<<

Vol. 10, 581–588, June 2001 Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 581

Biomarkers of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon-DNA Damage and Cigarette Smoke Exposures in Paired Maternal and Newborn Blood Samples as a Measure of Differential Susceptibility1

؎ Robin M. Whyatt,2 Wieslaw Jedrychowski, aromatic-DNA adduct levels (16.6 ؎ 12.5 versus 14.21 and plasma cotinine (0.002 ؍ Kari Hemminki, Regina M. Santella, Wei-Yann Tsai, 15.4/108 nucleotides; P Ke Yang, and Frederica P. Perera (14.2 ؎ 35.5 versus 8.3 ؎ 24.5 ng/ml; P < 0.001) but not ؎ ؎ Divisions of Environmental Health Sciences [R. M. W., R. M. S., F. P. P.] and for PAH-DNA adduct levels (7.9 9.9 versus 5.9 8.2/ When analyses were restricted .(0.13 ؍ Biostatistics [W-Y. T.], Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia 108 nucleotides; P University, New York, New York 10032; College of Medicine, Jagiellonian to the 80 mother/newborn pairs from whom the blood University, Krakow, Poland 31014 [W. J.]; and Department of Biosciences at sample was drawn concurrently (within1hofeach Novum, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden S14157 [K. H., K. Y.] other), levels of all of the three biomarkers were significantly higher in the newborn compared with paired Abstract maternal blood samples (P < 0.05). Results suggest reduced detoxification capabilities and increased Human and experimental evidence indicates that the susceptibility of the fetus to DNA damage, especially in developing fetus may be more susceptible than the adult light of experimental evidence that transplacental to the effects of certain carcinogens, including some exposures to PAHs are 10-fold lower than paired polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Factors that maternal exposures. The results have implications for can modulate susceptibility include proliferation rates, risk assessment, which currently does not adequately detoxification capabilities, and DNA repair capacity. account for sensitive subsets of the population. Biomarkers can facilitate quantification of age-related susceptibility among human populations. In this study, we report on three biomarkers measured in paired blood Introduction samples collected at birth from 160 Polish mothers and Experimental and human evidence indicates that the developing newborns: 70 pairs from Krakow (a city with high air fetus and neonate can differ in susceptibility to chemical car- including PAHs) and 90 pairs from Limanowa cinogenesis compared with the adult (reviewed in Refs. 1, 2). (an area with lower ambient pollution but greater indoor Age-related factors that may modulate susceptibility include coal use). Biomarkers were: WBC aromatic-DNA adducts differing rates of cell proliferation, abilities to activate and by 32P-postlabeling and PAH-DNA adducts by ELISA (as detoxify carcinogens, DNA repair capacity, and the number of indicators of DNA damage from PAHs and other target cells at risk (1, 2). Bioassays have shown the young to be aromatics) and plasma cotinine (as an internal dosimeter both more susceptible and more resistant, depending on the of cigarette smoke). Correlations were assessed by carcinogen tested, the species evaluated, the age at first expo- Spearman’s rank test, and differences in biomarker levels sure, and the target organ (1–5). A number of the PAHs3 are were assessed by the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test. A transplacental carcinogens in experimental bioassays, produc- significant correlation between paired newborn/maternal ing tumors in the liver, lung, lymphatic tissues, and nervous system of the offspring (4–6). Cancer incidence at these sites ؍ samples was seen for aromatic-DNA adduct levels (r P < 0.001) has been shown to be greater if the PAH exposure begins ;0.8 ؍ P < 0.001) and plasma cotinine (r ;0.3 prenatally or early postnatally compared with later in life, at .(0.13 ؍ P ;0.14 ؍ but not PAH-DNA adduct levels (r Among the total cohort, levels of the three biomarkers comparable doses (4, 7–10). However, human data on age- were higher in newborn samples compared with paired related susceptibility to PAH tumorigenesis are not available maternal samples. The difference was significant for (1). Biomarkers can facilitate evaluation of factors modulating susceptibility to carcinogens among human populations (11– 13). As an indication of DNA damage, carcinogen-DNA ad- ducts represent a critical step on the carcinogenic pathway and Received 10/27/00; revised 3/8/01; accepted 3/14/01. are an informative biomarker of age-related susceptibility (11). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of Therefore, we have compared levels of two biomarkers of DNA page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in damage from PAHs and other aromatics in paired maternal and accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. 32 1 Supported by Grant P50 ES09600, Grant RO1 ES08977, and Grant RO1 newborn blood samples: WBC aromatic-DNA adducts by P- ES06722 from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Grant postlabeling and PAH-DNA adducts by ELISA. Plasma cotin- R827027 from the United States Environmental Protection Agency; Grant DE- ine levels were also compared as an internal dosimeter of FG02-93ER61719 from the Department of Energy; and grants from the Gladys cigarette smoke exposure. and Roland Harriman Foundation, the March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, the W. Alton Jones Foundation, and the New York Community Trust. 2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Division of Environ- mental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 60 Haven Avenue, B-1, New York, New York 10032. Phone: (212) 304-7273; 3 The abbreviations used are: PAH, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; NNK, Fax: (212) 544-1943; E-mail: [email protected]. 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone.

Downloaded from cebp.aacrjournals.org on July 17, 2018. © 2001 American Association for Cancer Research. 582 Biomarkers in Paired Maternal/Newborn Samples

