Printed Question and Answer
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
3100 Primary Products Bill. [COUNCIL.] Questions and Answe1·s. twenty-one years of age and upwards fullest consideration, and it is consid of a producer working on his parents' ered that the sub-paragraph proposed to farm, not for wages but for his keep .be omitted is quite .unnecessary. and pocket money only." Amendment agreed to. Clause as amended agreed to. The 'Ron. J. F. COATES: The Hon. Bill reported with amendments; re the Attorney-General has told the House port adopted. that in the Acts Interpretation Act the word "son" is int~rpreted to include the ADJOURNMENT. word "daughter." If that is quite clear ORDER OF BUSINESS. I will not bother, but if not I should like )lotion (by the Hon. F. S. Boyce) to move an amendment. In these day8 proposed: of equal rights for women I think the That this Rouse. do now adjoUl'n. House should take .the opportmiity of making this amendment. I ·move: The Hon. J. F. COATES: I desire to ask the Hon. the Attorney-General That after the word "son" first occur ring, there be inserted the f~llowing woi·ds what business he proposes to take on "or daughter." Tuesday next. Some hon. members in The Hon. G. NESBITT: 'I: have no the country ma.r require notice because objection to the amendment, ·but I have they may have to leave their occupa a distinct recollection of this question tions. arising in another place when the ·bill The •Hon. F. S. BOYCE: It is my was in the ·Committee stage. It was at intention to proceed on Tuesday next my own suggestion that an •hon. member with the ·Constitution Further Amend raised the question there, and sought to ment (Referendum) Bill, and if ai1y include daughter as well as son. It was time remains I may take the Defama held that "son" included "daughter" and tion Bill. Yice versa, the same as "husband" in Question resolved in the affirmative. cludes "wife"-a question which arises in Rouse adjourned at 6.10 p.m. until a similar Imy in another portion of the Tuesday next. Act. Amendment agreed to. Clause further consequentially amen ded and agreed to. Clause 6. The Principal Act is further Thu·rsday, 20 February, 1930. amended- Printed Question and Answer-Questions without (a) (ii) by omitting from sub-paragrarf1 Notice-Prison Labom and Road Works (}IoHon of (f) of paragraph (ii) of the same sub Urgency)- Crown Lands (Amendment) Bill section the words "with the arpp1:oval Transport Bill (second reading). of the Minister" frlld the :words "on the recomme.ndation of the board" and by inserting aft~ the word "withheld" Mr. SPEAKER took the chair. the words "or cancelled by the board." PRINTED QUESTION AND The Ron. J. RYAN: I move: ANSWER. That sub-paragraph (a) (ii) be str.uck out and that there be inserted iu lieu there NAMOI AND PEEr~ WATER of the following:- CONSERVATION. "by omitting sub-paragraph (f) of para- Mr. W. J. SCULLY ask€d the Mms graph (ii) of the same sub-section." TER FOR AGRIOVLTCRE,-Will he, before I have already referred to this amend the close of this session, refer the ques ment in my second-reading speech. The tion of theN amoi and Peel River wa:ter amendment has been framed after the conservation scheme to the Publie Questions and Answers. [20 FEB., 1930.] Questions,and· A 11swers. 3101 Works Committee for investigation and proposals which the Government has in report, so as to enable the respective mind; The only application that the water conservation lea·gues in the nbrth Government has had from Mr. Oleary and north-western centres to have a was when he asked for leave of absence definite opinion given upon this impor- for Mr. :Forster so that he could attend tant project? . a conference abroad. I know of no Answer,-! regret very much to have amount of money having been stated as · to inform the hon. member that the the probable cost of the trip. position is unchanged since I replied to a similar question ·by him .in December ROTHBURY COAL MINE. last. As then advised, investigations Mr. REID: Owing to the conflicting have not been carried out sufficiently statements regarding the output of coal far to enable the necessary data to be at Rothbury, has the Minister for Mines prepared in connection with a reference any objection to giving the House the to the Parliamentary Standing Com official figures? mittee on Public Works. The- Water Mr. BOOTH: In view of the fact Conservation and Irrigation Commis that no answer has been supplied to a sion has the scheme under considera question I asked last Thursday, which tion, and the Government is keeping has appeared on the question-paper for the matter under review; but it is im the whole of this week relative