an actual event. This information is displayed using CH A PTER 7: TR A VEL DEM A ND MA N ag EMENT Variable Message Signs (VMS) or Dynamic Message Signs (DMS). VMS signs are portable, shoulder mounted signs and DMS signs are permanent, structures mounted over the roadway. Generally VMS signs warn of special conditions such as lane closures due to construction or other incidents. DMS signs may be used for incidents, but also may be used to convey travel times to significant interchanges along the route. The travel times displayed take into account the actual prevailing speed of traffic and are adjusted to account for congestion along the route. The signs may also be used to provide information such as Amber Alerts to advise of child abductions in the area. In the study area there are currently five VMS signs and three DMS signs. Additional DMS signs would be beneficial to the public and to incident responders advising of incidents ahead that require lane closures or detours. It is recommended that five new DMS signs be considered at the following locations in order of priority: • I-85 NB between I-385 and Pelham Road (locate approximately 4,000 feet north of the Roper Mountain Road) • I-85 SB between Woodruff Road and Laurens Road (locate approximately 1,000 feet south of the Salters Road) Prepared by Civil Engineering Consulting Services, Inc. for the South Carolina Department of Transportation 46 CORRIDOR AN A LYSIS OF INTERST A TE 85: GREENVILLE A ND SP A RT A NBUR G COUNTIES • I-85 NB between SC 101 and SC 290 (locate approximately 1,000 feet north of the Dantzler Major Employers Road overpass) One important aspect of the outreach process was identification and involvement of the major employers in the study area. Some of these were included in the stakeholder group and one was on both the • I-85 SB between SC 290 and SC 101 (erect on the same structure as the sign described stakeholder group and the steering committee. Input from these major employers was especially above) important in research on the rideshare programs as well as freight handling. • I-85 NB south of US 25 (locate approximately 1,000 feet south of SC 20) Major employers in the area include: SCDOT Website Enhancement (TDM2) • Hubbell Lighting • Blue Ridge Electric Cooperative SCDOT currently has a variety of ways to communicate travel conditions throughout the state. • BMW Manufacturing • Fluor Corporation • Greenville-Spartanburg Airport • Sealed Air Corp – Cryovac Division Through its website at www.scdot.org motorists can access SCDOT’s traffic cameras, get updates on • Michelin North America • General Electric construction activities, road conditions, evacuation routes and weather conditions. It is recommended • Furman University • C&S Wholesale – Bi-Lo Grocery Distribution that information on existing Park & Ride facilities, transit opportunities, and Rideshare programs be • Greenville Technical College • Campbell Center added to the SCDOT website. This information should be updated as new facilities and opportunities • Lockheed Martin Aircraft & Logistics • Jacobs Engineering Group are implemented. • Clemson University International Center for Automotive Research 7.2 511 SERVICE (TDM3) Major Traffic Generators SCDOT has deployed a new travel information service, 511, which will provide Traffic congestion along the corridor is continually worsening with delays becoming more numerous motorists a source of up to date travel conditions by route for all Interstate and peak rush hours getting longer. Exhibit 48 lists the number of employees for some of the major routes in the state. This information can be accessed by dialing 511. This employers previously listed. None of these companies have formal rideshare or carpooling programs, information can also be accessed by computer before beginning a trip. Email although several expressed interest in possibly implementing such programs. One company had a alerts can also be provided to subscribers of the service. There is no charge formal program for several years but was unable to continue with it due to logistical problems with for the service other than the subscribed personal cell phone service. It is recommended that SCDOT employees on overtime. continue to improve the customer friendliness of the system and refer users to the SCDOT website for additional information. Exhibit 48: Number Employed by Major Employers within Study Area COMP A NY NUMBER OF I-85 CORRIDOR EMPLOYEES EXIT NO. 7.3 OUTREACH AND EDUCATION (TDM4) Hubbell Lighting 480 51 BMW Manufacturing 7000 58 & 60 As mentioned in Chapter 6, an