Nash: H&B color comments version 8 Sep 2017 Loss of color terms not demonstrated Supporting details for Letter to appear in PNAS http://www.pnas.org/, accepted 22 August 2017 David Nash School of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, The Australian National University, Acton ACT 2601, Australia E-mail:
[email protected] ORCiD 0000-0002-6675-6527 Abstract Haynie and Bowern [Haynie HJ, Bowern C (2016) PNAS 113(48):13666–13671] matched Bayesian phylogenies for 189 Pama–Nyungan languages with the presence of color terms in each vocabulary. The inferred ancestral state reconstructions led to their striking claim of ‘extensive evidence for the loss (as well as gain) of color terms’, as well as the expected ‘broad support for the most influential theory of color term development’ based on the World Color Survey [Kay P, Berlin B, MaffiL, Merrifield WR, Cook R (2009) CSLI lecture notes 159, Stanford, CA]. However their inference is invalidated by the method for selecting the vocabulary data, its patchiness, and their method’s assumption that every unknown or missing datum is a true absence. The naming of colors ‘has long been a topic of interest in the study of human culture and cognition’, and Haynie and Bowern (H&B) [54] employ promising computational phylogenetic methods to test the standard view of color terminology structure, epitomized in the World Color Survey (WCS) [71], that ‘the attested range of color-naming systems in language results from evolution along highly constrained pathways’. H&B’s main finding was not surprising: ‘general support for the WCS model of color term development, but with more nuance’.