The biological basis for measuring DNA adducts derives Materials and Methods from extensive experimental data supporting their role in the Field studies were conducted in Poland during January–March, initiation and possibly in the progression of cancer (14). An 1992 under the direction of Dr. Wieslaw Jedrychowski (Jagiel- association between PAH-DNA adduct levels and cancer risk lonian University, Krakow, Poland) in accordance with current has been seen previously (14–17) in both epidemiological and guidelines for human subjects. Enrollment was restricted to experimental research. PAHs such as benzo(a)pyrene readily women who had resided in Krakow or Limanowa for at least 1 cross the placenta. Experimental studies (18–20) using radio- year and was limited to vaginal deliveries. In all of the cases, labeled PAHs indicate that the dose to the fetus is generally an samples of umbilical cord blood (20–60 ml) were collected at order of magnitude or more lower than the dose to paired delivery, and a maternal blood sample was collected within an maternal tissues. Adducts formed between DNA and various average of 8.7 Ϯ 11.6 h after delivery (range, 5 h before PAHs have been measured in multiple fetal tissues in experi- delivery to 66 h after delivery). For a subset of 80 of these mental rodent bioassays (21–23). Fetal levels are generally mother/newborn pairs, the maternal blood sample was drawn lower than maternal levels but higher than expected given the within1hofdelivery (either before or after delivery). Samples maternal/fetal dose differential. Levels of genotoxic damage were processed as described previously (44). (micronuclei formation and DNA single strand breaks) after A detailed, validated questionnaire administered to the transplacental PAH exposure have been shown experimentally mother within 2 days postpartum included information on to be higher in fetal than paired maternal tissues (23–25). One smoking (active and passive), residential and employment his- prior molecular epidemiological study has measured PAH- tories, use of coal stoves for residential heating, and other DNA adducts in maternal and cord blood samples (26). When environmental exposures as described previously (44). measured by ELISA with fluorescence detection, PAH-DNA Aromatic-DNA Adducts. The 32P-postlabeling TLC assay adducts were detected in 18 of 27 and 13 of 21 of the maternal was carried out at the Karolinska Institute as described previ- and newborn WBCs, respectively. For mothers and newborns ously (50, 51). In brief, DNA was extracted from the crude with detectable adducts, mean levels were similar (26). nuclei using organic solvents after degrading RNAs and pro- ␮ Cotinine is the major proximal metabolite of nicotine but teins; 5 g of DNA was digested by micrococcal nuclease and Ј has a longer half-life in sera (15–40 h versus 1–3 h for nico- spleen phosphodiesterase to 3 nucleotides. Adducts were then tine), and serum concentrations of cotinine are 10-fold higher enriched by nuclease P1 treatment. A postlabeling reaction was than they are for nicotine (27–31). It is less biologically active carried out and applied on a TLC plate for adduct separation in than nicotine (30, 31) but has been widely used as a marker of three dimensions. After autoradiography, the adduct spots were exposure to tobacco smoke (29, 32, 33), which contains a excised from the successfully developed TLC plate for counting of radioactivity as uniform areas covering most of the radioac- myriad of carcinogens, including the nicotine-derived carcino- tive fractions of the plate (51). Two to five assays were carried gens, 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) out for each sample, and the mean of all of the assay results and NЈ-nitrosonornicotine (34, 35), as well as carcinogenic were calculated. The detection limit of the assay was 0.07 PAHs (27). Nicotine readily crosses the placenta, and both adducts/108 nucleotides. The assay detects multiple PAHs and nicotine and cotinine have been measured in fetal tissues (30, other aromatic compounds bound to DNA (52). Aromatic-DNA 36–38). Studies (39–43) comparing paired maternal/fetal co- adduct levels were determined for 122 mother/newborn pairs. tinine levels are few and have yielded conflicting results. Both higher and lower concentrations in maternal samples compared PAH-DNA Adducts. PAH-DNA adducts were measured by a competitive ELISA with fluorescence end-point detection es- with fetal samples have been reported. sentially as described previously (53). The detection limit of the This study extends prior evaluations in the current cohort assay is two adducts/108 nucleotides. Samples were assayed in of 70 mother/newborn pairs from Krakow, Poland (an industrial triplicate at 50 ␮g of DNA/well. The median values were used city with elevated ambient air pollution including PAHs from to determine the percentage of inhibition. When sufficient DNA coal-burning for industry and residential heating) and 90 pairs was available (63% of samples), the assay was repeated. Lab- from Limanowa (a small town located 70 km southeast of oratory personnel were blinded to subject status. The antiserum Krakow with lower ambient pollution levels but 2-fold more was elicited against benzo(a)pyrene-diol-epoxide-DNA but frequent use of coal-stoves for indoor home heating (44). We recognizes other structurally related PAH diol-epoxide-DNA have reported previously (45, 46) that a significant association adducts, including those formed by benz[a]anthracene and Ͻ ␮ was seen between ambient particulate levels of 10 m (PM10) chrysene (54). Thus, positive reaction with the antiserum may and PAH-DNA but not aromatic-DNA adduct levels in both indicate the presence of multiple PAH-DNA adducts in the maternal and newborn WBCs. Maternal active and passive sample. Values are expressed as the amount of BPDE-DNA cigarette smoking status was significantly associated with ma- that would cause a similar inhibition in the assay. PAH-DNA ternal PAH-DNA but not aromatic-DNA adduct levels (45, 46). adduct levels were determined for 112 mother/newborn pairs. However, adduct levels in maternal WBCs did not differ sig- Plasma Cotinine. The method involved liquid/liquid extrac- nificantly between ex-smokers and nonsmokers (45, 46). Nor tion of plasma, followed by gas chromatographic separation was any association seen between maternal smoking status and using a 30-m 0.25 ␮ DB megabore column and a nitro- either measure of DNA adducts in newborn WBCs, possibly gen phosphorus detector operated in the mode as because the activity of placental enzymes that are induced by described previously (44). An internal standard, N-methyl co- maternal smoking reduced the biologically effective dose to the tinine, was added to the plasma before extraction. Five-point fetus (47, 48). Newborn PAH-DNA adduct levels were signif- standard curves were generated for each analytical run, and icantly inversely associated with birth weight, length, and head low- and high-quality control samples were processed each day. circumference (49). Newborn plasma cotinine was inversely The method requires cold trapping injection followed by tem- associated with birth weight and length (49). The present report perature programming to achieve optimal separation resulting extends the research to compare levels of three biomarkers in in an analysis time of 18 min/sample. To facilitate productivity, mother/newborn pairs. an autosampler and online automatic data reduction were used

Downloaded from cebp.aacrjournals.org on July 17, 2018. © 2001 American Association for Cancer Research. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 583