important component of this study has been public and community Greenville-Spartanburg Airport 650 56 & 57 involvement. In addition to the public and community outreach efforts, major employers and traffic Michelin North America 4000 54 generators were specifically targeted through surveys and interviews. Jacobs Engineering Group 600 51 Furman University 3300 48 Greenville Technical College 1500 46 Prepared by Civil Engineering Consulting Services, Inc. for the South Carolina Department of Transportation 47 CORRIDOR AN A LYSIS OF INTERST A TE 85: GREENVILLE A ND SP A RT A NBUR G COUNTIES A program to engage the major employers and traffic generators along the corridor should be established. planning that companies currently use to avoid corridor congestion are limiting the number of trucks With the lack of formal rideshare or carpooling programs, there is a great opportunity to reach out to dispatched at rush hours, using secondary and other primary roads to avoid congestion on I-85, and these employers and their employees to make them aware of the opportunities that exist for sharing using dispatch information for truckers to avoid congestion areas and accident areas. Additional freight rides. Outreach efforts should include discussions with management to determine their level of interest trip planning encouragement from transportation planning agencies is unlikely to result in significant and support, and the best way to share information with the employees. reductions in truck traffic during peak hours. This outreach and education effort has potential benefits for both employer and employee in the form of Recommended improvements garnered from the surveys include: reduced congestion on I-85 and local routes, improved on-time arrival of employees, and reduced travel • Additional lanes in each direction cost to employees. A partnership of transportation planners and providers working in cooperation with major employers should educate the employees on options other than driving alone. These options • Additional truck parking in order to wait out peak hours when delivery schedules allow include transit, park and ride lots, carpooling, or developing ridesharing programs. Based on the • A parallel route to I-85 opportunities that exist today, this outreach effort has the potential to reduce peak hour traffic by 1%. As incentives such as increased fuel prices and employers’ encouragement increase, the potential for • Improved designs such as longer entrance and exit ramps, wider lane widths, and improved employees to share rides will be increased and the impacts on traffic could increase well beyond the signage 1%. All of the above survey recommendations are discussed and evaluated in more detail in other sections of this report. 7.4 FREIGHT TRIP PLANNING (TDM5) 7.5 TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TDM6) Another major contributor to traffic in the corridor is freight movement, both through the corridor and locally, especially to the manufacturing plants listed in Exhibit 48. Truck traffic makes up approximately Transit oriented development (TOD) is defined as compact, mixed-use development within easy walking 28% of the traffic volumes in the corridor study area; however, it is difficult to determine what percentage distance of public transportation and is a key element of livable, sustainable communities. TOD is is passing through as compared to delivering in the area. about creating communities where people have transportation and housing choices, where people can walk, ride a bike, and take public transit on a daily basis. Creating a convenient and affordable As previously stated in Chapter 6, a freight survey was conducted in order to determine the potential lifestyle where housing, employment, entertainment, and restaurants are conveniently located and to reduce and/or reschedule freight trips during peak traffic hours as well as gather information and easily reached by modes of travel other than private automobiles. identify locations along the corridor where improvements are needed to facilitate freight movements. A list of freight moving companies in the area was compiled using information from the South Carolina Land use and development planning Trucking Association and the major employers in the area. A survey questionnaire was developed activities are primarily the responsibility and over 100 surveys were sent to the identified companies. In addition to the surveys noted above, and purview of local governments. Local several industries or associations were contacted directly for input.
