Summary of State Speed Laws

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Summary of State Speed Laws DOT HS 810 826 August 2007 Summary of State Speed Laws Tenth Edition Current as of January 1, 2007 This document is available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161 This publication is distributed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, in the interest of information exchange. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Department of Transportation or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. If trade or manufacturers' names or products are mentioned, it is because they are considered essential to the object of the publication and should not be construed as an endorsement. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...................................................iii Missouri ......................................................138 Alabama..........................................................1 Montana ......................................................143 Alaska.............................................................5 Nebraska .....................................................150 Arizona ...........................................................9 Nevada ........................................................157 Arkansas .......................................................15 New Hampshire ..........................................163 California......................................................21 New Jersey..................................................168 Colorado .......................................................30 New Mexico................................................175 Connecticut...................................................35 New York....................................................180 Delaware.......................................................39 North Carolina ............................................187 District of Columbia.....................................45 North Dakota ..............................................194 Florida...........................................................49 Ohio ............................................................200 Georgia .........................................................55 Oklahoma....................................................206 Hawaii...........................................................61 Oregon ........................................................212 Idaho.............................................................66 Pennsylvania...............................................218 Illinois...........................................................71 Rhode Island ...............................................223 Indiana ..........................................................78 South Carolina ............................................229 Iowa ..............................................................84 South Dakota ..............................................234 Kansas...........................................................90 Tennessee....................................................239 Kentucky.......................................................95 Texas...........................................................244 Louisiana ......................................................99 Utah.............................................................250 Maine..........................................................105 Vermont ......................................................255 Maryland.....................................................110 Virginia.......................................................260 Massachusetts.............................................116 Washington.................................................267 Michigan.....................................................121 West Virginia..............................................273 Minnesota ...................................................128 Wisconsin ...................................................279 Mississippi..................................................134 Wyoming ....................................................286 Uniform Vehicle Code (UVC)....................290 i SPEED 2006 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE Minimum Speed Rule: The Minimum Speed Rule prohibits a person from operating a motor vehicle This summary reports ONLY the status of State at such a slow speed as to impede the normal and statutes or regulations that are concerned with reasonable movement of traffic. However, in either speed limit or speed-related violations. order to avoid a possible conflict with the basic Local laws are not reported. Unless otherwise speed rule, the law normally provides that a slow indicated, the status of the State laws or speed is permissible when "reduced speed is regulations reported is January 1, 2006. necessary for safe operation or in compliance with law." See Uniform Vehicle Code §11-805(a). ORGANIZATION Racing on the Highway: "Racing on the highway" The summary is divided into two areas: (1) is usually defined as driving "any vehicle in any Introduction; (2) a State-by-State-Analysis. The race, speed competition or contest, drag race or State-by-State Analysis is organized by State and acceleration contest, test of physical endurance, then by specific legal topics. The State-by-State exhibition of speed or acceleration, or for the Analysis includes code and case law citations; purpose of making a speed record." See Uniform these should help individuals conducting Vehicle Code §11-809(a). additional research in this area of the law. The State-by-State Analysis can be used to facilitate Drag Racing: Either as part of the offense of the comparison of State laws in the subject areas. highway racing or as a separate statutory crime, the offense of "drag racing" is normally defined as The Appendix, using the State-by-State analysis "the operation of two or more vehicles from a format, gives the Uniform Vehicle Code’s point side by side at accelerating speed in provisions on speed limit and speed-related competitive attempt to outdistance each other, or offenses. the operation of one or more vehicles over a common selected course, from the same point to EXPLANATIONS the same point, for the purpose of comparing the relative speeds or power of acceleration of such Basic Speed Rule: The Basic Speed Rule requires vehicles or vehicles within a certain distance or vehicle operators to drive at a speed that is time limit." See Uniform Vehicle Code §11- reasonable and prudent. As a corollary to this 