Table 1 Number of mother/newborn pairs,a maternal age,b and smoking smoking status, newborn adduct levels again exceeded maternal statusa of mothers levels among both nonsmokers and ex-smokers, but the differ- ence was significant only among the nonsmokers (P ϭ 0.005) Mother/newborn pairs 160 and was not significant among the ex-smokers (P ϭ 0.2). By Mother’s age (yr) 26.3 Ϯ 4.8 Current smokers 16 (10%) contrast, aromatic-DNA adduct levels among newborns of cur- Ex-smokers 38 (24%) rent smokers were similar and not significantly different from Nonsmokers 106 (66%) paired maternal levels (P ϭ 0.79; Table 2). a When analyses were restricted to mother/newborn pairs Number of subjects (%). ϭ b Mean Ϯ SD. from whom blood was drawn concurrently (n 61), newborn aromatic-DNA adduct levels consistently exceeded maternal adduct levels, but the difference was significant only when analyses involved all of the mother/newborn pairs with con- so that samples could be processed during the evening or current blood sampling (P ϭ 0.04) and was not significant overnight, as needed. Cotinine levels were determined on 158 when analyses were stratified by smoking status (P Ն 0.1). 8 mother/newborn pairs, including 80 pairs from whom blood Table 3 compares PAH-DNA adduct levels (/10 nucleo- samples were drawn within1hofeach other (concurrent tides) in mother/newborn pairs. When analyses involved all of samples). the mother/newborn pairs (n ϭ 112), PAH-DNA adduct levels Statistical Analyses. Means and SDs for biomarker levels in were somewhat higher in newborn compared with paired ma- paired maternal and newborn samples are presented. Statistical ternal WBCs among the total cohort and among newborns of nonsmokers and ex-smokers (Table 3). The difference was of analyses were undertaken using nonparametric statistics be- ϭ cause of the distributional properties of the biomarkers and the borderline significance among the nonsmokers (P 0.05; large number of samples that were below the limit of detection. Table 3). Among the 10 current smokers, maternal adduct Correlations between biomarkers in paired maternal and new- levels exceeded the newborn levels in 7 of the 10 pairs, al- though they were less than the newborn levels in 1 of the 10 born samples were assessed by Spearman’s rank. The differ- ϭ ences in biomarker levels in mother/newborn pairs were as- pairs (P 0.05; Table 3). When analyses were restricted to the mother/newborn pairs from whom the blood samples were sessed by the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test. Analyses were first ϭ undertaken involving all of the mother/newborn pairs (total drawn concurrently (n 60), PAH-DNA adducts were higher sample) and then were restricted to the 80 mother/newborn in the newborn compared with paired maternal WBCs in all of pairs from whom blood samples were drawn within1hofeach the groups except current smokers. The difference was signif- icant for the total cohort (P ϭ 0.04) and among nonsmokers other (concurrent samples). Associations were considered sig- ϭ nificant at P Յ 0.05. (P 0.03). Table 4 compares plasma cotinine levels (ng/ml) in ma- ternal and newborn blood samples for all of the mother/ Results newborn pairs and for the mother/newborn pairs from whom Data on demographic variables and smoking status are sum- blood was drawn concurrently. Newborn cotinine levels con- marized in Table 1. Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 show the correlation sistently exceeded maternal levels, and in most cases the dif- between biomarkers in paired maternal and newborn blood ference was highly significant. Specifically, as seen in Table 4, samples for all of the mother/newborn pairs. The correlation among the total cohort (n ϭ 158), newborn levels exceeded between WBC PAH-DNA adduct levels in paired maternal/ those in the paired maternal sample five times as frequently as newborn samples was not significant (Fig. 1A; r ϭ 0.14; P ϭ maternal levels exceeded the paired newborn levels (see ranks, 0.13). WBC aromatic-DNA adduct levels were moderately but Table 4; P Ͻ 0.001). Similarly, among the concurrent samples significantly correlated (Fig. 1B; r ϭ 0.3; P Ͻ 0.001). Plasma (n ϭ 80; Table 4), newborn cotinine levels again exceeded the cotinine levels were highly correlated (Fig. 2A; r ϭ 0.8; P Ͻ paired maternal levels five times as frequently as the maternal 0.001). When analyses were restricted to the mother/newborn levels exceeded the paired newborn levels, a difference that pairs from whom the blood samples were drawn concurrently, remained highly significant despite the reduced sample size the correlations between the biomarkers in paired samples (P Ͻ 0.001). remained essentially unchanged. Specifically, WBC PAH- After stratifying by smoking status, newborn cotinine lev- DNA adduct levels in paired samples were not correlated (r ϭ els exceeded paired maternal levels in all of the strata (non- 0.08; P ϭ 0.53; n ϭ 60). WBC aromatic-DNA adduct levels in smokers, ex-smokers, and current smokers). This difference paired samples were moderately correlated (r ϭ 0.3; P ϭ 0.01; was significant (P Յ 0.005) in all of the strata when analyses n ϭ 61). Plasma cotinine levels in paired samples were highly involved the total cohort (Table 4). When analyses were re- correlated (r ϭ 0.8; P Ͻ 0.001; n ϭ 80; data not shown). stricted to the concurrent samples (Table 4), newborn cotinine Tables 2–4 compare the biomarker levels in mother/ levels exceeded paired maternal levels in all of the strata newborn pairs and provide results of the Wilcoxon signed-ranks (nonsmokers, ex-smokers, and current smokers), and the mag- test. Analyses are provided both for the total cohort and for the nitude of the difference was similar to that seen in the total mother/newborn pairs from whom the blood samples were cohort. However, the difference was significant only among drawn concurrently. nonsmokers (P ϭ 0.008; Table 4) and was not significant As seen from Table 2, aromatic-DNA adduct levels (/108 among ex-smokers and current smokers, because of the reduced nucleotides) were higher in newborn than in paired maternal sample size (n ϭ 16 and n ϭ 4 pairs, respectively). WBCs. Specifically, when analyses involved all of the mother/ Table 5 shows the number of mother/newborn pairs with newborn pairs (n ϭ 122), newborn aromatic-DNA adduct lev- biomarker levels above and below the limit of detection. The els exceeded paired maternal levels approximately twice as ratio (mean Ϯ SD, range) of newborn/maternal biomarker lev- frequently because they were less than paired maternal levels els for the mother and newborn pairs in which the biomarker in (see ranks for mother/newborn pairs; Table 2), a difference that both the maternal and newborn blood samples was above the was statistically significant (P ϭ 0.002). After stratifying by limit of detection is also presented. As seen, the levels of

Downloaded from cebp.aacrjournals.org on July 17, 2018. © 2001 American Association for Cancer Research. 584 Biomarkers in Paired Maternal/Newborn Samples

Fig. 1. Correlation between DNA adduct levels/108 nucleotides in paired maternal and newborn WBCs. A, correlation between ma- ternal and newborn WBC PAH- DNA adducts; r ϭ 0.14; P ϭ 0.13. B, correlation between maternal and newborn WBC aromatic-DNA ad- duct levels; r ϭ 0.3; P Ͻ 0.001.