Recommended publications
  • Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) 2040
    Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) 2040 4.1 Roads and Highways Element The largest part of the transportation system is a roadway network of more than 7,000 lane miles and is comprised of NCDOT maintained roads, locally maintained roads, and private roads. In late 2013 the metropolitan area boundary for the High Point MPO increased in size to include the remaining portion of Davidson County not already included in an MPO. This substantially expanded the roadway network for the MPO. Radial movements that are strongest in the MPO are: • Towards Greensboro and Jamestown to the northeast, • Towards Winston-Salem from High Point to the northwest via Interstate 74, • Towards the Piedmont Triad International Airport to the north via NC 68, • Towards Lexington from High Point to the southwest via Interstate 85 and US 29/70, and • Towards Winston-Salem from Lexington via US 52. • There is some radial demand between High Point, Thomasville, Archdale, Trinity, and Wallburg. Heavily traveled routes include: • Eastchester Drive (NC 68), towards Piedmont Triad International Airport • Westchester Drive and National Highway (NC 68), towards Thomasville • NC 109 • Main Street in High Point, • Main Street in Archdale, • US 311 Bypass, • Interstate 85, • US 29-70, • Wendover Avenue, • Main Street and NC 8 in and around Lexington, • High Point - Greensboro Road, and 4.1 Roads and Highways Element • Surrett Drive. Chapter: 1 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) 2040 The projects in the Roadway Element of the Transportation Plan come from the Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) for the High Point Urbanized Area. The differences between the Roadway Element of the MTP and the CTP include: • The MTP is required by Federal Law, CTP is mandated by the North Carolina Department of Transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate 85 Widening and Improvements Spartanburg And
    Interstate 85 Widening and Improvements Mile Marker 80 – 96 Spartanburg and Cherokee Counties Environmental Assessment SCDOT NEPA ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS Date: 10/12/2015 FORM Project ID : 027114 County : Cherokee District : District 4 Doc Type: EA Total # of 12 Commitments: Project Name: I‐85 Widening (MM80‐96) The Environmental Commitment Contractor Responsible measures listed below are to be included in the contract and must be implemented. It is the responsibility of the Program Manager to make sure the Environmental Commitment SCDOT Responsible measures are adhered to. If there are questions regarding the commitments listed please contact: CONTACT NAME: Mr. Brad Reynolds PHONE #: (803)‐737‐1440 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS FOR THE PROJECT Water Quality Responsibility: CONTRACTOR The contractor will be required to minimize possible water quality impacts through implementation of construction BMPs, reflecting policies contained in 23 CFR 650B and the Department's Supplemental Specifications on Seeding and Erosion Control Measures (Latest Edition). Other measures including seeding, silt fences, sediment basins, etc. as appropriate will be implemented during construction to minimize impacts to Water Quality. Non‐Standard Commitment Responsibility: CONTRACTOR Floodplains The selected contractor will send a set of final plans and request for floodplain management compliance to the local County Floodplain Administrator. A hydraulic analysis will be performed for each encroachment of a FEMA‐regulated floodplain and a detailed hydraulic analysis
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
    [Show full text]
  • Roadside Flowers by Josh Shaffer Photography by Joey and Jessica Seawell
    Roadside Flowers By Josh Shaffer Photography by Joey and Jessica Seawell The Department of Transportation’s wildflower program brings back-road scenery to North Carolina’s busiest highways. Little of beauty shows up on the side of a highway. It’s where cars break down. It’s where hitchhikers stand. It’s where litterbugs toss drink cans and cigarette butts. There’s nothing much to see but a gas station sign on a pole, a shredded tire from a tractor- Multicolored wildflowers catch the eyes of motorists traveling down U.S. Highways trailer, or the remains of an 52 near Rural Hall unlucky deer. Nobody fusses much about these places, places we pass in a hurry on the way to somewhere prettier. But for 27 years, North Carolina has persisted with the stubborn idea that those humdrum strips of road should offer some reward beyond six lanes and reflective highway markers. A driver crossing the state on Interstate 40 should see more than asphalt and weeds between Wilmington and Asheville. The hot, flat ribbons linking Raleigh and Charlotte ought to show off scenery more often found in meadows — the catchflies, the toadflax, the oxeye daisies. As a driver, the sudden flash of red from an acre of corn poppies ought to make you pull off on the roadside, stop the car, step over the bits of gravel and broken glass, and walk knee-deep into the blooms. Even in this budget-slashing era, the North Carolina Department of Transportation still treats 1,500 acres of lowly roadside as the state’s flower garden.