809(b). rule, State laws usually provide that "every person shall drive at a safe and appropriate speed when Reckless Driving: "Reckless driving" is normally approaching and crossing an intersection or defined as driving "any vehicle in willful or railroad grade crossing, when approaching and wanton disregard for the safety of persons or going around a curve, when approaching a hill property." See Uniform Vehicle Code §11-901(a). crest, when traveling upon any narrow or winding Note: Speed is not necessarily a factor in this roadway, and when special hazards exist with offense. respect to pedestrians or other traffic or by reason of weather or highway conditions." See Uniform Vehicle Code §11-801. ii SPEED 2006 INTRODUCTION (continued) Statutory Speed Limit: A "statutory speed limit" Speed Law Sanctions: Except as noted, the is one specifically provided for under a State's criminal and administrative licensing sanctions traffic code (rules of the road). Such limits may given are the same for any offense listed under the vary by highway type (e.g., interstate) or by heading "Basis for a Speed Law Violation." location (e.g., urban district). State laws may or Important: The fine sanctions listed in this may not require that these limits be posted. summary do not include court costs or bail schedule forfeitures. Posted (Maximum) Speed Limit: Even though specific speed limits may have been established Highway and Street: In order to insure that the via legislation, State laws usually allow either terms "highway" and "street" are synonymous and State or local authorities to set highway speed interchangeable, many State laws defined both as limits above or below the statutory ones. Prior to "[t]he entire width between the boundary lines of taking such action on any portion of a highway, every way publicly maintained when any part the law normally requires that governmental thereof is open to the use of the public for authorities conduct a study to determine the safe purposes of vehicular travel." See Uniform speed limit for that part of the highway. State Vehicle Code §§1-127 and 1-183. laws may also allow such authorities to specify different speed limits on all or selected highways FEEDBACK and FUTURE EDITIONS (or portions thereof) either for various times of the day or for various types of vehicles (e.g., trucks). Requests for future editions of or comments about this summary should be sent to: Speed limits established under these laws are not effective until appropriate speed limit signs are National Highway Traffic Safety Administration posted on the highway. Caution: This summary Enforcement and Justice Services Division (NTI- does not report the speed limits that have been 122) established via such laws. 400 Seventh Street SW. Washington, DC 20590 Telephone: 202-366-9588
Recommended publications
  • Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) 2040
    Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) 2040 4.1 Roads and Highways Element The largest part of the transportation system is a roadway network of more than 7,000 lane miles and is comprised of NCDOT maintained roads, locally maintained roads, and private roads. In late 2013 the metropolitan area boundary for the High Point MPO increased in size to include the remaining portion of Davidson County not already included in an MPO. This substantially expanded the roadway network for the MPO. Radial movements that are strongest in the MPO are: • Towards Greensboro and Jamestown to the northeast, • Towards Winston-Salem from High Point to the northwest via Interstate 74, • Towards the Piedmont Triad International Airport to the north via NC 68, • Towards Lexington from High Point to the southwest via Interstate 85 and US 29/70, and • Towards Winston-Salem from Lexington via US 52. • There is some radial demand between High Point, Thomasville, Archdale, Trinity, and Wallburg. Heavily traveled routes include: • Eastchester Drive (NC 68), towards Piedmont Triad International Airport • Westchester Drive and National Highway (NC 68), towards Thomasville • NC 109 • Main Street in High Point, • Main Street in Archdale, • US 311 Bypass, • Interstate 85, • US 29-70, • Wendover Avenue, • Main Street and NC 8 in and around Lexington, • High Point - Greensboro Road, and 4.1 Roads and Highways Element • Surrett Drive. Chapter: 1 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) 2040 The projects in the Roadway Element of the Transportation Plan come from the Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) for the High Point Urbanized Area. The differences between the Roadway Element of the MTP and the CTP include: • The MTP is required by Federal Law, CTP is mandated by the North Carolina Department of Transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Facts
    Interlock Device Requirements, Cont’d New Jersey *New Jersey Statutes Annotated COURT IMPOSED FINES AND PENALTIES Third offense Motor Vehicle Commission Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol or Refusing the Chemical Test, Cont’d • 1-3 years installation of interlock device after restoration of Drugs (DUI) driving privilege; or Third and Subsequent Offenses • 10 year suspension of registration privileges A person who operates a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol • 10 years driving privilege suspension concentration (BAC) of 0.08% or above is considered to be • $1,000 fine Surcharges - Alcohol Violations driving under the influence. • 12 hours minimum IDRC In addition to the court imposed fines and penalties, anyone First Offense - BAC 0.08% but less than 0.10% Refusing Chemical Test in School Zone or Crossing convicted of DUI or chemical test refusal is subject to: NEW JERSEY • 3 months driving privilege suspension • an insurance surcharge of $1,000 a year for three years First Offense • $250-$400 fine ($3,000) for the first and second conviction within a • 1 to 2 years driving privilege suspension • 12-48 hours at intoxicated driver resource center (IDRC) three-year period. • $600-$1,000 fine FACTS • Maximum 30 days imprisonment • an insurance surcharge of $1,500 a year for three years • 12 hours minimum IDRC ($4,500) for a third offense within a three-year period. First Offense - BAC 0.10% or higher Second Offense • a single $100 DUI enforcement surcharge that must be • 7 months to1 year driving privilege suspension • 4 years driving privilege suspension paid to the court with the required fine upon conviction.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Review Questions