aromatic DNA-adducts were above the limit of detection in the limit of detection, there was a fairly equal distribution both maternal and newborn WBCs for 113 of 122 (93%) of the among the pairs in which the adduct levels in both the maternal mother/newborn pairs. Among these pairs, newborn aromatic- and newborn WBCs were below the limit of detection (n ϭ 24) DNA adduct levels averaged 4.1 Ϯ 12.5 (range, 0.04–105.3) compared with the pairs in which: (a) the adduct levels were times higher than paired maternal adduct levels. above the limit of detection in the newborn WBCs and below By contrast, the levels of PAH-DNA adducts were above the limit of detection in the maternal WBCs (n ϭ 20); and (b) the limit of detection in both the maternal and newborn WBCs the adducts were below the limit of detection in the newborn in only 44 of 112 (39%) of the mother/newborn pairs (Table 5). WBCs and were above the limit of detection in the maternal Among these mother/newborn pairs with adducts above the WBCs (n ϭ 24). limit of detection, newborn PAH-DNA adduct levels averaged Levels of plasma cotinine were above the limit of detec- 2.7 Ϯ 3.2 (range, 0.11–15.5) times higher than paired maternal tion in both the maternal and newborn blood samples in 58 of adduct levels. Among the 68 of 122 (61%) of the mother/ 158 (38%) of the mother/newborn pairs (Table 5). Among these newborn pairs in which the PAH-DNA adduct levels in either pairs, newborn plasma cotinine averaged 2.0 Ϯ 1.8 (range, or both of the maternal and/or the newborn WBCs were below 0.67–9.7) times higher than paired maternal cotinine levels. For

Downloaded from cebp.aacrjournals.org on July 17, 2018. © 2001 American Association for Cancer Research. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 585

Fig. 2. Correlation between plasma cotinine levels (ng/ml) in paired ma- ternal and newborn blood samples. A, correlation between plasma coti- nine levels in mother/newborn pairs; r ϭ 0.8; P Ͻ 0.001.

Table 2 WBC aromatic-DNA adduct levels by 32P-postlabeling paired maternal and newborn blood samples

Ranks for mother/newborn pairsa Mean Ϯ SD/108 nucleotides Negative ranksb Positive ranksc Tiesd Pa Maternal Newborn No.e Sumf No.e Sumf No.e A. WBC aromatic-DNA adduct levels in all of the mother/newborn pairs (total sample) Total cohort (n ϭ 122) 14.2 Ϯ 15.4 16.6 Ϯ 12.5 41 2430 79 4830 2 P ϭ 0.002 Nonsmoker (n ϭ 79) 15.0 Ϯ 16.3 17.1 Ϯ 11.3 25 976 53 2104 1 P ϭ 0.005 Ex-smoker (n ϭ 32) 13.0 Ϯ 15.6 15.7 Ϯ 14.9 11 185 20 311 1 P ϭ 0.22 Current smoker (n ϭ 11) 12.0 Ϯ 4.2 14.7 Ϯ 13.7 5 30 6 36 0 P ϭ 0.79 B. WBC aromatic-DNA adduct levels in mother/newborn pairs with blood drawn concurrently (concurrent samples) Total cohort (n ϭ 61) 15.2 Ϯ 17.8 17.8 Ϯ 14.4 22 655 39 1237 0 P ϭ 0.04 Nonsmoker (n ϭ 46) 16.6 Ϯ 20.1 17.8 Ϯ 12.4 18 390 28 692 0 P ϭ 0.10 Ex-smoker (n ϭ 12) 10.6 Ϯ 6.9 16.5 Ϯ 20.4 4 29 8 49 0 P ϭ 0.43 Current smoker (n ϭ 3) 10.9 Ϯ 2.2 23.5 Ϯ 20.1 0 0 3 6 0 P ϭ 0.11 a Wilcoxon signed-ranks test. b Newborn adduct level Ͻ maternal adduct levels. c Newborn adduct levels Ͼ maternal adduct levels. d Newborn adduct levels ϭ maternal adduct levels. of mother/newborn pairs. f Sum of ranks.

73 of 158 (46%) of the pairs, cotinine in both maternal and ing fetus to DNA damage from this class of carcinogens. newborn plasma was below the limit of detection. Among the Experimental evidence in rodents indicates that transplacen- 27 pairs in which cotinine in either the maternal or the newborn tal exposures to PAHs are generally an order of magnitude or plasma was below the limit of detection, there was a higher more lower than paired maternal exposures (18). In light of proportion of pairs in which the cotinine level was above the these experimental results, our findings suggest that the limit of detection in the newborn and below the limit of detec- amount of DNA damage/delivered dose of PAHs may be tion in the mother (22 of 27) than pairs in which the cotinine considerably higher in the fetus relative to his/her mother. was below the limit of detection in the newborn and was above This increased susceptibility could result from reduced de- the limit of detection in the mother (5 of 27). toxification capabilities or decreased DNA repair capacity during fetal development (reviewed in Refs. 1, 55). Discussion The ratio of DNA damage in newborn WBCs compared This study found that the levels of DNA damage from PAHs with maternal WBCs differed by maternal smoking status. and other aromatics were higher in newborn WBCs than in Specifically, among newborns of nonsmoking women, both paired maternal WBCs. The difference in mean adduct levels aromatic-DNA adducts and PAH-DNA adducts were higher in between newborn and maternal WBCs was small and not newborn WBCs compared with paired maternal WBCs, a dif- always statistically significant; nonetheless, the results point ference that was highly significant for aromatic-DNA adducts to the possibility of increased susceptibility of the develop- (P ϭ 0.005) and of borderline significance for PAH-DNA

Downloaded from cebp.aacrjournals.org on July 17, 2018. © 2001 American Association for Cancer Research. 586 Biomarkers in Paired Maternal/Newborn Samples

Table 3 WBC PAH-DNA adduct levels by ELISA in paired maternal and newborn blood samples