    [Show full text]
  • 1000 Abernathy Road Northpark 400, Suite 100 Atlanta, GA 30328 (770) 671-0006
    1000 Abernathy Road Northpark 400, Suite 100 Atlanta, GA 30328 (770) 671-0006 www.lhh.com Directions to Lee Hecht Harrison: From Interstate 75 Interstate 75 to 285 East. Travel approximately 7 miles to Exit 27 Georgia 400 Toll Road North to Exit 5A Abernathy Road. Turn left at 2nd light onto Peachtree Dunwoody Road. Northpark 400 is on the left. From 75/85 Downtown 85 North to Georgia 400 Toll Road. Exit 5A Abernathy Road. Turn left at 2nd light onto Peachtree Dunwoody Road. Northpark 400 is on the left. From Interstate 85 Interstate 85 to 285 West. Travel approximately 7 miles to Exit 27 Georgia 400 Toll Road North. Exit 5A Abernathy Road. Turn left at 2nd light onto Peachtree Dunwoody Road. Northpark 400 is on the left and Northpark 500 and 600 are on the right. From Georgia 400 traveling South Take Georgia 400 Toll Road to exit 5 Sandy Springs / Abernathy Road. Turn left, under freeway bridge, make left at 2nd light onto Peachtree Dunwoody Road. Northpark 400 is on the left. From 285 285 East or West to Exit 27 Georgia 400 Toll Road North. Exit 5A Abernathy Road. Turn left at 2nd light onto Peachtree Dunwoody Road. Northpark 400 is on the left. From Interstate 20 East of 285 Take Interstate 20 West to 285 North to Exit 27 Georgia 400 Toll Road North. Exit 5A Abernathy Road. Turn left at 2nd light onto Peachtree Dunwoody Road. Northpark 400 is on the left. From Interstate 20 West of 285 Take Interstate 20 East to 285 North to Exit 27 Georgia 400 Toll Road North.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of State Speed Laws
    DOT HS 810 826 August 2007 Summary of State Speed Laws Tenth Edition Current as of January 1, 2007 This document is available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161 This publication is distributed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, in the interest of information exchange. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Department of Transportation or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. If trade or manufacturers' names or products are mentioned, it is because they are considered essential to the object of the publication and should not be construed as an endorsement. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...................................................iii Missouri ......................................................138 Alabama..........................................................1 Montana ......................................................143 Alaska.............................................................5 Nebraska .....................................................150 Arizona ...........................................................9 Nevada ........................................................157 Arkansas .......................................................15 New
    [Show full text]
  • I-85 MM 96-106 Hazardous Materials Draft
    I-85 Widening Project Cherokee County, South Carolina Phase I Environmental Site Assessment September 14, 2015 ARM Project #16-314-15 Prepared For: HDR | ICA 501 Huger Street Columbia, SC 29201 1210 1st STREET SOUTH EXTENSION / COLUMBIA, SC 29209 / phone 803-783-3314 fax 803-783-2587 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 - Summary Page 1 2.0 - Introduction Page 4 3.0 - Site Description Page 6 4.0 – User Provided Information Page 7 5.0 – Records Review Page 8 6.0 – Site Reconnaissance Page 19 7.0 – Interviews Page 20 8.0 – Findings Page 21 9.0 – Opinion Page 21 10.0 – Conclusions Page 22 11.0 – Deviations Page 25 12.0 – Additional Services Page 25 13.0 – References Page 25 14.0 – Signature(s) of Environmental Professional(s) Page 26 15.0 – Qualifications of Environmental Professional(s) Page 26 16.0 – Warranty Page 26 17.0 – Appendices 17.1 Site (Vicinity) Map – Figure 1 17.2 Site Plan – Figure 2 17.3 Site Photographs 17.4 Historical Research Documentation 17.5 Regulatory Records Documentation 17.6 Interview Documentation 17.7 Special Contractual Conditions Between User and Environmental Professional 17.8 Qualifications of the Environmental Professional I-85 Widening Project, Cherokee Co. SC ARM Project No. 12-314-15 Phase I ESA September 14, 2015 1.0 Summary ARM Environmental Services, Inc. (ARM) has completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of a corridor study area along Interstate 85 (I-85), from a point approximately 1 mile northeast of SC 18 to the South Carolina / North Carolina border, located in Cherokee County, South Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Report of Gifts (133 Pages) South Caroliniana Library--University of South Carolina