    Chapter 3 - Learning to Drive PA Driver’s Manual CHAPTER 3 REVIEW QUESTIONS 1. TEENAGE DRIVERS ARE MORE LIKELY TO BE INVOLVED IN A CRASH WHEN: A. They are driving with their pet as a passenger B. They are driving with adult passengers C. They are driving with teenage passengers D. They are driving without any passengers 2. DRIVERS WHO EAT AND DRINK WHILE DRIVING: A. Have no driving errors B. Have trouble driving slow C. Are better drivers because they are not hungry D. Have trouble controlling their vehicles 3. PREPARING TO SMOKE AND SMOKING WHILE DRIVING: A. Do not affect driving abilities B. Help maintain driver alertness C. Are distracting activities D. Are not distracting activities 4. THE TOP MAJOR CRASH TYPE FOR 16 YEAR OLD DRIVERS IN PENNSYLVANIA IS: A. Single vehicle/run-off-the-road B. Being sideswiped on an interstate C. Driving in reverse on a side street D. Driving on the shoulder of a highway 5. WHEN PASSING A BICYCLIST, YOU SHOULD: A. Blast your horn to alert the bicyclist B. Move as far left as possible C. Remain in the center of the lane D. Put on your four-way flashers 6. WHEN YOU DRIVE THROUGH AN AREA WHERE CHILDREN ARE PLAYING, YOU SHOULD EXPECT THEM: A. To know when it is safe to cross B. To stop at the curb before crossing the street C. To run out in front of you without looking D. Not to cross unless they are with an adult 7. IF YOU ARE DRIVING BEHIND A MOTORCYCLE, YOU MUST: A.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate 85 Widening and Improvements Spartanburg And
    Interstate 85 Widening and Improvements Mile Marker 80 – 96 Spartanburg and Cherokee Counties Environmental Assessment SCDOT NEPA ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS Date: 10/12/2015 FORM Project ID : 027114 County : Cherokee District : District 4 Doc Type: EA Total # of 12 Commitments: Project Name: I‐85 Widening (MM80‐96) The Environmental Commitment Contractor Responsible measures listed below are to be included in the contract and must be implemented. It is the responsibility of the Program Manager to make sure the Environmental Commitment SCDOT Responsible measures are adhered to. If there are questions regarding the commitments listed please contact: CONTACT NAME: Mr. Brad Reynolds PHONE #: (803)‐737‐1440 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS FOR THE PROJECT Water Quality Responsibility: CONTRACTOR The contractor will be required to minimize possible water quality impacts through implementation of construction BMPs, reflecting policies contained in 23 CFR 650B and the Department's Supplemental Specifications on Seeding and Erosion Control Measures (Latest Edition). Other measures including seeding, silt fences, sediment basins, etc. as appropriate will be implemented during construction to minimize impacts to Water Quality. Non‐Standard Commitment Responsibility: CONTRACTOR Floodplains The selected contractor will send a set of final plans and request for floodplain management compliance to the local County Floodplain Administrator. A hydraulic analysis will be performed for each encroachment of a FEMA‐regulated floodplain and a detailed hydraulic analysis
    [Show full text]
  • Sb180 Int.Pdf
    STATE OF OKLAHOMA 1st Session of the 48th Legislature (2001) SENATE BILL 180 By: Williamson AS INTRODUCED An Act relating to motor vehicles; amending 47 O.S. 1991, Section 11-303, which relates to overtaking vehicles on the left; modifying method for overtaking vehicles on the left; modifying maximum speed limit for certain vehicles; providing for codification; and providing an effective date. BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA: SECTION 1. AMENDATORY 47 O.S. 1991, Section 11-303, is amended to read as follows: Section 11-303. The following rules shall govern the overtaking and passing of vehicles proceeding in the same direction, subject to those limitations, exceptions and special rules hereinafter stated: 1. The driver of a vehicle overtaking another vehicle proceeding in the same direction shall pass to the left thereof at a safe distance and shall not again drive to the right side of the roadway until safely clear of the overtaken vehicle. 2. Except when overtaking and passing on the right is permitted, the driver of an overtaken vehicle shall give way to the right in favor of the overtaking vehicle on audible signal and shall not increase the speed of his or her vehicle until completely passed by the overtaking vehicle. 3. Every driver who intends to pass another vehicle proceeding in the same direction, which requires moving his or her vehicle from one lane of traffic to another, shall first see that such movement can be made with safety and shall proceed to pass only after giving a proper signal by hand or mechanical device; provided, however, if the driver moves to the left lane of traffic, the driver must Req.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Driving Record
    What Every Driver Must Know Chapter 2: Your Driving Record Did you know that . ? • In 1901, the Michigan Secretary of State was given the responsibility of maintaining records of motor vehicles and drivers operating in the state. • By 1913, Michigan had 60,438 registered motor vehicles, more than 20 times the number eight years earlier. Traffic crashes were on the rise too, although there was no requirement to report them. Your driving record Driving is a privilege. Once you obtain a driver’s rating, automobile recalls and driver verification for license, you must continually show that you have car rental companies. the skill and knowledge to drive safely or your driver’s license may be restricted, suspended or revoked. The Secretary of State has access to information Michigan’s point system from law enforcement and the courts, including Under Michigan law, some traffic violations are moving violations, crashes and certain drug crimes. civil infractions, while others are misdemeanors or Your driving record will include information about felonies. Depending on the violation and how it is civil or criminal moving violations and crashes. resolved, you may be fined, referred to a special program, or, in the most serious situations, sent to The Secretary of State is also notified of any traffic jail. In most cases, if you do not take care of a traffic crashes, convictions and findings of responsibility ticket, your driver’s license will be suspended. Any in other states. Convictions from other states will traffic tickets for moving violations received while appear on your Michigan driving record along with your license is suspended will result in additional any points assessed according to Michigan’s point suspensions on your driving record and payment of system.