Ranks for mother/newborn pairsa Mean Ϯ SD/108 nucleotides Negative ranksb Positive ranksc Tiesd Pa Maternal Newborn No.e Sumf No.e Sumf No.e A. WBC PAH-DNA adduct levels in all of the mother/newborn pairs (total sample) Total cohort (n ϭ 112) 5.9 Ϯ 8.2 7.9 Ϯ 9.9 43 1557 44 2271 25 P ϭ 0.13 Nonsmoker (n ϭ 70) 5.1 Ϯ 6.3 8.1 Ϯ 9.4 25 498 28 933 17 P ϭ 0.05 Ex-smoker (n ϭ 32) 5.4 Ϯ 6.7 8.4 Ϯ 1.3 11 130 15 221 6 P ϭ 0.25 Current smoker (n ϭ 10) 12.9 Ϯ 17.5 4.6 Ϯ 8.4 7 32 1 4 2 P ϭ 0.05 B. WBC PAH-DNA adduct levels in mother/newborn pairs with blood drawn concurrently (concurrent samples) Total cohort (n ϭ 60) 5.7 Ϯ 7.4 9.4 Ϯ 11.0 21 382 27 794 12 P ϭ 0.04 Nonsmoker (n ϭ 45) 4.9 Ϯ 6.8 9.1 Ϯ 10.2 15 191 21 475 9 P ϭ 0.03 Ex-smoker (n ϭ 12) 9.4 Ϯ 9.5 12.7 Ϯ 14.0 5 24 6 42 1 P ϭ 0.42 Current smoker (n ϭ 3) 3.7 Ϯ 4.6 1.0 Ϯ 0.011002P ϭ 0.32 a Wilcoxon signed-ranks test. b Newborn adduct level Ͻ maternal adduct levels. c Newborn adduct levels Ͼ maternal adduct levels. d Newborn adduct levels ϭ maternal adduct levels. e Number of mother/newborn pairs. f Sum of ranks.

Table 4 Plasma cotinine levels in paired maternal and newborn blood samples

Ranks for mother/newborn pairsa Mean Ϯ SD ng/ml Negative ranksb Positive ranksc Tiesd Pa Maternal Newborn No.e Sumf No.e Sumf No.e A. Plasma cotinine levels in all of the mother/newborn pairs (total sample) Total cohort (n ϭ 158) 8.3 Ϯ 24.5 14.2 Ϯ 35.5 13 344 64 2659 81 P Ͻ 0.001 Nonsmoker (n ϭ 104) 3.2 Ϯ 16.5 4.0 Ϯ 18.3 11 201 33 790 60 P ϭ 0.001 Ex-smoker (n ϭ 38) 11.4 Ϯ 28.2 17.7 Ϯ 38.3 2 21 16 150 20 P ϭ 0.005 Current smoker (n ϭ 16) 34.7 Ϯ 38.6 72.2 Ϯ 53.8 0 0 15 120 1 P ϭ 0.001 B. Plasma cotinine levels in mother/newborn pairs with blood drawn concurrently (concurrent samples) Total cohort (n ϭ 80) 7.2 Ϯ 25.9 7.7 Ϯ 27.3 8 159 33 703 39 P Ͻ 0.001 Nonsmoker (n ϭ 60) 3.3 Ϯ 19.4 3.4 Ϯ 18.9 7 104 23 362 30 P ϭ 0.008 Ex-smoker (n ϭ 16) 9.4 Ϯ 22.9 10.1 Ϯ 23.9 1 7 7 29 8 P ϭ 0.12 Current smoker (n ϭ 4) 57.0 Ϯ 62.8 63.7 Ϯ 71.4 0 0 3 6 1 P ϭ 0.11 a Wilcoxon signed-ranks test. b Newborn cotinine levels Ͻ maternal cotinine levels. c Newborn cotinine levels Ͼ maternal cotinine levels. d Newborn cotinine levels ϭ maternal cotinine levels. e Number of mother/newborn pairs. f Sum of ranks.

Table 5 Number of maternal/newborn pairs with biomarker levels above and below the limit of detection and ratio of newborn/maternal biomarker levels among pairs with detectable levels

Pairs with maternal and/or newborn levels below limit Pairs with maternal and newborn levels above of detection the limit of detection Both below Newborn above/ Newborn below/ Both above Ratio newborn/maternal detection maternal below maternal above detection levels: mean Ϯ SD (range) Aromatic-DNA adduct levels N ϭ 2 N ϭ 2 N ϭ 5 N ϭ 113 4.1 Ϯ 12.5 (0.04–105.3) PAH-DNA adduct levels N ϭ 24 N ϭ 20 N ϭ 24 N ϭ 44 2.7 Ϯ 3.2 (0.11–15.5) Plasma cotinine N ϭ 73 N ϭ 22 N ϭ 5 N ϭ 58 2.0 Ϯ 1.8 (0.67–9.7)

adducts (P ϭ 0.05). By contrast, among newborns of current have shown placental CYP1A1 to be highly induced by mater- smoking women, aromatic-DNA adducts were not significantly nal cigarette smoking. Prior evidence suggests that induction of different from paired maternal levels (P ϭ 0.8) and PAH-DNA CYP1A1 in placentas of smokers may reduce the biologically adducts were lower (P ϭ 0.05). It is possible that enzyme effective dose to the fetus (47, 48). As reported previously (45, activity of cytochrome P4501A1 (CYP1A1) in placental tissue 60), we also found that placental CYP1A1 was inversely, contributed to these differences. We and others (44, 56–59) although not significantly, correlated with PAH-DNA adduct

Downloaded from cebp.aacrjournals.org on July 17, 2018. © 2001 American Association for Cancer Research. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 587