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons University South Caroliniana Society - Annual South Caroliniana Library Report of Gifts 4-29-2006 2006 Report of Gifts (133 pages) South Caroliniana Library--University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/scs_anpgm Part of the Library and Information Science Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation University South Caroliniana Society. (2006). "2006 Report of Gifts." Columbia, SC: The ocS iety. This Newsletter is brought to you by the South Caroliniana Library at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in University South Caroliniana Society - Annual Report of Gifts yb an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The The South Carolina South Caroliniana College Library Library 1840 1940 THE UNIVERSITY SOUTH CAROLINIANA SOCIETY SEVENTIETH ANNUAL MEETING UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA Saturday, April 29, 2006 Mr. Steve Griffith, President, Presiding Reception and Exhibit .............................. 11:00 a.m. South Caroliniana Library Luncheon .......................................... 1:00 p.m. Capstone Campus Room Business Meeting Welcome Reports of the Executive Council and Secretary-Treasurer Address .................................... Dr. A.V. Huff, Jr. 2006 Report of Gifts to the South Caroliniana Library by Members of the Society Announced at the 70th Meeting of the University South Caroliniana Society (the Friends of the Library) Annual Program 29 April 2006 A Life of Public Service: Interviews with John Carl West - 2005 Keynote Address by Gordon E. Harvey Gifts of Manuscript South Caroliniana Gifts of Printed South Caroliniana Gifts of Pictorial South Caroliniana South Caroliniana Library (Columbia, SC) A special collection documenting all periods of South Carolina history.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Potential Freeway Segments for Dedicated Truck Lanes
    Identifying Potential Freeway Segments for Dedicated Truck Lanes Submitted By: Christopher J. Espiritu A Thesis Quality Research Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Masters of Science in Transportation Management Mineta Transportation Institute San Jose State University June 2013 Acknowledgements My greatest appreciation goes to Dr. Peter Haas and Rod Diridon for guiding me through this process. A special thank you goes to Dr. Nick Compin and Dr. Amelia Regan for their guidance and support of this project. My appreciation also goes to the representatives of the Caltrans Traffic Data Branch, Georgia DOT, Virginia DOT, Washington DOT, Oregon DOT, and NJ DOT; this project would not be possible without your great work. A special thank you also goes to Viviann Ferea for all the help and support over the last couple of years. This is dedicated to my loving family. To my sister (Charity) and my brother‐in‐law (Dave), for their unfailing support and encouragement. To my beloved Susan, for her support and patience. And finally, this is dedicated to my mother (Deborah), who I have dearly missed over the last year and a half since starting this program. Page 2 Table of Contents BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 8 RESEARCH FOCUS .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate Highway System
    _)OT North Carolina State Library N. C. Kl -· Raleigh Doc. 2 :I6/ c. 2. NORTH CAROLINA'S MAY 18 1976 INTERSTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM DESIGNED FOR: ■ SAFETY ■ CONVENIENCE ■ ECONOMY N. C. STATE HIGHWAY COMMl~IOH ' .• , •• 't' • • A S'IUDY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1 S INTERSTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM STATE HIGHWAY COM11ISSION RJBLIC RELATIONS JULY, 1958 THE INTER STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM ~ ~ l..J ~ C) (.) ~ ...... ' " "'.... ~ \.) ~ ,q l\. -\" ~ The national system of interstate and defense highways ties togethe r the centers of populatio n and ind ustry throughout the Un ited States. NATIONAL SYSTEM OF INTERSTATE AND DEFENSE HIGHWAYS ttThe greatest public works program in man's history." That phrase has often been used to describe the scope of the Interstate Highway Program, made possible by Congress with the passage of the 11Federal Highway Act of 1956tt. The Congress levied an extra one cent tax per gallon on motor fuels, as well as an additional tax on certain automobile accessories, to make available funds for the hl,000 mile network of superhighways which ~ome experts estimate will eventually cost more than 50 billions of dollars. The Interstate System is the dream plan of transportation and civil engi­ neers alike and is being designed to carry traffic loads of future generations, as well as the growing demand of today. Interstate Highways are being built with the full realization that America is a mobile nation which must have adequate trans­ portation facilities if its way of life is to be improved and expanded. Best of all, the Interstate System is being built with the higt,wa} user in mind-safety features are DESIGNED IN and traffic bottlenecks and delay points are DESIGNED aJT.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing Building 13 the Newest