    [Show full text]
  • TRB Special Report 267: Regulation of Weights, Lengths, And
    Regulation of Weights, Lengths, and Widths of Commercial Motor Vehicles SPECIAL REPORT 267 TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2002 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* Chairman: E. Dean Carlson, Secretary, Kansas Department of Transportation, Topeka Vice Chairman: Genevieve Giuliano, Professor, School of Policy, Planning, and Development, University of Southern California, Los Angeles Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board William D. Ankner, Director, Rhode Island Department of Transportation, Providence Thomas F. Barry, Jr., Secretary of Transportation, Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee Michael W. Behrens, Executive Director, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin Jack E. Buffington, Associate Director and Research Professor, Mack-Blackwell National Rural Transportation Study Center, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Sarah C. Campbell, President, TransManagement, Inc., Washington, D.C. Joanne F. Casey, President, Intermodal Association of North America, Greenbelt, Maryland James C. Codell III, Secretary, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, Frankfort John L. Craig, Director, Nebraska Department of Roads, Lincoln Robert A. Frosch, Senior Research Fellow, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts Susan Hanson, Landry University Professor of Geography, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts Lester A. Hoel, L.A. Lacy Distinguished Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University
    [Show full text]
  • Muncy Creek Township
    Muncy Creek Planning Area Plan Adoptions 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Plan Adoptions HUGHESVILLE BOROUGH COUNCIL – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> MUNCY BOROUGH COUNCIL – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> PICTURE ROCKS BOROUGH COUNCIL – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> SHREWSBURY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> WOLF TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> Lycoming 2030: Plan the Possible 2 Muncy Creek Planning Area Acknowledgements 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Acknowledgements Muncy Creek Planning Advisory Team (PAT) WALTER REED, REPRESENTATIVE OF HUGHESVILLE BOROUGH RICHARD SMITH, REPRESENTATIVE OF HUGHESVILLE BOROUGH STEVE JAQUITH, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY BOROUGH (ALTERNATE) BILL RAMSEY, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY BOROUGH LINDA STEIN, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY BOROUGH STEVEN CULVER, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP BILL POULTON, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP ANGELA SNYDER, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP BILL DORMAN, REPRESENTATIVE OF PICTURE ROCKS BOROUGH EUGENE OTTERBEIN, REPRESENTATIVE OF PICTURE ROCKS BOROUGH DEAN BARTO, REPRESENTATIVE OF WOLF TOWNSHIP MELANIE MCCOY, REPRESENTATIVE OF WOLF TOWNSHIP TERRY DINCHER, REPRESENTATIVE OF SHREWSBURY TOWNSHIP REBECCA FOUGHT, REPRESENTATIVE OF EAST LYCOMING RECREATION AUTHORITY DAVID MACIEJEWSKI, REPRESENTATIVE OF EAST LYCOMING SCHOOL DISTRICT MICHAEL PAWLIK, REPRESENTATIVE OF EAST LYCOMING SCHOOL DISTRICT GENE CAHN, REPRESENTATIVE
    [Show full text]
  • Pointing Out: How Walmart Unlawfully Punishes Workers for Medical Absences
    Pointing Out: How Walmart Unlawfully Punishes Workers for Medical Absences the work and family legal center June 2017 Pointing Out: How Walmart Unlawfully Punishes Workers for Medical Absences Table of Contents By Dina Bakst, Elizabeth Gedmark & Cara Suvall* Executive Summary ...........................................................................................1 Published by A Better Balance © June 2017 Introduction ..........................................................................................................3 Our Approach .......................................................................................................6 Attendance at Walmart ....................................................................................6 The Point System ........................................................................................7 the work and family legal center Excused Absences ......................................................................................8 The “Ostrich” Approach...........................................................................9 Who We Are Unrealistic Notice Requirement ..........................................................11 A Better Balance is a national legal advocacy organization dedicated to promoting fairness in the workplace. We help workers across the economic spectrum care for their families without risking their economic security. Through legislative Legal Protections ................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Administrative Code