levels in WBCs and placental tissue from newborns in the The findings have implications for risk assessment, which cur- current cohort. rently does not adequately account for sensitive subsets of the This study also found that cotinine levels were consis- population. tently and, in most cases, significantly higher in newborn plasma compared with paired maternal plasma. Few prior stud- ies (39–43) have compared cotinine levels in mother/newborn Acknowledgments pairs, and results have been conflicting, with both higher and We thank T. Randall, Dr. A. Rundle, Dr. T. L. Young, T. Cooper, Q. Wang, D. Allen, F. Crofts, and R. Lonow for their assistance. lower concentration in the neonate reported. It is likely that methodological differences in the timing of the maternal blood collection relative to newborn blood collection have contrib- References uted to these differences, because most prior studies have not 1. Anderson, L. M., Diwan, B. A., Fear, N. T., and Roman, E. Critical windows collected the maternal and newborn blood samples concur- of exposure for children’s health: cancer in human epidemiological studies and rently. Given the short half-life of cotinine in plasma, concur- neoplasms in experimental animal models. Environ. Health Perspect., 108: 573– 594, 2000. rent sampling is needed to differentiate the possibilities that 2. National Academy of Sciences. in the Diets of Infants and Children. newborn/maternal cotinine ratios reflect a true biological dif- Carcinogenesis and Mutagenesis, pp. 70–76. Washington, DC: National Acad- ference in dose and/or metabolic processing of cotinine or a emy Press, 1993. difference in elapsed time between cigarette smoke exposure 3. Vesselinovitch, S. C., Kandala, D. R., and Mihailovich, N. Neoplastic response and newborn versus maternal blood collection. Our results of mouse tissues during perinatal age periods and its significance in chemical suggest that there is a biological difference and that cotinine carcinogenesis. NCI Monogr., 51: 230–250, 1975. concentrates in the fetus. Consistent with our findings, a recent 4. Vesselinovitch, S. C., Kyriazis, A. P., Mihailovich, N., and Rao, K. V. study by Nafstad et al. (41) also found cotinine levels in cord Conditions modifying development of tumors in mice at various sites by benzo- (a)pyrene. Cancer Res., 35: 2948–2953, 1975. sera to be significantly higher than paired maternal sera levels. 5. Drew, R. T., Boorman, G. A., Haseman, J. K., McConnell, E. E., Busey, In that study, the maternal blood sample was collected within W. M., and Moore, J. A. The effect of age and exposure duration on cancer 2 h of the cord blood samples in 26 of 28 mother/newborn pairs. induction by a known carcinogen in rats, mice, and hamsters. Toxicol. Appl. Cotinine has low toxicity relative to nicotine (30, 31), but Pharmacol., 68: 120–130, 1983. it is a good internal dosimeter for nicotine, although interindi- 6. Bulay, O. M., and Wattemberg, L. W. Carcinogenic effects of polycyclic vidual differences in the of nicotine to cotinine hydrocarbon carcinogens administrated to mice during pregnancy on the progeny. have been documented (29). Both experimental and epidemio- J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 46: 397–402, 1971. 7. Rice, J. M., and Ward, J. M. Age dependence of susceptibility to carcinogen- logical evidence indicates that nicotine also concentrates in the esis in the nervous system. Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 381: 274–289, 1982. fetus (30, 39). This appears attributable, at least in part, to 8. Toth, B., Rappaport, H., and Shubik, P. Influence of dose and age on the reduced clearance mechanisms during fetal development. Spe- induction of malignant lymphomas and other tumors by 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]an- cifically, experimental studies (30) indicate that although nic- thracene in Swiss mice. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 30: 723–741, 1963. otine rapidly reaches the fetus in concentrations approximately 9. Walters, M. A. The induction of lung tumours by the injection of 9,10- equal to those of the mother, the rate of disappearance is slower. dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene (DMBA) into newborn suckling and young adult Some studies in humans (reviewed in Ref. 61) have shown that mice. A dose response study. Br. J. Cancer, 20: 148–160, 1966. the half-life of cotinine in bodily fluids is also longer in the 10. Soyka, L. F. Hepatic drug metabolizing enzyme activity and tumorigenesis in mice following perinatal exposure to benzo(a)pyrene. Pediatr. Pharmacol., 1: neonate than in the adult, whereas others (62) have shown that 85–96, 1980. the half-life of cotinine in blood and urine is similar in the 11. Perera, F. Environment and cancer: who are susceptible? Science (Wash. newborn and in the adult but that the half-life of nicotine is DC), 278: 1068–1073, 1997. three to four times longer. In addition, the fetus is likely to be 12. Whyatt, R. M., and Perera, F. P. Application of biologic markers to studies exposed to nicotine from gastrointestinal reabsorption of nico- of environmental risks in children and the developing fetus. Environ. Health tine in swallowed amniotic fluid, as well as through transfer Perspect., 103: 105–110, 1995. from the maternal circulation (43). Nicotine levels in amniotic 13. Bearer, C. F. Biomarkers in pediatric environmental health: a cross-cutting fluid have been shown to be 54% higher than the corresponding issue. Environ. Health Perspect., 106: 813–816, 1998. maternal serum levels (39). This additional source of fetal 14. Perera, F. P. Molecular epidemiology: on the path to prevention? J. Natl. nicotine exposure relative to maternal nicotine exposure may Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 92: 602–612, 2000. also contribute to the higher cotinine concentration seen here in 15. Tang, D., Santella, R., Blackwood, A., Young, T., Mayer, J., Jaretzki, A., Grantham, S., Tsai, W. Y., and Perera, F. P. A molecular epidemiological newborn plasma relative to maternal plasma. case-control study of lung cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 4: 341–346, These findings highlight the need for smoking prevention 1995. programs aimed at women of childbearing age. The adverse 16. Stowers, S. J., and Anderson, M. W. Formation and persistence of benzo- effects of nicotine on fetal growth are well documented (30). In [a]pyrene metabolite-DNA adducts. Environ. Health Perspect., 62: 31–39, 1985. addition, the nicotine-derived nitrosamine NNK is a potent 17. Poirier, M. C., and Beland, F. A. DNA adduct measurements and tumor transplacental carcinogen in experimental bioassays (63). Prior incidence during chronic carcinogen exposure in animal models: implications for DNA adduct-based human cancer risk assessment. Chem. Res. Toxicol., 5: epidemiological research (63) has shown higher levels of NNK 749–755, 1992. metabolites in urine collected immediately after delivery from 18. Neubert, D., and Tapken, S. Transfer of benzo(a)pyrene into mouse embryos newborns of smokers compared with NNK metabolite levels in and fetuses. Arch. Toxicol., 62: 236–239, 1988. urine from newborns of nonsmokers. 19. Withey, J. R., Shedden, J., Law, F. C., and Abedini, S. Distribution of Our findings also suggest increased susceptibility of the benzo[a]pyrene in pregnant rats following inhalation exposure and a comparison fetus to DNA damage from PAHs and other aromatics, con- with similar data obtained with pyrene. J. Appl. Toxicol., 13: 193–202, 1993. sistent with prior experimental evidence of age-related suscep- 20. Srivastava, V. K., Chauhan, S. S., Srivastava, P. K., Kumar, V., and Misra, tibility to PAH-induced carcinogenesis during fetal and neona- U. K. Fetal translocation and metabolism of PAH obtained from coal fly ash given tal development (4, 7–10). They are of concern in light of the intratracheally to pregnant rats. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, 18: 459–469, 1986. 32 association seen previously (15, 64) in molecular epidemiolog- 21. Lu, L. J., Disher, R. M., Reddy, M. V., and Randerath, K. P-postlabeling assay in mice of transplacental DNA damage induced by the environmental ical research between PAH-DNA adduct levels and cancer risk, carcinogens safrole, 4-aminobiphenyl, and benzo(a)pyrene. Cancer Res., 46: as well as PAH-DNA adducts and adverse birth outcome (49). 3046–3054, 1986.