to the possible, as in the case of other pulblic aU-day workin~. at Rothbury Colliery, works, to proceed further at this junc and further, in view of the fact that ture, as owing to the present financial the 1Iinister for Mines has made state position and the limited funds available, ments through the Newcastle Herald jt is not possible to make an allocation which can be refuted, will he supply at which will admit of the necessary full the earliest possible moment an answer investigation being completed. to the question I have asked relative to a highly important and contentious QUESTIONS' WITHOUT NOTICE. matter? Mr. WEAVER: In reply to the 'hon. RAILWAY COMMISSIONER'S TRIP. member for 1\fanly, I have to say that Ur. LANG: Has the attention of the· the only set of figures other than tlowse 'Minister in charge of the House been I supplied to the press are those which drawn to an article in the Sunday Times appeared in a leading article of the Sttn criticising the proposal to send 1fr. the day before yesterday. Those are so A. D. J. Forster, Assistant Railway Com ridiculous and incorrect that I take this missioner, to Spain at a cost of £7,000? opportunity of pointing out that not Will the Minister lay upon the table of one fi~ure used by the Sun is even re the House the Chief Railway Commis motely near the truth. They stated that sioner's recent report in which he ob the average output at Rothbury Colliery jected to political interference with the had been 800 tons a day. Never in the Railway Department, and his letter to history of Rothbury Colliery has it been the Premier relating to 1\fr. Forster's 800 tons, or even 700 tons. It was barely proposed trip? Would the Minister say more than 600 tons in its most highly if 11:r. Oleary stated in his report that productive times. They also compared he would resign if the present political the output of Rothbury with a full staff interference continued? of miners with the output of Rothbury llfr. BUTTENSHAW: I know of no to-day with only a handful of miners, report furnished by the Chief Railway and attempted a comparison on: those Commissioner to the Premier or to the figures. It, therefore, is perfectly clear llfinister to the effect that he would re that the only set of figures in the press sign if political interference was con which were correct were those which we tinued. I do not think he has com issued officially. In regard to the ques plained in any shape or form of the tion of the bon. member for Kurri Kurri, 3102 Questions and Answers. (ASEEMBLY.J Questions and Answers. I promise him that I will make a very Will the Minister, also, in the interests close investigation and will supply the of justice, lay all the papers in connec figures he asks for at the earliest oppor tion with that prosecution on the table tunity. of the House? Captain CHAFFEY: In reply to the POLICE PROTECTION: NORTH ·first part of the hon. member's question, SYDNEY. I am correctly reported. In reply to his Mr. SANDERS: Will the Colonial second question, that is a matter which Secretary c~mse inquiries to be made as will depend upon the facts as they are to whether a great number of police reported through the proper official chan officers have been withdrawn from their nels, to be dealt with in accordance with usual duties on the North Shore?· Will what the administration of justice de he also a~certain from the North Syd mands. There is no question of any ney Police Station whether continual political suggestion and there is no de complaints are being made of misde sire on the part of any person associated meanours committed at Northbridge with the Government to deal with any of through the absence of police officers? these matters except in so far as the If it is a fact that those men have been course of justice will be properly fo! taken away for other duties, as, for lowed, irrespective of any person, in instance, at the Rothbury mine, will the carrying out the definite obligation Minister take steps to send over there which rests on the Government of the those police officers who are walking country to administer justice and not; around the city booking up motor-drivers t(• inte!'fere with it, as has been sug carrying out their usual business in order r:ectcd. that they may protect the .People of the Mr. LANG: Referring to the answer North Shore? just given by the Colonial Secretary, Captain CHAFFEY: The detailing am I to understand that the papers han; .for duty of any officer in the police been referred to Cabinet for considera force in any particular position or loca tion~ If so, what is the purpose--a tion is the responsibility of the Acting further prosecution? Commissioner of Police.