    INTRODUCING BUILDING 13 THE NEWEST DEVELOPMENT AT ONE OF THE MOST ESTABLISHED OFFICE CAMPUSES IN NORTH DRUID HILLS PEACHTREE CORNERS MARIETTA DUNWOODY NORCROSS SANDY SPRINGS DEKALB PEACHTREE AIRPORT LILBURN SMYRNA VININGS BROOKHAVEN BUCKHEAD Corporate Square Office Park is a 10-building office campus totaling over 600,000 square feet of office NORTH DRUID STONE space prominently located in the Druid Hills submarket HILLS MOUNTAIN between I-85 and Buford Highway, within 10 minutes of both Buckhead and Midtown. MIDTOWN WEST MIDTOWN DECATUR Developed in phases from 1967 to 1971, the office park has been institutionally maintained and operated DOWNTOWN throughout its history, earning Energy Star ratings in majority of the buildings. Benefiting from its central location, the campus environment provides functional office space appealing to tenants of all sizes, ample GRANT PARK parking, an on-site cafe and great access to metro- Atlanta at cost effective rental rates. DRIVE TIMES from Corporate Square Interstate 85 3 Minutes Interstate 75 6 Minutes Interstate 285 8 Minutes Dekalb Peachtree Airport 11 Minutes HARTSFIELD JACKSON Georgia 400 11 Minutes INTERNATIONAL Interstate 20 15 Minutes AIRPORT Downtown Atlanta 15 Minutes Hartsfield Jackson International Airport 23 Minutes 145,000 Square Feet 26,000 Square Feet Typical Floorplate Up to Six Stores 4.3 per 1,000 Parking Ratio Highway Signage Opportunity Over 235,000 daily cars on I-85 Build-to-Suit Available Value-Office™ Construction Can be built for 10 − 20% less cost and time than traditional construction Outdoor Amenities Conference and café spaces, projection televisions, lawn games, and fire pits GROUND FLOOR SECOND FLOOR 14,686 RSF 21,863 RSF Amenities Lobby Lobby Below THIRD FLOOR FOURTH & FIFTH FLOOR 24,583 RSF 24,793 RSF SIXTH FLOOR ROOF 24,451 RSF TENANT BALCONY INSPIRATION IMAGERY Rooftop access complete with a unique dinning experience, full bar, and lounge.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Management for Major Highway Reconstruction
    Transportation Management for Major Highway Reconstruction Proceedigs of.the National Conference on Corridor Traffic Management for Major Highway Reconstruction Chicago, Illinois September :2&Octbber 1, 1986 NAS. NAE t1OM TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL 1987 TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OFFICERS Chairman: Lowell B. Jackson, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Highways, Denver Vice Chairman: Herbert H. Richardson, Vice Chancellor and Dean of Engineering, Texas A&M University System, College Station Executive Director: Thomas B. Been, Transportation Research Board MEMBERS Ray A. Barnhart, Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) John A. Clements, Vice President, Sverdrup Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts (ex officio, Past Chairman, 1985) Donald D. Engen, Vice Admiral, U.S. Navy (retired), Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) Francis B. Francois, Executive Director, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D:C. (ex officio) E. R. (Vald) Heiberg Ill, Chief of Enginers and Commander U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, D.C. (ex officio) Lester A. Hoel, Hamilton Professor and Chairman, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville (ex officio, Past Chairman, 1986) Ralph L. Stanley, Administrator, Urban Mass Transportation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) Diane Steed, Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) George H. Way, Jr., Vice President, Research and Test Department, Association of American Railroads,Washinglon, D.C. (ex officio) Alan A. Altshuler, Dean, Graduate School of Public Administration, New York University, New York John R. Borchert, Regents Professor, Department of Geography, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Robert 0: Bugher, Executive Director, American Public Works Association, Chicago, Illinois Dana F.
    [Show full text]