Downloaded from cebp.aacrjournals.org on July 17, 2018. © 2001 American Association for Cancer Research. 588 Biomarkers in Paired Maternal/Newborn Samples

22. Lu, L. J., and Wang, M. Y. Modulation of benzo(a)pyrene-induced covalent RNA levels in placental tissue as a biomarker of environmental exposure. Cancer DNA modification in adult and fetal mouse tissues by gestation stage. Carcino- Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 4: 147–153, 1995. genesis (Lond.), 11: 1367–1372, 1990. 45. Whyatt, R. M., Santella, R. M., Jedrychowski, W., Garte, S. J., Bell, D. A., 23. Wang, M. Y., and Lu, L. J. Differential effect of gestation stage on benzo- Ottman, R., Gladek-Yarborough, A., Cosma, G., Young, T. L., Cooper, T. B., (a)pyrene-induced micronucleus formation and/or covalent DNA modifications in Randall, M. C., Manchester, D. K., and Perera, F. P. Relationship between mice. Cancer Res., 50: 2146–2151, 1990. ambient air pollution and procarcinogenic DNA damage in Polish mothers and 24. Bolognesi, C., Rossi, L., Barbieri, O., and Santi, L. Benzo[a]pyrene-induced newborns. Environ. Health Perspect., 106 (Suppl. 3): 821–826, 1998. DNA damage in mouse fetal tissues. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 6: 1091–1095, 46. Perera, F. P., O’Neill, J. P., Hemminiki, K., Jedrochowski, W., Bawle, U., 1985. Albertini, R. J., Santella, R., and Whyatt, R. A molecular epidemiologic study of 25. Harper, B. L., Ramanujam, V. M., and Legator, M. S. Micronucleus forma- the association between environmental exposures to carcinogens and DNA dam- tion by benzene, cyclophosphamide, benzo(a)pyrene, and benzidine in male, age and mutation in mothers and newborns. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res., 41: female, pregnant female, and fetal mice. Teratog. Carcinog. Mutagen., 9: 239– 436, 2000. 252, 1989. 47. Manchester, D. K., Parker, N. B., and Bowman, C. M. Maternal smoking 26. Mumford, J. L., Lee, X., Lewtas, J., Young, T. L., and Santella, R. M. DNA increases xenobiotic metabolism in placenta but not umbilical vein endothelium. adducts as biomarkers for assessing exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocar- Pediatr. Res., 18: 1071–1075, 1984. bons in tissues from Xuan Wei women with high exposure to coal combustion 48. Manchester, D., and Jacoby, E. Decreased placental monooxygenase activ- emissions and high lung cancer mortality. Environ. Health Perspect., 99: 83–87, ities associated with birth defects. Teratology, 30: 31–37, 1984. 1993. 49. Perera, F. P., Whyatt, R. M., Jedrychowski, W., Rauh, V., Manchester, D., 27. Surgeon General. The Health Benefits of Smoking Cessation, Biochemical Santella, R. M., and Ottman, R. Recent developments in molecular epidemiology: Markers, pp. 33–37. Washington, DC: United States Department of Health and a study of the effects of environmental polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on birth Human Services, 1990. outcomes in Poland. Am. J. Epidemiol., 147: 309–314, 1998. 28. Sepkovic, D. W., Haley, N. J., and Hoffmann, D. Elimination from the body 50. Hou, S. M., Yang, K., Nyberg, F., Hemminki, K., Pershagen, G., and of tobacco products by smokers and passive smokers. JAMA, 256: 863, 1986. Lambert, B. Hprt mutant frequency and aromatic DNA adduct levels in non- 29. Benowitz, N. L. Cotinine as a biomarker of environmental tobacco smoke smoking and smoking lung cancer patients and population controls. Carcinogen- exposure. Epidemiol. Rev., 18: 188–204, 1996. esis (Lond.), 20: 437–444, 1999. 30. Lambers, D. S., and Clark, K. E. The maternal and fetal physiologic effects 51. Yang, K., Airoldi, L., Pastorelli, R., Restano, J., Guanci, M., and Hemminki, of nicotine. Seminars in Perinatology, 20: 115–126, 1996. K. Aromatic DNA adducts in lymphocytes of humans working at high and low 31. Jordanov, J. S. Cotinine concentrations in amniotic fluid and urine of smok- traffic density areas. Chem.-Biol. Interact., 101: 127–136, 1996. ing, passive smoking, and nonsmoking pregnant women at term and in the urine 52. Reddy, M. V., and Randerath, K. Nuclease P1-mediated enhancement of of their neonates on 1st day of life. Eur. J. Pediatr., 149: 734–737, 1990. sensitivity of 32P-postlabeling test for structurally diverse DNA adducts. Carci- 32. Woodward, M., Tunstall-Pedoe, H., Smith, W. C., and Tavendale, R. Smok- nogenesis (Lond.), 7: 1543–1551, 1986. ing characteristics and inhalation biochemistry in the Scottish population. J. Clin. 53. Perera, F. P., Hemminki, K., Young, T. L., Brenner, D., Kelly, G., and Epidemiol., 44: 1405–1410, 1991. Santella, R. M. Detection of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts in 33. Pojer, R., Whitfield, J. B., Poulos, V., Eckhard, I. F., Richmond, R., and white blood cells of foundry workers. Cancer Res., 48: 2288–2291, 1988. Hensley, W. J. Carboxyhemoglobin, cotinine, and thiocyanate assay compared for 54. Santella, R. M., Gasparo, F. P., and Hsieh, L. L. Quantitation of carcinogen- distinguishing smokers from nonsmokers. Clin. Chem., 30: 1377–1380, 1984. DNA adducts with monoclonal antibodies. Prog. Exp. Tumor Res., 31: 63–75, 34. Hoffmann, D., Lavoie, E. J., and Hecht, S. S. Nicotine: a precursor for 1987. carcinogens. Cancer Lett., 26: 67–75, 1985. 55. Anderson, L. M., Jones, A. B., Miller, M. S., and Chauhan, D. P. Metabolism 35. Brunnemann, K. D., Prokopczyk, B., Djordjevic, M. V., and Hoffmann, D. of transplacental carcinogens. In: N. P. Napalkov, J. M. Rice, L. Tomatis, and H. Formation and analysis of tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines. Crit. Rev. Toxicol., Yamasaki (eds.), Perinatal and Multigeneration Carcinogenesis. IARC Scientific 26: 121–137, 1996. Publ., Vol. 96, 155–188. Lyon, France: IARC, 1989. 