    Texas Administrative Code TITLE 37 PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS PART 1 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY CHAPTER 15 DRIVER LICENSE RULES SUBCHAPTER D DRIVER IMPROVEMENT RULE §15.89 Moving Violations (a) Moving violations are defined as an act committed in connection with the operation of a motor vehicle on a public street or highway, which constitutes a hazard to traffic and is prohibited by state law or city ordinance. (b) A list of traffic offenses that constitute a moving violation is available in Table 1. Attached Graphic shown below (c) Table 1 also indicates the moving violations that will be assessed points under the Driver Responsibility Program, Texas Transportation Code (TRC), Chapter 708, Subchapter B. (1) Not all moving violations are assessed points under the Driver Responsibility Program, however, they may be considered for Habitual Violator action under TRC, §521.292(a)(3). (2) Moving violation convictions that are assessed specific surcharges pursuant to Texas Transportation Code, §§708.102 (intoxicated driver offenses), 708.103 (driving while license invalid or without financial responsibility), and 708.104 (driving without valid license including no commercial driver license, driving without the proper commercial license endorsement and driving without the proper motorcycle endorsement), will not be assessed points under the Driver Responsibility Program. Source Note: The provisions of this §15.89 adopted to be effective June 22, 2004, 29 TexReg 5945; amended to be effective November 28, 2005, 30 TexReg 7889; amended
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Project – I-35 Improvements
    I‐35 ROADWAY Proposed Project – I‐35 Improvements Existing Facility The majority of existing I‐35 between the Williamson/Bell County Line and Hillsboro is four lanes, with six‐lane sections in Waco, Temple, and the southern part of Bell County. Project Purpose The purpose of the proposed project is to increase capacity and improve mobility on I‐35. Project Proposed by Corridor Segment 2 Committee The I‐35 Corridor Segment 2 Committee is considering improvements to I‐35, which would involve widening I‐35 to eight lanes from Hillsboro to the Williamso n/Bell County Line for a distance of approximately 93 miles. Conceptual Project Cost Estimate According to the TxDOT Waco District Improvement Plan, the cost for expanding I‐35 to six lanes through this area is estimated at approximately $1.5 billion. The six‐lane expansion of I‐35 is currently underway. The estimated cost for expanding I‐35 from six to eight lanes is between $2.25 billion and $3.25 billion, including design and construction. This cost, in 2010 dollars, does not include the purchase of right of way. The estimated project costs could increase due to right of way purchases and potential impacts to properties. I‐35 Corridor Segment 2 Committee www.MY35.org September 2010 I‐35 ROADWAY Proposed Project – I‐35E from I‐20 to Hillsboro Existing Facility The existing I‐35E facility is four lanes from Hillsboro to approximately ten miles south of I‐20, where it transitions to six and then eight lanes. Project Purpose The purpose of the proposed project is to increase capacity and improve overall mobility on I‐35E.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater OKLAHOMA CITY at a Glance
    Greater OKLAHOMA CITY at a glance 123 Park Avenue | Oklahoma City, OK 73102 | 405.297.8900 | www.greateroklahomacity.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Location ................................................4 Economy .............................................14 Tax Rates .............................................24 Climate ..................................................7 Education ...........................................17 Utilities ................................................25 Population............................................8 Income ................................................21 Incentives ...........................................26 Transportation ..................................10 Labor Analysis ...................................22 Available Services ............................30 Housing ...............................................13 Commercial Real Estate .................23 Ranked No. 1 for Best Large Cities to Start a Business. -WalletHub 2 GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: One of the fastest-growing cities is integral to our success. Our in America and among the top ten low costs, diverse economy and places for fastest median wage business-friendly environment growth, job creation and to start a have kept the economic doldrums business. A top two small business at bay, and provided value, ranking. One of the most popular stability and profitability to our places for millennials and one of companies – and now we’re the top 10 cities for young adults. poised to do even more. The list of reasons you should Let us introduce
    [Show full text]