36. Ueda, Y., Morikawa, H., Funakoshi, T., Kobayashi, A., Yamasaki, A., 56. Pasanen, M., and Pelkonen, O. The expression and environmental regulation Takeuchi, K., Mochizuki, M., Jimbo, T., and Sato, A. Estimation of passive of P450 enzymes in human placenta. Crit. Rev. Toxicol., 24: 211–229, 1994. smoking during pregnancy by cotinine measurement and its effect on fetal 57. Manchester, D. K., and Jacoby, E. H. Sensitivity of human placental mo- growth. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi, 41: 454–460, 1989. nooxygenase activity to maternal smoking. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 30: 687–692, 37. Haddow, J. E., Knight, G. J., Palomaki, G. E., and McCarthy, J. E. Second- 1981. trimester serum cotinine levels in nonsmokers in relation to birth weight. Am. J. 58. Gurtoo, H. L., Williams, C. J., Gottlieb, K., Mulhern, A. I., Caballes, L., Obstet. Gynecol., 159: 481–484, 1988. Vaught, J. B., Marinello, A. J., and Bansal, S. K. Population distribution of 38. Sorsa, M., and Husgafvel-Pursiainen, K. Assessment of Passive and Trans- placental benzo(a)pyrene metabolism in smokers. Int. J. Cancer, 31: 29–37, 1983. placental Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. IARC Scientific Publ., Vol. 89. Lyon, 59. Sesardic, D., Pasanen, M., Pelkonen, O., and Boobis, A. R. Differential France: IARC, 1988. expression and regulation of members of the cytochrome P450IA gene subfamily 39. Luck, W., Nau, H., Hansen, R., and Steldenger, R. Extent of nicotine and in human tissues. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 11: 1183–1188, 1990. cotinine transfer to the human fetus, placenta, and amniotic fluid of smoking 60. Whyatt, R. M., Bell, D. A., Santella, R. M., Garte, S. J., Jedrychowski, W., mothers. Dev. Pharmacol. Ther., 8: 384–395, 1985. Gladek-Yarborough, A., Cosma, G., Manchester, D. K., Young, T. L., Wahren- 40. Donnenfeld, A. E., Pulkkinen, A., Palomaki, G. E., Knight, G. J., and dorf, J., Cooper, T. B., Ottman, R., and Perera, F. P. Polycyclic aromatic Haddow, J. E. Simultaneous fetal and maternal cotinine levels in pregnant women hydrocarbon-DNA adducts in human placenta and modulation by CYP1A1 in- smokers. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 168: 781–782, 1993. duction and genotype. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 19: 1389–1392, 1998. 41. Nafstad, P., Magnus, P., and Stray-Pedersen, B. Opposing placental gradients 61. Jaakkola, M. S., and Jaakkola, J. J. Assessment of exposure to environmental for thiocyanate and cotinine at birth. Early Hum. Dev., 42: 73–79, 1995. tobacco smoke. Eur. Respir. J., 10: 2384–2397, 1997. 42. Mercelina-Roumans, P. E., Schouten, H., Ubachs, J. M., and van Wersch, 62. Dempsey, D., Jacob, P., and Benowitz, N. Nicotine metabolism and elimi- J. W. Cotinine concentrations in plasma of smoking pregnant women. Eur. J. Clin. nation kinetics in the newborns. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 67: 458–465, 2000. Chem. Clin. Biochem., 34: 525–528, 1996. 63. Lackmann, G. M., Salzberger, U., Tollner, U., Chen, M., Carmella, S. G., and 43. Jauniaux, E., Gulbis, B., Acharya, G., Thiry, P., and Rodeck, C. Maternal Hecht, S. S. Metabolites of a tobacco-specific carcinogen in urine from newborns. tobacco exposure and cotinine levels in fetal fluids in the first half of pregnancy. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 91: 459–465, 1999. Obstet. Gynecol., 93: 25–29, 1999. 64. Tang, D., Rundle, A., Warburton, D., Santella, R., Tsai, W. Y., Chiamprasert, 44. Whyatt, R. M., Garte, S. J., Cosma, G., Bell, D. A., Jedrychowski, W., S., Hsu, Y. Z., and Perera, F. Association between both genetic and environmental Wahrendorf, J., Randall, M. C., Cooper, T. B., Ottman, R., Tang, D., Tsai, W-Y., biomarkers and lung cancer: evidence of a greater risk of lung cancer in women Dickey, C. P., Manchester, D. K., Crofts, F., and Perera, F. P. CYP1A1 messenger smokers. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 19: 1949–1953, 1998.

Downloaded from cebp.aacrjournals.org on July 17, 2018. © 2001 American Association for Cancer Research. Biomarkers of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon-DNA Damage and Cigarette Smoke Exposures in Paired Maternal and Newborn Blood Samples as a Measure of Differential Susceptibility

Robin M. Whyatt, Wieslaw Jedrychowski, Kari Hemminki, et al.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001;10:581-588.

Updated version Access the most recent version of this article at: http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/10/6/581

Cited articles This article cites 54 articles, 9 of which you can access for free at: http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/10/6/581.full#ref-list-1

Citing articles This article has been cited by 7 HighWire-hosted articles. Access the articles at: http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/10/6/581.full#related-urls

E-mail alerts Sign up to receive free email-alerts related to this article or journal.

Reprints and To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications Subscriptions Department at [email protected].

Permissions To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, use this link http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/10/6/581. Click on "Request Permissions" which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Rightslink site.

Downloaded from cebp.aacrjournals.org on July 17, 2018. © 2001 American Association for Cancer Research.